Screening of Non- Saccharomyces cerevisiae Strains for Tolerance to Formic Acid in Bioethanol Fermentation

Advanced Bioethanol Production: From Novel Raw Materials to Integrated Biorefineries

The production of so-called advanced bioethanol offers several advantages compared to traditional bioethanol production processes in terms of sustainability criteria. This includes, for instance, the use of nonfood crops or residual biomass as raw material and a higher potential for reducing greenhouse gas emissions. The present review focuses on the recent progress related to the production of advanced bioethanol, (i) highlighting current results from using novel biomass sources such as the organic fraction of municipal solid waste and certain industrial residues (e.g., residues from the paper, food, and beverage industries); (ii) describing new developments in pretreatment technologies for the fractionation and conversion of lignocellulosic biomass, such as the bioextrusion process or the use of novel ionic liquids; (iii) listing the use of new enzyme catalysts and microbial strains during saccharification and fermentation processes. Furthermore, the most promising biorefinery approaches that will contribute to the cost-competitiveness of advanced bioethanol production processes are also discussed, focusing on innovative technologies and applications that can contribute to achieve a more sustainable and effective utilization of all biomass fractions. Special attention is given to integrated strategies such as lignocellulose-based biorefineries for the simultaneous production of bioethanol and other high added value bioproducts.

The establishment of a marine focused biorefinery for bioethanol production using seawater and a novel marine yeast strain

Current technologies for bioethanol production rely on the use of freshwater for preparing the fermentation media and use yeasts of a terrestrial origin. Life cycle assessment has suggested that between 1,388 to 9,812 litres of freshwater are consumed for every litre of bioethanol produced. Hence, bioethanol is considered a product with a high-water footprint. This paper investigated the use of seawater-based media and a novel marine yeast strain ‘Saccharomyces cerevisiae AZ65’ to reduce the water footprint of bioethanol. Results revealed that S. cerevisiae AZ65 had a significantly higher osmotic tolerance when compared with the terrestrial reference strain. Using 15-L bioreactors, S. cerevisiae AZ65 produced 93.50 g/L ethanol with a yield of 83.33% (of the theoretical yield) and a maximum productivity of 2.49 g/L/h when using seawater-YPD media. This approach was successfully applied using an industrial fermentation substrate (sugarcane molasses). S. cerevisiae AZ65 produced 52.23 g/L ethanol using molasses media prepared in seawater with a yield of 73.80% (of the theoretical yield) and a maximum productivity of 1.43 g/L/h. These results demonstrated that seawater can substitute freshwater for bioethanol production without compromising production efficiency. Results also revealed that marine yeast is a potential candidate for use in the bioethanol industry especially when using seawater or high salt based fermentation media.

Genome-wide search for candidate genes for yeast robustness improvement against formic acid reveals novel susceptibility (Trk1 and positive regulators) and resistance (Haa1-regulon) determinants

BACKGROUND

Formic acid is an inhibitory compound present in lignocellulosic hydrolysates. Understanding the complex molecular mechanisms underlying Saccharomyces cerevisiae tolerance to this weak acid at the system level is instrumental to guide synthetic pathway engineering for robustness improvement of industrial strains envisaging their use in lignocellulosic biorefineries.

RESULTS

This study was performed to identify, at a genome-wide scale, genes whose expression confers protection or susceptibility to formic acid, based on the screening of a haploid deletion mutant collection to search for these phenotypes in the presence of 60, 70 and 80 mM of this acid, at pH 4.5. This chemogenomic analysis allowed the identification of 172 determinants of tolerance and 41 determinants of susceptibility to formic acid. Clustering of genes required for maximal tolerance to this weak acid, based on their biological function, indicates an enrichment of those involved in intracellular trafficking and protein synthesis, cell wall and cytoskeleton organization, carbohydrate metabolism, lipid, amino acid and vitamin metabolism, response to stress, chromatin remodelling, transcription and internal pH homeostasis. Among these genes is HAA1 encoding the main transcriptional regulator of yeast transcriptome reprograming in response to acetic acid and genes of the Haa1-regulon; all demonstrated determinants of acetic acid tolerance. Among the genes that when deleted lead to increased tolerance to formic acid, TRK1, encoding the high-affinity potassium transporter and a determinant of resistance to acetic acid, was surprisingly found. Consistently, genes encoding positive regulators of Trk1 activity were also identified as formic acid susceptibility determinants, while a negative regulator confers protection. At a saturating K⁺ concentration of 20 mM, the deletion mutant trk1Δ was found to exhibit a much higher tolerance compared with the parental strain. Given that trk1Δ accumulates lower levels of radiolabelled formic acid, compared to the parental strain, it is hypothesized that Trk1 facilitates formic acid uptake into the yeast cell.

CONCLUSIONS

The list of genes resulting from this study shows a few marked differences from the list of genes conferring protection to acetic acid and provides potentially valuable information to guide improvement programmes for the development of more robust strains against formic acid.