Quantification of Dialytic Removal and Extracellular Calcium Mass Balance during a Weekly Cycle of Hemodialysis

Same therapy, same calcium mobilization? Exploring calcium exchange across body compartments using a patient-specific predictive model

BACKGROUND

Comprehensive, patient-specific models are essential to study calcium deposition and mobilization during dialysis. We aim to develop tools to support clinical prescriptions with a more accurate approach for the prediction of calcium mobilization while also considering major electrolytes and catabolites.

METHODS

We modified a multi-solute model predicting patient-specific dialysis response by incorporating a calcium buffer to represent bone exchanges. Data from four centers, involving 127 patients with six sessions each, were utilized. For each patient, three sessions were allocated for model training (ID123), while the remaining sessions were for validation (PRED456). The normalized root mean square error (nRMSE%) was used to evaluate both descriptive and predictive accuracy. Correlations between initial data and calcium exchanges were also assessed.

RESULTS

The overall nRMSE% for ID123 was 3.92%. For PRED456, it was 3.46% (ranging from a minimum of 1.17% for [Na+] to a maximum of 6.62% for [urea]). The median nRMSE% for plasma calcium varied between 1.13 and 8.32 for SHD sessions, depending on whether Ca_dialysis fluid (Cad) was ≥ or <1.50 mmol/L, respectively. For HDF sessions, the range was between 2.90 and 5.89. A significant and moderate correlation was found between overall calcium removal and the buffer balance. The most robust correlation observed was between the amount of calcium administered via post-dilution fluid and the overall calcium removal in the dialysis filter.

CONCLUSIONS

Identical therapy settings do not uniformly affect calcium mobilization, and our approach offers insight into calcium distribution across body compartments. This understanding will enhance clinical prescription practices.

Strategies for optimizing urea removal to enable portable kidney dialysis: A reappraisal

BACKGROUND

Portable hemodialysis has the potential to improve health outcomes and quality of life for patients with kidney failure at reduced costs. Urea removal, required for dialysate regeneration, is a central function of any existing/potential portable dialysis device. Urea in the spent dialysate coexists with non-urea uremic toxins, nutrients, and electrolytes, all of which will interfere with the urea removal efficiency, regardless of whether the underlying urea removal mechanism is based on urease conversion, direct urea adsorption, or oxidation. The aim of the current review is to identify the amount of the most prevalent chemicals being removed during a single dialysis session and evaluate the potential benefits of an urea-selective membrane for portable dialysis.

METHODS

We have performed a literature search using Web of Science and PubMed databases to find available articles reporting (or be able to calculate from blood plasma concentration) > 5 mg of individually quantified solutes removed during thrice-weekly hemodialysis sessions. If multiple reports of the same solute were available, the reported values were averaged, and the geometric mean of standard deviations was taken. Further critical literature analysis of reported dialysate regeneration methods was performed using Web of Science and PubMed databases.

RESULTS

On average, 46.0 g uremic retention solutes are removed in a single conventional dialysis session, out of which urea is only 23.6 g. For both urease- and sorbent-based urea removal mechanisms, amino acids, with 7.7 g removal per session, could potentially interfere with urea removal efficiency. Additionally for the oxidation-based urea removal system, plentiful nutrients such as glucose (24.0 g) will interfere with urea removal by competition. Using a nanofiltration membrane between dialysate and oxidation unit with a molecular weight cutoff (MWCO) of ~200 Da, 67.6 g of non-electrolyte species will be removed in a single dialysis session, out of which 44.0 g are non-urea molecules. If the membrane MWCO is further decreased to 120 Da, the mass of non-electrolyte non-urea species will drop to 9.3 g. Reverse osmosis membranes have been shown to be both effective at blocking the transport of non-urea species (creatinine for example with ~90% rejection ratio), and permissive for urea transport (~20% rejection ratio), making them a promising urea selective membrane to increase the efficiency of the oxidative urea removal system.

CONCLUSIONS

Compiled are quantified solute removal amounts greater than 5 mg per session during conventional hemodialysis treatments, to act as a guide for portable dialysis system design. Analysis shows that multiple chemical species in the dialysate interfere with all proposed portable urea removal systems. This suggests the need for an additional protective dialysate loop coupled to urea removal system and an urea-selective membrane.

Calculation of the Gibbs-Donnan factors for multi-ion solutions with non-permeating charge on both sides of a permselective membrane

Separation of two ionic solutions with a permselective membrane that is impermeable to some of the ions leads to an uneven distribution of permeating ions on the two sides of the membrane described by the Gibbs–Donnan (G–D) equilibrium with the G–D factors relating ion concentrations in the two solutions. Here, we present a method of calculating the G–D factors for ideal electroneutral multi-ion solutions with different total charge of non-permeating species on each side of a permselective membrane separating two compartments. We discuss some special cases of G–D equilibrium for which an analytical solution may be found, and we prove the transitivity of G–D factors for multi-ion solutions in several compartments interconnected by permselective membranes. We show a few examples of calculation of the G–D factors for both simple and complex solutions, including the case of human blood plasma and interstitial fluid separated by capillary walls. The article is accompanied by an online tool that enables the calculation of the G–D factors and the equilibrium concentrations for multi-ion solutions with various composition in terms of permeating ions and non-permeating charge, according to the presented method.

A simplified protocol for individualized regional citrate anticoagulation for hemodialysis: A single-center, randomized clinical study

INTRODUCTION

The lack of individualized treatment protocols and complicated procedures are important factors limiting the use of regional citrate anticoagulation (RCA) technology in hemodialysis. This study aims to validate the safety and efficacy of a simplified individualized RCA protocol for hemodialysis.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

From June 2019 to August 2019, 45 patients with active bleeding or bleeding tendency undergoing maintenance hemodialysis in the Nephrology Department of the First Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University were randomly divided into a modified conventional RCA protocol group with a low-flux dialyzer, a simplified individualized RCA protocol group with a high-flux dialyzer, and a simplified individualized RCA protocol group with a low-flux dialyzer.

RESULTS

A total of 45 patients were included in this study. The mean age of the patients was 57.38 ± 19.05 years, and 78% were men. Forty-three patients completed 4 hours of hemodialysis, and the median total clotting scores in the 3 groups were 11, 12, and 12. Compared with the modified conventional RCA protocol group with a low-flux dialyzer, the 2 simplified individualized RCA protocol groups had better clotting scores for the dialyzer, arterial bubble trap, and single-pool urea clearance index (spKt/VBUN) and lower costs. Moreover, these parameters did not differ between the 2 simplified individualized RCA protocol groups. No electrolyte or acid-base imbalances or citrate poisoning was observed in any of the 3 groups. Adverse events did not differ significantly among the 3 groups.

CONCLUSIONS

The simplified individualized RCA protocol is safe, effective, and easy to implement. Therefore, this protocol can be promoted for clinical practice.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

This study was registered in the Chinese Clinical Study Registry under registration number ChiCTR1900023801.

The Crosstalk between Calcium Ions and Aldosterone Contributes to Inflammation, Apoptosis, and Calcification of VSMC via the AIF-1/NF-κB Pathway in Uremia

Vascular calcification is a major complication of maintenance hemodialysis patients. Studies have confirmed that calcification mainly occurs in the vascular smooth muscle cells (VSMC) of the vascular media. However, the exact pathogenesis of VSMC calcification is still unknown. This study shows that the crosstalk between calcium and aldosterone via the allograft inflammatory factor 1 (AIF-1) pathway contributes to calcium homeostasis and VSMC calcification, which is a novel mechanism of vascular calcification in uremia. In vivo results showed that the level of aldosterone and inflammatory factors increased in calcified arteries, whereas no significant changes were observed in peripheral blood. However, the expression of inflammatory factors markedly increased in the peripheral blood of uremic rats without aortic calcification and gradually returned to normal levels with aggravation of aortic calcification. In vitro results showed that there was an interaction between calcium ions and aldosterone in macrophages or VSMC. Calcium induced aldosterone synthesis, and in turn, aldosterone also triggered intracellular calcium content upregulation in macrophages or VSMC. Furthermore, activated macrophages induced inflammation, apoptosis, and calcification of VSMC. Activated VSMC also imparted a similar effect on untreated VSMC. Finally, AIF-1 enhanced aldosterone- or calcium-induced VSMC calcification, and NF-κB inhibitors inhibited the effect of AIF-1 on VSMC. These in vivo and in vitro results suggest that the crosstalk between calcium ions and aldosterone plays an important role in VSMC calcification in uremia via the AIF-1/NF-κB pathway. Local calcified VSMC induced the same pathological process in surrounding VSMC, thereby contributing to calcium homeostasis and accelerating vascular calcification.

Skeletal and cardiovascular consequences of a positive calcium balance during hemodialysis

Patients on hemodialysis are exposed to calcium via the dialysate at least three times a week. Changes in serum calcium vary according to calcium mass transfer during dialysis, which is dependent on the gradient between serum and dialysate calcium concentration (d[Ca]) and the skeleton turnover status that alters the ability of bone to incorporate calcium. Although underappreciated, the d[Ca] can potentially cause positive calcium balance that leads to systemic organ damage, including associations with mortality, myocardial dysfunction, hemodynamic tolerability, vascular calcification, and arrhythmias. The pathophysiology of these adverse effects includes serum calcium changes, parathyroid hormone suppression, and vascular calcification through indirect and direct effects. Some organs are more susceptible to alterations in calcium homeostasis. In this review, we discuss the existing data and potential mechanisms linking the d[Ca] to calcium balance with consequent dysfunction of the skeleton, myocardium, and arteries.

Phosphate clearance in peritoneal dialysis

In renal failure, hyperphosphatemia is common and correlates with increased mortality making phosphate removal a key priority for dialysis therapy. We investigated phosphate clearance, removal and serum level, and factors associated with phosphate control in patients undergoing continuous ambulatory (CAPD), continuous cyclic (CCPD) and automated (APD) peritoneal dialysis (PD). In 154 prevalent PD patients (mean age 53.2 ± 17.6 year, 59% men, 47% anuric), 196 daily collections of urine and 368 collections of dialysate were evaluated in terms of renal, peritoneal and total (renal plus peritoneal) phosphorus removal (g/week), phosphate and creatinine clearances (L/week) and urea KT/V. Dialytic removal of phosphorus was lower in APD (1.34 ± 0.62 g/week) than in CAPD (1.89 ± 0.73 g/week) and CCPD (1.91 ± 0.63 g/week) patients; concomitantly, serum phosphorus was higher in APD than in CAPD (5.55 ± 1.61 vs. 4.84 ± 1.23 mg/dL; p < 0.05). Peritoneal and total phosphate clearances correlated with peritoneal (rho = 0.93) and total (rho = 0.85) creatinine clearances (p < 0.001) but less with peritoneal and total urea KT/V (rho = 0.60 and rho = 0.65, respectively, p < 0.001). Phosphate removal, clearance and serum levels differed between PD modalities. CAPD was associated with higher peritoneal removal and lower serum level of phosphate than APD.

Intradialytic Calcium Kinetics and Cardiovascular Disease in Chronic Hemodialysis Patients

BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVE

Calcium loading has been associated with cardiovascular risk in hemodialysis (HD) patients. However, it remains to be elucidated whether alterations of intradialytic calcium buffering add to the increased cardiovascular disease burden in this high-risk population.

METHODS

Intradialytic calcium kinetics was evaluated in a cross-sectional observational study by measuring dialysate-sided ionized calcium mass balance (iCaMB), calcium buffer capacity, and change in serum calcium levels in 40 chronic HD patients during a routine HD session. A dialysate calcium of 3.5 mEq/L was used to adequately challenge calcium buffer mechanisms. Aortic pulse wave velocity and serum osteocalcin levels were measured prior to the HD session. Presence of cardiovascular disease and diabetes was assessed.

RESULTS

The mean dialysate-sided iCaMB, extracellular fluid ionized calcium mass gain, and buffered ionized calcium mass were 469 (±154), 111 (±49), and 358 (±145) mg/HD, respectively. The mean ionized serum calcium increase (∆iCa) was 0.42 (±0.14) mEq/L per HD. The mean intradialytic calcium buffer capacity was 73 (±18)%. Multivariate regression analysis revealed significant independent association of (1) iCaMB with the dialysate-to-blood calcium gradient at HD start and (2) intradialytic calcium buffer capacity with undercarboxylated osteocalcin. The presence of coronary heart disease was associated with higher ∆iCa but not iCaMB in the multivariate model.

CONCLUSIONS

In line with our proof-of-concept study, we provide clinical evidence for a rapidly accessible and exchangeable calcium pool involved in intradialytic calcium regulation and for the role of osteocalcin as a potential biomarker. Our findings argue for evaluating the prognostic potential of intradialytic calcium kinetics in prospective clinical trials.

Calcium balance in hemodialysis: More uncertainty than certainty

There is controversy about the choice of dialysate calcium concentration (DCa), with strong arguments both in favor of and against the use of a low or high DCa, as they can both be potentially harmful. Evidence suggests that calcium mass balance is positive with a DCa 3.5 mEq/L, negative or neutral with the use of DCa 2.5 mEq/L, whereas both positive and negative balances have been observed with the use of DCa 3.0 mEq/L. Overall, the use of DCa >2.5 mEq/L is usually associated with an increase in serum calcium level and a decrease in serum PTH level and use of lower vitamin D analogue dose, with the opposite effects usually observed with the use of lower DCa. Most of the available evidence is from small-sized and crossover studies; hence, evidence should be regarded with caution and applied in a patient-specific manner. As there are a lot of significant unanswered questions regarding calcium balance and the optimal DCa in hemodialysis patients, further high-quality research is needed to clarify many still unclear aspects of calcium homeostasis and balance in these patients. In conclusion, with the existing evidence the choice of DCa needs to be individualized and contextualized in the setting of each patient's calcium balance needs and homeostatic response, taking also into account oral calcium intake (dietary and medicinal), any other relevant therapy administered, such as vitamin D analogues, the type of renal mineral bone disorder, and associated cardiovascular comorbidity.

Hemodialysis-induced changes in hematocrit, hemoglobin and total protein: Implications for relative blood volume monitoring

Background

Relative blood volume (RBV) changes during hemodialysis (HD) are typically estimated based on online measurements of hematocrit, hemoglobin or total blood protein. The aim of this study was to assess changes in the above parameters during HD in order to compare the potential differences in the RBV changes estimated by individual methods.

Methods

25 anuric maintenance HD patients were monitored during a 1-week conventional HD treatment. Blood samples were collected from the arterial dialysis blood line at the beginning and at the end of each HD session. The analysis of blood samples was performed using the hematology analyzer Advia 2120 and clinical chemistry analyzer Advia 1800 (Siemens Healthcare).

Results

During the analyzed 30 HD sessions with ultrafiltration in the range 0.7–4.0 L (2.5 ± 0.8 L) hematocrit (HCT) increased by 9.1 ± 7.0% (mean ± SD), hemoglobin (HGB) increased by 10.6 ± 6.3%, total plasma protein (TPP) increased by 15.6 ± 9.5%, total blood protein (TBP) increased by 10.4 ± 5.8%, red blood cell count (RBC) increased by 10.8 ± 7.1%, while mean corpuscular red cell volume (MCV) decreased by 1.5 ± 1.1% (all changes statistically significant, p < 0.001). HGB increased on average by 1.5% more than HCT (p < 0.001). The difference between HGB and TBP increase was insignificant (p = 0.16).

Conclusions

Tracking HGB or TBP can be treated as equivalent for the purpose of estimating RBV changes during HD. Due to the reduction of MCV, the HCT-based estimate of RBV changes may underestimate the actual blood volume changes.

Correction: Quantification of Dialytic Removal and Extracellular Calcium Mass Balance during a Weekly Cycle of Hemodialysis

[This corrects the article DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0153285.].

Phosphate and Calcium Control in Short Frequent Hemodialysis with the NxStage System One Cycler: Mass Balance Studies and Comparison with Standard Thrice-Weekly Bicarbonate Dialysis

BACKGROUND

Short frequent dialysis with NxStage System One cycler (NSO) has become increasingly popular as home hemodialysis prescription. Short dialysis sessions with NSO might not allow adequate phosphate (P) removal.

METHODS

Single-session and weekly balances of P and calcium (Ca) were compared in 14 patients treated with NSO (6 sessions/week) and in 14 patients on standard bicarbonate dialysis (BHD).

RESULTS

NSO and BHD showed similar plasma P fall, with end-dialysis plasma P slightly lower in BHD (2.2 ± 0.5 vs. 2.7 ± 0.8 mg/dL, p < 0.02). Single-session P removal was lower in NSO, but weekly removal was higher (3,488 ± 1,181 mg vs. 2,634 ± 878, p < 0.003). Plasma Ca increase was lower in NSO, with similar PTH fall. Ca balance varied according to start plasma Ca, dialysate to blood Ca gradient and net ultrafiltration.

CONCLUSIONS

short, frequent home hemodialysis with NSO, on a 6/week-based prescription, allows higher weekly P removal than BHD. With the dialysate Ca concentration in use (6 mg/dL), total plasma Ca and iCa concentration increase is lower in NSO.