Motor Experience Reprograms Development of a Genetically-Altered Bilateral Corticospinal Motor Circuit

EphA4 Is Required for Neural Circuits Controlling Skilled Reaching

Skilled forelimb movements are initiated by feedforward motor commands conveyed by supraspinal motor pathways. The accuracy of reaching and grasping relies on internal feedback pathways that update ongoing motor commands. In mice lacking the axon guidance molecule EphA4, axonal misrouting of the corticospinal tract and spinal interneurons is manifested, leading to a hopping gait in hindlimbs. Moreover, mice with a conditional forebrain deletion of EphA4, display forelimb hopping in adaptive locomotion and exploratory reaching movements. However, it remains unclear how loss of EphA4 signaling disrupts function of forelimb motor circuit and skilled reaching and grasping movements. Here we investigated how neural circuits controlling skilled reaching were affected by the loss of EphA4. Both male and female C57BL/6 wild-type, heterozygous EphA4^+/-, and homozygous EphA4^-/- mice were used in behavioral and in vivo electrophysiological investigations. We found that EphA4 knock-out (-/-) mice displayed impaired goal-directed reaching movements. In vivo intracellular recordings from forelimb motor neurons demonstrated increased corticoreticulospinal excitation, decreased direct reticulospinal excitation, and reduced direct propriospinal excitation in EphA4 knock-out mice. Cerebellar surface recordings showed a functional perturbation of the lateral reticular nucleus-cerebellum internal feedback pathway in EphA4 knock-out mice. Together, our findings provide in vivo evidence at the circuit level that loss of EphA4 disrupts the function of both feedforward and feedback motor pathways, resulting in deficits in skilled reaching.SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT The central advances of this study are the demonstration that null mutation in the axon guidance molecule EphA4 gene impairs the ability of mice to perform skilled reaching, and identification of how these behavioral deficits correlates with discrete neurophysiological changes in central motor pathways involved in the control of reaching. Our findings provide in vivo evidence at the circuit level that loss of EphA4 disrupts both feedforward and feedback motor pathways, resulting in deficits in skilled reaching. This analysis of motor circuit function may help to understand the pathophysiological mechanisms underlying movement disorders in humans.

Rodent Models of Developmental Ischemic Stroke for Translational Research: Strengths and Weaknesses

Cerebral ischemia can occur at any stage in life, but clinical consequences greatly differ depending on the developmental stage of the affected brain structures. Timing of the lesion occurrence seems to be critical, as it strongly interferes with neuronal circuit development and determines the way spontaneous plasticity takes place. Translational stroke research requires the use of animal models as they represent a reliable tool to understand the pathogenic mechanisms underlying the generation, progression, and pathological consequences of a stroke. Moreover, in vivo experiments are instrumental to investigate new therapeutic strategies and the best temporal window of intervention. Differently from adults, very few models of the human developmental stroke have been characterized, and most of them have been established in rodents. The models currently used provide a better understanding of the molecular factors involved in the effects of ischemia; however, they still hold many limitations due to matching developmental stages across different species and the complexity of the human disorder that hardly can be described by segregated variables. In this review, we summarize the key factors contributing to neonatal brain vulnerability to ischemic strokes and we provide an overview of the advantages and limitations of the currently available models to recapitulate different aspects of the human developmental stroke.

Plasticity in One Hemisphere, Control From Two: Adaptation in Descending Motor Pathways After Unilateral Corticospinal Injury in Neonatal Rats

After injury to the corticospinal tract (CST) in early development there is large-scale adaptation of descending motor pathways. Some studies suggest the uninjured hemisphere controls the impaired forelimb, while others suggest that the injured hemisphere does; these pathways have never been compared directly. We tested the contribution of each motor cortex to the recovery forelimb function after neonatal injury of the CST. We cut the left pyramid (pyramidotomy) of postnatal day 7 rats, which caused a measurable impairment of the right forelimb. We used pharmacological inactivation of each motor cortex to test its contribution to a skilled reach and supination task. Rats with neonatal pyramidotomy were further impaired by inactivation of motor cortex in both the injured and the uninjured hemispheres, while the forelimb of uninjured rats was impaired only from the contralateral motor cortex. Thus, inactivation demonstrated motor control from each motor cortex. In contrast, physiological and anatomical interrogation of these pathways support adaptations only in the uninjured hemisphere. Intracortical microstimulation of motor cortex in the uninjured hemisphere of rats with neonatal pyramidotomy produced responses from both forelimbs, while stimulation of the injured hemisphere did not elicit responses from either forelimb. Both anterograde and retrograde tracers were used to label corticofugal pathways. There was no increased plasticity from the injured hemisphere, either from cortex to the red nucleus or the red nucleus to the spinal cord. In contrast, there were very strong CST connections to both halves of the spinal cord from the uninjured motor cortex. Retrograde tracing produced maps of each forelimb within the uninjured hemisphere, and these were partly segregated. This suggests that the uninjured hemisphere may encode separate control of the unimpaired and the impaired forelimbs of rats with neonatal pyramidotomy.

Neurophysiological mechanisms and functional impact of mirror movements in children with unilateral spastic cerebral palsy

Children with unilateral spastic cerebral palsy (CP) often have mirror movements, i.e. involuntary imitations of unilateral voluntary movements of the contralateral upper extremity. The pathophysiology of mirror movements has been investigated in small and heterogeneous cohorts in the literature. Specific pathophysiology of mirror movements and their impact on upper extremity function require systematic investigation in larger and homogeneous cohorts of children with unilateral spastic CP. Here we review two possible neurophysiological mechanisms underlying mirror movements in children with CP and those with typical development: (1) an ipsilateral corticospinal tract projecting from the contralesional motor cortex (M1) to both upper extremities; (2) insufficient interhemispheric inhibition between the two M1s. We also discuss clinical implications of mirror movements in children with unilateral CP and suggest that a thorough examination of the relationship between the pathophysiology and clinical manifestations of mirror movements is warranted. We suggest two premises: (1) the presence of mirror movements is indicative of an ipsilateral corticospinal tract reorganization; and (2) the corticospinal tract organization may affect patients' responses to certain treatment. If these premises are supported through future research, mirror movements should be clinically evaluated for patient selection to maximize benefits of therapy, hence promoting individualized medicine in this population.

WHAT THIS PAPER ADDS

Mirror movements may be indicative of the underlying corticospinal tract reorganization in children with unilateral spastic cerebral palsy (CP). Future research will benefit from systematic investigations of the relationship between mirror movements and its pathophysiology. Mirror movements may be a potential biomarker for individualized medicine in children with unilateral spastic CP.

Motor system plasticity after unilateral injury in the developing brain

In maturity, motor skills depend on the corticospinal tract (CST) and brainstem pathways that together synapse on interneurons and motoneurons in the spinal cord. Descending signals to spinal neurons that mediate voluntary control can be distinguished from peripheral sensory signals, primarily for feedback control. These motor system circuits depend initially on developmental genetic mechanisms to establish their connections and neural activity- and use-dependent synaptic refinement during the early postnatal period to enable motor skills to develop. In this review we consider four key activity-dependent developmental mechanisms that provide insights into how the motor systems establish the proper connections for skilled movement control and how the same mechanisms also inform the mechanisms of motor impairments and developmental plasticity after corticospinal system injury: (1) synaptic competition between the CSTs from each hemisphere; (2) interactions between the CST and spinal cord neurons; (3) synaptic competition between the CST and proprioceptive sensory fibres; and (4) interactions between the developing corticospinal motor system and the rubrospinal tract. Our findings suggest that the corticospinal motor system effectively 'oversees' development of its subcortical targets through synaptic competition and trophic-like interactions and this has important implications for motor impairments after perinatal cortical stroke.

WHAT THIS PAPER ADDS

Neural activity-dependent processes inform the brain and spinal cord response to injury. The corticospinal motor system may 'oversee' development of its downstream subcortical targets through activity, trophic-like interactions, and synaptic competition.

Corticospinal circuit plasticity in motor rehabilitation from spinal cord injury

Restoring corticospinal function after spinal cord injury is a significant challenge as the corticospinal tract elicits no substantive, spontaneous regeneration, and its interruption leaves a permanent deficit. The corticospinal circuit serves multiple motor and sensory functions within the mammalian nervous system as the direct link between isocortex and spinal cord. Maturation of the corticospinal circuit involves the refinement of projections within the spinal cord and a subsequent refinement of motor maps within the cortex. The plasticity of these cortical motor maps mirrors the acquisition of skilled motor learning, and both the maps and motor skills are disrupted following injury to the corticospinal tract. The motor cortex exhibits the capacity to incorporate changes in corticospinal projections induced by both spontaneous and therapeutic-mediated plasticity of corticospinal axons through appropriate rehabilitation. An understanding of the mechanisms of corticospinal plasticity in motor learning will undoubtedly help inform strategies to improve motor rehabilitation after spinal cord injury.