Evaluating Composite Sampling Methods of Bacillus Spores at Low Concentrations

Evaluation of sponge wipe surface sampling for collection of potential surrogates for non-spore-forming bioterrorism agents

AIM

Evaluate the efficacy of sponge wipe sampling at recovering potential bacterial surrogates for Category A and B non-spore-forming bacterial bioterrorism agents from hard, nonporous surfaces.

METHODS

A literature survey identified seven nonpathogenic bacteria as potential surrogates for selected Category A and B non-spore-forming bacterial agents. Small (2 × 4 cm) and large (35.6 × 35.6 cm) coupons made from either stainless steel, plastic, or glass, were inoculated and utilized to assess persistence and surface sampling efficiency, respectively. Three commercially available premoistened sponge wipes (3M™, Sani-Stick®, and Solar-Cult®) were evaluated.

RESULTS

Mean recoveries from persistence testing indicated that three microorganisms (Yersinia ruckeri, Escherichia coli, and Serratia marcescens) demonstrated sufficient persistence across all tested material types. Sampling of large inoculated (≥107 CFU per sample) coupons resulted in mean recoveries ranging from 6.6 to 3.4 Log10 CFU per sample. Mean recoveries for the Solar-Cult®, 3M™ sponge wipes, and Sani-Sticks® across all test organisms and all material types were ≥5.7, ≥3.7, and ≥3.4 Log10 CFU per sample, respectively. Mean recoveries for glass, stainless steel, and ABS plastic across all test organisms and all sponge types were ≥3.8, ≥3.7, and ≥3.4 Log10 CFU per sample, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Recovery results suggest that sponge wipe sampling can effectively be used to recover non-spore-forming bacterial cells from hard, nonporous surfaces such as stainless steel, ABS plastic, and glass.

Biological Validation of a Chemical Effluent Decontamination System

Introduction:

Failure of an existing effluent decontamination system (EDS) prompted the consideration of commercial off-the-shelf solutions for decontamination of containment laboratory waste. A bleach-based chemical EDS was purchased to serve as an interim solution.

Methods:

Studies were conducted in the laboratory to validate inactivation of Bacillus spores with bleach in complex matrices containing organic simulants including fetal bovine serum, humic acid, and animal room sanitation effluent.

Results:

These studies demonstrated effective decontamination of >106 spores at a free chlorine concentration of ≥5700 parts per million with a 2-hour contact time. Translation of these results to biological validation of the bleach-based chemical EDS required some modifications to the system and its operation.

Discussion:

The chemical EDS was validated for the treatment of biosafety levels 3 and 4 waste effluent using laboratory-prepared spore packets along with commercial biological indicators; however, several issues and lessons learned identified during the process of onboarding are also discussed, including bleach product source, method of validation, dechlorination, and treated waste disposal.

Alternative fast analysis method for cellulose sponge surface sampling wipes with low concentrations of Bacillus Spores

Environmental sampling is a critical component of the post decontamination verification process following a bioterrorism event. The current work was performed to produce a less labor-intensive method for processing cellulose sponge-wipes used for sampling areas potentially contaminated with low concentrations (i.e., post-decontamination) of Bacillus anthracis spores. An alternative fast-analysis processing method was compared to the processing protocol validated by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) for the Laboratory Response Network (LRN). Glazed tile coupons (1102 cm²) were inoculated with 50, 500, or 5000 spores of Bacillus thuringiensis subsp. kurstaki (Btk), then sampled with cellulose sponges. Sampling was limited to a 25- by 25-cm area and performed in the same manner as the CDC sampling method. Samples were then processed using either the alternative "Fast Analysis" method or the "CDC method". Three different analysts repeated the tests at each concentration utilizing each method. Mean recoveries, labor time, and potentially hazardous waste produced were compared for the two methods. The mean percent recoveries and standard errors for the samples processed using the "CDC method" were 39.9 ± 6.7, 43 ± 7.6, and 36.8 ± 10.1 for the 5000, 500, and 50 spore loading levels, respectively; compared to 54.2 ± 12.9, 64.2 ± 21.7, and 45.2 ± 8.6 for the "Fast Analysis" method. At each titer tested the "Fast Analysis" method resulted in a statistically significant higher percent recovery. Furthermore, analysts processed samples utilizing the "Fast Analysis" method in less than half the time and generated half as much potentially hazardous waste compared to the "CDC method".