First-Generation Versus Second-Generation Drug-Eluting Stents in Coronary Chronic Total Occlusions: Two-Year Results of a Multicenter Registry

Comparison of Clinical Outcomes Between Second-and First-Generation Drug-Eluting Stents in Patients With Chronic Total Occlusion Lesion: A Meta-Analysis

Background and Objectives: The second-generation drug-eluting stents have been used to treat chronic total occlusion lesion. However, there is limited evidence of the clinical outcomes that whether the second-generation drug-eluting stents is superior to first-generation ones in patients with chronic total occlusion lesion undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention. The study aimed to compare the differences in clinical outcomes between the two generations drug-eluting stents in patients with those by a meta-analysis.

Methods: PubMed, Embase, the Cochrane library and Web of science databases were systemically searched before March, 2021. Randomized controlled trials and observational studies were included to compare the second-generation drug-eluting stents with the first-generation ones in patients with chronic total occlusion lesion undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention. The clinical outcomes were major adverse cardiac events (MACE), target vessel revascularization, myocardial infarction, all-cause death. Fixed effects models were used to calculate the odds ratio (OR) and 95% confidence interval (CI) of each clinical outcome. Sensitivity analysis was performed to detect potential sources of heterogeneity. Subgroup analyses were used to assess the differential effects.

Results: The meta-analysis included eight studies involving 4,583 patients with chronic total occlusion lesion undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention. Pooled analysis showed that the incidence of MACE (OR = 0.68, 95%CI 0.54–0.85, P = 0.0008), target vessel revascularization (OR = 0.70, 95%CI 0.54–0.91, P = 0.007), and myocardial infarction (OR = 0.58, 95%CI 0.37–0.93, P = 0.02) were lower in the second-generation drug-eluting stents compared with the first-generation ones. However, there was not difference in all-cause deaths between two drug-eluting stents (OR = 0.67, 95%CI 0.45–1.01, P = 0.05).

Conclusions: The second-generation drug-eluting stents are associated with lower MACE, target vessel revascularization, and myocardial infarction compared with the first-generation ones in patients with chronic total occlusion lesion undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention. The results of this study can provide a reference for the selection of stents in patients with chronic total occlusion lesion. Further randomized controlled trials are needed to verify that the second-generation drug-eluting stents is superior to the first-generation ones in patients with chronic total occlusion (Registered by PROSPERO, CRD42020158406).

Efficacy and Safety of Xinyue Capsule for Coronary Artery Disease after Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Clinical Trials

To evaluate the efficacy and safety of Xinyue capsule (XYC) in the treatment of coronary artery disease (CAD) after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), databases including MEDLINE, EMBASE (Ovid), PubMed, Google Scholar, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), China National Knowledge Infrastructure database (CNKI), Wanfang, and VIP were searched to identify randomized controlled trials (RCTs) on XYC in CAD after PCI published before October 2020. Data extraction, methodological quality assessment, and data analysis were performed according to the Cochrane standard. Dichotomous data were shown as risk ratios (RRs) with a 95% confidence interval (CI). All analyses were done with Review Manager, version 5.3. The quality of evidence was assessed by the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) approach. A total of 9 related studies from 166 related articles were identified, which included 2979 patients. Compared with conventional treatment alone (or placebo plus), XYC decreased cardiovascular events [RR = 0.37, 95% CI (0.27, 0.51), I 2 = 0%] (nonfatal myocardial infarction [RR = 0.26, 95% CI (0.10, 0.70), I 2 = 0%], revascularization [RR = 0.38, 95% CI (0.24, 0.61), I 2 = 0%], and rehospitalization due to ACS [RR = 0.48, 95% CI (0.33, 0.68), I 2 = 0%]) and improved cardiac function (LVEF [RR = 6.93, 95% CI (4.99, 8.87), I 2 = 81%], LVEDV [RR = -4.07, 95% CI (-5.61, -2.54), I 2 = 7%], and LVESV [RR = -4.32, 95% CI (-5.90, -2.74), I 2 = 50%]) in patients after PCI. In addition, XYC reduced serum NT-pro-BNP [RR = -126.91, 95% CI (-231.51, -22.31), I 2 = 69%]. However, XYC had little effect on cardiovascular death [RR = 0.47, 95% CI (0.13, 1.68), I 2 = 0%], stroke [RR = 0.52, 95% CI (0.23, 1.20), I 2 = 0%], heart failure [RR = 0.53, 95% CI (0.24, 1.20), I 2 = 0%], and quality of life [RR = -1.37, 95% CI (-4.97, 2.22), I 2 = 93%]. Thus, this meta-analysis suggests that XYC has potential advantages in reducing the occurrence of cardiovascular events after PCI, improving cardiac function, and reducing serum NT-pro-BNP. This potential benefit requires a high-quality RCT to assess.

Factors Influencing Stent Failure in Chronic Total Occlusion Coronary Intervention

Stent failure remains one of the greatest challenges for interventional cardiologists. Despite the evolution to superior second- and third-generation drug-eluting stent designs, increasing use of intracoronary imaging and the adoption of more potent antiplatelet regimens, registries continue to demonstrate a prevalence of stent failure or target lesion revascularisation of 15-20%. Predisposition to stent failure is consistent across both chronic total occlusion (CTO) and non-CTO populations and includes patient-, lesion- and procedure-related factors. However, histological and pathophysiological properties specific to CTOs, alongside complex strategies to treat these lesions, may potentially render percutaneous coronary interventions in this cohort more vulnerable to failure. Prevention requires recognition and mitigation of the precipitants of stent failure, optimisation of interventional techniques, including image-guided precision percutaneous coronary intervention, and aggressive modification of a patient's cardiovascular risk factors. Management of stent failure in the CTO population is technically challenging and itself begets recurrence. We aim to provide a comprehensive review of factors influencing stent failure in the CTO population and strategies to attenuate these.

Second-generation drug-eluting stenting versus coronary artery bypass grafting for treatment of coronary chronic total occlusion

BACKGROUND

Limited data are available regarding the long-term clinical outcomes of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) using second-generation drug-eluting stents (DESs) versus coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) for the treatment of coronary artery disease (CAD) with chronic total occlusion (CTO). We compared the clinical outcomes of patients with multivessel CAD including CTO lesions treated with PCI using DESs versus CABG.

METHODS

We analyzed data from 423 consecutive patients who underwent successful revascularization for CTO between March 2008 and February 2012. Death or myocardial infarction (MI) and major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events (MACCE) were compared between patients treated with PCI using second-generation DESs (n=232, 2nd DES group) versus those treated with CABG (n=191, CABG group). To reduce selection bias according to treatment strategy and other potential confounding factors, inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) was also performed.

RESULTS

During a median follow-up duration of 32 months, there was no significant difference in death or MI [hazard ratio (HR): 0.69; 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.29-1.63; p=0.399] or MACCE (HR: 1.32; 95% CI: 0.74-2.35; p=0.341) between the 2nd DES group and the CABG group based on multivariable analysis. After IPTW adjustment, the incidences of death or MI (HR: 0.72; 95% CI: 0.26-1.95; p=0.518) and MACCE (HR: 1.49; 95% CI: 0.76-2.91; p=0.244) remained similar in the two groups. In subgroup analysis, the effect of second-generation drug-eluting stenting was comparable to that of CABG across various subgroups without a significant p-value for the interaction.

CONCLUSIONS

The efficacy of PCI using second-generation DES was comparable to that of CABG in CTO patients with multivessel CAD.

Impact of lesion complexity on long-term vascular response to cobalt-chromium everolimus-eluting stent: five-year follow-up optical coherence tomography study

The impact of lesion complexity on long-term vascular response to cobalt-chromium everolimus-eluting stent (CoCrEES) remains unclear. We sought to evaluate them using optical coherence tomography (OCT). A total of 47 patients with 58 lesions treated only with CoCrEES and no target-vessel events within 5 years after implantation were prospectively enrolled and underwent 5-year follow-up OCT. Quantitative parameters and qualitative characteristics of the neointima were evaluated using multilevel logistic or linear regression models with random effects at three levels: lesion, cross-section (CS), and strut. According to the lesion complexity, the lesions were classified into the two groups: the complex lesion (CL) and non-CL group. The CL was defined as having at least 1 high-risk feature such as acute coronary syndrome lesion, lesion length > 20 mm, severe calcification requiring rotational atherectomy, and chronic total occlusion at the index procedure. A total of 11,034 struts (CL, n = 6240; non-CL, n = 4794) and 1202 (CL, n = 683; non-CL, n = 519) CSs were analyzed. The percentage of uncovered and malapposed struts did not differ significantly between the CL and non-CL groups (0.90 vs. 0.54%, P = 0.78; 0.56 vs. 0.10%, P = 0.16, respectively). The incidence of neoatherosclerosis was comparable between both groups in the CS- and lesion-level analysis (3.5 vs. 4.6%, P = 0.91; 32.0 vs. 24.2%, P = 0.52, respectively). At 5 years, CoCrEES shows an excellent vascular healing and similar frequency of neoatheroslerosis in patients without target-vessel events, regardless of the lesion complexity.

Predictors of poor clinical outcomes after successful chronic total occlusion intervention with drug-eluting stents

BACKGROUND

The aim of this study was to identify the prognostic predictors for the worse clinical outcomes after a successful chronic total occlusion (CTO) intervention with drug-eluting stents.

PATIENTS AND RESULTS

A total of 2334 patients in the multicenter Korean CTO registry who underwent a successful CTO intervention with drug-eluting stents (first generation, 1367, new generation, 967) were enrolled. The primary endpoint was the composite of cardiac death, myocardial infarction, and stent thrombosis.The cumulative incidence of the primary endpoint was 2.5% (median follow-up duration: 22 months). In multivariate analysis, age above 65 years [hazard ratio (HR)=1.769, 95% confidence interval (CI)=1.025-3.052, P=0.041], heart failure (HR=4.242, 95% CI=2.335-7.705, P<0.001), and diabetes (HR=1.773, 95% CI=1.043-3.012, P=0.034) were the significant predictors. The cumulative incidence of the primary endpoint was significantly higher in patients with three risk factors (19.1%) than in those with one (2.2%) or two (3.0%) risk factors (P=0.001). The cumulative target-vessel revascularization rate was 8.4%, with the significant predictors being a diffuse long lesion (HR=1.626, 95% CI=1.129-2.340, P=0.009) and at least three implanted stents (HR=1.964, 95% CI=1.301-2.965, P=0.001).

CONCLUSION

Clinical parameters such as age, diabetes, and heart failure were independent predictors of the composite of cardiac death, myocardial infarction, and stent thrombosis, whereas angiographic or procedural parameters such as lesion length and number of implanted stents were predictors of target-vessel revascularization. Clinical outcomes after CTO intervention were worse in patients with multiple risk factors.