The morphometry of soft tissue insertions on the tibial plateau: data acquisition and statistical shape analysis

Morphometric Analysis of the Tibial Attachment Shape of the Anterior Cruciate Ligament and Its Relationship With the Location of the Anterior Horn of the Lateral Meniscus

BACKGROUND

The success of anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction relies on the accurate replication of the native ACL anatomy, including attachment shapes. The tibial attachment of the ACL exhibits significant shape variations with elliptical, C, and triangular shapes, highlighting the need for objective classification methods and additional information to identify individual anatomic variations.

HYPOTHESIS

The location of the attachment of the anterior horn of the lateral meniscus (AHLM) may determine the shape of the ACL attachment.

STUDY DESIGN

Cross-sectional study; Level of evidence, 3.

METHODS

The study used 25 knees from 17 Japanese cadavers for macroscopic anatomic examination and quantitative analysis. The shape of the ACL attachment was quantified using principal component analysis with elliptical Fourier descriptors, whereas the AHLM location was quantified by measuring its mediolateral and anteroposterior positions on the superior surface of the tibia. Reliability was assessed statistically.

RESULTS

The shape of the tibial attachment of the ACL varied among individuals and was classified as elliptical, C-shaped, or triangular. Scatterplots of the principal components of the ACL attachment shape showed overlapping regions of elliptical, C-shaped, and triangular ACL attachments, indicating that a C-shaped attachment is intermediate between elliptical and triangular attachments. The location of the AHLM attachment also varied, with areas in the anterolateral, anteromedial, or posteromedial region. The ACL shape and AHLM location were related, with elliptical, C-shaped, and triangular ACL attachments corresponding to anterolateral, anteromedial, and posteromedial AHLM attachments, respectively.

CONCLUSION

The AHLM attachment location influences the shape of the ACL attachment. Information on the location of the AHLM attachment can aid in predicting the shape of the ACL attachment during ACL reconstruction, potentially improving footprint coverage.

Estimation of footprints of the canine stifle ligaments using deformable shape templates of bones

Knowledge regarding the ligament footprints in the canine stifle is essential for biomechanical modeling of the joint and patient-specific surgical planning for anatomical ligament reconstruction. The present study aimed to establish and evaluate deformable shape templates (DSTs) of the femur and tibia with footprints of the cruciate and collateral ligaments embedded for the noninvasive estimation of ligament footprint positions. To this end, a data set of computed tomography (CT)-derived surface models of the femur and tibia were established and used to build statistical shape models (SSMs). The contours of the stifle ligaments were obtained from CT scans of 27 hindlimb specimens with radio-opaque markings on the ligament footprints. The DST, constructed by embedding averaged footprint contours into the SSM, was used to estimate subject-specific ligament footprints in a leave-one-out cross-validation framework. The DST predictions were compared with those derived from radio-opaque-marked footprints. The results showed that the averaged Euclidean distances between the estimated and reference footprint centroids were less than 1.2 mm for the cruciate ligaments and 2.0 mm for the collateral ligaments. The DST appeared to provide a feasible alternative approach for noninvasively estimating the footprints of the stifle ligaments in vivo.

Systematic Review of Cadaveric Studies on Anterior Cruciate Ligament Anatomy Focusing on the Mid-substance Insertion and Fan-like Extension Fibers

PURPOSE

The purpose of this systematic review was to review the anatomical reports concerning the anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) focusing on the mid-substance insertion and fan-like extension fibers, or direct and indirect insertions.

METHODS

Following the PRISMA, data collection was performed. PubMed, Web of Science, and the Cochran library were searched with the terms "anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction", "anatomy", and "cadaver". Studies were included when anatomical dissection of the ACL with cadavers was performed. Biomechanical studies without a detailed description of the anatomical dissection, reviews, and studies not including pictures of the anatomical specimens were excluded from this study. In the full article review, documentation of the mid-substance insertion and fan-like extension fibers, or direct and indirect insertions in the ACL morphology was evaluated in detail.

RESULTS

Fifty-seven studies were included for detailed evaluation. In 2006, Mochizuki et al. reported a macroscopic differentiation between the mid-substance insertion and fan-like extension fibers in the ACL footprint. In 2010, Iwahashi et al. detected the existence of direct and indirect insertions within the femoral ACL footprint, microscopically. Following Mochizuki's report, anatomical evaluation of the mid-substance insertion and fan-like extension fibers, or direct and indirect insertions was reported in 16 of 51 ACL anatomical studies. In studies focusing on the morphology of the ACL, 16 of 28 studies addressed this subject. In these studies, the mid-substance insertion and fan-like extension fibers were differentiated macroscopically, and the direct and indirect insertions were differentiated microscopically within the ACL footprint. Fan-like extension fibers or indirect insertion was reported to surround the mid-substance insertion or direct insertion within the femoral ACL footprint.

CONCLUSIONS

The results of this systematic review showed that, the existence of the mid-substance insertion and fan-like extension fibers, or direct and indirect insertions in ACL morphology is being recognized more widely. These structures should be taken into consideration when surgeons perform ACL surgery.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

III. Systematic review of Level-III studies.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s43465-022-00695-4.

Significance of the broad non-bony attachments of the anterior cruciate ligament on the tibial side

Knowledge of the anatomy of the anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) is important to understand the function and pathology of the knee joint. However, on the tibial side of ACL, its structural relationships with the articular cartilage and lateral meniscus remain unclear. Furthermore, conventional research methods are limited to analyzing the bone attachments. We provide a comprehensive, three-dimensional anatomical description of the tibial side of the ACL that questions the principle that “a ligament is necessarily a structure connecting a bone to another bone.” In our study, 11 knees from 6 cadavers were used for macroscopic anatomical examinations, serial-section histological analyses, and three-dimensional reconstructions. The attachments of the tibial side of ACL consisted of attachments to the bone (102.6 ± 27.5 mm²), articular cartilage (40.9 ± 13.6 mm²), and lateral meniscus (6.5 ± 4.6 mm²), suggesting that the ACL has close structural relationships with the articular cartilage and lateral meniscus. Our study demonstrates that the tibial side of the ACL is not attached to the bone surface only and provides new perspectives on ligamentous attachments. Considering its attachment to the articular cartilage would enable more accurate functional evaluations of the mechanical tensioning of the ACL.

The accuracy of a newly developed guide system in medial meniscus posterior root repair: a comparison between two aiming guides

Purpose

Posterior root repair of the medial meniscus (MM) can prevent rapid progression of knee osteoarthritis in patients with a MM posterior root tear (MMPRT). The anatomic reattachment of the MM posterior root is considered to be critical in a transtibial pullout repair. However, tibial tunnel creation at the anatomic attachment is technically difficult. We hypothesized that a newly developed point-contact aiming guide [Unicorn Meniscal Root (UMR) guide] can create the tibial tunnel at a better position rather than a previously designed MMPRT guide. The aim of this study was to compare the position of the created tibial tunnel between the two meniscal root repair guides.

Materials and methods

Thirty-eight patients underwent transtibial pullout repairs. Tibial tunnel creation was performed using the UMR guide (19 cases) or MMPRT guide (19 cases). Three-dimensional computed tomography images of the tibial surface were evaluated using the Tsukada’s measurement method postoperatively. The expected anatomic center of the MM posterior root attachment was defined as the center of three tangential lines referring to three anatomic bony landmarks (anterior border of the posterior cruciate ligament, lateral margin of the medial tibial plateau, and retro-eminence ridge). The expected anatomic center and tibial tunnel center were evaluated using the percentage-based posterolateral location on the tibial surface. The distance between the anatomic center and tunnel center was calculated.

Results

The anatomic center of the MM posterior root footprint was located at a position of 79.2% posterior and 39.5% lateral. The mean of the tunnel center in the UMR guide was similar to that in the MMPRT guide (posterior direction, P = 0.096; lateral direction, P = 0.280). The mean distances between the tunnel center and the anatomic center were 4.06 and 3.99 mm in the UMR and MMPRT guide group, respectively (P = 0.455).

Conclusions

The UMR guide, as well as the MMPRT guide, is a useful device to create favorable tibial tunnels at the MM posterior root attachment for pullout repairs in patients with MMPRTs.

Level of evidence

IV

A new aiming guide can create the tibial tunnel at favorable position in transtibial pullout repair for the medial meniscus posterior root tear

INTRODUCTION

Injuries to the medial meniscus (MM) posterior root lead to accelerated cartilage degeneration of the knee. An anatomic placement of the MM posterior root attachment is considered to be critical in transtibial pullout repair of the medial meniscus posterior root tear (MMPRT). However, tibial tunnel creation at the anatomic attachment of the MM posterior root is technically difficult using a conventional aiming device. The aim of this study was to compare two aiming guides. We hypothesized that a newly-developed guide, specifically designed, creates the tibial tunnel at an adequate position rather than a conventional device.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Twenty-six patients underwent transtibial pullout repairs. Tibial tunnel creation was performed using the Multi-use guide (8 cases) or the PRT guide that had a narrow twisting/curving shape (18 cases). Three-dimensional computed tomography images of the tibial surface were evaluated using the Tsukada's measurement method postoperatively. Expected anatomic center of the MM posterior root attachment and tibial tunnel center were evaluated using the percentage-based posterolateral location on the tibial surface. Percentage distance between anatomic center and tunnel center was calculated.

RESULTS

Anatomic center of the MM posterior root footprint located at a position of 78.5% posterior and 39.4% lateral. Both tunnels were anteromedial but tibial tunnel center located at a more favorable position in the PRT group: percentage distance was significantly smaller in the PRT guide group (8.7%) than in the Multi-use guide group (13.1%).

DISCUSSION

The PRT guide may have great advantage to achieve a more anatomic location of the tibial tunnel in MMPRT pullout repair.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

III.