Symphyseal fixation in open book injuries cannot fully compensate anterior SI joint injury-A biomechanical study in a two-leg alternating load model

Development and preclinical evaluation of a cable-clamp fixation device for a disrupted pubic symphysis

BACKGROUND

Traumatic separation of the pubic symphysis can destabilize the pelvis and require surgical fixation to reduce symphyseal gapping. The traditional approach involves open reduction and the implantation of a steel symphyseal plate (SP) on the pubic bone to hold the reposition. Despite its widespread use, SP-fixation is often associated with implant failure caused by screw loosening or breakage.

METHODS

To address the need for a more reliable surgical intervention, we developed and tested two titanium cable-clamp implants. The cable served as tensioning device while the clamp secured the cable to the bone. The first implant design included a steel cable anterior to the pubic symphysis to simplify its placement outside the pelvis, and the second design included a cable encircling the pubic symphysis to stabilize the anterior pelvic ring. Using highly reproducible synthetic bone models and a limited number of cadaver specimens, we performed a comprehensive biomechanical study of implant stability and evaluated surgical feasibility.

RESULTS

We were able to demonstrate that the cable-clamp implants provide stability equivalent to that of a traditional SP-fixation but without the same risks of implant failure. We also provide detailed ex vivo evaluations of the safety and feasibility of a trans-obturator surgical approach required for those kind of fixation.

CONCLUSION

We propose that the developed cable-clamp fixation devices may be of clinical value in treating pubic symphysis separation.

What happens at the L5/S1 facet joint when implants are placed across the sacroiliac joint?

BACKGROUND

Injuries to the posterior pelvic ring are often stabilized with fixation across the sacroiliac joint (SIJ). However, the compensatory changes at the neighboring L5/S1 facet joint are unknown. The objective of this study was to determine the compensatory change in pelvic kinematics and contact forces at the L5/S1 facet joint after fixation across the sacroiliac joint (SIJ) using a cadaveric model.

METHODS

Five fresh-frozen cadaveric pelvis specimens were dissected to remove non-structural soft tissue. Retroreflective markers were fixed to the L5 body, S1 body and bilateral anterior superior iliac spines to represent the motion of L5, S1 and the ileum, respectively. Pressure sensors were inserted in both L5/S1 facet joints. Testing was performed using a robotic system that applied load to mimic ambulation. Testing was performed prior to SIJ fixation, after unilateral SIJ fixation and bilateral fixation.

RESULTS

Contact force at the L5/S1 facet joint significantly increased by 55% from 48.4 N to 75.2 N following unilateral fixation (p = 0.0161) and increased by 100% to 96.9 N after bilateral fixation (p = 0.0038). Unilateral SIJ fixation increased flexion of the ilium relative to L5 from 1.2° to 2.0° (p = 0.01) and increased axial rotation of L5 relative to S1 from 0.7° to 1.6° (p = 0.001). Bilateral fixation increased flexion of the ilium relative to L5 to 2.0° from 1.2° prior to fixation (p = 0.001), increased axial rotation of L5 relative to S1 to 1.2° from 0.7° prior to fixation (p = 0.002) and increased flexion of L5 relative to S1 to 2.4° from 1.5° prior to fixation (p = 0.04).

CONCLUSION

The L5/S1 facet joint experiences compensatory increased motion under increased contact force after unilateral and bilateral SIJ fixation, possibly predisposing it to adjacent segment arthritis.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

V, cadaveric study.

No clinical advantage of locking over nonlocking plate fixation of symphyseal disruptions

PURPOSE

although locking plates have led to important changes in fracture management, becoming important tools in the orthopedic surgeon's arsenal, the benefits of locking plates for traumatic diastasis of the pubic symphysis have not been established. This study was conducted to assess the quality of life in its different domains among patients with traumatic diastasis of the pubic symphysis managed either with locking or nonlocking plate.

METHODS

a prospective cohort study was undertaken at 3 level 1 trauma centres in Brazil. Patients presenting traumatic diastasis of the pubic symphysis treated with plate fixation with a minimum follow-up of 12 months were eligible for inclusion. Through a Pfannenstiel approach, the pubic symphysis was reduced and fixed with a superiorly positioned 4.5mm four to six hole reconstruction locked plate or 3.5mm four to six hole reconstruction nonlocked plate. Posterior injury was managed during the same procedure. Outcome measures were adequate healing of the pelvic injuries, return to pre-injury level on daily activities, and quality of life at the last follow-up visit. Complications and modes of failure were summarized and reviewed. Bivariate linear regression was used to assess individual factors affecting patients' health-related quality of life. A p value of <5% was considered significant.

RESULTS

a total of 31 adult patients (29 males and 2 females) were eligible for the study. Thirteen patients were managed with a reconstruction locked plate and 18 patients with a nonlocked reconstruction plate. Average postoperative follow-up time was 24 months. Adequate healing of the pelvic injuries was achieved in 61.5% of patients treated with locking plates and 94.4% of patients treated with nonlocking plates (p=0.003). Radiographic failure of fixation with minor complications occurred in 46.1% of patients after locked plating versus 11.1% of patients in the nonlocking plate group (p=0.0003). In bivariate analysis, abnormal gait (p=0.007) was associated with a reduced long-term quality of life as measured with the EQ-5D-3L.

CONCLUSION

internal fixation of traumatic diastasis of the pubic symphysis with locking plates has no clinical advantage when compared to nonlocked plating. Mechanical failure and inadequate healing are significantly increased after locked plating of the pubic symphysis. Therefore, we do not recommend routine use of locking plates for managing patients presenting traumatic diastasis of the pubic symphysis.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

II (prospective, cohort study).

Can locking plate fixation of symphyseal disruptions allow early weight bearing?

INTRODUCTION

Anterior pubic symphyseal plate fixation is the recommended treatment for disruption of pubic symphysis in an unstable pelvic ring injury. The rigid construct offered by locking symphyseal plate has the theoretical advantage of allowing patients to weight bear early. However, there are concerns of catastrophic failure about the locked plate construct. The purpose of the study was to establish if locking plate fixation for pubic symphysis disruption was effective to allow patients to mobilise weight bearing immediately after surgery.

PATIENT AND METHODS

Retrospective analysis of a prospectively collected database from a single centre was performed. The study period was from 2008 to 2017. Radiographic evidence of fixation failure, revision surgery, removal of metalwork and follow up duration was noted.

RESULTS

We identified 46 patients (F:M 8:38) with a mean age of 46 years (range 14 to 74 years). Based on the mechanism of injury patients were classified into Antero-posterior compression (28), Vertical shear [10], lateral compression [4] and combined mechanism [4]. Either a 4-hole or 6-hole locking plate was used in all patients, depending on fracture extension. Posterior fixation was required in 28 (61%) patients. All patients were allowed to fully or partial weight bear. The mean radiological follow-up period was 31 weeks with 13 (28%) patients having evidence of radiological failure. Revision was performed in 1 (2%) patient, in whom the screws had pulled out of the bone. The most common mode of failure was either the screw backing out from the plate or broken screw. Among the 4 (8%) patients who had their metalwork removed, 1 (2%) had delayed onset of infection, 2 (4%) had symptoms related to backed out screw and 1 (2%) opted electively to have metalwork removed.

CONCLUSIONS

With our series of patients, we have found that using locking plate for pubic symphyseal diastasis is safe and effective in allowing patients to weight bear early. A low complication rate and need for re-operation is demonstrated.

Trans-obturator cable fixation of open book pelvic injuries

Operative treatment of ruptured pubic symphysis by plating is often accompanied by complications. Trans-obturator cable fixation might be a more reliable technique; however, have not yet been tested for stabilization of ruptured pubic symphysis. This study compares symphyseal trans-obturator cable fixation versus plating through biomechanical testing and evaluates safety in a cadaver experiment. APC type II injuries were generated in synthetic pelvic models and subsequently separated into three different groups. The anterior pelvic ring was fixed using a four-hole steel plate in Group A, a stainless steel cable in Group B, and a titan band in Group C. Biomechanical testing was conducted by a single-leg-stance model using a material testing machine under physiological load levels. A cadaver study was carried out to analyze the trans-obturator surgical approach. Peak-to-peak displacement, total displacement, plastic deformation and stiffness revealed a tendency for higher stability for trans-obturator cable/band fixation but no statistical difference to plating was detected. The cadaver study revealed a safe zone for cable passage with sufficient distance to the obturator canal. Trans-obturator cable fixation has the potential to become an alternative for symphyseal fixation with less complications.

The role of anterior supra-acetabular external fixator as definitive treatment for anterior ring fixation in unstable pelvic fractures

PURPOSE

Management of anterior ring injuries is still a matter of discussion, and there are only few studies reporting anterior external fixator as definitive treatment for unstable pelvic injuries. This study aimed to describe the clinical and radiological outcomes of a consecutive series of mechanically unstable pelvic injuries that were treated with definitive anterior supra-acetabular external fixator for the anterior ring, and to identify risk factors for failure.

METHODS

We included a consecutive series of patients with unstable pelvic ring fractures who underwent anterior supra-acetabular external fixation for definitive treatment, between January 2012 and January 2020. All demographics, associated injuries and procedures, injury mechanism, and complications were analysed. Pelvic fracture was classified based on Orthopaedic Trauma Association/Tile AO (OTA/AO) and Young-Burgess classifications. Complications associated with the external fixator were revised. All patients were functionally evaluated at final follow-up and asked to report their clinical outcomes using the Majeed score.

RESULTS

A total of 47 patients were included, of which 25 were females. The median age was 44 years (interquartile range 23-59). Median follow-up duration was 14 months (interquartile range 6-31). The most frequent aetiology was motor vehicle accident (35), followed by fall from height (8). All fractures required posterior pelvic ring fixation. The median time during which patients had external fixation in situ was 11 weeks (interquartile range 9-13). All patients achieved healing of pelvic fracture at median time of 10 weeks (interquartile range 8-12). At final follow-up, the median displacement of the anterior pelvis was 6 mm (interquartile range 0-11). Superficial infection was the most common complication (n = 7). No washout procedures were needed. No major complication was reported. No patient required reoperation for anterior ring fracture. The median Majeed score was 88 points (range 60-95; interquartile range 80-90) at final follow-up.

CONCLUSION

Our findings suggest that the use of supra-acetabular external fixator is safe and effective for definitive treatment of the anterior ring in unstable pelvic fractures. It is a method with high proportion of excellent results, regardless of the type of fracture. The rate of complications is low, and it does not compromise functional results.

[Outcome after plate stabilization of symphyseal diastasis]

Hintergrund

Die Symphysensprengung mit entsprechender Diastase kann durch eine Symphysenplatte stabilisiert werden.

Fragestellung

Welche Beckenverletzungen werden mit einer Symphysenplatte stabilisiert und wie ist das Outcome?

Material und Methoden

Retrospektive Auswertung von 64 Patienten über einen Untersuchungszeitraum von 24 Monaten.

Ergebnisse

Es waren 56 Patienten männlich, 8 weiblich und das mittlere Alter betrug 44 Jahre (SD ± 17). Unfälle im Straßenverkehr waren der führende Grund für die Beckenverletzung. Die Verteilung nach AO-Klassifikation zeigte sich wie folgt: 14-mal B1-, 10-mal B2-, 5‑mal B3-, 23-mal C1-, 9‑mal C2- und 3‑mal C3-Verletzungen. Die Verteilung nach Young und Burgess ergab: 9‑mal APC-I-, 18-mal APC-II-, 13-mal APC-III-, 9‑mal LC-I-, 3‑mal LC-II-, 2‑mal LC-III- und 10-mal VS-Verletzungen. Der mittlere Injury Severity Score (ISS) betrug 32 und die mittlere stationäre Verweildauer 29 Tage (pos. Korrelation p ≤ 0,001). Im Verlauf war eine radiologische Implantatlockerung bei 52 Patienten nachweisbar. Therapierelevante Komplikationen gab es in 14 Fällen. Hierbei war das Implantatversagen (n = 8) der Hauptgrund für eine operative Revision.

Diskussion

Obwohl die radiologische Implantatlockerung häufig beobachtet wird, ist sie nur selten Grund für einen Revisionseingriff. Kommt es hingegen zum vollständigen Implantatversagen, tritt dies meist innerhalb der ersten postoperativen Wochen auf und ist revisionsbedürftig. Eine frühzeitige Abklärung durch Röntgenbildgebung sollte bei Verdacht erfolgen.

The Anterior Subcutaneous Pelvic Ring Fixator: No Biomechanical Advantages Compared with External Fixation

BACKGROUND

Subcutaneous fixation of the anterior pelvic ring is an emerging surgical technique for trauma patients. The aim of this study was to biomechanically evaluate 2 internal fixation devices for stabilizing a disrupted pelvic ring and compare them with traditional external fixation.

METHODS

Thirty-six synthetic pelvises with a simulated unstable ring fracture (anteroposterior compression type III) were divided into 3 groups. Group A underwent fixation with a supra-acetabular external fixator; group B, with an internal fixator using the USS II polyaxial system; and group C, with an internal fixator using the Click'X polyaxial system. Biomechanical testing included measurement of peak-to-peak displacement at 300, 400, and 500 N; total displacement; plastic deformation; stiffness; and fracture-line displacement.

RESULTS

Statistical analysis of all measured parameters revealed no significant differences among the groups. However, vertical displacement of the preshaped connecting rod within the screw heads occurred as a result of inadequate stability of the internal fixation at the rod-screw interface.

CONCLUSIONS

Although internal fixator devices are placed close to the bone and should therefore maintain greater stiffness, our data did not support the hypothesis of superior stability. Special attention is required when using a curved connecting rod as the rod is easily displaced, placing relevant anatomical structures at risk. These devices require further refinement to avoid potential patient injury.

Pelvic ring fractures in the elderly

Pelvic ring fractures are rare injuries in the elderly though the incidence is increasing due to the increasing age of the population.

Main goal of treatment is the quickest possible re-mobilization to prevent side-effects of immobilization such as osteopenia, pulmonary infections or thromboembolic events.

Isolated anterior pelvic ring fractures are stable injuries and therefore they usually can be treated conservatively, while pelvic ring injuries with involvement of the posterior ring are considered unstable and should undergo surgical stabilization if the patient’s condition allows for it.

Conservative treatment includes adequate analgesia, guided mobilization with partial weight bearing if possible and osteoanabolic medication.

The appropriate surgical procedure should be discussed in an interdisciplinary round considering patient’s pre-injury condition, anaesthetic and surgical risks.

Cite this article: EFORT Open Rev 2019;4 DOI: 10.1302/2058-5241.4.180062