Incidence and risk of proteinuria with aflibercept in cancer patients: a meta-analysis

Risk of antiangiogenic adverse events in metastatic colorectal cancer patients receiving aflibercept in combination with chemotherapy: A meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Aflibercept has been approved for the treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer for more than a decade, but its antiangiogenesis adverse effect profile during treatment remains unclear. This study is conducted to systematically review the risk of antiangiogenic adverse events in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer receiving aflibercept plus chemotherapy.

METHODS

We searched databases, including PubMed, Embase and the Cochrane Library up to September 9, 2021. Relevant randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and single-arm studies were included in the review. Statistical analyses were performed using R to calculate the summary incidence rate of antiangiogenic-related adverse events, odds ratios and 95% CIs. Heterogeneity among the included studies was assessed by subgroup analysis. Publication bias analysis and sensitivity analysis were performed to confirm the reliability of the results.

RESULTS

A total of 2889 patients from 10 studies met the inclusion criteria. The quality of the included studies was evaluated as qualified for further quantitative synthesis. In part of single-arm studies, the occurrence rates were 44.2% (95%CI, 39.7-48.7%) for hypertension, 31.3% (95% CI, 19.3-43.3%) for proteinuria, 27.3% (95%CI, 21.2-33.4%) for epistaxis, 22.5% (95%CI, 7.8-37.3%) for hemorrhage events, 8.0% (95%CI, 2.0-14 .0%) for venous thromboembolic event in all grades and 22.6% (95%CI, 19.1-26.2%) for grade III/IV hypertension, 7.4% (95%CI, 6.2-8.5%) for grade III/IV proteinuria. In part of RCT, compared to its counterpart, aflibercept containing arm was associated with the increased incidence rate in hypertension (OR:6.30, 95%CI: 3.49-11.36), proteinuria (OR:4.12, 95%CI: 1.25-13.61), epistaxis (OR:3.71, 95%CI: 2.84-4.85), III/IV hypertension (OR:7.20, 95%CI: 5.23-9.92), III/IV proteinuria (OR:5.13, 95%CI: 3.13-8.41). The funnel plot, Begg test and Egger test were carried out on the primary endpoints, III/IV hypertension rate and III/IV proteinuria rate, the result of which detected no obvious publication bias. No significant difference was observed in subgroup analysis in the primary endpoint between the subgroups stratified by treatment line (firstline or non-firstline), chemotherapy regime (FOLFIRI or others) and study design (RCTs or single-arm trials).

CONCLUSION

The available evidence suggests that using aflibercept is associated with an increased risk of antiangiogenic adverse events compared with controls. Further studies are needed to investigate this association. In the appropriate clinical scenario, the use of aflibercept in its approved indications remains justified. However, the results of this study should be interpreted with caution, as some of the evidence comes from single-arm clinical trials.

A systemic review and meta-analysis of Aflibercept plus FOLFIRI regimen as a second-line treatment for metastatic colorectal cancer: A PRISMA compliant pooled analysis of randomized controlled trials and single arm studies to assess efficacy and safety

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

Aflibercept; a decoy receptor for vascular endothelial growth factors (VEGFs) and placental growth factor (PLGF), in combination with FOLFIRI (leucovorin calcium, fluorouracil, irinotecan hydrochloride) chemotherapy regime, was FDA approved in 2012 as second-line salvage chemotherapy for metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). This is the first systematic review, and meta-analysis-based evidence to determine the efficacy and safety of Aflibercept plus FOLFIRI regimen pooling randomized controlled trials and single-arm studies.

METHOD

PubMed, Cochrane library, Embase, and Clinical trial.gov were systematically searched for published randomized controlled trials, single-arm studies, and national patient programs on aflibercept plus FOLFIRI chemotherapy for the treatment of mCRC till 11/10/2022.

RESULT

Ten studies met the inclusion criteria comprising 1075 patients for efficacy studies and 2027 patients for safety studies. The pooled prevalences were 18% (95% CI, 5%-37%, p = 0.00) for 12m PFS and 61% (95% CI, 53% - 68%, p = 0.00) for 12m OS. The pooled prevalences were 69% (95% CI, 55% - 82%, p = 0.00) for any grade 3-4 toxicities, 10% (95% CI, 5% - 16%, p = 0.00) for grade 3-4 diarrhea, 13% (95% CI, 5% - 24%, p = 0.00) for grade 3-4 hypertension, 31% (95% CI, 22% - 40%, p = 0.00) for grade 3-4 neutropenia and 5% (95% CI, 2% - 7%, p = 0.00) for grade 3-4 venous thromboembolic event.

CONCLUSION

Our meta-analysis shows that the aflibercept plus FOLFIRI combination shows better survival efficacies however; it is also associated with more high-grade adverse events.

Efficacy, safety, and cost-effectiveness analysis of aflibercept in metastatic colorectal cancer: A rapid health technology assessment

Background: Metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) imposes a heavy tumor burden worldwide due to limited availability of therapeutic drugs. Aflibercept, a kind of recombinant protein of the anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) family, has been approved in clinical application among mCRC patients since 2012. A comprehensive analysis of the efficacy, safety, and cost-effectiveness of aflibercept in mCRC treatment is necessary.

Objective: To evaluate the efficacy, safety, and cost-effectiveness of aflibercept for the treatment of mCRC in order to provide a decision-making reference for the selection of targeted drugs for second-line treatment of mCRC in Hong Kong, Macao, and Taiwan regions of China and the selection of new drugs for medical institutions in these regions.

Methods: A systematic retrieve on databases including PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI), Wanfang, and Weipu, as well as relevant websites and databases of health technology assessment including the National Institute of Health and Clinical Optimization, Centre for Evaluation and Communication at the University of York, and the Canadian Agency for Medicines and Health Technology, was conducted. The literature was screened according to the inclusion and exclusion criteria, and data were extracted and analyzed by two authors, while the quality of the literature was assessed.

Results: Finally, we included two HTA reports, 11 systematic reviews/meta-analyses, and two cost-effectiveness studies in the rapid health technology assessment. For mCRC patients receiving second-line treatment, aflibercept combined with FOLFIRI significantly increased progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) and the objective response rate (ORR) also improved, compared with folinic acid + fluorouracil + irinotecan (FOLFIRI). In terms of safety, mCRC patients who received aflibercept combined with FOLFIRI therapy had a higher incidence of grade 3–4 adverse events than those who received FOLFIRI alone, including anti-VEGF–related adverse events (hypertension, hemorrhagic events, and proteinuria) and chemotherapy-related adverse events (diarrhea, weakness, stomatitis, hand-foot syndrome, neutropenia, and thrombocytopenia). In terms of cost-effectiveness, two economic studies conducted in the United Kingdom and Japan, respectively, found that compared with FOLFIRI, aflibercept combined with FOLFIRI had no cost-effectiveness advantage in mCRC patients receiving second-line treatment.

Conclusion: Compared with FOLFIRI treatment, aflibercept combined with FOLFIRI for the second-line treatment of mCRC patients has better efficacy, worse safety, and is not cost-effective. More high-quality clinical studies are required for further exploration of aflibercept’s clinical value. Medical institutions in Hong Kong, Macao, and Taiwan regions of China should be cautious when using or introducing aflibercept plus FOLFIRI as a mCRC treatment.

Efficacy and safety of aflibercept plus chemotherapy in metastatic colorectal cancer: A systematic review and PRISMA-Compliant single-arm Meta-Analysis of noncomparative clinical studies and randomized controlled trials

WHAT IS KNOWN AND OBJECTIVE

Aflibercept, a recombinant protein designed to suppress the vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) signalling pathway, has been used in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). We conducted the first meta-analysis to systematically review the efficacy and safety of aflibercept in mCRC.

METHODS

PubMed Central/Medline, Embase and cochrane library were systematically searched for randomized controlled trials and single-arm clinical trials on aflibercept plus chemotherapy for the treatment of mCRC through 9 September 2021.

RESULTS

Ten studies comprising 2049 patients met the inclusion criteria. The pooled estimate rates were 16.0% for 12mPFS, 64.4% for 12mOS, 32.5% for ORR, 83.5% for DCR, while the rates of III/IV AEs rate were 80.2% respectively. The pooled estimate rates were 16.8% for III/IV diarrhoea, 22.3% for III/IV hypertension, 29.5% for III/IV neutropenia, 7.3% for III/IV proteinuria and 8.6% for III/IV oral mucositis.

CONCLUSIONS

Analysis of data from randomized controlled trials(RCT) and single-arm clinical trials confirmed the good efficacy of aflibercept plus chemotherapy in mCRC, while the safety of the treatment is concerning.

Immune checkpoint inhibitors further aggravate proteinuria in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma after long-term targeted therapy

BACKGROUND

Increasing number of patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) are receiving subsequent programmed cell death protein-1 (PD-1) inhibitor combination therapy following tyrosine-kinase inhibitor (TKI) resistance. To explore whether PD-1 inhibitor would further deteriorate proteinuria and renal function, we observed their proteinuria's and renal function's condition since the administration of PD-1 inhibitor.

METHODS

To assess the change in proteinuria and renal function, the data of 141 patients with mRCC treated with TKI were collected, 66 of whom were further prescribed PD-1 inhibitor. Proteinuria and estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) were measured and analyzed. Logistic regression models were established to identify the predictors of proteinuria deterioration and significant eGFR decline (≥15%).

RESULTS

Of the 141 patients, 74 (52%) had an increase in proteinuria level after an average of 22.98 months of TKI treatment. In multivariate analysis, longer duration of TKI (>12 months) and administration of PD-1 inhibitor were independent predictors for proteinuria deterioration. The median eGFR decreased from 81.56 mL/min/1.73 m² to 66.75 mL/min/1.73 m² after TKI treatment. Logistic regression identified older age (>60 years old) and longer duration of TKI (>12 months) as independent predictors for significant eGFR decline. Finally, of the 66 patients who received subsequent PD-1 inhibitor, 34 had sufficient proteinuria and eGFR data at follow-up. The level of proteinuria increased further after the administration of PD-1 inhibitor, although the decrease in eGFR was not statistically significant (P=0.182). Log-rank analysis identified proteinuria deterioration and eGFR decline were both significantly associated with patent's survival (P<0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Targeted therapy was associated with an increase in proteinuria level and a decrease in eGFR in patients with mRCC. The administration of PD-1 inhibitor contributed to exacerbation in proteinuria, but no significant difference in a decrease of eGFR was observed.

Nephrotoxicity From Molecularly Targeted Chemotherapeutic Agents

The introduction of novel molecularly targeted therapies in the last 2 decades has significantly improved the patient survival compared to standard conventional chemotherapies. However, this improvement has been accompanied by a whole new spectrum of kidney adverse events. Although known as "targeted," many of these agents lack specificity and selectivity, and they have a tendency to inhibit multiple targets including those in the kidneys. Early detection and correct management of kidney toxicities is crucial to preserve kidney functions. The knowledge of these toxicities helps guide optimal and continued utilization of these potent therapies. The incidence, severity, and pattern of nephrotoxicity may vary depending on the respective target of the drug. Here, we review the mechanism of action, clinical findings of kidney adverse events, and their proposed management strategies.

Prognostic Role of the Platelet-to-Lymphocyte Ratio for Patients With Metastatic Colorectal Cancer Treated With Aflibercept

BACKGROUND/AIM

The efficacy of aflibercept plus 5-fluorouracil, leucovorin and irinotecan (FOLFIRI) therapy has been demonstrated in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) in global and Japanese clinical trials. However, a practical biomarker to predict its efficacy is lacking.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

This was a single-institution retrospective study of 21 patients with mCRC consecutively treated with aflibercept plus FOLFIRI from March 2018 to July 2019. We investigated the association and predictive value of pretreatment blood inflammation and immune-based scores, including the neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio, platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio (PLR), and lymphocyte-monocyte ratio, using their median values as cut-offs, in regard to disease control (DC), progression-free (PFS), and overall (OS) survival.

RESULTS

The number of patients in each treatment line of aflibercept was as follows: Second, 14 (66.7%); third, four (19.0%); fourth, two (9.5%); eighth, one (4.8%). The median number of aflibercept treatment courses was seven (range=2-17). The median follow-up time was 391 days. In univariate analysis, patients with DC had a significantly lower PLR than those without DC. Only the PLR was significantly negatively associated with PFS, but not with OS. Multivariate analysis showed a significantly poor prognostic impact of a high PLR on PFS (hazard ratio=10.28; p=0.003).

CONCLUSION

A low pretreatment PLR might be a predictor of aflibercept efficacy in patients with mCRC and may be clinically useful for selecting patient responders.

Predictive factors for the development of proteinuria in cancer patients treated with bevacizumab, ramucirumab, and aflibercept: a single-institution retrospective analysis

The development of proteinuria restricts the dose of anti-angiogenic agents, thereby reducing their efficacy. Thus, this retrospective study was undertaken to identify predictive factors of the development of angiogenesis inhibitor-induced proteinuria, and to elucidate if there is a difference in the likelihood of proteinuria among anti-angiogenic agents or cancer types, to help guide future strategies to improve the safety, efficacy, and quality of life of patients receiving chemotherapy. Between April 2014 and February 2019, 124 cancer patients at our outpatient chemotherapy center who were receiving chemotherapy with bevacizumab, ramucirumab, or aflibercept were enrolled. Variables related to the development of proteinuria were extracted from the patients' clinical records and used for regression analysis. The level of the proteinuria was evaluated based on CTCAE version 5. Multivariate ordered logistic regression analysis was performed to identify predictive factors for the development of proteinuria. The Wilcoxon/Kruskal-Wallis test was used to identify significant differences between groups. Significant factors identified included systolic blood pressure (SBP) [odds ratio (OR) = 1.031, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 1.005-1.058; P = 0.0197], number of cycles (OR = 1.049, 95% CI = 1.018-1.082; P = 0.0019), and calcium channel blocker use (OR = 2.589, 95% CI = 1.090-6.146; P = 0.0311). There was no difference among the three anti-angiogenic agents (P = 0.4969) or among cancer types (P = 0.2726) in the likelihood of proteinuria. In conclusion, SBP, number of cycles, and calcium channel blocker use were identified as significant predictors of the development of angiogenesis inhibitor-induced proteinuria. There was no difference among the three anti-angiogenic agents or among cancer types.

Ramucirumab: the long and winding road toward being an option for mCRC treatment

INTRODUCTION

Colorectal cancer (CRC) is one of the main causes of cancer-related morbidity and mortality worldwide. Mortality is most often attributable to metastatic disease. Despite the progress achieved so far, life expectancy continues to be limited in most patients. Ramucirumab, a most recent antiangiogenic drug, is vying in the race to metastatic CRC (mCRC) treatment since its approval by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA), based on the results of the RAISE study.

AREAS COVERED

This article reviews the role of ramucirumab in mCRC, including clinical indication, safety issues, and future perspectives.

EXPERT OPINION

The use of Ramucirumab in clinical practice is still limited, probably due to economic burden and the lack of specific biomarkers. Future efforts will be addressed to improve our knowledge in the use of this drug and better guide us in patients' care.

[Systemic safety following intravitreal injections of anti-VEGF]

The goal of this manuscript is to assess data suggesting that intravitreal injection of anti-vascular endothelial growth factors (anti-VEGFs) could result in systemic adverse events (AEs). The class-specific systemic AEs should be similar to those encountered in cancer trials. The most frequent AE observed in oncology, hypertension and proteinuria, should thus be the most common expected in ophthalmology, but their severity should be lower because of the much lower doses of anti-VEGFs administered intravitreally. Such AEs have not been frequently reported in ophthalmology trials. In addition, pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic data describing systemic diffusion of anti-VEGFs should be interpreted with caution because of significant inconsistencies reported. Thus, safety data reported in ophthalmology trials and pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic data provide robust evidence that systemic events after intravitreal injection are very unlikely. Additional studies are needed to explore this issue further, as much remains to be understood about local and systemic side effects of anti-VEGFs.

Kidney Toxicities Associated With Novel Cancer Therapies

Targeted therapies that act via unique molecular pathways and interfere with cancer cell growth and tumor progression have dramatically changed the cancer treatment paradigm. However, although, ideally, these therapies intend to target only cancer cells, they do often affect nonmalignant tissue. Numerous renal side effects have been reported to date. This article will review clinical presentation, presumed pathophysiology, and treatment of kidney side effects of targeted therapies. Feasibility of the continuation of cancer therapy despite renal toxicity will also be addressed.

Considering renal risk while managing cancer

Renal function is an important consideration in the management of patients with advanced cancer. There is a reciprocal relationship between cancer and the kidney: chronic kidney disease can increase the risk of developing cancer, and patients with cancer often experience renal impairment owing to age, disease-related factors and nephrotoxic treatments. As therapies for cancer continue to improve, patients are living longer with their disease, potentially extending the period over which they are susceptible to long-term complications. Furthermore, secondary symptoms, such as bone metastases or infections, may arise that will require treatment. Certain treatments, including chemotherapy, antibiotics and some bone-targeted agents, are nephrotoxic and may require dose modifications or interruptions to prevent renal injury. Nephrologists should play a key role in the identification and management of renal impairment in patients with cancer. Furthermore, they may be able to provide advice on protecting the kidneys in instances where nephrotoxic agents require dose reductions or interruptions, and when novel therapies or combinations are used. Collaboration between oncologists and nephrologists is important to optimal patient management. This article reviews the relationship between cancer and kidney disease and examines the treatments that may impact kidney function. Considerations for monitoring renal function are also discussed.

Incidence and risk of severe infections associated with aflibercept in cancer patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis

AIMS

Aflibercept is an engineered humanized vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF)-targeted agent. Severe infections are serious adverse event associated with aflibercept. However, the contribution of aflibercept to infection is still unknown. We thus conducted this meta-analysis to investigate the overall incidence and risk of developing severe infections in cancer patients treated with aflibercept.

METHODS

Electronic databases including PubMed, Embase and abstracts presented at American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) and European Society of Medical Oncology (ESMO) meeting were searched. Eligible studies were phase II and III prospective clinical trials of aflibercept in cancer patients with toxicity profile on infections. Summary incidences, relative risk (RR), odds ratio (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (95% CIs) were calculated by using either random effects or fixed effect models according to the heterogeneity of included studies.

RESULTS

A total of 4310 patients with a variety of solid tumours from 10 prospective clinical trials were included in the meta-analysis. The incidence of high grade infections associated with aflibercept was 7.3% (95% CI 4.3, 12.0%), with a mortality of 2.2% (95% CI 1.5, 3.1%). In addition, patients treated with aflibercept had a significantly increased risk of developing high grade (RR 1.87, 95% CI 1.52, 2.30; P < 0.001) and fatal (OR 2.16, 95% CI 1.14, 4.11; P = 0.018) infections. No evidence of publication bias was observed. Furthermore, the risk of infections with aflibercept was substantially higher than bevacizumab.

CONCLUSIONS

Aflibercept is associated with a significant increased risk of developing severe infections in patients with solid tumours. Frequent clinical monitoring and appropriate management for infections should be emphasized during aflibercept treatment.

Proteinuria in Patients with Solid Tumors Treated with Ramucirumab: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

BACKGROUND

We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis of the risk of proteinuria associated with ramucirumab.

METHODS

Eligible studies included randomized phase II and III trials of patients with solid tumors on ramucirumab, describing events of all-grade and high-grade proteinuria.

RESULTS

Our search strategy yielded 170 potentially relevant citations from PubMed/Medline, CENTRAL Cochrane database, ASCO and ESMO meeting libraries. After exclusion of ineligible studies, a total of 11 clinical trials were considered eligible for the meta-analysis. The relative risk (RR) of all-grade proteinuria was 3.31 (95% CI 2.48-4.42; p < 0.00001). Moreover, the RR of high-grade proteinuria was 5.28 (95% CI 2.32-12.01; p < 0.0001).

CONCLUSIONS

Our meta-analysis has demonstrated that ramucirumab use is associated with an increased risk of all-grade and high-grade proteinuria. Early detection strategies should be employed in those patients to prevent the progression to more sinister renal disease.

Therapeutic manipulation of angiogenesis with miR-27b

BACKGROUND

Multiple studies demonstrated pro-angiogenic effects of microRNA (miR)-27b. Its targets include Notch ligand Dll4, Sprouty (Spry)-2, PPARγ and Semaphorin (SEMA) 6A. miR-27 effects in the heart are context-dependent: although it is necessary for ventricular maturation, targeted overexpression in cardiomyocytes causes hypertrophy and dysfunction during development. Despite significant recent advances, therapeutic potential of miR-27b in cardiovascular disease and its effects in adult heart remain unexplored. Here, we assessed the therapeutic potential of miR-27b mimics and inhibitors in rodent models of ischemic disease and cancer.

METHODS

We have used a number of models to demonstrate the effects of miR-27b mimicry and inhibition in vivo, including subcutaneous Matrigel plug assay, mouse models of hind limb ischemia and myocardial infarction and subcutaneous Lewis Lung carcinoma.

RESULTS

Using mouse model of myocardial infarction due to the coronary artery ligation, we showed that miR-27b mimic had overall beneficial effects, including increased vascularization, decreased fibrosis and increased ejection fraction. In mouse model of critical limb ischemia, miR-27b mimic also improved tissue re-vascularization and perfusion. In both models, miR-27b mimic clearly decreased macrophage recruitment to the site of hypoxic injury. In contrast, miR-27b increased the recruitment of bone marrow derived cells to the neovasculature, as was shown using mice reconstituted with fluorescence-tagged bone marrow. These effects were due, at least in part, to the decreased expression of Dll4, PPARγ and IL10. In contrast, blocking miR-27b significantly decreased vascularization and reduced growth of subcutaneous tumors and decreased BMDCs recruitment to the tumor vasculature.

CONCLUSIONS

Our study demonstrates the utility of manipulating miR-27b levels in the treatment of cardiovascular disease and cancer.

Cardiac and vascular toxicities of angiogenesis inhibitors: The other side of the coin

Angiogenesis is one of the best-described tumor hallmarks. Targeting angiogenesis is becoming a successful strategy to suppress cancer growth. Vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF), the fulcrum of angiogenesis, contributes to vascular and cardiac homeostasis. Angiogenesis inhibitors classically associated with vascular side effects are increasingly recognized for cardiac adverse effects as reflected by several meta-analyses. A global approach to these findings is a pressing need, and future strategies involving collaboration among different medical specialties are highly encouraged.