The Association between GABA-Modulators and Clostridium difficile Infection - A Matched Retrospective Case-Control Study

Risk Factors Associated with Severe Clostridioides difficile Infection in Patients with Cancer

INTRODUCTION

Antibiotic use is a risk factor for Clostridioides difficile infection (CDI). Few studies have correlated use of prior antibiotic classes with CDI, microbiome composition, and disease severity in patients with cancer. We hypothesized that previous antibiotic exposure and fecal microbiome composition at time of presentation are risk factors for severe CDI in patients with cancer.

METHODS

This non-interventional, prospective, cohort study examined 200 patients with cancer who had their first episode or first recurrence of CDI. C. difficile was identified using nucleic acid amplification testing. Univariate analysis was used to determine significant risk factors for severe CDI. Fecal microbiome composition was determined by sequencing the V3/V4 region of 16 s rDNA encoding gene. Differential abundance analyses were used to single out significant microbial features which differed across severity levels.

RESULTS

On univariate analysis, factors associated with severe CDI included the presence of toxin A/B in stools (odds ratio [OR] 2.14 [1.05-4.36] p = 0.04 and prior 90-day metronidazole use (OR 2.66 [1.09-6.50] p = 0.03). Although alpha and beta diversity was similar between disease severity groups and toxin A/B in stools, increased abundance of Bacteroides uniformis, Ruminococcaceae, and Citrobacter koseri were associated with protection from severe CDI (p < 0.05) and depletion of anaerobes was higher in patients with prior metronidazole exposure.

CONCLUSION

Use of metronidazole for non-CDI indications within 90 days prior to diagnosis and presence of toxin A/B in stools were associated with severe CDI. Findings provide valuable insights into risk factors for severe CDI in an underserved population with cancer that warrants further exploration.

Hypnotics and infections: disproportionality analysis of the U.S. Food & Drug Administration adverse event reporting system database

STUDY OBJECTIVES

There is no consensus information on infections associated with nonbenzodiazepines. Knowledge about infections related to newly marketed hypnotics (orexin receptor antagonists and melatonin receptor agonists) is scarce. The study aimed to detect infection signals for nonbenzodiazepines, orexin receptor antagonists, and melatonin receptor agonists by analyzing data from the U.S. Food & Drug Administration adverse event reporting system.

METHODS

A disproportionality analysis was performed to quantitatively detect infection signals for hypnotics by calculating the reporting odds ratio and the 95% confidence interval. Data registered in the U.S. Food & Drug Administration adverse event reporting system from 2010-2020 were retrieved.

RESULTS

A total of 3,092 patients with infection were extracted for the 3 classes of hypnotic drugs. Nonbenzodiazepines were associated with a higher disproportionality of infections (reporting odds ratio: 1.10; 95% confidence interval, 1.06-1.14). The association of infections was not present for melatonin receptor agonists (reporting odds ratio: 0.86; 95% confidence interval, 0.74-1.00) and orexin receptor antagonists (reporting odds ratio: 0.19; 95% confidence interval, 0.15-0.25). Significant reporting associations were identified for nonbenzodiazepines concerning the categories of bone and joint infections, dental and oral soft tissue infections, upper respiratory tract infections, and urinary tract infections.

CONCLUSIONS

Nonbenzodiazepines had a positive signal for infections, while orexin receptor antagonists and melatonin receptor agonists had a negative signal. More research needs to be conducted to confirm this relationship.

CITATION

Meng L, Huang J, He Q, et al. Hypnotics and infections: disproportionality analysis of the U.S. Food & Drug Administration adverse event reporting system database. J Clin Sleep Med. 2022;18(9):2229-2235.

Habitat selection by a threatened desert amphibian

Habitat degradation and fragmentation are major drivers of amphibian declines. The loss of environmental features that allow for movement between water sources may be particularly detrimental for amphibians in arid environments. Climate changes will increase the importance of microhabitats to amphibians. Enhancing areas to facilitate movement may be a necessary conservation strategy for many animal species that depend on wetlands, including federally threatened Chiricahua leopard frogs (Lithobates chiricahuensis). Habitat preferences of this frog species are not well understood. We sought to better understand fine-scale habitat selection, to inform conservation of Chiricahua leopard frogs. We conducted our study on the Ladder Ranch, a privately owned working bison ranch in New Mexico, USA that supports a large proportion of the remaining Chiricahua leopard frogs in the state. We attached radio transmitters to 44 frogs during summer 2014. We located each frog daily for up to 8 weeks (median = 30 days). We assessed fine-scale habitat selection by comparing characteristics at each frog location and a random location 5 m away using conditional logistic regression. Frogs preferred features that likely reduce desiccation, even after accounting for the presence of water. Frogs selected areas with more low-lying cover, especially aquatic vegetation and woody debris, a tree overstory, and a mud substrate. We recommend managing potential movement corridors for Chiricahua leopard frogs by ensuring the presence of muddy creek bottoms, woody debris, riparian overstory, low-lying ground cover, and pools. Microclimates created by these features seem especially valuable given warming temperatures and modified precipitation regimes, resulting in decreased surface water, soil moisture, and vegetation cover. Retaining or creating preferred habitat features and microclimates in areas between water sources may increase connectivity among isolated populations of Chiricahua leopard frogs and could improve persistence and recovery of other water-obligate species in arid landscapes.

GABAergic but not Antidepressant Medications Increase Risk for Clostridioides difficile Infection in a National Cohort of Veterans

Background

Clostridioides difficile infection (CDI) is primarily mediated by alterations in the host gut ecosystem. While antibiotic use is the primary risk factor for CDI, other medications that modulate the gut ecosystem, particularly those targeting the gut-brain axis, could impact CDI risk. This study aimed to investigate the association between recent antidepressant and gamma-aminobutyric acid (GABA)-ergic medication use with CDI risk in a national cohort of United States veterans.

Methods

This was a retrospective case-control study of patients seen in Veterans Health Administration facilities from October 2002 to September 2014. CDI and non-CDI control patients were propensity score matched 1:1 using a maximum caliper of 0.0001. Antidepressant and GABAergic medication use 90 days before cohort inclusion were analyzed for CDI association using bivariable and multivariable logistic regression models.

Results

A total of 85 831 patients were included, and 9287 CDI and 9287 control patients were propensity score matched. Antidepressant use overall was not significantly associated with CDI risk (odds ratio [OR], 1.05; 95% CI, 0.98-1.12), although GABAergic medication use was associated with increased risk (OR, 1.81; 95% CI, 1.70-1.92). In multivariable models of individual medications/classes, benzodiazepines had the strongest CDI association (OR, 1.91; 95% CI, 1.77-2.07). SSRIs (OR, 0.88; 95% CI, 0.81-0.95) and bupropion (OR, 0.67; 95% CI, 0.57-0.78) were negatively associated with CDI.

Conclusions

In this national study of veterans, GABAergic medication use was a positive predictor of CDI risk, though antidepressant use was not. Further research is needed to understand biological mechanisms, and confirmatory studies are needed to validate these findings.