RNA 3D Modules in Genome-Wide Predictions of RNA 2D Structure

Comparative RNA Genomics

Over the last quarter of a century it has become clear that RNA is much more than just a boring intermediate in protein expression. Ancient RNAs still appear in the core information metabolism and comprise a surprisingly large component in bacterial gene regulation. A common theme with these types of mostly small RNAs is their reliance of conserved secondary structures. Large-scale sequencing projects, on the other hand, have profoundly changed our understanding of eukaryotic genomes. Pervasively transcribed, they give rise to a plethora of large and evolutionarily extremely flexible non-coding RNAs that exert a vastly diverse array of molecule functions. In this chapter we provide a-necessarily incomplete-overview of the current state of comparative analysis of non-coding RNAs, emphasizing computational approaches as a means to gain a global picture of the modern RNA world.

Chemical reversible crosslinking enables measurement of RNA 3D distances and alternative conformations in cells

Three-dimensional (3D) structures dictate the functions of RNA molecules in a wide variety of biological processes. However, direct determination of RNA 3D structures in vivo is difficult due to their large sizes, conformational heterogeneity, and dynamics. Here we present a method, Spatial 2'-Hydroxyl Acylation Reversible Crosslinking (SHARC), which uses chemical crosslinkers of defined lengths to measure distances between nucleotides in cellular RNA. Integrating crosslinking, exonuclease (exo) trimming, proximity ligation, and high throughput sequencing, SHARC enables transcriptome-wide tertiary structure contact maps at high accuracy and precision, revealing heterogeneous RNA structures and interactions. SHARC data provide constraints that improves Rosetta-based RNA 3D structure modeling at near-nanometer resolution. Integrating SHARC-exo with other crosslinking-based methods, we discover compact folding of the 7SK RNA, a critical regulator of transcriptional elongation. These results establish a strategy for measuring RNA 3D distances and alternative conformations in their native cellular context.

BiORSEO: a bi-objective method to predict RNA secondary structures with pseudoknots using RNA 3D modules

Motivation

RNA loops have been modelled and clustered from solved 3D structures into ordered collections of recurrent non-canonical interactions called ‘RNA modules’, available in databases. This work explores what information from such modules can be used to improve secondary structure prediction. We propose a bi-objective method for predicting RNA secondary structures by minimizing both an energy-based and a knowledge-based potential. The tool, called BiORSEO, outputs secondary structures corresponding to the optimal solutions from the Pareto set.

Results

We compare several approaches to predict secondary structures using inserted RNA modules information: two module data sources, Rna3Dmotif and the RNA 3D Motif Atlas, and different ways to score the module insertions: module size, module complexity or module probability according to models like JAR3D and BayesPairing. We benchmark them against a large set of known secondary structures, including some state-of-the-art tools, and comment on the usefulness of the half physics-based, half data-based approach.

Availability and implementation

The software is available for download on the EvryRNA website, as well as the datasets.

Supplementary information

Supplementary data are available at Bioinformatics online.

Automated, customizable and efficient identification of 3D base pair modules with BayesPairing

RNA structures possess multiple levels of structural organization. A secondary structure, made of Watson–Crick helices connected by loops, forms a scaffold for the tertiary structure. The 3D structures adopted by these loops are therefore critical determinants shaping the global 3D architecture. Earlier studies showed that these local 3D structures can be described as conserved sets of ordered non-Watson–Crick base pairs called RNA structural modules. Unfortunately, the computational efficiency and scope of the current 3D module identification methods are too limited yet to benefit from all the knowledge accumulated in the module databases. We present BayesPairing, an automated, efficient and customizable tool for (i) building Bayesian networks representing RNA 3D modules and (ii) rapid identification of 3D modules in sequences. BayesPairing uses a flexible definition of RNA 3D modules that allows us to consider complex architectures such as multi-branched loops and features multiple algorithmic improvements. We benchmarked our methods using cross-validation techniques on 3409 RNA chains and show that BayesPairing achieves up to ∼70% identification accuracy on module positions and base pair interactions. BayesPairing can handle a broader range of motifs (versatility) and offers considerable running time improvements (efficiency), opening the door to a broad range of large-scale applications.

Know Your Enemy: Successful Bioinformatic Approaches to Predict Functional RNA Structures in Viral RNAs

Structured RNA elements may control virus replication, transcription and translation, and their distinct features are being exploited by novel antiviral strategies. Viral RNA elements continue to be discovered using combinations of experimental and computational analyses. However, the wealth of sequence data, notably from deep viral RNA sequencing, viromes, and metagenomes, necessitates computational approaches being used as an essential discovery tool. In this review, we describe practical approaches being used to discover functional RNA elements in viral genomes. In addition to success stories in new and emerging viruses, these approaches have revealed some surprising new features of well-studied viruses e.g., human immunodeficiency virus, hepatitis C virus, influenza, and dengue viruses. Some notable discoveries were facilitated by new comparative analyses of diverse viral genome alignments. Importantly, comparative approaches for finding RNA elements embedded in coding and non-coding regions differ. With the exponential growth of computer power we have progressed from stem-loop prediction on single sequences to cutting edge 3D prediction, and from command line to user friendly web interfaces. Despite these advances, many powerful, user friendly prediction tools and resources are underutilized by the virology community.

Comparative RNA Genomics

Over the last two decades it has become clear that RNA is much more than just a boring intermediate in protein expression. Ancient RNAs still appear in the core information metabolism and comprise a surprisingly large component in bacterial gene regulation. A common theme with these types of mostly small RNAs is their reliance of conserved secondary structures. Large scale sequencing projects, on the other hand, have profoundly changed our understanding of eukaryotic genomes. Pervasively transcribed, they give rise to a plethora of large and evolutionarily extremely flexible noncoding RNAs that exert a vastly diverse array of molecule functions. In this chapter we provide a-necessarily incomplete-overview of the current state of comparative analysis of noncoding RNAs, emphasizing computational approaches as a means to gain a global picture of the modern RNA world.

RNA Structure: Advances and Assessment of 3D Structure Prediction

Biological functions of RNA molecules are dependent upon sustained specific three-dimensional (3D) structures of RNA, with or without the help of proteins. Understanding of RNA structure is frequently based on 2D structures, which describe only the Watson-Crick (WC) base pairs. Here, we hierarchically review the structural elements of RNA and how they contribute to RNA 3D structure. We focus our analysis on the non-WC base pairs and on RNA modules. Several computer programs have now been designed to predict RNA modules. We describe the RNA-Puzzles initiative, which is a community-wide, blind assessment of RNA 3D structure prediction programs to determine the capabilities and bottlenecks of current predictions. The assessment metrics used in RNA-Puzzles are briefly described. The detection of RNA 3D modules from sequence data and their automatic implementation belong to the current challenges in RNA 3D structure prediction.