Pharmacokinetics and efficacy of topically applied nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs in retinochoroidal tissues in rabbits

Use of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs in corneal epithelial ingrowth due to traumatic flap dislocation after LASIK: Case report

RATIONALE

Ophthalmologists mainly treat epithelial ingrowth by lifting the flap and scraping the ingrowth or using scraping combined with phototherapeutic keratectomy, mitomycin C, and so on. The potential usefulness of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs in such circumstances has not been reported before.

PATIENT CONCERNS

A 32-year-old man and a 25-year-old man underwent lifting and scraping of the flap and phototherapeutic keratectomy to remove the epithelial ingrowths. Unfortunately, the ingrowths recurred and continued to develop.

DIAGNOSIS

The patients were diagnosed with corneal epithelial ingrowth.

INTERVENTIONS

The administration of bromfenac sodium and fluorometholone eye drops.

OUTCOMES

Epithelial ingrowths in both patients disappeared after 6 and 1 month of treatment, respectively. There were no adverse reactions to the eye drops.

LESSONS

Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs may be broadly applied in the treatment of epithelial ingrowth after laser in situ keratomileusis.

Preparation of polycaprolactone and polymethacrylate nanofibers for controlled ocular delivery of ketorolac tromethamine: Pharmacokinetic study in Rabbit's Eye

Ophthalmitis is an inflammation of the eye triggered by various conditions including diseases, allergy, trauma, or surgery. Management of this condition usually includes administration of topical anti-inflammatory eye drops such as nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs. To overcome the challenges of conventional eye drops such as frequent administration and low intraocular bioavailability, nanofibrous inserts of Ketorolac tromethamine (KET) were developed in this study. Polycaprolactone and polymethacrylate containing KET were electrospun to prepare biocompatible and biodegradable nanofibers. The inserts were studied for morphology, drug-polymer interaction, physicochemical properties, cell viability, in vitro drug release study and pharmacokinetic study in rabbit's eye. Uniform nanofibers with mean diameters < 350 nm were developed. Suitable mechanical properties with tensile strength up to 2.8 MPa indicated high strength and flexibility of inserts. Nanofibers exhibited controlled drug release for up to 140 h at a concentration more than 50 μg/ml in tears without causing any damage or irritation to the eye. Formulations indicated enhanced pharmacokinetics with 6- to 8-times higher Area Under the Curve (AUC0-144) compared to KET eye drop. Acceptable cell viability confirmed the safety of inserts. Due to the fact that this preservative-free polymer insert can obtain therapeutic concentration in the tear film without fluctuation, it can be a suitable alternative for the treatment of intraocular inflammations with less complications, easier use, and even higher intraocular penetration.

Topical Treatment for Retinal Degenerative Pathologies: A Systematic Review

The topical administration of medicines is the preferred route in ocular therapy, at least for the anterior segment of the eye. However, the eye's inherent functional and biological barriers all work against the active pharmaceutical ingredient (API) to efficiently reach the targeted retinal structures. The main objective of this article is to offer a systematic review of the scientific literature in recent years, focusing on the latest developments of topical treatment intended for retinal degenerative diseases. Database search returned 102 clinical studies, focused on topical treatment for age macular degeneration, macular edemas (in diabetic retinopathy, surgery related or in retinal dystrophies) or glaucoma. After the exclusion of low-powered studies and those combining vitreo-retinal surgery, 35 articles remained for analysis. Currently, the topical treatment of retinal degenerative diseases is limited by the difficulty to deliver effective drug concentrations to the posterior eye structures. However, in the case of drug classes like NSAIDs, the presence of certain molecular and metabolic features for specific representatives makes the topical administration currently feasible in several clinical contexts. For other drug classes, either a fine-tuning of the API's pharmacokinetic profile or the use of more advanced formulation strategies, such as rationally designed nanostructured drugs and vehicles, crystalline polymorphs or supramolecular complexes, could bring the much awaited breakthrough for a more predictable and controlled delivery towards the retinal structures and could eventually be employed in the future for the development of more effective ways of delivering drugs to the posterior eye, with the ultimate goal of improving their clinical efficacy.

Comparative Assessment of Short-Term Tendon-Scleral Postoperative Inflammation and α-Smooth Muscle Actin Expression following Oral and Topical Diclofenac Administration for Strabismus Surgery in Rabbits

PURPOSE

Wound healing and fibrosis modulation are considered pivotal for the long-term outcome of strabismus surgery. Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, including diclofenac sodium, are inflammation suppressive drugs that may modulate wound healing, including postoperative inflammation. This study aimed to compare the effect of oral and 0.1% topical diclofenac sodium on short-term inflammation and α-smooth muscle actin (α-SMA) expression at the tendon-scleral attachment site following strabismus surgery in an experimental rabbit model.

METHODS

Superior rectus recession was performed in 12 eyes of six New Zealand rabbits. Rabbits were divided into three groups: oral diclofenac 2 × 5 mg/kg for three days (group A), 0.1% diclofenac sodium eye drops 3 times/day for three days (group B), and controls (group C). On postoperative day 14, enucleation was performed. Macroscopic adhesion score, microscopic adhesion score, percentage of postoperative inflammation area (Masson's trichrome staining), and α-SMA (immunohistochemistry staining) were assessed. Data analysis was performed using a semi-quantitative and quantitative assessment with ImageJ. All groups were compared with reciprocal staining intensity (RSI) values to measure α-SMA expression.

RESULTS

All groups showed no difference in macroscopic (p = 0.13) and microscopic adhesion scores (p = 0.28). The percentage of postoperative inflammation area in group B (12.44% (8.63-18.29)) was significantly lower than group A (26.76% (21.38-37.56) p = 0.03) and group C (27.80% (16.42-36.28), p = 0.04). Comparative RSI analysis found that group B had a significantly lower α-SMA expression than group C (174.08 ± 21.78 vs 212.58 ± 12.06, p = 0.04).

CONCLUSION

The results suggest that compared to oral, the administration of topical diclofenac showed a more significant reduction of short-term postoperative inflammation and α-SMA expression at the tendon-scleral attachment site following strabismus surgery.

Comparison of the Effect of Bromfenac versus Betamethasone Ophthalmic Solutions in Patients with Diabetic Macular Edema

PURPOSE

To examine the effect of 0.1% bromfenac (BF) ophthalmic solution and 0.1% betamethasone (BM) ophthalmic solution on diabetic macular edema (DME).

METHODS

This was a prospective trial. Nineteen patients (mean age of 66.6 ± 10.1 years) with DME and mean retinal thickness within a diameter of 1 mm from the fovea (central subfield thickness: CST) of 250-500 µm were randomized and instilled with BF or BM. CST, best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), and intraocular pressure (IOP) were measured at 4, 8, and 12 weeks after administration.

RESULTS

CST at baseline (p = .128) and that at 4, 8, and 12 weeks of administration was not significantly different between the BF (10 patients) and BM groups (9 patients). In patients with glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c) <8.0%, CST, compared with baseline, was significantly decreased in the BF group (seven patients) at 8 (p = .025) and 12 weeks (p = .043) of administration. When compared with the baseline, no significant changes in BCVA were observed at any point in time in either group. Baseline IOP was comparable between the groups. In the BM group, the values of change in IOP from baseline significantly increased at 8 (p = .025) and 12 weeks (p = .044) of administration, with no significant changes in IOP over the 12 weeks of administration in the BF group.

CONCLUSIONS

BF did not affect IOP even after 12 weeks of administration, suggesting its effect in reducing CST in DME with good glycemic control.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

University Hospital Medical Information Network (UMIN-CTR); UMIN000026201, February 18, 2017; Japan Registry of Clinical Trials; jRCTs031180308, March 15, 2019.

Efficacy of Pretreatment with Preservative-Free Topical Bromfenac in Improving Post-Intravitreal-Injection Pain: A Prospective Pilot Study

(1) Background: To determine the analgesic effect of pretreatment topical bromfenac instillation in patients undergoing intravitreal anti-VEGF treatment. (2) Methods: A prospective, non-randomized pilot study was conducted in patients scheduled to receive repeated intravitreal anti-VEGF injections at a single tertiary hospital. Before the planned second injection, the patients received topical bromfenac eye drops twice a day for 3 days. At 1, 6, and 24 h after the first and second injections, the post-injection pain scores were determined using the numerical rating scale (NRS) telephonically. (3) Results: A total of 28 patients were enrolled in this study. After the first intravitreal injection, the NRS pain scores were 4.04 ± 1.90 at 1 h, 1.57 ± 1.75 at 6 h, and 0.93 ± 1.27 at 24 h. The pain scores after the second intravitreal injection significantly decreased at each measurement time point (p = 0.002, 0.055, and 0.004, respectively) compared to the first injection. (4) Conclusions: The use of topical bromfenac eye drops before intravitreal injection can lead to a significant improvement in injection-related pain scores, which is the basis for a future large-scale randomized comparative study.

Specialized Pro-Resolving Mediators Reduce Scarring After Cleft Lip Repair

Objective

Residual scarring after cleft lip repair surgery remains a challenge for both surgeons and patients and novel therapeutics are critically needed. The objective of this preclinical experimental study was to evaluate the impact of the methyl-ester of pro-resolving lipid mediator lipoxin A4 (LXA4-ME) on scarring in a novel rabbit model of cleft lip repair.

Methods

A defect of the lip was surgically created and repaired in eight six-week old New Zealand white rabbits to simulate human cleft lip scars. Rabbits were randomly assigned to topical application of PBS (control) or 1 ug of LXA4-ME (treatment). 42 days post surgery all animals were euthanized. Photographs of the cleft lip area defect and histologic specimens were evaluated. Multiple scar assessment scales were used to compare scarring.

Results

Animals treated with LXA4-ME exhibited lower Visual Scar Assessment scores compared to animals treated with PBS. Treatment with LXA4-ME resulted in a significant reduction of inflammatory cell infiltrate and density of collagen fibers. Control animals showed reduced 2D directional variance (orientation) of collagen fibers compared to animals treated with LXA4-ME demonstrating thicker and more parallel collagen fibers, consistent with scar tissue.

Conclusions

These data suggest that LXA4-ME limits scarring after cleft lip repair and improves wound healing outcomes in rabbits favoring the resolution of inflammation. Further studies are needed to explore the mechanisms that underlie the positive therapeutic impact of LXA4-ME on scarring to set the stage for future human clinical trials of LXA4-ME for scar prevention or treatment after cleft lip repair.

Treatment of Non-Infectious Corneal Injury: Review of Diagnostic Agents, Therapeutic Medications, and Future Targets

Corneal injuries can occur secondary to traumatic, chemical, inflammatory, metabolic, autoimmune, and iatrogenic causes. Ocular infection may frequently occur concurrent to corneal injury; however, antimicrobial agents are excluded from this present review. While practitioners may primarily rely on clinical examination techniques to assess these injuries, several pharmacological agents, such as fluorescein, lissamine green, and rose bengal, can be used to formulate a diagnosis and develop effective treatment strategies. Practitioners may choose from several analgesic medications to help with patient comfort without risking further injury or delaying ocular healing. Atropine, cyclopentolate, scopolamine, and homatropine are among the most frequently used medications for this purpose. Additional topical analgesic agents may be used judiciously to augment patient comfort to facilitate diagnosis. Steroidal anti-inflammatory agents are frequently used as part of the therapeutic regimen. A variety of commonly used agents, including prednisolone acetate, loteprednol, difluprednate, dexamethasone, fluorometholone, and methylprednisolone are discussed. While these medications are effective for controlling ocular inflammation, side effects, such as elevated intraocular pressure and cataract formation, must be monitored by clinicians. Non-steroidal medications, such as ketorolac, bromfenac, nepafenac, and diclofenac, are additionally used for their efficacy in controlling ocular inflammation without incurring side effects seen with steroids. However, these agents have their own respective side effects, warranting close monitoring by clinicians. Additionally, ophthalmologists routinely employ several agents in an off-label manner for supplementary control of inflammation and treatment of corneal injuries. Patients with corneal injuries not infrequently have significant ocular surface disease, either as a concurrent pathology or as an exacerbation of previously existing disease. Several agents used in the management of ocular surface disease have also been found to be useful as part of the therapeutic armamentarium for treatment of corneal injuries. For example, several antibiotics, such as doxycycline and macrolides, have been used for their anti-inflammatory effects on specific cytokines that are upregulated during acute injuries. There has been a recent wave of interest in amniotic membrane therapies (AMTs), including topical, cryopreserved and dehydrated variants. AMT is particularly effective in ocular injuries with violation of corneal surface integrity due to its ability to promote re-epithelialization of the corneal epithelium. Blood-based therapies, including autologous serum tears, plasma-enriched growth factor eyedrops and autologous blood drops, have additionally been explored in small case series for effectiveness in challenging and recalcitrant cases. Protection of the ocular surface is also a vital component in the treatment of corneal injuries. Temporary protective methods, such as bandage contact lenses and mechanical closure of the eyelids (tarsorrhaphy) can be particularly helpful in selective cases. Glue therapies, including biologic and non-biologic variants, can also be used in cases of severe injury and risk of corneal perforation. Finally, there are a variety of recently introduced and in-development agents that may be used as adjuvant therapies in challenging patient populations. Neurotrophic corneal disease may occur as a result of severe or chronic injury. In such cases, recombinant human nerve growth factor (cenegermin), topical insulin, and several other novel agents may be an alternate and effective option for clinicians to consider.

Bromfenac 0.09% for the Treatment of Macular Edema Secondary to Noninfectious Uveitis

PURPOSE

The topical nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug bromfenac 0.09% has a potential benefit in uveitic macular edema (UME) with a safe side effect profile. The aim of the study is to assess the efficacy of bromfenac sodium solution in the treatment of UME.

METHODS

The charts of 10 patients with macular edema due to noninfectious uveitis treated with bromfenac 0.09% were reviewed retrospectively. The main outcomes studied were the best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) and the central retinal thickness (CRT) compared 4 months before bromfenac initiation, at the time of its initiation, and 4 months later.

RESULTS

Twelve eyes of 10 patients were included. BCVA and CRT were unchanged 4 months befoew bromfenac compared to the time of bromfenac initiation (P = 1.0 and P = 0.2, respectively). There were a significant improvement in BCVA after 4 months of bromfenac treatment (P = 0.043) and a significant decrease in CRT (P = 0.002). Subretinal fluid resolved completely in 8/9 eyes, and 4/9 eyes had a complete resolution of cystoid macular edema at 4 months.

CONCLUSION

Bromfenac may be a useful addition to the treatment of UME.

Comparative evaluation of once-daily and twice-daily dosing of topical bromfenac 0.09%: aqueous pharmacokinetics and clinical efficacy study

PURPOSE

To evaluate aqueous pharmacokinetics of topical bromfenac 0.09% and compare clinical outcomes of once- and twice-daily dosing in phacoemulsification.

SETTING

Dr. R.P. Center for Ophthalmic Sciences, AIIMS, New Delhi, India.

DESIGN

Prospective interventional study.

METHODS

In phase I, single-drop aqueous pharmacokinetics of topical bromfenac was estimated at 15 minutes, 30 minutes, 1 hour, 2 hours, 4 hours, 12 hours, and 24 hours using liquid chromatography mass spectrometry in 60 eyes. In phase II, 45 eyes undergoing phacoemulsification were enrolled: group I (control, n = 15), group II (once-daily bromfenac, n = 14), and group III (twice-daily bromfenac, n = 16). Intraoperative pupillary miosis, postoperative anterior chamber (AC) flare, Summed Ocular Inflammation Score (SOIS), central macular thickness (CMT), and pain scores were assessed. Follow-up was performed at 1 day, 7 days, 28 days, and 90 days postoperatively.

RESULTS

Half-life of topical bromfenac was 3.6 hours, mean residence time 5.5 hours, and peak concentration (63.73 ng/mL) achieved after 2 hours. Aqueous concentration was more than inhibitory concentration (IC50) at 12 hours but not at 24 hours. Cumulative effect was observed with repeated dosing with aqueous levels more than IC50 in once-daily and twice-daily groups at 5 days. Significant intraoperative miosis was observed in group I. Pain score, AC flare, and SOIS were significantly more in group I (P < .001) and comparable in groups II and III at all timepoints. CMT was comparable in all groups; no case developed cystoid macular edema.

CONCLUSIONS

Single-dose topical bromfenac did not maintain therapeutic aqueous concentration over 24 hours; however, cumulative effect was observed with repeated dosing. Clinical efficacy of once-daily and twice-daily dosing was comparable.

Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs for retinal neurodegenerative diseases

Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) are among the most common prescription drugs for inflammation, and topical NSAIDs are often used in ophthalmology to reduce pain, photophobia, inflammation, and edema. In recent years, many published reports have found that NSAIDs play an important role in the treatment of retinal neurodegenerative diseases, such as age-related macular degeneration (AMD), diabetic retinopathy (DR), glaucoma, pathological myopia, and retinitis pigmentosa (RP). The aim of the current review is to provide an overview of the role of various NSAIDs in the treatment of retinal neurodegenerative diseases and the corresponding mechanisms of action. This review highlighted that the topical application of NSAIDs for the treatment of retinal degenerative diseases has been studied to a remarkable extent and that its beneficial effects in many diseases have been proven. In the future, prospective studies with large study populations are required to extend these effects to clinical settings.

Drug-Loaded Hydrogels for Intraocular Lenses with Prophylactic Action against Pseudophakic Cystoid Macular Edema

Pseudophakic cystoid macular edema (PCME), caused by chronic inflammation, is the most common cause of visual impairment in the medium-term after cataract surgery. Therefore, the prophylactic topical administration of combined steroidal and non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs is commonly done. Drug-eluting intraocular lenses (IOLs) gained interest as an efficient way to overcome the compliance issues related to the use of ocular drops without the need for additional surgical steps. The incorporation of functional monomers and molecular imprinting were herein applied to design hydrogels suitable as IOLs and able to co-deliver steroidal (dexamethasone sodium phosphate) and non-steroidal (bromfenac sodium) drugs. The incorporation of N-(2-aminopropyl) methacrylamide (APMA) increased the drug uptake and improved the in vitro release kinetics. Imprinting with bromfenac resulted in a decreased drug release due to permanent drug bonding, while imprinting with dexamethasone increased the amount of dexamethasone released after dual-drug loading. The application of a mathematical model to predict the in vivo drug release behavior suggests the feasibility of achieving therapeutic drug concentrations of bromfenac and dexamethasone in the aqueous humor for about 2 and 8 weeks, respectively, which is compatible with the current topical prophylaxis after cataract surgery.

Text Mining-Based Drug Discovery in Osteoarthritis

Background

Osteoarthritis (OA) is a chronic and degenerative joint disease, which causes stiffness, pain, and decreased function. At the early stage of OA, nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) are considered the first-line treatment. However, the efficacy and utility of available drug therapies are limited. We aim to use bioinformatics to identify potential genes and drugs associated with OA.

Methods

The genes related to OA and NSAIDs therapy were determined by text mining. Then, the common genes were performed for GO, KEGG pathway analysis, and protein-protein interaction (PPI) network analysis. Using the MCODE plugin-obtained hub genes, the expression levels of hub genes were verified using quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction (qRT-PCR). The confirmed genes were queried in the Drug Gene Interaction Database to determine potential genes and drugs.

Results

The qRT-PCR result showed that the expression level of 15 genes was significantly increased in OA samples. Finally, eight potential genes were targetable to a total of 53 drugs, twenty-one of which have been employed to treat OA and 32 drugs have not yet been used in OA.

Conclusions

The 15 genes (including PTGS2, NLRP3, MMP9, IL1RN, CCL2, TNF, IL10, CD40, IL6, NGF, TP53, RELA, BCL2L1, VEGFA, and NOTCH1) and 32 drugs, which have not been used in OA but approved by the FDA for other diseases, could be potential genes and drugs, respectively, to improve OA treatment. Additionally, those methods provided tremendous opportunities to facilitate drug repositioning efforts and study novel target pharmacology in the pharmaceutical industry.

Topical bromfenac reduces multiple inflammatory cytokines in the aqueous humour of pseudophakic patients

Intraocular surgery is associated with increased ocular inflammation. If maintained for a prolonged period after surgery, this inflammation can cause various complications, including subconjunctival fibrosis and bleb scarring. This clinical trial was a prospective, randomised, single-blind, interventional study comparing the efficacy and safety of 0.1% bromfenac sodium ophthalmic solution and 0.02% fluorometholone ophthalmic suspension in the inhibition of multiple inflammatory cytokines in the aqueous humour of 26 patients with pseudophakic eyes who had undergone phacoemulsification and intraocular lens implantation. The patients were randomly assigned to one of the trial drugs, and aqueous humour samples were collected before and after drug administration. Platelet-derived growth factor-AA levels significantly decreased in both drug groups, but they were significantly higher in the fluorometholone group than in the bromfenac group (P = 0.034). Bromfenac also significantly decreased vascular endothelial growth factor level (P = 0.0077), as well as monocyte chemoattractant protein-1 level (P = 0.013), which was elevated for a prolonged period after phacoemulsification. These data suggest that bromfenac is useful to alleviate prolonged microenvironmental alterations in the aqueous humour of pseudophakic eyes.

Effect of 0.1% Bromfenac for Preventing Macular Edema after Cataract Surgery in Patients with Diabetes

Purpose

To investigate the effect of 0.1% bromfenac sodium hydrate ophthalmic solution for prevention of macular edema after cataract surgery in patients with diabetes.

Methods

A retrospective analysis of 75 patients with diabetes who underwent cataract surgery was performed. Thirty-eight patients (52 eyes) were instilled with 0.1% bromfenac solution (bromfenac group) and 37 patients (46 eyes) were not (control group).

Results

There were no significant preoperative between-group differences. Compared to the control group, at 1 month after surgery, the bromfenac group showed slightly better best-corrected visual acuity (0.12 ± 0.12 vs. 0.32 ± 0.42, p = 0.142), lower central macular thickness (265.58 ± 31.28 vs. 314.15 ± 76.11 µm, p < 0.001), and lower macular volume (8.46 ± 0.60 vs. 9.14 ± 1.53 mm³, p = 0.022). There were no significant differences between the two groups at 4 and 6 months postoperatively (p > 0.05). Mean changes in central macular thickness showed significant differences at 1 and 4 months postoperatively (−1.44 ± 11.72 and 10.44 ± 22.48 µm in bromfenac group vs. 47.19 ± 70.24 and 31.69 ± 48.04 µm in control group, p < 0.001 and p = 0.016) and mean changes in macular volume showed a significant difference at 1 month postoperatively (−0.08 ± 0.47 mm³ in bromfenac group vs. 0.58 ± 1.28 mm³ in control group, p < 0.001). There were no significant differences thereafter (p > 0.05).

Conclusions

Treatment with 0.1% bromfenac sodium hydrate ophthalmic solution showed good efficacy for preventing cystoid macular edema early after cataract surgery in patients with diabetes.

VITREOUS PROSTAGLANDIN E2 CHANGES AFTER TOPICAL ADMINISTRATION OF DICLOFENAC 0.1%, INDOMETHACIN 0.5%, NEPAFENAC 0.3%, AND BROMFENAC 0.09

PURPOSE

To evaluate the vitreous concentration of different nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) after topical administration and the related prostaglandin E2 (PGE2) levels in patients undergoing pars plana vitrectomy.

METHODS

A prospective, randomized, investigator-masked study was performed. One hundred four patients scheduled for a pars plana vitrectomy for an epiretinal membrane or a macular hole were randomized to receive topical diclofenac 0.1%, indomethacin 0.5%, nepafenac 0.3%, bromfenac 0.09%, or placebo 3 days before surgery. At the beginning of surgery, a sample of undiluted vitreous was collected in each patient to assess NSAIDs concentration and PGE2 levels.

RESULTS

The median vitreous concentrations were 203.35 (interquartile range 146.54-264.18) pg/mL for diclofenac, 243.45 (interquartile range 156.96-365.37) pg/mL for nepafenac, 438.21 pg/mL (interquartile range, 282.52-645.87) for its active metabolite amfenac, 350.14 (interquartile range, 290.88-481.95) pg/mL for indomethacin, and 274.59 (245.43-358.25) pg/mL for bromfenac. Vitreous PGE2 levels were significantly lower for all the NSAIDs groups compared with the control group (P < 0.001). A statistically significant higher vitreous PGE2 level was found in the diclofenac group compared with the other NSAIDs groups (P < 0.05).

CONCLUSION

Topical NSAIDs achieve sufficient vitreous concentration to decrease vitreous PGE2 levels compared with the control group. The different efficacy in reducing PGE2 concentration may affect the management of posterior segment inflammation.

Use of topical bromfenac for treating ocular pain and inflammation beyond cataract surgery: a review of published studies

Topical ophthalmic nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) are commonly used to treat postoperative inflammation and pain following cataract surgery and for treatment and prophylaxis of pseudophakic cystoid macular edema (CME). Bromfenac is a brominated NSAID with strong in vitro anti-inflammatory potency. Like other ophthalmic NSAIDs, bromfenac is often used outside of the cataract surgery setting. This paper provides an overview of bromfenac’s preclinical ocular pharmacology and pharmacokinetics, followed by a review of 23 published clinical studies in which various marketed bromfenac formulations were used for conditions other than cataract surgery or pseudophakic CME. These include: post-refractive eye surgery; macular edema associated with diabetes, uveitis, or retinal vein occlusion; inflammation associated with age-related macular degeneration; pain related to intravitreal injections; and other ocular anterior segment and surface disorders with an inflammatory component. The published evidence reviewed supports the safety and effectiveness of bromfenac in these additional ophthalmic indications. Bromfenac was well tolerated when given alone or in combination with intravitreal anti-vascular endothelial growth factor agents, topical corticosteroids, or topical mast-cell stabilizers. The most common adverse event reported was ocular irritation. No serious adverse events (ie, corneal epithelial disorders) were reported, although the majority of studies did not systematically evaluate potential side effects. Corneal complications, such as melts reported with diclofenac and ketorolac, were not observed with bromfenac in the studies. In summary, published study data support the clinical utility of bromfenac in various ocular disorders beyond post-cataract surgery. Additional studies are warranted to further define the potential role of bromfenac ophthalmic solution in clinical practice.

An ex vivo human aqueous humor-concentration comparison of two commercial bromfenac formulations

Purpose

The purpose of this study was to quantify the concentration of bromfenac in the aqueous humor utilizing high-performance liquid chromatography mass spectrometry between two commercial nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, using aqueous humor concentrations to characterize pharmacokinetic proportional differences between 0.075% bromfenac ophthalmic solution in DuraSite (BromSite^®) and 0.09% bromfenac ophthalmic solution (Bromday^®).

Methods

In this multicenter, randomized, double-masked, two-arm, parallel-group, comparative, Phase II clinical trial, subjects were assigned to receive bromfenac in DuraSite or bromfenac ophthalmic solution in a 1:1 ratio. One drop of the masked test article was instilled into the study eye once a day for 2 days prior to and 3 hours prior (last instillation) to the subject's cataract surgery. Aqueous humor samples were collected upon initial cataract incision for analysis of bromfenac levels. The primary end point was aqueous humor concentration of bromfenac at Day 3, at the initiation of cataract surgery. Aqueous humor samples were collected and analyzed for bromfenac levels.

Results

A total of 60 subjects completed the study, 30 in each group. The mean bromfenac aqueous humor concentration in subjects who received bromfenac in DuraSite was more than twice (49.33±41.87 ng/mL, P=0.004) that of subjects who received bromfenac ophthalmic solution (23.65±16.31 ng/mL) after three doses.

Conclusion

Mean bromfenac aqueous humor concentration in subjects receiving the DuraSite-containing bromfenac in DuraSite (0.075%) was significantly higher compared to subjects receiving bromfenac ophthalmic solution (0.09%) after 3 days of dosing.

In Vivo Pharmacokinetics of Bromfenac Ophthalmic Solution 0.075%, Bromfenac Ophthalmic Solution 0.07%, and Nepafenac/Amfenac Ophthalmic Suspension 0.3% in Rabbits

Introduction

Little is known of the ocular distribution characteristics of currently branded non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) in the United States. This study was designed to predict the ocular bioavailability characteristics in humans using Dutch Belted rabbits as a surrogate. Commercially available, topically-applied NSAIDs containing bromfenac or nepafenac/amfenac were evaluated.

Methods

126 healthy adult Dutch Belted rabbits were randomly assigned to three treatment cohorts (BromSite^® twice daily [BID] in the right eye, BromSite^® once daily [QD] in the right eye, Prolensa^® QD in the right eye and Ilevro™ QD in the left eye) and 7 post-dosing time points (0.5, 1, 2, 4, 8, 12, 24 h after final instillation). The study eyes received 40 µL of the assigned drug for a consecutive 9 days. Samples of aqueous humor, iris-ciliary body, choroid, sclera, and retina were harvested from the study eyes at the assigned time point after the last dose on the 9th day. NSAID content in ocular tissues was analyzed using high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC), and area under the curve (AUC_0.5–24h), maximum concentration (C_max), and time to maximum concentration (T_max) were determined.

Results

Peak NSAID concentrations were reached within 1–3 h in the anterior segment and within 1–3 h in the posterior segment after last dose. Throughout the ocular tissues, both AUC and C_max for BromSite^® (BID and QD) were consistently higher than respective NSAID concentrations of Prolensa^® QD and Ilevro^® QD. When comparing BromSite^® BID to QD, the BID regimen produced generally higher but statistically similar bromfenac concentrations throughout the ocular tissues except in the aqueous humor and iris-ciliary body, where the AUC BID was statistically significantly higher with BromSite^® BID.

Conclusion

As a surrogate to human ocular bioavailability, BromSite^® demonstrated significantly greater NSAID compared to Prolensa^® QD and Ilevro^® QD. The DuraSite^® component of BromSite^® appears to enhance ocular penetration throughout both anterior and posterior tissues.

Funding

Sun Pharmaceutical Industries Ltd.

Topical bromfenac for prevention and treatment of cystoid macular edema following cataract surgery: a review

Topical nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) and corticosteroids, alone or in combination, have historically been used off label in the US to prevent and treat postoperative cystoid macular edema (CME). This literature review presents available data on the use of bromfenac 0.07% or 0.09% to prevent and treat CME following cataract surgery. Bromfenac is an NSAID approved to treat postoperative inflammation and reduce ocular pain following cataract surgery. Few cases of clinical CME were observed with bromfenac use in a total of 19 reviewed studies. There were no significant differences in CME incidence between bromfenac and corticosteroid-treated patients or between bromfenac- and bromfenac plus corticosteroid-treated patients. Bromfenac demonstrated comparable efficacy to other NSAIDs in preventing CME. Compared with corticosteroids, bromfenac alone or plus a corticosteroid showed similar or better efficacy in minimizing changes in retinal thickness and macular volume. In diabetic cataract surgery patients, bromfenac was comparable or superior to corticosteroids for minimizing changes in retinal thickness; also, combination therapy with bromfenac and corticosteroids may be associated with smaller changes in foveal thickness, macular thickness, and macular volume versus monotherapy with either treatment alone in this patient population. In two randomized, double-masked, placebo-controlled clinical trials with bromfenac 0.07%, CME was reported as an adverse event in 0.5% and 1.5% of patients receiving bromfenac and placebo, respectively. In an analysis of four placebo-controlled trials with bromfenac 0.09%, macular edema was reported in 0.7% and 1.4% of patients receiving bromfenac and placebo, respectively. When evaluated as treatment for acute or chronic CME, bromfenac was associated with improvement in visual acuity and reduction in retinal thickness, but few studies are available. Overall, published data suggest that bromfenac is safe and effective when used to prevent or treat CME. Large-scale placebo-controlled trials and greater standardization of CME measures are needed to establish optimal bromfenac regimens for the prophylaxis and treatment of CME following cataract surgery.

Bromfenac Ophthalmic Solution 0.07%: A Review of Its Use After Cataract Surgery

The nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug bromfenac has recently been reformulated with a lower pH to facilitate a reduction in the concentration of bromfenac (to 0.07%) while ensuring an ocular bioavailability similar to that of the 0.09% formulation. Bromfenac ophthalmic solution 0.07% (hereafter referred to as bromfenac 0.07%) [Prolensa(®)] is a once-daily topical ophthalmic solution available in the USA and Canada for the treatment of postoperative inflammation and the reduction of ocular pain in patients who have undergone cataract surgery. In an integrated analysis of two multicentre, phase III studies, bromfenac 0.07% was significantly more effective than placebo in reducing ocular inflammation and pain. In these studies, bromfenac 0.07% was well tolerated, with significantly lower incidences of adverse events, and adverse events affecting the study eye than with placebo. The most common adverse events in the study eye (eye pain, anterior chamber inflammation, foreign body sensation, photophobia, conjunctival hyperaemia and corneal oedema) occurred in numerically fewer bromfenac 0.07% than placebo recipients. Thus, current evidence suggests once-daily bromfenac 0.07% extends the treatment options currently available for the management of postoperative inflammation and pain following cataract surgery.

Efficacy and vitreous levels of topical NSAIDs

INTRODUCTION

Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) are one of the most commonly prescribed medications and are routinely used for their analgesic, antipyretic, and anti-inflammatory properties. Because of their potent cyclooxygenase-inhibitory activity, they can inhibit pro-inflammatory prostaglandin synthesis, leading to complex inflammatory cascades. NSAIDs have been broadly used systemically for many decades and have recently become commercially available in the form of topical ophthalmic formulations. NSAIDs are weak acids with pKa values mostly between 3.5 and 4.5 and are poorly water-soluble. New, aqueous ophthalmic solutions of NSAIDs that afford better tissue penetration have recently been developed. In ophthalmological practice, topical NSAIDs are mostly used to stabilize pupillary dilation during intraocular surgery, manage postoperative pain and inflammation, and treat pseudophakic cystoid macular edema.

AREAS COVERED

This review focuses on the vitreous penetration of topical NSAIDs and their potential clinical applications in the treatment of retinal diseases.

EXPERT OPINION

A growing body of evidence suggests that NSAIDs may be beneficial in the treatment of age-related macular degeneration, diabetic retinopathy, and ocular tumors. Recent studies from our group and other authors have shown that the vitreous levels of NSAID exceed the median inhibitory concentration, which can significantly decrease vitreous PGE2 levels.