1
|
Zhang L, Mendoza-Sassi RA, Wainwright CE, Aregbesola A, Klassen TP. Nebulised hypertonic saline solution for acute bronchiolitis in infants. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2023; 4:CD006458. [PMID: 37014057 PMCID: PMC10072872 DOI: 10.1002/14651858.cd006458.pub5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 04/05/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Airway oedema (swelling) and mucus plugging are the principal pathological features in infants with acute viral bronchiolitis. Nebulised hypertonic saline solution (≥ 3%) may reduce these pathological changes and decrease airway obstruction. This is an update of a review first published in 2008, and updated in 2010, 2013, and 2017. OBJECTIVES To assess the effects of nebulised hypertonic (≥ 3%) saline solution in infants with acute bronchiolitis. SEARCH METHODS We searched the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), MEDLINE, MEDLINE Epub Ahead of Print, In-Process & Other Non-Indexed Citations, Ovid MEDLINE Daily, Embase, CINAHL, LILACS, and Web of Science on 13 January 2022. We also searched the World Health Organization International Clinical Trials Registry Platform (WHO ICTRP) and ClinicalTrials.gov on 13 January 2022. SELECTION CRITERIA We included randomised controlled trials (RCTs) and quasi-RCTs using nebulised hypertonic saline alone or in conjunction with bronchodilators as an active intervention and nebulised 0.9% saline or standard treatment as a comparator in children under 24 months with acute bronchiolitis. The primary outcome for inpatient trials was length of hospital stay, and the primary outcome for outpatients or emergency department (ED) trials was rate of hospitalisation. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS Two review authors independently performed study selection, data extraction, and assessment of risk of bias in included studies. We conducted random-effects model meta-analyses using Review Manager 5. We used mean difference (MD), risk ratio (RR), and their 95% confidence intervals (CI) as effect size metrics. MAIN RESULTS We included six new trials (N = 1010) in this update, bringing the total number of included trials to 34, involving 5205 infants with acute bronchiolitis, of whom 2727 infants received hypertonic saline. Eleven trials await classification due to insufficient data for eligibility assessment. All included trials were randomised, parallel-group, controlled trials, of which 30 were double-blinded. Twelve trials were conducted in Asia, five in North America, one in South America, seven in Europe, and nine in Mediterranean and Middle East regions. The concentration of hypertonic saline was defined as 3% in all but six trials, in which 5% to 7% saline was used. Nine trials had no funding, and five trials were funded by sources from government or academic agencies. The remaining 20 trials did not provide funding sources. Hospitalised infants treated with nebulised hypertonic saline may have a shorter mean length of hospital stay compared to those treated with nebulised normal (0.9%) saline or standard care (mean difference (MD) -0.40 days, 95% confidence interval (CI) -0.69 to -0.11; 21 trials, 2479 infants; low-certainty evidence). Infants who received hypertonic saline may also have lower postinhalation clinical scores than infants who received normal saline in the first three days of treatment (day 1: MD -0.64, 95% CI -1.08 to -0.21; 10 trials (1 outpatient, 1 ED, 8 inpatient trials), 893 infants; day 2: MD -1.07, 95% CI -1.60 to -0.53; 10 trials (1 outpatient, 1 ED, 8 inpatient trials), 907 infants; day 3: MD -0.89, 95% CI -1.44 to -0.34; 10 trials (1 outpatient, 9 inpatient trials), 785 infants; low-certainty evidence). Nebulised hypertonic saline may reduce the risk of hospitalisation by 13% compared with nebulised normal saline amongst infants who were outpatients and those treated in the ED (risk ratio (RR) 0.87, 95% CI 0.78 to 0.97; 8 trials, 1760 infants; low-certainty evidence). However, hypertonic saline may not reduce the risk of readmission to hospital up to 28 days after discharge (RR 0.83, 95% CI 0.55 to 1.25; 6 trials, 1084 infants; low-certainty evidence). We are uncertain whether infants who received hypertonic saline have a lower number of days to resolution of wheezing compared to those who received normal saline (MD -1.16 days, 95% CI -1.43 to -0.89; 2 trials, 205 infants; very low-certainty evidence), cough (MD -0.87 days, 95% CI -1.31 to -0.44; 3 trials, 363 infants; very low-certainty evidence), and pulmonary moist crackles (MD -1.30 days, 95% CI -2.28 to -0.32; 2 trials, 205 infants; very low-certainty evidence). Twenty-seven trials presented safety data: 14 trials (1624 infants; 767 treated with hypertonic saline, of which 735 (96%) co-administered with bronchodilators) did not report any adverse events, and 13 trials (2792 infants; 1479 treated with hypertonic saline, of which 416 (28%) co-administered with bronchodilators and 1063 (72%) hypertonic saline alone) reported at least one adverse event such as worsening cough, agitation, bronchospasm, bradycardia, desaturation, vomiting and diarrhoea, most of which were mild and resolved spontaneously (low-certainty evidence). AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS Nebulised hypertonic saline may modestly reduce length of stay amongst infants hospitalised with acute bronchiolitis and may slightly improve clinical severity score. Treatment with nebulised hypertonic saline may also reduce the risk of hospitalisation amongst outpatients and ED patients. Nebulised hypertonic saline seems to be a safe treatment in infants with bronchiolitis with only minor and spontaneously resolved adverse events, especially when administered in conjunction with a bronchodilator. The certainty of the evidence was low to very low for all outcomes, mainly due to inconsistency and risk of bias.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Linjie Zhang
- Faculty of Medicine, Federal University of Rio Grande, Rio Grande, Brazil
| | | | - Claire E Wainwright
- Department of Respiratory Medicine, Royal Children's Hospital, Brisbane, Australia
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
2
|
Prevention and Treatment Strategies for Respiratory Syncytial Virus (RSV). Pathogens 2023; 12:pathogens12020154. [PMID: 36839426 PMCID: PMC9961958 DOI: 10.3390/pathogens12020154] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 15.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/05/2022] [Revised: 01/10/2023] [Accepted: 01/11/2023] [Indexed: 01/19/2023] Open
Abstract
Respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) is a leading cause of severe lower respiratory tract disease, especially in young children. Despite its global impact on healthcare, related to its high prevalence and its association with significant morbidity, the current therapy is still mostly supportive. Moreover, while more than 50 years have passed since the first trial of an RSV vaccine (which unfortunately caused enhanced RSV disease), no vaccine has been approved for RSV prevention. In the last two decades, our understanding of the pathogenesis and immunopathology of RSV have continued to evolve, leading to significant advancements in RSV prevention strategies. These include both the development of new potential vaccines and the successful implementation of passive immunization, which, together, will provide coverage from infancy to old age. In this review, we provide an update of the current treatment options for acute disease (RSV-specific and -non-specific) and different therapeutic approaches focusing on RSV prevention.
Collapse
|
3
|
Milési C, Baudin F, Durand P, Emeriaud G, Essouri S, Pouyau R, Baleine J, Beldjilali S, Bordessoule A, Breinig S, Demaret P, Desprez P, Gaillard-Leroux B, Guichoux J, Guilbert AS, Guillot C, Jean S, Levy M, Noizet-Yverneau O, Rambaud J, Recher M, Reynaud S, Valla F, Radoui K, Faure MA, Ferraro G, Mortamet G. Clinical practice guidelines: management of severe bronchiolitis in infants under 12 months old admitted to a pediatric critical care unit. Intensive Care Med 2023; 49:5-25. [PMID: 36592200 DOI: 10.1007/s00134-022-06918-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/09/2022] [Accepted: 10/13/2022] [Indexed: 01/03/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE We present guidelines for the management of infants under 12 months of age with severe bronchiolitis with the aim of creating a series of pragmatic recommendations for a patient subgroup that is poorly individualized in national and international guidelines. METHODS Twenty-five French-speaking experts, all members of the Groupe Francophone de Réanimation et Urgence Pédiatriques (French-speaking group of paediatric intensive and emergency care; GFRUP) (Algeria, Belgium, Canada, France, Switzerland), collaborated from 2021 to 2022 through teleconferences and face-to-face meetings. The guidelines cover five areas: (1) criteria for admission to a pediatric critical care unit, (2) environment and monitoring, (3) feeding and hydration, (4) ventilatory support and (5) adjuvant therapies. The questions were written in the Patient-Intervention-Comparison-Outcome (PICO) format. An extensive Anglophone and Francophone literature search indexed in the MEDLINE database via PubMed, Web of Science, Cochrane and Embase was performed using pre-established keywords. The texts were analyzed and classified according to the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) methodology. When this method did not apply, an expert opinion was given. Each of these recommendations was voted on by all the experts according to the Delphi methodology. RESULTS This group proposes 40 recommendations. The GRADE methodology could be applied for 17 of them (3 strong, 14 conditional) and an expert opinion was given for the remaining 23. All received strong approval during the first round of voting. CONCLUSION These guidelines cover the different aspects in the management of severe bronchiolitis in infants admitted to pediatric critical care units. Compared to the different ways to manage patients with severe bronchiolitis described in the literature, our original work proposes an overall less invasive approach in terms of monitoring and treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Christophe Milési
- Pediatric Intensive Care Unit, Montpellier University Hospital, Montpellier, France.
| | - Florent Baudin
- Pediatric Intensive Care Unit, Lyon Hospital Femme-Mère-Enfants, Bron, France
| | - Philippe Durand
- Pediatric Intensive Care Unit, Bicêtre Hospital, Assistance Publique des Hôpitaux de Paris, Kremlin-Bicêtre, France
| | - Guillaume Emeriaud
- Pediatric Intensive Care Unit, Sainte-Justine University Hospital, Montreal, Canada
| | - Sandrine Essouri
- Pediatric Department, Sainte-Justine University Hospital, Montreal, Canada
| | - Robin Pouyau
- Pediatric Intensive Care Unit, Lyon Hospital Femme-Mère-Enfants, Bron, France
| | - Julien Baleine
- Pediatric Intensive Care Unit, Montpellier University Hospital, Montpellier, France
| | - Sophie Beldjilali
- Pediatric Intensive Care Unit, La Timone University Hospital, Assistance Publique des Hôpitaux de Marseille, Marseille, France
| | - Alice Bordessoule
- Pediatric Intensive Care Unit, Geneva University Hospital, Geneva, Switzerland
| | - Sophie Breinig
- Pediatric Intensive Care Unit, Toulouse University Hospital, Toulouse, France
| | - Pierre Demaret
- Intensive Care Unit, Liège University Hospital, Liège, Belgium
| | - Philippe Desprez
- Pediatric Intensive Care Unit, Point-à-Pitre University Hospital, Point-à-Pitre, France
| | | | - Julie Guichoux
- Pediatric Intensive Care Unit, Bordeaux University Hospital, Bordeaux, France
| | - Anne-Sophie Guilbert
- Pediatric Intensive Care Unit, Strasbourg University Hospital, Strasbourg, France
| | - Camille Guillot
- Pediatric Intensive Care Unit, Lille University Hospital, Lille, France
| | - Sandrine Jean
- Pediatric Intensive Care Unit, Trousseau Hospital, Assistance Publique des Hôpitaux de Paris, Paris, France
| | - Michael Levy
- Pediatric Intensive Care Unit, Robert Debré Hospital, Assistance Publique des Hôpitaux de Paris, Paris, France
| | | | - Jérôme Rambaud
- Pediatric Intensive Care Unit, Trousseau Hospital, Assistance Publique des Hôpitaux de Paris, Paris, France
| | - Morgan Recher
- Pediatric Intensive Care Unit, Lille University Hospital, Lille, France
| | - Stéphanie Reynaud
- Pediatric Intensive Care Unit, Lyon Hospital Femme-Mère-Enfants, Bron, France
| | - Fréderic Valla
- Pediatric Intensive Care Unit, Lyon Hospital Femme-Mère-Enfants, Bron, France
| | - Karim Radoui
- Pneumology EHS Pediatric Department, Faculté de Médecine d'Oran, Canastel, Oran, Algeria
| | | | - Guillaume Ferraro
- Pediatric Emergency Department, Nice University Hospital, Nice, France
| | - Guillaume Mortamet
- Pediatric Intensive Care Unit, Grenoble-Alpes University Hospital, Grenoble, France
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Pereira RA, Oliveira de Almeida V, Zambrano M, Zhang L, Amantéa SL. Effects of nebulized epinephrine in association with hypertonic saline for infants with acute bronchiolitis: A systematic review and meta‐analysis. Health Sci Rep 2022; 5:e598. [PMID: 35509393 PMCID: PMC9059211 DOI: 10.1002/hsr2.598] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/10/2021] [Accepted: 02/06/2022] [Indexed: 12/03/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Nebulized epinephrine and hypertonic saline have been extensively studied in infants with acute bronchiolitis, with conflicting results. Aims To evaluate the efficacy on length of stay (LOS), clinical severity scores (CSS), oxygen saturation (SaO2), and safety profile of nebulized epinephrine plus hypertonic saline (HS) in infants with acute bronchiolitis. Materials & Methods This is a systematic review and meta‐analysis. Outcomes were represented by mean differences (MD) or standard mean differences (SMD) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were utilized. Results Eighteen trials were systematically selected and 16 of them contributed to the meta‐analysis (1756 patients). Overall, a modest but significant positive impact was observed of the combination therapy on LOS (MD of –0.35 days, 95% CI −0.62 to −0.08, p = 0.01, I2 = 91%). Stratification by time of CSS assessment unveiled positive results in favor of the combination therapy in CSS assessed 48 and 72 h after the admission (SMD of −0.35, 95% CI −0.62 to −0.09, p = 0.008, I2 = 41% and SMD of −0.27, 95% CI −0.50 to −0.04, p = 0.02, I2 = 0%, respectively). No difference in SaO2 was observed. Additional data showed a consistent safety profile, with a low rate of adverse events (1%), most of them mild and transient. Conclusion Low‐quality evidence from this systematic review suggests that nebulized epinephrine plus HS may be considered as a safe and efficient therapy for decreasing LOS and CSS in infants with acute bronchiolitis, especially in those who require hospitalization for more than 48 h.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Renan A. Pereira
- Department of Pediatrics Federal University of Health Sciences of Porto Alegre Porto Alegre Brazil
| | | | - Mariana Zambrano
- Department of Pediatrics Federal University of Health Sciences of Porto Alegre Porto Alegre Brazil
| | - Linjie Zhang
- Maternal‐Infant Department, Faculty of Medicine Federal University of Rio Grande Rio Grande Brazil
| | - Sérgio L. Amantéa
- Department of Pediatrics Federal University of Health Sciences of Porto Alegre Porto Alegre Brazil
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Sagar H, Dhal S. Managing bronchiolitis in pediatric patients: Current evidence. INDIAN JOURNAL OF RESPIRATORY CARE 2022. [DOI: 10.4103/ijrc.ijrc_153_22] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/15/2022] Open
|
6
|
Association of Fluid Overload With Clinical Outcomes in Critically Ill Children With Bronchiolitis: Bronquiolitis en la Unidad de Cuidados Intensivos Pediátricos (BRUCIP) Study. Pediatr Crit Care Med 2019; 20:e130-e136. [PMID: 30664037 DOI: 10.1097/pcc.0000000000001841] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Increasing evidence supports the association of fluid overload with adverse outcomes in different diseases. To our knowledge, few studies have examined the impact of fluid balance on clinical outcome in severe bronchiolitis. Our aim was to determine whether fluid overload was associated with adverse clinical outcomes in critically ill children with severe bronchiolitis. DESIGN Descriptive, prospective, multicenter study. SETTING Sixteen Spanish PICUs. PATIENTS Severe acute bronchiolitis who required admission from October 2014 to May 2015 were included. INTERVENTIONS None. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS Total fluid intake and output were prospectively recorded during PICU assistance. Fluid balance was measured at 24, 48, and 72 hours after PICU admission. A total of 262 patients were enrolled; 54.6% were male. Median age was 1 month (interquartile range, 1-3 mo). Patients had a positive fluid balance during the first 4 days of PICU admission, reaching a neutral balance on day 4. A positive balance at 24 hours in patients admitted to the PICU with severe bronchiolitis was related with longer stay in PICU (p < 0.001), longer hospital stay (p < 0.001), longer duration of mechanical ventilation (p = 0.016), and longer duration of noninvasive ventilation (p = 0.0029). CONCLUSIONS Critically ill patients with severe acute bronchiolitis who present a positive balance in the first 24 hours of PICU admission have poorer clinical outcomes with longer PICU and hospital length of stay and duration of invasive and noninvasive mechanical ventilation.
Collapse
|
7
|
Morikawa Y, Miura M, Furuhata MY, Morino S, Omori T, Otsuka M, Chiga M, Obonai T, Hataya H, Kaneko T, Ishikura K, Honda M, Hasegawa Y. Nebulized hypertonic saline in infants hospitalized with moderately severe bronchiolitis due to RSV infection: A multicenter randomized controlled trial. Pediatr Pulmonol 2018; 53:358-365. [PMID: 29327810 DOI: 10.1002/ppul.23945] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/11/2017] [Accepted: 12/13/2017] [Indexed: 11/09/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION The efficacy of nebulized hypertonic saline (HS) therapy for shortening hospital length of stay (LOS) or improving bronchiolitic symptoms remains controversial. Most studies enrolled small numbers of subjects and did not consider the role of respiratory syncytial virus (RSV), the most common cause of acute bronchiolitis. Our aim was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of nebulized HS therapy for acute bronchiolitis due to RSV in moderately ill hospitalized infants. MATERIALS AND METHODS This was an open-label, multicenter, randomized controlled trial comparing a nebulized HS treatment group with a normal saline (NS) group. The subjects, 128 infants with bronchiolitis due to RSV, were admitted to five hospitals in Tokyo, Japan. Three-percent HS or NS was administered via bronchodilator four times daily post-admission. The primary outcome was LOS, defined as the time until the patients fulfilled the discharge criteria, namely, absence of fever, no need for supplemental oxygen, and adequate feeding. Survival analysis was conducted in accordance with the intention-to-treat principle. RESULTS The baseline characteristics were similar between the two groups. There was no significant overall difference in LOS between the groups (4.81 ± 2.14 days in HS vs 4.61 ± 2.18 days in NS; P = 0.60). Survival analysis by log-rank test also showed no significance (P = 0.62). Multivariate adjustment did not significantly alter the results. The treatment was well-tolerated, with no adverse effects attributable to the use of HS. CONCLUSIONS Nebulized HS therapy did not significantly reduce LOS among infants with bronchiolitis due to RSV.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yoshihiko Morikawa
- Clinical Research Support Center, Tokyo Metropolitan Children's Medical Center, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Masaru Miura
- Clinical Research Support Center, Tokyo Metropolitan Children's Medical Center, Tokyo, Japan.,Department of Pediatric Cardiology, Tokyo Metropolitan Children's Medical Center, Tokyo, Japan
| | | | - Saeko Morino
- Department of Infectious Diseases, Tokyo Metropolitan Children's Medical Center, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Tae Omori
- Department of Pediatrics, Tokyo Metropolitan Bokutoh Hospital, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Masahiro Otsuka
- Department of Pediatrics, Tokyo Metropolitan Bokutoh Hospital, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Michiko Chiga
- Department of Pediatrics, Tokyo Metropolitan Ohtsuka Hospital, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Toshimasa Obonai
- Department of Pediatrics, Tokyo Metropolitan Health and Medical Treatment Corporation, Tama-Hokubu Medical Center, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Hiroshi Hataya
- Department of General Pediatrics, Tokyo Metropolitan Children's Medical Center, Tokyo, Japan.,Department of Nephrology, Tokyo Metropolitan Children's Medical Center, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Tetsuji Kaneko
- Clinical Research Support Center, Tokyo Metropolitan Children's Medical Center, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Kenji Ishikura
- Clinical Research Support Center, Tokyo Metropolitan Children's Medical Center, Tokyo, Japan.,Department of Nephrology, Tokyo Metropolitan Children's Medical Center, Tokyo, Japan.,Division of Nephrology and Rheumatology, National Center for Child Health and Development, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Masataka Honda
- Department of Nephrology, Tokyo Metropolitan Children's Medical Center, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Yukihiro Hasegawa
- Department of General Pediatrics, Tokyo Metropolitan Children's Medical Center, Tokyo, Japan.,Department of Endocrinology and Metabolism, Tokyo Metropolitan Children's Medical Center, Tokyo, Japan
| | | |
Collapse
|
8
|
Zhang L, Mendoza‐Sassi RA, Wainwright C, Klassen TP. Nebulised hypertonic saline solution for acute bronchiolitis in infants. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2017; 12:CD006458. [PMID: 29265171 PMCID: PMC6485976 DOI: 10.1002/14651858.cd006458.pub4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 37] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/29/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Airway oedema (swelling) and mucus plugging are the principal pathological features in infants with acute viral bronchiolitis. Nebulised hypertonic saline solution (≥ 3%) may reduce these pathological changes and decrease airway obstruction. This is an update of a review first published in 2008, and previously updated in 2010 and 2013. OBJECTIVES To assess the effects of nebulised hypertonic (≥ 3%) saline solution in infants with acute bronchiolitis. SEARCH METHODS We searched the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), MEDLINE, MEDLINE Epub Ahead of Print, In-Process & Other Non-Indexed Citations, Ovid MEDLINE Daily, Embase, CINAHL, LILACS, and Web of Science on 11 August 2017. We also searched the World Health Organization International Clinical Trials Registry Platform (WHO ICTRP) and ClinicalTrials.gov on 8 April 2017. SELECTION CRITERIA We included randomised controlled trials and quasi-randomised controlled trials using nebulised hypertonic saline alone or in conjunction with bronchodilators as an active intervention and nebulised 0.9% saline, or standard treatment as a comparator in children under 24 months with acute bronchiolitis. The primary outcome for inpatient trials was length of hospital stay, and the primary outcome for outpatients or emergency department trials was rate of hospitalisation. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS Two review authors independently performed study selection, data extraction, and assessment of risk of bias in included studies. We conducted random-effects model meta-analyses using Review Manager 5. We used mean difference (MD), risk ratio (RR), and their 95% confidence intervals (CI) as effect size metrics. MAIN RESULTS We identified 26 new trials in this update, of which 9 await classification due to insufficient data for eligibility assessment, and 17 trials (N = 3105) met the inclusion criteria. We included a total of 28 trials involving 4195 infants with acute bronchiolitis, of whom 2222 infants received hypertonic saline.Hospitalised infants treated with nebulised hypertonic saline had a statistically significant shorter mean length of hospital stay compared to those treated with nebulised 0.9% saline (MD -0.41 days, 95% CI -0.75 to -0.07; P = 0.02, I² = 79%; 17 trials; 1867 infants) (GRADE quality of evidence: low). Infants who received hypertonic saline also had statistically significant lower post-inhalation clinical scores than infants who received 0.9% saline in the first three days of treatment (day 1: MD -0.77, 95% CI -1.18 to -0.36, P < 0.001; day 2: MD -1.28, 95% CI -1.91 to -0.65, P < 0.001; day 3: MD -1.43, 95% CI -1.82 to -1.04, P < 0.001) (GRADE quality of evidence: low).Nebulised hypertonic saline reduced the risk of hospitalisation by 14% compared with nebulised 0.9% saline among infants who were outpatients and those treated in the emergency department (RR 0.86, 95% CI 0.76 to 0.98; P = 0.02, I² = 7%; 8 trials; 1723 infants) (GRADE quality of evidence: moderate).Twenty-four trials presented safety data: 13 trials (1363 infants, 703 treated with hypertonic saline) did not report any adverse events, and 11 trials (2360 infants, 1265 treated with hypertonic saline) reported at least one adverse event, most of which were mild and resolved spontaneously. AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS Nebulised hypertonic saline may modestly reduce length of stay among infants hospitalised with acute bronchiolitis and improve clinical severity score. Treatment with nebulised hypertonic saline may also reduce the risk of hospitalisation among outpatients and emergency department patients. However, we assessed the quality of the evidence as low to moderate.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Linjie Zhang
- Federal University of Rio GrandeFaculty of MedicineRua Visconde Paranaguá 102CentroRio GrandeRSBrazil96201‐900
| | - Raúl A Mendoza‐Sassi
- Federal University of Rio GrandeFaculty of MedicineRua Visconde Paranaguá 102CentroRio GrandeRSBrazil96201‐900
| | - Claire Wainwright
- Royal Children's HospitalDepartment of Respiratory MedicineHerston RoadHerstonBrisbaneQueenslandAustralia4029
| | - Terry P Klassen
- Manitoba Institute of Child Health513‐715 McDermot AvenueWinnipegMBCanadaR3E 3P4
| | | |
Collapse
|
9
|
Sakulchit T, Goldman RD. Nebulized epinephrine for young children with bronchiolitis. CANADIAN FAMILY PHYSICIAN MEDECIN DE FAMILLE CANADIEN 2016; 62:991-993. [PMID: 27965333 PMCID: PMC5154648] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/06/2023]
Abstract
QUESTION Every winter I see infants with flulike symptoms and wheezing. I frequently diagnose them with bronchiolitis based on their presenting symptoms. Would it be prudent to send those infants to the nearest emergency department for treatment with nebulized epinephrine? ANSWER Nebulized epinephrine should not be routinely used in infants with bronchiolitis. It is an option to consider in those with severe symptoms. If it is given and there are no signs of improvement, further doses are discouraged. Ongoing studies of epinephrine combined with other agents (eg, hypertonic saline, oral dexamethasone) are needed to confirm their benefit.
Collapse
|
10
|
Sakulchit T, Goldman RD. [Not Available]. CANADIAN FAMILY PHYSICIAN MEDECIN DE FAMILLE CANADIEN 2016; 62:e718-e720. [PMID: 27965346 PMCID: PMC5154661] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/06/2023]
Abstract
Question Tous les ans, durant l’hiver, je vois des nourrissons qui présentent des symptômes pseudo-grippaux et des sibilances. Je pose souvent un diagnostic de bronchiolite en fonction du tableau clinique. Serait-il prudent d’envoyer ces nourrissons à l’urgence la plus proche pour recevoir un traitement par nébulisation d’épinéphrine? Réponse La nébulisation d’épinéphrine ne doit pas être administrée systématiquement aux nourrissons atteints de bronchiolite. C’est une option à envisager chez les patients qui manifestent des symptômes graves. S’il n’y a aucun signe d’amélioration après l’administration d’épinéphrine, les doses subséquentes sont déconseillées. Il est nécessaire de poursuivre les études sur l’épinéphrine associée à d’autres agents (p. ex. solution saline hypertonique, dexaméthasone par voie orale) pour en confirmer les bienfaits.
Collapse
|
11
|
Anthracopoulos MB. Nebulised hypertonic saline for acute bronchiolitis or 'there and back again' to use Tolkien's subtitle for The Hobbit. Acta Paediatr 2016; 105:1006-8. [PMID: 27514006 DOI: 10.1111/apa.13509] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Michael B Anthracopoulos
- Respiratory Unit, Department of Paediatrics, University Hospital of Patras, School of Medicine of the University of Patras, Rion-Patras, Greece. ,
| |
Collapse
|