Efficacy of Steroid Pulse Therapy for Autoimmune Pancreatitis Type 1: A Retrospective Study

Autoimmune pancreatitis: Cornerstones and future perspectives

Autoimmune pancreatitis (AIP) is an autoimmune subtype of chronic pancreatitis resulting from the aberrant immune response against the pancreas, leading to inflammation and fibrosis. Although AIP is rare, its incidence is increasing and is often misdiagnosed as other pancreatic diseases. AIP is commonly classified into two types. Type 1 AIP (AIP-1) is typically associated with elevated serum immunoglobulin G4 (IgG4) levels and systemic manifestations, while type 2 AIP is typically a more localized form of the disease, and may coexist with other autoimmune disorders, especially inflammatory bowel diseases. Additionally, there is emerging recognition of a third type (type 3 AIP), which refers to immunotherapy-triggered AIP, although this classification is still gaining acceptance in medical literature. The clinical manifestations of AIP mainly include painless jaundice and weight loss. Elevated serum IgG4 levels are particularly characteristic of AIP-1. Diagnosis relies on a combination of clinical, laboratory, radiological, and histological findings, given the similarity of AIP symptoms to other pancreatic disorders. The mainstay of treatment for AIP is steroid therapy, which is effective in most cases. Severe cases might require additional imm-unosuppressive agents. This review aims to summarize the current knowledge of AIP, encompassing its epidemiology, etiology, clinical presentation, diagnosis, and treatment options. We also address the challenges and controversies in diagnosing and treating AIP, such as distinguishing it from pancreatic cancer and managing long-term treatment, highlighting the need for increased awareness and knowledge of this complex disease.

Long-term Outcomes after Steroid Pulse Therapy in Patients with Type 1 Autoimmune Pancreatitis

Objective Steroid pulse therapy is a regimen involving the intravenous administration of supra-pharmacological doses of corticosteroids in the short term. It is used to treat various inflammatory and autoimmune conditions. However, the strengths and limitations of steroid pulse therapy for induction of remission in type 1 autoimmune pancreatitis (AIP) are unknown. Methods Depending on the steroid therapy regimen administered, the 104 patients with type 1 AIP included in this retrospective study were divided into three groups: conventional oral prednisolone (PSL) regimen (PSL group), intravenous methylprednisolone (IVMP) pulse followed by oral PSL regimen (Pulse+PSL group), and IVMP pulse-alone regimen (Pulse-alone group). We then examined the relapse rate and adverse events among the three groups. Results The Kaplan-Meier estimates of the relapse rate at 36 months after steroid therapy were 13.6% in the PSL group, 13.3% in the Pulse+PSL group, and 46.2% in the Pulse-alone group. The log-rank test revealed that the relapse-free survival in the Pulse-alone group was significantly shorter than that in the PSL (p=0.024) and Pulse+PSL groups (p=0.014). The exacerbation of glucose tolerance after steroid therapy was less frequently observed in the Pulse-alone group (0%) than in the PSL group (17%, p=0.050) and Pulse+PSL groups (26%, p=0.011). Conclusion Although treatment with IVMP pulse alone resulted in unsatisfactory relapse prevention outcomes compared with conventional steroid therapy, the IVMP pulse-alone regimen might be an alternative treatment strategy for type 1 AIP from the perspective of avoiding adverse events from steroids.

The Clinical Utility of Soluble Serum Biomarkers in Autoimmune Pancreatitis: A Systematic Review

Autoimmune pancreatitis (AIP) is a rare etiological type of chronic pancreatitis. The clinical and radiological presentation of AIP often resembles that of pancreatic cancer. Identifying non-invasive markers for their early distinction is of utmost importance to avoid unnecessary surgery or a delay in steroid therapy. Thus, this systematic review was conducted to revisit all current evidence on the clinical utility of different serum biomarkers in diagnosing AIP, distinguishing AIP from pancreatic cancer, and predicting disease course, steroid therapy response, and relapse. A systematic review was performed for articles published up to August 2021 by searching electronic databases such as MEDLINE, Web of Science, and EMBASE. Among 5123 identified records, 92 studies were included in the qualitative synthesis. Apart from immunoglobulin (Ig) G4, which was by far the most studied biomarker, we identified autoantibodies against the following: lactoferrin, carboanhydrase II, plasminogen-binding protein, amylase-α2A, cationic (PRSS1) and anionic (PRSS2) trypsinogens, pancreatic secretory trypsin inhibitor (PSTI/SPINK1), and type IV collagen. The identified novel autoantigens were laminin 511, annexin A11, HSP-10, and prohibitin. Other biomarkers included cytokines, decreased complement levels, circulating immune complexes, N-glycan profile changes, aberrant miRNAs expression, decreased IgA and IgM levels, increased IgE levels and/or peripheral eosinophil count, and changes in apolipoprotein isoforms levels. To our knowledge, this is the first systematic review that addresses biomarkers in AIP. Evolving research has recognized numerous biomarkers that could help elucidate the pathophysiological mechanisms of AIP, bringing us closer to AIP diagnosis and its preoperative distinction from pancreatic cancer.

Advances in the diagnosis and management of IgG4 related disease

IgG4 related disease was recognized as a unified disease entity only 15 years ago. Awareness of IgG4 related disease has increased worldwide since then, and specialists are now familiar with most of its clinical manifestations. Involvement of the pancreato-biliary tract, retroperitoneum/aorta, head and neck, and salivary glands are the most frequently observed disease phenotypes, differing in epidemiological features, serological findings, and prognostic outcomes. In view of this multifaceted presentation, IgG4 related disease represents a great mimicker of many neoplastic, inflammatory, and infectious conditions. Histopathology remains key to diagnosis because reliable biomarkers are lacking. Recently released classification criteria will be invaluable in improving early recognition of the disease. IgG4 related disease is highly treatable and responds promptly to glucocorticoids, but it can lead to end stage organ failure and even death if unrecognized. Prolonged courses of corticosteroids are often needed to maintain remission because the disease relapses in most patients. Rapid advancement in our understanding of the pathophysiology of IgG4 related disease is leading to the identification of novel therapeutic targets and possible personalized approaches to treatment.

Steroid Therapy and Steroid Response in Autoimmune Pancreatitis

Autoimmune pancreatitis (AIP), a unique subtype of pancreatitis, is often accompanied by systemic inflammatory disorders. AIP is classified into two distinct subtypes on the basis of the histological subtype: immunoglobulin G4 (IgG4)-related lymphoplasmacytic sclerosing pancreatitis (type 1) and idiopathic duct-centric pancreatitis (type 2). Type 1 AIP is often accompanied by systemic lesions, biliary strictures, hepatic inflammatory pseudotumors, interstitial pneumonia and nephritis, dacryoadenitis, and sialadenitis. Type 2 AIP is associated with inflammatory bowel diseases in approximately 30% of cases. Standard therapy for AIP is oral corticosteroid administration. Steroid treatment is generally indicated for symptomatic cases and is exceptionally applied for cases with diagnostic difficulty (diagnostic steroid trial) after a negative workup for malignancy. More than 90% of patients respond to steroid treatment within 1 month, and most within 2 weeks. The steroid response can be confirmed on clinical images (computed tomography, ultrasonography, endoscopic ultrasonography, magnetic resonance imaging, and 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose-positron emission tomography). Hence, the steroid response is included as an optional diagnostic item of AIP. Steroid treatment results in normalization of serological markers, including IgG4. Short- and long-term corticosteroid treatment may induce adverse events, including chronic glycometabolism, obesity, an immunocompromised status against infection, cataracts, glaucoma, osteoporosis, and myopathy. AIP is common in old age and is often associated with diabetes mellitus (33-78%). Thus, there is an argument for corticosteroid therapy in diabetes patients with no symptoms. With low-dose steroid treatment or treatment withdrawal, there is a high incidence of AIP recurrence (24-52%). Therefore, there is a need for long-term steroid maintenance therapy and/or steroid-sparing agents (immunomodulators and rituximab). Corticosteroids play a critical role in the diagnosis and treatment of AIP.

Progressive Renal Dysfunction due to IgG4-Related Kidney Disease Refractory to Steroid Therapy: A Case Report

Recently, as the number of case reports of IgG4-related kidney disease (IgG4-RKD) has increased, the histopathological features and clinical approach have been clarified. IgG4-RKD generally has a benign prognosis due to the efficacy of steroid therapy and rarely requires dialysis. Herein, we report a case of IgG4-RKD that presented with a subacute onset, advanced to end-stage kidney disease, and finally required maintenance hemodialysis despite steroid therapy. A 75-year-old man was admitted to our hospital for further evaluation of subacute renal failure. Diffuse enlargement of the kidney on computed tomography and increased urinary N-acetyl-β-D-glucosaminidase and α1-microglobulin levels led us to suspect IgG4-RKD. Upon admission, the laboratory serological findings were as follows: creatinine 3.3 mg/dL, urea nitrogen 46.9 mg/dL, and IgG4 235 mg/dL. Urinalysis showed slight proteinuria without hematuria. Percutaneous renal needle biopsy showed diffuse infiltration of abundant lymphocytes and IgG4-positive plasma cells and storiform fibrosis, which is specific to IgG4-RKD, in the interstitium on light microscopy. Slight linear deposition of C3 was also observed in the tubules on immunofluorescence microscopy, with no electron-dense deposits. He was definitively diagnosed as having IgG4-RKD and started on prednisolone 0.6 mg/kg/day. However, the renal insufficiency continued to progress and hemodialysis was necessary. As the prednisolone was tapered, renal function did not improve and maintenance hemodialysis was started. In conclusion, this case indicates that the prognosis of IgG4-RKD is not necessarily benign and that further studies involving more patients are needed.

Dramatic decreases of all haemorrhagic coagulation factors by acquired inhibitors after extended left lobectomy

•

Required inhibitors of all coagulation factors.

•

After liver resection.

•

Severe bleeding.

•

Benefits of using steroid.

Introduction

Acquired inhibition of coagulation factors is a rare disease, and the diagnosis is often difficult and delayed. We experienced a deficiency in all coagulation factors after hepatobiliary surgery.

Case Presentation

Extended left liver resection was undertaken and hepaticojejunostomy was performed in a 70-year-old man. He had suffered from a high fever caused by cholangitis for 35 days. The major cause was a narrowing of the hepaticojejunostomy, and reconstruction was carried out. Twenty-four days later, there was a sudden massive bleed from his nose and the surgical site. Steroid pulse therapy was used as a treatment because cross mixing and some blood tests revealed the patient was experiencing an inhibition of all coagulation factors, and consequently the levels of coagulation factors dramatically recovered.

Discussion

We considered malignancy and surgical damages to be the underlying cause. The reported treatment and examination will help clinicians explore additional reasons for massive bleeding after a severe physical injury.

Conclusion

We have described the first case of acquired inhibition of all coagulation factors associated with extended left lobectomy.

Comparison of clinical characteristics of radiological forms of autoimmune pancreatitis

BACKGROUND

There is limited understanding of the clinical characteristics of different radiological forms of autoimmune pancreatitis (AIP). This retrospective study compared the clinical features of radiological forms of AIP.

METHODS

A retrospective review was conducted of patients with AIP treated from 2005 to 2015. Based on radiological features, these AIP cases were classified as diffuse (D) or focal (F), and the latter further stratified as head (H), or body and/or tail (B/T). The clinical characteristics and laboratory indices were compared.

RESULTS

Among the 119 patients, 66 (55.5%), 40 (33.6%), and 13 (10.9%) were respectively classified as D-, H-, and B/T-type. Compared with the others, the B/T-type patients were younger at onset, the percentage of men was lower, loss of appetite and weight were less common, and these patients had fewer extrapancreatic lesions (P < 0.05, each). Compared with the other groups, the B/T-type patients showed significantly lower levels of liver enzymes, direct bilirubin, and total bilirubin. No B/T-type patient displayed jaundice or pruritus. Three B/T-type patients progressed to D-type during the natural course of illness.

CONCLUSIONS

D-type and H-type AIP patients had similar clinical features. The B/T-type group differed significantly from the other two types. B/T-type can progress to D-type.

Management of Autoimmune Pancreatitis

Type 1 autoimmune pancreatitis (AIP) is an IgG-4-related systemic disease that can manifest as a pancreatic disorder or another disorder of presumed autoimmune origin. Type 2 disease is typically characterized by absent IgG-4-positive cells. As patients often present with acute pancreatitis, obstructive jaundice, or pancreatic mass, it is imperative to exclude malignancy, a more common diagnosis. AIP may respond to corticosteroids, and has a strong association with other immune-mediated diseases. Recent literature suggests the benefit of immune-modulating therapy, including rituximab, although no consensus exists. This review covers the essentials of diagnosis, but focuses primarily on management of AIP.

Outcome and Genetic Factors in IgG4-Associated Autoimmune Pancreatitis and Cholangitis: A Single Center Experience

Introduction. Most investigations on autoimmune pancreatitis (AIP) were published on Asian cohorts while those on Caucasians are limited. However, there might be differences related to the origin. Patients and Methods. We analyzed 36 patients and compared type 1 (AIP1) with type 2 (AIP2). Results. The majority of patients suffered from AIP1 (55.6%). AIP1 patients were significantly older than AIP2 patients (54.4 versus 40.8 years). Moreover, 85.0% of AIP1 patients had concurrent autoimmune cholangitis (AIC) while 18.8% of AIP2 patients suffered from overlap to ulcerative colitis (UC). However, AIP1 patients revealed a cholestatic course and had significantly higher immunoglobulin G4 levels (IgG4). When compared to allele frequencies in healthy controls, in patients with AIP1 HLA-B8 reached statistical significance. Response to steroids was excellent in both groups, but we noticed high rates of relapse especially in AIP1 patients. Finally, 3 patients with AIP1 were diagnosed with cholangiocellular carcinoma (CCC). Conclusion. In contrast to Asian studies, we found an almost equal distribution of AIP1 and AIP2 patients in our German cohort. AIP2 patients were younger and mostly of female gender whereas AIP1 patients revealed higher IgG4 levels and involvement of the biliary tract in sense of IgG4-associated cholangitis.

International consensus for the treatment of autoimmune pancreatitis

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

The International Consensus Diagnostic Criteria (ICDC) for AIP has proposed two distinctive type of AIP, type 1 and type 2, and enabled us first to differentiate two types of AIP each other. By initial steroid treatment for induction of remission, remission can be successfully induced in almost all subjects with type 1 and type 2 AIP. As relapse rate in type 1 AIP is significantly higher than in type 2 AIP, there has been ongoing debate on how to treat effectively relapse of type 1 AIP.

METHODS

By a modified Delphi approach, a panel of international experts has proposed an international consensus on the treatment of AIP after intense discussion and deliberation during an international consensus symposium of the International Association of Pancreatology (IAP) 2016.

RESULTS

Individual statements for nine clinical questions with recommendation levels and the therapeutic strategy have been proposed.

CONCLUSION

The recommendations are based on the available evidence, and eastern and western experts' opinions to find standard treatment of AIP worldwide. These recommendations can be tailored according to the local expertise and context in the management of individual patients.

A case of autoimmune pancreatitis effectively treated with an immunosuppressant (azathioprine)

The patient was a 42-year-old man who presented at our hospital with obstructive jaundice. Although antinuclear antibody test results were negative, and immunoglobulin G4 (IgG4) was not elevated, endoscopic ultrasound revealed a mixed internal hyperechoic and diffuse hypoechoic pattern, a finding consistent with autoimmune pancreatitis. Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography further revealed irregular narrowing of the main pancreatic duct and sclerosing cholangitis with distal biliary stricture. In addition, endoscopic ultrasound with fine needle aspiration cytology resulted in a diagnosis of type 1 autoimmune pancreatitis. Oral prednisolone treatment was initiated at 30 mg/day, and the dosage was gradually decreased. However, in accordance with the patient's wishes, maintenance treatment was discontinued once dosage reached 5 mg/day. Despite this, relapse of obstructive jaundice occurred 1 month post discontinuation, and was treated with methyl-prednisolone pulse therapy (500 mg/day) followed by oral prednisolone. However, computed tomography, magnetic resonance imaging, and endoscopic ultrasound did not reveal sufficient improvement after 6 months of treatment. Therefore, an immunosuppressant (azathioprine) was introduced. Subsequent imaging analyses and endoscopic ultrasound fine needle aspiration revealed clear improvements in pathology.