The Ratio of ADP- to TRAP-Induced Platelet Aggregation Quantifies P2Y12-Dependent Platelet Inhibition Independently of the Platelet Count

Time from blood draw to multiple electrode aggregometry and association with platelet reactivity

Results from multiple electrode aggregometry (MEA) may vary according to pre-analytic factors. This study aimed to analyze the association of time from blood draw to MEA in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). In this observational single-center cohort study, platelet aggregation (aggregation units, U) was quantified by MEA (Multiplate Analyzer) after stimulation with adenosine diphosphate (ADP; final concentration [Fc] 6.4 μM), thrombin receptor activating peptide (TRAP; Fc 32 μM), or arachidonic acid (AA; Fc 0.5 mM) in patients treated with ASA and clopidogrel following PCI. High on-clopidogrel platelet reactivity (HPR) was defined as ADP-induced platelet aggregation ≥ 46 U. The manufacturer recommends performing the analysis within 30-180 min after blood draw. Patients were grouped according to the time from blood draw to MEA: 30-180 min, < 30 min, or > 180 min. Platelet function of 273 patients with coronary artery disease undergoing PCI with dual antiplatelet therapy was analyzed. The median age was 72 years (interquartile range, IQR 62-79) and 179 (66%) were male. Median ADP-, TRAP-, and AA-induced aggregation was 25 (IQR 18-36) U, 79 (IQR 63-96) U, and 12 (IQR 7-18) U, respectively. For those analyzed within 30-180 min from blood draw, no significant correlation of time from blood draw to MEA was observed 1) ADP (r = - 0.04, p = 0.51); 2) TRAP (r = - 0.06, p = 0.32); 3) AA (r = - 0.03, p = 0.67). In patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention and treated with dual antiplatelet therapy, the time from blood draw to multiple electrode aggregometry does not correlate with ADP- induced aggregation when the measurement occurred within the recommended time interval of 30-180 min after blood draw.

Independent association of PCSK9 with platelet reactivity in subjects without statin or antiplatelet agents

Background and aims

Proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9 (PCSK9) levels could predict cardiovascular event in patients with well-controlled LDL-C levels, suggesting an LDL-independent mechanism of PCSK9 on the cardiovascular system. Accumulating evidence suggests PCSK9 might be associated with increased platelet reactivity. This study aimed to assess the relationship between PCSK9 levels and platelet reactivity in subjects not taking statins or antiplatelet agents.

Methods

A cross-sectional study was conducted to investigate the independent contribution of PCSK9 to platelet activity by controlling for the potential confounding factors. The study population included 89 subjects from a health examination centre who underwent routine annual health check-ups or had an examination before a selective operation. Subjects taking statins or antiplatelet agents were excluded. Adenosine diphosphate (ADP)-induced platelet aggregation was determined by PL-11 platelet analyzer using impedance aggregometry and plasma PCSK9 levels were determined using an ELISA. Serum Lipid profile was assessed by measuring the concentration of total cholesterol (TC), high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C), and triglyceride (TG), with low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) being directly measured using enzymatic techniques. The association between PCSK9 and platelet reactivity was investigated.

Results

The study subjects were composed of 53 males and 36 females with an average age of 55 (±11) years old. The univariate correlation analysis showed significant correlation between ADP-induced maximal aggregation rate (MAR) and PCSK9 (r = 0.55, p < 0.001) as well as TC (r = 0.23, p = 0.028), LDL-C (r = 0.27, p < 0.001), and PLT (r = 0.31, p = 0.005). Being male (41.2% vs. 46.6, p = 0.04) and smoking (37.4 vs. 46.2%, p = 0.016) were associated with lower ADP-induced MAR than being female and non-smoking. However, there is no correlation between PCSK9 and AA-induced platelet maximal aggregation rate (r = 0.17, p = 0.12). Multiple regression analysis suggested that PCSK9 contributed independently to ADP-induced maximal aggregation rate (β = 0.08, p = 0.004) after controlling for the effect of TC, LDL-C, PLT, being male, and smoking.

Conclusions

PCSK9 is positively associated with platelet reactivity, which may partly account for the beneficial effect of PCSK9 inhibition in reducing the risk of major adverse cardiovascular events after acute coronary syndrome (ACS).

Clinical Significance of Thrombin Blockade with Low Doses (2.5 mg) of Rivaroxaban in Ischemic Heart Disease Patients

Arterial thrombosis is a result of complex interaction between blood cells, soluble coagulation factors in plasma and vessel wall. Antiplatelet drugs do not always provide the necessary antithrombotic effect of sufficient strength, because their influence does not extend to all three factors involved in this process. Low doses of direct oral inhibitors of thrombin are able to potentiate antithrombotic effect of antiplatelet therapy. The combination of rivaroxaban in a dose of 2.5 mg and standard double antiplatelet therapy turned out to be the most promising for clinical use, since studies with dabigatran and apixaban at the II and III stages of the trials were found to be unsuccessful due to the unacceptably high frequency of bleeding. Studies of the combination of rivaroxaban at a dose of 2.5 mg and standard antiplatelet therapy conducted in previous years among patients with acute myocardial infarction showed a decrease in the frequency of complications of atherothrombosis associated with their ischemic nature, while at the same time there was a slight increase in hemorrhagic complications. In the COMPASS study the combination of rivaroxaban (2.5 mg) plus aspirin reduced the risk of the primary endpoint (myocardial infarction, ischemic stroke, cardiovascular death) more significantly than aspirin alone in patients with stable ischemic heart disease and ischemic brain disease. The pathophysiological rationales for the use of low doses of rivaroxaban when added to dual antiplatelet therapy are considered, and the significance of recent studies in patients with acute coronary syndrome, stable ischemic heart disease and in the prevention of ischemic stroke is discussed.

Metamizole inhibits arachidonic acid-induced platelet aggregation after surgery and impairs the effect of aspirin in hospitalized patients

PURPOSE

The inhibitory effect of metamizole on platelet aggregation is known for several years, but most studies were conducted in healthy volunteers with contradictory results. Recent studies have shown an inhibitory effect of metamizole on acetylsalicylic acid (ASA)-induced platelet aggregation. We aimed to investigate the effect of metamizole on platelet aggregation after an elective surgery and the effect of metamizole on ASA-induced platelet aggregation in hospitalized patients.

METHODS

We performed platelet aggregation analysis after induction with ADP, arachidonic acid (AA), epinephrine, and collagen in 37 patients prior to an elective visceral or thoracic surgery and on postoperative day (POD) 1 and POD 3 1-2 h and 5-6 h after metamizole. In another cohort of 10 hospitalized patients receiving the combination of metamizole and ASA for more than 7 days, AA-induced platelet aggregation was analyzed in the morning prior to the intake of both drugs.

RESULTS

Metamizole induced a strong inhibitory effect on AA-induced platelet aggregation at all time points being detectable up to 41 h in some patients. Besides a less pronounced effect on collagen-induced platelet aggregation on POD 3 1-2 h after metamizole, all other inductors showed no effect. In 4 out of 10 hospitalized patients, no ASA-induced inhibition of platelet aggregation was detectable without correlation to sequence of administration.

CONCLUSIONS

The reason why some patients have a long-lasting inhibitory effect of metamizole on COX-induced platelet aggregation that might interfere with ASA should be investigated in a larger cohort of patients.

High platelet reactivity after P2Y12-inhibition in patients with atrial fibrillation and coronary stenting

High platelet reactivity (HPR) after P2Y12-inhibition in patients undergoing coronary stenting is associated with an increased risk for thromboembolic events and coronary death. So far it is not known how HPR affects the clinical outcome of different treatment strategies in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) undergoing coronary stenting. In this single centre, observational study the antiplatelet effect of P2Y12-inhibitors in AF patients undergoing coronary stenting was investigated using impedance aggregometry. Patients received either dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) or triple therapy (TT). HPR was defined as the ratio of ADP-to TRAP-induced aggregation (r-ADP-agg) ≥50 %. Thromboembolic and bleeding events were assessed within the first 30 days after stenting. Out of 910 screened patients 167 patients were available for the present analysis. HPR was found in 5 of 43 (12 %) patients treated with DAPT and in 18 of 124 (15 %) patients treated with TT. In patients receiving TT, HPR was not a risk factor for thromboembolic events compared to patients with adequate response to P2Y12-inhibitors (6 vs. 8 %, p = 0.712). There was a trend for less bleeding events in patients with HPR compared to r-ADP-agg <50 % in the TT group (0 vs. 16 %, p = 0.077). Our data suggest that HPR after P2Y12-antagonism in patients receiving TT due to AF and coronary stenting might protect from bleeding without increasing thromboembolic risk. Future studies will need to investigate if patients with AF receiving coronary stenting benefit from a reduction of antithrombotic therapy.