Glenohumeral Joint Kinematics following Clavicular Fracture and Repairs

The development and evaluation of an in-vitro shoulder simulator with active muscle simulation

The purpose of the present study was to develop a novel active in-vitro shoulder simulator to emulate all forms of planar and non-planar glenohumeral motions with active muscle simulation on cadaver specimens or shoulder models and to critically evaluate its performance. A physiologic shoulder simulator, driven using simulated muscle force, was developed to dynamically realize accurate kinematic control in all three rotational degrees of freedom (DOF) under physiological kinetic boundaries. The control algorithm of the simulator was implemented using three parallel running independent control loops, which regulate the forces of individual muscles in the respect DOF and work asynchronously in disparate sequences adapted to specific motions (abduction, flexion/extension and rotation). Three cadaveric specimens were used to evaluate the kinematic and kinetic performance of the simulator during simulated motions. High kinematic accuracy (maximum mean deviation ≤ 2.35° and RMSE 1.13°) and repeatability (maximum and average SD of ≤ 1.21° and 0.67°) were observed in all three rotational DOF investigated. The reliabilities of all individual muscle forces actuated in the simulator during planar and non-planar motions were generally excellent, with the 95% CIs of ICC estimates of > 0.90 for most instances (30/36). A novel shoulder simulator with active muscle simulation was developed and evaluated. Its capability to reproduce kinematics and kinetics in a physiological range for all DOF was systematically evaluated for multiple kinetic and kinematic outcome variables. The presented simulator is a powerful tool for investigating the biomechanics of physiological and pathological shoulder joints and to evaluate various surgical interventions. Acquisition of reliable data in joint kinetics and translational kinematics during active motions is critical to assess shoulder pathologies and appropriate treatments. We provide a unique muscle activated physiologic shoulder simulator, which allows the comprehensive acquisition of joint kinematic and kinetic data during repeated realistic planar and non-planar motions.

Effect of intraarticular pressure on glenohumeral kinematics during a simulated abduction motion: a cadaveric study

BACKGROUND

The current understanding of glenohumeral joint stability is defined by active restrictions and passive stabilizers including naturally-occurring negative intraarticular pressure. Cadaveric specimens have been used to evaluate the role of intraarticular pressure on joint stability, although, while the shoulder's negative intraarticular pressure is universally acknowledged, it has been inconsistently accounted for.

HYPOTHESIS

During continuous, passive humeral abduction, releasing the native intraarticular pressure increases joint translation, and restoring this pressure decreases joint translations.

STUDY DESIGN

Descriptive Laboratory Study.

METHODS

A validated shoulder testing system was used to passively abduct the humerus in the scapular plane and measure joint translations for seven (n = 7) cadaveric specimens. The pressure within the glenohumeral joint was measured via a 25-gauge needle during passive abduction of the arm, which was released and subsequently restored. During motion, the rotator cuff muscles were loaded using stepper motors in a force feedback loop and electromagnetic sensors were used to continuously measure the position of the humerus and scapula. Joint translation was defined according to the instant center of rotation of the glenohumeral head according to the recommendations by the International Society of Biomechanics.

RESULTS

Area under the translation versus abduction angle curve suggests that releasing the pressure within the capsule results in significantly less posterior translation of the glenohumeral head as compared to intact (85-90˚, p < 0.05). Posterior and superior translations were reduced after 70˚ of abduction when the pressure within the joint was restored.

CONCLUSION

With our testing system employing a smooth continuous passive motion, we were able to show that releasing intraarticular pressure does not have a major effect on the path of humeral head motion during glenohumeral abduction. However, both violating the capsule and restoring intraarticular pressure after releasing alter glenohumeral translations. Future studies should study the effect of simultaneous external rotation and abduction on the relationship between joint motion and IAP, especially in higher degrees of abduction.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

Thoroughly simulating the glenohumeral joint environment in the cadaveric setting may strengthen the conclusions that can be translated from this setting to the clinic.

Effect of rotator cuff muscle activation on glenohumeral kinematics: A cadaveric study

Healthy shoulder function requires the coordination of the rotator cuff muscles to maintain the humeral head's position in the glenoid. While glenohumeral stability has been studied in various settings, few studies have characterized the effect of dynamic rotator cuff muscle loading on glenohumeral translation during shoulder motion. We hypothesize that dynamic rotator cuff muscle activation decreases joint translation during continuous passive abduction of the humerus in a cadaveric model of scapular plane glenohumeral abduction. The effect of different rotator cuff muscle activity on glenohumeral translation was assessed using a validated shoulder testing system. The Dynamic Load profile is a novel approach, based on musculoskeletal modeling of human subject motion. Passive humeral elevation in the scapular plane was applied via the testing system arm, while the rotator cuff muscles were activated according to the specified force profiles using stepper motors and a proportional control feedback loop. Glenohumeral translation was defined according to the International Society of Biomechanics. The Dynamic load profile minimized superior translation of the humeral head relative to the conventional loading profiles. The total magnitude of translation was not significantly different (0.805) among the loading profiles suggesting that the compressive forces from the rotator cuff primarily alter the direction of humeral head translation, not the magnitude. Rotator cuff muscle loading is an important element of cadaveric shoulder studies that must be considered to accurately simulate glenohumeral motion. A rotator cuff muscle activity profile based on human subject muscle activity reduces superior glenohumeral translation when compared to previous RC loading profiles.