Multivariate Analysis of Correspondence between Left Atrial Volumes Assessed by Echocardiography and 3-Dimensional Electroanatomic Mapping in Patients with Atrial Fibrillation

A method for measuring the angle between left atrial and left ventricular long axes using 3D echocardiography

BACKGROUND

Left ventricle (LV) optimized views are routinely used for left atrial (LA) volume and strain measurements on 2D echocardiography. This might be a source of the error because of the variation of the angle between the left atrial and left ventricle long axes (LA-LV angle), leading to foreshortening of the LA.

METHODS

We investigated two novel parameters: the angle between the left atrial and left ventricle long axes (LA-LV angle) and its deviation from the 4-chamber plane. To accurately measure the angles in 3D space, these measurements were performed using 3D echocardiography. We developed a method for the measurement based on marking anatomic points of reference in the 3D echocardiogram and measuring the angles between these points. We used three types of phantoms made of wood and agar-agar to investigate the repeatability and reproducibility of these measurements and performed measurements on human subjects.

RESULTS

The ultrasound measurements were in excellent agreement with the true angles of the phantoms: LA-LV angle bias was .5 degrees (95% CI -1.8 to +2.7) in the wooden phantoms and 1.2 degrees (-.7 to +3.1) in the agar-agar phantoms, while the angle deviation from the 4-chamber plane was -.9 degrees (-4.3 to +4.1) in the wooden phantoms and .0 degrees (-3.3 to +3.3) in the agar-agar phantoms. The measurements demonstrated good repeatability and reproducibility (Pearson correlation coefficients ranging from .91 to .99). The measurements from human hearts showed good repeatability (Pearson correlation was .81 for repeated LA-LV angle measurements and .97 for repeated measurements of the deviation from the 4-chamber plane).

CONCLUSION

The measurement of the LA-LV angle is a feasible tool to investigate one eventual error of 2D echocardiography.

The significance of pulmonary veins isolation radiofrequency time and the evolution of left atrium volume on a twelve-year observational follow-up of paroxysmal atrial fibrillation patients

Aims

Pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) is the treatment of choice of paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (PAF). However, radiofrequency delivery at extra-PV sites may be additionally required. We compared clinical and procedural characteristics of patients undergoing PVI alone versus adjunctive extra-PV substrate modification, at first procedure and repeat procedures for AF recurrence.

Methods

587 patients with PAF undergoing radiofrequency (RF) ablation were retrospectively included. Extra-PV ablation was performed in case of sustained AF despite PVI, or at re-do procedures without PV conduction recovery. Demographic, clinical and electrophysiological predictors of survival without re-intervention were analysed in patients’ groups having undergone one (G1), two (G2) or three or more procedures (G3).

Results

At baseline procedure, PV RF ablation time was shorter in G1 compared to G2/G3 whereas extra-PV RF ablation time was greater in G3 compared to G1. The proportion of patients requiring PV re-isolation decreased with repeat procedures. Smaller LA before procedure 1 (p1) or p2 was associated with PV reconnection at p2. Conversely larger LA before p1 was associated with extra-PV substrate modification at p2. Late re-do procedure timing (>1yr) was associated with increasing LA volume. Only longer PV and total RF time predicted poorer survival free from AF without re-intervention.

Conclusion

Longer PV RF time predicted requirement for re-ablation during follow-up. Smaller LA size predicted an increased probability of PV reconnection and decreased extra-PV substrate modification at p2. LA size decreased in patients undergoing early re-intervention, whereas it increased in patients undergoing re-intervention later on suggesting ongoing remodelling or progression.

3D electroanatomical mapping is less sensitive to atrial remodeling in estimation of true left atrial volume than echocardiography

Background

Left atrial (LA) enlargement has been identified as a predictor of worse clinical outcome after catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation (AF). We investigated the correspondence of LA size parameters assessed by echocardiography, CT and 3D electroanatomical mapping in patients with AF treated by catheter ablation.

Methods

We analyzed echocardiographic LA volume measurements by disc summation method (LAV_DISC), computed tomography (LAV_CT) and 3D electroanatomical mapping (LAV_CARTO) in 100 pts. (71% males; aged 63 ± 8 years; paroxysmal AF in 55% of patients).

Results

Mean LAV_DISC was 83 ± 25 ml (median: 115; IQR: 98–140 ml), mean LAV_CT was 120 ± 34 ml (median: 115; IQR: 98–140 ml) and mean LAV_CARTO was 123 ± 36 ml (median: 118; IQR: 99–132 ml). Pearson’s correlation coefficient between LAV_DISC a LAV_CT was 0.6 (p < 0.0001) and between LAV_CARTO and LAV_CT was 0.79 (p < 0.0001). There was a significant difference between the two correlation coefficients (p < 0.004). The absolute difference between LAV_CARTO and LAV_CT (3.5 (95% CI -42 – 43) ml) was significantly lower (p < 0.0001) as compared to LAV_DISC and LAV_CT (− 39 (95% CI -102 – 24) ml). In opposite to LAV_DISC, the bias between LAV obtained by CT and CARTO did not differentiate according to presence of spherical remodeling (1.7 ± 28 vs. vs. 5.1 ± 31 ml). Only presence of sinus rhythm was significant and independent covariate of the difference between CARTO and CT-derived LAVs by multivariate regression analysis.

Conclusions

Even though LA volumes evaluated by 3D-electroanatomical mapping have quite good accuracy, the precision is low. For volumes estimated by echocardiography, both precision and accuracy are low.

Disparity between two-dimensional echocardiographic and electroanatomic left and right atrial volumes in patients undergoing catheter ablation for long-standing persistent atrial fibrillation

Left atrial (LA) volume (LAV) is used for the selection of patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) to rhythm control strategies. Calculation of LAV from the LA diameters and areas by two-dimensional (2D) echocardiography may result in significant error. Accuracy of atrial volume assessment has never been studied in patients with long-standing persistent AF (LSPAF) and significant atrial remodeling. This study investigated correlation and agreement between 2D echocardiographic (Simpson method) and electroanatomic (CARTO, Biosense Webster) left and right atrial (RA) volumes (LAV(ECHO) vs. LAV(CARTO) and RAV(ECHO) vs. RAV(CARTO)) in patients undergoing catheter ablation for LSPAF. The study enrolled 173 consecutive subjects (females: 21 %, age: 59+/-9 years). There was only modest correlation between LAV(ECHO) (92+/-31 ml) and LAV(CARTO) (178+/-37 ml) (R=0.57), and RAV(ECHO) (71+/-29 ml) and RAV(CARTO) (173+/-34 ml) (R=0.42), respectively. LAV(ECHO) and RAV(ECHO) underestimated LAV(CARTO) and RAV(CARTO) with the absolute bias (+/-1.96 standard deviation) of -85 (-148; -22) ml and -102 (-169; -35) ml, respectively, and with the relative bias of -48 (-75; -21) % and -59 (-88; -30) %, respectively (all P<0.000001 for their mutual difference). Significant confounders of this difference were not identified. In patients with LSPAF, 2D echocardiography significantly underestimated both LA and RA volumes as compared with electroanatomic reference. This disagreement was independent of clinical, echocardiographic and mapping characteristics.