1
|
Aye PS, Win SS, Tin Tin S, Elwood JM. Comparison of Cancer Mortality and Incidence Between New Zealand and Australia and Reflection on Differences in Cancer Care: An Ecological Cross-Sectional Study of 2014-2018. Cancer Control 2023; 30:10732748231152330. [PMID: 37150819 PMCID: PMC10170599 DOI: 10.1177/10732748231152330] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/09/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Despite many background similarities, New Zealand showed excess cancer deaths compared to Australia in previous studies. This study extends this comparison using the most recent data of 2014-2018. METHODS This study used publicly available cancer mortality and incidence data of New Zealand Ministry of Health and Australian Institute of Health and Welfare, and resident population data of Statistics New Zealand. Australian cancer mortality and incidence rates were applied to New Zealand population, by site of cancer, year, age and sex, to estimate the expected numbers, which were compared with the New Zealand observed numbers. RESULTS For total cancers in 2014-2018, New Zealand had 780 excess deaths in women (17.1% of the annual total 4549; 95% confidence interval (CI) 15.8-18.4%), and 281 excess deaths in men (5.5% of the annual total 5105; 95% CI 4.3-6.7%) compared to Australia. The excess was contributed by many major cancers including colorectal, melanoma, and stomach cancer in both sexes; lung, uterine, and breast cancer in women, and prostate cancer in men. New Zealand's total cancer incidences were lower than those expected from Australia's in both women and men: average annual difference of 419 cases (-3.6% of the annual total 11 505; 95% CI -4.5 to -2.8%), and 1485 (-11.7% of the annual total 12 669; 95% CI -12.5 to -10.9%), respectively. Comparing time periods, the excesses in total cancer deaths in women were 15.1% in 2000-07, and 17.5% in 1996-1997; and in men 4.7% in 2000-2007 and 5.6% in 1996-1997. The differences by time period were non-significant. CONCLUSION Excess mortality from all cancers combined and several common cancers in New Zealand, compared to Australia, persisted in 2014-2018, being similar to excesses in 2000-2007 and 1996-1997. It cannot be explained by differences in incidence, but may be attributable to various aspects of health systems governance and performance.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Phyu Sin Aye
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand
| | - Shwe Sin Win
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand
| | - Sandar Tin Tin
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand
| | - J Mark Elwood
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Tuo JY, Bi JH, Yuan HY, Jiang YF, Ji XW, Li HL, Xiang YB. Trends of stomach cancer survival: A systematic review of survival rates from population-based cancer registration. J Dig Dis 2022; 23:22-32. [PMID: 34821032 DOI: 10.1111/1751-2980.13070] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/28/2021] [Revised: 09/14/2021] [Accepted: 11/22/2021] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES We aimed to describe the pattern and time trends of survival from stomach cancer worldwide from population-based cancer registers. METHODS A systematic search of PubMed, Web of Science, EMBASE, SEER and SinoMed for articles published up to 31 December 2020 was conducted. All eligible survival analyses of stomach cancer were collected and evaluated by countries or regions, periods, sex and age groups. RESULTS Our review included 76 articles on stomach cancer survival rates and found that these rates had improved globally with time, although this increase was unremarkable. The highest 5-year survival rate of 72.1% was observed in Japan (2004-2007). The 5-year relative and net survival, rates were relatively high in Korea and Japan, while they were fairly poor in Africa and India. Sex-specific survival rates were higher in women than in men in America, Europe and Oceania, whereas they were relatively low in Asia. The poorest age-specific 5-year relative and net survival rates were observed in patients aged over 75 years. CONCLUSIONS Over the past decades, patient prognosis of stomach cancer has gradually improved worldwide and survival rates in developed regions were higher than those in developing regions. White men and Asian women had a poorer survival than white women and Asian men. Younger patients had better survival rates than those aged over 75 years globally.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jia Yi Tuo
- School of Public Health, Shanghai Jiaotong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China.,State Key Laboratory of Oncogene and Related Genes and Department of Epidemiology, Shanghai Cancer Institute, Renji Hospital, Shanghai Jiaotong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China
| | - Jing Hao Bi
- School of Public Health, Shanghai Jiaotong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China.,State Key Laboratory of Oncogene and Related Genes and Department of Epidemiology, Shanghai Cancer Institute, Renji Hospital, Shanghai Jiaotong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China
| | - Hui Yun Yuan
- Renji Hospital, Shanghai Jiaotong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China
| | - Yu Fei Jiang
- School of Public Health, Shanghai Jiaotong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China.,State Key Laboratory of Oncogene and Related Genes and Department of Epidemiology, Shanghai Cancer Institute, Renji Hospital, Shanghai Jiaotong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China.,Renji Hospital, Shanghai Jiaotong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China
| | - Xiao Wei Ji
- School of Public Health, Shanghai Jiaotong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China.,State Key Laboratory of Oncogene and Related Genes and Department of Epidemiology, Shanghai Cancer Institute, Renji Hospital, Shanghai Jiaotong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China
| | - Hong Lan Li
- State Key Laboratory of Oncogene and Related Genes and Department of Epidemiology, Shanghai Cancer Institute, Renji Hospital, Shanghai Jiaotong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China
| | - Yong Bing Xiang
- School of Public Health, Shanghai Jiaotong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China.,State Key Laboratory of Oncogene and Related Genes and Department of Epidemiology, Shanghai Cancer Institute, Renji Hospital, Shanghai Jiaotong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China.,Renji Hospital, Shanghai Jiaotong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
McKeage MJ, Tin Tin S, Khwaounjoo P, Sheath K, Dixon-McIver A, Ng D, Sullivan R, Cameron L, Shepherd P, Laking GR, Kingston N, Strauss M, Lewis C, Elwood M, Love DR. Screening for anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) gene rearrangements in non-small-cell lung cancer in New Zealand. Intern Med J 2021; 50:716-725. [PMID: 31318119 DOI: 10.1111/imj.14435] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/06/2019] [Revised: 06/21/2019] [Accepted: 07/09/2019] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Lung cancer is a major cause of death in New Zealand. In recent years, targeted therapies have improved outcomes. AIM To determine the uptake of anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) testing, and the prevalence, demographic profile and outcomes of ALK-positive non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC), in New Zealand, where no national ALK-testing guidelines or subsidised ALK tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) therapies are available. METHODS A population-based observational study reviewed databases to identify patients presenting with non-squamous NSCLC over 6.5 years in northern New Zealand. We report the proportion tested for ALK gene rearrangements and the results. NSCLC samples tested by fluorescence in situ hybridisation were retested by next generation sequencing and ALK immunohistochemistry. A survival analysis compared ALK-positive patients treated or not treated with ALK TKI therapy. RESULTS From a total of 3130 patients diagnosed with non-squamous NSCLC, 407 (13%) were tested for ALK gene rearrangements, and patient selection was variable and inequitable. Among those tested, 34 (8.4%) had ALK-positive NSCLC. ALK-positive disease was more prevalent in younger versus older patients, non-smokers versus smokers and in Māori, Pacific or Asian ethnic groups than in New Zealand Europeans. Fluorescence in situ hybridisation, ALK immunohistochemistry and next generation sequencing showed broad concordance for detecting ALK-positive disease under local testing conditions. Among patients with ALK-positive metastatic NSCLC, those treated with ALK TKI survived markedly longer than those not treated with ALK TKI (median overall survival 5.12 vs 0.55 years). CONCLUSION Lung cancer outcomes in New Zealand may be improved by providing national guidelines and funding policy for ALK testing and access to subsidised ALK TKI therapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mark J McKeage
- Department of Pharmacology and Clinical Pharmacology and the Auckland Cancer Society Research Centre Auckland, University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand.,Medical Oncology, Auckland City Hospital, Auckland, New Zealand
| | - Sandar Tin Tin
- Section of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand
| | - Prashannata Khwaounjoo
- Department of Pharmacology and Clinical Pharmacology, University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand
| | - Karen Sheath
- Diagnostic Genetics, LabPLUS, Auckland City Hospital, Auckland, New Zealand
| | | | | | | | - Laird Cameron
- Medical Oncology, Auckland City Hospital, Auckland, New Zealand
| | - Philip Shepherd
- School of Medical Sciences, University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand
| | - George R Laking
- Medical Oncology, Auckland City Hospital, Auckland, New Zealand
| | - Nicola Kingston
- Anatomical Pathology, LabPLUS, Auckland City Hospital, Auckland, New Zealand
| | - Magreet Strauss
- Anatomical Pathology, LabPLUS, Auckland City Hospital, Auckland, New Zealand
| | | | - Mark Elwood
- Section of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand
| | - Donald R Love
- Diagnostic Genetics, LabPLUS, Auckland City Hospital, Auckland, New Zealand.,Pathology Genetics, Sidra Medicine, Doha, Qatar
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Utilisation and Determinants of Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor Mutation Testing in Patients with Non-small Cell Lung Cancer in Routine Clinical Practice: A Global Systematic Review. Target Oncol 2021; 15:279-299. [PMID: 32445082 DOI: 10.1007/s11523-020-00718-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutation testing is recommended for selecting patients with non-squamous non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) for EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitor drug treatment. OBJECTIVE The objective of this article was to systematically review available evidence on the utilisation and determinants of EGFR mutation testing of patients with NSCLC in routine clinical practice. PATIENTS AND METHODS Searches were made of five electronic databases (Web of Science, MEDLINE [Ovid], Science Direct, EMBASE and Scopus), bibliographies of relevant articles, studies that cited included studies and relevant cancer websites. Studies were included if they: (1) reported the rate of uptake of EGFR testing in patients with NSCLC; (2) were conducted in routine clinical practice settings; (3) were published in English prior to July 2017; and (4) had full text available. Studies were appraised using the STROBE and the National Institutes of Health (National Heart, Lung and Blood Institute) checklists. RESULTS Eighteen eligible studies were identified for this systematic review, published between 2011 and 2017, from the USA (n = 7), Canada (n = 2), Republic of Korea (n = 2), Norway (n = 1), Sweden (n = 1), Germany (n = 1), Spain (n = 1), New Zealand (n = 1), China (n = 1) and multiple countries from the Asia-Pacific region (n = 1). Overall, testing for EGFR mutations was undertaken in 16,146 of 52,257 study patients (31%), although testing rates varied widely between different studies (from 7.8% to 78.3%). Single institution retrospective audits reported higher rates of testing (median 65.7%, range 31.3-78.3%) than population-based retrospective cohort analyses (median 23%, range 11-69%) and multi-institutional cross-sectional practitioner surveys (median 19.8%, range 7.8-31.8%). Nine studies reported increasing rates of testing over the study period but maximum testing rates remained less than 75% in most studies. Factors associated with higher testing uptake rates included: female sex; younger age; former/no smoking; advanced stage of lung cancer; adenocarcinoma histology; better mobility; radiation therapy; available tissue specimen; and private insurance. Among 16,146 tested patients, EGFR mutations were detected in 4328 patients (26.8%). However, estimates of mutation prevalence were biased by incomplete and selective testing in many studies. CONCLUSIONS The uptake of EGFR mutation testing of patients with NSCLC is suboptimal in many parts of the world. Incomplete uptake of testing is fuelled by selective testing referral practices, sample limitations, and funding constraints.
Collapse
|
5
|
Lao C, Lees D, Patel S, White D, Lawrenson R. Geographical and ethnic differences of osteoarthritis-associated hip and knee replacement surgeries in New Zealand: a population-based cross-sectional study. BMJ Open 2019; 9:e032993. [PMID: 31542769 PMCID: PMC6756428 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-032993] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/06/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To (1) explore the regional and ethnic differences in rates of publicly funded osteoarthritis-associated hip and knee replacement surgeries and (2) investigate the mortality after surgery. DESIGN Population-based, retrospective, cross-sectional study. SETTING General population in New Zealand. PARTICIPANTS Patients with osteoarthritis who underwent publicly funded primary hip and knee replacement surgeries in 2005-2017. Patients aged 14-99 years were included. PRIMARY AND SECONDARY OUTCOME MEASURES Age-standardised rate, standardised mortality ratio (SMR) and 30 days, 90 days and 1 year mortality. RESULTS We identified 53 439 primary hip replacements and 50 072 primary knee replacements with a diagnosis of osteoarthritis. The number and age-standardised rates of hip and knee replacements increased over time. Māori had the highest age-standardised rate of hip replacements, followed by European/others and Pacific, and Asian had the lowest rate. Pacific had the highest age-standardised rate of knee replacements, followed by Māori and European/others, and Asian had the lowest rate. The Northern Health Network had the lowest rate of hip surgeries, and the Southern Health Network had the lowest rate of knee surgeries. The SMRs of patients undergoing hip and knee replacements were lower than the general population: 0.92 (95% CI 0.89 to 0.95) for hip and 0.79 (95% CI 0.76 to 0.82) for knee. The SMRs were decreasing over time. The patterns of 30 days, 90 days and 1 year mortality were similar to the SMR. CONCLUSIONS The numbers of publicly funded osteoarthritis-associated primary hip and knee replacements are steadily increasing. Māori people had the highest age-standardised rate of hip replacements and Pacific people had the highest rate of knee replacements. The Northern Health Network had the lowest rate of hip surgeries, and the Southern Health Network had the lowest rate of knee surgeries. Compared with the general population, patients who had hip and knee replacements have a better life expectancy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Chunhuan Lao
- Waikato Medical Research Centre, University of Waikato, Hamilton, New Zealand
| | - David Lees
- Orthopaedic Department, Tauranga Hospital, Tauranga, New Zealand
| | - Sandeep Patel
- Orthopaedic Department, Waikato Hospital, Hamilton, New Zealand
| | - Douglas White
- Rheumatology Department, Waikato District Health Board, Hamilton, New Zealand
- Waikato Clinical School, The University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand
| | - Ross Lawrenson
- Waikato Medical Research Centre, University of Waikato, Hamilton, New Zealand
- Strategy and Funding, Waikato District Health Board, Hamilton, New Zealand
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Lipworth W, Kerridge I, Ghinea N, Zalcberg J. Clearing the air: towards agreement about access to high cost cancer medicines. Ann Oncol 2019; 30:143-146. [PMID: 30339243 DOI: 10.1093/annonc/mdy459] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- W Lipworth
- Sydney Health Ethics, University of Sydney, Sydney.
| | - I Kerridge
- Sydney Health Ethics, University of Sydney, Sydney; Department of Haematology, Royal North Shore Hospital, Sydney
| | - N Ghinea
- Sydney Health Ethics, University of Sydney, Sydney
| | - J Zalcberg
- School of Public Health & Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Schlemmer HP, Bittencourt LK, D’Anastasi M, Domingues R, Khong PL, Lockhat Z, Muellner A, Reiser MF, Schilsky RL, Hricak H. Global Challenges for Cancer Imaging. J Glob Oncol 2018; 4:1-10. [PMID: 30241164 PMCID: PMC6180759 DOI: 10.1200/jgo.17.00036] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/11/2022] Open
Abstract
Imaging plays many essential roles in nearly all aspects of high-quality cancer care. However, challenges to the delivery of optimal cancer imaging in both developing and advanced countries are manifold. Developing countries typically face dramatic shortages of both imaging equipment and general radiologists, and efforts to improve cancer imaging in these countries are often complicated by poor infrastructure, cultural barriers, and other obstacles. In advanced countries, on the other hand, although imaging equipment and general radiologists are typically accessible, the complexity of oncologic imaging and the need for subspecialists in the field are largely unrecognized; as a result, training opportunities are lacking, and there is a shortage of radiologists with the necessary subspecialty expertise to provide optimal cancer care and participate in advanced clinical research. This article is intended to raise awareness of these challenges and catalyze further efforts to address them. Some promising strategies and ongoing efforts are reviewed, and some specific actions are proposed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Heinz-Peter Schlemmer
- Heinz-Peter Schlemmer, German Cancer Research Center,
Heidelberg; Melvin D’Anastasi and Maximilian F.
Reiser, Ludwig-Maximilians-University Hospital, Munich, Germany;
Leonardo K. Bittencourt, Fluminense Federal University,
Niterói; Leonardo K. Bittencourt and Romeu
Domingues, Clínica de Diagnóstico por Imagem
(CDPI/Dasa), Rio de Janeiro, Brazil; Pek-Lan Khong, University of
Hong Kong, Queen Mary Hospital, Hong Kong, China; Zarina Lockhat,
University of Pretoria, Steve Biko Academic Hospital, Pretoria, South Africa;
Ada Muellner and Hedvig Hricak, Memorial Sloan
Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY; and Richard L. Schilsky,
American Society of Clinical Oncology, Alexandria, VA
| | - Leonardo K. Bittencourt
- Heinz-Peter Schlemmer, German Cancer Research Center,
Heidelberg; Melvin D’Anastasi and Maximilian F.
Reiser, Ludwig-Maximilians-University Hospital, Munich, Germany;
Leonardo K. Bittencourt, Fluminense Federal University,
Niterói; Leonardo K. Bittencourt and Romeu
Domingues, Clínica de Diagnóstico por Imagem
(CDPI/Dasa), Rio de Janeiro, Brazil; Pek-Lan Khong, University of
Hong Kong, Queen Mary Hospital, Hong Kong, China; Zarina Lockhat,
University of Pretoria, Steve Biko Academic Hospital, Pretoria, South Africa;
Ada Muellner and Hedvig Hricak, Memorial Sloan
Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY; and Richard L. Schilsky,
American Society of Clinical Oncology, Alexandria, VA
| | - Melvin D’Anastasi
- Heinz-Peter Schlemmer, German Cancer Research Center,
Heidelberg; Melvin D’Anastasi and Maximilian F.
Reiser, Ludwig-Maximilians-University Hospital, Munich, Germany;
Leonardo K. Bittencourt, Fluminense Federal University,
Niterói; Leonardo K. Bittencourt and Romeu
Domingues, Clínica de Diagnóstico por Imagem
(CDPI/Dasa), Rio de Janeiro, Brazil; Pek-Lan Khong, University of
Hong Kong, Queen Mary Hospital, Hong Kong, China; Zarina Lockhat,
University of Pretoria, Steve Biko Academic Hospital, Pretoria, South Africa;
Ada Muellner and Hedvig Hricak, Memorial Sloan
Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY; and Richard L. Schilsky,
American Society of Clinical Oncology, Alexandria, VA
| | - Romeu Domingues
- Heinz-Peter Schlemmer, German Cancer Research Center,
Heidelberg; Melvin D’Anastasi and Maximilian F.
Reiser, Ludwig-Maximilians-University Hospital, Munich, Germany;
Leonardo K. Bittencourt, Fluminense Federal University,
Niterói; Leonardo K. Bittencourt and Romeu
Domingues, Clínica de Diagnóstico por Imagem
(CDPI/Dasa), Rio de Janeiro, Brazil; Pek-Lan Khong, University of
Hong Kong, Queen Mary Hospital, Hong Kong, China; Zarina Lockhat,
University of Pretoria, Steve Biko Academic Hospital, Pretoria, South Africa;
Ada Muellner and Hedvig Hricak, Memorial Sloan
Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY; and Richard L. Schilsky,
American Society of Clinical Oncology, Alexandria, VA
| | - Pek-Lan Khong
- Heinz-Peter Schlemmer, German Cancer Research Center,
Heidelberg; Melvin D’Anastasi and Maximilian F.
Reiser, Ludwig-Maximilians-University Hospital, Munich, Germany;
Leonardo K. Bittencourt, Fluminense Federal University,
Niterói; Leonardo K. Bittencourt and Romeu
Domingues, Clínica de Diagnóstico por Imagem
(CDPI/Dasa), Rio de Janeiro, Brazil; Pek-Lan Khong, University of
Hong Kong, Queen Mary Hospital, Hong Kong, China; Zarina Lockhat,
University of Pretoria, Steve Biko Academic Hospital, Pretoria, South Africa;
Ada Muellner and Hedvig Hricak, Memorial Sloan
Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY; and Richard L. Schilsky,
American Society of Clinical Oncology, Alexandria, VA
| | - Zarina Lockhat
- Heinz-Peter Schlemmer, German Cancer Research Center,
Heidelberg; Melvin D’Anastasi and Maximilian F.
Reiser, Ludwig-Maximilians-University Hospital, Munich, Germany;
Leonardo K. Bittencourt, Fluminense Federal University,
Niterói; Leonardo K. Bittencourt and Romeu
Domingues, Clínica de Diagnóstico por Imagem
(CDPI/Dasa), Rio de Janeiro, Brazil; Pek-Lan Khong, University of
Hong Kong, Queen Mary Hospital, Hong Kong, China; Zarina Lockhat,
University of Pretoria, Steve Biko Academic Hospital, Pretoria, South Africa;
Ada Muellner and Hedvig Hricak, Memorial Sloan
Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY; and Richard L. Schilsky,
American Society of Clinical Oncology, Alexandria, VA
| | - Ada Muellner
- Heinz-Peter Schlemmer, German Cancer Research Center,
Heidelberg; Melvin D’Anastasi and Maximilian F.
Reiser, Ludwig-Maximilians-University Hospital, Munich, Germany;
Leonardo K. Bittencourt, Fluminense Federal University,
Niterói; Leonardo K. Bittencourt and Romeu
Domingues, Clínica de Diagnóstico por Imagem
(CDPI/Dasa), Rio de Janeiro, Brazil; Pek-Lan Khong, University of
Hong Kong, Queen Mary Hospital, Hong Kong, China; Zarina Lockhat,
University of Pretoria, Steve Biko Academic Hospital, Pretoria, South Africa;
Ada Muellner and Hedvig Hricak, Memorial Sloan
Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY; and Richard L. Schilsky,
American Society of Clinical Oncology, Alexandria, VA
| | - Maximilian F. Reiser
- Heinz-Peter Schlemmer, German Cancer Research Center,
Heidelberg; Melvin D’Anastasi and Maximilian F.
Reiser, Ludwig-Maximilians-University Hospital, Munich, Germany;
Leonardo K. Bittencourt, Fluminense Federal University,
Niterói; Leonardo K. Bittencourt and Romeu
Domingues, Clínica de Diagnóstico por Imagem
(CDPI/Dasa), Rio de Janeiro, Brazil; Pek-Lan Khong, University of
Hong Kong, Queen Mary Hospital, Hong Kong, China; Zarina Lockhat,
University of Pretoria, Steve Biko Academic Hospital, Pretoria, South Africa;
Ada Muellner and Hedvig Hricak, Memorial Sloan
Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY; and Richard L. Schilsky,
American Society of Clinical Oncology, Alexandria, VA
| | - Richard L. Schilsky
- Heinz-Peter Schlemmer, German Cancer Research Center,
Heidelberg; Melvin D’Anastasi and Maximilian F.
Reiser, Ludwig-Maximilians-University Hospital, Munich, Germany;
Leonardo K. Bittencourt, Fluminense Federal University,
Niterói; Leonardo K. Bittencourt and Romeu
Domingues, Clínica de Diagnóstico por Imagem
(CDPI/Dasa), Rio de Janeiro, Brazil; Pek-Lan Khong, University of
Hong Kong, Queen Mary Hospital, Hong Kong, China; Zarina Lockhat,
University of Pretoria, Steve Biko Academic Hospital, Pretoria, South Africa;
Ada Muellner and Hedvig Hricak, Memorial Sloan
Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY; and Richard L. Schilsky,
American Society of Clinical Oncology, Alexandria, VA
| | - Hedvig Hricak
- Heinz-Peter Schlemmer, German Cancer Research Center,
Heidelberg; Melvin D’Anastasi and Maximilian F.
Reiser, Ludwig-Maximilians-University Hospital, Munich, Germany;
Leonardo K. Bittencourt, Fluminense Federal University,
Niterói; Leonardo K. Bittencourt and Romeu
Domingues, Clínica de Diagnóstico por Imagem
(CDPI/Dasa), Rio de Janeiro, Brazil; Pek-Lan Khong, University of
Hong Kong, Queen Mary Hospital, Hong Kong, China; Zarina Lockhat,
University of Pretoria, Steve Biko Academic Hospital, Pretoria, South Africa;
Ada Muellner and Hedvig Hricak, Memorial Sloan
Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY; and Richard L. Schilsky,
American Society of Clinical Oncology, Alexandria, VA
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Affiliation(s)
- John R Zalcberg
- Head, Cancer Research Program, School of Public Health & Preventive Medicine Monash University, Melbourne, Australia; CEO, Wonder Drug Consulting Pty Ltd, Cronulla, Australia.
| | - Michael Wonder
- Head, Cancer Research Program, School of Public Health & Preventive Medicine Monash University, Melbourne, Australia; CEO, Wonder Drug Consulting Pty Ltd, Cronulla, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Robinson B, Dijkstra B, Davey V, Tomlinson S, Frampton C. Adherence to Adjuvant Endocrine Therapy in Christchurch Women with Early Breast Cancer. Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol) 2017; 30:e9-e15. [PMID: 29103853 DOI: 10.1016/j.clon.2017.10.015] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/15/2017] [Revised: 08/16/2017] [Accepted: 10/04/2017] [Indexed: 01/31/2023]
Abstract
AIMS To assess adherence to adjuvant endocrine therapy by a real-world cohort of women in Christchurch and to determine any associated factors. MATERIALS AND METHODS Records were retrieved of all women newly diagnosed with early breast cancer and registered on the Christchurch Breast Cancer Patient Register over 4 years from June 2009. Demographic and pathological factors, dates of starting and stopping endocrine therapies and reported side-effects were collected. The proportion remaining on endocrine therapy was analysed by Kaplan-Meier curve; Cox regression analysis was used to identify independent factors influencing adherence. RESULTS Of 1213 women, 1018 (83.9%) had oestrogen receptor-positive tumours, of whom 674 (66.2%) started adjuvant endocrine therapy, including 62 (9.2%) neoadjuvantly. Uptake was 52.4% of those with T1 tumours, 89% with T2 tumours, 93% with T3/T4 tumours, 92.7% with node-positive tumours and 49.7% with node-negative tumours. The initial endocrine therapy was an aromatase inhibitor in 254 (38%) and tamoxifen for 412 (61%). At 1 year, 90% remained adherent, at 2 years 84%, at 3 years 81%, at 4 years 76%, at 4.5 years 71% and at 5 years 50%, with a median duration of 60 months (56-64 months, 95% confidence interval) and a median follow-up of 33 months. Overall, 135 (20%) women stopped treatment for adverse events or poor tolerability. A longer persistence with endocrine therapy was associated with node-positive tumours (hazard ratio 1.38, P = 0.003), but not first hormone used; aromatase inhibitor compared with tamoxifen, P = 0.76. CONCLUSION Adjuvant endocrine therapy use fell to 50% by 5 years, limiting possible survival benefits, providing support for efforts to increase compliance.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- B Robinson
- University of Otago Christchurch, Christchurch, New Zealand; Oncology Service, Christchurch Hospital, Christchurch, New Zealand; Department of Medicine, University of Otago Christchurch, Christchurch, New Zealand.
| | - B Dijkstra
- Department of General Surgery, Christchurch Hospital, Christchurch, New Zealand
| | - V Davey
- Department of General Surgery, Christchurch Hospital, Christchurch, New Zealand
| | - S Tomlinson
- University of Otago Christchurch, Christchurch, New Zealand
| | - C Frampton
- Department of Medicine, University of Otago Christchurch, Christchurch, New Zealand
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Htun H, Elwood J, Ioannides S, Fishman T, Lawrenson R. Investigations and referral for suspected cancer in primary care in New Zealand-A survey linked to the International Cancer Benchmarking Partnership. Eur J Cancer Care (Engl) 2017; 26. [DOI: 10.1111/ecc.12634] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 11/20/2016] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- H.W. Htun
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics; School of Population Health; University of Auckland; Auckland New Zealand
| | - J.M. Elwood
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics; School of Population Health; University of Auckland; Auckland New Zealand
| | - S.J. Ioannides
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics; School of Population Health; University of Auckland; Auckland New Zealand
| | - T. Fishman
- Department of General Practice and Primary Health Care; School of Population Health; University of Auckland; Auckland New Zealand
| | - R. Lawrenson
- Waikato Clinical Campus; University of Auckland; Hamilton New Zealand
| |
Collapse
|