Is cryoballoon ablation preferable to radiofrequency ablation for treatment of atrial fibrillation by pulmonary vein isolation? A meta-analysis

Cost-Effectiveness of Cryoballoon Ablation Versus Radiofrequency Ablation for Paroxysmal Atrial Fibrillation in China: Results Based on Real-World Data

BACKGROUND

Paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (AF) presents a significant economic burden to the healthcare system. Catheter ablations is a commonly adopted treatment for paroxysmal AF.

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the cost effectiveness of cryoballoon ablation versus radiofrequency ablation in patients with drug-refractory paroxysmal AF in a tertiary hospital in China.

METHODS

A Markov model was developed to study the effects and costs. Cost and probability input data were obtained mainly from a retrospective real-world study conducted in a tertiary hospital. Propensity score matching was used to overcome retrospective bias. Input data gaps were remedied by means of literature review and advice from experts. A simulation was performed for the post-procedure lifetime years. Univariate and probabilistic sensitivity analyses were conducted.

RESULTS

In the base-case analysis of a lifetime time horizon, a patient treated with cryoballoon ablation was associated with 7.85 quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) and ¥132 222 ($19 913) total costs, whereas a radiofrequency ablation treated patient was associated with 7.71 QALYs and ¥147 304 ($22 184) total costs. The cryoballoon group had slightly better health outcomes (with a difference of 0.14 QALY) and lower total costs (with a difference of ¥15 082) (USD $2 271), and it may be considered as cost-effective or cost-saving strategy (incremental cost-effectiveness ratio -¥110 158 [$16 590] per QALY) for the management of paroxysmal AF. Different scenarios were tested with sensitivity analyses, but still, the outcomes remained cost-effective or cost-saving for cryoballoon ablation.

CONCLUSIONS

An economic evaluation based on real-world data suggests that, relative to radiofrequency ablation, cryoballoon ablation may be considered as a more cost-effective or cost-saving long-term strategy for drug-refractory paroxysmal AF in this tertiary hospital in China. However, further evidence is needed using data from large-scale studies in order to reflect a national perspective.

Pulmonary vein remodeling following pulmonary vein isolation in patients with atrial fibrillation-do pulmonary veins represent only an epiphenomenon? A cardiac MRI study

Background

After successful pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) for atrial fibrillation (AF), the left atrium (LA) undergoes reverse remodeling. However, few studies have directly studied pulmonary vein (PV) remodeling and focused on whether pre PVI-PV conditions could predict outcome of the procedure. We hypothesize that: (I) post PVI, in addition to LA remodeling the PVs undergo a parallel degree of remodeling; and (II) that PV characteristics pre PVI can be used to identify patients more likely to sustain normal sinus rhythm (NSR).

Methods

Patients (n=100) scheduled for PVI had a cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) imaging before and 6±2 months following PVI. PV cross sectional areas (CSA) within 0.5 cm of the ostium and LA volumes were measured. Patients were categorized as responders (R) or non-responders (NR), based on two separate 14-day Holter monitoring.

Results

PVs CSA were significantly reduced post procedure in both groups, R (233±53 to 192±52 mm², P<0.001) and NR (241±54 to 207±44 mm², P<0.001), however, the difference between R and NR post PVI was not significant (192±52 to 207±44 mm², P=0.19). Reduction in PVs CSAs post procedure moderately correlated with the 3D LA volume reduction (r=0.48, P<0.001).

Conclusions

PVs mirror the LA in that they significantly change in size following PVI yet they were not found to directly predict maintenance of NSR.

The Role of Echocardiography in Determining the Method of Ablation for the Treatment of Paroxysmal Atrial Fibrillation: A Literature Review

Atrial fibrillation is the most common cardiac arrhythmia, affecting approximately 1 out of every 250 people. It is associated with thrombus formation in the left atrium, decreased cardiac output, and deterioration of the myocardium. There are multiple treatments available for paroxysmal atrial fibrillation. This literature review will assess the benefits, risks, and complications associated with radiofrequency ablation and cryoablation, which utilize heat and freezing mechanisms, respectively. The review will also assess the role of echocardiography in determining which treatment, if any, is appropriate for atrial fibrillation.

Cryoballoon vs. radiofrequency ablation for paroxysmal atrial fibrillation: an updated meta-analysis of randomized and observational studies

Aims

Radiofrequency (RF) ablation represents a standard of care for pulmonary vein isolation in patients with drug-refractory paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (AF). In this setting, cryoballoon (CB) ablation has emerged as alternative therapy. However, the efficacy and safety of CB vs. RF ablation in patients with paroxysmal AF remain a matter of debate.

Methods and results

We searched electronic scientific databases for studies of CB vs. RF ablation in patients with paroxysmal AF. Aggregate data were pooled to perform a meta-analysis. The primary efficacy and safety outcomes were the recurrence of any atrial arrhythmia and procedure-related complications, respectively. A total of 6473 participants from 10 studies (CB, n = 2232 vs. RF, n = 4241) were studied. After a median follow-up of 16 months, the risk of any atrial arrhythmia recurrence (risk ratio, RR 95% confidence interval [95% CI] = 1.01 [0.90-1.14], P = 0.83) and procedure-related complications (RR [95% CI] = 0.92 [0.66-1.28], P = 0.61) were comparable between CB vs. RF ablation. Cryoballoon ablation led to a higher risk of persistent phrenic nerve palsy (RR [95% CI] = 13.60 [3.87-47.81], P < 0.01) and a lower risk of cardiac tamponade (RR [95% CI] = 0.48 [0.25-0.89], P = 0.02) compared with RF ablation. There was a trend of statistically significant interaction between the type of CB and the duration of ablation (P for interaction = 0.09).

Conclusion

In patients with paroxysmal AF, ablation therapy with CB is associated with efficacy and safety comparable to that of RF. Second-generation CB catheters seem to reduce procedure duration. Further studies are warranted to disclose the impact of second-generation CB catheters compared with RF for ablation of paroxysmal AF.

Cryoballoon versus Radiofrequency Ablation for Atrial Fibrillation: A Meta-analysis of 16 Clinical Trials

Introduction: We aimed to study the procedural characteristics, efficacy and safety of cryoballoon ablation (CBA) versus radiofrequency ablation (RFA) for catheter ablation of paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (AF). Methods: A systematic literature search was performed using PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Science, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials to clinical trials comparing CBA and RFA for AF. Outcomes were evaluated for efficacy, procedure characteristics and safety. For each study, odd ratio (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated for endpoints for both approaches. Results: We analyzed a total of 9,957 participants (3,369 in the CBA and 6,588 in RFA group) enrolled in 16 clinical trials. No significant difference was observed between CBA and RFA with regards to freedom from atrial arrhythmia at 12-months, recurrent atrial arrhythmias or repeat catheter ablation. CBA group had a significantly higher transient phrenic nerve injury (OR 14.19, 95% CI: 6.92-29.10; p<0.001) and persistent phrenic nerve injury (OR 4.62, 95% CI: 1.97-10.81; p<0.001); and a significantly lower pericardial effusion/cardiac tamponade (OR 0.43, 95% CI: 0.26-0.72; p=0.001), and groin site complications (OR 0.60, 95% CI: 0.38-0.93; p=0.02). No significant difference was observed in overall complications, stroke/thromboembolic events, major bleeding, and minor bleeding. Conclusion: CBA was non-inferior to RFA for catheter ablation of paroxysmal AF. RF ablation was associated with a higher groin complications and pericardial effusion/cardiac tamponade, whereas CBA was associated with higher rates of transient and persistent phrenic nerve injury.

Localization of gaps during redo ablations of paroxysmal atrial fibrillation: Preferential patterns depending on the choice of cryoballoon ablation or radiofrequency ablation for the initial procedure

BACKGROUND

Pulmonary vein (PV) isolation, using cryoballoon or radiofrequency ablation, is the cornerstone therapy for symptomatic paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (AF) refractory to antiarrhythmic drugs. One-third of the patients have recurrences, mainly due to PV reconnections.

AIMS

To describe the different locations of reconnection sites in patients who had previously undergone radiofrequency or cryoballoon ablation, and to compare the characteristics of the redo procedures in both instances.

METHODS

Demographic data and characteristics of the initial ablation (cryoballoon or radiofrequency) were collected. Number and localization of reconduction gaps, and redo characteristics were reviewed.

RESULTS

Seventy-four patients scheduled for a redo ablation of paroxysmal AF were included; 38 had been treated by radiofrequency ablation and 36 by cryoballoon ablation during the first procedure. For the initial ablation, procedural and fluoroscopy times were significantly shorter for cryoballoon ablation (147.8±52.6min vs. 226.6±64.3min [P<0.001] and 37.0±17.7min vs. 50.8±22.7min [P=0.005], respectively). Overall, an identical number of gaps was found during redo procedures of cryoballoon and radiofrequency ablations. However, a significantly higher number of gaps were located in the right superior PV for patients first ablated with radiofrequency (0.9±1.0 vs. 0.5±0.9; P=0.009). Gap localization displayed different patterns. Although not significant, redo procedures of cryoballoon ablation were slightly shorter and needed shorter durations of radiofrequency to achieve PV isolation.

CONCLUSIONS

During redo procedures, gap localization pattern is different for patients first ablated with cryoballoon or radiofrequency ablation, and right superior PV reconnections occur more frequently after radiofrequency ablation. Redo ablation of a previous cryoballoon ablation appears to be easier.

microRNA expression changes after atrial fibrillation catheter ablation

Atrial fibrillation (AF) is most common arrhythmia in general population, with increasing trend in mortality and morbidity. Electrophysiological and structural abnormalities, promoting abnormal impulse formation and propagation, lead to this disease. AF catheter ablation is related to a not small percentage of nonresponder patients. microRNAs (miRs) have been used as AF fibrotic and electrical alterations biomarkers. miRs may differentiate responders patients to ablative approach. Selective miR target therapy, as upregulation by adenovirus transfection and/or miR downregulation by antagomiR, may be used to treat AF patients. Catheter ablation of triggering electrical pulmonary veins activity or fibrotic areas defragmentation may be upgraded by miR therapy to prevent cardiac electrical and fibrotic remodeling after AF ablation.

Outcomes Of Cryoballoon Ablation Of Atrial Fibrillation: A Comprehensive Review

Over the last decade, cryoballoon ablation has emerged as an effective alternate strategy to point-by-point radiofrequency ablation for treatment of symptomatic atrial fibrillation. There are several reasons for this. First, the acute and long-term safety and efficacy associated with cryoablation appear comparable to that of radiofrequency ablation in patients with both paroxysmal and also persistent atrial fibrillation. Second, cryoablation offers certain advantages over conventional radiofrequency ablation including a gentler learning curve, shorter ablation and procedure times as well as lack of need for costly electroanatomical mapping technologies commonly utilized with radiofrequency ablation. Lastly, with the recent advent of the second-generation cryoballoon, the effectiveness of cryoablation has further improved dramatically. This comprehensive review examines the gradual evolution of the cryoablation tools as well as the rationale and data in support of the currently-available cryoballoon technologies for catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation.

Cryoballoon Versus Open Irrigated Radiofrequency Ablation in Patients With Paroxysmal Atrial Fibrillation: The Prospective, Randomized, Controlled, Noninferiority FreezeAF Study

Supplemental Digital Content is available in the text.

There is a lack of data on the comparative efficacy and procedural safety of open irrigated radiofrequency (RF) and cryoballoon catheter (CB) ablation for pulmonary vein isolation in patients with paroxysmal atrial fibrillation.

Atrial fibrillation ablation in the era of cryoballoon and force-sensing catheters: freeze or burn?

OPINION STATEMENT

Atrial fibrillation can adversely affect the quality of life for many patients. Though antiarrhythmic drug therapy remains an option for the treatment of atrial fibrillation, the drugs are associated with numerous side effects. Atrial fibrillation ablation has been shown to be as efficacious as antiarrhythmic drug therapy. The field of atrial fibrillation ablations has evolved over time from utilizing radiofrequency energy to using cryoenergy. Newer technologies are being developed with efforts to improve outcomes in patients undergoing atrial fibrillation ablations. This article will highlight two such technologies: cryoballoon ablation catheters and contact force-sensing catheters. These novel catheters appear to be further revolutionizing this young field in electrophysiology.

[Advances in cryoballoon technology: benefits and risks in daily practice]

BACKGROUND

Cryoballoon ablation is nowadays a standard approach for pulmonary vein isolation in symptomatic atrial fibrillation. The second generation cryoballoon was introduced in 2012 and modifications and enhancement to the system promised a higher efficiency.

OBJECTIVES, MATERIALS AND METHODS

A comprehensive overview of advances in cryoballoon ablation is provided and the consequences for daily practice are described based on a PubMed literature search, taking into account own experiences.

RESULTS AND CONCLUSION

Advances in cryoballoon ablation result in a significantly higher efficiency. To maintain the overall safety of the procedure and to avoid phrenic nerve palsy and esophageal lesions, special care needs to be taken by following some safety aspects and cut-off criteria. More data are necessary to clarify if recommendations for cryoenergy titration with the new balloon are reasonable. Ongoing prospective studies comparing cryoballoon and radiofrequency (RF) ablation will give answers to the question which energy source is more favorable, and upcoming studies will evaluate the impact of cryoballoon ablation as a first line treatment option.