Inhibition of peritoneal dissemination of colon cancer by hyperthermic CO2 insufflation: A novel approach to prevent intraperitoneal tumor spread

Disparities of tumour markers in intraperitoneal drainage fluid between laparoscopic and open radical gastrectomy for gastric cancer

Introduction

Despite the remarkable progress in minimally invasive surgery, the potential association between laparoscopic gastrectomy and the risk of peritoneal metastasis remains uncertain.

Aim

To investigate variations in tumour markers in intraperitoneal drainage fluid between laparoscopic radical gastrectomy and open radical gastrectomy for gastric cancer.

Material and methods

A total of 106 patients diagnosed with gastric cancer between July 2018 and November 2020 were included in this study, 45 of whom underwent laparoscopic radical gastrectomy (laparoscopic group) and 61 underwent open radical gastrectomy (open group). Variations in the levels of carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA), cancer antigen 125 (CA125), cancer antigen 199 (CA199), and α-fetoprotein (AFP) in the intraperitoneal drainage fluid were compared and analysed on postoperative days (PODs) 1, 2, 3, and 5 between the two groups. Additionally, the postoperative 3-year survival rates between the two groups were compared and analysed.

Results

No significant differences in CEA, CA199, and AFP levels in the intraperitoneal drainage fluid were observed between the two groups on postoperative days (PODs) 1, 2, 3, and 5 (p > 0.05). However, the level of CA125 in the intraperitoneal drainage fluid of the laparoscopic group was notably higher than that of the open group on POD 2 (p < 0.05); however, there were no significant differences between the two groups on PODs 1, 3, and 5 (p > 0.05). There was no significant difference in the 3-year postoperative survival rates between the two groups.

Conclusions

There were no significant differences in CEA, CA125, CA199, and AFP levels in the intraperitoneal drainage fluid between laparoscopic radical gastrectomy and open radical gastrectomy for gastric cancer, confirming from another perspective that laparoscopic radical gastrectomy does not increase the risk of intraperitoneal metastasis.

Effect of Surgical Humidification on Inflammation and Peritoneal Trauma in Colorectal Cancer Surgery: A Randomized Controlled Trial

BACKGROUND

Pre-clinical studies indicate that dry-cold-carbon-dioxide (DC-CO2) insufflation leads to more peritoneal damage, inflammation and hypothermia compared with humidified-warm-CO₂ (HW-CO2). Peritoneum and core temperature in patients undergoing colorectal cancer (CRC) surgery were compared.

METHODS

Sixty-six patients were randomized into laparoscopic groups; those insufflated with DC-CO2 or HW-CO2. A separate group of nineteen patients undergoing laparotomy were randomised to conventional surgery or with the insertion of a device delivering HW-CO2. Temperatures were monitored and peritoneal biopsies and bloods were taken at the start of surgery, at 1 and 3 h. Further bloods were taken depending upon hospital length-of-stay (LOS). Peritoneal samples were subjected to scanning electron microscopy to evaluate mesothelial damage.

RESULTS

Laparoscopic cases experienced a temperature drop despite Bair-Hugger^TM use. HW-CO2 restored normothermia (≥ 36.5 °C) by 3 h, DC-CO2 did not. LOS was shorter for colon compared with rectal cancer cases and if insufflated with HW-CO2 compared with DC-CO2; 5.0 vs 7.2 days, colon and 11.6 vs 15.4 days rectum, respectively. Unexpectedly, one third of patients had pre-existing damage. Damage increased at 1 and 3 h to a greater extent in the DC-CO2 compared with the HW-CO2 laparoscopic cohort. C-reactive protein levels were higher in open than laparoscopic cases and lower in both matched HW-CO2 groups.

CONCLUSIONS

This prospective RCT is in accord with animal studies while highlighting pre-existing damage in some patients. Peritoneal mesothelium protection, reduced inflammation and restoration of core-body temperature data suggest benefit with the use of HW-CO2 in patients undergoing CRC surgery.

The Pathogenesis and Prevention of Port-Site Metastasis in Gynecologic Oncology

Port-site metastasis (PSM) is a specific and challenging complication of laparoscopic gynecologic oncologic procedures. Research has demonstrated that PSM is associated with significant morbidity and poor outcome. The exact pathogenesis of PSM in gynecologic patients is not clear. Several preventive measures of PSM have been addressed in the relevant literature, and novel approaches to prevent this uncommon complication keep emerging. In this review, we summarized the potential mechanisms of PSM and discuss the controversies and merits of proposed preventive measures of PSM in gynecologic oncology. We undertook a literature search using the Medline database to identify studies on the pathogenesis and prevention of laparoscopic PSM. Hypotheses of PSM pathogeneses center on the immune response, pneumoperitoneum, wound contamination, and surgical method. Cogent evidence of effective prevention of PSM after laparoscopic surgery is lacking. Traditional preventive actions such as irrigation and tumor manipulation should be taken individually. Insufflation of hyperthermic CO₂ and humidified CO₂ leads to a better outcome in patients with a malignant tumor who undergo a laparoscopic procedure compared with normal CO₂ pneumoperitoneum. Port-site resection shows no advantage in survival and results in more wound events. PSM prevention plays a crucial part in the overall care of patients with gynecologic malignancies who undergo laparoscopic procedures.

Biodegradable Implants Combined with Immunogenic Chemotherapy and Immune Checkpoint Therapy for Peritoneal Metastatic Carcinoma Postoperative Treatment

Peritoneal seeding represents one of the most frequent sites of metastasis for late-stage gastrointestinal and gynecological cancer. At present, the major treatment method for peritoneal metastatic carcinoma (PMC) is the combination of cytoreductive surgery (CRS) with hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC). Nevertheless, the 5 year survival rate of patients after these treatments is still far from satisfactory. Here, we report a biodegradable implant co-loaded with doxorubicin (DOX) and anti-PD-1 monoclonal antibody (aPD-1) (BI@DOX+aPD-1) for a combination of immunogenic chemotherapy and immune checkpoint therapy for PMC postoperative treatment. The bio-implant is fabricated with oxidized dextran (ODEX) and 4-arm poly(ethylene glycol) amine (4-arm PEG-NH₂) by Schiff's base reaction at mild conditions, with DOX and aPD-1 loaded inside during and after the fabrication process, respectively. In vitro studies confirmed the slow and sustained release of DOX and aPD-1 from the bio-implants. In vivo studies showed that the bio-implants could be gradually degraded and maintain relatively high concentrations of therapeutic agents in the mouse abdomen. In a murine CT26 PMC model, the BI@DOX+aPD-1 resulted in a 89.7% tumor-suppression rate after peritoneal implantation. Importantly, the combination therapy of DOX and aPD-1 in the bio-implant showed an excellent synergistic effect with a Q value of 2.35. This easy-fabricated bio-implant combined with DOX and aPD-1 should be promising for clinical PMC postoperative treatment.

Surgical complications in colorectal cancer patients

BACKGROUND

Advancements in diagnostic and therapeutic sciences have allowed early diagnosis and treatment of cancer. Colorectal cancer is one of the most commonly reported cancers, particularly in elderly patients.

METHODS

Open and laparoscopic surgeries are used for the removal of the tumor, along with chemotherapy, depending on the stage of cancer. However, colorectal cancer surgery is associated with a great number of complications, that affect the efficacy of the surgery and overall health and survival of the patient.

RESULTS

Prevalence of these complications have shown discrepancies depending on the condition of the patient and disease and surgical skills of the surgeon. Preoperative evaluation, intraoperative care and postoperative measures can reduce the incidence of these complications.

CONCLUSION

This review highlights some frequently reported complications associated with colorectal cancer surgery, their risk factors and subsequent therapeutic measures to treat them.

Potential impact of invasive surgical procedures on primary tumor growth and metastasis

Surgical procedures such as tumor resection and biopsy are still the gold standard for diagnosis and (determination of) treatment of solid tumors, and are prognostically beneficial for patients. However, growing evidence suggests that even a minor surgical trauma can influence several (patho) physiological processes that might promote postoperative metastatic spread and tumor recurrence. Local effects include tumor seeding and a wound healing response that can promote tumor cell migration, proliferation, differentiation, extracellular matrix remodeling, angiogenesis and extravasation. In addition, local and systemic immunosuppression impairs antitumor immunity and contributes to tumor cell survival. Surgical manipulation of the tumor can result in cancer cell release into the circulation, thus increasing the chance of tumor cell dissemination. To prevent these undesired effects of surgical interventions, therapeutic strategies targeting immune response exacerbation or alteration have been proposed. This review summarizes the current literature regarding these local, systemic and secondary site effects of surgical interventions on tumor progression and dissemination, and discusses studies that aimed to identify potential therapeutic approaches to prevent these effects in order to further increase the clinical benefit from surgical procedures.

Ultrasound guided core needle biopsy prior to thermo ablative treatment of uterine tumors: first results

PURPOSE

This study aimed at evaluating the diagnostic yield for core needle biopsies of uterine fibroids before laparoscopic radiofrequency volumetric thermal ablation (RFVTA) with the aim of sonographic imaging. This study was in the context of a randomized, prospective, single-center, longitudinal comparative study in which RFVTA and laparoscopic myomectomy for symptomatic uterine fibroids were compared.

METHODS

All patients of the RFVTA-arm received a core needle biopsy under the guidance of an intraoperative laparoscopic ultrasound system. The Tissue samples were observed histologically.

RESULTS

24 patients were included and received in the median 3.17 biopsies (range 2-7). 45.8% of the fibroids were intramural. In 92% uterine leiomyoma was detected, in 4% a cell rich leiomyoma and in 4% a smooth muscle tumor with uncertain malignant potential (STUMP). There were no complications caused by core needle biopsy.

CONCLUSIONS

Ultrasound guided core needle biopsy can be used to receive a histological result before treating uterine fibroids with thermo surgical methods like RFVTA.