Clinical Outcomes and Women's Experiences before and after the Introduction of Mifepristone into Second-Trimester Medical Abortion Services in South Africa

Outpatient medical management of later second trimester abortion (18-23.6 weeks) with procedural evacuation backup: A large case series

Objective

Document the clinical outcomes of an outpatient medical management with procedural evacuation backup procedure for abortions between 18 weeks zero days to 23 weeks six days gestation.

Study design

We conducted a retrospective medical records review of adult patients who received mifepristone and repeated misoprostol for second trimester abortion with procedural evacuation backup at an Arizona clinic between October 2017 and November 2021. We extracted patient demographics; pregnancy and medical history; and preoperative, intraoperative, and postoperative data. We assessed abortion outcomes, including procedure timing, mode of completion (medication alone or medications and procedural evacuation), and safety.

Results

All 359 patients had a complete abortion with 63.5% of patients completing with medication alone and 36.5% with procedural evacuation backup. The median time from first dose of misoprostol to fetal expulsion was six hours, among those who completed the abortion with medications alone. Of those who received procedural evacuation as backup, the median time for procedural evacuation was 10 minutes. The vast majority of patients (99.4%) did not have any adverse events. Two safety incidents (0.6%) occurred, a broad right ligament tear and a uterine rupture.

Conclusion

Patients in one outpatient setting safely and effectively received medical management of second trimester abortion with procedural evacuation backup, and two thirds completed with medications alone.

Implications

Outpatient settings may consider medical management of abortion between 18 and 24 weeks with procedural evacuation back-up as a safe, effective, and manageable second trimester abortion option. Additional research is needed on patient experience and satisfaction.

"Clandestine" home delivery with mifepristone

Denial of pregnancy is a rare psychic process associated with an increased risk of infant death. Forensic examinations to determine viability at birth can heavily influence the legal proceedings in cases of clandestine deliveries that result in the death of the infant. A 32-year-old woman who experienced a denial of pregnancy up to 30 weeks of amenorrhea reported giving birth at home at an estimated term of 35 weeks of amenorrhea. No one witnessed the delivery. She claimed the infant was stillborn. Forensic examinations revealed characteristic features of a live born infant. The mother tested positive for mifepristone. Mifepristone is an anti-progestin drug used for early abortion and to induce labor in cases of in-utero fetal death in later pregnancy. Even if mifepristone crosses the placenta, it has no direct toxic effect on the fetus. Our observations suggest premature live birth caused by mifepristone, followed by asphyxia due to meconium inhalation syndrome associated with lung immaturity especially since the birth occurred at home and no medical care was provided after the birth. The tragic outcome of this clinical case calls for vigilance and global management, including the psychiatric care of parturients in the context of late discovery of pregnancy. In France, this situation showed a legal gap between the consideration of the fetus and laws concerning abortion. To our knowledge, in France, this case has allowed the court to set a legal precedent as a similar case had never been reported elsewhere.

Mifepristone-Misoprostol Use for Second and Third Trimester Medical Termination of Pregnancy in a Canadian Tertiary Care Centre

OBJECTIVE

This study aims to evaluate the impact of the implementation a mifepristone-misoprostol protocol (MIFE/MISO) on the induction-to-expulsion interval in the context of second- and third-trimester pregnancy termination or intrauterine fetal death (IUFD) compared with misoprostol alone (MISO), and to share the experience of a Canadian tertiary hospital concerning the feasibility and safety of such a protocol.

METHODS

This is a single-centre retrospective pre-post cohort study carried out at the Centre Hospitalier Universitaire (CHU) Sainte-Justine between 2017 and 2019. Women in the MIFE/MISO group were instructed to take mifepristone 24-48 hours before induction. Induction in the MIFE/MISO group was performed with misoprostol dosages adjusted to gestational age and the presence of previous uterine scars, while, in the MISO group, all patients received 400 μg of misoprostol vaginally every 4 hours.

RESULTS

Ninety-four patients were included in the MIFE/MISO group and 103 patients, in the MISO group. Median time to expulsion was significantly lower in the MIFE/MISO group than the MISO group (13.5 and 19.5 h respectively; P < 0.001). The total dose of misoprostol administered was significantly lower in the MIFE/MISO group than the MISO group, and adverse effects were reported in 60% and 82% of patient records, respectively (P < 0.001). Complication rates were similar between the two groups.

CONCLUSION

The MIFE/MISO protocol is highly effective for second- and third-trimester induction for pregnancy termination or IUFD, without increasing complication rates and with fewer reported adverse effects. Its implementation is safe and feasible in a tertiary medical centre.

Could routine pregnancy self-testing facilitate earlier recognition of unintended pregnancy? A feasibility study among South African women

INTRODUCTION

We explored whether routine pregnancy self-testing is feasible and acceptable to women at risk of late recognition of pregnancy as a strategy to facilitate early entry into either antenatal or abortion care.

METHODS

A feasibility study among South African sexually active women not desiring pregnancy within 1 year, and not using long-acting or injectable contraceptives. At recruitment, we provided five free urine pregnancy tests for self-testing on the first day of each of the next 3 months. We sent monthly text reminders to use the tests with requests for no-cost text replies. Our main outcome was the proportion of participants self-testing within 5 days of the text reminder over three consecutive months. Other outcomes were ease of use of tests, preference for self-testing versus clinic testing, acceptability of routine self-testing (all binary responses followed by open response options) and response to text messages (four-point Likert scale).

RESULTS

We followed up 71/76 (93%) participants. Two confirmed new pregnancies at the first scheduled test and completed exit interviews, and 64/69 (93%) self-reported completing all three monthly tests. Self-testing was easy to do (66/71, 93%); advantages were convenience (21/71, 30%) and privacy (18/71, 25%), while the main disadvantage was no nurse present to advise (17/71, 24%). Most would recommend monthly testing (70/71, 99%). Text reminders were generally not bothersome (57/71, 80%); 35/69 (51%) participants replied with test results over all three months.

CONCLUSION

Providing free pregnancy tests to women at risk of late recognition of pregnancy is feasible to strengthen early confirmation of pregnancy status.

Abortion Care Beyond 13 Weeks' Gestation: A Global Perspective

The majority of abortions are performed early in pregnancy, but later abortion accounts for a large proportion of abortion-related morbidity and mortality. People who need this care are often the most vulnerable-the poor, the young, those who experience violence, and those with significant health issues. In settings with access to safe care, studies demonstrate significant declines in abortion-related morbidity and mortality. This review focuses on evidence-based practices for induced abortion beyond 13 weeks' gestation and post-abortion care in both high- and low-resource settings. We also highlight key programmatic issues to consider when expanding the gestational age for abortion services.

Mifepristone-misoprostol versus misoprostol-alone regimen for medication abortion at ≥24 weeks' gestation

OBJECTIVE

To compare time from misoprostol initiation to fetal expulsion for mifepristone-misoprostol versus misoprostol-alone regimens of medication abortion performed at ≥24 weeks' gestation.

STUDY DESIGN

We conducted a retrospective study of medication abortion performed at ≥24 weeks' gestation between May 2016 and January 2018 at one site, comparing outcomes of patients receiving mifepristone-misoprostol versus misoprostol alone during two periods. All patients received feticidal injection and laminaria; the mifepristone-misoprostol group also received mifepristone 200 mg orally around the time of initial laminaria. Beginning 24-72 h later (depending on cervical assessment), both groups received misoprostol buccally every two hours.

RESULTS

Analyses included 257 patients in the mifepristone-misoprostol group and 152 patients in the misoprostol-alone group. Median time from misoprostol initiation to fetal expulsion was similar between groups (4.8 h vs. 4.9 h; p = 0.43). Patients in the mifepristone-misoprostol group received less misoprostol overall (median [IQR]: 800 mcg [800-1200 mcg] vs. 1200 mcg [800-1600 mcg]; p < 0.01) and fewer patients received a second round of laminaria (n = 56, 22% vs. n = 58, 33%; p < 0.01) than the misoprostol-alone group. Seven patients (2%) were transferred to a hospital for complications; this proportion did not vary by regimen.

CONCLUSIONS

Addition of mifepristone was not associated with a reduction in induction interval at ≥24 weeks. However, patients in the mifepristone-misoprostol group received a lower total dose of misoprostol and were less likely to require two days of laminaria. The clinical significance of these differences is unclear, but may have implications for patient experience. Both regimens had low rates of complications.

IMPLICATIONS

A randomized controlled trial comparing the mifepristone-misoprostol and misoprostol-alone regimens at ≥24 weeks is needed, as is evidence on patient perspectives on these regimens. Given the existing evidence, either regimen is reasonable.

No. 360-Induced Abortion: Surgical Abortion and Second Trimester Medical Methods

OBJECTIVE

This guideline reviews evidence relating to the provision of surgical induced abortion (IA) and second trimester medical abortion, including pre- and post-procedural care.

INTENDED USERS

Gynaecologists, family physicians, nurses, midwives, residents, and other health care providers who currently or intend to provide and/or teach IAs.

TARGET POPULATION

Women with an unintended or abnormal first or second trimester pregnancy.

EVIDENCE

PubMed, Medline, and the Cochrane Database were searched using the key words: first-trimester surgical abortion, second-trimester surgical abortion, second-trimester medical abortion, dilation and evacuation, induction abortion, feticide, cervical preparation, cervical dilation, abortion complications. Results were restricted to English or French systematic reviews, randomized controlled trials, clinical trials, and observational studies published from 1979 to July 2017. National and international clinical practice guidelines were consulted for review. Grey literature was not searched.

VALUES

The quality of evidence in this document was rated using the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) methodology framework. The summary of findings is available upon request.

BENEFITS, HARMS, AND/OR COSTS

IA is safe and effective. The benefits of IA outweigh the potential harms or costs. No new direct harms or costs identified with these guidelines.

Providing safe abortion services: Experiences and perspectives of providers in South Africa

Despite abortion being legally available on request up to and including the gestational age of 12 weeks in South Africa, barriers to access remain. Barriers include provider opposition to abortion and a shortage of trained and willing providers, which has implications for access to safe abortion services. Exploring the factors that determine providers' levels of involvement in abortion services can facilitate improvements in service provision. Providers' conceptualizations of abortion are influenced by numerous factors, including moral and religious views, in which abortion is perceived by some as a sin, whereas others view access to safe abortions as an important component of a woman's right to reproductive autonomy and choice. Barriers to service provision include limited abortion and values clarification training and misinterpretation of conscientious objection. Providers have difficulties with the emotional and visual impact of second trimester abortions. There is an urgent need to address provider shortage, and abortion education and training need to be included in medical and nursing curricula to ensure sustaining abortion services.

Current and potential methods for second trimester abortion

Medical and surgical methods can both be recommended for second trimester abortion (after 12-weeks of gestational age). Induced abortion with a mifepristone and misoprostol regimen is the preferred approach; where mifepristone is not available, misoprostol alone for medical abortion is also effective. Dilation and evacuation (D&E) is the procedure of choice for surgical abortions, and adequate cervical preparation contributes significantly to safety. Availability of drugs and instruments, ability to provide pain control, provider skill and comfort, client preference, cultural considerations, and local legislation all influence the method of abortion likely to be performed in a given setting. Both surgical and modern medical methods are safe and effective when provided by a trained, experienced provider.

An analysis of delays among women accessing second-trimester abortion in the public sector in South Africa

OBJECTIVES

To identify key delays and associated factors in women's pathway to second-trimester abortion that could inform strategies to increase earlier presentation.

STUDY DESIGN

We performed a secondary analysis using data collected from May 2012 to June 2013 as part of a randomized controlled trial among women having abortion at 13.0-20.0 weeks at a public hospital in South Africa. We used ultrasound and participant interview data to calculate 3 key intervals: (1) conception to suspicion of pregnancy, (2) suspicion to first healthcare visit for abortion, and (3) first healthcare visit to abortion procedure. We compared intervals for women at 13-15.0 weeks versus 15.1-20.0 weeks gestation at abortion using Wilcoxon rank-sum tests and tested for associations between gestational age at key events using multivariable linear regression.

RESULTS

Median (interquartile range[IQR]) durations for the 3 intervals among women at 13-15 weeks (n=93) compared to 15.1-20 weeks (n=63) gestation were: (1) 36 days (IQR 21-53 days) versus 62 days (36-71 days), p<.001; (2) 29 days (IQR 15-46 days) versus 23 days (IQR 11-39 days), p=.64; (3) 14 days (IQR 7-21 days) versus 14 days (IQR 12-21 days), p=.32. Multivariable logistic regression showed marginal associations between gestational age at suspicion of pregnancy and no prior pregnancy (aOR=3.8, 95% CI 1.0-14.6) and living in informal housing (aOR=3.1, 95% CI 1.0-9.1). Gestational age on the day of the abortion procedure was significantly associated with living in informal housing (aOR=3.1, 95% CI 1.4-6.6).

CONCLUSION

The only differences in delay in obtaining second trimester abortion between South African women having an earlier and later second trimester procedure is due to longer time to suspect pregnancy.

IMPLICATIONS

Interventions to improve early pregnancy recognition should be explored and referral processes should be streamlined to avoid unnecessary delays accessing abortion care and possibly reduce the proportion of abortions performed later in the second trimester in South Africa.

Update on second trimester medical abortion

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

To review recent literature on second trimester abortion with medical methods.

RECENT FINDINGS

Across studies published in the recent past, it is apparent that women prefer shorter procedures and procedure times. Several randomized controlled trials have confirmed adding mifepristone to the second trimester medication abortion regimen results in shorter abortion intervals from first misoprostol administration to complete fetal expulsion. A study of simultaneous administration of mifepristone and misoprostol yielded shorter mean 'total' abortion times, presenting several logistical advantages. Recent studies on the continuous dosing of misoprostol have produced critical evidence to support continued dosing until expulsion. These studies had a more practical design compared with previous protocols that capped the number of misoprostol doses.

SUMMARY

Second trimester surgical abortion is well tolerated and increasingly expeditious. Further research is needed to refine second trimester medical abortion methods, specific to the mifepristone, misoprostol dosing interval. A 12-hour mifepristone to misoprostol interval may be the optimal interval balancing patient preferences and logistical considerations. Pragmatic dosing, including continuous dosing of misoprostol, could yield results that better inform clinical guidelines and reduce burden on patient, provider, and health facility.

The costs and cost effectiveness of providing second-trimester medical and surgical safe abortion services in Western Cape Province, South Africa

Background

In South Africa, access to second-trimester abortion services, which are generally performed using medical induction with misoprostol alone, is challenging for many women. We aimed to estimate the costs and cost effectiveness of providing three safe second-trimester abortion services (dilation and evacuation (D&E)), medical induction with mifepristone and misoprostol (MI-combined), or medical induction with misoprostol alone (MI-misoprostol)) in Western Cape Province, South Africa to aid policymakers with planning for service provision in South Africa and similar settings.

Methods

We derived clinical outcomes data for this economic evaluation from two previously conducted clinical studies. In 2013–2014, we collected cost data from three public hospitals where the studies took place. We collected cost data from the health service perspective through micro-costing activities, including discussions with site staff. We used decision tree analysis to estimate average costs per patient interaction (e.g. first visit, procedure visit, etc.), the total average cost per procedure, and cost-effectiveness in terms of the cost per complete abortion. We discounted equipment costs at 3%, and present the results in 2015 US dollars.

Results

D&E services were the least costly and the most cost-effective at $91.17 per complete abortion. MI-combined was also less costly and more cost-effective (at $298.03 per complete abortion) than MI-misoprostol (at $375.31 per complete abortion), in part due to a shortened inpatient stay. However, an overlap in the plausible cost ranges for the two medical procedures suggests that the two may have equivalent costs in some circumstances.

Conclusion

D&E was most cost-effective in this analysis. However, due to resistance from health care providers and other barriers, these services are not widely available and scale-up is challenging. Given South Africa’s reliance on medical induction, switching to the combined regimen could result in greater access to second-trimester services due to shorter inpatient stays without increasing costs.

Doing more for less: identifying opportunities to expand public sector access to safe abortion in South Africa through budget impact analysis

OBJECTIVE(S)

To estimate the costs of public-sector abortion provision in South Africa and to explore the potential for expanding access at reduced cost by changing the mix of technologies used.

STUDY DESIGN

We conducted a budget impact analysis using public sector abortion statistics and published cost data. We estimated the total costs to the public health service over 10 years, starting in South Africa's financial year 2016/17, given four scenarios: (1) holding service provision constant, (2) expanding public sector provision, (3) changing the abortion technologies used (i.e. the method mix), and (4) expansion plus changing the method mix.

RESULTS

The public sector performed an estimated 20% of the expected total number of abortions in 2016/17; 26% and 54% of all abortions were performed illegally or in the private sector respectively. Costs were lowest in scenarios where method mix shifting occurred. Holding the proportion of abortions performed in the public-sector constant, shifting to more cost-effective service provision (more first-trimester services with more medication abortion and using the combined regimen for medical induction in the second trimester) could result in savings of $28.1 million in the public health service over the 10-year period. Expanding public sector provision through elimination of unsafe abortions would require an additional $192.5 million.

CONCLUSIONS

South Africa can provide more safe abortions for less money in the public sector through shifting the methods provided. More research is needed to understand whether the cost of expanding access could be offset by savings from averting costs of managing unsafe abortions.

IMPLICATIONS

South Africa can provide more safe abortions for less money in the public sector through shifting to more first-trimester methods, including more medication abortion, and shifting to a combined mifepristone plus misoprostol regimen for second trimester medical induction. Expanding access in addition to method mix changes would require additional funds.