Risk Factors for Complications after Reduction Mammoplasty: A Meta-Analysis

Assessment of risk factors for postoperative complications of breast reduction by superior or superomedial pedicle

BACKGROUND

Some risk factors for breast reduction complications are well known but for others the results are contradictory in scientific literature. The choice between superior pedicle and superomedial pedicle as a risk factor has been rarely studied. We aim to better identify the risk factors for breast reduction complications, including the choice between these two pedicles, in order to better prevent their occurrence.

METHODS

We performed a retrospective analysis of the medical records of patients who underwent a bilateral breast reduction from august 2020 to august 2023 in our center. Patient data were obtained and correlated with postoperative complications using statistical tests and a literature search was carried out to compare our results to the current evidence.

RESULTS

We included 216 patients. The complication rate was 24.07%. The most frequent complication was wound dehiscence (17.59%), followed by partial Nipple-Areola-Complex necrosis or peroperative suffering requiring conversion to Nipple-Areola-Complex free graft (5.56%). Increased Body Mass Index, superomedial pedicle and resection weight ≥650g were associated with an increased probability of complication occurrence (P=0.048, P=0.005 and P=0.044). The superomedial pedicle and the resection weight ≥650g were associated with an increased probability of wound dehiscence (P=0.005 and P=0.037). The difference between the preoperative and the postoperative Sternal-Notch-Nipple distance was associated with an increased probability of partial Nipple-Areola-Complex necrosis or Nipple-Areola-Complex free graft (P=0.014).

CONCLUSION

Correcting modifiable preoperative risk factors and mastering both techniques, enabling the surgeon to choose the one best suited to each patient's clinical situation, reduces the complication rate.

Superior Pedicle Breast Reduction: Multivariate Analysis of Complication Risk Factors and Building a Predictive Score in 1306 Patients

BACKGROUND

Breast reduction surgery for hypertrophy is one of the most commonly performed procedures in plastic surgery. This surgery exposes patients to complications that are well-documented in the literature. The objective of this study is to identify risk factors to establish an estimate of the risk of developing complications. The authors propose the first predictive score of postoperative complications, including continuous preoperative variables such as body mass index (BMI) and suprasternal notch-to-nipple distance (SSN:N).

METHODS

An analytic observational retrospective cohort study was conducted including 1306 patients who underwent superior pedicle reduction mammaplasty at the Rennes University Hospital (France) between January 1, 2011, and December 31, 2016. The primary endpoint was to study the association between known preoperative risk factors and occurrence of any complications using multivariable logistic regression to identify independent risk factors. A secondary endpoint was to establish a score to estimate a probability of occurrence of complications.

RESULTS

A total of 1306 patients were analyzed. Multivariable logistic regression showed three independent risk factors: active smoking [OR, 6.10 (95% CI: 4.23, 8.78); P < 0.0001], BMI [OR, 1.16 (95% CI: 1.11, 1.22); P < 0.0001], and SSN:N [OR, 1.14 (95% CI: 1.08, 1.21); P < 0.0001]. The Rennes Plastic Surgery Score estimating the occurrence of postoperative complications was determined, integrating regression coefficients of each risk factor.

CONCLUSIONS

Active smoking, BMI, and SSN:N distance are independent preoperative risk factors for the occurrence of breast reduction complications. The Rennes Plastic Surgery Score including the continuous values of BMI and SSN:N allows us to provide our patients with a reliable estimation of the risk of occurrence of these complications.

CLINICAL QUESTION/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Risk, III.

Does Prior Breast Irradiation Increase Complications of Subsequent Reduction Surgery in Breast Cancer Patients? A systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

BACKGROUND

Reduction mammoplasty and mastopexy are potentially complicated by prior breast irradiation as part of breast conserving therapy. Associated tissue changes with therapeutic irradiation have led to surgeons deciding the risks may outweigh potential benefit for those patients. A systematic review of the existing literature was performed to explore surgical outcomes of patients undergoing delayed bilateral reduction mammoplasty or mastopexy following unilateral breast irradiation as part of breast conserving therapy.

METHODS

Medline, PubMed and EMBASE were searched from 1990 to 2023 according to PRISMA guidelines. Studies were combined by the generic inverse variance method on the natural logarithms of rate ratios (RR) using a random effect model in Review manager 5.4.1.

RESULTS

Fifteen studies reported outcomes in 188 patients who underwent breast reduction (BR) following unilateral breast conserving surgery and radiotherapy. The median age at BR was 51.5 years (range 39-60), and median time since radiotherapy was 48 months (range 11.7-86). We compared outcomes for irradiated breast (IB) versus non-irradiated breast (NIB). Pooled results showed higher rate of major complications in the IB (RR 2.52, 95%CI 0.96-6.63, p=0.06), but not statistically significant. However, rate of minor complications was significantly higher in the IB (RR 3.97 95%CI 1.86-8.50, p<0.0004). Incidence of fat necrosis as a discrete complication was 2× higher in IB (RR 2.14 95%CI 0.85-5.35, p-value 0.10) compared to the NIB, but not significant.

CONCLUSION

We found breast reduction to be safe with acceptable risk of major complications. However, the overall complication rate remains higher in IB compared to NIB.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE III

This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266 .

Return to Work after Breast Reduction: A Comparative Study

(1) Background: Breast hypertrophy is a prevalent condition among women worldwide, which can affect different aspects of their quality of life. Uncertainty exists in the medical literature about recommendations for return to work after reduction mammaplasty procedures. The aim of this study was to assess the return to work after reduction mammaplasty for women with breast hypertrophy. (2) Methods: A retrospective cohort study composed of chart review of all reduction mammaplasties performed at a single institution due to breast hypertrophy was considered. Patients not in working life were excluded. Patients were divided into two groups based on the sick leave duration: normal versus prolonged. Prolonged sick leave time was defined as times greater than the 75th percentile for the respective sample data. Demographic and comorbidity data were secondary predictor variables. The primary outcome measure was the occurrence of prolonged sick leave. Secondary endpoints were specific wound healing complications and late complications. We further compare postoperative complications between patients who received a sick leave of 3 weeks versus the other patient cohort. (3) Results: From a total of 490 patients, 407 of them were employed at intake. Mean time to working return after reduction mammaplasty was 4.0 ± 0.9 weeks. Prolonged sick leave occurred in 77 patients and its mean duration was 5.5 ± 0.9 weeks. No differences in age, preoperative BMI, smoking, comorbidities, number of children or use of herbal supplements were detected. Significantly increased intraoperative blood loss occurred in the group who received prolonged sick leave (328.3 mL vs. 279.2 mL, p = 0.031). Postoperative complications were significantly higher in the group who experienced a prolonged sick leave (26.5% vs. 11.2%, p < 0.001), particularly infections and wound dehiscence incidences. No differences in late complications were detected (>30 days, 6.5% vs. 7.6%, p = 0.729). When comparing patients who received a 3 week sick leave with the rest of cohort, blood loss was significantly higher in the group who had a longer sick leave (230.9 mL vs. 303.7 mL, p < 0.001). (4) Conclusions: The occurrence of postoperative complications increased the patients’ return to work time. Comorbidities and preoperative parameters did not affect the length of sick leave. It appears reasonable to suggest a recovery period of approximately 3 weeks, subject to individual variations. An increased intraoperative blood loss might predict a prolonged sick leave.

Obesity and Complications in Mammoplasty: A Retrospective Review in an Obese Patient Population

With trends of obesity increasing, plastic surgeons are resecting larger weights from larger patients. Published literature has demonstrated the association between body mass index (BMI) and resection weight to postsurgical complications; however, these relationships are unclear in a population that is primarily overweight or obese. Our study examines these relationships to assist plastic surgeons in identifying high-risk patients and discussing preoperative measures to decrease the likelihood of surgical complications.

METHODS

We performed a retrospective electronic medical record review of a cohort of 182 bilateral reduction mammoplasty procedures performed at a single institution over a four-year period. Patient data were obtained and correlated with postoperative complications.

RESULTS

Within our identified patient cohort, 95% were classified as either overweight or obese. Incidence of complications was 51%, with wound dehiscence having the highest incidence of 36.26%. Using a multivariate regression, our analysis found statistical significance between surgical complications and both smoking status and BMI (P = 0.042 and P = 0.025, respectively). Smokers had an increased risk of complications with an odds ratio of 5.165. For every additional 1 kg/m2 increase in BMI, the odds for surgical complication increased by 1.079. In a subanalysis focusing on wound dehiscence, the use of postoperative drains was a protective factor (P = 0.0065).

CONCLUSIONS

Our study population, with a high average BMI and smoking status, demonstrated a statistically significant increase in postsurgical complications. These findings will help counsel obese patients preoperatively on their increased risk of complications.

Gender-affirming Mastectomy: Comparison of Periareolar and Double Incision Patterns

Background:

Gender-affirming mastectomy has become one of the most frequently performed procedures for transgender and nonbinary patients. Although there are a variety of potential surgical approaches available, the impact of technique on outcomes remains unclear. Here we present our experience performing periareolar and double incision mastectomies, with a focus on comparing patient demographics, preoperative risk factors, and surgical outcomes and complication rates between techniques.

Methods:

Retrospective review identified patients undergoing gender-affirming mastectomy by the senior author between 2017 and 2020. Patients were stratified according to surgical technique, with demographics and postoperative outcomes compared between groups.

Results:

In total, 490 patients underwent gender-affirming mastectomy during the study period. An estimated 96 patients underwent periareolar mastectomy, whereas 390 underwent double incision mastectomy. Demographics were similar between groups, and there were no differences in rates of hematoma (3.1% versus 5.6%, respectively; P = 0.90), seroma (33.3% versus 36.4%; P = 0.52), or revision procedures (14.6% versus 15.8% P = 0.84) based on technique.

Conclusions:

Our results demonstrate no difference in the rates of postoperative complications or revision procedures based on surgical technique. These results also suggest that with an experienced surgeon and proper patient selection, both techniques of gender-affirming mastectomy can be performed safely and with comparable outcomes.

Predictive Patient Characteristics and Surgical Variables That Influence Postoperative Complications following Bilateral Reduction Mammoplasty

Breast hypertrophy is known to be a source of both physical and psychosocial health deficits. Therefore, the ability to relieve these symptoms with surgical treatment is an important consideration for patients. The primary objective of this study was to assess the impact of patient body mass index (BMI) on postoperation complications. The secondary objective of this study was to assess patient demographics, surgical techniques, and patient comorbidities for their impact on specific postoperative complications.

Methods

A retrospective chart review of all patients who received bilateral breast reduction surgery in Nova Scotia over the past 10 years was performed. A total of 1022 patients met the inclusion criteria of the study. Logistic regression modeling was performed to identify demographic factors, surgical techniques, and patient comorbidities that impact the risk of developing specific postoperative complications.

Results

Our study population had a total complication incidence of 37.7%. BMI was not significantly different between patients who developed complications and those who did not. Logistic regression modeling showed a significant relationship that with each unit increase in BMI above the mean (25.9 kg/m2) the relative risk of patient-reported postoperative asymmetry increased by 6%.

Conclusions

The findings of this study suggest that BMI has several nonsignificant relationships to postoperative complications following bilateral breast reduction. These trends do not translate to significantly increased complaints of asymmetry, scarring' or revision surgeries. This study also provides valuable information on the timeline of postoperative complications and when they can commonly be identified.

Twenty Years of Breast Reduction Surgery at a Veterans Affairs Medical Center

Background

Breast reduction surgery has a high patient satisfaction rate for the treatment of symptomatic macromastia. However, complications from the surgery can significantly disrupt a woman's life due to time in the hospital, clinic appointments, wound care, time off work, and poor aesthetic outcome. Beginning July 2007, the Malcom Randall Veterans Affairs Medical Center (MRVAMC) Plastic Surgery Service in Gainesville, Florida, started using a preoperative screening protocol to help patients achieve a healthier and more favorable risk profile.

Methods

A retrospective chart review was conducted on all breast reduction surgeries performed at the MRVAMC from July 1, 2000 to June 30, 2020. Medical records were queried for all primary breast reduction surgeries performed for symptomatic macromastia. Potentially modifiable or predictable risk factors for wound complications were recorded: nicotine status, body mass index (BMI), diabetes mellitus (DM) status, skin incision pattern, and pedicle location. Records were reviewed for 3 months after surgery for local wound complications that included: hematoma, infection, wound breakdown, skin and nipple necrosis. Major complications required an unplanned hospital admission or operation.

Results

Over the 20-year period, 115 bilateral breast reduction surgeries were performed. There were 48 wound complications (41.7%) and 8 major complications (7%). Most complications were identified in the first 7 years of the study. BMI > 32 (P = .03) and active nicotine use (P = .004) were found to be statistically significant risk factors for wound complications. DM status (P = .22), skin incision pattern (P = .25), and pedicle location (P = .13), were not predictors of wound complications.

Conclusions

Breast reduction surgery has a high wound complication rate, which can be predicted and improved upon so that patients can receive their indicated surgery with minimal inconvenience and downtime. This review confirms that preoperative weight loss and nicotine cessation were the appropriate focus of the MRVAMC Plastic Surgery service's efforts to achieve a safer surgical experience.

Age and Body Mass Index Affect Patient Satisfaction Following Reduction Mammoplasty: A Multicenter Study Using BREAST-Q

BACKGROUND

Reduction mammoplasty effectively improves quality of life for women with macromastia. However, little is known whether surgical- or patient-related factors affect satisfaction.

OBJECTIVE

The authors sought to investigate factors associated with altered patient satisfaction following reduction mammoplasty.

METHODS

A cross-section study was performed by sending the BREAST-Q Reduction module to all patients who had undergone reduction mammoplasty between January 2009 and December 2018 at 2 tertiary Danish hospitals. Demographics and pre-, peri-, and postoperative details were gathered from electronic medical records.

RESULTS

A total of 393 patients returned the questionnaire and were eligible for the study. Increasing age at the time of surgery was associated with higher satisfaction with breasts nipples, headache, psychosocial well-being, and outcome. Increased body mass index at the time of surgery negatively affected satisfaction with breasts and psychosocial well-being. Increase in body mass index after surgery was further associated with lower satisfaction with breasts, nipples, sexual well-being, and more pain in the breast area. Postoperative scar revision and wound infection was more common following inferior pedicle technique than superomedial technique and negatively affected satisfaction with outcome and pain in the breast area.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients should be motivated to optimize their weight prior to reduction mammoplasty to achieve optimal satisfaction. Age was associated with improved patient satisfaction, which should considered when operating on younger patients. Postoperative complications affect patient satisfaction, and the superomedial technique seems to be a better choice than the inferior pedicle technique in medium-large breasts.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 4

Reduction mammoplasty and mastopexy in the previously irradiated breast - a systematic review and meta-analysis

Breast cancer is the most common cancer diagnosed in women, and early stages are treated with lumpectomy and irradiation. Irradiation, however, leads to reduced vascularization and fibrosis, which may influence the cosmetic outcome unfavourably and increase complications after subsequent surgery on irradiated breasts. Patients with significant asymmetry after treatment may desire corrective reduction mammoplasty or mastopexy, but this may be associated with increased complication rates. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to investigate postoperative complication rates after bilateral reduction mammoplasty or mastopexy in women who had undergone unilateral lumpectomy and irradiation. PubMed, Medline, EMBASE and Cochrane databases were searched for eligible studies. After screening titles and abstracts, 14 full text studies were reviewed, and 7 of these were included in the analysis. The meta-analysis showed a significantly higher complication rate in the irradiated breast compared to the non-irradiated breast, rate ratio 4.82 (95% CI: 1.58, 14.70), p = 0.006. The complication rate was 54% in the irradiated breast (58/107) compared to 8% (9/107) in the non-irradiated breast (p = 0.034). This study suggests that reduction mammoplasty or mastopexy in the previously irradiated breast is associated with a significantly increased risk of complications. Careful patient selection and information are paramount in the treatment of this patient group.

Natural course of fat necrosis after breast reconstruction: a 10-year follow-up study

Background

Although fat necrosis is a minor postoperative complication after breast reconstruction, occasionally it mimics to tumor recurrence in patients with breast cancer. Therefore, the surgeon should distinguish between benign fat necrosis and true local recurrence. The authors evaluated the clinical characteristics of fat necrosis after breast reconstruction and investigated the natural course of fat necrosis.

Methods

Between 2007 and 2013, a total of 362 patients underwent breast reconstruction after partial or total mastectomy for breast cancer in Kyungpook National University Hospital. Clinicopathologic characteristics and the occurrence of fat necrosis were assessed during surveillance for 10 years of mean follow-up period.

Results

There were 42 cases (11.6%) of fat necrosis after breast reconstruction with partial or total mastectomy which were confirmed by needle or excision biopsy. The fat necrosis was resolved after a mean period of 45.9 months (SD, ± 42.1) and 26 cases (61.9%) of fat necrosis were almost completely resolved (less than 5 mm) during 10-year follow-up period.

Conclusion

Based on the natural course of fat necrosis, the fat necrosis after breast reconstruction can be only monitored, if pathologic confirmation was done. More than half of the cases will be resolved within 2–3 years.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12885-021-07881-x.

Breast Reduction in Adults: Identifying Risk Factors for Overall 30-Day Postoperative Complications

BACKGROUND

Breast reduction is a commonly performed procedure. Understanding the postoperative complication profile is important for preoperative planning and patient education.

OBJECTIVES

The authors sought to assess complication rates following breast reduction in females and identify potential risk factors.

METHODS

We assessed the records of the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program participant use files that include patients who underwent breast reduction for macromastia between 2005 and 2016. Relevant patient and postoperative data were extracted, and factors affecting complications were analyzed utilizing the logistic regression model.

RESULTS

We identified 20,001 women aged a mean 43.9 years who underwent breast reduction. The number of patients who developed ≥1 complication was 1009 (4.3%). Our adjusted analysis revealed that outpatient setting (odds ratio [OR] = 0.600) and performance of the surgery by the attending surgeon alone (OR = 0.678) were associated with lower odds, whereas higher body mass index (OR = 1.046) and smoking (OR = 1.518) were associated with higher odds for complications following breast reduction. Outpatient setting (OR = 0.317) was also associated with lower odds whereas smoking (OR = 1.613) and American Society of Anesthesiologists class were associated with higher odds of returning to the operative room. These findings were consistent in our subgroup analysis for wound-related complications.

CONCLUSIONS

Our study shows that patient characteristics such as smoking and body mass index may increase complication rates after breast reduction. Clinical factors such as inpatient setting may also increase risk of complications following breast reduction. It is critical to understand the effect of these factors to better predict postoperative outcomes and ensure thorough patient education.

Reliability and versatility of the Wise pattern, medial pedicle for breast reduction in South Africa

Background

Breast hypertrophy is a condition of abnormal enlargement of the breast which may continue until each breast weighs more than 1.5 kg (macromastia) or even more than 2 kg (gigantomastia). Supporting such heavy weights leads to cervical and upper thoracic back pain, costochondritis, and fungal infections in the mammary folds, making reduction mammoplasty essential. However, there is a lack of consensus among plastic surgeons as to the best technique. This study reports the results of reduction mammoplasties in South African women using the Wise pattern, minimally undermined with a medial pedicle.

Methods

A retrospective record review of the reduction mammoplasties was conducted over a 1-year period. Patient records were assessed for early complications related to vascular reliability.

Results

One hundred and fourteen Wise pattern minimally undermined, medial pedicle techniques were performed on 57 consecutive patients in the 1-year period at the NetCare Rand Clinic in Berea, Johannesburg, South Africa (EN). The patients' sternal notch to nipple distances ranged from 28 to 52 cm. The volume of breast reduction ranged from 345 g to 3300 g per breast. The overall complication rate was 9.7%, consisting of fat necrosis (3.5%), infection (1.7%), dehiscence (3.5%), and nipple epidermolysis (0.9%).

Conclusion

The minimally undermined Wise pattern medial pedicle breast reduction technique proved to be a reliable technique for breast reduction in the South African population. Safety in pedicle breast reduction with sternal notch to nipple distances of up to 50 cm, as well as reliability and versatility in a wide range of breast sizes, was demonstrated.

Bilateral reduction mammaplasty with pulsed electron avalanche knife PlasmaBlade™ and conventional electrosurgical surgery: A retrospective, randomised controlled clinical trial

Wound-healing disorders are common complications in bilateral reduction mammaplasty. Traditional electrosurgical devices generate large amounts of thermal energy, often causing extensive thermal-related collateral tissue damage. This study aimed to retrospectively analyse the operative performance of a novel low-thermal plasma dissection device (pulsed electron avalanche knife-PEAK PlasmaBlade™) compared with traditional electrosurgery. Twenty patients with breast hypertrophy were randomly treated with PEAK PlasmaBlade™ on one breast and conventional electrosurgery on the other. Primary outcome measures were resection weight, drain duration, total drainage volume, and drain output on the first postoperative day. Breasts treated with PEAK PlasmaBlade™ had significantly higher resection weights (728.0 ± 460.1 g vs 661.6 ± 463.4 g; P = .038), significantly lower drain output on the first postoperative day (15.9 ± 15.2 mL vs 27.6 ± 23.5 mL; P = .023), and significantly lower drain durations (2.8 ± 1.0 days vs 3.3 ± 1.0 days; P = .030). Mean total drainage volume was lower where breast reduction was performed with PEAK PlasmaBlade™, but this difference was not significant. No major complications occurred, but wound-healing disorders were documented in almost one-third of the patients (35.0%, n = 7). The PEAK PlasmaBlade™ seems to be superior to conventional electrosurgery for bilateral reduction mammaplasty in terms of tissue damage and wound healing.

The Impact of Metabolic Syndrome on Patients Undergoing Breast Reduction Surgery

Metabolic syndrome affects 35% of individuals in the USA and has been correlated with increased complications following certain surgical procedures. There has been an increase of 11% in breast reduction procedures from 2016 to 2017 making it the seventh most common reconstructive procedure in the USA. Previous studies have identified an increase in demand for breast reduction among obese patients with BMI ≥ 30 but have not defined the role of metabolic syndrome in surgical outcomes. The authors aim to investigate the impact of metabolic syndrome on 30-day postoperative morbidity and mortality in patients who underwent reduction mammoplasty.

Surgical Site Infections in Aesthetic Surgery

Surgical site infections represent one of the most common postoperative complications in patients undergoing aesthetic surgery. As with other postoperative complications, the incidence of these infections may be influenced by many factors and varies depending on the specific operation performed. Understanding the risk factors for infection development is critical because careful patient selection and appropriate perioperative counseling will set the right expectations and can ultimately improve patient outcomes and satisfaction. Various perioperative prevention measures may also be employed to minimize the incidence of these infections. Once the infection occurs, prompt diagnosis will allow management of the infection and any associated complications in a timely manner to ensure patient safety, optimize the postoperative course, and avoid long-term sequelae.

BMI and specimen weight: impact on personalized risk profiling for optimized informed consent in breast reduction surgery?

We aimed to evaluate the interaction between individual risk factors and institutional complication rates after reduction mammaplasties to develop a chart for a personalized written patient informed consent. We retrospectively reviewed charts of 804 patients who underwent bilateral breast reduction between 2005 and 2015. The Clavien-Dindo classification was used to classify postoperative complications. Relevant predictors were found by applying a stepwise variable selection procedure. Multilevel predictors were assessed through chi-square tests on the respective deviance reductions. 486 patients were included. The most common complications were wound healing problems (n = 270/56%), foreign body reactions (n = 58/12%), wound infections (n = 45/9, 3%) and fat tissue necrosis (n = 41/8%). The risk factors for the personalized patient chart for the most common complications influencing the preoperative informed consent were: smoking, operative technique, resection weight for wound healing problems; body mass index and allergies for wound infections; and patients’ age, resection weight for fat tissue necrosis. The resultant chart of institutionally encountered most common complications based on individual risk factors is a graphical template for obtaining patient informed consent in the future. Whether this approach influences patient information retainment, incidence of filed lawsuits or behavioral change needs to be prospectively tested in future studies.

Outcomes analysis of breast reduction in Brazilian women using the BREAST-Q® questionnaire: a cross-sectional controlled study

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to analyse patient-reported outcomes of reduction mammoplasty among Brazilian women.

METHODS

A total of 100 women were enrolled in this cross-sectional controlled study, 50 with breast hypertrophy (Hypertrophy Group) and 50 who had undergone breast reduction at least six and up to 12 months before (Mammoplasty Group). The Brazilian version of the BREAST-Q® was applied to assess patient-reported outcomes. The module reduction/mastopexy was used, and the preoperative and postoperative versions were applied to the hypertrophy and mammoplasty groups, respectively.

RESULTS

The mammoplasty group presented higher scores for the subscales satisfaction with breasts, psychosocial well-being, sexual well-being and physical well-being (p=0.0001 for all of these subscales).

CONCLUSION

These results suggest that patients submitted to reduction mammoplasty are satisfied with the outcomes and present better quality of life scores compared with women with breast hypertrophy.