Foveal Damage Due to Subfoveal Hemorrhage Associated with Branch Retinal Vein Occlusion

Macular dynamics and visual acuity prognosis in retinal vein occlusions - ways to connect

Background and Objectives: This study aimed to establish possible connections between macular dynamics, various macular features, and visual acuity prognosis among patients with retinal vein occlusions. Materials and Methods: This study included 85 patients with central retinal vein occlusions (CRVO) and 26 with branch retinal vein occlusions (BRVO). We assessed macular features such as central macular thickness (CMT), foveal intraretinal hemorrhage (IRH), the presence and distribution of hyperreflective foci (HF), ellipsoid zone (EZ) disruption, inner retinal layer disorganization (DRIL), and posterior vitreous detachment (PVD), as well as their dynamics over one year of observation and their impact on final visual acuity prognosis, depending on the type of occlusion. Results: Best corrected visual acuity (BCVA) evolution is statistically significant regarding groups of age and type of occlusion and insignificant regarding gender. The best response to intravitreal treatment, quantified as a decrease in CMT, was registered after the first intravitreal injection. Connecting a decrease in CMT with BCVA improvement, we did not register a statistically significant correlation in the CRVO group, only in BRVO cases. The study results showed that complete PVD plays a significant positive role in decreasing CMT and BCVA improvement in cases of CRVO. Our study revealed that no matter the type of occlusion, the presence of foveal IRH will have a negative impact on the BCVA outcome. Statistically significant differences have been noted only for the evolution of visual acuity in non-ischemic CRVO cases, in correlation with the presence of EZ disruption. Outer retinal layer HF has proved to be a predictive factor for poor visual acuity outcomes. Conclusions: The most important non-imaging predicting factors regarding BCVA after retinal vein occlusions are age and baseline BCVA. CMT's dynamics still establish a weak connection with visual acuity fluctuations. The presence of foveal IRH, outer retinal layer HF, and foveal EZ disruption has a negative impact on visual acuity outcomes. Abbreviations: CRVO = central retinal vein occlusions, BRVO = branch retinal vein occlusions, CMT = central macular thickness, IRH = foveal intraretinal hemorrhage, HF = hyperreflective foci, EZ = ellipsoid zone disruption, DRIL = inner retinal layer disorganization, PVD = posterior vitreous detachment, BCVA = best corrected visual acuity, OCT = optical coherence tomography, BCVA Ti = best corrected visual acuity at first, BCVA Tf = best corrected visual acuity after one year, NR of IVI = number of intravitreal injections, SD = standard deviation, M = male, F = female, CMT Ti = central macular thickness at first, CMT T1 = central macular thickness after first injection, CMT T3 = central macular thickness after 3 injections, CMT Tf = central macular thickness after one year.

Efficacy and effectiveness of anti-VEGF or steroids monotherapy versus combination treatment for macular edema secondary to retinal vein occlusion: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Retinal vein occlusion (RVO) is the main cause of retinal vascular blindness. Laser photocoagulation therapy is the regarded as the standard treatment for branch retinal vein occlusion (BRVO) in the guidelines, but it is not effective for macular edema (ME) secondary to central retinal vein occlusion (CRVO). As anti-VEGF (vascular endothelial growth factor) or steroids monotherapy has been used to treat RVO, but each has its advantages and disadvantages. Our purpose was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of intraocular injection of anti-VEGF combined with steroids versus anti-VEGF or steroids monotherapy for ME secondary to RVO.

METHODS

We systematically searched trials on Pubmed, Embase, Cochrane Library, Web of Science and China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI) for RCTs (random clinical trials) or non-RCTs, comparing anti-VEGF or steroids monotherapy to their combination. The primary outcomes were changes in best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), central macular thickness (CMT) and intraocular pressure (IOP). The pooled data was analyzed by random effects model.

FINDINGS

A total of 10 studies selected from 366 studies were included in this meta-analysis. Our results favored anti-VEGF with steroids combination therapy in comparison with anti-VEGF {pooled SMD (standardized mean difference), 95% CI, -0.16 [-0.28, -0.04], P = 0.01} or steroids (pooled SMD, 95% CI, -0.56 [-0.73, -0.40], P < 0.00001) alone on changes of BCVA. Compared with anti-VEGF monotherapy group, the combination therapy also had a better effect {pooled MD (mean difference), 95% CI, -9.62 [-17.31, -1.93], P = 0.01)} at improvements on CMT. On the changes of IOP, assessment favored that combination therapy was associated with a better relief of IOP compared to steroids monotherapy group (pooled MD, 95% CI, -5.93 [-7.87, -3.99],P < 0.00001). What's more, the incidence of ocular hypertension was lower in the combined treatment group compared with control group treated with steroids alone (Odds Ratio, 95% CI, 0.21 [0.06, 0.77], P = 0.02). Results also showed that the combination group can prolong the average time to first anti-VEGF reinjection (MD, 95% CI, 1.74 [0.57, 2.90], P = 0.003) compared to control group treated with anti-VEGF alone.

CONCLUSION

Anti-VEGF with steroids combination treatment can enable a better achievement of improving BCVA, CMT, reducing the risk of increased IOP and improving patient prognosis compared to anti-VEGF or steroids therapy alone, lengthening the average time to anti-VEGF reinjection with reducing the injections during follow-up.

Two-Week Central Macular Thickness Reduction Rate >37% Predicts the Long-Term Efficacy of Anti-vascular Endothelial Growth Factor Treatment for Macular Edema Secondary to Retinal Vein Occlusion

Objective

To determine if the early response assessments can predict the long-term efficacy of anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) treatment for macular edema secondary to retinal vein occlusion (RVO-ME).

Methods

A retrospective study of patients with diagnosis of RVO-ME and intravitreal anti-VEGF treatment was conducted. Clinical characteristics including age, gender, disease subtype and disease duration were recorded at baseline. The best corrected visual acuity (BCVA and logMAR), intraocular pressure (IOP), and central macular thickness (CMT) were recorded at baseline, 2 weeks, and every month (months 1–6) after injection. Further, we compared the early response assessments between the cured group (6-month CMT ≤ 250 μm) and the uncured group (6-month CMT &gt; 250 μm).

Results

A total of 164 eyes in 164 patients (77 male and 87 female) were included. At each post-injection time point, both BCVA and CMT are significantly decreased from baseline (all P &lt; 0.001). Spearman’s test showed that 2-week CMT reduction rate after the first injection was negatively correlated with BCVA at 6 months (r = −0.359, P &lt; 0.001). Compared with the uncured group (47 cases), the cured group (117 cases) was younger (59.53 ± 11.68 vs. 65.19 ± 13.10 years old, P &lt; 0.01), had more BRVO patients (76.1% vs. 44.7%, P &lt; 0.01), a shorter disease duration (1.92 ± 2.43 vs. 5.05 ± 4.32 months, P &lt; 0.01), lower baseline CMT (527.09 ± 154.95 vs. 768.96 ± 287.75 μm, P &lt; 0.01), and lower baseline BCVA (0.86 ± 0.44 vs. 1.31 ± 0.51, P &lt; 0.01). At each post-injection time point, the cured group had lower CMT and BCVA values when compared to the uncured group (all P &lt; 0.01), and the 2-week CMT reduction rate was identified as the earliest response time to predict the long-term treatment efficacy. Moreover, ROC curve analysis indicated that a 2-week CMT reduction rate &gt;37% yielded the best cut-off point for predicting the long-term cure of anti-VEGF treatment at 6 months (P &lt; 0.001). Multivariable logistic regression confirmed that the 2-week CMT reduction rate &gt;37% was independently associated with the 6-month cured rate (OR = 9.639, 95% Cl = 1.030–90.227, P = 0.047).

Conclusion

Age, disease duration, baseline CMT, and baseline BCVA are associated with visual outcomes at 6-month of anti-VEGF treatment for RVO-ME. The “2-week CMT reduction rate &gt;37%” after the first injection is an independent factor to predict better long-term outcomes.

Multimodal Imaging of Microvascular Abnormalities in Retinal Vein Occlusion

The technologies of ocular imaging modalities such as optical coherence tomography (OCT) and OCT angiography (OCTA) have progressed remarkably. Of these in vivo imaging modalities, recently advanced OCT technology provides high-resolution images, e.g., histologic imaging, enabling anatomical analysis of each retinal layer, including the photoreceptor layers. Recently developed OCTA also visualizes the vascular networks three-dimensionally, which provides better understanding of the retinal deep capillary layer. In addition, ex vivo analysis using autologous aqueous or vitreous humor shows that inflammatory cytokine levels including vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) are elevated and correlated with the severity of macular edema (ME) in eyes with retinal vein occlusion (RVO). Furthermore, a combination of multiple modalities enables deeper understanding of the pathology. Regarding therapy, intravitreal injection of anti-VEGF drugs provides rapid resolution of ME and much better visual improvements than conventional treatments in eyes with RVO. Thus, the technologies of examination and treatment for managing eyes with RVO have progressed rapidly. In this paper, we review the multimodal imaging and therapeutic strategies for eyes with RVO with the hope that it provides better understanding of the pathology and leads to the development of new therapies.

Angiographic Risk Features of Branch Retinal Vein Occlusion Onset as Determined by Optical Coherence Tomography Angiography

Purpose

Examine associations between the vasculature at arteriovenous (AV) crossings and the onset of branch retinal vein occlusion (BRVO).

Methods

We included 78 patients with major BRVO, 35 patients with macular BRVO, and 110 controls without BRVO and determined the vessel positions at AV crossings, where the first- or second-order branches of the retinal veins associate, using a viewing angle of 12 × 12 mm² in optical coherence tomography angiography (OCTA).

Results

We reviewed 1349 and 1276 AV crossings in BRVO patients and control subjects, respectively. The proportions of venous overcrossing were 26.5%, 28.6%, and 26.8% at non-causative crossings in BRVO eyes, non-BRVO fellow eyes, and unaffected control eyes, respectively; however, the rate of venous overcrossings at the causative crossings was 45.1%. In OCTA analyses, we divided the branches into macular- or non-macular veins. The rate of venous overcrossing was 52.5% at causative crossings in major BRVO but was 28.6% in macular BRVO. Odds ratios for whether venous overcrossing was a risk factor for BRVO were 3.09 (95% confidence interval [CI], 1.96–4.88) and 0.94 (95% CI, 0.44–2.00) for non-macular veins and macular veins, respectively. The patients with major BRVO caused by venous overcrossing were younger than patients for whom the cause was arterial overcrossing (P < 0.001). The onset of macular BRVO did not differ between crossing patterns at causative crossings (P = 0.60).

Conclusions

In eyes with BRVO, venous overcrossing was a common angiographic feature at causative crossings and might be a risk factor for major BRVO onset.

RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN ABNORMALITIES OF PHOTORECEPTOR MICROSTRUCTURES AND MICROVASCULAR STRUCTURES DETERMINED BY OPTICAL COHERENCE TOMOGRAPHY ANGIOGRAPHY IN EYES WITH BRANCH RETINAL VEIN OCCLUSION

PURPOSE

To determine whether the size of the foveal avascular zone (FAZ) is significantly correlated with the best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) and to examine the relationship between the size and microstructural changes of the photoreceptors in eyes with a branch retinal vein occlusion.

METHODS

The medical records of 69 eyes of patients (mean age, 64.6 ± 11.7 years) with a branch retinal vein occlusion were reviewed after the resolution of macular edema. All the patients underwent optical coherence tomography angiography for measurement of the FAZ area and spectral domain optical coherence tomography for determination of microstructural changes of the photoreceptors at the fovea.

RESULTS

The superficial and deep FAZ areas in eyes with a branch retinal vein occlusion were 0.39 ± 0.36 mm and 0.63 ± 0.18 mm, respectively, and both were significantly larger than those observed in the fellow eyes (both, P < 0.001). The superficial FAZ area correlated with the posttreatment BCVA (r = 0.285, P = 0.027) but not with any parameters regarding the microstructures of the photoreceptors. Multivariate linear regression analysis showed that the pretreatment BCVA (β = 0.519, P < 0.001) and integrity of the external limiting membrane (β = -0.373, P = 0.001) were independent factors that significantly correlated with the posttreatment BCVA.

CONCLUSION

There was no significant correlation between the FAZ area and microstructural parameters. However, the integrity of the external limiting membrane was significantly correlated with the posttreatment BCVA in eyes with a branch retinal vein occlusion.

Predicting recurrences of macular edema due to branch retinal vein occlusion during anti-vascular endothelial growth factor therapy

PURPOSE

To determine the predictive factors for recurrent macular edema due to branch retinal vein occlusion (BRVO) during intravitreal ranibizumab (IVR) monotherapy.

METHODS

Clinical records were retrospectively reviewed for 65 patients (mean age 66.5 years, 65 eyes) who were diagnosed with macular edema due to BRVO and treated with IVR monotherapy for 12 months at the Medical Retina Division, Department of Ophthalmology, Keio University Hospital between October 2013 and August 2017. Best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), fundus findings, and sectional optical coherence tomography (OCT) images were analyzed.

RESULTS

Overall BCVA and central retinal thickness (CRT) improved (all p < 0.01). BCVA at 12 months was significantly worse in patients with recurrent macular edema (40 eyes [61.5%]) (p < 0.01) than in those without, while CRT decreased and was comparable in both groups at 12 months. Logistic regression analyses showed association of recurrence with disorganization of the retinal inner layer (DRIL) temporal to the fovea at baseline (odds ratio = 7.74; 95% confidence interval 1.62-37.08, p = 0.01), after adjusting for age, gender, and initial CRT.

CONCLUSION

Recurrent macular edema due to BRVO affects visual outcome and is associated with initial DRIL temporal to the fovea, evaluated using OCT sectional images before treatments. DRIL may facilitate determination of follow-up schedules in clinical practice.

Arteriovenous crossing associated with branch retinal vein occlusion

Branch retinal vein occlusion (BRVO) is defined as the focal occlusion of a first or second-order branch of retinal vein, which occurs most frequently at an arteriovenous (AV) crossing. Direct ophthalmoscopy, color fundus photography, and fluorescein angiography facilitate observation of AV crossings parallel to the retinal plane. Optical coherence tomography (OCT), with its high-depth resolution, enables observation of retinal lesions perpendicular to the retinal plane. OCT angiography (OCTA) provides depth-resolved images of the retinal vasculature by segmenting three-dimensional data. In this review, we discuss novel findings related to affected AV crossings associated with BRVO obtained via OCT and OCTA. The high-depth resolution of OCT or OCTA is useful for observation of the narrowed vein and determination of the vessel position of the affected AV crossing. Studies using OCT and OCTA have shown that BRVO caused by a venous overcrossing is more prevalent than previously reported, and that venous narrowing was significantly greater in instances caused by a venous overcrossing than in those caused by an arterial overcrossing. Moreover, OCTA also revealed that the retinal nonperfusion area size was larger in eyes with BRVO caused by a venous overcrossing than in those with BRVO caused by an arterial overcrossing. This contrasts with earlier findings obtained by conventional imaging modalities predating OCT, which showed that an arterial overcrossing was more common than a venous overcrossing at the causative venous occlusion site in eyes with BRVO. This review discusses these findings and their significance in the study of AV crossing associated with BRVO.

Mechanisms of vision loss in eyes with macular edema associated with retinal vein occlusion

Anti-vascular endothelial growth factor agents reduce macular edema and improve vision in eyes with macular edema associated with retinal vein occlusion (RVO), including branch RVO (BRVO) and central RVO. However, not all eyes with resolved macular edema show satisfactory best corrected visual acuity. Photoreceptor impairment can mostly explain the vision loss in these cases. Photoreceptor damage can be caused by subretinal hemorrhage in the central fovea and hard exudates or their precursor derived from concentrated lipoproteins originating from leaky retinal vessel extravasation. The contribution of neuron impairment in the inner retina, including the impairment of bipolar and ganglion cells by ischemia, indicated by the presence of a non-perfusion area (NPA), to vision loss in eyes with BRVO is insignificant. This is because the papillomacular bundle area is usually spared from NPAs in BRVO cases.

Mystery of Retinal Vein Occlusion: Vasoactivity of the Vein and Possible Involvement of Endothelin-1

Retinal vein occlusion (RVO) is a common vascular disease of retina; however, the pathomechanism leading to RVO is not yet clear. In general, increasing age, hypertension, arteriosclerosis, diabetes mellitus, dyslipidemia, cardiovascular disorder, and cerebral stroke are systemic risk factors of RVO. However, RVO often occur in the unilateral eye and sometimes develop in young subjects who have no arteriosclerosis. In addition, RVO show different variations on the degrees of severity; some RVO are resolved without any treatment and others develop vision-threatening complications such as macular edema, combined retinal artery occlusion, vitreous hemorrhage, and glaucoma. Clinical conditions leading to RVO are still open to question. In this review, we discuss how to treat RVO in practice by presenting some RVO cases. We also deliver possible pathomechanisms of RVO through our clinical experience and animal experiments.

New Developments in the Classification, Pathogenesis, Risk Factors, Natural History, and Treatment of Branch Retinal Vein Occlusion

For years, branch retinal vein occlusion is still a controversial disease in many aspects. An increasing amount of data is available regarding classification, pathogenesis, risk factors, natural history, and therapy of branch retinal vein occlusion. Some of the conclusions may even change our impression of branch retinal vein occlusion. It will be beneficial for our doctors to get a deeper understanding of this disease and improve the treatment skills. The aims of this review is to collect the information above and report new ideas especially from the past a few years.

Method of Quantifying Size of Retinal Hemorrhages in Eyes with Branch Retinal Vein Occlusion Using 14-Square Grid: Interrater and Intrarater Reliability

Purpose. To describe a method of quantifying the size of the retinal hemorrhages in branch retinal vein occlusion (BRVO) and to determine the interrater and intrarater reliabilities of these measurements. Methods. Thirty-five fundus photographs from 35 consecutive eyes with BRVO were studied. The fundus images were analyzed with Power-Point® software, and a grid of 14 squares was laid over the fundus image. Raters were asked to judge the percentage of each of the 14 squares that was covered by the hemorrhages, and the average of the 14 squares was taken to be the relative size of the retinal hemorrhage. Results. Interrater reliability between three raters was higher when a grid with 14 squares was used (intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC), 0.96) than that when a box with no grid was used (ICC, 0.78). Intrarater reliability, which was calculated by the retinal hemorrhage area measured on two different days, was also higher (ICC, 0.97) than that with no grid (ICC, 0.86). Interrater reliability for five fundus pictures with poor image quality was also good when a grid with 14 squares was used (ICC, 0.88). Conclusions. Although our method is subjective, excellent interrater and intrarater reliabilities indicate that this method can be adapted for clinical use.