Immunohistochemistry and Fluorescence In Situ Hybridization Can Inform the Differential Diagnosis of Low-Grade Noninvasive Urothelial Carcinoma with an Inverted Growth Pattern and Inverted Urothelial Papilloma

RAS Family Gene Mutations, Clinicopathological Features, and Spread Patterns of Inverted Urothelial Papilloma of the Bladder

Inverted urothelial papilloma (IUP) is a benign neoplasm characterized by a downgrowth of the urothelium beneath the surface of morphologically normal urothelial cells; however, the molecular features of IUP and their association with clinicopathological characteristics are unclear. In this study, we aimed to investigate the mutational landscape, clinicopathological features, genotype-phenotype associations, and spread patterns of IUP. We performed targeted next-generation sequencing of 39 consecutive IUP cases, the largest series investigated to date, and identified oncogenic driver mutations in RAS family genes in 34 cases (87%). HRAS mutations were the most prevalent (28 cases), which included Q61R (15 cases), followed by KRAS (5 cases) and NRAS (1 case) mutations. Characteristic mutations observed in urothelial carcinoma, including those in FGFR3 , TP53 , or the TERT promoter, were absent. HRAS -mutated IUPs were associated with a history of smoking ( P = 0.017) and streaming morphology ( P < 0.001), corresponding to the trabecular subtype. In contrast, all KRAS -mutated IUPs occurred in never-smoking patients ( P = 0.001) and showed cystic changes in morphology ( P = 0.005), corresponding to the glandular subtype. RAS Q61R immunohistochemistry visually revealed the neoplastic nature of the overlying cells and distinct spread patterns of IUP cells within the surface, including pseudoinfiltrative spread. No recurrence or carcinoma development was observed in any of the IUP cases during the follow-up period. Thus, we confirmed the importance of RAS pathway activation in IUP pathogenesis, an association between RAS family gene mutations and IUP subtypes, and the spread patterns of IUP cells within the surface.

Clinicopathologic Features of Noninvasive Inverted Urothelial Papillary Tumor

OBJECTIVES

Clinicopathologic features and recurrence rates of inverted noninvasive urothelial papillary tumors have been poorly characterized to date with few larger studies evaluating long-term outcomes. The spectrum of histomorphology, clinical features, and prognosis of inverted lesions of the urinary bladder are retrospectively reviewed.

METHODS

Archived paraffin-embedded urothelial tumor samples from patients diagnosed with inverted urothelial papillary lesions between January 2005 and June 2020 were collated. A matched control population of patients with exophytic papillary lesions of the urothelium diagnosed during the same time period was randomly selected. The conventional clinicopathologic features of inverted urothelial papillary tumor were evaluated retrospectively and patient demographics, tumor characteristics, recurrence, and survival information were recorded.

RESULTS

Lower recurrence rates were observed for inverted papillary urothelial neoplasm of low malignant potential (IPUNLMP) relative to papillary urothelial neoplasms of low malignant potential and for low-grade papillary urothelial carcinoma with an inverted growth pattern (LG-PUCI) relative to low-grade papillary urothelial carcinomas. No recurrence was found among the inverted urothelial papilloma cases. The 2- and 5-year disease-free survival rates were 100.0% and 85.2% for IPUNLMP patients; 94.4% and 80.4% for papillary urothelial neoplasms of low malignant potential; 89.5% and 82.0% for LG-PUCI; 73.7% and 54.6% for low-grade papillary urothelial carcinoma; 40.0% and 20.0% for high-grade papillary urothelial carcinoma with an inverted growth pattern patients and 26.7% and 26.7% for high-grade papillary urothelial carcinoma. Multivariate Cox regression analysis of IPUNLMP and LG-PUCI/high-grade papillary urothelial carcinoma with an inverted growth pattern indicated that tumor number (hazard ratio=4.356; 95% CI: 1.145-16.570; P =0.031) was a powerful prognostic factor for disease-free survival.

CONCLUSION

Noninvasive, papillary urothelial lesions of the bladder tend to have lower recurrence and a better outcome if an inverted growth pattern is shown.

Proteomic-Based Machine Learning Analysis Reveals PYGB as a Novel Immunohistochemical Biomarker to Distinguish Inverted Urothelial Papilloma From Low-Grade Papillary Urothelial Carcinoma With Inverted Growth

Background

The molecular biology of inverted urothelial papilloma (IUP) as a precursor disease of urothelial carcinoma is poorly understood. Furthermore, the overlapping histology between IUP and papillary urothelial carcinoma (PUC) with inverted growth is a diagnostic pitfall leading to frequent misdiagnoses.

Methods

To identify the oncologic significance of IUP and discover a novel biomarker for its diagnosis, we employed mass spectrometry-based proteomic analysis of IUP, PUC, and normal urothelium (NU). Machine learning analysis shortlisted candidate proteins, while subsequent immunohistochemical validation was performed in an independent sample cohort.

Results

From the overall proteomic landscape, we found divergent ‘NU-like’ (low-risk) and ‘PUC-like’ (high-risk) signatures in IUP. The latter were characterized by altered metabolism, biosynthesis, and cell–cell interaction functions, indicating oncologic significance. Further machine learning-based analysis revealed SERPINH1, PKP2, and PYGB as potential diagnostic biomarkers discriminating IUP from PUC. The immunohistochemical validation confirmed PYGB as a specific biomarker to distinguish between IUP and PUC with inverted growth.

Conclusion

In conclusion, we suggest PYGB as a promising immunohistochemical marker for IUP diagnosis in routine practice.

Distinctive morphological and molecular features of urothelial carcinoma with an inverted growth pattern

Urothelial carcinoma with an inverted growth pattern (UC-IGP) is a peculiar entity within the spectrum of urothelial lesions. While efforts have been made over the last few decades to unravel its carcinogenesis and relationship with conventional urothelial carcinoma, the exact classification of inverted urothelial lesions is a matter of debate. The morphological features of UC-IGP pose several issues in differential diagnosis with other mostly benign lesions. Various techniques, including immunohistochemistry, UroVysion, and many molecular methods, have been employed to study the exact nature of this lesion. The aim of this review is to provide a comprehensive overview of the morphological and immunophenotypical aspects of UC-IGP. Moreover, we present and discuss the immunohistochemical and molecular markers involved in diagnosis and prognosis of UC-IGP lesions.

Auxiliary diagnostic value of p16 amplification combined with the detection of heterozygous and homozygous loss for urothelial carcinoma

The present study aimed to investigate the significance of detecting cyclin dependent kinase inhibitor 2A (p16) gene aberrations in the diagnosis of urothelial carcinoma (UC) using fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH). A total of 77 voided urine specimens from 65 patients with UC and 12 patients with benign urinary disease were recruited into the current study. Under a fluorescence microscope, cells with large and irregular nuclei were assessed for chromosomal aberrations. The positive rate of p16 amplification in UC samples was 32.3% (21/65), which was significantly higher than that in benign urinary disease samples (16.7%, 2/12; P<0.05). Heterozygous and homozygous loss of p16 was identified in 12 (18.5%) and 23 (35.4%) patients with UC, respectively; p16 expression in the remainder of patients was normal. In addition, as tumor stage or grade advanced, the positive rate of p16 aberrations also increased significantly (P<0.05). In conclusion, p16 gene aberrations may serve important roles in the auxiliary diagnosis of UC by FISH and could be utilized to monitor UC progression.

Inverted urothelial papilloma: A review of diagnostic pitfalls and clinical management

Inverted urothelial papilloma (IUP) is a rare, non-invasive endophytic lesion that accounts for 1-2% of urothelial tumours. On cystoscopy, IUP appears as a pedunculated/papillary mass with a smooth surface. On microscopy, IUP has an endophytic growth pattern with the bulk of the tumour covered by a superficial layer of urothelium, which can be hyperplastic or attenuated. The cytology should be bland, with uniform, spindled cells arranged in anastomosing trabeculae and cords with peripheral palisading of basaloid cells. Exophytic papillae and mitotic activity should be absent or focal. Pseudoglandular spaces and squamous metaplasia may also be present. There are distinct molecular differences between IUP and urothelial carcinoma (UC). IUP rarely has mutations of FGFR3, homozygous loss of 9p21, or gain of chromosomes 3, 7, and 17, whereas these mutations are frequently seen in UC. In addition, IUP is much less likely to have TERT mutations compared to UC. Immunohistochemistry can also be helpful in distinguishing the two entities as IUP is typically negative for CK20 and has a low Ki-67 proliferation index. Positivity for p53 may be seen in a minority of IUP. IUP can recur and be seen in association with UC. Distinguishing IUP from UC can be difficult due to the similarity between the two entities both on cystoscopy and histology, as up to 25% of UCs will also have inverted growth. Given the morphologic variants of IUP and UC, it is possible for a diagnostic error to occur, which can significantly impact patient management.