4D dose simulation in volumetric arc therapy: Accuracy and affecting parameters

Adoption of respiratory motion management in radiation therapy

Background and Purpose

A survey on the patterns of practice of respiratory motion management (MM) was distributed to 111 radiation therapy facilities to inform the development of an end-to-end dosimetry audit including respiratory motion.

Materials and methods

The survey (distributed via REDCap) asked facilities to provide information specific to the combinations of MM techniques (breath-hold gating – BHG, internal target volume – ITV, free-breathing gating – FBG, mid-ventilation – MidV, tumour tracking – TT), sites treated (thorax, upper abdomen, lower abdomen), and fractionation regimes (conventional, stereotactic ablative body radiation therapy – SABR) used in their clinic.

Results

The survey was completed by 78% of facilities, with 98% of respondents indicating that they used at least one form of MM. The ITV approach was common to all MM-users, used for thoracic treatments by 89% of respondents, and upper and lower abdominal treatments by 38%. BHG was the next most prevalent (41% of MM users), with applications in upper abdominal and thoracic treatment sites (28% vs 25% respectively), but minimal use in the lower abdomen (9%). FBG and TT were utilised sparingly (17%, 7% respectively), and MidV was not selected at all.

Conclusions

Two distinct treatment workflows (including use of motion limitation, imaging used for motion assessment, dose calculation, and image guidance procedures) were identified for the ITV and BHG MM techniques, to form the basis of the initial audit. Thoracic SABR with the ITV approach was common to nearly all respondents, while upper abdominal SABR using BHG stood out as more technically challenging. Other MM techniques were sparsely used, but may be considered for future audit development.

Technological quality requirements for stereotactic radiotherapy : Expert review group consensus from the DGMP Working Group for Physics and Technology in Stereotactic Radiotherapy

This review details and discusses the technological quality requirements to ensure the desired quality for stereotactic radiotherapy using photon external beam radiotherapy as defined by the DEGRO Working Group Radiosurgery and Stereotactic Radiotherapy and the DGMP Working Group for Physics and Technology in Stereotactic Radiotherapy. The covered aspects of this review are 1) imaging for target volume definition, 2) patient positioning and target volume localization, 3) motion management, 4) collimation of the irradiation and beam directions, 5) dose calculation, 6) treatment unit accuracy, and 7) dedicated quality assurance measures. For each part, an expert review for current state-of-the-art techniques and their particular technological quality requirement to reach the necessary accuracy for stereotactic radiotherapy divided into intracranial stereotactic radiosurgery in one single fraction (SRS), intracranial fractionated stereotactic radiotherapy (FSRT), and extracranial stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) is presented. All recommendations and suggestions for all mentioned aspects of stereotactic radiotherapy are formulated and related uncertainties and potential sources of error discussed. Additionally, further research and development needs in terms of insufficient data and unsolved problems for stereotactic radiotherapy are identified, which will serve as a basis for the future assignments of the DGMP Working Group for Physics and Technology in Stereotactic Radiotherapy. The review was group peer-reviewed, and consensus was obtained through multiple working group meetings.

Results of a multicentre dosimetry audit using a respiratory phantom within the EORTC LungTech trial

INTRODUCTION

The EORTC 22113-08113 LungTech trial assesses the safety and efficacy of SBRT for centrally located NSCLC. To insure protocol compliance an extensive RTQA procedure was implemented.

METHODS

Twelve centres were audited using a CIRS008A phantom. The phantom was scanned using target inserts of 7.5 mm and 12.5 mm radius in static condition. For the 7.5 mm insert a 4DCT was acquired while moving according to a cos⁶ function. Treatment plans were measured using film and an ionization chamber. Wilcoxon's signed-rank tests were performed to compare the three plans across institutions. A Spearman correlation was calculated to evaluate the influence of factors such as PTV, slice thickness and total number of monitor units on the dosimetric results.

RESULTS

The reference output dose median [min, max] variation was 0.5% [-1.1, +1.5]. The median deviations between chamber doses and point-planned doses were 1.8% [-0.1; 6.7] for the 7.5 mm and 1.1% [-2.8; 5.0] for the 12.5 mm sphere in static situation and 3.2% [-3.2; 15.7] for the dynamic situation. Film gamma median pass rates were 92.0% [68.0, 99.0] for 7.5 mm static, 96.2% [73.0, 99.0] for 12.5 mm static and 71.0% [40.0, 99.0] for 7.5 mm dynamic. Wilcoxon's signed-rank tests showed that the dynamic irradiations resulted in significantly lower gamma pass rates compared to the 12.5 mm static plan (p = 0.001). The total number of MUs per plan was correlated to both film and IC results.

CONCLUSION

An end-to-end audit was successfully performed, revealing important variations between institutions especially in dynamic irradiations. This shows the importance of dosimetry audits and the potentials for further technique and methodology improvements.

Dosimetric uncertainties as a result of temporal resolution in 4D dose calculations for PBS proton therapy

This work investigates the dosimetric impact on 4D dose distribution estimation for pencil beam scanned (PBS) proton therapy as function of the temporal resolution used for the time resolved dose calculation. For three liver patients (CTV volume: 403/122/264 cc), 10-phase 4DCT-MRI datasets with ~15 mm tumour motion were simulated for seven different motion periods (2-8 s). 4D dose distributions were calculated and compared by considering both coarser and finer temporal resolutions (200-800 ms and 20 ms). Single scanned 4D plans for seven fraction doses (0.7/2/4/6/8/10/12 Gy) were investigated, whose dose delivery timelines were simulated by assuming two types of PBS scanning modes: (1) layer-wise raster scanning with varying dose rate per layer and (2) fixed dose rate, discrete scanning. For both delivery scenarios, dosimetric assessments were performed by comparing corresponding dose distributions derived from the two 4D dose calculation (4DDC) results. Differences were quantified as the difference in D5-D95 of the CTV and by comparing total volume of the CTV receiving point-to-point absolute dose difference more than 5%. Our results show that varying temporal resolution in 4DDC has a direct influence on the final accumulated dose distribution. For all scenarios, patients, fraction doses and motion periods studied, pronounced dose differences can be observed between the two 4DDC results. However, the magnitude of differences varies depending on the selected PBS scanning model and prescribed dose per field. For fixed dose rate delivery, the average duration of the delivery of each spot increases for hypo-fractionated treatments, enhancing the benefit of using a finer temporal resolution for 4DDC. In particular, for fraction doses  >4 Gy and motion periods less than 4 s, warping the dose between discrete 4DCT phases can over predict the interplay effect (D5-D95 in CTV) by 3%-10% compared to the use of a finer temporal resolution, resulting in more than 20% of CTV voxels having absolute dose differences of over 5% between the two 4DDC approaches. These findings emphasize the importance for PBS 4DDC using finer temporal resolutions than provided by conventional 4D dose accumulation techniques. In particular, the observed differences in dosimetric effects using the fine temporal resolution provided by dose warping cannot be neglected for hypo-fractionation and short breathing periods, especially when using constant dose rates for dose delivery.

Influence of deformable image registration on 4D dose simulation for extracranial SBRT: A multi-registration framework study

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

To evaluate the influence of deformable image registration approaches on correspondence model-based 4D dose simulation in extracranial SBRT by means of open source deformable image registration (DIR) frameworks.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Established DIR algorithms of six different open source DIR frameworks were considered and registration accuracy evaluated using freely available 4D image data. Furthermore, correspondence models (regression-based correlation of external breathing signal measurements and internal structure motion field) were built and model accuracy evaluated. Finally, the DIR algorithms were applied for motion field estimation in radiotherapy planning 4D CT data of five lung and five liver lesion patients, correspondence model formation, and model-based 4D dose simulation. Deviations between the original, statically planned and the 4D-simulated VMAT dose distributions were analyzed and correlated to DIR accuracy differences.

RESULTS

Registration errors varied among the DIR approaches, with lower DIR accuracy translating into lower correspondence modeling accuracy. Yet, for lung metastases, indices of 4D-simulated dose distributions widely agreed, irrespective of DIR accuracy differences. In contrast, liver metastases 4D dose simulation results strongly vary for the different DIR approaches.

CONCLUSIONS

Especially in treatment areas with low image contrast (e.g. the liver), DIR-based 4D dose simulation results strongly depend on the applied DIR algorithm, drawing resulting dose simulations and indices questionable.