Endoscope-guided interstitial intensity-modulated brachytherapy and intracavitary brachytherapy as boost radiation for primary early T stage nasopharyngeal carcinoma

Interventional radiotherapy (brachytherapy) for re-irradiation of recurrent head and neck malignancies: oncologic outcomes and morbidity

Objective

Management of recurrent head and neck cancer (HNC) is challenging. One option in previously irradiated patients is re-irradiation using interventional radiotherapy (IRT), the modern form of brachytherapy. Re-irradiation using IRT can be delivered as an exclusive strategy for salvage or through a postoperative or perioperative approach after salvage surgery. The aim of the present study is to analyse a bicentric Italian series focusing on the use of IRT as a re-irradiation modality and assess the resulting evidence concerning oncologic outcomes and morbidity.

Methods

This is a retrospective study performed in two referral centres in Italy: Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli in Rome and Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria in Sassari. All patients who had previously received a full course of external beam RT and have been re-irradiated using high-dose-rate IRT between December 2010 and June 2023 were included. Patients were retreated either by a combination of surgery and perioperative (either endocavitary or interstitial) IRT or by exclusive interstitial IRT.

Results

Thirty-four patients were included in the present series, 2 of whom underwent more than one IRT re-irradiation. Notably, no patient reported specific IRT-related toxicities. Median follow-up, excluding patients who died of HNC, was 24.5 months. Two-year local relapse-free survival was 26%, disease-specific survival 39.1%, and overall survival 36.6%.

Conclusions

The present series is the largest reported experience of re-irradiation by IRT for HNC in Italy. The very low rate of toxicity confirms IRT as the safest re-irradiation modality. It is noteworthy to underline that IRT is a multidisciplinary strategy based on the close cooperation between surgeons and radiation oncologists during every phase, from the recommendation of treatment and implantation in the operating theatre, to its prescription and dose painting.

Function Preservation in Head and Neck Cancers

The treatment of head and neck cancers can have a significant impact on function and appearance, which results in impairment of quality of life. Various long-term sequelae of treatment include speech and swallowing difficulty, oral incompetence, trismus, xerostomia, dental caries and osteoradionecrosis. Management has evolved from single modality treatment of either surgery or radiation to multimodality treatment to attain acceptable functional outcomes. Brachytherapy, also known as interventional radiotherapy, with its ability to deliver high doses centrally to the target, has been shown to improve local control rates. Due to the rapid fall-off of the dose of brachytherapy there is better organ at risk sparing as compared with that of external beam radiotherapy. In the head and neck region, brachytherapy has been practiced in various sites, including the oral cavity, oropharynx, nasopharynx, nasal vestibule and paranasal sinuses. Additionally, brachytherapy has also been considered for reirradiation as a salvage. Brachytherapy can also be considered as a perioperative technique together with surgery. Close multidisciplinary cooperation is required for a successful brachytherapy programme. In oral cavity cancers, depending on the location of the tumour, brachytherapy has been shown to preserve oral competence, maintain tongue mobility, maintain speech, swallowing and the hard palate. Brachytherapy in oropharyngeal cancers has been shown to reduce xerostomia and also reduce dysphagia and aspiration post-radiation therapy. For the nasopharynx, paranasal sinus and nasal vestibule, brachytherapy preserves the respiratory function of the mucosa. Despite such an incomparable impact on function and organ preservation, brachytherapy is an underutilised technique for head and neck cancers. There is a strong need to improve brachytherapy utilisation in head and neck cancers.

Brachytherapy of the head and neck: An University of California Los Angeles guide to morbidity reduction

The head and neck (H&N) region is among the most intricate and functional part of our anatomy. Major functional nerves and blood vessels with importance that affect the entire body emanate from the base of skull. Brachytherapy plays an important role as a single modality therapy in early cancer of the lip and oral cavity and a supplemental role in the pharynx or in advanced or recurrent disease. Morbidity in the H&N is intensely personal and disabling. Its avoidance is critical in determining the success or failure of a treatment program, and it is essential to preservation of quality of life. This article summarizes the current literature regarding morbidity related to H&N brachytherapy to aid patients and physicians to achieve optimal outcomes.

Image-guided interstitial brachytherapy boost for keratinizing squamous cell carcinoma of inferior wall of the nasopharynx

High-dose-rate interstitial brachytherapy (HDR-ISBT) is relatively rarely applied for the head and neck cancer because of its anatomical complexity and difficulty of applicator placement. However, its dose distribution is more confined even better than intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) and can deliver a higher dose while sparing surrounding normal tissues. In this case report, the effectiveness of HDR-ISBT as a boost following IMRT for keratinizing squamous cell carcinoma of nasopharynx was presented. A 76-year-old female who suffered from cT3N0M0 keratinizing squamous cell carcinoma of the nasopharynx was treated with definitive concurrent chemoradiation therapy involving IMRT. However, physical examination and laryngoscope fibre finding showed evident residual tumour at 60 Gy of IMRT, then, boost HDR-ISBT was proposed. After delivering 66 Gy of IMRT, CT image-guided HDR-ISBT 4 Gy in a single fraction was performed under local anaesthesia and sedation. MRI taken 5 months after HDR-ISBT showed remarkable shrinkage of the primary tumour. After HDR-ISBT, the remaining session of IMRT was delivered from the next day until 70 Gy in 35 fractions. It was demonstrated that boost HDR-ISBT combined with IMRT for keratinizing squamous cell carcinoma of the nasopharynx was performed safely and showed favourable efficacy.

Image-guided interstitial brachytherapy boost for nasopharyngeal carcinoma: technical aspects

Nasopharyngeal cancer generally responds well to concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT). However, there is a small group of patients who respond poorly to CCRT, and experience local residual tumor or local relapse. Although several attempts have been performed to such a group of patients including re-irradiation with external beam radiation therapy (EBRT) or salvage surgery, clinical results remain unsatisfactory. Intracavitary brachytherapy (ICBT) boost after CCRT with EBRT has been explored, however, its efficacy is limited to those with superficial residual tumors. For those residual tumors thickness with more than 5 mm, interstitial brachytherapy (ISBT) boost would be an appropriate modality of choice. Here, we describe technical aspects of the high-dose-rate interstitial brachytherapy (HDR-ISBT) boost for nasopharyngeal cancer (NPC) patients who responded poorly to the CCRT with EBRT.

Molecular Decision Tree Algorithms Predict Individual Recurrence Pattern for Locally Advanced Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma

Background: Recurrence remains one of the key reasons of relapse after the radical radiation for locally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC). Here, the multiple molecular and clinical variables integrated decision tree algorithms were designed to predict individual recurrence patterns (with VS without recurrence) for locally advanced NPC.

Methods: A total of 136 locally advanced NPC patients retrieved from a randomized controlled phase III trial, were included. For each patient, the expression levels of 33 clinicopathological biomarkers in tumor specimen, 3 Epstein-Barr virus related serological antibody titer and 5 clinicopathological variables, were detected and collected to construct the decision tree algorithm. The expression level of 33 clinicopathological biomarkers in tumor specimen was evaluated by immunohistochemistry staining.

Results: Three algorithm classifiers, augmented by the adaptive boosting algorithm for variable selection and classification, were designed to predict individual recurrence pattern. The classifiers were trained in the training subset and further tested using a 10-fold cross-validation scheme in the validation subset. In total, 13 molecules expression level in tumor specimen, including AKT1, Aurora-A, Bax, Bcl-2, N-Cadherin, CENP-H, HIF-1α, LMP-1, C-Met, MMP-2, MMP-9, Pontin and Stathmin, and N stage were selected to construct three 10-fold cross-validation decision tree classifiers. These classifiers showed high predictive sensitivity (87.2-93.3%), specificity (69.0-100.0%), and overall accuracy (84.5-95.2%) to predict recurrence pattern individually. Multivariate analyses confirmed the decision tree classifier was an independent prognostic factor to predict individual recurrence (algorithm 1: hazard ration (HR) 0.07, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.03-0.16, P < 0.01; algorithm 2: HR 0.13, 95% CI 0.04-0.44, P < 0.01; algorithm 3: HR 0.13, 95% CI 0.03-0.68, P = 0.02).

Conclusion: Multiple molecular and clinicopathological variables integrated decision tree algorithms may individually predict the recurrence pattern for locally advanced NPC. This decision tree algorism provides a potential tool to select patients with high recurrence risk for intensive follow-up, and to diagnose recurrence at an earlier stage for salvage treatment in the NPC endemic region.

Fibre-optic endoscope-guided three-dimensional high-dose-rate interstitial brachytherapy for residual nasopharyngeal carcinoma after conventional external beam radiotherapy

Purpose

Locally residual nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) is associated with increased risk of local failure, if additional treatment is not applied. The objective of this paper was to report the treatment effect of fibre-optic endoscope-guided three-dimensional high-dose-rate interstitial brachytherapy (3D HDR ISBT) boost, integrated with radical external beam radiotherapy (EBRT) for deep-seated NPC residual lesion.

Case report

A 52-year-old female, with a diagnosis of NPC and biopsy-proven low-differentiated squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) in left nasopharynx; the tumor size was 3.9 × 2.2 × 2.6 cm³ before treatment (T2N0M0). Three months after completion of EBRT, with a dose of 69.96 Gy in 33 fractions and concurrent chemotherapy with cisplatin, the residual tumor (3.3 × 1.8 × 2.2 cm³) was treated with 3D HDR ISBT boost under fibre-optic endoscope guidance. The brachytherapy dose was 14 Gy in 2 fractions of 7 Gy each.

Results

The removal of deep-seated residual tumor was securely achieved by 3D HDR ISBT, guided with fibre-optic endoscope. The refractory tumor in the patient healed uneventfully after fibre-optic endoscope-guided 3D HDR ISBT, without a recurrence during 26 months of follow-up.

Conclusions

Fibre-optic endoscope-guided 3D HDR ISBT boost could be an additional treatment strategy for locoregional residual NPC after radical EBRT, especially for deep invasive lesion.

Prognostic value of gross tumor regression and plasma Epstein Barr Virus DNA levels at the end of intensity-modulated radiation therapy in patients with nasopharyngeal carcinoma

PURPOSE

To assess gross tumor regression and plasma Epstein-Barr virus (EBV)-DNA levels at the end of intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) and its prognostic impact on patients with nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC).

PARTICIPANTS AND METHODS

In total, 397 patients with non-metastatic, histologically confirmed NPC were retrospectively examined. All patients underwent magnetic resonance imaging of the nasopharynx and neck, and plasma EBV DNA assays before treatment and at the end of IMRT.

RESULTS

The estimated 5-year loco-regional, local and regional relapse-free survival rates for patients with complete response (CR) and non-CR of the total tumor, primary tumor and metastatic lymph nodes at the end of IMRT were 94.9% vs. 85.8%, 96.6% vs. 87.3%, and 98.7% vs. 89.8%, respectively (P < 0.05). The estimated 5-year loco-regional relapse-free survival (LRRFS) rates for patients with persistent tumor with and without boost irradiation were 95.3% vs. 83%, respectively (P = 0.034). The estimated 5-year overall survival (OS), failure-free survival (FFS) and distant metastasis-free survival (DMFS) rates for patients with negative and positive plasma EBV DNA at the end of IMRT were 83.1% vs. 50.3%, 81.5% vs. 49.3%, and 87.6% vs. 61.5%, respectively (P < 0.001). Multivariate analyses indicated that regression of the total tumor and boost irradiation was an independent predictor of LRRFS, and plasma EBV DNA levels were independent predictors of OS, FFS and DMFS.

CONCLUSIONS

Gross tumor regression and plasma EBV DNA levels at the end of IMRT served as predictors of poor prognosis for patients with NPC. The patients with persistent tumor and/or positive plasma EBV DNA might require timely strengthening treatment.

Implantation of computed tomography-guided Iodine-125 seeds in combination with chemotherapy for the treatment of stage III non-small cell lung cancer

Purpose

We investigated the role of computed tomography (CT)-guided Iodine-125 (¹²⁵I) seed implantation in combination with chemotherapy for the treatment of stage III non-small cell lung carcinoma (NSCLC).

Material and methods

The data from 182 patients with stage III NSCLC who were treated with radioactive ¹²⁵I seed implantation between June 2002 and June 2009, and who received sequential platinum-based combination chemotherapy using the most common combination of platinum and gemcitabine, were retrospectively reviewed. The 182 patients received a prescribed dose of 110.0 Gy, with a median radioactivity of 0.70 mCi (range, 0.64-0.78 mCi, 2.37-3.26 × 107 Bq). The median number of ¹²⁵I seeds was 38 pellets (range, 6-105 pellets). The median post-operation dose covering 100% of the target volume (D₁₀₀) was 94.5 Gy (range, 54.6-125.5 Gy). The median D₉₀ was 143.0 Gy (range, 121.6-184.0).

Results

The 1-, 3-, and 5-year overall survival rates were 83.35%, 25.57%, and 11.34%, respectively; the median survival time was 24.76 months. At 1, 3, and 5 years, the local control rates were 92.01%, 86.51%, and 76.45%, respectively; the median local control time was 25.28 months. For patients with stage IIIA and IIIB NSCLC, the median survival times were 26.67 and 24.59 months, respectively (p = 0.2). Pre-treatment hemoglobin level, tumor volume, and postoperative D₁₀₀ were significantly associated with survival. A total of 24 patients experienced pneumothorax (incidence rate, 13.20%), and 17 patients experienced hemothorax (incidence rate, 5.0%).

Conclusions

CT-guided ¹²⁵I seed implantation combined with chemotherapy is an effective, minimally invasive method for the treatment of stage III NSCLC. Furthermore, hemoglobin levels before treatment, D₁₀₀, and the maximum diameter of the tumor may be prognostic factors in patients with NSCLC treated sequentially with radiotherapy and chemotherapy.

GEC-ESTRO ACROP recommendations for head & neck brachytherapy in squamous cell carcinomas: 1st update - Improvement by cross sectional imaging based treatment planning and stepping source technology

The Head and Neck Working Group of the GEC-ESTRO (Groupe Européen de Curiethérapie - European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology) published in 2009 the consensus recommendations for low-dose rate, pulsed-dose rate and high-dose rate brachytherapy in head & neck cancers. The use of brachytherapy in combination with external beam radiotherapy and/or surgery was also covered as well as the use of brachytherapy in previously irradiated patients. Given the developments in the field, these recommendations needed to be updated to reflect up-to-date knowledge. The present update does not repeat basic knowledge which was published in the first recommendation but covers in a general part developments in (1) dose and fractionation, (2) aspects of treatment selection for brachytherapy alone versus combined BT+EBRT and (3) quality assurance issues. Detailed expert committee opinion intends to help the clinical practice in lip-, oral cavity-, oropharynx-, nasopharynx-, and superficial cancers. Different aspects of adjuvant treatment techniques and their results are discussed, as well the possibilities of salvage brachytherapy applications.

American Brachytherapy Society Task Group Report: Combined external beam irradiation and interstitial brachytherapy for base of tongue tumors and other head and neck sites in the era of new technologies

Irradiation plays an important role in the treatment of cancers of the head and neck providing a high locoregional tumor control and preservation of organ functions. External beam irradiation (EBI) results in unnecessary radiation exposure of the surrounding normal tissues increasing the incidence of side effects (xerostomy, osteoradionecrosis, and so forth). Brachytherapy (BT) seems to be the best choice for dose escalation over a short treatment period and for minimizing radiation-related normal tissue damage due to the rapid dose falloff around the source. Low-dose-rate BT is being increasingly replaced by pulsed-dose-rate and high-dose-rate BT because the stepping source technology offers the advantage of optimizing dose distribution by varying dwell times. Pulsed-dose and high-dose rates appear to yield local control and complication rates equivalent to those of low-dose rate. BT may be applied alone; but in case of high risk of nodal metastases, it is used together with EBI. This review presents the results and the indications of combined BT and EBI in carcinoma of the base of tongue and other sites of the head and neck region, as well as the role BT plays among other-normal tissue protecting-modern radiotherapy modalities (intensity-modulated radiotherapy, stereotactic radiotherapy) applied in these localizations.

Endoscopy-guided brachytherapy for sinonasal and nasopharyngeal recurrences

OBJECTIVE/PURPOSE

To evaluate the preliminary results of perioperative endoscopy-guided brachytherapy (BT) in recurrent sinonasal and nasopharyngeal tumors already treated for their primary tumor with a full course of radiotherapy.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Patients with recurrence and already treated with a previous full course of radiotherapy >65 Gy who underwent BT from December 2010 to January 2014 were taken into account for this work. Macroscopic disease was resected by an endoscopic approach, and catheters for BT were endoscopically positioned and fixed at the same time on the surgical bed. Surgery was performed under electromagnetic navigation guidance. The irradiation dose was 30 Gy in 12 fractions, 2.5 Gy each, twice a day, in 6 days.

RESULTS

We performed the endoscopy-guided BT 11 times in 9 patients; in two cases, no previous radiation therapy had been performed; and in one case, followup was too short to be considered. A total of 6 patients were eligible for the analysis. One patient underwent BT three times because of previous target margin recurrences. There were no immediate complications. The median and mean followups were 21 and 19 months, respectively. The median V90 and V85% were 93% and 95%, respectively. In one case, we had a transient deficit of the VI cranial nerve (G3), and in another case, we diagnosed a noncomplicated osteonecrosis (G2). The median disease-free survival is 12 months, and the median overall survival is 23 months.

CONCLUSIONS

The combination of endoscopy and BT seems to be a safe option for treating recurrent sinonasal and nasopharyngeal tumors.

Modern head and neck brachytherapy: from radium towards intensity modulated interventional brachytherapy

Intensity modulated brachytherapy (IMBT) is a modern development of classical interventional radiation therapy (brachytherapy), which allows the application of a high radiation dose sparing severe adverse events, thereby further improving the treatment outcome. Classical indications in head and neck (H&N) cancers are the face, the oral cavity, the naso- and oropharynx, the paranasal sinuses including base of skull, incomplete resections on important structures, and palliation. The application type can be curative, adjuvant or perioperative, as a boost to external beam radiation as well as without external beam radiation and with palliative intention. Due to the frequently used perioperative application method (intraoperative implantation of inactive applicators and postoperative performance of radiation), close interdisciplinary cooperation between surgical specialists (ENT-, dento-maxillary-facial-, neuro- and orbital surgeons), as well interventional radiotherapy (brachytherapy) experts are obligatory. Published results encourage the integration of IMBT into H&N therapy, thereby improving the prognosis and quality of life of patients.

3D-image-guided HDR-brachytherapy versus 2D HDR - brachytherapy after external beam radiotherapy for early T-stage nasopharyngeal carcinoma

Background

Two-dimensional high-dose-rate brachytherapy (2D-HDR-BT) is an effective method of dose escalation for local tumor control in early T-stage nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC). Treatment outcomes for 3D-image-guided high-dose-rate brachytherapy (3D-image-guided-HDR-BT) after external beam radiotherapy (ERT) have not been examined in early T-stage NPC patients. The current study was designed to evaluate whether addition of 3D-HDR-BT to ERT showed further improvement in treatment outcomes in patients with early T-stage NPC when compared to 2D-HDR-BT after ERT.

Methods

The current study retrospectively analyzed and compared treatment outcomes for patients with nonmetastatic stage T1-2b NPC treated with 2D-HDR-BT (n =101) or 3D-HDR-BT (n =118) after ERT. Patients in both groups were treated with ERT at a mean dose of 60 Gy and a brachytherapy dose of 12Gy (8 ~ 20Gy), 2.5 ~ 5Gy per fraction under local anesthesia.

Results

Compared to patients treated with 2D-HDR-BT after ERT, patients treated with 3D-HDR-BT after ERT showed improvement in five-year actuarial local control survival rates (p = 0.024), local/regional relapse-free survival rates (p = 0.038), and disease-free survival rates (p = 0.021). Multivariate analysis showed that NPC patients treated with 3D-HDR-BT had improved local control survival (p = 0.042). The incidence rates of acute or chronic complications were similar between two groups.

Conclusions

The current study showed that 3D-image-guided HDR-BT after ERT was an effective treatment modality for patients with stage T1-2 NPC with acceptable complications. The improvement in local tumor control and disease free survival is likely due to improved conformal dose distributions.