Short and long-term effects of telaprevir on kidney function in patients with hepatitis C virus infection: a retrospective cohort study

Treatment of chronic hepatitis C in patients with chronic kidney disease with Sofosbuvir-basead regimes

Background

To analyze the effectiveness and the safety of Sofosbuvir-based regimens to treat patients with chronic hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection and chronic kidney disease (CKD).

Methods

A retrospective, observational study in patients with chronic HCV infection and CKD treated with Sofosbuvir-based regimens was performed. Liver fibrosis, comorbidities, HCV genotype and sustained virological resposnse (SVR) at 12th week post-treatment were evaluated. Kidney function was accessed by serum creatinine and glomerular filtration rate (GFR). The assumed level of significance was 5 %.

Results

Thirty-five patients were treated. The mean age was 52.1 ± 10.9 years, 19 (54.3 %) were women, 32 (91.4 %) were already kidney transplanted and 3 (8.6 %) were on hemodialysis. The SVR by intention to treat was 88.6 %. The mean GFR was 65.8 ± 28.6 and 63.7 ± 28.3 ml/min pre- and post-treatment respectively (p > 0.05). Treatment was interrupted in 1 (2.85 %) patient due to anemia and in 2 (5.7 %) due to loss of kidney function.

Conclusion

Sofosbuvir-based regimens are effective to treat HCV in patients with CKD. In patients with mild CKD this type of therapy seems to be safe.

Effect of Sofosbuvir-Based Hepatitis C Virus Therapy on Kidney Function in Patients with CKD

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

Hepatitis C virus infection is common in patients with CKD and leads to accelerated progression to ESRD. Sofosbuvir is a potent direct-acting antiviral therapy against hepatitis C virus; however, there are concerns about its safety in patients with CKD. The objective of our study was to determine the safety and efficacy of sofosbuvir in patients with CKD.

DESIGN, SETTING, PARTICIPANTS, & MEASUREMENTS

We studied a retrospective observational cohort of patients with CKD defined by eGFR<60 ml/min per 1.73 m2, ≥30 mg albuminuria per 1 g creatinine, or ≥200 mg proteinuria per 1 g creatinine who received sofosbuvir-based therapy in a large health care system. Regression models were constructed to predict likelihood of sustained virologic response, detect adverse events, and examine changes in eGFR from baseline to follow-up.

RESULTS

Ninety-eight patients with CKD (42% stage 1 or 2 CKD and 58% stage 3 CKD) were included. Mean age was 62 years old, 78% were men, and 65% were white. Additionally, 49% of patients had diabetes, 38% of patients had cirrhosis, and 33% of patients had prior solid organ transplant. Overall sustained virologic response was 81% and varied by regimen used and viral genotype. Average baseline eGFR was equivalent to average on-treatment eGFR, but seven patients experienced a rise in creatinine ≥1.5 times baseline while taking sofosbuvir; all but one recovered. In patients with eGFR<60 ml/min per 1.73 m2 at baseline (stage 3 CKD), regression models showed that hepatitis C cure was associated with a 9.3 (95% confidence interval, 0.44 to 18) ml/min per 1.73 m2 improvement in eGFR during the 6-month post-treatment follow-up period. Adverse events were common (81%), but serious adverse events (17%) and treatment discontinuations (8%) were uncommon.

CONCLUSIONS

Sofosbuvir-based direct-acting antiviral therapy is safe and effective in a cohort of patients with CKD infected with hepatitis C.

Interferon-free regimens in patients with hepatitis C infection and renal dysfunction or kidney transplantation

Treatment of patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) and chronic hepatitis C (CHC) differs from that used in the general CHC population mostly when glomerular filtration rate (GFR) is below 30 mL/min, as sofosbuvir, the backbone of several current regimens, is officially contraindicated. Given that ribavirin free regimens are preferable in CKD, elbasvir/grazoprevir is offered in CHC patients with genotype 1 or 4 and ombitasvir/paritaprevir and dasabuvir in genotype 1b for 12 wk. Although regimens containing peginterferon with or without ribavirin are officially recommended for patients with CKD and genotype 2, 3, 5, 6, such regimens are rarely used because of their low efficacy and the poor safety and tolerance profile. In this setting, especially in the presence of advanced liver disease, sofosbuvir-based regimens are often used, despite sofosbuvir contraindication. It seems to have good overall safety with only 6% or 3.4% of CKD patients to discontinue therapy or develop serious adverse events without drug discontinuation. In addition, sustained virological response (SVR) rates with sofosbuvir based regimens in CKD patients appear to be comparable with SVR rates in patients with normal renal function. Treatment recommendations for kidney transplant recipients are the same with those for patients with CHC, taking into consideration potential drug-drug interactions and baseline GFR before treatment initiation. This review summarizes recent data on the current management of CHC in CKD patients highlighting their strengths and weaknesses and determining their usefulness in clinical practice.

Telaprevir-Induced Renal Adverse Events in Japanese Patients Reported in the PMDA Adverse Drug Reactions Reporting Database

BACKGROUND

Telaprevir is a protease inhibitor currently used in the treatment of chronic hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection. One of its adverse effects is renal impairment. The Pharmaceutical and Medical Device Agency (PMDA) in Japan reported on telaprevir-related renal dysfunction in 2012. In this study, renal adverse events of telaprevir were investigated using the Japanese Adverse Drug Event Report database. Patient profiles with adverse events might provide useful information for HCV therapy.

METHODS

We screened the case reports in Japanese Adverse Drug Event Report database (JADER) of the PMDA. The profiles of patients with renal adverse events were analyzed.

RESULTS

The present results showed that reports of renal adverse events were most common in male patients between 60 and 69 years of age. Significant factors that affect the clinical outcomes of renal adverse events were not detected. However, it was suggested that anorexia is associated with renal adverse events.

CONCLUSIONS

The number of reports of renal adverse events were highest in male patients 60 to 69 years of age treated with telaprevir. In addition, our findings suggested that anorexia is correlated with renal adverse events after telaprevir treatment. Further investigation is required to clarify the mechanism of renal impairments during triple therapy. Such knowledge might improve the safety of telaprevir therapy.