Blood clot formation does not affect metastasis formation or tumor growth in a murine model of breast cancer

Inhibition of fibronectin accumulation suppresses tumor growth

Understanding how the extracellular matrix affects cancer development constitutes an emerging research field. Fibronectin and collagen are two intriguing matrix components found in cancer. Large concentrations of fibronectin or collagen type I have been implicated in poor prognosis in patients. In a mouse model, we had shown that genetically decreasing circulating fibronectin resulted in smaller tumors. We therefore aimed to manipulate fibronectin pharmacologically and determine how cancer development is affected. Deletion of fibronectin in human breast cancer cells (MDA-MB-231) using shRNA (knockdown: Kd) improved survival and diminished tumor burden in a model of metastatic lesions and in a model of local growth. Based on these findings, it seemed reasonable to attempt to prevent fibronectin accumulation using a bacterial derived peptide called pUR4. Treatment with this peptide for 10 days in the breast cancer local growth model or for 5 days in a melanoma skin cancer model (B16) was associated with a significant suppression of cancer growth. Treatment aimed at inhibiting collagen type I accumulation without interfering with fibronectin could not affect any changes in vivo. In the absence of fibronectin, diminished cancer progression was due to inhibition of proliferation, even though changes in blood vessels were also detected. Decreased proliferation could be attributed to decreased ERK phosphorylation and diminished YAP expression. In summary, manipulating fibronectin diminishes cancer progression, mostly by suppressing cell proliferation. This suggests that matrix modulation could be used as an adjuvant to conventional therapy as long as a decrease in fibronectin is obtained.

Skeletal Metastases of Unknown Primary: Biological Landscape and Clinical Overview

Skeletal metastases of unknown primary (SMUP) represent a clinical challenge in dealing with patients diagnosed with bone metastases. Management of these patients has improved significantly in the past few years. however, it is fraught with a lack of evidence. While some patients have achieved impressive gains, a more systematic and tailored treatment is required. Nevertheless, in real-life practice, the outlook at the beginning of treatment for SMUP is decidedly somber. An incomplete translational relevance of pathological and clinical data on the mortality and morbidity rate has had unsatisfactory consequences for SMUP patients and their physicians. We examined several approaches to confront the available evidence; three key points emerged. The characterization of the SMUP biological profile is essential to driving clinical decisions by integrating genetic and molecular profiles into a multi-step diagnostic work-up. Nonetheless, a pragmatic investigation plan and therapy of SMUP cannot follow a single template; it must be adapted to different pathophysiological dynamics and coordinated with efforts of a systematic algorithm and high-quality data derived from statistically powered clinical trials. The discussion in this review points out that greater efforts are required to face the unmet needs present in SMUP patients in oncology.

A Subpopulation of Stromal Cells Controls Cancer Cell Homing to the Bone Marrow

Breast and prostate cancer cells home to the bone marrow, where they presumably hijack the hematopoietic stem cell niche. We characterize here the elusive premetastatic niche by examining the role of mesenchymal stromal cells (MSC) in cancer cell homing. Decreasing the number of MSC pharmacologically enhanced cancer cell homing to the bone marrow in mice. In contrast, increasing the number of these MSCs by various interventions including G-CSF administration diminished cancer cell homing. The MSC subpopulation that correlated best with cancer cells expressed stem, endothelial, and pericytic cell markers, suggesting these cells represent an undifferentiated component of the niche with vascular commitment. In humans, a MSC subpopulation carrying markers for endothelial and pericytic cells was lower in the presence of cytokeratin⁺ cells in bone marrow. Taken together, our data show that a subpopulation of MSC with both endothelial and pericytic cell surface markers suppresses the homing of cancer cells to the bone marrow. Similar to the presence of cytokeratin⁺ cells in the bone marrow, this MSC subpopulation could prove useful in determining the risk of metastatic disease, and its manipulation might offer a new possibility for diminishing bone metastasis formation.Significance: These findings establish an inverse relationship between a subpopulation of mesenchymal stromal cells and cancer cells in the bone marrow. Cancer Res; 78(1); 129-42. ©2017 AACR.

EDA-Fibronectin Originating from Osteoblasts Inhibits the Immune Response against Cancer

Osteoblasts lining the inner surface of bone support hematopoietic stem cell differentiation by virtue of proximity to the bone marrow. The osteoblasts also modify their own differentiation by producing various isoforms of fibronectin (FN). Despite evidence for immune regulation by osteoblasts, there is limited knowledge of how osteoblasts modulate cells of the immune system. Here, we show that extra domain A (EDA)-FN produced by osteoblasts increases arginase production in myeloid-derived cells, and we identify α5β1 as the mediating receptor. In different mouse models of cancer, osteoblasts or EDA-FN was found to up-regulate arginase-1 expression in myeloid-derived cells, resulting in increased cancer growth. This harmful effect can be reduced by interfering with the integrin α5β1 receptor or inhibiting arginase. Conversely, in tissue injury, the expression of arginase-1 is normally beneficial as it dampens the immune response to allow wound healing. We show that EDA-FN protects against excessive fibrotic tissue formation in a liver fibrosis model. Our results establish an immune regulatory function for EDA-FN originating from the osteoblasts and identify new avenues for enhancing the immune reaction against cancer.

Osteoblasts produce an isoform of fibronectin (EDA-fibronectin) that acts on myeloid cells to increase arginase-1 expression and protect against fibrosis. However, it can also enhance cancer growth; interfering with the interaction between EDA-fibronectin and its receptor diminishes this effect.

Osteoblasts, which are the cells that produce bone, line the inner surface of the bone and are adjacent to the marrow that generates all the different blood cells. Osteoblasts have a close relationship with hematopoiesis, and it has been shown that a transient elimination of osteoblasts leads to the decrease of hematopoietic stem cells and progenitor cells. Fibronectin (FN) is an extracellular matrix protein with a known role in hematopoiesis in vitro that is secreted by osteoblasts. Here, we analyze the role of FN in hematopoiesis and find that an isoform that contains the extra domain A (EDA) and is produced by the osteoblasts affects both the number and future behavior of a subset of immune cells. EDA-FN protects against excessive fibrotic tissue formation in a liver fibrosis model. The same process, however, is detrimental in cancer, because it prevents the organism from mounting a potent immune response against the cancer and induces an increase of cancer growth. Mechanistically, we find that the EDA domain binds to the cell surface receptor α5β1 integrin and enhances the production of the anti-inflammatory and immunosuppressive factor arginase-1. We conclude that EDA-FN production by osteoblasts modulates immune cell behavior, and that interfering with this mechanism opens up new possibilities for enhancing an immune reaction against cancer.