Predictive and Prognostic Value of Ribonucleotide Reductase Regulatory Subunit M1 and Excision Repair Cross-Complementation Group 1 in Advanced Urothelial Carcinoma (UC) Treated with First-Line Gemcitabine Plus Platinum Combination Chemotherapy

Prognostic value of nucleotide excision repair and translesion DNA synthesis proteins in muscle-infiltrating bladder carcinoma

BACKGROUND

Cisplatin (CDDP) remains a key agent in the treatment of muscle-infiltrating bladder carcinoma (MIBC). However, a proportion of MIBC patients do not respond to chemotherapy, which may be caused by the increased repair of CDDP-induced DNA damage. The purpose of this study was to explore the prognostic value of proteins involved in nucleotide excision repair (NER) and translesion DNA synthesis (TLS) in MIBC patients.

METHODS

This is a retrospective analysis of 86 MIBC patients. The XPA, XPF, XPG, ERCC1, POLI, POLH and REV3L proteins were stained in primary bladder tumors and their levels were analyzed both in the total cohort and in a subgroup with metastatic urothelial carcinoma (mUC) that received gemcitabine and CDDP as a first-line therapy. Both cohorts were divided by percentage of cancer cells stained positive for each protein into subgroups with high and low expression. In the same manner, the combined expression of NER (XPA + ERCC1 + XPF + XPG) and TLS (POLI + POLH + REV3L), as the whole pathways, was analyzed.

RESULTS

Mortality was 89.5% at the median follow-up of 120.2 months. In the total cohort, patients with tumors stained positive for XPA, XPG and POLI had significantly worse overall survival (OS) compared to those with negative staining [hazard ratio (HR) = 0.60, 0.62 and 0.53, respectively]. Both XPG and POLI were independent prognostic factors in multivariate analyses (MVA). In addition, an increase in NER and TLS pathway expression was significantly associated with worse OS in the total cohort (HR = 0.54 and 0.60, respectively). In the mUC subgroup, high POLI expression was associated with significant deterioration of OS (HR = 0.56) in univariate analyses, and its independent prognostic value was shown in MVA.

CONCLUSIONS

Our study showed significant correlations between the tumor expression of XPG and POLI, as well as NER and TLS as the whole pathways, and inferior OS. Hence, they could constitute prognostic biomarkers and potentially promising therapeutic targets in MIBC. However, a prospective trial is required for further validation, thereby overcoming the limitations of this study.

Knockdown of RRM1 with Adenoviral shRNA Vectors to Inhibit Tumor Cell Viability and Increase Chemotherapeutic Sensitivity to Gemcitabine in Bladder Cancer Cells

RRM1-an important DNA replication/repair enzyme-is the primary molecular gemcitabine (GEM) target. High RRM1-expression associates with gemcitabine-resistance in various cancers and RRM1 inhibition may provide novel cancer treatment approaches. Our study elucidates how RRM1 inhibition affects cancer cell proliferation and influences gemcitabine-resistant bladder cancer cells. Of nine bladder cancer cell lines investigated, two RRM1 highly expressed cells, 253J and RT112, were selected for further experimentation. An RRM1-targeting shRNA was cloned into adenoviral vector, Ad-shRRM1. Gene and protein expression were investigated using real-time PCR and western blotting. Cell proliferation rate and chemotherapeutic sensitivity to GEM were assessed by MTT assay. A human tumor xenograft model was prepared by implanting RRM1 highly expressed tumors, derived from RT112 cells, in nude mice. Infection with Ad-shRRM1 effectively downregulated RRM1 expression, significantly inhibiting cell growth in both RRM1 highly expressed tumor cells. In vivo, Ad-shRRM1 treatment had pronounced antitumor effects against RRM1 highly expressed tumor xenografts (p < 0.05). Moreover, combination of Ad-shRRM1 and GEM inhibited cell proliferation in both cell lines significantly more than either treatment individually. Cancer gene therapy using anti-RRM1 shRNA has pronounced antitumor effects against RRM1 highly expressed tumors, and RRM1 inhibition specifically increases bladder cancer cell GEM-sensitivity. Ad-shRRM1/GEM combination therapy may offer new treatment options for patients with GEM-resistant bladder tumors.

Clinical Perspectives of ERCC1 in Bladder Cancer

ERCC1 is a key regulator of nucleotide excision repair (NER) pathway that repairs bulky DNA adducts, including intrastrand DNA adducts and interstrand crosslinks (ICLs). Overexpression of ERCC1 has been linked to increased DNA repair capacity and platinum resistance in solid tumors. Multiple single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) have been detected in ERCC1 gene that may affect ERCC1 protein expression. Platinum-based treatment remains the cornerstone of urothelial cancer treatment. Given the expanding application of neoadjuvant and adjuvant chemotherapy in locally advanced bladder cancer, there is an emerging need for biomarkers that could distinguish potential responders to cisplatin treatment. Extensive research has been done regarding the prognostic and predictive role of ERCC1 gene expression and polymorphisms in bladder cancer. Moreover, novel compounds have been recently developed to target ERCC1 protein function in order to maximize sensitivity to cisplatin. We aim to review all the existing literature regarding the role of the ERCC1 gene in bladder cancer and address future perspectives for its clinical application.

RRM1 predicts clinical outcome of high-and intermediate-risk non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer patients treated with intravesical gemcitabine monotherapy

Background

The expression level of ribonucleotide reductase subunit M1 (RRM1) is closely related to the effect of gemcitabine-based therapy in advanced bladder cancer. However, the value of RRM1 expression in predicting progression-free survival in non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC) patients treated with intravesical gemcitabine chemotherapy has not been elucidated.

Methods

This study randomly assigned 162 patients to either the RRM1-known group or the unknown group. We collected cancer tissues from 81 patients to evaluate the mRNA expression of RRM1 by using liquid chip technology. All patients were diagnosed and then treated with intravesical gemcitabine monotherapy immediately after transurethral resection of the bladder tumour (TURBT).

Results

RRM1 expression was high in 21% (17/81) of patients. The RRM1 mRNA level was not correlated with sex, age, weight, performance status, or CUA/EAU risk (p > 0.05). Progression-free survival (PFS) was significantly longer for patients with low RRM1 expression than for patients with high and unknown RRM1 expression (p = 0.009). Additionally, the 1- and 2-year relapse rates also differed according to RRM1 expression level. The 1-year relapse rates for RRM1-low, RRM1-high and RRM1-unknown patients were 0, 17.7 and 6.2% (p = 0.009), while the 2-year relapse rates for these groups were 3.1, 29.4, and 11.1% (p = 0.005), respectively.

Conclusions

This preliminary study showed that low RRM1 expression was associated with longer progression-free survival and lower 1-year/2-year relapse rates in NMIBC patients treated with intravesical gemcitabine monotherapy, despite the need for further verification with large sample sizes and considering more mixed factors and biases.

Clinical research of individualized therapy in advanced esophageal cancer based on the ERCC1 C8092A genotype

The present study aimed to explore the role and clinical value of the detection of Excision repair cross-complementing 1(ERCC1) C8092A polymorphisms in individualized therapy of patients with advanced esophageal cancer. A total of 127 patients with advanced esophageal cancer were enrolled between January 2010 and January 2014 in Anhui Provincial Hospital. Patients were randomly assigned in a 1:2 ratio to a standard treatment group or an individualized treatment group, respectively, prior to ERCC1 C8092A assessment. Patients in the standard treatment group were treated with paclitaxel and cisplatin. The DNA was obtained from the peripheral blood of individualized treatment patients, amplified by PCR and sequenced to determine the ERCC1 C8092A polymorphism prior to the administration of chemotherapies. Patients with the ERCC1 C8092A genotype of A/A or A/C received paclitaxel and cisplatin, and those with the genotype of C/C received paclitaxel and fluorouracil. The primary endpoint was response rate (RR). The secondary endpoints included toxicity of chemotherapy, progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) times. Differences between the groups were evaluated by χ² test. Differences in survival were analyzed by Kaplan-Meier survival curves. The survival rate was analyzed by log-rank test. Follow-up data was obtained until December 2015. The RR was obtained for 15 patients (34.8%) in the standard treatment group and 45 patients (53.6%) in the individualized treatment group (χ²=3.095; P=0.046). For adverse events, nausea and vomiting and anemia were significantly decreased in the individualized treatment group compared with the standard treatment group (P=0.001 and P=0.004, respectively). The median progression free survival time was 4.4 months [95% confidence interval (CI)3.8-5.0 months] in the standard treatment group and 6.6 months (95% CI, 5.8-7.4 months) in the individualized treatment group (P=0.018). The median overall survival time was 11.4 months (95% CI, 10.1-12.7 months) in the standard treatment group and 14.2 months (95% CI, 13.2-15.2 months) in the individualized treatment group (P=0.008). The RR, toxicity of chemotherapy, PFS and OS were significantly improved in the individualized treatment group compared with the standard treatment group. Detection of ERCC1 gene polymorphisms maybe performed for patients with advanced esophageal cancer to improve individualized therapy, which requires additional study.

Nucleobase and Nucleoside Analogues: Resistance and Re-Sensitisation at the Level of Pharmacokinetics, Pharmacodynamics and Metabolism

Antimetabolites, in particular nucleobase and nucleoside analogues, are cytotoxic drugs that, starting from the small field of paediatric oncology, in combination with other chemotherapeutics, have revolutionised clinical oncology and transformed cancer into a curable disease. However, even though combination chemotherapy, together with radiation, surgery and immunotherapy, can nowadays cure almost all types of cancer, we still fail to achieve this for a substantial proportion of patients. The understanding of differences in metabolism, pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, and tumour biology between patients that can be cured and patients that cannot, builds the scientific basis for rational therapy improvements. Here, we summarise current knowledge of how tumour-specific and patient-specific factors can dictate resistance to nucleobase/nucleoside analogues, and which strategies of re-sensitisation exist. We revisit well-established hurdles to treatment efficacy, like the blood-brain barrier and reduced deoxycytidine kinase activity, but will also discuss the role of novel resistance factors, such as SAMHD1. A comprehensive appreciation of the complex mechanisms that underpin the failure of chemotherapy will hopefully inform future strategies of personalised medicine.

Overexpression of ribonucleotide reductase subunit M1 protein predicts shorter survival in metastatic bladder cancer patients treated with gemcitabine-containing combination chemotherapy

OBJECTIVES

To identify biomarkers predicting prognosis in bladder cancer patients undergoing the gemcitabine and cisplatin regimen.

METHODS

We studied 52 patients with metastatic bladder cancer treated with the gemcitabine and cisplatin regimen by evaluating the relationship between the expression of two biomarkers, ribonucleotide reductase subunit M1 and excision repair cross complementing 1, by immunohistochemistry and clinical outcomes.

RESULTS

The patients with low expression of ribonucleotide reductase subunit M1 showed a higher objective response rate by the gemcitabine and cisplatin regimen than those with high expression of ribonucleotide reductase subunit M1 (80.0% and 45.5%, respectively). No differences were observed according to the expression level of excision repair cross complementing 1. Low expression of ribonucleotide reductase subunit M1 significantly prolonged overall survival and progression-free survival compared with the high expression group. Low expression of excision repair cross complementing 1 tended to prolong overall survival and progression-free survival, but there were no significant differences (P = 0.07 and 0.10, respectively). Multivariate analysis showed that the expression of ribonucleotide reductase subunit M1 was the only independent prognostic factor (P = 0.012).

CONCLUSIONS

The expressions of ribonucleotide reductase subunit M1 seem to be associated with clinical response and survival in patients with metastatic bladder cancer treated with gemcitabine and cisplatin-based chemotherapy.

Platinum Concentration and Pathologic Response to Cisplatin-Based Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy in Muscle-Invasive Bladder Cancer

Background

Platinum (Pt)-based chemotherapy is the standard of care for muscle-invasive bladder cancer (MIBC). However, resistance is a major limitation. Reduced intratumoral drug accumulation is an important mechanism of platinum resistance. Our group previously demonstrated a significant correlation between tissue Pt concentration and tumor response to Pt-based neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) in lung cancer. We hypothesized that increased Pt concentration in radical cystectomy (RC) specimens would correlate with improved pathologic response to Pt-based NAC in MIBC.

Methods

A cohort of 19 clinically annotated, archived, fresh frozen RC specimens from patients with MIBC treated with Pt-based NAC was identified [ypT0 (pathologic complete response, pCR), N = 4; ≤ypT1N0M0 (pathologic partial response, pPR), N = 6; ≥ypT2 (minimal pathologic response/progression), N = 9)]. RC specimens from 2 patients with MIBC who did not receive NAC and 1 treated with a non-Pt containing NAC regimen were used as negative controls. Total Pt concentration in normal adjacent urothelial tissue and bladder tumors from RC specimens was measured by flameless atomic absorption spectrophotometry.

Results

Total Pt concentration in normal urothelium differed by tumor pathologic response (P = 0.011). Specimens with pCR had the highest Pt concentrations compared to those with pPR (P = 0.0095) or no response/progression (P = 0.020). There was no significant difference in Pt levels in normal urothelium and tumor between pPR and no response/progression groups (P = 0.37; P = 0.25, respectively). Conclusions: Our finding of increased intracellular Pt in RC specimens with pCR following NAC for MIBC compared to those with residual disease suggests that enhanced Pt accumulation may be an important determinant of Pt sensitivity. Factors that modulate intracellular Pt concentration, such as expression of Pt transporters, warrant further investigation as predictive biomarkers of response to Pt-based NAC in MIBC.