Attentional bias in snus users: an experimental study

Is smokeless tobacco a healthier option in patients with AUD? A follow-up study during treatment

INTRODUCTION

Smoking is negatively related to mental health, but there is a paucity of research on the relationship between the use of smokeless tobacco, such as snus, and mental health outcomes, especially in people with alcohol use disorders (AUD). The aim of the present study was to examine the development of mental distress and quality of life (QoL) among AUD patients in treatment who did or did not use snus.

METHOD

The study included 128 AUD patients (27% female) from three rehabilitation clinics in Eastern Norway who were interviewed at admission, at 6 weeks, and after 6 months. Patients were asked about their mental health-related problems, alcohol, and substance use, QoL, and physical activity. Information about tobacco use was gathered with the questions "Do you smoke cigarettes?" and "Do you use snus?", with follow-up questions "How often?".

RESULT

There were 39 current snus users (31%), of which 20 were also current smokers (dual users). Seventy-five patients (59%) were smokers only, and only 14 (11%) patients were abstainers. Those who used snus only had a lower severity of dependence score than the other groups (p < 0.05). The dual use group reported lower QoL than the no tobacco use group. In a regression model adjusted for sex and age, smokers and dual users, but not users of snus, had higher levels of mental distress and poorer QoL compared to nontobacco users (p < 0.05). There were no differences between tobacco groups at follow-ups.

CONCLUSION

In this study, among AUD patients, snus users reported QoL and mental distress close to that of non-smokers, indicating a lower problem load among snus users compared to smokers.

IMPLICATIONS

Previous studies have shown conflicting results regarding the potential harm reduction effect of snus use among patients with AUD who smoke regarding their tobacco use, quality of life and mental health problems. This study suggests that snus use could also be a viable alternative to smoking for patients with addictions.

A Preliminary Investigation on Smokeless Tobacco Use and Its Cognitive Effects Among Athletes

Introduction: Among athletes, an increasing use of nicotine via smokeless tobacco has been reported. However, there are currently unanswered questions about whether the use by athletes is due to nicotine’s addictive properties and/or to benefits in physical and cognitive performance (e.g., decision-making). In this original article we reported about, (i) snus-induced reinforcing effects among snus-user athletes (Survey) and (ii) the effects of snus on the Iowa Gambling Task (IGT) in snus-user skiers (Experimental study). IGT is an experimental neuropsychological task that has been previously used on athletes and addicts to test decision-making.

Methods: Survey: data were collected with the modified Cigarette Evaluation Questionnaire (mCEQ) that was administered to 61 winter sport athlete snus-users in Northern Italy. Experimental study: IGT data included: amount of money earned, number of choices from advantageous and disadvantageous decks and overall net score. Eighteen male snus-users were tested under satiety or after 12-h abstinence conditions according to a crossover design.

Results: Survey: the comparison between occasional vs. regular snus-users showed a statistically significant difference in satisfaction (P = 0.0088), calm (P = 0.0252), and enjoyment (P = 0.0001) mCEQ items suggesting a snus intake/effect relationship. Experimental study: significantly higher IGT net scores were found during the first 20 choice cards after abstinence vs. satiety conditions (P = 0.0024).

Conclusion: In the Survey, regular snus use induces greater satisfaction and psychological reward than occasional use. In the Experimental study, snus intake might produce an early and transient cognitive improvement on IGT in abstinent snus-users, presumably acting as a withdrawal relief.