Evaluation of a 345 nm Femtosecond Laser for Corneal Surgery with Respect to Intraocular Radiation Hazard

Suitability of Slaughterhouse-Acquired Pig Eyes as Model Systems for Refractive Ultraviolet and Infrared Femtosecond Laser Research

PURPOSE

To elucidate whether it is feasible to use porcine eyes from scalded, abattoir-acquired animals for refractive femtosecond laser research.

METHODS

An infrared laser (FS 200) and an ultraviolet laser (prototype version) were tested for their applicability on scalded pig eyes. Fifty porcine eyes were divided into two equally-sized groups and assigned to either the infrared or the ultraviolet laser. Both laser groups were comprised of five subgroups of n = 5 eyes each. Group A: non-scalded eyes (negative control); group B: eyes taken from tunnel-scalded animals; group C1: eyes taken from tank-scalded animals without opaque corneal lesion; group C2: eyes taken from animals with opaque corneal lesion; group D: eyes scalded in toto in the laboratory (positive control). In each group the lasers were employed to create a stromal flap. The quality of the laser cuts and the resulting flap beds, as well as of the porcine corneas themselves, was examined by anterior segment optical coherence tomography and scanning electron microscopy.

RESULTS

All scalded specimens exhibited substantial corneal swelling, most pronounced in group C2. After ultraviolet laser application, the tank- and tunnel-scalded samples displayed marked irregularities and an increased degree of surface roughness in the flap beds. After infrared laser application, this was only the case in the tank-scalded specimens.

CONCLUSION

It is not recommended to use eyes taken from scalded pigs for ultraviolet femtosecond laser experiments. For infrared femtosecond lasers, eyes taken from tunnel-scalded animals may represent an acceptable alternative, if non-scalded eyes are not available.

Small incision lenticule extraction (SMILE) techniques: patient selection and perspectives

Refractive lenticule extraction is becoming the procedure of choice for the management of myopia and myopic astigmatism owing to its precision, biomechanical stability, and better ocular surface. It has similar safety, efficacy, and predictability as femtosecond laser-assisted in situ keratomileusis (FS-LASIK) and is associated with better patient satisfaction. The conventional technique of small incision lenticule extraction (SMILE) involves docking, femtosecond laser application, lenticule dissection from the surrounding stroma, and extraction. It has a steep learning curve compared to conventional flap-based corneal ablative procedures, and the surgical technique may be challenging especially for a novice surgeon. As SMILE is gaining worldwide acceptance among refractive surgeons, different modifications of the surgical technique have been described to ease the process of lenticule extraction and minimize complications. Good patient selection is essential to ensure optimal patient satisfaction, and novice surgeons should avoid cases with low myopia (thin refractive lenticules), difficult orbital anatomy, high astigmatism, or uncooperative, anxious patients to minimize complications. A comprehensive MEDLINE search was performed using “small incision lenticule extraction,” “SMILE,” and “refractive lenticule extraction” as keywords, and we herein review the patient selection for SMILE and various surgical techniques of SMILE with their pros and cons. With increasing surgeon experience, a standard technique is expected to evolve that may be performed in all types of cases with optimal outcomes and minimal adverse effects.