Influence of Head Motion on the Accuracy of 3D Reconstruction with Cone-Beam CT: Landmark Identification Errors in Maxillofacial Surface Model

The impact of CBCT-head tilting on 3D condylar segmentation reproducibility

OBJECTIVES

To investigate whether variations in head positioning may influence the reproducibility of cone-beam CT (CBCT) three-dimensional (3D) segmented models of the mandibular condyle.

METHODS

Five fresh frozen cadaver heads were scanned in four different positions: reference position (RP) and a set of three tilted alternative head positions (AP) in anteroposterior direction (AP1: 2 cm anterior translation, AP2: 5° pitch rotation, AP3: 10° pitch rotation). Surface models of mandibular condyles were constructed and compared with the condylar reference position using voxel-based registration. Descriptive statistics and a linear mixed-effects model were performed to compare condylar volumetric differences and root mean square (RMS) distance between surfaces of AP vs RP.

RESULTS

The mean differences in condylar volumes of AP vs RP were 14.1 mm³ (95% CI [-79.3, 107.4]) for AP1, 1.0 mm³ (95% CI [-87.2, 89.2]) for AP2 and 0.1 mm³ (95% CI [-88.3, 88.4]) for AP3. Mean and absolute volumetric differences did not exceed earlier reported intraoperator differences of 30 mm³. The RMS distance values obtained per group were 0.12 mm (95% CI [0.05,0.20]) for AP1, 0.17 mm (95% CI [0.10, 0.22]) for AP2 and 0.17 mm for AP3 (95% CI [0.10,0.22]). The confidence intervals (CI) for RMS distance remained far below the threshold for clinical acceptability (0.5 mm).

CONCLUSIONS

Within the limits of the present study, it is suggested that tilted head positions may affect the reproducibility of 3D condylar segmentation, thereby influencing outcome in repeated CBCT scanning. Nevertheless, observed differences are unlikely to have a meaningful impact on clinical patient diagnosis and management.

Effect of Fabrication Technology on the Accuracy of Surgical Guides for Dental-Implant Surgery

BACKGROUND

The accuracy of surgical guides is a relevant factor in both surgical safety and prosthetic implications. The impact of widespread fabrication technologies (milling and 3D printing) was investigated.

METHODS

Surgical guides manufactured by means of two specific milling and 3D-printing systems were digitized and compared in a 3D analysis with the digital file of the designed guides. The surface mean 3D distance (at the surface where the teeth and mucosa made contact) and the axial and linear deviations of the sleeves' housings were measured by means of a metrological software program. Univariate and multivariate statistical analyses were used to investigate the effects of the fabrication technology, type of support, and arch type on the surgical guides' accuracy.

RESULTS

The median deviations of the intaglio surface in contact with the mucosa were significantly (p < 0.001) lower for the milled surgical guides (0.05 mm) than for the 3D-printed guides (-0.07 mm), in comparison with the reference STL file. The generalized estimated equation models showed that the axial deviations of the sleeves' housings (a median of 0.82 degrees for the milling, and 1.37 degrees for the 3D printing) were significantly affected by the fabrication technology (p = 0.011) (the milling exhibited better results), the type of support (p < 0.001), and the combined effect of the fabrication technology and the sleeve-to-crest angle (p = 0.003). The linear deviation (medians of 0.12 mm for the milling and 0.21 mm for the 3D printing) of their center points was significantly affected by the type of support (p = 0.001), with the milling performing slightly better than the 3D printing.

CONCLUSIONS

The magnitude of the difference might account for a limited clinical significance.

Surgical guides for dental implants: measurement of the accuracy using a freeware metrology software program

PURPOSE

Manufacturing-related inaccuracies of surgical guides for static computer-aided implant surgery may contribute to the overall potential error in the obtained implant position. Measuring such inaccuracies before surgery may provide quality control assessment and improve the safety and outcomes of guided implant surgery. This technical report demonstrates a workflow to measure the accuracy of a surgical guide (at the intaglio surface and sleeve housing) using a freeware metrology software program.

METHODS

The scan of a milled surgical guide was aligned to and compared with its reference computer-aided design model using a freeware metrology software program (GOM Inspect suite; GOM GmbH). The trueness of the internal surface of the surgical guide was measured as an indicator of adaptation to the supporting tissues. Additionally, some features were constructed to extract the plane at the sleeve entrance and sleeve axis and to set a local coordinate system on them. Linear and angular deviations between the planned and obtained sleeve axes were measured using this system. Such measurements, together with additional known data (sleeve offset and the planned implant length), allowed the estimation of linear errors in implant position at both the implant platform and apex by applying common geometric formulas, based on the assumption that all other sources of error in implant position could be effectively controlled during the surgical procedure.

CONCLUSION

The proposed digital technique is a cost-effective approach for quality control of the inaccuracies of a surgical guide and predicts the related potential error in implant position.

Three dimensional printed surgical guides: Effect of time on dimensional stability

PURPOSE

To analyze, in vitro, the dimensional stability over time of 3D-printed surgical guides.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Ten surgical guides, manufactured by digital light processing 3D-printing technology, were scanned immediately after post-processing and then after 5, 10, 15, and 20 days. The corresponding standard tessellation language (STL) files were used for comparison with the reference CAD project. Mean absolute deviation (MAD) of the intaglio surface, axial, and linear deviations of the sleeves' housings were measured. Generalized estimated equations models (α = .05) were used to investigate the effect of time.

RESULTS

MAD of the teeth intaglio surface showed less variation (minimum: 0.002, maximum: 0.014 mm) than that of the mucosa (minimum:0.026, maximum:0.074 mm). Axial variations of the sleeves' housings on the sagittal (minimum: -0.008, maximum: -0.577 degrees) and frontal plane (minimum: -0.193, maximum: 0.525 degrees) changed with similar patterns, but opposite trends (decreasing for the former). Linear deviations of center points of the sleeves' housings had a shifting (minimum: -0.074, maximum: 0.02 mm) pattern with a decreasing tendency. Time after processing had a significant effect, either alone or nested with guides volume, on all outcomes of interest, except for MAD of the mucosa intaglio surface (P<.001), which was significantly affected only by the time-volume nested effect (P = .012).

CONCLUSIONS

Within the limitations of the experimental design, post-manufacturing dimensional variations of surgical guides were statistically significant. Although limited, they are an additional source of variability affecting the overall accuracy of computer-guided surgery. As such, they should be addressed by further research. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.

Application Value of the CT Scan 3D Reconstruction Technique in Maxillofacial Fracture Patients

Purpose The aim of the study was to explore the application value of computerized tomography (CT) scan 3D reconstruction technology in maxillofacial fracture patients. Methods A total of 80 maxillofacial fracture patients who underwent surgical treatment in Shijiazhuang People's Hospital from January 2019 to January 2020 were enrolled. All of them received 128-slice spiral CT  scans before surgery, and the images were subjected to multiplanar reconstruction (MRP) and volume reconstruction (VR). Results A total of 181 fractures were found in 80 patients with maxillofacial fractures. The detection rates of axial CT, MRP, and VR were 77.90% (141/181), 93.92% (170/181), and 97.79% (177/181), respectively. The detection rates of the four inspection methods were statistically different. Taking the findings of surgical anatomy as the gold standard, the sensitivity of MRP and VR for the diagnosis of maxillofacial fractures was 90.06% (163/170) and 95.56% (174/177), with no significant difference. Conclusion CT scan 3D reconstruction technology has a high application value in the clinical diagnosis and treatment of maxillofacial fracture patients.

Head motion during cone-beam computed tomography: Analysis of frequency and influence on image quality

Purpose

Image artifacts caused by patient motion cause problems in cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) because they lead to distortion of the 3-dimensional reconstruction. This prospective study was performed to quantify patient movement during CBCT acquisition and its influence on image quality.

Materials and Methods

In total, 412 patients receiving CBCT imaging were equipped with a wireless head sensor system that detected inertial, gyroscopic, and magnetometric movements with 6 dimensions of freedom. The type and amplitude of movements during CBCT acquisition were evaluated and image quality was rated in 7 different anatomical regions of interest. For continuous variables, significance was calculated using the Student t-test. A linear regression model was applied to identify associations of the type and extent of motion with image quality scores. Kappa statistics were used to assess intra- and inter-rater agreement. Chi-square testing was used to analyze the impact of age and sex on head movement.

Results

All CBCT images were acquired in a 10-month period. In 24% of the investigations, movement was recorded (acceleration: >0.10 [m/s²]; angular velocity: >0.018 [°/s]). In all examined regions of interest, head motion during CBCT acquisition resulted in significant impairment of image quality (P<0.001). Movement in the horizontal and vertical axes was most relevant for image quality (R²>0.7).

Conclusion

Relevant head motions during CBCT imaging were frequently detected, leading to image quality loss and potentially impairing diagnosis and therapy planning. The presented data illustrate the need for digital correction algorithms and hardware to minimize motion artefacts in CBCT imaging.

Impact of movement and motion-artefact correction on image quality and interpretability in CBCT units with aligned and lateral-offset detectors

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the impact of movement and motion-artefact correction systems on CBCT image quality and interpretability of simulated diagnostic tasks for aligned and lateral-offset detectors.

METHODS

A human skull simulating three diagnostic tasks (implant planning in the anterior maxilla, implant planning in the left-side-mandible and mandibular molar furcation assessment in the right-side-mandible) was mounted on a robot performing six movement types. Four CBCT units were used: Cranex 3Dx (CRA), Ortophos SL (ORT), Promax 3D Mid (PRO), and X1. Protocols were tested with aligned (CRA, ORT, PRO, and X1) and lateral-offset (CRA and PRO) detectors and two motion-artefact correction systems (PRO and X1). Movements were performed at one moment-in-time (t₁), for units with an aligned detector, and three moments-in-time (t₁-first-half of the acquisition, t₂-second-half, t₃-both) for the units with a lateral-offset detector. 98 volumes were acquired. Images were scored by three observers, blinded to the unit and presence of movement, for motion-related stripe artefacts, overall unsharpness, and interpretability. Fleiss' κ was used to assess interobserver agreement.

RESULTS

Interobserver agreement was substantial for all parameters (0.66-0.68). For aligned detectors, in all diagnostic tasks a motion-artefact correction system influenced image interpretability. For lateral-offset detectors, the interpretability varied according to the unit and moment-in-time, in which the movement was performed. PRO motion-artefact correction system was less effective for the offset detector than its aligned counterpart.

CONCLUSION

Motion-artefact correction systems enhanced image quality and interpretability for units with aligned detectors but were less effective for those with lateral-offset detectors.

CAD/CAM implant surgical guides: maximum errors in implant positioning attributable to the properties of the metal sleeve/osteotomy drill combination

BACKGROUND

The purpose of this study is to provide the relevant equations and the reference tables needed for calculating the maximum errors in implant positioning attributed to the properties of the mechanical parts of any CAD/CAM implant surgical guide, especially the in-office manufactured ones.

METHODS

An algorithm was developed and implemented in C programming language in order to accurately calculate the maximum error at the apex, error at the neck, vertical error at the apex and deviation of implant axis, between the planned and the actual implant position. The calculations were based on the parameters of total length (= implant length + offset), offset (distance from neck of implant to the lip of the metal sleeve), clearance (space between the bur and the sleeve), sleeve length. The variability of the parameters was constrained: (1) implant length, 8-18 mm; (2) sleeve length, 4-7 mm; (3) clearance, 50-410 μm; and (4) offset values, 6-17 mm. Multiple regression analysis was conducted to quantify the relationship between the error at the apex and the error at the neck and various predictors.

RESULTS

The equations used for the bespoke estimation of the errors in implant positioning along with three reference tables of the various errors tabulated are presented. The maximum error at the apex of the implant was computed 2.8 mm, the maximum deviation of the implant axis 5.9° and the maximum error at the neck (entrance) of the implant was estimated 1.5 mm. The vertical error between the planned and actual implant position can be considered negligible (< 0.1 mm).

CONCLUSIONS

The results of this study compute part of the expected differences in final clinical implant position when any CAD/CAM surgical guide is used. Given that the implantologist, with the capability of an in-office digital designed and 3d printed surgical guide, can readily decide upon the dimensions of the metal sleeve, the clearance between the osteotomy bur and the sleeve, and the design of the guide in relation to the distance of the lip of the sleeve to the implant neck (offset), in order to minimise the inevitable errors.

Reliability and accuracy of three imaging software packages used for 3D analysis of the upper airway on cone beam computed tomography images

OBJECTIVES

The aim of this study was to assess the reliability and accuracy of three different imaging software packages for three-dimensional analysis of the upper airway using CBCT images.

METHODS

To assess the reliability of the software packages, 15 NewTom 5G^® (QR Systems, Verona, Italy) CBCT data sets were randomly and retrospectively selected. Two observers measured the volume, minimum cross-sectional area and the length of the upper airway using Amira^® (Visage Imaging Inc., Carlsbad, CA), 3Diagnosys^® (3diemme, Cantu, Italy) and OnDemand3D^® (CyberMed, Seoul, Republic of Korea) software packages. The intra- and inter-observer reliability of the upper airway measurements were determined using intraclass correlation coefficients and Bland & Altman agreement tests. To assess the accuracy of the software packages, one NewTom 5G^® CBCT data set was used to print a three-dimensional anthropomorphic phantom with known dimensions to be used as the "gold standard". This phantom was subsequently scanned using a NewTom 5G^® scanner. Based on the CBCT data set of the phantom, one observer measured the volume, minimum cross-sectional area, and length of the upper airway using Amira^®, 3Diagnosys^®, and OnDemand3D^®, and compared these measurements with the gold standard.

RESULTS

The intra- and inter-observer reliability of the measurements of the upper airway using the different software packages were excellent (intraclass correlation coefficient ≥0.75). There was excellent agreement between all three software packages in volume, minimum cross-sectional area and length measurements. All software packages underestimated the upper airway volume by -8.8% to -12.3%, the minimum cross-sectional area by -6.2% to -14.6%, and the length by -1.6% to -2.9%.

CONCLUSIONS

All three software packages offered reliable volume, minimum cross-sectional area and length measurements of the upper airway. The length measurements of the upper airway were the most accurate results in all software packages. All software packages underestimated the upper airway dimensions of the anthropomorphic phantom.