Keeping All the PIECES: Phylogenetically Informed Ex Situ Conservation of Endangered Species

Ecological life strategies of microbes in response to antibiotics as a driving factor in soils

Antibiotics as a selection pressure driving the evolution of soil microbial communities is not well understood. Since microbial functions govern ecosystem services, an ecological framework is required to understand and predict antibiotic-induced functional and structural changes in microbial communities. Therefore, metagenomic studies explaining the impacts of antibiotics on soil microbial communities were mined, and alterations in microbial taxa were analyzed through an ecological lens using Grimes's Competitor-Stress tolerator-Ruderal (CSR) model. We propose considering antibiotics as the primary abiotic factor mentioned in the CSR model and classifying non-susceptible microbial taxa as degraders, resistant, and resilient groups analogous to competitors, stress tolerators, and ruderal strategists, respectively. Firmicutes, Bacteroidetes, Actinobacteria, and Proteobacteria were among the phyla harboring most members with antibiotic-resistant groups. However, some antibiotic-resistant microbes in these phyla could not only tolerate but also subsist solely on antibiotics, while others degraded antibiotics as a part of secondary metabolism. Irrespective of their taxonomic affiliation, microbes with each life strategy displayed similar phenotypic characteristics. Therefore, it is recommended to consider microbial functional traits associated with each life strategy while analyzing the ecological impacts of antibiotics. Also, potential ecological crises posed by antibiotics through changes in microbial community and ecosystem functions were visualized. Applying ecological theory to understand and predict antibiotics-induced changes in microbial communities will also provide better insight into microbial behavior in the background of emerging contaminants and help develop a robust ecological classification system of microbes.

Land-use trade-offs between tree biodiversity and crop production in the Atlantic Forest

Trade-offs in ecosystem services (ES) have received increasing attention because provisioning services often come at the expense of biodiversity loss. When land-use patterns are not maximally efficient relative to productivity, provisioning services, such as crop production, can often be increased without losing biodiversity. The Atlantic Forest (AF) encompasses dense, mixed, and seasonal forests and has high levels of endemism and anthropogenic threat. We examined trade-offs between biodiversity and crop production in the AF to provide insights into land-use management decisions. We developed a biodiversity metric that combines information on tree species richness, evolutionary distinctiveness, and rarity at the local level. We examined the extent to which the nature of ES trade-offs differ among the 3 forest types. We assessed how annual deforestation rates and land management practices affect biodiversity and agricultural revenues. Finally, we tested whether it is possible to achieve the same total regional revenue without reducing biodiversity by improving local management practices. The 3 forest types had similar patterns in ES trade-offs, although within mixed forest patterns differed. Biodiversity appeared to be more sensitive to land-use change than crop revenues. Certain crops yielded up to 10 times higher values in some sites. Enhanced crop productivity may increase revenues without reducing biodiversity. Our results showed that to enhance human well-being without further conversion of AF, maximizing crop productivity is needed . Increasing efficiency of management outcomes by maintaining higher biodiversity and increasing provisioning services depends on knowledge of forest type, the comparative advantage of planting crops in the best places, and preserving species in a balanced manner across forests.