Critical Features of Fragment Libraries for Protein Structure Prediction

Ab Initio Modelling of the Structure of ToxA-like and MAX Fungal Effector Proteins

Pathogenic fungal diseases in crops are mediated by the release of effector proteins that facilitate infection. Characterising the structure of these fungal effectors is vital to understanding their virulence mechanisms and interactions with their hosts, which is crucial in the breeding of plant cultivars for disease resistance. Several effectors have been identified and validated experimentally; however, their lack of sequence conservation often impedes the identification and prediction of their structure using sequence similarity approaches. Structural similarity has, nonetheless, been observed within fungal effector protein families, creating interest in validating the use of computational methods to predict their tertiary structure from their sequence. We used Rosetta ab initio modelling to predict the structures of members of the ToxA-like and MAX effector families for which experimental structures are known to validate this method. An optimised approach was then used to predict the structures of phenotypically validated effectors lacking known structures. Rosetta was found to successfully predict the structure of fungal effectors in the ToxA-like and MAX families, as well as phenotypically validated but structurally unconfirmed effector sequences. Interestingly, potential new effector structural families were identified on the basis of comparisons with structural homologues and the identification of associated protein domains.

Assigning secondary structure in proteins using AI

Knowledge about protein structure assignment enriches the structural and functional understanding of proteins. Accurate and reliable structure assignment data is crucial for secondary structure prediction systems. Since the 1980s, various methods based on hydrogen bond analysis and atomic coordinate geometry, followed by machine learning, have been employed in protein structure assignment. However, the assignment process becomes challenging when missing atoms are present in the protein files. Our method proposed a multi-class classifier program named DLFSA for assigning protein secondary structure elements (SSE) using convolutional neural networks (CNNs). A fast and efficient GPU-based parallel procedure extracts fragments from protein files. The model implemented in this work is trained with a subset of the protein fragments and achieves 88.1% and 82.5% train and test accuracy, respectively. The model uses only C_α coordinates for secondary structure assignments. The model has been successfully tested on a few full-length proteins also. Results from the fragment-based studies demonstrate the feasibility of applying deep learning solutions for structure assignment problems.

Protein Structure Prediction: Conventional and Deep Learning Perspectives

Protein structure prediction is a way to bridge the sequence-structure gap, one of the main challenges in computational biology and chemistry. Predicting any protein's accurate structure is of paramount importance for the scientific community, as these structures govern their function. Moreover, this is one of the complicated optimization problems that computational biologists have ever faced. Experimental protein structure determination methods include X-ray crystallography, Nuclear Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy and Electron Microscopy. All of these are tedious and time-consuming procedures that require expertise. To make the process less cumbersome, scientists use predictive tools as part of computational methods, using data consolidated in the protein repositories. In recent years, machine learning approaches have raised the interest of the structure prediction community. Most of the machine learning approaches for protein structure prediction are centred on co-evolution based methods. The accuracy of these approaches depends on the number of homologous protein sequences available in the databases. The prediction problem becomes challenging for many proteins, especially those without enough sequence homologs. Deep learning methods allow for the extraction of intricate features from protein sequence data without making any intuitions. Accurately predicted protein structures are employed for drug discovery, antibody designs, understanding protein-protein interactions, and interactions with other molecules. This article provides a review of conventional and deep learning approaches in protein structure prediction. We conclude this review by outlining a few publicly available datasets and deep learning architectures currently employed for protein structure prediction tasks.

Enhancing fragment-based protein structure prediction by customising fragment cardinality according to local secondary structure

BACKGROUND

Whenever suitable template structures are not available, usage of fragment-based protein structure prediction becomes the only practical alternative as pure ab initio techniques require massive computational resources even for very small proteins. However, inaccuracy of their energy functions and their stochastic nature imposes generation of a large number of decoys to explore adequately the solution space, limiting their usage to small proteins. Taking advantage of the uneven complexity of the sequence-structure relationship of short fragments, we adjusted the fragment insertion process by customising the number of available fragment templates according to the expected complexity of the predicted local secondary structure. Whereas the number of fragments is kept to its default value for coil regions, important and dramatic reductions are proposed for beta sheet and alpha helical regions, respectively.

RESULTS

The evaluation of our fragment selection approach was conducted using an enhanced version of the popular Rosetta fragment-based protein structure prediction tool. It was modified so that the number of fragment candidates used in Rosetta could be adjusted based on the local secondary structure. Compared to Rosetta's standard predictions, our strategy delivered improved first models, + 24% and + 6% in terms of GDT, when using 2000 and 20,000 decoys, respectively, while reducing significantly the number of fragment candidates. Furthermore, our enhanced version of Rosetta is able to deliver with 2000 decoys a performance equivalent to that produced by standard Rosetta while using 20,000 decoys. We hypothesise that, as the fragment insertion process focuses on the most challenging regions, such as coils, fewer decoys are needed to explore satisfactorily conformation spaces.

CONCLUSIONS

Taking advantage of the high accuracy of sequence-based secondary structure predictions, we showed the value of that information to customise the number of candidates used during the fragment insertion process of fragment-based protein structure prediction. Experimentations conducted using standard Rosetta showed that, when using the recommended number of decoys, i.e. 20,000, our strategy produces better results. Alternatively, similar results can be achieved using only 2000 decoys. Consequently, we recommend the adoption of this strategy to either improve significantly model quality or reduce processing times by a factor 10.

In silico Strategies to Support Fragment-to-Lead Optimization in Drug Discovery

Fragment-based drug (or lead) discovery (FBDD or FBLD) has developed in the last two decades to become a successful key technology in the pharmaceutical industry for early stage drug discovery and development. The FBDD strategy consists of screening low molecular weight compounds against macromolecular targets (usually proteins) of clinical relevance. These small molecular fragments can bind at one or more sites on the target and act as starting points for the development of lead compounds. In developing the fragments attractive features that can translate into compounds with favorable physical, pharmacokinetics and toxicity (ADMET-absorption, distribution, metabolism, excretion, and toxicity) properties can be integrated. Structure-enabled fragment screening campaigns use a combination of screening by a range of biophysical techniques, such as differential scanning fluorimetry, surface plasmon resonance, and thermophoresis, followed by structural characterization of fragment binding using NMR or X-ray crystallography. Structural characterization is also used in subsequent analysis for growing fragments of selected screening hits. The latest iteration of the FBDD workflow employs a high-throughput methodology of massively parallel screening by X-ray crystallography of individually soaked fragments. In this review we will outline the FBDD strategies and explore a variety of in silico approaches to support the follow-up fragment-to-lead optimization of either: growing, linking, and merging. These fragment expansion strategies include hot spot analysis, druggability prediction, SAR (structure-activity relationships) by catalog methods, application of machine learning/deep learning models for virtual screening and several de novo design methods for proposing synthesizable new compounds. Finally, we will highlight recent case studies in fragment-based drug discovery where in silico methods have successfully contributed to the development of lead compounds.

Computational reconstruction of atomistic protein structures from coarse-grained models

Three-dimensional protein structures, whether determined experimentally or theoretically, are often too low resolution. In this mini-review, we outline the computational methods for protein structure reconstruction from incomplete coarse-grained to all atomistic models. Typical reconstruction schemes can be divided into four major steps. Usually, the first step is reconstruction of the protein backbone chain starting from the C-alpha trace. This is followed by side-chains rebuilding based on protein backbone geometry. Subsequently, hydrogen atoms can be reconstructed. Finally, the resulting all-atom models may require structure optimization. Many methods are available to perform each of these tasks. We discuss the available tools and their potential applications in integrative modeling pipelines that can transfer coarse-grained information from computational predictions, or experiment, to all atomistic structures.

Combining co-evolution and secondary structure prediction to improve fragment library generation

Motivation

Recent advances in co-evolution techniques have made possible the accurate prediction of protein structures in the absence of a template. Here, we provide a general approach that further utilizes co-evolution constraints to generate better fragment libraries for fragment-based protein structure prediction.

Results

We have compared five different fragment library generation programmes on three different datasets encompassing over 400 unique protein folds. We show that considering the secondary structure of the fragments when assembling these libraries provides a critical way to assess their usefulness to structure prediction. We then use co-evolution constraints to improve the fragment libraries by enriching them with fragments that satisfy constraints and discarding those that do not. These improved libraries have better precision and lead to consistently better modelling results.

Availability and implementation

Data is available for download from: http://opig.stats.ox.ac.uk/resources. Flib-Coevo is available for download from: https://github.com/sauloho/Flib-Coevo.

Supplementary information

Supplementary data are available at Bioinformatics online.

Supersecondary Structures and Fragment Libraries

The use of smotifs and fragment libraries has proven useful to both simplify and increase the quality of protein models. Here, we present Profrager, a tool that automatically generates putative structural fragments to reproduce local motifs of proteins given a target sequence. Profrager is highly customizable, allowing the user to select the number of fragments per library, the ranking method is able to generate fragments of all sizes, and it was recently modified to include the possibility of output exclusively smotifs.

Improved fragment-based protein structure prediction by redesign of search heuristics

Difficulty in sampling large and complex conformational spaces remains a key limitation in fragment-based de novo prediction of protein structure. Our previous work has shown that even for small-to-medium-sized proteins, some current methods inadequately sample alternative structures. We have developed two new conformational sampling techniques, one employing a bilevel optimisation framework and the other employing iterated local search. We combine strategies of forced structural perturbation (where some fragment insertions are accepted regardless of their impact on scores) and greedy local optimisation, allowing greater exploration of the available conformational space. Comparisons against the Rosetta Abinitio method indicate that our protocols more frequently generate native-like predictions for many targets, even following the low-resolution phase, using a given set of fragment libraries. By contrasting results across two different fragment sets, we show that our methods are able to better take advantage of high-quality fragments. These improvements can also translate into more reliable identification of near-native structures in a simple clustering-based model selection procedure. We show that when fragment libraries are sufficiently well-constructed, improved breadth of exploration within runs improves prediction accuracy. Our results also suggest that in benchmarking scenarios, a total exclusion of fragments drawn from homologous templates can make performance differences between methods appear less pronounced.