1
|
Dombrowski C, Bourgain C, Ma Y, Meiwald A, Pinsent A, Weynand B, Turner KME, Huntington S, Adams EJ, Bogers J, Croes R, Sahebali S. An economic evaluation of two cervical screening algorithms in Belgium: HR-HPV primary compared to HR-HPV and liquid-based cytology co-testing. Eur J Cancer Prev 2024; 33:262-270. [PMID: 37933867 DOI: 10.1097/cej.0000000000000856] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/08/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To assess the costs and benefits of two algorithms for cervical cancer screening in Belgium (1) high-risk human papillomavirus (HR-HPV) primary screening and (2) HR-HPV and liquid-based cytology (LBC) co-testing. METHODS A decision tree was adapted from published work and parameterised using HORIZON study data and Belgian cost and population data. The theoretical model represents two different screening algorithms for a cohort of 577 846 women aged 25-64 attending routine cervical screening. Scenario analyses were used to explore the impact of including vaccinated women and alternative pricing approaches. Uncertainty analyses were conducted. RESULTS The cost per woman screened was €113.50 for HR-HPV primary screening and €101.70 for co-testing, representing a total cost of €65 588 573 and €58 775 083, respectively, for the cohort; a 10% difference. For one screening cycle, compared to HR-HPV primary, co-testing resulted in 13 173 more colposcopies, 67 731 more HR-HPV tests and 477 020 more LBC tests. Co-testing identified 2351 more CIN2+ cases per year (27% more than HR-HPV primary) and 1602 more CIN3+ cases (24% more than HR-HPV primary) than HR-HPV primary. CONCLUSION In Belgium, a co-testing algorithm could increase cervical pre-cancer detection rates compared to HR-HPV primary. Co-testing would cost less than HR-HPV primary if the cost of the HPV test and LBC were cost-neutral compared to the current cost of LBC screening but would cost more if the cost per HPV test and LBC were the same in both co-testing and HR-HPV primary strategies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Claire Bourgain
- The Cytology Working Group of the Belgian Society of Pathology, Brussel, Belgium
| | - Yixuan Ma
- Aquarius Population Health, London, UK
| | | | | | - Birgit Weynand
- The Cytology Working Group of the Belgian Society of Pathology, Brussel, Belgium
| | | | | | | | - Johannes Bogers
- The Cytology Working Group of the Belgian Society of Pathology, Brussel, Belgium
- University of Antwerp, Laboratory for Cell Biology and Histology, Antwerp
| | | | - Shaira Sahebali
- The Cytology Working Group of the Belgian Society of Pathology, Brussel, Belgium
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
De Prez V, Jolidon V, Willems B, Cullati S, Burton-Jeangros C, Bracke P. Cervical cancer screening programs and their context-dependent effect on inequalities in screening uptake: a dynamic interplay between public health policy and welfare state redistribution. Int J Equity Health 2021; 20:211. [PMID: 34560888 PMCID: PMC8464130 DOI: 10.1186/s12939-021-01548-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/04/2021] [Accepted: 09/11/2021] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND While organized and opportunistic cervical cancer screening (CCS) programs implemented across the European Union have increased participation rates, barriers to socioeconomically deprived women remain substantial, implying high levels of inequality in CCS uptake. AIM This study assesses how the screening strategy (as a score based on the availability of organized population-based CCS programs), accessibility of the healthcare system (as an index of out-of-pocket expenditure as a proportion of total healthcare costs, public health expenditure as a percentage of total GDP, and general practitioner (GP) density per 10'000 inhabitants) and social protection (as a decommodification index), impact education- and income-based inequalities in CCS uptake. METHODS A two-level design with 25-64-year-old women (N = 96'883), eligible for Pap smear screening, nested in 28 European countries, was used to analyze data from the European Health Interview Survey's second wave, using multilevel logistic regression modelling. RESULTS Clear educational and income gradients in CCS uptake were found, which were smaller in countries with organized CCS programs, higher accessibility of the healthcare system and a higher level of decommodification. Furthermore, three-way interaction terms revealed that these gradients were smaller when organized CCS programs were implemented in countries with better accessibility of the healthcare system or a high level of decommodification. CONCLUSION This study indicates that the combination of organized screening and high accessibility of the healthcare system or social protection is essential for having lower levels of inequality in CCS uptake. In such countries, the structural threshold for poorer and lower educated women to engage in CCS is lower. This may be explained by them having a better interaction with their GP, who may convince them of the screening test, lower out-of-pocket payments, and financial support to buffer against a disadvantageous position on the labor market.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Vincent De Prez
- Department of Sociology, Ghent University, Korte Meer 5, 9000, Ghent, Belgium.
| | - Vladimir Jolidon
- Institute of Sociological Research, Geneva School of Social Sciences, University of Geneva, 40 bd du Pont-d'Arve, CH- 1211, Geneve 4, Switzerland
| | - Barbara Willems
- Department of Sociology, Ghent University, Korte Meer 5, 9000, Ghent, Belgium
| | - Stéphane Cullati
- Institute of Sociological Research, Geneva School of Social Sciences, University of Geneva, 40 bd du Pont-d'Arve, CH- 1211, Geneve 4, Switzerland.,Population Health Laboratory, Department of Community Health, Faculty of Science and Medicine, University of Fribourg, Ch. du Musée 8, CH-1700, Fribourg, Switzerland
| | - Claudine Burton-Jeangros
- Institute of Sociological Research, Geneva School of Social Sciences, University of Geneva, 40 bd du Pont-d'Arve, CH- 1211, Geneve 4, Switzerland
| | - Piet Bracke
- Department of Sociology, Ghent University, Korte Meer 5, 9000, Ghent, Belgium
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
De Pauw H, Donders G, Weyers S, De Sutter P, Doyen J, Tjalma WAA, Vanden Broeck D, Peeters E, Van Keer S, Vorsters A, Arbyn M. Cervical cancer screening using HPV tests on self-samples: attitudes and preferences of women participating in the VALHUDES study. ACTA ACUST UNITED AC 2021; 79:155. [PMID: 34462004 PMCID: PMC8403820 DOI: 10.1186/s13690-021-00667-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 27] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/14/2021] [Accepted: 07/30/2021] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
Abstract
Background Interventions to reach women who do not participate regularly in screening may reduce the risk of cervical cancer. Self-collection of a vaginal specimen has been shown to increase participation. The relative clinical accuracy of human papillomavirus (HPV) testing on first-void urine (with Colli-Pee) and on vaginal self-samples versus on cervical clinician-collected samples is being investigated in the VALHUDES trial. The current study assesses attitudes and experiences regarding self-sampling among women enrolled in VALHUDES. Methods Questionnaires from 515 women (age 25–64 years [N = 498]; < 25 [N = 10], age ≥ 65 [N = 3], enrolled between December 2017 - January 2020) referred to colposcopy because of previous cervical abnormalities and enrolled in VALHUDES (NCT03064087) were analysed. Results Of the 515 participants, nearly all women confirmed that self-sampling may help in reaching under-screened women (93%). Nevertheless, 44% of the participants stated before starting collection that a clinician-collected sample is more effective than a self-collected sample. After self-sampling, the large majority of women (> 95%) declared that instructions for self-collection were clear, that collection was easy, and that they were confident about having performed the procedure correctly, for both urine and vaginal collection. However, a proportion of women found self-sampling unpleasant (9.5% [49/515] for urine collection; 18.6% [96/515] and 15.5% [80/515] for vaginal sampling with cotton swabs or plastic brushes, respectively). For their next screening round, 57% would prefer self-sampling whereas 41% opted for collection by a clinician. Among women preferring self-sampling, 53% would choose for urine collection, 38% for vaginal self-collection and 9% had no preference. Age did not modify preferences. Conclusion We conclude that both urine and vaginal self-sampling are well accepted by women, with a preference for urine sampling. Although the large majority of women are confident in their ability to perform self-sampling, four to five over ten women preferred specimen collection by a clinician. Trial registration The study VALHUDES was registered in ClinicalTrials.gov (identifier: NCT03064087). Supplementary Information The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s13690-021-00667-4.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hélène De Pauw
- Unit of Cancer Epidemiology, Belgian Cancer Centre, Sciensano, J. Wytsmanstreet 14, B1050, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Gilbert Donders
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology of the General Regional Hospital Heilig Hart (RZ Tienen), Tienen, Belgium.,Femicare vzw, Clinical Research for Women, Tienen, Belgium.,Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Antwerp University Hospital (UZA), Antwerp, Belgium
| | - Steven Weyers
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Ghent University Hospital (UZ Ghent), Ghent, Belgium.,Department of Human Structure and Repair, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Ghent, Ghent, Belgium
| | - Philippe De Sutter
- Department of Gynaecology & Oncology, Universitair Ziekenhuis Brussel (UZ Brussel) - Vrije Universiteit Brussel (VUB), Brussels, Belgium
| | - Jean Doyen
- Department Gynaecology-Obstetrics, Liège University Hospital (CHU Liège), Liège, Belgium
| | - Wiebren A A Tjalma
- Multidisciplinary Breast Clinic, Unit Gynaecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Antwerp University Hospital (UZA), Edegem, Belgium.,Molecular Imaging, Pathology, Radiotherapy, Oncology (MIPRO), Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium
| | - Davy Vanden Broeck
- Laboratory of Molecular Pathology, AML Sonic Healthcare, Antwerp, Belgium.,National Reference Centre for HPV, Brussels, Belgium.,AMBIOR, Laboratory for Cell Biology & Histology, University of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium.,International Centre for Reproductive Health, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium
| | - Eliana Peeters
- Unit of Cancer Epidemiology, Belgian Cancer Centre, Sciensano, J. Wytsmanstreet 14, B1050, Brussels, Belgium.,Unit of Cancer Epidemiology, Belgian Cancer Centre, Scientific Institute of Public Health, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Severien Van Keer
- Centre for the Evaluation of Vaccination (CEV), Vaccine & Infectious Disease Institute (VAXINFECTIO), Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Antwerp, Wilrijk, Antwerp, Belgium
| | - Alex Vorsters
- Centre for the Evaluation of Vaccination (CEV), Vaccine & Infectious Disease Institute (VAXINFECTIO), Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Antwerp, Wilrijk, Antwerp, Belgium
| | - Marc Arbyn
- Unit of Cancer Epidemiology, Belgian Cancer Centre, Sciensano, J. Wytsmanstreet 14, B1050, Brussels, Belgium. .,Department of Human Structure and Repair, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Ghent, Ghent, Belgium.
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
De Prez V, Jolidon V, Willems B, Cullati S, Burton-Jeangros C, Bracke P. Cervical cancer (over)screening in Belgium and Switzerland: trends and social inequalities. Eur J Public Health 2021; 30:410-415. [PMID: 32155248 DOI: 10.1093/eurpub/ckaa041] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/13/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Cervical cancer screening (CCS) by means of Pap smears has led to a decrease in cervical cancer incidence and mortality. In the absence of organized programmes, CCS is opportunistic in Belgium and Switzerland. This might result in a high level of CCS overuse, as screening practices do not conform to the recommended 3-yearly screening interval and the target age-ranges (Belgium: 25-64, Switzerland: 20-70). This study aimed to assess trends in CCS uptake and overuse in Belgium and Switzerland and their social determinants, in the light of reimbursement initiatives, which were implemented in both countries. METHODS Data from five waves of the Belgian Health Interview Survey (1997-2013) (N=11 141) and Swiss Health Interview Survey (1992-2012) (N=32 696) were used. We performed Poisson regressions to estimate adjusted prevalence ratios (APR), controlled for socio-economic and socio-demographic characteristics and health status. CCS overuse was operationalized as screening more than once every 3 years and screening above recommended age-range. RESULTS CCS uptake remained relatively stable over time, with a mean coverage of 70.9% in Belgium and 73.1% in Switzerland. Educational and income gradients were found in both countries. Concerning CCS overuse, women above screening-eligible age showed consistently high screening rates, but screening within the past year declined significantly in both countries, matching the temporal implementation of the reimbursement initiatives. CONCLUSIONS Although no increase in CCS coverage could be established, CCS has become more efficient in both countries as Pap smear overuse at the population level has declined after the implementation of reimbursement measures tackling CCS overuse.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Vladimir Jolidon
- Institute of Sociological Research, Geneva School of Social Sciences, University of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland
| | | | - Stéphane Cullati
- Institute of Sociological Research, Geneva School of Social Sciences, University of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland.,Population Health Laboratory, Department of Community Health, Faculty of Science and Medicine, University of Fribourg, Fribourg, Switzerland
| | - Claudine Burton-Jeangros
- Institute of Sociological Research, Geneva School of Social Sciences, University of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland
| | - Piet Bracke
- Department of Sociology, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Jolidon V, De Prez V, Willems B, Bracke P, Cullati S, Burton-Jeangros C. Never and under cervical cancer screening in Switzerland and Belgium: trends and inequalities. BMC Public Health 2020; 20:1517. [PMID: 33028278 PMCID: PMC7542418 DOI: 10.1186/s12889-020-09619-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 21] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/05/2020] [Accepted: 09/27/2020] [Indexed: 12/18/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Research on inequalities in cervical cancer screening (CCS) participation has overlooked the distinction between ‘never-’ and ‘under-screeners’ while different socioeconomic and demographic determinants may underlie ‘non-’ and ‘under-’ screening participation. This study examines socioeconomic and demographic inequalities in never and under CCS participation. We compare cross-national prevalence and trends among these two groups in Switzerland and Belgium, two countries with similar opportunistic CCS strategy but different healthcare systems. Methods Data on 38,806 women aged 20–70 from the Swiss Health Interview Survey (1992–2012) and 19,019 women aged 25–64 from the Belgian Health Interview Survey (1997–2013), both population-based cross-sectional nationally representative surveys, was analysed. Weighted adjusted prevalence ratios were estimated with multivariate Poisson regressions. Results Over the studied period, never screening prevalence was about 15% in both Switzerland and Belgium and under screening prevalence about 14.0%. Socioeconomic gradients were found among both never- and under-screeners. Higher income women had lower never and under screening prevalence in Switzerland and a similar gradient in education was observed in Belgium. Importantly, distinct socioeconomic and demographic determinants were found to underlie never and under screening participation. Never screening was significantly higher among foreign nationals in both countries and this association was not observed in under screening. Never screening prevalence was lower among older age groups, while under screening increased with older age. Over time, age inequalities diminished among never- and under- screeners in Switzerland while educational inequalities increased among never-screeners in Belgium. Conclusion Findings revealed that determinants of screening inequalities differed among never- and under-screeners and hence these should be addressed with different public health strategies. Crucially, socioeconomic and demographic inequalities were more pronounced among never-screeners who appeared to face more structural and persistent inequalities. Differences between the two countries should also be noted. The more liberal-type Swiss healthcare systems appeared to shape income-related screening inequalities, while education appeared to be a stronger determinant of never- and under-screening in Belgium.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Vladimir Jolidon
- Institute of Sociological Research, University of Geneva, 40 Bd du Pont-d'Arve, 1211, Genève 4, Switzerland.
| | - Vincent De Prez
- Department of Sociology, Ghent University, Korte Meer 5, 9000, Ghent, Belgium
| | - Barbara Willems
- Department of Sociology, Ghent University, Korte Meer 5, 9000, Ghent, Belgium
| | - Piet Bracke
- Department of Sociology, Ghent University, Korte Meer 5, 9000, Ghent, Belgium
| | - Stéphane Cullati
- Institute of Sociological Research, University of Geneva, 40 Bd du Pont-d'Arve, 1211, Genève 4, Switzerland.,Population Health Laboratory, University of Fribourg, Rte des Arsenaux 41, 1700, Fribourg, Switzerland
| | - Claudine Burton-Jeangros
- Institute of Sociological Research, University of Geneva, 40 Bd du Pont-d'Arve, 1211, Genève 4, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Efficacy of strategies to increase participation in cervical cancer screening: GPs offering self-sampling kits for HPV testing versus recommendations to have a pap smear taken - A randomised controlled trial. PAPILLOMAVIRUS RESEARCH 2020; 9:100194. [PMID: 32179181 PMCID: PMC7090330 DOI: 10.1016/j.pvr.2020.100194] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/08/2019] [Revised: 02/05/2020] [Accepted: 02/05/2020] [Indexed: 01/02/2023]
Abstract
Background Cervical cancer is preventable by early detection and treatment of pre-cancerous lesions. The current screening policy in Belgium (3-yearly cytology on Pap smears) covers 60% of the target population. Offering self-samples by GPs can overcome barriers for women who are currently not screened. Methods Women aged 25–64 who did not have a Pap smear since three years and consulted a GP practice in a Flemish municipality between November 2014 and April 2015 were allocated in a 1:1 ratio to either the intervention arm where women were given a vaginal self-sampling kit or control arm where women were encouraged to make an appointment for having a Pap smear taken by a clinician. Results Eighty-eight consenting women were randomised. 35 (78%) out of 45 women in the self-sampling arm participated in screening compared to 22 (51%) out of 43 women in the control arm (p = 0.009). This difference remained significant after adjusting for covariates (age category, education level, time interval since last Pap smear, past Pap smear-taker). Conclusion GPs offering self-sampling kits resulted in a high participation. Larger trials should confirm this effect and evaluate feasibility of this approach.4.
The authors would also like to include the following sentence in the acknowledgement
“The laboratory AML (Antwerp, Belgium) is acknowledged for the free HPV testing on the self-samples."
Collapse
|
7
|
Arbyn M, Smith SB, Temin S, Sultana F, Castle P. Detecting cervical precancer and reaching underscreened women by using HPV testing on self samples: updated meta-analyses. BMJ 2018; 363:k4823. [PMID: 30518635 PMCID: PMC6278587 DOI: 10.1136/bmj.k4823] [Citation(s) in RCA: 428] [Impact Index Per Article: 71.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of high-risk human papillomavirus (hrHPV) assays on self samples and the efficacy of self sampling strategies to reach underscreened women. DESIGN Updated meta-analysis. DATA SOURCES Medline (PubMed), Embase, and CENTRAL from 1 January 2013 to 15 April 2018 (accuracy review), and 1 January 2014 to 15 April 2018 (participation review). REVIEW METHODS Accuracy review: hrHPV assay on a vaginal self sample and a clinician sample; and verification of the presence of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 2 or worse (CIN2+) by colposcopy and biopsy in all enrolled women or in women with positive tests. Participation review: study population included women who were irregularly or never screened; women in the self sampling arm (intervention arm) were invited to collect a self sample for hrHPV testing; women in the control arm were invited or reminded to undergo a screening test on a clinician sample; participation in both arms was documented; and a population minimum of 400 women. RESULTS 56 accuracy studies and 25 participation trials were included. hrHPV assays based on polymerase chain reaction were as sensitive on self samples as on clinician samples to detect CIN2+ or CIN3+ (pooled ratio 0.99, 95% confidence interval 0.97 to 1.02). However, hrHPV assays based on signal amplification were less sensitive on self samples (pooled ratio 0.85, 95% confidence interval 0.80 to 0.89). The specificity to exclude CIN2+ was 2% or 4% lower on self samples than on clinician samples, for hrHPV assays based on polymerase chain reaction or signal amplification, respectively. Mailing self sample kits to the woman's home address generated higher response rates to have a sample taken by a clinician than invitation or reminder letters (pooled relative participation in intention-to-treat-analysis of 2.33, 95% confidence interval 1.86 to 2.91). Opt-in strategies where women had to request a self sampling kit were generally not more effective than invitation letters (relative participation of 1.22, 95% confidence interval 0.93 to 1.61). Direct offer of self sampling devices to women in communities that were underscreened generated high participation rates (>75%). Substantial interstudy heterogeneity was noted (I2>95%). CONCLUSIONS When used with hrHPV assays based on polymerase chain reaction, testing on self samples was similarly accurate as on clinician samples. Offering self sampling kits generally is more effective in reaching underscreened women than sending invitations. However, since response rates are highly variable among settings, pilots should be set up before regional or national roll out of self sampling strategies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marc Arbyn
- Unit of Cancer Epidemiology, Belgian Cancer Centre, Sciensano, J Wytsmanstreet 14, B1050 Brussels, Belgium
| | - Sara B Smith
- Global Coalition Against Cervical Cancer, Durham, NC, USA
| | - Sarah Temin
- Department of Cancer Policy and Advocacy, American Society of Clinical Oncology, Alexandria, VA, USA
| | - Farhana Sultana
- Centre for Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Melbourne School of Population and Global Health, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia
- Registries and Research, Victorian Cytology Service Registries, Victorian Cytology Service Ltd, Carlton South, Australia
| | - Philip Castle
- Global Coalition Against Cervical Cancer, Durham, NC, USA
- Department of Epidemiology and Population Health, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, NY, USA
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Willems B, Bracke P. The impact of regional screening policies on the diffusion of cancer screening participation in Belgium: time trends in educational inequalities in Flanders and Wallonia. BMC Health Serv Res 2018; 18:943. [PMID: 30514273 PMCID: PMC6280447 DOI: 10.1186/s12913-018-3746-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/14/2018] [Accepted: 11/21/2018] [Indexed: 01/16/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND We investigate whether the extent of educational inequalities in the use of Pap smears (cervical cancer screening) and mammograms (breast cancer screening) in Belgium has changed over time in accordance with the pattern predicted by diffusion of innovation theory, as well as how the regional cancer screening policies of Flanders and Wallonia influence this pattern. METHODS Data were obtained from five successive cross-sectional waves (1997-2001-2004-2008-2013) of the Belgian Health Interview Survey. Final sample sizes consisted of 8988 women aged 25-64 years for cervical cancer screening and 4194 women aged 50-69 years for breast cancer screening. We calculated absolute and relative measures of inequality, more specifically, the slope index of inequality (SII) and the relative index of inequality (RII), and their development over time. RESULTS In both Flanders and Wallonia, mammogram use increased greatly between 1997 and 2013, while Pap smear use has remained quite stable over time. Educational inequalities in cervical-cancer screening have been largely persistent over time in both regions. In contrast, educational inequalities in breast cancer screening fluctuated more between 1997 and 2013. Between 1997 and 2001, when the breast cancer screening programme was implemented in Flanders, RII reduced significantly by 45%. Inequality measures did not change significantly in Wallonia, where it is known that most women are screened opportunistically outside the programme. CONCLUSIONS By focussing on Belgium, this study demonstrates that regional variations in the support of a national screening programme can result in regional variations in the pattern of diffusion for cancer screening, as well as to the development of inequalities in cancer screening participation. Moreover, the findings demonstrate that high visibility and awareness of the screening programme, as was more the case in Flanders than it was in Wallonia, are required in order to reduce or eliminate educational inequalities in cancer screening participation over time. General practitioners and gynaecologists can play a decisive role in this regard.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Barbara Willems
- Health and Demographic Research, Department of Sociology, Ghent University, Korte Meer 5, 9000, Ghent, Belgium.
| | - Piet Bracke
- Health and Demographic Research, Department of Sociology, Ghent University, Korte Meer 5, 9000, Ghent, Belgium
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Gianino MM, Lenzi J, Bonaudo M, Fantini MP, Siliquini R, Ricciardi W, Damiani G. Organized screening programmes for breast and cervical cancer in 17 EU countries: trajectories of attendance rates. BMC Public Health 2018; 18:1236. [PMID: 30400786 PMCID: PMC6220470 DOI: 10.1186/s12889-018-6155-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 44] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/25/2018] [Accepted: 10/26/2018] [Indexed: 11/17/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The aim was to analyse participation trajectories in organised breast and cervical cancer screening programmes and the association between socioeconomic variables and participation. METHODS A pooled, cross-sectional, time series analysis was used to evaluate secondary data from 17 European countries in 2004-2014. RESULTS The results show that the mammographic screening trend decreases after an initial increase (coefficient for the linear term = 0.40; p = 0.210; 95% CI = - 0.25, 1.06; coefficient for the quadratic term = - 0.07; p = 0.027; 95% CI = - 0.14, - 0.01), while the cervical screening trend is essentially stable (coefficient for the linear term = 0.39, p = 0.312, 95% CI = - 0.42, 1.20; coefficient for the quadratic term = 0.02, p = 0.689, 95% CI = - 0.07, 0.10). There is a significant difference among the country-specific slopes for breast and cervical cancer screening (SD = 16.7, p < 0.001; SD = 14.4, p < 0.001, respectively). No association is found between participation rate and educational level, income, type of employment, unemployment and preventive expenditure. However, participation in cervical cancer screening is significantly associated with a higher proportion of younger women (≤ 49 years) and a higher Gini index (that is, higher income inequality). CONCLUSIONS In conclusion three messages: organized cancer screening programmes may reduce the socioeconomic inequalities in younger people's use of preventive services over time; socioeconomic variables are not related to participation rates; these rates do not reach a level of stability in several countries. Therefore, without effective recruitment strategies and tailored organizations, screening participation may not achieve additional gains.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Maria Michela Gianino
- Department of Public Health Sciences and Pediatrics, Università di Torino, Via Santena 5 bis, 10126 Turin, Italy
| | - Jacopo Lenzi
- Department of Biomedical and Neuromotor Sciences, Alma Mater Studiorum - Università di Bologna, Via Ugo Foscolo 7, 40123 Bologna, Italy
| | - Marco Bonaudo
- Department of Public Health Sciences and Pediatrics, Università di Torino, Via Santena 5 bis, 10126 Turin, Italy
| | - Maria Pia Fantini
- Department of Biomedical and Neuromotor Sciences, Alma Mater Studiorum - Università di Bologna, Via Ugo Foscolo 7, 40123 Bologna, Italy
| | - Roberta Siliquini
- Department of Public Health Sciences and Pediatrics, Università di Torino, Via Santena 5 bis, 10126 Turin, Italy
| | - Walter Ricciardi
- Fondazione Policlinico Universitario ‘Agostino Gemelli’ IRCSS, Largo Agostino Gemelli 8, 00168 Roma, Italy
- Istituto di Sanità Pubblica, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Largo Francesco Vito 1, 00168 Roma, Italy
| | - Gianfranco Damiani
- Fondazione Policlinico Universitario ‘Agostino Gemelli’ IRCSS, Largo Agostino Gemelli 8, 00168 Roma, Italy
- Istituto di Sanità Pubblica, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Largo Francesco Vito 1, 00168 Roma, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Reducing overuse of cervical cancer screening: A systematic review. Prev Med 2018; 116:51-59. [PMID: 30149037 DOI: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2018.08.027] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/05/2018] [Revised: 08/08/2018] [Accepted: 08/21/2018] [Indexed: 12/18/2022]
Abstract
Overuse of clinical preventive services increases healthcare costs and may deprive underserved patients of necessary care. Up to 45% of cervical cancer screening is overuse. We conducted a systematic review of correlates of overuse of cervical cancer screening and interventions to reduce overuse. The search identified 25 studies (20 observational; 5 intervention). Correlates varied by the type of overuse measured (i.e., too frequent, before/after recommended age to start or stop screening, after hysterectomy), the most common correlates of overuse related to patient age (n = 7), OBGYN practice or provider (n = 5), location (n = 4), and marital status (n = 4). Six observational studies reported a decrease in overuse over time. Screening overuse decreased in all intervention studies, which used before-after designs with no control or comparison groups. Observational studies suggest potential targets for de-escalating overuse. Randomized clinical trials are needed to establish best practices for reducing overuse.
Collapse
|
11
|
Cervical morbidity in Alsace, France: results from a regional organized cervical cancer screening program. Eur J Cancer Prev 2017; 28:33-39. [PMID: 29135538 PMCID: PMC6296848 DOI: 10.1097/cej.0000000000000415] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/20/2023]
Abstract
In 1994, a pilot program of cervical cancer screening was introduced in the Alsace region, France. Women aged 25-65 years were proposed to have one Pap smear every 3 years. The objective was to assess cervical morbidity in Alsace before the human papillomavirus vaccinated population reaches the age of screening. Data on cervical lesions and cancers were collected by EVE for the period September 2008 to August 2011 from existing medical services and cytopathology laboratories in Alsace. Cytological and histological data were completed with data from the two cancer registries covering the region (Bas-Rhin and Haut-Rhin). Cancer incidence rates were computed for the target population (truncated to 25-64 years) and were age standardized according to the world reference population. World standardized incidence rates for the whole female population were obtained from the two cancer registries. During 2008-2011, 565 153 smears were performed in 498 913 women aged 25-64 years, representing an average of 1.13 smears/woman and 1.62 smears/screened woman. The overall screening coverage was 70.1% over the 3-year period. Histologically confirmed high-grade lesions were found in 2303 women (0.5%). Moreover, 215 cervical cancers were reported among women aged 25-64 years (crude and standardized truncated incidence rate of 10.6 and 10.0/100 000 women-years, respectively). The overall screening coverage of 70% at 3 years is higher than the national rate (57%), and the overall cancer incidence of 5.5/100 000 is below the national French level. The EVE database will be useful to assess trends in cervical morbidity over time and to further assess the effect of screening as well as of human papillomavirus vaccination.
Collapse
|
12
|
The impact on women's health and the cervical cancer screening budget of primary HPV screening with dual-stain cytology triage in Belgium. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 2017; 212:171-181. [PMID: 28081908 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2017.01.010] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/29/2016] [Revised: 12/30/2016] [Accepted: 01/04/2017] [Indexed: 11/21/2022]
Abstract
Dual stain cytology, or "diagnostic cytology", offers a significant increase in sensitivity compared to cytology, with a slight decrease in specificity. This can reduce additional investigations like colposcopies, biopsies, and follow-up visits. Cervical cancer screening for women between 25 and 65 years of age with diagnostic cytology is estimated to reduce the incidence of cervical cancer by 36% and reduce annual cervical cancer mortalities by 40%. The reduced number of screening visits and the decrease in incidence and mortality will improve quality of life. In this article, a model was created to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of diagnostic cytology for Belgium. In this approach, precancerous cells are more likely to be immediately identified during the first screening visit. This reduces both the number and frequency of follow-up visits required. After two cycles (6 years), the prevalence of CIN and cervical cancer is decreased significantly in the screened population. At a population level, these shifts can reduce the screening budget by 21%, resulting in savings of 5.3 million euro a year in Belgium. Diagnostic cytology benefits all stakeholders involved in cervical cancer screening.
Collapse
|
13
|
Haelens A, Roche L, Bastos J, Woronoff AS, Zorzi M, Francart J. Trends in net survival from cervical cancer in six European Latin countries: results from the SUDCAN population-based study. Eur J Cancer Prev 2017; 26 Trends in cancer net survival in six European Latin Countries: the SUDCAN study:S92-S99. [PMID: 28005611 DOI: 10.1097/cej.0000000000000292] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
Abstract
Cancer survival is a key measure of the effectiveness of a healthcare system. As differences in healthcare systems are present among European Latin countries, it is of interest to look specifically at their similarities and differences in terms of cancer survival. Incident cases were extracted from the EUROCARE-V database for France, Italy, Spain, Switzerland, Portugal, and Belgium. One and 5-year net survivals (NS) were calculated for the period 2000-2004 using the Pohar-Perme estimator. Trends in NS over the 1992-2004 period and changes in the pattern of cancer excess mortality rate until 5 years after diagnosis were examined using a multivariate excess mortality rate model. There were moderate differences in age-standardized NS between countries (5-year NS range: 83-88%), but significant differences in the age groups 15-54 and 55-74 years (at 5 years up to +16 and +18% between any two countries). During the study period, excess mortality and NS improved in Italy, Spain, and Portugal. In Italy and Portugal, this improvement was slightly similar at ages 40, 55, and 70 whereas, in Spain, there was a sharp increase in NS at age 55. Because of this improvement, excess mortality and NS were similar in all six countries in 2004. Excess mortality peaked around 1 year after diagnosis in the youngest ages, but decreased gradually in the elderly. Detailed analyses showed differences in excess mortality and NS from cervical cancer between European Latin countries. However, these differences decreased over the study period because of the considerable improvement in Spain, Italy, and Portugal.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Annemie Haelens
- aBelgian Cancer Registry, rue Royale, Brussels, Belgium bDepartment of Biostatistics, University Hospital of Lyon cCNRS, UMR 5558, Biometry and Evolutionary Biology Laboratory (LBBE), BioMaths-Health Department, Villeurbanne dUniversity of Lyon 1, Lyon, France eRegional Oncology Registry of the Centre, Portuguese Oncology Institute of Coimbra fDoubs and Belfort Territory Cancer Registry, EA3181, University Hospital of Besançon, Besançon gVeneto Tumour Registry, Veneto Region, Padua, Italy
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
14
|
Arbyn M, Vanden Broeck D, Bogers J, Van Damme P, Temmerman M, Weyers S. Enrolment of young women attending cervical cancer screening to survey effectiveness of HPV vaccination. Cancer Epidemiol 2016; 45:178-179. [PMID: 27847177 DOI: 10.1016/j.canep.2016.10.017] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/25/2016] [Accepted: 10/27/2016] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Marc Arbyn
- Unit of Cancer Epidemiology/Belgian Cancer Centre, Scientific Institute of Public Health, Brussels, Belgium.
| | - Davy Vanden Broeck
- International Centre for Reproductive Health (ICRH), Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium; Algemeen Medisch Labo, Sonic Healthcare, Antwerp, Belgium; AMBIOR, Laboratory for Cell Biology & Histology, University of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium; National Reference Center for HPV, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Johannes Bogers
- International Centre for Reproductive Health (ICRH), Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium; Algemeen Medisch Labo, Sonic Healthcare, Antwerp, Belgium; AMBIOR, Laboratory for Cell Biology & Histology, University of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium; National Reference Center for HPV, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Pierre Van Damme
- Vaccine & Infectious Disease Institute (VAXINFECTIO), Antwerp University, Antwerp, Belgium
| | - Marleen Temmerman
- International Centre for Reproductive Health (ICRH), Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium; Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium
| | - Steven Weyers
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Tjalma WAA. There is no point in cervical cancer screening below 25 years of age. Cancer Epidemiol 2016; 45:177. [PMID: 27843118 DOI: 10.1016/j.canep.2016.10.018] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/08/2016] [Accepted: 10/27/2016] [Indexed: 10/20/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Wiebren A A Tjalma
- Multidisciplinary Breast Clinic, Unit Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Antwerp University Hospital, University of Antwerp, Wilrijkstraat 10, 2650 Edegem, Belgium.
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Zanotta N, Tornesello ML, Annunziata C, Stellato G, Buonaguro FM, Comar M. Candidate Soluble Immune Mediators in Young Women with High-Risk Human Papillomavirus Infection: High Expression of Chemokines Promoting Angiogenesis and Cell Proliferation. PLoS One 2016; 11:e0151851. [PMID: 26990868 PMCID: PMC4798492 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0151851] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/25/2015] [Accepted: 03/04/2016] [Indexed: 01/20/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The causal interpretation of cervical immune response to Human Papillomavirus (HPV) infection is complex and poorly characterized mainly due to the delicate balance that exists between viral infection, increase of inflammatory cytokines and host risk factors. This study aims to explore the significance of cervical immune mediators associated to cell survival, angiogenesis and interaction with immune response, in predicting the risk to develop HPV-related intraepithelial lesions. METHODS A panel of 48 cytokines and growth factors were explored in a selected cohort of 168 immunocompetent women including 88 diagnosed with low (LSIL) or high (HSIL) squamous intraepithelial lesions of the cervix and 80 with normal cervical cytology (NIL). HPV genotyping was performed by Linear Array HPV test and the soluble concentration of 48 immune molecules was analyzed using the Bio-Plex platform. RESULTS The prevalence of single HR-HPV infection was 30% in NIL and 100% in LSIL and HSIL women. The expression of 13 cytokines, including interleukins IL-6, IL-3, IL-12p40, IL-12p70, IL-16, IL-18, LIF, of chemokines CCL7 (MCP-3), CXCL9 (MIG), CXCL12 (SDF-1α) and of the tropic factors VEGF, G-CSF, M-CSF were significantly associated with the presence of infection, with levels being higher in women with precancerous lesions compared to NIL HPV negative women. Only the growth factor GM-CSF was positively associated with the cytological abnormalities. CONCLUSIONS The ability of HR-HPV to escape from innate immune recognition and to orchestrate the production of specific inflammatory and growth factors, involved in early inflammatory response and in the cell-proliferating phase of intraepithelial damage, was documented in women before the development of cervical lesions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nunzia Zanotta
- Institute for Maternal and Child Health – IRCCS “Burlo Garofolo”, Trieste, Italy
| | - Maria Lina Tornesello
- Molecular Biology and Viral Oncology Division, Istituto Nazionale Tumori IRCCS – “Fond. Pascale,” Napoli, Italy
| | - Clorinda Annunziata
- Molecular Biology and Viral Oncology Division, Istituto Nazionale Tumori IRCCS – “Fond. Pascale,” Napoli, Italy
| | - Giovanni Stellato
- Gynecology Oncology Division, Istituto Nazionale Tumori IRCCS – “Fond. Pascale,” Napoli, Italy
| | - Franco Maria Buonaguro
- Molecular Biology and Viral Oncology Division, Istituto Nazionale Tumori IRCCS – “Fond. Pascale,” Napoli, Italy
| | - Manola Comar
- Institute for Maternal and Child Health – IRCCS “Burlo Garofolo”, Trieste, Italy
- Department of Medical Sciences, University of Trieste, Trieste, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Myriokefalitaki E, Potdar N, Barnfield L, Davies Q, Moss EL. Cervical cancer still presents symptomatically 20 years after the introduction of a structured national screening programme. Cytopathology 2016; 27:229-36. [PMID: 26919275 DOI: 10.1111/cyt.12315] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 11/18/2015] [Indexed: 12/01/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To investigate the pattern of presentation of cervical cancer and to identify the characteristics of women who present symptomatically with cervical cancer. METHODS A retrospective study of all cervical cancer cases diagnosed over a 4-year period. Details of mode of presentation, stage at diagnosis and cytological/gynaecological history were collated. RESULTS In total, 148 cases were identified with a median age of 46 years (range, 20-91 years). In this population, 112 (75.7%) women were within the screening age range. Forty-eight (33.6%) were asymptomatic at diagnosis and presented through the colposcopy clinic. All asymptomatic women (100%) had stage I disease at diagnosis, compared with 37.2% of the symptomatic group (P < 0.001). Postmenopausal bleeding was the most common presenting symptom (33%), followed by postcoital bleeding (14.2%), intermenstrual bleeding (12.2%) and increased vaginal discharge (3.4%). The majority of symptomatic women presented through colposcopy, gynaecological oncology or gynaecology clinics (87.6%); however, 6.5% presented through the emergency department. Women who presented symptomatically were significantly older than asymptomatic women (54.9 versus 38.1 years, P < 0.001). Women at risk of social isolation (non-English speakers, alcohol abusers, heavy smokers, receiving treatment for psychiatric disease) were more likely to present with symptoms, through the emergency department and with advanced disease at diagnosis (stage II+) (P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS A review of local cervical cancer cases can highlight areas of weakness in a screening programme and can identify populations who are at risk in presenting symptomatically with advanced disease.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - N Potdar
- University Hospitals of Leicester, Leicester, UK
| | - L Barnfield
- University Hospitals of Leicester, Leicester, UK
| | - Q Davies
- University Hospitals of Leicester, Leicester, UK
| | - E L Moss
- University Hospitals of Leicester, Leicester, UK
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Arbyn M, Broeck DV, Benoy I, Bogers J, Depuydt C, Praet M, Sutter PD, Hoorens A, Hauben E, Poppe W, Van Ranst M, Delvenne P, Gofflot S, Pétein M, Engelen F, Vanneste A, Beeck LOD, Damme PV, Temmerman M, Weyers S. Surveillance of effects of HPV vaccination in Belgium. Cancer Epidemiol 2016; 41:152-8. [PMID: 26895623 DOI: 10.1016/j.canep.2015.12.011] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/31/2015] [Revised: 11/19/2015] [Accepted: 12/22/2015] [Indexed: 01/27/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Early effects of HPV (human papillomavirus) vaccination are reflected by changes observable in young women attending cervical cancer screening. SUBJECT AND METHODS The SEHIB study included HPV geno-typing of ∼6000 continuous and 650 pathological cervical cell specimen as well as biopsies, collected from women in Belgium in 2010-2014. Data were linked to vaccination status. RESULTS HPV vaccination offered protection among women aged <30years against infection with HPV16 (vaccine effectiveness [VE]=67%, 95% CI: 48-79%), HPV18 (VE=93%, 95% CI: 52-99%), and high-risk HPV (VE=16%, 95% CI: 2-29%). Vaccination protected also against cytological lesions. Vaccination protected against histologically confirmed lesions: significantly lower absolute risks of CIN1+ (risk difference [RD]=-1.6%, 95% CI: -2.6% to -0.7%) and CIN3+ associated with HPV16/18 (RD=-0.3%, 95% CI -0.6% to -0.1%). Vaccine effectiveness decreased with age. Protection against HPV16 and 18 infection was significant in all age groups, however no protection was observed against cytological lesions associated with these types in age-group 25-29. CONCLUSION The SEHIB study demonstrates the effectiveness of HPV vaccination in Belgian young women in particular in age group 18-19. Declining effectiveness with increasing age may be explained by higher tendency of women already exposed to infection to get the vaccine.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marc Arbyn
- Unit of Cancer Epidemiology/Belgian Cancer Centre, Scientific Institute of Public Health, J. Wytsmanstreet 14, B1050 Brussels, Belgium.
| | - Davy Vanden Broeck
- International Centre for Reproductive Health (ICRH), Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium; Algemeen Medisch Labo, Sonic Healtcare, Antwerp, Belgium; AMBIOR, Laboratory for Cell Biology & Histology, University of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium
| | - Ina Benoy
- Algemeen Medisch Labo, Sonic Healtcare, Antwerp, Belgium; AMBIOR, Laboratory for Cell Biology & Histology, University of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium
| | - Johannes Bogers
- Algemeen Medisch Labo, Sonic Healtcare, Antwerp, Belgium; AMBIOR, Laboratory for Cell Biology & Histology, University of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium
| | | | - Marleen Praet
- N. Goormachtigh Institute for Pathology, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium
| | - Philippe De Sutter
- Department of Gynaecology & Oncology, UZ Brussel, Free University of Brussels, Brussels, Belgium
| | | | | | - Willy Poppe
- Department of Gynaecology and Obstetrics, UZ Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Marc Van Ranst
- Department of Microbiology and Immunology, Rega Institute, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | | | | | - Michel Pétein
- Institut de Pathologie et de Génétique, Charlerloi, Belgium
| | | | | | | | - Pierre Van Damme
- Vaccine & Infectious Disease Institute (VAXINFECTIO), Antwerp University, Antwerp, Belgium
| | - Marleen Temmerman
- International Centre for Reproductive Health (ICRH), Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium; Reproductive Health and Research, World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland; Department of Gynaecology and Obstetrics, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium
| | - Steven Weyers
- Department of Gynaecology and Obstetrics, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Richard A, Rohrmann S, Schmid SM, Tirri BF, Huang DJ, Güth U, Eichholzer M. Lifestyle and health-related predictors of cervical cancer screening attendance in a Swiss population-based study. Cancer Epidemiol 2015; 39:870-6. [DOI: 10.1016/j.canep.2015.09.009] [Citation(s) in RCA: 23] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/22/2015] [Revised: 09/15/2015] [Accepted: 09/16/2015] [Indexed: 10/22/2022]
|
20
|
Verdoodt F, Jentschke M, Hillemanns P, Racey CS, Snijders PJF, Arbyn M. Reaching women who do not participate in the regular cervical cancer screening programme by offering self-sampling kits: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised trials. Eur J Cancer 2015; 51:2375-85. [PMID: 26296294 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejca.2015.07.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 205] [Impact Index Per Article: 22.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/22/2015] [Revised: 06/17/2015] [Accepted: 07/14/2015] [Indexed: 10/23/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Population coverage for cervical cancer screening is an important determinant explaining differences in the incidence of cervical cancer between countries. Offering devices for self-sampling has the potential to increase participation of hard-to-reach women. METHODS A systematic review and meta-analysis were performed to evaluate the participation after an invitation including a self-sampling device (self-sampling arm) versus an invitation to have a sample taken by a health professional (control arm), sent to under-screened women. RESULTS Sixteen randomised studies were found eligible. In an intention-to-treat analysis, the pooled participation in the self-sampling arm was 23.6% (95% confidence interval (CI)=20.2-27.3%), when self-sampling kits were sent by mail to all women, versus 10.3% (95% CI=6.2-15.2%) in the control arm (participation difference: 12.6% [95% CI=9.3-15.9]). When women had to opt-in to receive the self-sampling device, as used in three studies, the pooled participation was not higher in the self-sampling compared to the control arm (participation difference: 0.2% [95% CI=-4.5-4.9%]). CONCLUSION An increased participation was observed in the self-sampling arm compared to the control arm, if self-sampling kits were sent directly to women at their home address. However, the size of the effect varied substantially among studies. Since participation was similar in both arms when women had to opt-in, future studies are warranted to discern opt-in scenarios that are most acceptable to women.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- F Verdoodt
- Belgian Cancer Centre/Unit of Cancer Epidemiology, Scientific Institute of Public Health, J. Wytsmanstraat 14, 1050 Brussels, Belgium
| | - M Jentschke
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Hannover Medical School, Carl-Neuberg-Str, 1, 30625 Hannover, Germany
| | - P Hillemanns
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Hannover Medical School, Carl-Neuberg-Str, 1, 30625 Hannover, Germany
| | - C S Racey
- Dalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, 155 College Street , 6th Floor, Toronto, Ontario M5T3M7, Canada
| | - P J F Snijders
- Department of Pathology, VU University medical center, De Boelelaan 1117, 1081 HV Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - M Arbyn
- Belgian Cancer Centre/Unit of Cancer Epidemiology, Scientific Institute of Public Health, J. Wytsmanstraat 14, 1050 Brussels, Belgium.
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Depuydt CE, Verstraete L, Berth M, Beert J, Bogers JP, Salembier G, Vereecken AJ, Bosmans E. Human Papillomavirus Positivity in Women Undergoing Intrauterine Insemination Has a Negative Effect on Pregnancy Rates. Gynecol Obstet Invest 2015; 81:41-6. [DOI: 10.1159/000434749] [Citation(s) in RCA: 28] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/09/2015] [Accepted: 06/02/2015] [Indexed: 11/19/2022]
|
22
|
Nowakowski A, Cybulski M, Śliwczyński A, Chil A, Teter Z, Seroczyński P, Arbyn M, Anttila A. The implementation of an organised cervical screening programme in Poland: an analysis of the adherence to European guidelines. BMC Cancer 2015; 15:279. [PMID: 25879466 PMCID: PMC4417537 DOI: 10.1186/s12885-015-1242-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 24] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/14/2014] [Accepted: 03/21/2015] [Indexed: 01/22/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Well-organised quality-controlled screening can substantially reduce the burden of cervical cancer (CC). European guidelines (EuG) for quality assurance in CC screening provide guidance on all aspects of an organised screening programme. Organised CC screening in Poland was introduced in 2007. The purpose of our study was to analyse: (i) adherence of the programme to EuG; (ii) programme process and performance indicators; (iii) impact of the programme on the incidence of and mortality from CC. METHODS Available data on the policy, structure and functioning of the Polish programme were compared with the major points of the EuG. Data on the process, and available performance indicators were drawn from the screening database and other National Health Fund (NHF) systems. Joinpoint regression was used to assess changes in CC incidence and mortality trends. RESULTS The Polish programme adheres partially to EuG in terms of policy and organisation. Only a limited set of performance indicators can be calculated due to screening database incompleteness or lack of linkage between existing databases. The screening database does not include opportunistic smears collected within NHF-reimbursed or private care. The organised programme coverage rate fluctuated from 21% to 27% between 2007-2013. In 2012 the coverage reached 35% after combining both organised and opportunistic smears reimbursed by the NHF. In 2012 the number of smears reimbursed by NHF was 60% higher in opportunistic than in organised screening with significant overlap. Data from the private sector are not recorded. Depending on years, 30-50% of women referred for colposcopy/biopsy because of abnormal Pap smears were managed within the programme. The age-standardised CC incidence and mortality dropped linearly between 1999 and 2011 without evidence of a period effect. CONCLUSIONS The Polish organised cervical screening programme is only partially adherent to evidence-based EuG. Its implementation has not influenced the burden of CC in the country so far. Changes with special focus on increasing coverage, development of information systems and assessment of quality are required to increase programme adherence to EuG and to measure its effectiveness. Our findings may be useful to improve the Polish programme and those implemented or planned in other countries.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Andrzej Nowakowski
- Department of Gynaecology and Oncologic Gynaecology, Military Institute of Medicine, ul. Szaserów 128, 04-141, Warsaw 44, Poland.
| | - Marek Cybulski
- Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Medical University of Lublin, ul. Chodźki 1, 20-093, Lublin, Poland.
| | - Andrzej Śliwczyński
- National Health Fund, Central Office, ul. Grójecka 186, 02-390, Warsaw, Poland.
| | - Arkadiusz Chil
- Department of Oncologic Gynaecology, Regional Coordinating Office for Cervical and Breast Cancer Prevention Programmes, Świętokrzyskie Cancer Centre, ul. Artwińskiego 3, 25-734, Kielce, Poland.
| | - Zbigniew Teter
- National Health Fund, Central Office, ul. Grójecka 186, 02-390, Warsaw, Poland.
| | | | - Marc Arbyn
- Unit of Cancer Epidemiology & Belgian Cancer Centre, Scientific Institute of Public Health, Juliette Wytsman Street, 14, B1050, Brussels, Belgium.
| | - Ahti Anttila
- Finnish Cancer Registry, Unioninkatu 22, FI-00130, Helsinki, Finland.
| |
Collapse
|