Comparison of the efficacy of rosuvastatin versus atorvastatin in preventing contrast induced nephropathy in patient with chronic kidney disease undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention

Contrast-induced acute kidney injury: a review of definition, pathogenesis, risk factors, prevention and treatment

Contrast-induced acute kidney injury (CI-AKI) has become the third leading cause of hospital-acquired AKI, which seriously threatens the health of patients. To date, the precise pathogenesis of CI-AKI has remained not clear and may be related to the direct cytotoxicity, hypoxia and ischemia of medulla, and oxidative stress caused by iodine contrast medium, which have diverse physicochemical properties, including cytotoxicity, permeability and viscosity. The latest research shows that microRNAs (miRNAs) are also involved in apoptosis, pyroptosis, and autophagy which caused by iodine contrast medium (ICM), which may be implicated in the pathogenesis of CI-AKI. Unfortunately, effective therapy of CI-AKI is very limited at present. Therefore, effective prevention of CI-AKI is of great significance, and several preventive options, including hydration, antagonistic vasoconstriction, and antioxidant drugs, have been developed. Here, we review current knowledge about the features of iodine contrast medium, the definition, pathogenesis, molecular mechanism, risk factors, prevention and treatment of CI-AKI.

Preventive Effect of Pretreatment with Pitavastatin on Contrast-Induced Nephropathy in Patients with Renal Dysfunction Undergoing Coronary Procedure: PRINCIPLE-II Randomized Clinical Trial

This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy of pitavastatin pretreatment on contrast-induced nephropathy (CIN) in patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) after a coronary procedure. This was a prospective, randomized, double-blinded, placebo-controlled, multicenter clinical trial. All consecutive 70 patients with CKD (eGFR < 60 mL/min/1.73 m²) were enrolled and randomized into two groups. Group I consisted of patients who were treated with statins (pitavastatin 4 mg/day) for seven days before and three days after the procedure (n = 37, 52.9%), and group II consisted of patients who were treated with a placebo (n = 33, 47.1%). The primary endpoint was the incidence of CIN, and the secondary endpoints were the change in serum creatinine (∆sCr) level and estimated glomerular filtration rate (∆eGFR) after the procedure. The mean age of the patients (males, 74%) was 70.4 ± 9.0 years. After the coronary procedure, the incidence of CIN was lower in group I than in group II, but the difference was not significant (5.4% vs. 9.1%, p = 0.661). The maximal ∆sCr was lower and the maximal ∆eGFR was higher in group I than in group II, but the difference was not significant (-0.11 ± 0.53 mg/dL and -0.04 ± 0.33 mg/dL, p = 0.678; 4.3 ± 11.2 mL/min/1.73 m² and -2.9 ± 20.4 mL/min/1.73 m², p = 0.161, respectively). This study showed the possibility of a clinical benefit of pretreatment with a high dose of pitavastatin for the prevention of CIN in patients with CKD after coronary procedure (ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT01871792).

Comparison of the preventive efficacy of rosuvastatin versus atorvastatin in post-contrast acute kidney injury in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention

Statins have been shown to reduce the risk of post-contrast acute kidney injury (PC-AKI) in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). However, the preventive effect of rosuvastatin versus atorvastatin on PC-AKI in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) undergoing PCI remains unclear. Patients with STEMI undergoing PCI between January 2010 and May 2016 were consecutively enrolled. A total of 1300 included patients were divided into two groups according to the statin type (atorvastatin: n = 1040; rosuvastatin: n = 260). The primary endpoint was PC-AKI defined as an absolute increase of ≥ 0.5 mg/dL in the level of serum creatinine or an increase of ≥ 25 % over baseline within 48-72 h after contrast media exposure. In total, 245 (18.8 %) patients developed PC-AKI. The atorvastatin and rosuvastatin groups had similar rates of PC-AKI (19.1 % vs. 17.7 %, p = 0.595), in-hospital mortality (4.1 % vs. 3.8 %, p = 0.833), and major adverse clinical events (MACE). Multivariate logistic regression analysis revealed that rosuvastatin treatment had an effect similar to atorvastatin regarding PC-AKI (odds ratio [OR] = 0.97, 95 % confidence interval [CI], 0.66-1.43, p = 0.874). Propensity score analyses and subgroup analysis demonstrated similar results for PC-AKI. Kaplan-Meier survival curves and Cox proportional regression showed that the atorvastatin and rosuvastatin groups had no differences regarding follow-up mortality. Rosuvastatin exerted a similar preventive effect against PC-AKI and showed similar levels of in-hospital and follow-up all-cause mortality and in-hospital MACE compared with atorvastatin in patients with STEMI undergoing PCI.

Pharmacologic Prophylaxis of Contrast-Induced Nephropathy

Different pharmacologic agents have been tested in the effort to prevent contrast-induced acute kidney injury (AKI) in the last two decades. To date, however, no individual drug has received unanimous approval for this aim. Since 2014 statins have been included as preventive treatment in the European guidelines for revascularization procedures in cardiac patients. The present update presents the latest findings in this field focusing on the changing paradigms in the definition and consequently the approach to nephroprotection that considers clinical prognosis as the major issue. We note the current shift from attention to contrast-induced AKI to contrast-associated AKI.

[The problem of safety of lipid-lowering therapy]

This study focused on analysis of current publications evaluating safety of lipid-lowering therapy. Search for literature was performed on websites of cardiological societies and online databases, including PubMed, EMBASE, and eLibrary by the following key words: statins, statin intolerance, lipid-lowering therapy, statin safety, and statin аdverse effects. The focus is on statins, in view of the fact that they are the most commonly prescribed, highly effective and safe drugs for primary and secondary cardiovascular prophylaxis. This review consistently summarized information about myopathies, hepatic and renal dysfunction, potentiation of DM, and other possible adverse effects of lipid-lowering therapy. The author concluded that despite the high safety of statins acknowledged by all international cardiological societies, practicing doctors still continue unreasonably cancel statins, exposing the patient under even greater danger. Information about the corresponding author.

Comparative Efficacy of Statins for Prevention of Contrast-Induced Acute Kidney Injury in Patients With Chronic Kidney Disease: A Network Meta-Analysis

Contrast-induced acute kidney injury (CI-AKI) is a common complication of iodinated contrast medium administration during cardiac catheterization. Statin treatment has been shown to be associated with reduced risk of CI-AKI; however, the results are inconsistent, especially for patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD). Thus, we conducted a network meta-analysis to evaluate the effects of statins in the prevention of CI-AKI. We systematically searched several databases (including, Embase, PubMed, the Cochrane Library, and ClinicalTrials.gov ) from inception to January 31, 2018. The primary outcome was occurrence of CI-AKI in patients with CKD undergoing cardiac catheterization. Both pairwise and network meta-analysis were performed. Finally, 21 randomized controlled trials with a total of 6385 patients were included. Results showed that statin loading before contrast administration was associated with a significantly reduced risk of CI-AKI in patients with CKD undergoing cardiac catheterization (odds ratio: 0.46; P < .05). Atorvastatin and rosuvastatin administered at high dose may be the most effective treatments to reduce incidence of CI-AKI, with no difference between these 2 agents.

The renoprotective effects of simvastatin and atorvastatin in patients with acute coronary syndrome undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention: An observational study

Some statins, such as atorvastatin, have proven renoprotective effects. The comparative renoprotective potential of simvastatin is less clear. This study aimed to compare the renoprotective effects of simvastatin with atorvastatin in patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS) undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). This observational study examined the medical records of 271 patients who were treated at the Guangdong Cardiovascular Institute from April 2004 to February 2008. Patients had received either 40 mg simvastatin (n = 128) or 20 mg atorvastatin (n = 143), daily, for a period of at least 6 months following PCI. Declined renal function (DRF) was defined at the occurrence of chronic kidney disease (CKD) or elevated CKD stages at 6-months post-PCI. Results showed that the incidence of DRF was similar among patients taking simvastatin or atorvastatin (25.00% vs 26.57%, respectively). Kaplan-Meier survival analysis showed that patients who developed DRF had a higher incidence of mortality and major adverse cardiovascular events (MACEs) than those without DRF (17.41% vs 28.57%, P = .0308). Multivariate logistic regression analysis identified diabetes and baseline estimated glomerular filtration rate as independent risk factors for DRF. Collectively, our results indicate that simvastatin has comparable renoprotective effects to atorvastatin in ACS patients undergoing PCI. Further studies are warranted to confirm the comparative renoprotective effects of statins.

Efficacy of short-term moderate or high-dose rosuvastatin in preventing contrast-induced nephropathy: A meta-analysis of 15 randomized controlled trials

BACKGROUND

The prophylactic efficacy of statin pretreatment for the prevention of contrast-induced nephropathy (CIN) in patients undergoing coronary angiography (CAG) or percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) remains controversial. The aim of the study was to perform a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) to assess the effectiveness of short-term moderate or high-dose rosuvastatin pretreatment in preventing CIN.

METHODS

We included RCTs comparing short-term moderate or high-dose rosuvastatin treatment versus low-dose rosuvastatin treatment or placebo for preventing CIN. The primary endpoint was the incidence of CIN within 2 to 5 days after contrast administration, and related-parameters including serum creatinine (SCr), cystatin C (CysC), hypersensitive C-reactive protein (hs-CRP), urine microalbumin (mALB) were also extracted.

RESULTS

Fifteen RCTs with a total of 2673 patients were identified and analyzed. Patients who received moderate or high-dose rosuvastatin pretreatment had a 55% lower risk of CIN compared with low-dose rosuvastatin pretreatment or placebo group based on a fixed effect model (RR = 0.45, 95% CI 0.35-0.58, P < .0001). The benefit of moderate or high-dose rosuvastatin was consistent in both comparisons with low-dose rosuvastatin (RR = 0.40, 95% CI 0.27-0.59, P < .0001) or placebo (RR = 0.45, 95% CI 0.35-0.58, P < .0001). And moderate (20 mg) or high dose (≥40 mg) rosuvastatin significantly reduced the incidence of CIN compared with the control (RR = 0.39, 95% CI 0.29-0.54, P < .0001, RR = 0.56, 95% CI 0.37-0.85, P = .006, respectively). Subgroup analysis showed that moderate or high-dose rosuvastatin pretreatment could decrease the incidence of CIN in patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) (RR = 0.53, 95% CI 0.30-0.93, P = .03) or diabetes mellitus (DM) (RR = 0.51, 95% CI 0.31-0.86, P = .01) or acute coronary syndrome (ACS) patients undergoing PCI (RR = 0.52, 95% CI 0.35-0.76, P = .0009) or in studies which received mean contrast volume ≥110 mL (RR = 0.43, 95% CI 0.32-0.58, P < .0001). The SCr, CysC, hs-CRP, and mALB after the operation in the moderate or high-dose rosuvastatin group were lower than those of low-dose rosuvastatin group.

CONCLUSION

This meta-analysis demonstrated that moderate or high-dose rosuvastatin treatment could reduce the incidence of CIN in patients undergoing CAG or PCI. Moreover, moderate or high-dose rosuvastatin would be beneficial in high-risk patients with CKD or DM or undergoing PCI.

Hydrophilic vs lipophilic statins in coronary artery disease: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

INTRODUCTION

Some available experimental studies have reported that hydrophilic statins might have advantages compared with lipophilic statins in patients with coronary artery disease (CAD). Therefore, we performed a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) investigating the potential differences of lipophilic and hydrophilic statins in patients with CAD.

METHODS

We systematically searched selected electronic databases up to September 2016 to select RCTs, which compared clinical outcomes of hydrophilic vs lipophilic statins. Primary endpoints were cardiovascular (CV) events: major adverse cardiac events, myocardial infarction, cardiac revascularization, stroke, CV death, CV hospitalization, and all-cause mortality. Secondary endpoints were safety parameters: drug discontinuation, statin-associated muscle symptoms and alanine aminotransferase level increase.

RESULTS

A total of 11,697 patients from 11 RCTs, randomly allocated to lipophilic (n = 5736) or hydrophilic statins (n = 5961), with a mean follow-up 14 months, were included in the meta-analysis. In comparison with hydrophilic, the lipophilic statins showed similar risk reduction for major adverse cardiac events (relative risk = 0.969, 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.835-1.125, P = .682), myocardial infarction (0.880, 95% CI: 0.731-1.058, P = .174), CV death (0.757, 95% CI: 0.486-1.180, P = .219), and all-cause mortality (0.797, 95% CI: 0.590-1.075, P = .137), as well as cardiac revascularization, stroke, drug discontinuation, and statin-associated muscle symptoms. CV hospitalization was lower (0.789, 95% CI: 0.643-0.969, P = .024) and alanine aminotransferase elevation was higher (2.689, 95% CI: 1.841-3.954, P ≤ .001) in lipophilic than in hydrophilic-treated patients.

CONCLUSIONS

In conclusion, similarity between hydrophilic and lipophilic statins holds between various clinical CAD settings.

Effect of high-dose rosuvastatin loading before percutaneous coronary intervention in Chinese patients with acute coronary syndrome: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Background

Acute coronary syndrome (ACS) is an important disease threatening human life and health. Many studies have shown that the loading dose of atorvastatin can significantly improve the prognosis of patients with ACS, and reduce the mortality. However, this conclusion is not consistent. Thus, we aimed to evaluate the effect of high-dose rosuvastatin loading before percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in Chinese patients with ACS using a meta-analysis based on a systematic review of published articles.

Methods

We systematically reviewed published studies, evaluating the effect of high-dose rosuvastatin loading before percutaneous coronary intervention in Chinese patients with ACS. The retrieval time is limited from inception to 2 November 2016, and the retrieved databases included PubMed, Embase, the Cochrane Library, Web of Science, CBM, CNKI, the VIP database and the Wang Fang database. Two researchers independently assessed the quality of the included studies and then extracted the data. Stata 11.0 was used for data analysis.

Results

In total, 11 articles, which included 802 patients, were included in our meta-analysis. Among these patients, 398 patients were in the high-dose group (20 mg/day) and 404 patients were in the conventional dose group (10 mg/day). Meta-analysis results showed that compared with the conventional dose group: 1) The loading dose of rosuvastatin can significantly reduce the hs-CRP level after PCI, including at 24 hours (SMD = -0.65, 95%CI -0.84 ~ -0.47, P = 0.000), 48 hours (SMD = -0.40, 95%CI -0.68 ~ -0.11, P = 0.006), and four weeks (SMD = -1.64, 95%CI -2.01 ~ -1.26, P = 0.000). 2) The loading dose of rosuvastatin can significantly reduce the levels of LDL-C and cTnT, including the level of LDL-C at 30 d after PCI (SMD = -0.89, 95%CI -1.10 ~ -0.69, P = 0.000), and the level of cTnT at 24 h after PCI (SMD = -1.93, 95%CI -2.28 ~ -1.59, P = 0.000), and increase the level of HDL-C at 48 h after PCI (SMD = 0.61, 95%CI 0.34 ~ 0.88, P = 0.000). 3) The loading dose of rosuvastatin can significantly reduce the levels of TG and TC, including the level of TG at 30 d after PCI (SMD = -0.94, 95%CI -1.17 ~ -0.71, P = 0.000), the level of TC at 48 h after PCI (SMD = -0.35, 95%CI -0.68 ~ -0.01, P = 0.043), and the level of TC at 30 d after PCI (SMD = -0.77, 95%CI -0.98 ~ -0.56, P = 0.000).

Conclusions

Our systematic review and meta-analysis showed that, compared with the conventional dose, the loading dose of rosuvastatin was more beneficial to patients with ACS in China and is suitable for clinical application. Due to the limitations of the quality and quantity of included articles, this conclusion still needs to be confirmed by multicenter clinical trials.

Comparison of Effects of Different Statins on Contrast-Induced Acute Kidney Injury in Rats: Histopathological and Biochemical Findings

Statins are a promising new strategy to prevent contrast-induced acute kidney injury (CI-AKI). In this study we compared the ameliorative effect of different statins in a rat model of CI-AKI. Sprague-Dawley rats were divided into five groups: control group; CI-AKI group; CI-AKI + rosuvastatin group (10 mg/kg/day); CI-AKI + simvastatin group (80 mg/kg/day); and CI-AKI + atorvastatin group (20 mg/kg/day). CI-AKI was induced by dehydration for 72 hours, followed by furosemide intramuscular injection 20 minutes before low-osmolar contrast media (CM) intravenous injection. Statins were administered by oral gavage once daily for 3 consecutive days before CM injection and once 4 hours after CM injection. Rats were sacrificed 24 hours after CM injection, and renal function, kidney histopathology, nitric oxide (NO) metabolites, and markers of oxidative stress, inflammation, and apoptosis were evaluated. The results showed that atorvastatin and rosuvastatin but not simvastatin ameliorated CM-induced serum creatinine elevation and histopathological alterations. Atorvastatin and rosuvastatin showed similar effectiveness against CM-induced oxidative stress, but simvastatin was less effective. Atorvastatin was most effective against NO system dysfunction and cell apoptosis, whereas rosuvastatin was most effective against inflammation. Our findings indicate that statins exhibit differential effects in preventing CI-AKI when given at equivalent lipid-lowering doses.

Efficacy comparison of atorvastatin versus rosuvastatin on blood lipid and microinflammatory state in maintenance hemodialysis patients

Introduction: To investigate the effect of Atorvastatin (ATO) and Rosuvastatin (ROS) on blood lipid, high sensitivity CRP (hs-CRP), interleukin-6 (IL-6), albumin (ALB), prealbumin (PA), and transferring (TF) in maintenance hemodialysis (MHD) patients.

Methods: Eighty MHD patients were enrolled and divided into two groups: ROS and ATO. Patients in Group ROS (n = 38) received ROS (10 mg/day), and those in group ATO (n = 42) received ATO (20 mg/day) for 12 weeks, respectively.

Findings: Administration of ROS and ATO both significantly reduced the concentrations of TC, LDL-C, TG, hs-CRP, and IL-6, but increased high-density lipoproteincholesterol (HDL-C), ALB, PA, and TF levels. Furthermore, the level of LDL-C decreased more significantly with inhibited microinflammation and improved nutrition situation in ROS group compared with ATO group. ATO and ROS not only decreased blood lipid levels but also inhibited the microinflammatory state and improved nutrition situation in MHD patients.

Discussion: The results have shown that ROS is better than ATO in the treatment of MHD patients.

Rosuvastatin Treatment for Preventing Contrast-Induced Acute Kidney Injury After Cardiac Catheterization: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials

We performed a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) to evaluate the protective effects of rosuvastatin on contrast-induced acute kidney injury (CI-AKI) and major adverse cardiovascular events (MACEs) in patients undergoing cardiac catherization.PubMed, MEDLINE, Web of Science, EMBASE, ClinicalTrials.gov, and the Cochrane Central RCTs were searched for RCTs from inception to May 2015, to compare rosuvastatin for preventing CI-AKI with placebo treatment in patients undergoing cardiac catherization.Five RCTs with a total of 4045 patients involving 2020 patients pretreated with rosuvastatin and 2025 control patients were identified and analyzed. Patients treated with rosuvastatin had a 51% lower risk of CI-AKI compared with the control group based on a fixed-effect model (OR = 0.49, 95% CI = 0.37-0.66, P < 0.001), and showed a trend toward a reduced risk of MACEs (OR = 0.62, 95% CI = 0.36-1.07, P = 0.08). A subgroup analysis showed that studies with Jadad score ≥3 showed a significant reduction of CI-AKI (OR = 0.53, 95% CI, 0.38-0.73, P < 0.001). However, the risk of CI-AKI did not significantly differ in the studies with Jadad score <3 (OR = 0.54, 95% CI, 0.13-2.24, P = 0.40). In addition, the rosuvastatin treatment showed no effect for preventing CI-AKI in patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) undergoing elective cardiac catherization (I = 0%, OR = 0.81, 95% CI = 0.41-1.61, P = 0.55).This updated meta-analysis demonstrated that preprocedural rosuvastatin treatment could significantly reduce the incidence of CI-AKI, with a trend toward a reduced risk of MACEs in patients undergoing cardiac catheterization. However, rosuvastatin treatment did not seem to be effective for preventing CI-AKI in CKD patients undergoing elective cardiac catheterization.

Statins in the prevention of contrast-induced nephropathy

OPINION STATEMENT

Coronary angiography and percutaneous coronary interventions are common procedures that utilize iodinated contrast medium to visualize the coronary arterial tree and treat stable and unstable ischemic heart syndromes. Exposure to contrast agents can cause acute and persistent worsening of renal function leading to increased morbidity and mortality. Certain patient characteristics such as age, presence of diabetes, congestive heart failure, chronic kidney disease, hemodynamic instability on presentation, and type and volume of contrast used can increase the risk of developing contrast-induced nephropathy (CIN) and its subsequent complications. Despite the lack of a universal definition, CIN is typically defined as an increase in serum creatinine ≥0.5 mg/dL or 25 % above baseline 48 to 72 h after contrast exposure. Previous research has shown the benefits of adequate intravenous hydration with iso-osmolar crystalloids and the importance of limiting the amount of low-osmolar and iso-osmolar contrast used to prevent the development of CIN. 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl coenzyme A reductase inhibitors (statins) have anti-inflammatory and anti-apoptotic properties with few side effects, making it an attractive therapeutic option for prevention of CIN. A number of trials have examined the benefit of different types of statins, high-dose versus low-dose statins, loading versus chronic dosing of statins, in various clinical presentations including acute coronary syndromes and elective procedures, and in those with associated comorbidities such as anemia and chronic kidney disease. In this review, we will summarize recent data regarding statin therapy for prevention of contrast-induced nephropathy.