Factors Influencing Intraocular Pressure Changes after Laser In Situ Keratomileusis with Flaps Created by Femtosecond Laser or Mechanical Microkeratome

Predictive models for IOPs measured with NCT, GAT, and ORA among patients undergoing SMILE

Purpose: To develop predictive models for the intraocular pressure (IOP) of patients undergoing small incision lenticule extraction (SMILE) procedures, measured with a noncontact tonometer (NCT), Goldmann applanation tonometry (GAT), and an ocular response analyzer (ORA). Methods: In this prospective study, a total of 104 eyes (-6.23 ± 2.06 diopters) of 52 patients (24.38 ± 4.76 years) undergoing SMILE procedures were included. The intraocular pressure was measured (IOPNCT with NCT, IOPGAT with GAT, and IOPcc and IOPg with ORA) before surgery and at postoperative 6 months. Information on age, preoperative and attempted spherical equivalent (SE), ablation depth, preoperative values and postoperative changes in central corneal thickness (CCT), K1, K2, Km, corneal hysteresis (CH) and corneal resistance factor (CRF) values was collected in order to predict IOPs. Results: All surgeries were uneventful. At postoperative 6 months, the efficacy and safety index were 1.04 ± 0.15 and 1.08 ± 0.18, respectively. Significant decreases were detected in postoperative IOPNCT, IOPGAT, IOPcc, and IOPg compared to preoperative values (all p < 0.001). No relationship was found between any IOP and ablation depth, attempted SE, and preoperative SE, as well as CCTdifference (all p > 0.05). Predictive models for IOPs were constructed to predict preoperative values, and R 2 values were 67.5% (IOPNCT), 64.5% (IOPGAT), 78.7% (IOPcc), and 82.0% (IOPg). The prediction band of IOPNCT and IOPGAT was 7.4-15.1 mmHg and 8-16 mmHg, respectively. Conclusion: Predictive models for IOP measurements after SMILE procedures can be helpful in clinical practice.

Intraocular pressure after myopic laser refractive surgery measured with a new Goldmann convex prism: correlations with GAT and ORA

Background

The purpose of this study is to describe measurements using a newly developed modified Goldmann convex tonometer (CT) 1 year after myopic laser refractive surgery. Intraocular pressure (IOP) measurements were compared with IOP values obtained by Goldmann applanation tonometer (GAT), and Ocular Response Analyzer (ORA).

Methods

Prospective double-masked study performed on thirty eyes of thirty patients that underwent laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK; n = 19) or photorefractive keratectomy (PRK; n = 11). IOP was measured before and 3 and 12 months after surgery. Intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) and Bland-Altman plot were calculated to assess the agreement between GAT, CT, IOPg (Goldmann-correlated IOP) and IOPcc (corneal-compensated IOP) from ORA.

Results

Twelve months after LASIK, IOP measured with CT showed the best correlation with IOP measured with GAT before surgery (GATpre) (ICC = 0.886, 95% CI: 0.703–0.956) (15.60 ± 3.27 vs 15.80 ± 3.22; p < 0.000). However, a moderate correlation was found for IOP measured with IOPcc and CT 12 months after LASIK (ICC = 0.568, 95% CI: − 0.185 – 0.843) (15.80 ± 3.22 vs 12.87 ± 2.77; p < 0.004). Twelve months after PRK, CT showed a weak correlation (ICC = − 0.266, 95% CI: − 3.896 – 0.663), compared to GATpre (17.30 ± 3.47 vs 16.01 ± 1.45; p < 0.642), as well as poor correlation (ICC = 0.256, 95% CI: − 0.332 – 0.719) with IOPcc (17.30 ± 3.47 vs 13.38 ± 1.65; p < 0.182).

Conclusions

Twelve months after LASIK, IOP measured with CT strongly correlated with GAT before surgery and could therefore provide an alternative method for measuring IOP after this surgery. More studies regarding this new convex prism are needed to assess its accuracy.

The effect of central corneal thickness on Goldmann tonometry: a retrospective study

PURPOSE

To determine the relation between central corneal thickness and intraocular pressure.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

This retrospective study investigated 112 eyes from 56 individuals who underwent photorefractive keratectomy in a single private medical center between May 2018 and September 2019. Intraocular pressure readings were obtained with Goldmann applanation tonometry, and central corneal thickness measurements were evaluated preoperatively. All the examinations were repeated at 3 and 6 months postoperative.

RESULTS

At 3 and 6 months postoperative, the mean intraocular pressure was only slightly reduced from baseline (mean reduction of 0.6 ± 2.0 mmHg, P < 0.001 and 0.73 ± 2.14 mmHg, P < 0.001, respectively). The change in intraocular pressure following photorefractive keratectomy was not clinically significant, and this change was not correlated with postoperative central corneal thickness at 3 months (p = 0.620, r = 0.047).

CONCLUSION

This study showed that the change in intraocular pressure following photorefractive keratectomy was not clinically significant, and ruled out a correlation in this context between the change in central corneal thickness and the delta intraocular pressure. Our results might question the axiom between central corneal thickness and intraocular pressure and may thus challenge the current clinical setting for evaluating glaucoma.

Reliability of Intraocular Pressure Measurement by Goldmann Applanation Tonometry After Refractive Surgery: A Review of Different Correction Formulas

Myopia is one of the main risk factors for the onset of open-angle glaucoma. One of the first steps to assess glaucoma occurrence is the measurement of the intraocular pressure (IOP) by the Goldmann applanation tonometry (GAT). Even if this device is considered to be the gold standard for such measurements, it is affected by several sources of errors. Among these, there are the corneal thickness and curvature, both modified by corneal refractive surgery (CRS), that nowadays has become a very popular method to treat refractive errors. Indeed, CRS, by modifying the corneal shape and structure, causes an underestimation of the IOP measurements. In the literature, several IOP correction formulas to utilize with different devices have been proposed to overcome this problem. This paper aims to review the various correction formulas applied to the GAT in the attempt to improve the reliability of this measurement.

Laser-assisted in-situ keratomileusis (LASIK) with a mechanical microkeratome compared to LASIK with a femtosecond laser for LASIK in adults with myopia or myopic astigmatism

BACKGROUND

Laser-assisted in-situ keratomileusis (LASIK) is a surgical procedure that corrects refractive errors. This technique creates a flap of the outermost parts of the cornea (epithelium, bowman layer, and anterior stroma) to expose the middle part of the cornea (stromal bed) and reshape it with excimer laser using photoablation. The flaps can be created by a mechanical microkeratome or a femtosecond laser.

OBJECTIVES

To compare the effectiveness and safety of mechanical microkeratome versus femtosecond laser in LASIK for adults with myopia.

SEARCH METHODS

We searched CENTRAL (which contains the Cochrane Eyes and Vision Trials Register) (2019, Issue 2); Ovid MEDLINE; Embase; PubMed; LILACS; ClinicalTrials.gov and the World Health Organization (WHO) International Clinical Trials Registry Platform (ICTRP). We used no date or language restrictions. We searched the reference lists of included trials. We searched the electronic databases on 22 February 2019.

SELECTION CRITERIA

We included randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of LASIK with a mechanical microkeratome compared to a femtosecond laser in people aged 18 years or older with more than 0.5 diopters of myopia or myopic astigmatism.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

We used standard methodological procedures expected by Cochrane.

MAIN RESULTS

We included 16 records from 11 trials enrolling 943 adults (1691 eyes) with spherical or spherocylindrical myopia, who were suitable candidates for LASIK. Five hundred and forty-seven participants (824 eyes) received LASIK with a mechanical microkeratome and 588 participants (867 eyes) with a femtosecond laser. Each trial included between nine and 360 participants. In six trials, the same participants received both interventions. Overall, the trials were at an uncertain risk of bias for most domains. At 12 months, data from one trial (42 eyes) indicates no difference in the mean uncorrected visual acuity (logMAR scale) between LASIK with a mechanical microkeratome and LASIK with a femtosecond laser (mean difference (MD) -0.01, 95% confidence interval (CI) -0.06 to 0.04; low-certainty evidence). Similar findings were observed at 12 months after surgery, regarding participants achieving 0.5 diopters within target refraction (risk ratio (RR) 0.97, 95% CI 0.85 to 1.11; 1 trial, 79 eyes; low-certainty evidence) as well as mean spherical equivalent of the refractive error 12 months after surgery (MD 0.09, 95% CI -0.01 to 0.19; 3 trials, 168 eyes [92 participants]; low-certainty evidence). Based on data from three trials (134 eyes, 66 participants), mechanical microkeratome was associated with lower risk of diffuse lamellar keratitis compared with femtosecond laser (RR 0.27, 95% CI 0.10 to 0.78; low-certainty evidence). Thus, diffuse lamellar keratitis was a more common adverse event with femtosecond laser than with mechanical microkeratome, decreasing from an assumed rate of 209 per 1000 people in the femtosecond laser group to 56 per 1000 people in the mechanical microkeratome group. Data from one trial (183 eyes, 183 participants) indicates that dry eye as an adverse event may be more common with mechanical microkeratome than with femtosecond laser, increasing from an assumed rate of 80 per 1000 people in the femtosecond laser group to 457 per 1000 people in the mechanical microkeratome group (RR 5.74, 95% CI 2.92 to 11.29; low-certainty evidence). There was no evidence of a difference between the two groups for corneal haze (RR 0.33, 95% CI 0.01 to 7.96; 1 trial, 43 eyes) and epithelial ingrowth (RR 1.04, 95% CI 0.11 to 9.42; 2 trials, 102 eyes [50 participants]). The certainty of evidence for both outcomes was very low.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

Regarding the visual acuity outcomes, there may be no difference between LASIK with mechanical microkeratome and LASIK with femtosecond laser. Dry eye and diffuse lamellar keratitis are likely adverse events with mechanical microkeratome and femtosecond laser, respectively. The evidence is uncertain regarding corneal haze and epithelial ingrowth as adverse events of each intervention. The limited number of outcomes reported in the included trials, some with potentially significant risk of bias, makes it difficult to draw a firm conclusion regarding the effectiveness and safety of the interventions investigated in this review.

Intraocular Pressure Calculation in Myopic Patients After Laser-Assisted In Situ Keratomileusis

Background

Corneal refractive surgery is widely used worldwide. Myopia is the most common reason for laser-assisted corneal refractive surgery (LASIK) and one of the risk factors for glaucoma. Intraocular pressure (IOP) measurement becomes variable postoperatively as the results are affected by the decrease in corneal thickness and biomechanics. This prospective clinical case study attempted to establish a simple correction formula for the calculation of IOP in post-LASIK myopic patients.

Methods

This study included 300 eyes of 150 patients with myopia and myopic astigmatism as a refractive error who underwent LASIK. IOP was measured preoperatively and 6 months postoperatively. Preoperative and postoperative corneal thickness as well as ablation depth were measured. Statistical analysis was performed to detect the relationship between ablation depth and change in IOP. An attempt was made to construct a correction formula for the calculation of post-LASIK IOP.

Results

The age of the patients ranged between 18 and 50 (mean ± SD 34.78±8.8) years. The spherical equivalent of refractive error ranged between -1.5 and -10 diopters. The mean IOP decreased significantly from 15.72±2.37 mmHg preoperatively to 11.71±2.24 mmHg postoperatively, with a mean difference of 4±1.75 mmHg (p˂0.001). A positive correlation was detected between corneal thickness and IOP difference among patients both preoperatively and postoperatively (p˂0.001). A positive correlation was identified between ablation depth and IOP change (p˂0.001). The correction formula for IOP was established: Real IOP=4+0.7(preoperative IOP)-0.3(ablation depth).

Conclusion

IOP measurements change after corneal refractive surgery with LASIK. A corrected formula may be a good option for the proper calculation of post-LASIK IOP.

Finite element simulation of Goldmann tonometry after refractive surgery

BACKGROUND

The problem of accuracy of intraocular pressure (IOP) measurement using Goldmann Applanation Tonometry (GAT) after a refractive surgery is still unresolved. In this study a numerical simulation of refractive surgery and GAT is proposed as a method to evaluate accuracy of the correction formula for GAT reading after changes in corneal curvature and thickness.

METHODS

In the finite element analysis the effect of the corneal shell buckling was taken into account. This effect is responsible for the nonlinear relation of Goldmann applanation tonometer measurement and intraocular pressure. Goldmann applanation tonometry was simulated for different ablation depths and values of intraocular pressure levels.

FINDINGS

The results of the simulation indicate a strong relation between the Goldmann applanation reading and the intraocular pressure level for values greater than nominal (about 16 mmHg). The estimation error of the intraocular pressure after changes in corneal geometry, is lower than 1 mmHg for IOP = 32 mmHg and lower than 3 mmHg for IOP = 48 mmHg.

INTERPRETATION

The proposed correction formula of Goldmann applanation tonometry occurred to be useful in the cases after the corneal refractive surgery regardless of the intraocular pressure values and ablation depth.

Intraocular Pressure After Corneal Refractive Surgery

Introduction:

Laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK), a refractive surgery procedure is being performed in a large number among people with refractive errors. In all the people undergoing the procedure, there is a potential risk to misdiagnose the glaucoma disease due to changes in central corneal thickness (CCT). In subjects who have undergone laser refractive interventions, intraocular tension may be lower and underestimated, and this can lead to later detection of glaucoma.

Aim:

The objective of this study was to analyze the intraocular pressure (IOP) after LASIK in patients with myopia.

Methods:

Thirty-seven patients underwent LASIK intervention to treat myopia. In total, 74 eyes were treated. Before the intervention, all patients underwent complete ophthalmologic examination, including the measurement of central corneal thickness (CCT) and measurement of IOP with non-contact tonometer. The IOP was also measured on days 1, 3 and 30 after the surgery. The mean IOP was taken for statistical analysis.

Results:

Seventy-four eyes of 37 patients (mean age 31.6) underwent LASIK intervention to treat myopia. Mean CCT before the intervention was 551.9 ±31.9µm, while mean postoperative CCT was 469.8 ±45.3µm (p<0.0001). Mean preoperative IOP was 16.4mmHg while mean postoperative IOP was 11.0mmHg (p<0.0001). The average spherical equivalent was -5.9 diopters.

Conclusions:

The reduction of IOP after LASIK refractive surgery is significant. This reduction is about 1mmHg per 1 diopter. This should be taken into account in the future in these patients because, due to the underestimation of the IOP, the glaucoma disease may be overlooked.

Considerations for refractive surgery in the glaucoma patient

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Given the popularity of keratorefractive surgery, and an aging populous of patients who have undergone these procedures, there is an increasing need for updated management protocols. This is particularly relevant for patients with chronic progressive diseases such as glaucoma, due to the variety of related diagnostic and management challenges inherent to these diseases. Here, we will review the current literature to provide an update on the management of patients with glaucoma who are undergoing, or have had laser ablative refractive surgery. Preoperative testing and eligibility considerations, intraoperative factors, and postoperative observation and follow-up will be discussed.

RECENT FINDINGS

Intraoperative intraocular pressure (IOP) rise during flap creation is associated with low risk of acute complications, and furthermore do not appear to have significant long term effects. Modern technologies have improved our ability to determine accurate IOP after refractive surgery despite postoperative changes in corneal architecture. Furthermore, advances in structural imaging allow for earlier detection of even subtle glaucomatous nerve damage.

SUMMARY

Although glaucoma remains a relative contraindication to refractive surgery, it is a safe procedure for many patients with appropriate perioperative management and follow-up. Advancements in diagnostic modalities have allowed for earlier detection of glaucomatous disease, and subsequent earlier intervention when appropriate. Standardized diagnostic algorithms and rigorous perioperative assessment are critical to safe management of glaucoma patients undergoing refractive corneal surgery.