Ultrasound 2D strain measurement for arm lymphedema using deformable registration: A feasibility study

Ultrasonography as an instrument to evaluate lymphedema secondary to breast cancer: systematic review

Lymphedema is a chronic and progressive disease characterized by fluid accumulation, causing tissue edema as a result of a compromised lymphatic system. Diagnostic ultrasound (DUS) is a method capable of assessing soft tissue characteristics that can be used reliably to diagnose lymphedema as well as for measuring tissue compliance in a clinical setting. This is a systematic review, aiming to evaluate articles that made use of DUS in management of lymphedema secondary to breast cancer. A total of 570 articles were selected, exported to the Rayyan QCRI review program, and then screened by two researchers. From this search, 25 articles were selected after the authors reached consensus and were catalogued as to their main results. Diagnostic ultrasound was identified as an advantageous method that is safe, minimally invasive, low cost, and radiation free and is useful for evaluating the efficacy of therapies used in lymphedema treatment.

The Use of Ultrasound Imaging for Upper Extremity Lymphedema after Breast Cancer: A Systematic Review

BACKGROUND

 The aim of this study was to analyze the different applications of ultrasound (US) in upper extremity lymphedema (UEL) after breast cancer.

METHODS

 A systematic review of the literature was performed in line with the PRISMA statement using MEDLINE/PubMed databases from January 1970 to December 2021. Articles describing the application of US in patients with UEL after breast cancer were included. The quality of the study, the level of reproducibility, and the different applications and type of US technique were analyzed.

RESULTS

 In total, 30 articles with 1,193 patients were included in the final review. Five different applications were found: (1) diagnosis of UEL (14 studies found a direct correlation between lymphedema and morphological and/or functional parameters); (2) staging/severity of UEL (9 studies found a direct correlation between the clinical stage and the soft-tissue stiffness/texture/thickness); (3) therapeutic assessment (3 studies found an improvement in the circulatory status or in the muscle/subcutaneous thickness after conservative treatments); (4) prognosis assessment of UEL (1 study found a correlation between the venous flow and the risk of UEL); and (5) surgical planning (3 studies determined the location of the lymphatic vessel for lymphovenous anastomosis [LVA] surgery).

CONCLUSION

 Morphological and functional parameters have been correlated with the diagnosis, stage, therapeutic effect, prognosis of UEL, and surgical planning of LVA.

Acoustic Radiation Force Impulse Elastography Assessment of Lymphoedema Tissue: An Insight into Tissue Stiffness

Palpation remains essential for evaluating lymphoedema to detect subtle changes that may indicate progression. As palpation sense is not quantifiable, this study investigates the utility of ultrasound elastography to quantify stiffness of lymphoedema tissue and explore the influence of the pitting test on tissue stiffness. Fifteen women with unilateral arm lymphoedema were scanned using a Siemens S3000 Acuson ultrasound (Siemens, Germany) with 18 MHz and 9 MHz linear transducers to assess tissue structure and tissue stiffness with Acoustic Radiation Force Impulse elastography. Ninety sites were assessed, three on each of the lymphoedema-affected and contralateral unaffected arms. A subgroup of seven lymphoedema-affected sites included additional elastography imaging after a 60-s pitting test. Dermal tissue stiffness was greater than subcutaneous tissue stiffness regardless of the presence of pathology (p < 0.001). Lymphoedematous tissue exhibited a higher dermal to subcutaneous tissue stiffness ratio than contralateral sites (p = 0.005). Subgroup analysis indicated that the pitting test reduces dermal tissue stiffness (p = 0.018) and may alter the stiffness of the subcutaneous tissue layer. Elastography demonstrates potential as a complement to lymphoedema palpation assessment. The novel pre-test and post-pitting elastography imaging protocol yielded information representative of lymphoedema tissue characteristics that could not be ascertained from pre-test elastography images alone.

Relationship between lymphedema after breast cancer treatment and biophysical characteristics of the affected tissue

The treatment of breast cancer is often complicated by lymphedema of the upper limbs. Standard lymphedema evaluation methodologies are not able to measure tissue fibrosis. The ultrasound aspects related to tissue microstructures of lymphedema are neglected in clinical evaluations. The objective of this study was to identify and measure the degree of impairment, topography, and biophysical alterations of subcutaneous lymphedema tissue secondary to the treatment of breast cancer by ultrasonography. Forty-two women at a mean age of 58 (±9.7) years, with unilateral lymphedema due to breast cancer treatment, were evaluated. The upper limbs were divided into affected (affected by lymphedema) and control (contralateral limb). Each limb was subdivided into seven areas, defined by perimetry, evaluated in pairs. The biophysical characteristics thickness, entropy, and echogenicity were evaluated by ultrasonography. The results showed a significant difference in the echogenicity and thickness variables between the affected and unaffected upper limb, in all the extent of the upper limb, while entropy showed no significant difference. The findings indicate that the data presented were consistent both in identifying and measuring the degree of impairment and biophysical changes in the subcutaneous tissue of lymphedema secondary to the treatment of breast cancer.

The basics of ultrasound elastography for diagnosis, assessment, and staging breast cancer-related lymphedema: a systematic review of the literature

Breast cancer-related lymphedema (BCRL) incidence has been increasing overtime. Currently, there is not a preferred imaging tool for diagnosis, staging, and assessment of the disease. We aim to review the use of ultrasound elastography (UE) in BCRL patients. A systematic review was performed by querying PubMed, EMBASE, Ovid Healthstar, and Ovid Medline databases for studies that evaluated the use of UE in BCRL. The keywords "elastography" AND "lymphedema" in titles and abstracts were used for the search. The search retrieved 12, 12, 5 and 6 articles in each database, respectively. From these, only 4 met the inclusion criteria. UE methods included two-dimensional strain imaging, shear wave elastography (SWE), and global UE. Two of the studies evaluated the use of UE in the assessment of BCRL, while only 1 considered its use for diagnosis and staging. Based on our systematic review, UE appears to be a great tool in the assessment of BCRL to differentiate affected from non-affected arms.