Weight-bearing and mobilization in the postoperative care of ankle fractures: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials and cohort studies

Isolated distal fibula fractures can be treated with locking screw plates with an immediate postoperative weight-bearing

BACKGROUND

Isolated distal fibula fractures (DFF) are usually treated with open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) and non-weight-bearing protocols. The study assessed the outcomes of immediate weight-bearing on DFF healing and stability after lateral locking plating.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

For this study, 49 patients affected by isolated DFF were enrolled. They underwent ORIF with a lateral polyaxial locking plate and were allowed immediate weight-bearing with crutches postoperatively. Clinical and radiographic evaluations were performed at 2, 6, and 12 weeks using the AOFAS (American Orthopedic Foot and Ankle Society) score and X-rays evaluations..

RESULTS

Immediate weight-bearing yielded positive outcomes, with a significant increase of the AOFAS score during the clinical re-evaluations. All patients tolerated early and progressive full weight-bearing without complications. Radiographic findings at 12 weeks showed complete bone healing in all cases.

CONCLUSIONS

The immediate weight-bearing protocol combined with lateral locking plating resulted in favorable clinical outcomes, accelerated recovery, and successful bone healing for stable DFF cases.

A Case Series on the Devastating Simultaneous Bilateral Fracture of Ankles That Remains Under-reported: Can We Address the Career-Ending Injuries?

Introduction

Bilateral simultaneous rotational ankle fractures are an unusual phenomenon that remains unreported in the English literature, and to our knowledge, about 10 cases have been reported. The aim of the study was to evaluate and report clinical outcomes of bilateral simultaneous ankle fractures in our institution.

Case Reoprt

We conducted a review of our 2-year experience with patients who had simultaneous bilateral fractures of the ankles and were treated at our institution. The included patients underwent surgical treatment using open reduction and internal fixation. Patients' functional outcomes were assessed using patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs), namely the Short Form-36 questionnaire and the Olerud and Molander Ankle Outcome Score (OMAS).

Results

Two cases (four ankles) of simultaneous bilateral rotational ankle fractures were identified in our institution's records. Both cases involved a pedestrian motor vehicle accident. They were both female and had an average age of 22.5 years. Due to an open injury, one ankle underwent a staging procedure, and the other three underwent open reduction and internal fixation with excellent clinical outcomes. Functional outcomes were measured with PROMs.

Conclusion

Simultaneous bilateral ankle fractures, while uncommon, can have a substantial impact on an individual's mobility and health-related quality of life. Early surgical intervention and effective rehabilitation enhance functional results in this devastating journey.

Effectiveness of behavior change in rehabilitation interventions to improve functional recovery after lower limb fracture: a systematic review

Ankle fractures are common injuries that can significantly impact mobility and quality of life. Rehabilitation following ankle fracture treatment is crucial for recovery, yet adherence to regimens remains a challenge. Behaviour Change Techniques (BCTs) have been suggested to improve adherence, but their effectiveness in ankle fracture rehabilitation is not well established. This review aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of BCTs in the rehabilitation of ankle fracture patients. We conducted a comprehensive search across multiple databases, including MEDLINE and EMBASE, focusing on Randomised Controlled Trials (RCTs) that incorporated BCTs into rehabilitation interventions. The effectiveness of BCTs on patient-reported outcomes (PROMs), quality of life, and adverse events was analysed. Nine RCTs met the inclusion criteria, encompassing a range of interventions that employed BCTs, most commonly including goal setting and instruction on how to perform behaviours, specifically physiotherapy exercises. The review found limited evidence supporting their effectiveness in improving PROMs. Only one study showed a significant positive effect, but it was deemed at high risk of bias. The lack of integration of behavioural theory in the design of rehabilitation interventions and the varied nature of the BCTs employed across studies may contribute to these findings. The use of BCTs in ankle fracture rehabilitation is prevalent, but this review highlights a significant gap their role of enhancing patient outcomes. Future research should incorporate a theory-based approach to intervention design, utilising a broader range of BCTs, to fully evaluate their potential in improving rehabilitation adherence and outcomes following ankle fracture .

Isolated Medial Malleolar Fractures: Current Concepts in Management

Isolated medial malleolar fractures (IMMFs) are uncommon and often occur with other ankle injuries, complicating their treatment and management. This review aims to compare the complication rates and functional outcomes of surgical versus conservative treatment for IMMFs in skeletally mature patients. The literature suggests that for IMMFs with less than 2 mm of displacement, conservative treatment provides functional outcomes similar to surgical interventions, with minimal complications. However, for fractures with greater displacement, surgical management is typically preferred due to its superior functional outcomes and low complication rates. Additionally, this review explores the biomechanics of various surgical constructs used to manage IMMFs. It provides insight into the most effective techniques for achieving stable fixation and promoting optimal recovery. By synthesizing evidence from the current literature, this review contributes to the ongoing debate regarding the management of IMMFs, emphasizing the importance of individualized treatment plans based on fracture characteristics and patient factors.

To cast or not to cast? Postoperative care of ankle fractures: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

Postoperative care of ankle fractures treated with open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) is a debated topic. A meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials was conducted with the aim of comparing early mobilization and weightbearing to traditional postoperative protocols. A systematic search of electronic databases was conducted according to the PRISMA guidelines. Only randomized clinical trials were included. Data about clinical outcome, time to return to work and complications were extracted and summarized. Meta-analyses were performed. Twenty studies for a total of 1328 patients were included. Early mobilization was compared to immobilization in 724 patients: the two groups did not significantly differ in terms of short- and long-term clinical outcome (p = 0.08 and p = 0.41, respectively). However, early mobilization resulted to be significantly associated with faster return to work (p = 0.047). Early weightbearing was compared to nonweightbearing in 1088 patients. While the clinical difference between the two groups was not significant at short term (p = 0.08), it was significant at long term (p = 0.002). No other significant differences, in particular regarding complications, were highlighted between different groups. Early motion, early weightbearing and traditional postoperative protocols are all safe strategies after ORIF for unstable ankle fractures. Early mobilization is significantly associated with faster return to work and early weightbearing improves long term clinical outcome.Level of evidence: I.

The Influence of Timing of Surgery on Postoperative Length of Hospital Stay in Closed Ankle Fractures

Background Ankle fractures are prevalent lower limb injuries that often necessitate surgical intervention to restore joint stability and functionality. Delays in surgical management can extend hospital stays and elevate the risk of complications. This study aims to evaluate the effect of surgical timing on the postoperative length of hospital stay in patients with closed ankle fractures managed through open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF). Objective The objective of this study was to determine whether early surgical intervention (within eight hours of injury) reduces the mean postoperative length of hospital stay compared to delayed surgery (after eight hours) in patients with closed ankle fractures undergoing open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF). Methods A retrospective cohort study was conducted over six months, from February 26, 2021, to August 26, 2021, involving 80 patients with closed ankle fractures treated at the Orthopaedic Surgery Department of Benazir Bhutto Hospital, Rawalpindi. Patients were categorized into two cohorts based on the time elapsed between injury and surgical intervention: early surgery (≤8 hours, n=43) and late surgery (>8 hours, n=37). The primary outcome measured was the length of hospital stay following ORIF. Data were analyzed using the Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (SPSS) version 23 (IBM Corp., Armonk, NY. US). Independent sample t-tests, chi-square tests, and analysis of variance (ANOVA) were employed to assess differences between cohorts, with a p-value of less than 0.05 considered statistically significant. Results The mean age of the patients was 43.90 ± 14.64 years, comprising 58 (72.5%) males and 22 (27.5%) females. The overall mean length of hospital stay was 2.67 ± 0.87 days. Patients who underwent late surgery had a significantly longer hospital stay (mean 3.04 ± 0.80 days, n=37) compared to those treated early (mean 2.36 ± 0.82 days, n=43), with a p-value of <0.001. The stratified analysis revealed similar trends across various subgroups, including age and gender. Conclusion This retrospective cohort study concludes that delayed surgical management of closed ankle fractures is associated with a longer hospital stay compared to early intervention. These findings advocate for prompt surgical treatment to enhance patient outcomes by reducing postoperative hospitalization durations.

Weight-bearing timing after the operative management of ankle fractures: Single center audit and critical appraisal of literature

The postoperative weight-bearing policy following internal fixation of unstable ankle fractures varies greatly and is largely surgeon-dependent. While early weight-bearing is favoured for its superior functional and economic outcomes, late weight-bearing may be safer initially. However, consensus on the preferred treatment protocol is lacking. We audited practices at University Hospitals Leuven, Belgium, comparing them to existing literature to establish an updated protocol. In a retrospective study of 236 patients with unstable ankle fractures, we compared outcomes between early (EWB) and late weight-bearing (LWB) strategies, with or without braces and/or vacuum casts. Most patients followed a LWB protocol, while EWB was reserved for younger, lower BMI individuals. The difference in brace or vacuum cast usage was insignificant. All open fractures followed a LWB protocol. No disparities in union rates, complications, or length of stay were found between EWB and LWB. Surgical management cost €6,419 (6,921 US $) on average, with length of stay being the main cost driver. Total healthcare costs did not differ significantly between EWB and LWB. FRI was revealed in 6 cases, (1 [4%] vs. 5 [2.5%], EWB vs. LWB respectively, P=0.922) In conclusion, while no significant differences in outcomes were observed between EWB and LWB rehabilitation, differences in group characteristics may have influenced these findings. Despite limited EWB cases, it appears safe for younger patients with low BMI. Vacuum casts and braces aid in EWB. Reducing length of stay, rather than restricting orthotic use, may help control healthcare costs.

Rehabilitation for ankle fractures in adults

BACKGROUND

Ankle fracture is one of the most common lower limb fractures. Whilst immobilisation of the ankle can support and protect the fracture site during early healing, this also increases the risk of ankle weakness, stiffness, and residual pain. Rehabilitation aims to address the after-effects of this injury, to improve ankle function and quality of life. Approaches are wide-ranging and include strategies to improve ankle joint movement, muscle strength, or both. This is an update of a Cochrane review last published in 2012.

OBJECTIVES

To assess the effects of rehabilitation interventions following surgical or non-surgical management of ankle fractures in adults.

SEARCH METHODS

We searched CENTRAL, MEDLINE, Embase, three other databases, and two clinical trials registers in May 2022, and conducted additional searches of CENTRAL, MEDLINE, and Embase in March 2023. We also searched reference lists of included studies and relevant systematic reviews.

SELECTION CRITERIA

We included randomised controlled trials (RCTs) and quasi-RCTs comparing any rehabilitation intervention delivered to adults with ankle fracture. Interventions could have been given during or after the initial fracture management period (typically the first six weeks after injury), which may or may not have included surgical fixation. We excluded participants with multi-trauma, pathological fracture, or with established complications secondary to ankle fracture.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

We used standard methodological procedures expected by Cochrane. We collected data for five outcomes: activity limitation (ankle function), health-related quality of life (HRQoL), participant satisfaction with treatment, pain, and adverse events (we focused on re-operation, defined as unplanned return to theatre). We report the findings up to six months after injury.

MAIN RESULTS

We included 53 studies (45 RCTs, 8 quasi-RCTs) with 4489 adults with ankle fracture. In most studies, orthopaedic management included surgical fixation but was non-surgical in five studies, and either surgical or non-surgical in six studies. Here, we summarise the findings for three common rehabilitation comparisons; these included the most data and were the most clinically relevant. Because of different intervention approaches, we sometimes included a study in more than one comparison. Data for other less common comparisons were also available but often included few participants and were imprecise. All studies were unavoidably at high risk of performance and detection bias. We downgraded the certainty of all evidence for this reason. We also downgraded for imprecision and when we noted inconsistencies between studies that precluded meta-analysis of data. Early (within 3 weeks of surgery) versus delayed weight-bearing (12 studies, 1403 participants) Early weight-bearing probably leads to better ankle function (mean difference (MD) 3.56, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.35 to 5.78; 5 studies, 890 participants; moderate-certainty evidence); however, this does not include a clinically meaningful difference. Early weight-bearing may offer little or no difference to HRQoL compared to delayed weight-bearing (standardised mean difference (SMD) 0.15, 95% CI -0.01 to 0.30; 5 studies, 739 participants; low-certainty evidence); when translated to the EQ-5D scale (a commonly-used HRQoL questionnaire), any small difference was not clinically important. We were unsure whether there were any differences in participant satisfaction or pain because these outcomes had very low-certainty evidence. For adverse events, there may be little or no difference in re-operation (risk ratio (RR) 0.50, 95% CI 0.09 to 2.68; 7 studies, 1007 participants; low-certainty evidence). Removable versus non-removable ankle support (25 studies, 2206 participants) Following surgery, using a removable ankle support may lead to better ankle function (MD 6.39, 95% CI 1.69 to 11.09; 6 studies, 677 participants; low-certainty evidence). This effect included both a clinically important and unimportant difference. There is probably an improvement in HRQoL with a removable ankle support, although this difference included both a clinically important and unimportant difference when translated to the EQ-5D scale (SMD 0.30, 95% CI 0.11 to 0.50; 3 studies, 477 participants; moderate-certainty evidence). No studies reported participant satisfaction. We were unsure of the effects on pain because of very low-certainty evidence (1 study, 29 participants). There may be little or no difference in re-operations (RR 1.20, 95% CI 0.39 to 3.71; 6 studies, 624 participants; low-certainty evidence). Following non-surgical management, there may be little or no difference between removable and non-removable ankle supports in ankle function (MD 1.08, 95% CI -3.18 to 5.34; 3 studies, 399 participants), and HRQoL (SMD -0.04, 95% CI -0.24 to 0.15; 3 studies, 397 participants); low-certainty evidence. No studies reported participant satisfaction. We were unsure of the effects on pain (2 studies, 167 participants), or re-operation because of very low-certainty evidence (1 study, 305 participants). Physical therapy interventions versus usual care or other physical therapy interventions (9 studies, 857 participants) Types of interventions included the use of active controlled motion, a spring-loaded ankle trainer, an antigravity treadmill, and variations of enhanced physiotherapy (e.g. additional stretching, joint mobilisation, neuromuscular exercises), delivered during or after the initial fracture management period. We were unable to pool data because of the differences in the design of interventions and their usual care comparators. Studies often included very few participants. The certainty of the evidence for all outcomes in this comparison was very low, and therefore we were unsure of the effectiveness of these therapies. No studies in this comparison reported re-operation.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

Early weight-bearing may improve outcomes in the first six months after surgery for ankle fracture, but the difference is likely to be small and may not always be clinically important. A removable ankle support may also provide a better outcome, but again, the difference may not always be clinically important. It is likely that neither approach increases the re-operation risk. We assume that the findings for these comparisons are applicable to people with closed ankle fractures, and that satisfactory fracture stabilisation had been achieved with surgery. For people who have non-surgical treatment, there is no evidence that either a removable or non-removable ankle support may be superior. We were uncertain whether any physical therapy interventions were more effective than usual care or other physical therapy interventions. We encourage investigators of future studies on rehabilitation interventions for ankle fracture to use a core outcome set.

Lag screw versus locking plate fixation for traumatic displaced medial malleolar fractures: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Lag screw fixation (LSF) or locking plate fixation (LPF) are both recommended for the treatment of medial malleolar fractures (MMFs). However, no standard has been established for attaining optimal surgical treatment or functional recovery. We hypothesized that LPF for MMFs would result in superior outcomes compared to LSF. To test this hypothesis, we conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of the clinical outcomes of LSF and LPF in the treatment of MMF.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We searched for studies published prior to November 2023 across the PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, and ClinicalTrials.gov databases. Standardization of individual effect sizes was conducted; subsequently, pooled effect sizes were derived by employing random-effects models.

RESULTS

Five retrospective studies involving 394 patients were reviewed. American Orthopedic Foot and Ankle Society (AOFAS) scores were significantly higher among patients who received LPF (mean difference [MD]: 2.21; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.37-4.04; p = 0.02) than among those who received LSF. Pain scores were significantly lower among patients who received LPF (MD: -0.35; 95% CI: -0.64 to -0.05; p = 0.02) than among those who received LSF. No significant differences in delayed union was observed between the groups (Relative risk [RR]: 1.43; 95% CI, 0.37-4.04; p = 0.42). Fixation failure was slightly higher in patients who received LSF than in those who received LPF (RR: 3.11; 95% CI, 0.88-11.01; p = 0.08).

DISCUSSION

Compared with LSF, LPF yields superior functional outcomes, superior patient comfort, and comparative complication rates. LPF is also better able to prevent rotation and apply compressive forces across fracture sites, which can facilitate the management of different types of MMF. Additional randomized controlled trials with larger sample sizes are warranted.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

III.

Early Motion and Directed Exercise (EMADE) following ankle fracture fixation: a pragmatic randomized controlled trial

Aims

This study aimed to compare the outcomes of two different postoperative management approaches following surgical fixation of ankle fractures: traditional cast immobilization versus the Early Motion and Directed Exercise (EMADE) programme.

Methods

A total of 157 patients aged 18 years or older who underwent successful open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) of Weber B (AO44B) ankle fractures were recruited to this randomized controlled trial. At two weeks post-surgical fixation, participants were randomized to either light-weight cast-immobilization or the EMADE programme, consisting of progressive home exercises and weekly advice and education. Both groups were restricted to non-weightbearing until six weeks post-surgery. The primary outcome was assessed using the Olerud-Molander Ankle Score (OMAS) questionnaire at 12 weeks post-surgery, with secondary measures at two, six, 24, and 52 weeks. Exploratory cost-effectiveness analyses were also performed.

Results

Overall, 130 participants returned their 12-week OMAS questionnaires. The mean OMAS was significantly higher in the EMADE group compared with the immobilized group (62.0 (SD 20.9) vs 48.8 (SD 22.5)), with a clinically meaningful mean difference of 13.2 (95% CI 5.66 to 20.73; p < 0.001). These differences were maintained at week 24, with convergence by week 52. No intervention-related adverse events, including instability, were reported.

Conclusion

The EMADE programme demonstrated an accelerated recovery compared to traditional six-week cast immobilization for those who have undergone ORIF surgery to stabilize Weber B (AO44B) ankle fractures. The study found the EMADE intervention to be safe.

Is immediate weight bearing safe for subtrochanteric femur fractures in elderly patients treated by cephalomedullary nailing? A multicentric study in one hundred eighty-two patients

PURPOSE

Biomechanical superiority of intramedullary nails over extramedullary implants has been proved for subtrochanteric fractures. Nevertheless, postoperative management of these patients has not changed, with high rates of protected weight-bearing after intramedullary nailing. The purpose of this study is to determine the mechanical complications of immediate postoperative full weigh-bearing for subtrochanteric femur fractures in elderly patients treated with a cephalomedullary nail.

METHODS

We performed a retrospective case series study from patients treated with a cephalomedullary nail for subtrochanteric fractures (AO/OTA 31A.3 and 32A-32C) over a nine-year period. Patients in the immediate full weight-bearing (IFWB) group received orders for immediate full weight bear as tolerated on postoperative 48 h. Patients in the non- or limited- weight-bearing (NLWB) group received orders not to full weight bear in the immediate postoperative.

RESULTS

There were five (2.7%) cases of implant failure including four cutouts and one nail breakage that needed a reoperation. Of them, one (2.2%) followed the NLWB protocol and four (2.9%) followed the IFWB protocol. Mean length of stay was 7.9 days (median 8, range 3-21) in the NLWB group and 10.7 days (median 8, range 2-60) in the IWBAT group. The NLWB group observed a 2.8-day shorter postoperative length of stay when compared to the IFWB, but the median remained equal.

CONCLUSION

This study suggests that geriatric patients with subtrochanteric fractures treated by intramedullary nailing and in which a good fracture reduction was achieved, may be able to tolerate immediate postoperative full weight-bearing, not increasing reoperation rates due to implant failure.

Full weight bearing after internal fixation of isolated distal fibular fractures with anatomically contoured locking plates: Our institutional experience

Isolated fractures of the distal fibula mainly affect young, active people. In most cases, fixation is by open reduction with or without casting for six weeks without weight bearing. The current trend is to reduce this period of non-weight-bearing in order to promote earlier functional rehabilitation. The improved mechanical stability resulting from the use of plates with locking screws has changed the postoperative management of many fractures, but there is little evidence for the ankle. Between October 2013 and August 2015, 36 patients were enrolled in a prospective study to evaluate the performance of internal fixation of isolated distal fibular fractures using a lateral anatomically contoured titanium locking plate (InitialA® plate from Newclip Technics, Haute Goulaine, France) with immediate mobilisation and full weight bearing. No patient required further surgery due to mechanical failure or non-union. The bone healing rate was 100 % at 3 months. Two patients had septic complications requiring plate removal and antibiotic treatment and were eventually cured. The use of anatomically contoured locking plates provides strong and stable fixation, allowing immediate full weight-bearing. Such a technique has the advantage of a short recovery time and an early return to work without additional complications.

A comparison of energy expenditure and perceived exertion between standard axillary crutches, knee scooters, and a hands-free crutch

BACKGROUND

Ambulation using standard axillary crutches (SACs) is associated with increased energy expenditure (EE) and decreased ability to perform activities of daily living (ADLs). Using a hands-free crutch (HFC) displays potential for easier completion of ADLs and reduction in energy requirements.

OBJECTIVES

To determine if a HFC elicits lower EE and heart rate (HR), improvement in performance of ADLs, and decreased rating of perceived exertion (RPE) compared to common ambulatory devices.

DESIGN

A randomized crossover-controlled trial.

SETTING

University community.

PARTICIPANTS

Twenty healthy college students.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Participants completed a 6-minute walk test at 50 m/min, an ADLs course, and a two-flight stair climb with SACs, HFC, knee scooter (KS), and unassisted ambulation (UA). The order of trial conditions was randomized. EE, HR, time to complete ADLs course and stair climb, and RPE during each condition were obtained. One-way analyses of variance were performed to compare EE, HR response, and RPE between the assistive devices and UA.

RESULTS

In all outcomes UA resulted in lower EE, HR, and RPE compared to all the assistive devices (p < .05). For the ADLs course, EE was the same for the three assistive devices, whereas HR was significantly lower for HFC compared to SACs and KS (p < .05). RPE for HFC and KS was lower than SACs (p < .05). For the 6MWT, each device significantly differed from the other devices for EE, HR, and RPE, with KS eliciting the lowest values, followed by HFC. For the stair climbing task, HFC elicited lower EE, HR, and RPE than SACs. Fourteen participants indicated their overall preference for HFCs.

CONCLUSIONS

In individuals prescribed weight-bearing restrictions, using a HFC may offer an easier and more preferred alternative to more commonly used SACs during ambulation, stair climbing, and other ADLs.

The effect of early weight-bearing and later weight-bearing rehabilitation interventions on outcomes after ankle fracture surgery: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials

OBJECTIVE

This systematic review aimed to analyse the effect of early weight bearing versus late weight bearing on rehabilitation outcomes after ankle fractures, which primarily include ankle function scores, time to return to work/daily life and complication rates.

METHODS

The China National Knowledge Infrastructure, Wanfang Data Knowledge Service Platform, China Science and Technology Journal, Web of Science, PubMed, Embase and Cochrane Library databases were searched. The focus was on identifying randomised controlled trials centred on early weight-bearing interventions for post-operative ankle fracture rehabilitation. All databases were searched for eligible studies published within the period from database inception to 20 June 2023. The eligible studies were screened according to the inclusion criteria. Study quality was evaluated using the methodology recommended by the Cochrane Handbook for the Systematic Evaluation of Interventions. Two authors independently performed the literature search and data extraction. Eligible studies were subjected to meta-analyses using Review Manager 5.3. Based on the time points at which post-operative ankle function was reported in the studies included in this paper, we decided to perform a meta-analysis of ankle function scores at 6 weeks post-operatively, 12 weeks post-operatively, 24-26 weeks post-operatively and 1 year post-operatively.

RESULTS

A total of 11 papers, comprising 862 patients, were included. Meta-analysis indicated that patients receiving early weight-bearing interventions, which referred to weight-bearing for 6 weeks post-operatively, experienced enhancements in ankle function scores (Olerud-Molander score, AOFAS score or Baird-Jackson score) at various post-operative milestones: 6 weeks (SMD = 0.69, 95% CI: 0.49-0.88 and p < 0.01), 12 weeks (SMD = 0.57, 95% CI: 0.22-0.92 and p < 0.01) and the 24-26 weeks range (SMD = 0.52, 95% CI: 0.20-0.85 and p < 0.01). The results of subgroup analyses revealed that the effects of early weight-bearing interventions were influenced by ankle range-of-motion exercises. Additionally, early weight bearing allows patients to return to daily life and work earlier, which was evaluated by time when they resumed their preinjury activities (MD = -2.74, 95% CI: -3.46 to -2.02 and p < 0.01), with no distinct elevation in the incidence of complications (RR = 1.49, 95% CI: 0.85-2.61 and p > 0.05).

CONCLUSION

The results showed that early weight bearing is effective in improving ankle function among post-operative ankle fracture patients and allows patients to return to daily life earlier. Significantly, the safety profile of early weight bearing remains favourable, with no higher risk of complications than late weight bearing.

Comparing immediate and delayed weight bearing in patients with ankle open reduction internal fixation-A protocol for feasibility randomised controlled trial

Introduction

Uncertainty regarding the timing of weight bearing following ankle open reduction internal fixation (ORIF) in patients with different ankle fracture patterns remains. Traditional rehabilitation methods, including six weeks of non-weight bearing (NWB), is still a common approach in many hospitals, while some previous evidence has shown immediate weight bearing (IWB) to be beneficial.

Method

32 adult participants with unimalleolar, bimalleolar or trimalleolar ankle fractures and stable fixation following ankle ORIF will be randomly allocated to either Immediate Weight Bearing (IWB) or Delayed Weight Bearing (DWB) groups. Stability of fixation is a subjective assessment made by the operating surgeon at the completion of fixation and is independent of fracture pattern. Participants in the IWB group will be allowed to weight bear as tolerated within 24 h, while participants in the DWB group will remain non-weight bearing for six weeks. Participants' data including Olerud and Molander Ankle Score, Self-Reported Foot and Ankle Score, SF-36 health survey, time to return to work will be collected. X-rays will be assessed by orthopaedic team members for fixation-related complications including reduction loss, malreduction/malunion, implant failure and non-union. Participants data will be collected at six weeks, three and six-months post-surgery. We will determine the feasibility of a full RCT through assessing the recruitment rate, adherence rate, and drop-out rate.

Results

Not applicable.This pilot RCT will endeavour to optimise standard rehabilitation protocols post ankle ORIF.

Range of motion measurements do not correlate with patient reported outcome measures in the early post-operative period following ankle fracture

BACKGROUND

Early mobilization following ankle fracture open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) improves long-term patient functionality. Because of this, numerous resources have been spent to increase patient adherence to post-operative mobilization, with range of motion (ROM) measurements generally considered an important outcome in patient recovery. In this study we investigated how ankle ROM correlates to patient function, self-sufficiency in performing activities of daily living (ADLs), and pain in the early post-operative period.

METHODS

This was a prospective, observational study on patients undergoing ORIF of ankle fractures. We collected patient reported outcome measures (PROMs) and ROM measurements at the 2-week, 6-week, 12-week, and 6 month post-operative visit. We collected three PROMs: pain intensity (VAS), pain self-efficacy questionnaire (PSEQ-2), and foot and ankle ability measurement (FAAM). ROM of the ankle was measured by goniometer. ANOVA and post-hoc Tukey tests were used to examine statistical differences in PROMs over time. Pearson correlation tests were used to examine the association between ROM and PROMs.

RESULTS

One-hundred and twenty-three participants enrolled in this study in the perioperative period. Pain intensity was higher at enrollment compared to week 6 (post-hoc p = 0.006), after which pain intensity did not differ significantly. FAAM scores for activities or daily living (ADL) were increased at all study visits compared to enrollment (post-hoc p < 0.001). FAAM-Sports scores were higher compared to enrollment at the week 12 and 6 month visits (post-hoc p < 0.001). No significant improvements in goniometer measurements were noted across any timepoints. There were no significant correlations between ROM and PROMs at any of the study visits.

CONCLUSION

In our cohort of patients, there was no correlation between ROM and patient pain, self-efficacy or functionality in the early post-operative period following ankle ORIF. The lack of correlation between PROMs and ROM indicates that ROM may be both a poor indicator of patient improvement for physicians to guide post-operative treatment as well as a poor motivator for patient adherence to post-operative exercises. In the future, it is important to study reliable outcome measures in early recovery that can be utilized to track patient recovery from ankle ORIF.

Postoperative mobilization after terrible triad injury: systematic review and single-arm meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Terrible triad injury is a complex injury of the elbow, involving elbow dislocation with associated fracture of the radial head, avulsion or tear of the lateral ulnar collateral ligament, and fracture of the coronoid. These injuries are commonly managed surgically with fixation or replacement of the radial head and repair of the collateral ligaments with or without fixation of the coronoid. Postoperative mobilization is a significant factor that may affect patient outcomes; however, the optimal postoperative mobilization protocol is unclear. This study aimed to systematically review the available literature regarding postoperative rehabilitation of terrible triad injuries to aid clinical decision making.

METHODS

We systematically reviewed the PubMed, Embase, Cochrane, and CINAHL (Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature) databases in accordance with Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. The inclusion criteria were studies with populations aged ≥16 years with terrible triad injury in which operative treatment was performed, a clear postoperative mobilization protocol was defined, and the Mayo Elbow Performance Score (MEPS) was reported. Secondary outcomes were pain, instability, and range of motion (ROM). Postoperative mobilization was classified as either "early," defined as active ROM commencement before or up to 14 days, or "late," defined as active ROM commencement after 14 days.

RESULTS

A total of 119 articles were identified from the initial search, of which 11 (301 patients) were included in the final review. The most common protocols (6 studies) favored early mobilization, whereas 5 studies undertook late mobilization. Meta-regression analysis including mobilization as a covariate showed an estimated mean difference in the pooled mean MEPS between early and late mobilization of 6.1 (95% confidence interval, 0.2-12) with a higher pooled mean MEPS for early mobilization (MEPS, 91.2) than for late mobilization (MEPS, 85; P = .041). Rates of instability reported ranged from 4.5% to 19% (8%-11.5% for early mobilization and 4.5%-19% for late mobilization).

CONCLUSION

Our findings suggest that early postoperative mobilization may confer a benefit in terms of functional outcomes following surgical management of terrible triad injuries without appearing to confer an increased instability risk. Further research in the form of randomized controlled trials between early and late mobilization is advised to provide a higher level of evidence.

Early Versus Delayed Weight Bearing and Mobilization After Ankle Fracture Fixation Surgery: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials

The purpose of this review was to determine whether there is a benefit to early weight bearing or mobilization in surgically treated ankle fractures. All randomized controlled trials that analyzed early vs delayed weight bearing and/or mobilization after an ankle surgery were included. The primary outcome measure was the pooled Olerud Molander Ankle Score 1 year postoperatively. No significant differences in ankle function were found at 1 year postoperatively between early and delayed weight bearing and mobilization. The 12-week results demonstrated superior early ankle function scores for patients who had early weight bearing. Patients who had early mobilization were at increased risk for postoperative complications. In surgically treated ankle fractures, early weight bearing resulted in improved short-term ankle function scores. [Orthopedics. 2024;47(2):71-78.].

Early Weight-bearing Following Surgical Treatment of Ankle Fractures Without Trans-syndesmotic Fixation Is Safe and Improves Short-term Outcomes

OBJECTIVES

The objective of this study was to ascertain outcome differences after fixation of unstable rotational ankle fractures allowed to weight-bear 2 weeks postoperatively compared with 6 weeks.

METHODS

DESIGN

Prospective case-control study.

SETTING

Academic medical center; Level 1 trauma center.

PATIENT SELECTION CRITERIA

Patients with unstable ankle fractures (OTA/AO:44A-C) undergoing open reduction internal fixation (ORIF) were enrolled. Patients requiring trans-syndesmotic fixation were excluded. Two surgeons allowed weight-bearing at 2 weeks postoperatively (early weight-bearing [EWB] cohort). Two other surgeons instructed standard non-weight-bearing until 6 weeks postoperatively (non-weight-bearing cohort).

OUTCOME MEASURES AND COMPARISONS

The main outcome measures included the Olerud-Molander questionnaire, the SF-36 questionnaire, and visual analog scale at 6 weeks, 3 months, 6 months, and 12 months postoperatively and complications, return to work, range of ankle motion, and reoperations at 12 months were compared between the 2 cohorts.

RESULTS

One hundred seven patients were included. The 2 cohorts did not differ in demographics or preinjury scores ( P > 0.05). Six weeks postoperatively, EWB patients had improved functional outcomes as measured by the Olerud-Molander and SF-36 questionnaires. Early weight-bearing patients also had better visual analog scale scores (standardized mean difference -0.98, 95% confidence interval [CI] -1.27 to -0.70, P < 0.05) and a greater proportion returning to full capacity work at 6 weeks (odds ratio = 3.42, 95% CI, 1.08-13.07, P < 0.05). One year postoperatively, EWB patients had improved pain measured by SF-36 (standardized mean difference 6.25, 95% CI, 5.59-6.92, P < 0.01) and visual analog scale scores (standardized mean difference -0.05, 95% CI, -0.32 to 0.23, P < 0.01). There were no differences in complications or reoperation at 12 months ( P > 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

EWB patients had improved early function, final pain scores, and earlier return to work, without an increased complication rate compared with those kept non-weight-bearing for 6 weeks.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Therapeutic Level II. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Safety of early weightbearing after ankle fracture fixation

PURPOSE

Patients with surgically treated ankle fractures are traditionally kept non-weightbearing for at least six weeks post-operatively; however, recent literature suggests numerous benefits of early weightbearing (EWB) before six weeks without significantly impacting long-term outcomes. This study aims to review the safety of early vs late weightbearing following ankle fracture fixation by assessing the complication rate.

METHODS

This was a single-centre retrospective study. Between 2020 and 2023, all ankle fixations that commenced weightbearing at two weeks were added to the EWB group. An equal number of similar patients with six-week non-weightbearing were added to the late weightbearing (LWB) group. Baseline characteristics, risk factors, types of fractures and any complications in the six-month post-operative period were evaluated from these cohorts.

RESULTS

In total, 459 ankle fixations were identified of which 87 patients met the criteria for the EWB group, with a further 87 added to the LWB group. There was no significant difference in age between the two groups (51.7 ± 20.1 vs 51.0 ± 15.5, respectively; p = 0.81), but more female patients and diabetics in the EWB group. Fracture types were similar between both cohorts (p = 0.51). Complication rate in the EWB group was not significantly different to the LWB group (5 vs 9, p > 0.05).

CONCLUSION

No increase in complication rate was identified by commencing weightbearing early at two weeks after ankle fixation compared to six weeks. We therefore suggest EWB if appropriate, given its associated benefits including restoration of patient independence and improved quality of life.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Therapeutic, Level IV.

3D printing technology combined with personalized plates for complex distal intra-articular fractures of the trimalleolar ankle

This study investigated the effectiveness of 3D printing technology in combination with personalized custom-made steel plates in the treatment of complex distal intra-articular trimalleolar fractures, with the aim of providing a new approach to improve ankle joint function in patients. The 48 patients with complex distal intra-articular trimalleolar fractures included in the study were randomly divided into two groups: the personalized custom-made steel plate group (n = 24) and the conventional steel plate group (n = 24). A comparison was made between the two groups in terms of preoperative preparation time, hospitalization duration, surgical time, fracture reduction and internal fixation time, intraoperative fluoroscopy instances, surgical incision length, fracture healing time, follow-up duration, degree of fracture reduction, ankle joint functional recovery, and the occurrence of complications. The personalized steel plate group exhibited longer preoperative preparation time and hospitalization duration compared to the conventional steel plate group (p < 0.001). However, the personalized steel plate group demonstrated significantly shorter surgical duration, time for fracture reduction and internal fixation, reduced intraoperative fluoroscopy frequency, and a shorter overall surgical incision length (p < 0.001). Both groups displayed similar fracture healing times and follow-up durations (p > 0.05). The personalized steel plate group showed a higher rate of successful fracture reduction (87.5% vs. 79.2%, p > 0.05) and a lower incidence of complications (8.3% vs. 20.8%, p = 0.22), although these differences did not reach statistical significance. Furthermore, the personalized steel plate group exhibited superior ankle joint function scores during follow-up compared to the conventional steel plate group (p < 0.05). By utilizing 3D printing technology in conjunction with personalized custom-made steel plates, personalized treatment plans are provided for patients with complex comminuted tri-malleolar ankle fractures, enabling safer, more efficient, and satisfactory orthopedic surgeries.

Comparison between Exercise Program-Foot Orthoses Treatment and Exercise Program Alone after Pilon Fracture Surgery: Study Protocol for a Randomized Controlled Trial

The management of tibial pilon fractures is challenging and often leads to complications and limitations in ankle function. The study aims to investigate myotonometric parameters and muscle strength of ankle muscles, as well as gait pattern and balance among patients following surgical treatment of pilon fractures. The randomized controlled study will analyze the differences between the patients who will follow a 3-month physical exercise program and will wear customized foot orthoses (i.e., customized orthotic arch support insoles) versus patients who will attend only the physical exercise program. For each group, at least 21 patients will be required. The assessment involves four different testing procedures: myotonometry (anterior tibialis, medial and lateral gastrocnemius, and longus peroneus assessed using MyotonPRO), muscle strength testing (ankle dorsiflexors, plantar flexors, and peroneal muscles assessed using MicroFET2 dynamometer), analysis of gait parameters (using Scheinworks treadmill), and double-leg and single-leg balance tests (using K-Force plate). After 3 months, the assessments will record which of the two treatments (physical exercise program with or without wearing customized foot orthoses) has better outcomes in regaining ankle muscle properties and tone, as well as the restoration of gait and balance.

Does early post-operative exercise influence bone healing kinetics? Preclinical evaluation of non-critical sized femur defect healing

Physical exercise is a well-known modality for maintaining healthy locomotor mechanism. A detailed preclinical research on physical exercise effect on bone healing kinetics could help to improve the rehabilitation process after fracture treatment and bone remodeling. Our aim was to evaluate the effect of early post-operative exercise effect on bone microstructural changes in a rat model. Twenty Sprague Dawley male rats underwent bi-cortical 1.6 mm hole drilling in both femur diaphysis, after which (n = 10) underwent continuous treadmill training (TR) over two weeks, while the other group of rats (n = 10) was assigned to non-training (NT) control group. New bone formation labeling was performed by subcutaneous fluorochrome injections at day 5, 14 and 31. In vivo micro-computed tomography (μCT) scans were performed once a week during the 6-week post-operative period. Ten animals (five from each group) were euthanized at 3rd week while remaining animals were euthanized at 6th week. Femur samples were extracted and underwent ex vivo μCT and histological evaluation, while serum was used for evaluating alkaline phosphatase (ALP). μCT data demonstrated increased volume and surface of newly formed bone in defect area of TR group. Bone volume/Tissue volume (BV/TV) ratio and number of osteocytes showed an increase in TR group after 3-week period. Fluorochrome distances were increased between day 5 and 14 within the training group. Serum ALP level increased in both groups over 3- and 6-weeks. Post-operative exercise increases the bone healing kinetics and stimulates the new bone formation during and after the training protocol has ended.

Very early prescription of range of motion exercises in ankle fractures treated with ORIF does not increase the rate of complications and reoperations: A survival risk analysis

BACKGROUND

Ankle fractures are commonly treated with non-surgical or surgical (preferably ORIF) approaches based on fracture characteristics. The postoperative care regimens vary widely, and the impact of very early mobilization on complications and reoperation rates in ankle fractures treated with ORIF remains unclear.

METHODS

A retrospective analysis was conducted on ankle fractures treated between January 2014 and November 2020. Demographic and fracture characteristic data were collected. Very early prescription of range of motion exercises was defined as initiation within the first week after surgery, typically between the second and seventh postoperative day. Complications, reoperations, and time to these events were analyzed. Kaplan Meier survival analysis was performed to assess the risk of complications with very early mobilization.

RESULTS

A total of 299 patients met the inclusion criteria. The cohort included 83 unimalleolar, 77 bimalleolar, and 138 trimalleolar fractures. Of the patients, 116 (38.8%) underwent very early range of motion. Complications occurred in 45 events among 39 patients (13%), with 16 events (41%) in the very early range of motion group. Reoperations were required for 23 patients (3.67% of the cohort). No statistically significant differences were found in the analysis of complications, with a hazard ratio (HR) of 1.17, and in the adjusted analysis with an HR of 1.12. Similarly, the reoperation analysis showed no significant differences, with an HR of 0.85 and 0.68 in the adjusted analysis.

CONCLUSION

Very early prescription of range of motion exercises in ankle fractures treated with ORIF is a safe approach, as it does not increase the rates of complications or reoperations compared to early or late mobilization. This study supports the use of very early mobilization as a rehabilitation method for ankle fractures.

Early postoperative step count and walking time have greater impact on lower limb fracture outcomes than load-bearing metrics

INTRODUCTION

Weight-bearing protocols for rehabilitation of lower extremity fractures are the gold standard despite not being data-driven. Additionally, current protocols are focused on the amount of weight placed on the limb, negating other patient rehabilitation behaviors that may contribute to outcomes. Wearable sensors can provide insight into multiple aspects of patient behavior through longitudinal monitoring. This study aimed to understand the relationship between patient behavior and rehabilitation outcomes using wearable sensors to identify the metrics of patient rehabilitation behavior that have a positive effect on 1-year rehabilitation outcomes.

METHODS

Prospective observational study on 42 closed ankle and tibial fracture patients. Rehabilitation behavior was monitored continuously between 2 and 6 weeks post-operative using a gait monitoring insole. Metrics describing patient rehabilitation behavior, including step count, walking time, cadence, and body weight per step, were compared between patient groups of excellent and average rehabilitation outcomes, as defined by the 1-year Patient Reported Outcome Measure Physical Function t-score (PROMIS PF). A Fuzzy Inference System (FIS) was used to rank metrics based on their impact on patient outcomes. Additionally, correlation coefficients were calculated between patient characteristics and principal components of the behavior metrics.

RESULTS

Twenty-two patients had complete insole data sets, and 17 of which had 1-year PROMIS PF scores (33.7 ± 14.5 years of age, 13 female, 9 in Excellent group, 8 in Average group). Step count had the highest impact ranking (0.817), while body weight per step had a low impact ranking (0.309). No significant correlation coefficients were found between patient or injury characteristics and behavior principal components. General patient rehabilitation behavior was described through cadence (mean of 71.0 steps/min) and step count (logarithmic distribution with only ten days exceeding 5,000 steps/day).

CONCLUSION

Step count and walking time had a greater impact on 1-year outcomes than body weight per step or cadence. The results suggest that increased activity may improve 1-year outcomes for patients with lower extremity fractures. The use of more accessible devices, such as smart watches with step counters combined with patient reported outcome measures may provide more valuable insights into patient rehabilitation behaviors and their effect on rehabilitation outcomes.

Immediate weight bearing without immobilization for operatively treated ankle fractures is safe - A systematic review

BACKGROUND

This systematic literature review compared weight bearing (WB) vs. partial- / non-weight bearing (NWB) and mobilization (MB) vs. immobilization (IMB) for surgically treated ankle fractures.

METHODS

Five databases were searched. Eligible were (quasi-)randomized controlled trials comparing at least two different postoperative treatment protocols. The risk of bias was assessed using the RoB-2 toolkit. The primary outcome was complication rate, secondary outcome Olerud and Molander Ankle Score (OMAS), range of motion (ROM), and return to work (RTW).

RESULTS

Out of 10,345 studies, 24 papers were eligible. Thirteen studies (n = 853) compared WB/NWB, 13 studies (n = 706) MB/IMB with a moderate study quality. WB did not increase the risk for complications but resulted in superior short-term outcomes for OMAS, ROM, RTW. 12 studies found no inferior results for MB compared to IMB.

CONCLUSION

Early and immediate WB and MB do not increase the complication rates but result in superior short term outcome scores.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level I Systematic Review.

In Vivo Foot Segmental Motion and Coupling Analysis during Midterm Follow-Up after the Open Reduction Internal Fixation of Trimalleolar Fractures

PURPOSE

Trimalleolar ankle fractures (TAFs) are common traumatic injuries. Studies have described postoperative clinical outcomes in relation to fracture morphology, but less is known about foot biomechanics, especially in patients treated for TAFs. The aim of this study was to analyze segmental foot mobility and joint coupling during the gait of patients after TAF treatment.

METHODS

Fifteen patients, surgically treated for TAFs, were recruited. The affected side was compared to their non-affected side, as well as to a healthy control subject. The Rizzoli foot model was used to quantify inter-segment joint angles and joint coupling. The stance phase was observed and divided into sub-phases. Patient-reported outcome measures were evaluated.

RESULTS

Patients treated for TAFs showed a reduced range of motion in the affected ankle during the loading response (3.8 ± 0.9) and pre-swing phase (12.7 ± 3.5) as compared to their non-affected sides (4.7 ± 1.1 and 16.1 ± 3.1) and the control subject. The dorsiflexion of the first metatarsophalangeal joint during the pre-swing phase was reduced (19.0 ± 6.5) when compared to the non-affected side (23.3 ± 8.7). The affected side's Chopart joint showed an increased range of motion during the mid-stance (1.3 ± 0.5 vs. 1.1 ± 0.6). Smaller joint coupling was observed on both the patient-affected and non-affected sides compared to the controls.

CONCLUSION

This study indicates that the Chopart joint compensates for changes in the ankle segment after TAF osteosynthesis. Furthermore, reduced joint-coupling was observed. However, the minimal case numbers and study power limited the effect size of this study. Nevertheless, these new insights could help to elucidate foot biomechanics in these patients, adjusting rehabilitation programs, thereby lowering the risk of postoperative long-term complications.

I'll be back - Predictive validity of adults' expectations for recovery after fractures - A longitudinal observational study

PURPOSE

Recovery after fractures due to accidents relates to all aspects of the biopsychosocial model. Therefore, it is difficult for the patients to foresee the consequences of the fractures. This study aimed to examine 1) patients' expectations regarding the impact of the injury on everyday life, 2) predictive validity of their expectations after six months, and 3) factors that predict a return to work.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Patients were 18-64 years old and hospitalized with simple or compound/multiple fractures due to an accident. During admission, structured interviews were conducted with a questionnaire covering working conditions, expectations regarding recovery, sports, economy, family, household, and return to work. Additionally, mental and physical status were covered with Short Musculoskeletal Function Assessment questionnaire (SMFA) and Short Form 36, and working conditions were uncovered too. After six months, telephonic interviews were conducted with the 164 available patients to elucidate the impact of the fractures on everyday life, their health status, and sick leave. Likelihood ratios, post-test probabilities, and logistic regression analysis were performed to establish if patients' expectations predicted recovery, economy, sports, family, household, and return to work.

RESULTS

Few patients' baseline expectations about everyday life were met. The likelihood ratios were small, and the post-test probabilities for expectations consistent with outcomes were between 18% and 68%, with recovery as the lowest and participation in sports as the highest. In the multivariate analysis, patients' expectations did not predict short-term (less than two months) or long-term sick leave (more than three months). Self-rated health and the bother index of SMFA were significant short-term and long-term predictors for sick leave. Additionally, vitality, pain, and decision latitude at work predicted sick leave of less than two months.

CONCLUSION

A few days after the accident, patients' expectations about everyday life are not associated with outcomes six months later. Likelihood ratios indicate difficulties for the patients in predicting fractures' consequences on various aspects of everyday life. Return to work was associated with self-rated health and the bother index of SMFA. Future research should examine if fracture patients can benefit from comprehensive, individual counseling during admission to set appropriate expectations.

Characteristics and Effectiveness of Postoperative Rehabilitation Strategies in Ankle Fractures: A Systematic Review

OBJECTIVES

To explore the characteristics and to report on the effectiveness of postoperative rehabilitation strategies for people with an ankle fracture.

DATA SOURCES

PubMed, Cochrane Library, EMBASE, Web of Science, and CINAHL were searched to identify studies published from January 2010 to November 2021.

STUDY SELECTION

Studies that described or evaluated postoperative rehabilitation strategies for surgically repaired ankle fractures were included.

DATA EXTRACTION

Data on postoperative rehabilitation were extracted in accordance with the Template for Intervention Description and Replication guide. Quality was assessed using the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute's Study Quality Assessment Tools.

DATA SYNTHESIS

Meta-analysis was planned to look at the effectiveness of postoperative rehabilitation strategies. Forty studies described postoperative rehabilitation strategies without evaluating effectiveness, whereas 15 studies focused on evaluating effectiveness. Because of the large variety in postoperative strategies and outcomes, narrative synthesis was deemed most suitable to answer our aims. Characteristics of postoperative rehabilitation strategies varied widely and were poorly described in a way that could not be replicated. Most of the studies (48%) used a late weight-bearing approach, although definitions and details around weight-bearing were unclear.

CONCLUSIONS

Late weight-bearing has been the most common postoperative approach reported in the past 10 years. The variety of definitions around weight-bearing and the lack of details of rehabilitation regimens limit replication and affect current clinical practice. The authors propose to adopt consistent definitions and terminology around postoperative practices such as weight-bearing to improve evidence for effectiveness and ultimately patient outcomes.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Therapeutic Level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Early versus late weight bearing & ankle mobilization in the postoperative management of ankle fractures: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

BACKGROUND

While open reduction and internal fixation is currently considered the optimum treatment option for displaced ankle fractures, the most optimal post-operative rehabilitation strategy in this setting remains unclear. The objective of this investigation was to compare the effect of early vs. late weight bearing and ankle mobilization in the post-operative management of ankle fractures.

METHODS

Medline, Embase, CENTRAL, Scopus, CINHAL, and Web of Science were searched to identify randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and quasi-RCTs. Two review authors screened articles, abstracted data, and evaluated risk of bias in duplicate. Outcomes of interest included post-operative ankle function and overall time to return to work. Studies on weight bearing and ankle mobilization were analysed separately and all data were pooled using random-effects models.

RESULTS

Eighteen trials were included in the review of which 14 were included in the meta-analysis of at least one outcome of interest. Majority of the studies presented a high overall risk of bias. Early weight bearing demonstrated significantly better short-term postoperative functional scores at 6-9 weeks postoperatively (SMD: 0.39, 95% CI: 0.19, 0.58; p < 0.0001; I² = 0%). However, the functional effect of early weight bearing compared to late weight bearing gradually became equivalent by the 6 month postoperative time-period. Early weight bearing also demonstrated a significant reduction in the time to return to work/daily activities (MD: -12.29, 95% CI: -17.39, -7.19; p < 0.0001; I² = 0%). In comparison, no significant differences were found between early ankle mobilization/exercises and immobilization.

CONCLUSION

Our findings suggest a potential role of EWB in improving post-operative ankle-function in the short-term and reducing the overall time to return to work/daily activities, but no clinical benefit associated with early ankle mobilization post-surgery.

Weight-bearing Allowed Following Internal Fixation of Ankle Fractures, a Systematic Literature Review and Meta-Analysis

BACKGROUND

Postoperative management regimes vary following open reduction and internal fixation of unstable ankle fractures. Traditional postoperative nonweightbearing cast immobilization may prevent loss of fixation and protect the soft tissue envelope but may also be associated with poorer functional outcomes. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to compare the complication rate and functional outcomes of early weightbearing (EWB) vs late weightbearing (LWB) following open reduction and internal fixation of ankle fractures.

METHODS

We performed a systematic review with a meta-analysis of controlled trials and comparative cohort studies using 3 databases. We included all studies that investigated the effect of weightbearing following internal fixation of ankle fractures in adult patients by any means. Studies that investigated mobilization but not weightbearing, non-English-language publications, and tibial Plafond fractures were excluded from this systematic review. We assessed the risk of bias using ROB 2 tools for randomized controlled trials and ROBINS-1 for cohort studies. Data extraction was performed using Covidence online software and meta-analysis by using RevMan 5.3.

RESULTS

This systematic review included 10 randomized controlled trials and 4 comparative cohort studies. Most of the included studies were rated as having some concern with regard to the risk of bias. There was no significant difference in the complication rate between the protected EWB and LWB groups (the risk ratio [RR] for infection was 1.30, 95% CI 0.74, 2.30; I² = 0%; P = .36), but better functional outcome scores were detected in the EWB group only at 6 weeks postoperatively (MD =10.08, 95% CI 5.13, 15.02; I² = 0%; P ≤ .0001), with no significant difference seen at 6 or 12 months postoperatively.

CONCLUSION

Based on the studies reviewed, it appears that early protected weightbearing following open reduction and internal fixation of ankle fractures does not affect surgical incision or fracture healing and is associated with better early functional outcomes at 6 weeks, but not 6 or 12 months, postoperatively.

Early Return to Daily Life through Immediate Weight-Bearing after Lateral Malleolar Fracture Surgery

Lateral malleolus fracture is one of the most common fractures. However, there is controversy regarding the rehabilitation protocols used after surgery. In particular, the initiation point for weight-bearing has not been standardized. In the present study, we investigated the prognostic difference between immediate and delayed weight-bearing on lateral malleolus fractures. The medical records of matched patients in the immediate and delayed weight-bearing groups (50 and 50, respectively) were reviewed retrospectively. All patients were treated with open reduction and internal fixation using an anatomical locking compression plate with a lag screw. In the immediate weight-bearing group (IWB), tolerable weight-bearing (i.e., what can be endured immediately after surgery with crutches) was permitted. In the delayed weight-bearing group (DWB), weight-bearing was completely restricted for 4 weeks after surgery. Ankle motion exercise was permitted in both groups, starting from the day after surgery. Radiographic assessment data and clinical outcomes were reviewed between the two groups. No significant differences in radiographic assessments and complications were found between the two groups. Significant differences in terms of a shortened length of hospital stay and time to return to work with the IWB rehabilitation protocol compared with DWB were confirmed (6.0 vs. 9.2 days, p = 0.02 and 6.1 vs. 8.3 weeks, p = 0.02, respectively). A significant difference in sport factor was observed in the Foot and Ankle Outcome Score at 3 months postoperatively (72.3 vs. 67.4, p = 0.02). We found no significant differences between the two groups concerning postoperative radiological outcomes and complications. The benefits of shortening the time to return to work and length of hospital stay associated with the IWB rehabilitation protocol were confirmed. In conclusion, immediate weight-bearing is recommended in patients with lateral malleolus fracture after anatomical reduction and firm fixation by surgery.

Measuring Recovery and Understanding Long-Term Deficits in Balance, Ankle Mobility and Hip Strength in People after an Open Reduction and Internal Fixation of Bimalleolar Fracture and Their Impact on Functionality: A 12-Month Longitudinal Study

To analyze how balance and other physical capacities evolved after surgery in patients with a bimalleolar fracture and how these capacities and clinical variables (immobilization or unloading time) contribute to restoring patients’ functionality, 22 patients and 10 healthy people (HC) were assessed for static and dynamic balance (Y-Balance test, YBT), dorsiflexion ankle mobility (ADFROM) and hip strength at 6 and 12 months after surgery. Patients’ functional status was assessed through the Olerud Molander Ankle Score (OMAS) and the American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society (AOFAS) score. Twenty-one patients with ankle fractures who completed the study showed a worse static and dynamic balance at 6 months. The YBT in the anterior direction (YBTA) revealed balance deficits in the operated limb at 12 months compared to the non-operated limb (−5.6%) and the HC (−6.7%). They also showed a decreased ADFROM compared to the non-operated limb (−7.4°) and the HC (−11°). In addition, medium-term (6 months) deficits in abductor strength hip but no hip strength deficits were found at 12 months after surgery. Relative weight analyses showed that ADFROM and hip strength explained 35–63% of the YBTA variance and AOFAS/OMAS scores. Balance, hip strength and ADFROM seem to be reliable indexes for assessing the functional status of these patients. These results could help to understand the relationship between these physical capacities and the patients’ perceived functional status.

Weight-bearing in Trauma Surgery (WiTS) Study: A national survey of UK Trauma & Orthopaedic multidisciplinary health professionals

INTRODUCTION

Weight-bearing (WB) status following a fracture or surgical fixation is an important determinant of the mechanical environment for healing. In order for healthcare professionals to communicate and understand the extent of bearing weight through a limb, clear terminology must be used. There is widespread variation in the usage and definitions of WB terminology in the literature and clinical practice. This study sought to define the understanding and extent of variation across the United Kingdom.

METHODS

A nationwide online survey of UK-based Trauma & Orthopaedic (T&O) multidisciplinary healthcare professionals was conducted. Participants answered seven questions assessing their usage and understanding of various WB terminology.

RESULTS

A total of 707 responses were received: 48% by doctors, 32% by physiotherapists, 13% by occupational therapists and 7% from other healthcare professionals. In terms of understanding of WB terminology with respect to percentage body weight (BW), 89% of respondents interpret 'full WB' as 100% BW, 97% interpret 'non WB' as 0% BW, 80% interpret 'partial WB' as 50% BW, and 89% interpret 'touch/toe-touch WB' as 10% or 20% BW. There were statistically significant differences between the responses of doctors and therapists for these four terms, with doctors tending to give higher %BW values. 'Protected WB' and 'WB as tolerated' had less consensus and more variability in responses. The majority (68%) of respondents do not usually quantify terminology such as 'partial WB' with a value, and 94% agreed that standardisation of WB terminology would improve communication amongst professionals.

CONCLUSION

This study provides evidence of the substantial variation in the understanding of WB terminology amongst healthcare professionals, which likely results in ambiguous rehabilitation advice. Existing literature has shown that patients struggle to comply with terms such as 'partial weight-bearing'. We recommend consensus within the T&O multidisciplinary community to standardise and define common weight-bearing terminology.

Early Unprotected Weight Bearing and Pre-Scheduled Supervised Rehabilitation Program after Surgical Treatment of Ankle Fractures

BACKGROUND

Ankle fractures represent one of the most common orthopedic injuries in the lower extremity. Weight-bearing and rehabilitation protocols after surgical treatment of ankle fracture have recently evolved from traditional methods to full weight-bearing protocols. However, more evidence is needed on unprotected immediate weight-bearing along with a standardized rehabilitation program. The purpose of this study was to evaluate effects of unprotected immediate weight-bearing as tolerated and an eight-week prescheduled supervised rehabilitation program on the mid-term clinical and functional outcomes of surgically treated ankle fractures, and to compare functional results with the unaffected side.

METHODS

Eighty patients (24F and 56M) who underwent rigid fixation of bimalleolar ankle fractures were included (mean age 41.57±13.22 years). Preoperative radiographs and computed tomography scans were used to evaluate and classify the fractures. The fractures were classified using Lauge-Hansen classification system. Ankle ROMs, Pain Disability Index (PDI), American Orthopedic Foot and Ankle Society (AOFAS) Ankle-Hindfoot Scores, and Short Form-36 scores were evaluated. Patients were allowed unprotected weight-bearing on the immediate postoperative period and a standardized supervised prescheduled rehabilitation program was undertaken following surgery.

RESULTS

The mean follow-up period was 30.32±6.91 months. Based on Lauge-Hansen classification, supination-external rotation injuries were found in 32(40%) patients, supination adduction injuries in 14(17.4%) patients, pronation-external rotation injuries in 28(35%) patients, and pronation-abduction fractures in 6(7.6%) patients. The solid union was achieved in all patients at the final follow-up. The mean PDI score was 12.78±14.78, and the AOFAS score was 80.93±17.24. Although patients' health-related quality of life was at a good level, the injured-side ankle ROM was lower than the healthy side (p ≤ 0.05).

CONCLUSION

Satisfactory clinical and functional outcome can be achieved at mid-term with unprotected weight-bearing as tolerated and pre-scheduled supervised eight-week rehabilitation program following rigid internal fixation of ankle fractures. However, this protocol is not studied in patients with associated comorbidities.

Short-term results of gait analysis with the Heidelberg foot measurement method and functional outcome after operative treatment of ankle fractures

Background

Ankle fractures are common fractures in trauma surgery. Several studies have compared gait patterns between affected patients and control groups. However, no one used the Heidelberg Foot Measurement Method in combination with statistical parametric mapping of the entire gait cycle in this patient cohort. We sought to identify possible mobility deficits in the tibio-talar joint and medial arch in patients after ankle fractures as a sign of stiffness and pain that could result in a pathological gait pattern. We focused on the tibio-talar flexion as it is the main movement in the tibio-talar joint. Moreover, we examined the healing progress over time.

Methods

Fourteen patients with isolated ankle fractures were included prospectively. A gait analysis using the Heidelberg Foot Measurement Method was performed 9 and 26 weeks after surgery to analyse the tibio-talar dorsal flexion, the foot tibia dorsal flexion, the subtalar inversion and the medial arch as well as the cadence, the walking speed and the ground reaction force. The American Orthopedic Foot & Ankle Society ankle hindfoot score was used to obtain clinical data. Results were compared to those from 20 healthy participants. Furthermore, correlations between the American Orthopedic Foot & Ankle Society hindfoot score and the results of the gait analysis were evaluated.

Results

Statistical parametric mapping showed significant differences for the Foot Tibia Dorsal Flexion for patients after 9 weeks (53–75%: p = 0.001) and patients after 26 weeks (58–70%: p = 0.011) compared to healthy participants, respectively. Furthermore, significant differences regarding the tibio-talar dorsal flexion for patients 9 weeks after surgery (15–40%: p < 0.001; 56,5–70%: p = 0.007; 82–88%: p = 0.033; 97–98,5%: p = 0.048) as well as patients after 26 weeks (62,5–65%: p = 0.049) compared to healthy participants, respectively. There were no significant differences looking at the medial arch and the subtalar inversion. Moreover, significant differences regarding the ground reaction force were found for patients after 9 weeks (0–17%: p < 0.001; 21–37%: p < 0.001; 41–54%: p < 0.001; 60–64%: p = 0.013) as well as patients after 26 weeks (0–1,5%: p = 0.046; 5–15%: p < 0.001; 27–33%: p = 0.001; 45–49%: p = 0.005; 57–59%: p = 0.049) compared to healthy participants, respectively. In total, the range of motion in the tibio-talar joint and the medial arch was reduced in affected patients compared to healthy participants. Patients showed significant increase of the range of motion between 9 and 26 weeks.

Conclusions

This study shows, that patients affected by ankle fractures show limited mobility in the tibio-talar joint and the medial arch when compared to healthy participants. Even though the limitation of motion remains at least over a period of 26 weeks, a significant increase can be recognized over time. Furthermore, if we look at the absolute values, the patients’ values tend to get closer to those of the control group.

Trial registration

This study is registered at the German Clinical Trials Register (DRKS00023379).

An overview on the treatment and outcome factors of ankle fractures in elderly men and women aged 80 and over: a systematic review

INTRODUCTION

This article is a systematic review of the literature on elderly aged 80 and over with an ankle fracture. Low energy trauma fractures are a major public health burden in developed countries that have aged populations. Ankle fractures are the third most common fractures after hip and wrist fractures. The purpose of this review is to provide an overview of the treatments and the used outcome factors.

METHODS

PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, and CINAHL were searched to retrieve relevant studies. Studies published in English or Dutch concerning the treatment of ankle fractures in patients aged 80 and over were included.

RESULTS

Initially 2054 studies were found in the databases. After removing duplicate entries, 1182 remained. Finally, after screening six studies were included, of which three cohorts studies and three case series. Six different treatments were identified and described; ORIF, transarticular Steinmann pin, plaster cast with or without weight-bearing, Gallagher nail and the TCC nail. Furthermore, 32 outcome factors were identified.

DISCUSSION

The various studies show that practitioners are careful with early weight-bearing. However, if we look closely to the results and other literature, this seems not necessary and it could potentially be of great value to implement early weight-bearing in the treatment. Furthermore, quality of life seems underreported in this research field.

CONCLUSIONS

ORIF with plaster cast and permissive weight-bearing should be considered for this population since it seems to be a safe possibility for a majority of the relatively healthy patients aged 80 and over. In cases where surgery is contra-indicated and a plaster cast is the choice of treatment, early weight-bearing seems to have a positive influence on the outcome in the very old patient.

Early Advanced Weight-Bearing After Periarticular Fractures: A Randomized Trial Comparing Antigravity Treadmill Therapy Versus Standard of Care

SUMMARY

In current clinical practice, weight-bearing is typically restricted for up to 12 weeks after definitive fixation of lower extremity periarticular fractures. However, muscle atrophy resulting from restricting weight-bearing has a deleterious effect on bone healing and overall limb function. Antigravity treadmill therapy may improve recovery by allowing patients to safely load the limb during therapy, thereby reducing the negative consequences of prolonged non-weight-bearing while avoiding complications associated with premature return to full weight-bearing. This article describes a multicenter randomized controlled trial comparing outcomes after a 10-week antigravity treadmill therapy program versus standard of care in adult patients with periarticular fractures of the knee and distal tibia. The primary hypothesis is that, compared with patients receiving standard of care, patients receiving antigravity treadmill therapy will report better function 6 months after definitive treatment.

Quality of life and complications in elderly patients after pronation rotation type III ankle fractures treated with a cast and early weight-bearing

Background

Early weight-bearing is becoming increasingly common because it can positively affect the quality of life of patients. Therefore, the efficacy and safety of this conservative treatment should be assessed for different types of ankle fractures. The goal of this study was to compare early weight-bearing and non-weight-bearing in terms of effectiveness and safety in patients with pronation rotation type III ankle fractures treated nonsurgically.

Methods

A prospective multicenter cohort study was conducted over two years. Elderly patients with a nondisplaced pronation rotation type III ankle fracture were included. The main variables were the Barthel Index and SF-12 scores. The patients completed the questionnaires at six weeks, one year and two years. We also compared the complications associated with the two interventions.

Results

30 patients were included in the weight-bearing group, while 32 patients were included in the non-weight-bearing (WB) group. The mean ages were 82.6 ± 2.6 years and 83.1 ± 2.6 years, respectively. Quality of life, measured with the SF-12 scale, increased significantly in both the short and long term in the WB group (53.5 ± 5.8 points vs 65.2 ± 4.4 points at 6 weeks and 70.1 ± 4.2 points vs. 80.9 ± 3.7 points at 2 years; p<0.001). The WB group also showed a higher quality of life, as measured by the Barthel Index (54.5 ± 5.2 points vs. 64.3 ± 4.0 points at 6 weeks and 71.0 ± 4.3 points vs. 80.7 ± 3.4 points at 2 years; p<0.001).

Conclusions

Elderly patients with pronation rotation type III fractures could benefit from an early weight-bearing protocol in terms of quality of life and functionality.

Anti-gravity treadmill rehabilitation improves gait and muscle atrophy in patients with surgically treated ankle and tibial plateau fractures after one year: A randomised clinical trial

OBJECTIVE

To compare the one-year postoperative outcomes of anti-gravity treadmill rehabilitation with those of standard rehabilitation in patients with ankle or tibial plateau fractures.

DESIGN

An open-label prospective randomised study.

SETTING

Three trauma centres.

SUBJECTS

Patients were randomised into the intervention (anti-gravity treadmill) or control (standard protocol) rehabilitation group.

MAIN MEASURES

The primary endpoint was changes in the Foot and Ankle Outcome Score for ankle fractures and Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score for tibial plateau fractures from baseline to 12 months after operation. Secondary endpoints were the subscores of these scores, muscle atrophy (leg circumference at 20 cm above and 10 cm below the knee joint) and the Dynamic Gait Index.

RESULTS

Initially, 73 patients (37 vs 36) underwent randomisation. After 12 months, 29 patients in the intervention group and 24 patients in the control group could be analysed. No significant difference was noted in the Foot and Ankle Outcome Score (80.8 ± 18.4 and 78.4 ± 21.1) and Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (84.8 ± 15.2 and 81.7 ± 17.0). The change in the Dynamic Gait Index from 12 weeks to 12 months differed significantly between the groups (P = 0.04). Patients with tibial plateau fractures had a 3 cm wider thigh circumference in the intervention group than those in the control group (95% confidence interval: -0.2 to 6.3 cm, P = 0.08).

CONCLUSION

One year after surgery, patients who had undergone anti-gravity treadmill rehabilitation showed better gait than patients in the control group, and those with tibial plateau fractures had less muscle atrophy.

Early Weightbearing Versus Nonweightbearing After Operative Treatment of an Ankle Fracture: A Multicenter, Noninferiority, Randomized Controlled Trial

BACKGROUND

Acute ankle fractures can occur during sports activities, and unstable ankle fractures are commonly treated operatively. However, controversy exists about the optimal time to allow weightbearing.

HYPOTHESIS

Early weightbearing after the stable fixation of an ankle fracture is not inferior to nonweightbearing in terms of ankle function assessed at 12 months after injury.

STUDY DESIGN

Randomized controlled trial; Level of evidence, 1.

METHODS

A total of 258 patients were assessed for eligibility. Of these patients, 194 were randomly allocated to either the early weightbearing group (95 patients who were allowed weightbearing at 2 weeks postoperatively) or the nonweightbearing group (99 patients who were not allowed weightbearing until 6 weeks postoperatively). The primary outcome measure was the mean difference in the Olerud-Molander ankle score (OMAS) between the groups, assessed at the 12-month follow-up examination. The secondary outcome measures were the time to return to preinjury activities and patients' subjective satisfaction. Complications such as hardware loosening or failure, fracture displacement, and nonunion were evaluated.

RESULTS

The mean difference in the OMAS for the early weightbearing group compared with the nonweightbearing group was 1.6 (95% CI, -1.9 to 5.0) in the intention-to-treat analysis. The lower limit of the 95% CI (-1.9) exceeded the noninferiority margin of -8, indicating that early weightbearing was not inferior to nonweightbearing. The difference in the proportion of patients who were satisfied or very satisfied with their treatment was not statistically significant (84.3% vs 76.2%; P = .19); however, the time taken to return to preinjury activities was shorter with early weightbearing than with nonweightbearing (9.1 ± 3.0 vs 11.0 ± 3.0 weeks; P < .001). No cases of nonunion were observed in either group.

CONCLUSION

Early weightbearing after the operative treatment of an unstable ankle fracture was not inferior to nonweightbearing in terms of OMAS assessed at 12 months after injury. The patients' subjective satisfaction was similar between the groups, although the time taken to return to preinjury activities was shorter in the early weightbearing group.

REGISTRATION

NCT02029170 (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier).

Effect of Early Weight Bearing on Outcomes After Open Reduction and Internal Fixation of Trimalleolar Ankle Fractures

Current practice allows early weight bearing of unstable ankle fractures after fixation. This study offers a unique comparison of early weight bearing (EWB) vs late weight bearing (LWB) in operatively stabilized trimalleolar ankle fractures. The goal of this study was to evaluate union rates, clinical outcomes, and complications for patients who were managed with EWB vs LWB. The authors performed a retrospective review of 185 patients who underwent surgical stabilization for trimalleolar ankle fracture. Fixation of the posterior malleolus and weight bearing status were determined by surgeon preference. For this study, EWB was defined as 3 weeks or less and LWB was defined as greater than 3 weeks. Patients were evaluated for fracture union and implant failure. Complications and clinical outcomes included ambulatory status, infection rate, and return to surgery. The EWB group included 47 (25.4%) patients, and the LWB group included 138 (74.6%) patients. Of the 7 nonunions, 1 (14.3%) occurred in the EWB group and 6 (85.7%) in the LWB group. A total of 72 (38.9%) posterior malleolar fractures were operatively stabilized, and stabilization did not affect union rates. Syndesmotic fixation was required for 12.5% of patients, despite posterior malleolar stabilization. Syndesmotic fixation increased the union rate 2.5 times. Deep infection and open fracture decreased union. No difference was seen between groups in implant failure, union rate, infection, or return to the operating room. No deleterious effect of EWB in operatively treated trimalleolar ankle fractures was found for union, implant failure, infection, or reoperation. Syndesmotic fixation may offer an advantage over posterior malleolar fixation, with improved union rates. [Orthopedics. 2021;44(3):160-165.].

Do levels of sedentary behaviour and physical activity differ according to weight-bearing status after lower limb fracture? A prospective cohort study

Background/purpose:

To determine whether sedentary behaviour and physical activity differ according to initial weight-bearing status 2 weeks and 6 months after lower limb (LL) fracture.

Methods:

Two weeks and 6 months following LL fracture, 47 adults aged 18–69 wore ActiGraph and activPAL accelerometers for 10 days. Sitting time, steps, and moderate-intensity physical activity (MPA) were compared between weight-bearing (WB) and non-weight-bearing (NWB) groups.

Results:

Two weeks post-discharge, the NWB group sat significantly more than the WB group (median: 14.1 h/day vs. 13.3 h/day; p = 0.04). These differences were apparent for female and middle-aged participants. At 6 months, there were no significant differences between weight-bearing groups for sitting time, steps or MPA.

Conclusion:

Weight-bearing restriction had an early impact on sitting time, but this impact lessened over time. While considering the need for rest, advice about reducing sitting time may be particularly important for people who are NWB post-fracture.

Immediate Weight-Bearing and Range of Motion After Internal Fixation of Selected Malleolar Fractures: A Retrospective Controlled Study

OBJECTIVES

We studied the safety of immediate weight-bearing as tolerated (IWBAT) and immediate range of motion (IROM) after open reduction internal fixation (ORIF) of selected malleolar ankle fractures (defined as involving bony or ligamentous disruption of 2 or more of the malleoli or syndesmosis without articular comminution) and attempted to identify risk factors for complications.

DESIGN

Retrospective case-control study.

SETTING

Level 1 Urban Trauma Center and multiple community hospitals, orthopedic specialty hospitals, and outpatient surgicenters within one metropolitan area.

PATIENTS/PARTICIPANTS

Of 268 patients at our level 1 trauma center who underwent primary ORIF of a selected malleolar fracture from 2013 to 2018, we identified 133 (49.6%) who were selected for IWBAT and IROM. We used propensity score matching to identify 172 controls who were non-weight-bearing (NWB) and no range of motion for 6 weeks postoperatively. The groups did not differ significantly in age, body mass index, Charleston Comorbidity Index, smoking status, diabetes status, malleoli involved, percentages undergoing medial malleolus (60.9% IWBAT vs. 51.7% NWB), posterior malleolus (24.1% IWBAT, 26.7% NWB), or syndesmosis fixation (41.4% IWBAT, 42.4% NWB, P = 0.85).

INTERVENTION

IWBAT and IROM after ankle ORIF versus NWB for 6 weeks.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS

Postoperative complications, including delayed wound healing, superficial or deep infection, and loss of reduction.

RESULTS

There was no significant difference in total complications (P = 0.41), nonoperative complications (P = 0.53), or operative complications, including a loss of reduction (P = 0.89). We did not identify any factors associated with an increased complication risk, including posterior malleolus or syndesmosis fixation, diabetes, age, or preinjury-assisted ambulation.

CONCLUSIONS

We failed to demonstrate a difference in complications in general and loss of reduction in particular when allowing immediate weight-bearing/ROM in selected cases of operatively treated malleolar fractures, suggesting this may be safe. Future prospective randomized studies are necessary to determine if immediate weight-bearing/ROM is safe and whether it offers any benefits to patients with operatively treated malleolar fractures.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Therapeutic Level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Is postoperative non-weight-bearing necessary? INWN Study protocol for a pragmatic randomised multicentre trial of operatively treated ankle fracture

BACKGROUND

Postoperative management regimes vary following open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) of unstable ankle fractures. There is an evolving understanding that extended periods of immobilisation and weight-bearing limitation may lead to poorer clinical outcomes. Traditional non-weight-bearing cast immobilisation may prevent loss of fixation, and this practice continues in many centres. The purpose of this trial is to investigate the safety and efficacy of immediate weight-bearing (IWB) and range of motion (ROM) exercise regimes following ORIF of unstable ankle fractures with a particular focus on functional outcomes and complication rates.

METHODS

A pragmatic randomised controlled multicentre trial, comparing IWB in a walking boot and ROM within 24 h versus non-weight-bearing (NWB) and immobilisation in a cast for 6 weeks, following ORIF of all types of unstable adult ankle fractures (lateral malleolar, bimalleolar, trimalleolar with or without syndesmotic injury) is proposed. All patients presenting to three trauma units will be included. The exclusion criteria will be skeletal immaturity and tibial plafond fractures. The three institutional review boards have granted ethical approval. The primary outcome measure will be the functional Olerud-Molander Ankle Score (OMAS). Secondary outcomes include wound infection (deep and superficial), displacement of osteosynthesis, the full arc of ankle motion (plantar flexion and dorsal flection), RAND-36 Item Short Form Survey (SF-36) scoring, time to return to work and postoperative hospital length of stay. The trial will be reported in accordance with the CONSORT statement for reporting a pragmatic trial, and this protocol will follow the SPIRIT guidance.

DISCUSSION

Traditional management of operatively treated ankle fractures includes an extended period of non-weight-bearing. There is emerging evidence that earlier weight-bearing may have equivocal outcomes and favourable patient satisfaction but higher wound-related complications. These studies often preclude more complicated fracture patterns or patient-related factors. To our knowledge, immediate weight-bearing (IWB) following ORIF of all types of unstable ankle fractures has not been investigated in a controlled prospective manner in recent decades. This pragmatic randomised-controlled multicentre trial will investigate immediate weight-bearing following ORIF of all ankle fracture patterns in the usual care condition. It is hoped that these results will contribute to the modern management of ankle fractures.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ISRCTN Registry ISRCTN76410775 . Retrospectively registered on 30 June 2019.

Potential Benefits of Limited Clinical and Radiographic Follow-up After Surgical Treatment of Ankle Fractures

Ankle fractures are one of the most prevalent musculoskeletal injuries, with a significant number requiring surgical treatment. Postoperative complications requiring additional interventions frequently occur during the early postoperative period. We hypothesize that there is a limited need for routine clinical and radiographic follow-up once the fracture is deemed healed.

Principles and guidelines in the management of ankle fractures in adults

Ankle fractures are common injuries that have many physical and psychosocial complications. As a result, it is important to be aware of how these patients present and are managed perioperatively. Detailed guidelines from NICE and the British Orthopaedic Association have been produced on this topic, including recent developments such as the decision to weight-bear early after surgery and the use of virtual fracture clinics. This article provides an overview of the key perioperative factors that need to be considered in cases of ankle fracture and the relevant clinical guidelines.

Early functional treatment or trivialization? - current treatment strategies in lateral ligament injuries of the ankle

Introduction: Ankle injuries are common in daily orthopaedic trauma practice, with a high incidence of lateral ligament complex (lat-lig-com) injuries of the ankle joint (AJ). Primarily, these lat-lig-com injuries heal sufficiently, although there is a risk of developing chronic ankle instability. However, there is a lack of knowledge about the clinical application and routine for rehabilitation strategies so as to prevent chronic instability. This study investigates the current rehabilitation concepts in clinical routine after ligament injuries of the AJ. Methods: Rehabilitation protocols, provided by orthopaedic and trauma surgery institutions in German speaking countries, were analysed in terms of weight-bearing, range of motion (ROM), physiotherapy and choice of orthosis. All protocols for operatively and non-operatively (nop) treated ligament ruptures of the AJ were included. Results: 120 of 213 institutions provided protocols of lat-lig-com injuries of the AJ. Regarding the orthosis, the nop-treatment group mainly used ankle braces; in contrast, the operative group preferred the use of an ankle boot. The operative group recommends 6-12 weeks for duration of orthosis in contrast to only 6 weeks in the nop group. Significant differences prevail in ROM, with free ROM in non-operative treatment from the first day after trauma (p<0.001) in contrast to a careful increase in ROM in the first 6 weeks post-operatively. Conclusion: Early functional treatment is clinical standard in rehabilitation after lat-lig-com injuries of the ankle. Regarding current literature the differences of restrictions in ROM and orthosis treatment after lat-lig-com injuries suggest a trivialization of conservative treatment in the first period after trauma compared to post-operative aftercare.

Ankle fractures in the elderly: Current concepts

Ankle fractures remain the third most common musculoskeletal injury in the elderly population. The presence of osteoporosis, significant multiple comorbidities and limited functional independence makes treatment of such injuries challenging. Early studies highlighted high rates of post-operative complications and poor outcomes after surgical intervention. With advances in surgical techniques and a greater understanding of multi-disciplinary team (MDT)-driven peri-operative care and rehabilitation, evidence now appears to suggest improved outcomes for operative management. Approaches must be adapted according to co-morbidities, baseline function and patient wishes. This review article aims to discuss contemporary treatment strategies and the complex challenges associated with the management of the elderly ankle fracture.