Deriving high-resolution protein backbone structure propensities from all crystal data using the information maximization device

Interplay between Conformational Strain and Intramolecular Interaction in Protein Structures: Which of Them Is Evolutionarily Conserved?

By computing strain energies of peptide fragments within protein structures and their intramolecular interaction energies, we attempt to reveal general biophysical trends behind the secondary structure formation in the context of protein evolution. Our "protein basis set" consisted of 1143 representatives of different folds obtained from curated SCOPe database, and for each member of the set, the strain and intramolecular energy was calculated on the "rolling tripeptide" basis, employing the DFT-D3/COSMO-RS method for the former and the QM-calibrated force field method (MM) for the latter. The calculated data, strain and interactions, were correlated with the conservation of amino acid residues in secondary structure elements and also with the level of the residue burial within the protein three-dimensional structure. It allowed us to formulate several observations concerning fundamental differences between two main secondary structure motifs: α-helices and β-strands. We have shown that a strong interaction is one of the determining characteristics of the β-sheet formation, at least at the level of tripeptides (and likely penta- or heptapeptides, too), and that the β-strand is a prevailing secondary structure in the strongly-interacting regions of the protein folds conserved by evolution. On the other hand, low strain was neither proven to be an important physicochemical property conserved by evolution nor does it correlate with the propensity for the α-helix and β-strand. Finally, it has been demonstrated that the strong interaction has a certain level of connection with residue burial; however, we demonstrate that these two characteristics should be rather regarded as two complementary factors. These findings represent an important contribution to understanding protein folding from first principles, which is a complementary approach to ongoing efforts to solve the protein folding problem by knowledge-based approaches and machine-learning.

Reduced alphabet of prebiotic amino acids optimally encodes the conformational space of diverse extant protein folds

Background

There is wide agreement that only a subset of the twenty standard amino acids existed prebiotically in sufficient concentrations to form functional polypeptides. We ask how this subset, postulated as {A,D,E,G,I,L,P,S,T,V}, could have formed structures stable enough to found metabolic pathways. Inspired by alphabet reduction experiments, we undertook a computational analysis to measure the structural coding behavior of sequences simplified by reduced alphabets. We sought to discern characteristics of the prebiotic set that would endow it with unique properties relevant to structure, stability, and folding.

Results

Drawing on a large dataset of single-domain proteins, we employed an information-theoretic measure to assess how well the prebiotic amino acid set preserves fold information against all other possible ten-amino acid sets. An extensive virtual mutagenesis procedure revealed that the prebiotic set excellently preserves sequence-dependent information regarding both backbone conformation and tertiary contact matrix of proteins. We observed that information retention is fold-class dependent: the prebiotic set sufficiently encodes the structure space of α/β and α + β folds, and to a lesser extent, of all-α and all-β folds. The prebiotic set appeared insufficient to encode the small proteins. Assessing how well the prebiotic set discriminates native vs. incorrect sequence-structure matches, we found that α/β and α + β folds exhibit more pronounced energy gaps with the prebiotic set than with nearly all alternatives.

Conclusions

The prebiotic set optimally encodes local backbone structures that appear in the folded environment and near-optimally encodes the tertiary contact matrix of extant proteins. The fold-class-specific patterns observed from our structural analysis confirm the postulated timeline of fold appearance in proteogenesis derived from proteomic sequence analyses. Polypeptides arising in a prebiotic environment will likely form α/β and α + β-like folds if any at all. We infer that the progressive expansion of the alphabet allowed the increased conformational stability and functional specificity of later folds, including all-α, all-β, and small proteins. Our results suggest that prebiotic sequences are amenable to mutations that significantly lower native conformational energies and increase discrimination amidst incorrect folds. This property may have assisted the genesis of functional proto-enzymes prior to the expansion of the full amino acid alphabet.

Beyond basins: φ,ψ preferences of a residue depend heavily on the φ,ψ values of its neighbors

The Ramachandran plot distributions of nonglycine residues from experimentally determined structures are routinely described as grouping into one of six major basins: β, PII , α, αL , ξ and γ'. Recent work describing the most common conformations adopted by pairs of residues in folded proteins [i.e., (φ,ψ)2 -motifs] showed that commonly described major basins are not true single thermodynamic basins, but are composed of distinct subregions that are associated with various conformations of either the preceding or following neighbor residue. Here, as documentation of the extent to which the conformational preferences of a central residue are influenced by the conformations of its two neighbors, we present a set of φ,ψ-plots that are delimited simultaneously by the φ,ψ-angles of its neighboring residues on both sides. The level of influence seen here is typically greater than the influence associated with considering the identities of neighboring residues, implying that the use of this heretofore untapped information can improve the accuracy of structure prediction algorithms and low resolution protein structure refinement.