Discrimination of complex human behavior by pigeons (Columba livia) and humans

Dynamically occluded action recognition by pigeons

Identifying the behaviors of organisms is essential for an animal's survival. This ability is particularly challenged when the "actors" are dynamically occluded by other objects and become fragmented as they move through an environment. Even when fragmented in time and across space, humans readily recognize the behavior of these dynamically occluded objects and actors. How animals process such fragmented information, especially when involving motion, remains uncertain. In three experiments, we investigated the ability of six pigeons to discriminate between the running and walking actions of digital animal models when dynamically occluded. The pigeons were tested in a go/no-go procedure using three models that transited behind multiple occluders in a semirealistic scene. Without ever seeing the entirety of the animal model at one time, all the pigeons learned to discriminate among these two behaviors. This discrimination transferred to an unfamiliar model, transit direction, transiting rates, camera perspectives, and occluders. Tests with different static and dynamic features indicated that the pigeons relied on motion features for the discrimination, especially articulated motion. These experiments demonstrate that pigeons, like humans, can discriminate actions even when their view of the actor is fragmented in time and space.

Pigeons process actor-action configurations more readily than bystander-action configurations

Behavior requires an actor. Two experiments using complex conditional action discriminations examined whether pigeons privilege information related to the digital actor who is engaged in behavior. In Experiment 1, each of two video displays contained a digital model, one an actor engaged in one of two behaviors (Indian dance or martial arts) and one a neutrally posed bystander. To correctly classify the display, the pigeons needed to conditionally process the action in conjunction with distinctive physical features of the actor or the bystander. Four actor-conditional pigeons learned to correctly discriminate the actions based on the identity of the actors, whereas four bystander-conditional birds failed to learn. Experiment 2 established that this failure was not due to the latter group's inability to spatially integrate information across the distance between the two models. Potentially, the colocalization of the relevant model identity and the action was critical due to a fundamental configural or integral representation of these properties. These findings contribute to our understanding of the evolution of action recognition, the recognition of social behavior, and forms of observational learning by animals.

The whole is equal to the sum of its parts: Pigeons (Columba livia) and crows (Corvus macrorhynchos) do not perceive emergent configurations

We previously demonstrated that chimpanzees, like humans, showed better accuracy and faster response time in discriminating visual patterns when the patterns were presented in redundant and uninformative contexts than when they were presented alone. In the present study, we examined the effect of redundant context on pattern discrimination in pigeons (Columba livia) and large-billed crows (Corvus macrorhynchos) using the same task and stimuli as those used in our previous study on chimpanzees. Birds were trained to search for an odd target among homogenous distractors. Each stimulus was presented in one of three ways: (1) alone, (2) with identical context that resulted in emergent configuration to chimpanzees (congruent context), or (3) with identical context that did not result in emergent configuration to chimpanzees (incongruent context). In contrast to the facilitative effect of congruent contexts we previously reported in chimpanzees, the same contexts disrupted target localization performance in both pigeons and crows. These results imply that birds, unlike chimpanzees, do not perceive emergent configurations.

Pigeons simultaneously attend to static and dynamic features of complex displays

The simultaneous processing and attention to temporally dynamic and static features remains an open and important question in theories of avian visual cognition. Here, four pigeons (Columba livia) learned to discriminate complex displays involving concurrently available static and dynamic features. These displays consisted of 20 elements built from combinations of two, binary-valued, static visual dimensions: red vs. green element color, large vs. small element size; and two binary-valued dynamic dimensions; fast vs slow element motion, right vs up motion direction. One combination of these four features was reinforced on a VI schedule. The remaining 15 combinations of element color, size, speed and direction were never reinforced. During acquisition, all four dimensions were simultaneously discriminated. Varying the number of elements revealed that a single element was sufficient to support discrimination of all four dimensions. The pigeons agreed on the relative discriminability of stimuli within and across the different dimensions, with the difference in motion direction being the hardest for all birds. Redundant facilitation suggested rapid, perhaps parallel, processing of both dynamic and static features. No attentional trade-offs between dynamic or static dimensions were observed. These results agree with theories of avian vision employing the notion of multiple independent channels for different types of information.

Complex conditional control by pigeons in a continuous virtual environment

We tested two pigeons in a continuously streaming digital environment. Using animation software that constantly presented a dynamic, three-dimensional (3D) environment, the animals were tested with a conditional object identification task. The correct object at a given time depended on the virtual context currently streaming in front of the pigeon. Pigeons were required to accurately peck correct target objects in the environment for food reward, while suppressing any pecks to intermixed distractor objects which delayed the next object's presentation. Experiment 1 established that the pigeons' discrimination of two objects could be controlled by the surface material of the digital terrain. Experiment 2 established that the pigeons' discrimination of four objects could be conjunctively controlled by both the surface material and topography of the streaming environment. These experiments indicate that pigeons can simultaneously process and use at least two context cues from a streaming environment to control their identification behavior of passing objects. These results add to the promise of testing interactive digital environments with animals to advance our understanding of cognition and behavior.

Experimental Divergences in the Visual Cognition of Birds and Mammals

The comparative analysis of visual cognition across classes of animals yields important information regarding underlying cognitive and neural mechanisms involved with this foundational aspect of behavior. Birds, and pigeons specifically, have been an important source and model for this comparison, especially in relation to mammals. During these investigations, an extensive number of experiments have found divergent results in how pigeons and humans process visual information. Four areas of these divergences are collected, reviewed, and analyzed. We examine the potential contribution and limitations of experimental, spatial, and attentional factors in the interpretation of these findings and their implications for mechanisms of visual cognition in birds and mammals. Recommendations are made to help advance these comparisons in service of understanding the general principles by which different classes and species generate representations of the visual world.