Methotrexate versus cyclophosphamide for remission maintenance in ANCA-associated vasculitis: A randomised trial

[Eosinophilic granulomatosis with polyangiitis: a review article]

Eosinophilic granulomatosis with polyangiitis (EGPA) is a rare form of ANCA-associated vasculitis (AAV) within the group of small vessel vasculitides. It is defined by vasculitis of small and medium-sized vessels with granulomatous inflammation and blood and tissue eosinophilia. Almost all patients have allergic symptoms with bronchial asthma and rhinosinusitis symptoms. Further clinical manifestations vary depending on the localisation, severity, and type of disease manifestation. Eosinophilic infiltration and inflammation may result in rhinosinusitis, pneumonitis, gastrointestinal involvement, and cardiomyopathy. The latter, in particular, is associated with a worse prognosis. As a necrotising pauci-immune small-vessel vasculitis, EGPA, similar to the other AAVs, can cause pulmonary infiltrates with alveolar haemorrhage, glomerulonephritis, cutaneous vasculitis with purpura as well as central and peripheral neurologic injuries. The presence of perinuclear ANCA (pANCA) with specificity against myeloperoxidase (MPO) is observed in approximately one-third of patients but is not specific to EGPA. MPO-ANCA-positive patients are more likely to have peripheral neurologic involvement and glomerulonephritis, whereas ANCA-negative patients are more likely to have cardiac and pulmonary involvement. What is frequently challenging in the clinical routine is to differentiate EGPA from the hypereosinophilic syndrome (HES). The therapeutic approach to EGPA depends on whether the severity of the disease is potentially organ or life-threatening. For severe forms of EGPA, acute therapy mainly includes glucocorticoids in combination with cyclophosphamide. Rituximab has come to be mentioned as an alternative treatment option in the guidelines. Various immunosuppressive therapies are available for remission maintenance. In EGPA without severe organ involvement, IL-5 blockade with mepolizumab is an approved treatment.

Treatment strategies for ANCA-associated vasculitides: from standard protocols to future horizons

INTRODUCTION

ANCA-associated vasculitides (AAV), classified into granulomatosis with polyangiitis, microscopic polyangiitis, and eosinophilic granulomatosis with polyangiitis represent a group of disorders characterized by necrotizing vasculitis of small vessels, endothelial injury and tissue damage. The outcomes and prognosis of AAV have undergone significant changes with the introduction of glucocorticoids (GCs) and other immunosuppressants (cyclophosphamide, azathioprine, methotrexate, and mycophenolate mofetil). The enhanced understanding of pathogenesis has subsequently led to the incorporation into clinical practice of drugs targeting specific therapeutic targets.

AREAS COVERED

After an extensive literature search of Pubmed, Medline, Embase of the most recent evidence, we provide an overview of available treatments, highlighting how newer drugs have integrated into standard protocols. Our review also explores potential new therapeutic targets, including B cell depletion and inhibition, T cell inhibition, complement inhibition, and IL-5 and IgE inhibition.

EXPERT OPINION

There is hope that the new treatment targets currently under study in AAV may enable a faster and more lasting clinical response, ensuring the reduction of possible side effects from therapies. Moreover, numerous aspects necessitate further exploration in the future, such as tailoring of GCs, integration of GCs-sparing agents, efficacy of combination therapy, optimal maintenance therapy, to reduce organ-damage and improve quality of life.

Clinical and Therapeutic Intervention of Hypereosinophilia in the Era of Molecular Diagnosis

Hypereosinophilia (HE) presents with an elevated peripheral eosinophilic count of >1.5 × 109/L and is composed of a broad spectrum of secondary non-hematologic disorders and a minority of primary hematologic processes with heterogenous clinical presentations, ranging from mild symptoms to potentially lethal outcome secondary to end-organ damage. Following the introduction of advanced molecular diagnostics (genomic studies, RNA sequencing, and targeted gene mutation profile, etc.) in the last 1-2 decades, there have been deep insights into the etiology and molecular mechanisms involved in the development of HE. The classification of HE has been updated and refined following to the discovery of clinically novel markers and targets in the 2022 WHO classification and ICOG-EO 2021 Working Conference on Eosinophil Disorder and Syndromes. However, the diagnosis and management of HE is challenging given its heterogeneity and variable clinical outcome. It is critical to have a diagnostic algorithm for accurate subclassification of HE and hypereosinophilic syndrome (HES) (e.g., reactive, familial, idiopathic, myeloid/lymphoid neoplasm, organ restricted, or with unknown significance) and to follow established treatment guidelines for patients based on its clinical findings and risk stratification.

Primary angiitis of the CNS and ANCA-associated vasculitis: from pathology to treatment

Vasculitis of the central nervous system can be a localized process, such as primary angiitis of the central nervous system (PACNS), or systemic vasculitis, such as ANCA-associated vasculitis (AAV). Since both conditions share neurological manifestations, the following review will discuss the neurological aspects of both. This review aims to provide a comprehensive comparison of the pathogenesis, clinical manifestation and assessment, diagnostic workup, and treatment protocol for both PACNS and AAV with central nervous system involvement. To provide a comprehensive comparison and update, a literature review was conducted using PubMed and Ovid databases (Embase and Medline). Then, the references were retrieved, screened, and selected according to the inclusion and exclusion criteria. PACNS and AAV share similarities in clinical presentation and neurological symptoms, especially in terms of headache, focal deficits, and cognitive impairment. Additionally, both conditions may exhibit similarities in laboratory and radiological findings, making brain biopsy the gold standard for differentiation between the two conditions. Moreover, the treatment protocols for PACNS and AAV are nearly identical. Comparing PACNS and AAV with CNS involvement highlights the similarities in clinical presentation, radiological findings, and treatment protocols between the two conditions. Further research should focus on establishing a practical diagnostic protocol.

EULAR recommendations for the management of ANCA-associated vasculitis: 2022 update

BACKGROUND

Since the publication of the EULAR recommendations for the management of antineutrophil cytoplasmic antibody (ANCA)-associated vasculitis (AAV) in 2016, several randomised clinical trials have been published that have the potential to change clinical care and support the need for an update.

METHODS

Using EULAR standardised operating procedures, the EULAR task force undertook a systematic literature review and sought opinion from 20 experts from 16 countries. We modified existing recommendations and created new recommendations.

RESULTS

Four overarching principles and 17 recommendations were formulated. We recommend biopsies and ANCA testing to assist in establishing a diagnosis of AAV. For remission induction in life-threatening or organ-threatening AAV, we recommend a combination of high-dose glucocorticoids (GCs) in combination with either rituximab or cyclophosphamide. We recommend tapering of the GC dose to a target of 5 mg prednisolone equivalent/day within 4-5 months. Avacopan may be considered as part of a strategy to reduce exposure to GC in granulomatosis with polyangiitis (GPA) or microscopic polyangiitis (MPA). Plasma exchange may be considered in patients with rapidly progressive glomerulonephritis. For remission maintenance of GPA/MPA, we recommend rituximab. In patients with relapsing or refractory eosinophilic GPA, we recommend the use of mepolizumab. Azathioprine and methotrexate are alternatives to biologics for remission maintenance in AAV.

CONCLUSIONS

In the light of recent advancements, these recommendations provide updated guidance on AAV management. As substantial data gaps still exist, informed decision-making between physicians and patients remains of key relevance.

Renal involvement in eosinophilic granulomatosis with polyangiitis

Eosinophilic granulomatosis with polyangiitis (EGPA) is a necrotizing vasculitis, which typically affects small-to medium-sized blood vessels. It is characterized by the presence of tissue infiltrates rich in eosinophils, along with the formation of granulomatous lesions. About 40% of cases have positive anti-neutrophil cytoplasm antibodies (ANCA), with predominant perinuclear staining, and anti-myeloperoxidase (anti-MPO) specificity in about 65% of cases. Typical manifestations of EGPA include the late onset of asthma, nasal and sinus-related symptoms, peripheral neuropathy, and significant eosinophilia observed in the peripheral blood. In contrast to granulomatosis with polyangiitis and microscopic polyangiitis, renal involvement in EGPA is less frequent (about 25%) and poorly studied. Necrotizing pauci-immune crescentic glomerulonephritis is the most common renal presentation in patients with ANCA-positive EGPA. Although rarely, other forms of renal involvement may also be observed, such as eosinophilic interstitial nephritis, mesangial glomerulonephritis, membranous nephropathy, or focal sclerosis. A standardized treatment for EGPA with renal involvement has not been defined, however the survival and the renal outcomes are usually better than in the other ANCA-associated vasculitides. Nonetheless, kidney disease is an adverse prognostic factor for EGPA patients. Larger studies are required to better describe the renal involvement, in particular for patterns different from crescentic glomerulonephritis, and to favor the development of a consensual therapeutic approach. In this article, in addition to personal data, we will review recent findings on patient clinical phenotypes based on ANCA, genetics and the impact of biological drugs on disease management.

Overlapping Autoimmune Diseases: A Case Report and Review of Eosinophilic Granulomatosis With Polyangiitis and Mixed Connective Tissue Disease

We describe a rare case of concurrent eosinophilic granulomatosis with polyangiitis and mixed connective tissue disease in a 27-year-old man who presented with pulmonary, renal, cardiac, and skin manifestations. We confirmed the diagnosis based on clinical, histopathological, and serological criteria. We treated the patient with corticosteroids, methotrexate, cyclophosphamide, and hydroxychloroquine, achieving early remission. The coexistence of both conditions in the same patient is extremely rare and has only been reported in a few cases worldwide. We also review the literature on these two rare autoimmune diseases' coexistence, pathogenesis, diagnosis, and management. Our case emphasizes recognizing overlapping autoimmune conditions in patients with complex clinical features and employing a comprehensive diagnostic approach and tailored treatment strategies. Further research is needed to understand these patients' epidemiology, prognosis, and optimal therapy. Early diagnosis and aggressive immunosuppression are crucial for achieving remission and preventing organ damage. We also identified the knowledge gaps and research needs in this field.

Systematic literature review informing the 2022 update of the EULAR recommendations for the management of ANCA-associated vasculitis (AAV): part 1-treatment of granulomatosis with polyangiitis and microscopic polyangiitis

OBJECTIVE

To summarise and update evidence to inform the 2022 update of the EULAR recommendations for the management of antineutrophil cytoplasm antibody-associated vasculitis (AAV).

METHODS

A systematic literature review (SLR) was performed to identify current evidence regarding treatment of AAV. PubMed, EMBASE and the Cochrane library were searched from 1 February 2015 to 25 February 2022. The evidence presented here is focused on the treatment of granulomatosis with polyangiitis and microscopic polyangiitis.

RESULTS

3517 articles were screened and 175 assessed by full-text review. Ninety articles were included in the final evidence synthesis. Cyclophosphamide and rituximab (RTX) show similar efficacy for remission induction (level of evidence (LoE) 1a) but RTX is more effective in relapsing disease (LoE 1b). Glucocorticoid (GC) protocols with faster tapering result in similar remission rates but lower rates of serious infections (LoE 1b). Avacopan can be used to rapidly taper and replace GC (LoE 1b). Data on plasma exchange are inconsistent depending on the analysed trial populations but meta-analyses based on randomised controlled trials demonstrate a reduction of the risk of end-stage kidney disease at 1 year but not during long-term follow-up (LoE 1a). Use of RTX for maintenance of remission is associated with lower relapse rates compared with azathioprine (AZA, LoE 1b). Prolonged maintenance treatment results in lower relapse rates for both, AZA (LoE 1b) and RTX (LoE 1b).

CONCLUSION

This SLR provides current evidence to inform the 2022 update of the EULAR recommendations for the management of AAV.

Evidence-Based Guideline for the diagnosis and management of eosinophilic granulomatosis with polyangiitis

Eosinophilic granulomatosis with polyangiitis (EGPA) is a rare anti-neutrophil cytoplasmic antibody (ANCA)-associated vasculitis, characterized by asthma, eosinophilia and granulomatous or vasculitic involvement of several organs. The diagnosis and management of EGPA are often challenging and require an integrated, multidisciplinary approach. Current practice relies on recommendations and guidelines addressing the management of ANCA-associated vasculitis and not specifically developed for EGPA. Here, we present evidence-based, cross-discipline guidelines for the diagnosis and management of EGPA that reflect the substantial advances that have been made in the past few years in understanding the pathogenesis, clinical subphenotypes and differential diagnosis of the disease, as well as the availability of new treatment options. Developed by a panel of European experts on the basis of literature reviews and, where appropriate, expert opinion, the 16 statements and five overarching principles cover the diagnosis and staging, treatment, outcome and follow-up of EGPA. These recommendations are primarily intended to be used by healthcare professionals, pharmaceutical industries and drug regulatory authorities, to guide clinical practice and decision-making in EGPA. These guidelines are not intended to limit access to medications by healthcare agencies, nor to impose a fixed order on medication use.

[Eosinophilia: hypereosinophilic syndrome vs. eosinophilic granulomatosis with polyangiitis]

Hypereosinophilic syndrome (HES) is defined as a peripheral eosinophil count of > 1500/μl (assessed twice at an interval of ≥ 2 weeks) and an eosinophil-induced organ damage. Idiopathic HES is differentiated from primary (clonal or neoplastic) HES and secondary (reactive) HES, depending on the etiology. Eosinophilic granulomatosis with polyangiitis (EGPA) is categorized as a secondary form of HES and is characterized by hypereosinophilia and vasculitis of small to medium-sized vessels and can be associated with an antineutrophil cytoplasmic antibody (ANCA). The treatment of HES is dependent on the etiology. Clonal HES is treated according to the respective genetic aberration, e.g. with tyrosine kinase inhibitors or chemotherapy and allogenic stem cell transplantation. Secondary forms should be treated according to the underlying cause (e.g. parasitic infection). The treatment of EGPA is carried out with immunosuppressants depending on the disease stage and disease activity. Conventional drugs, such as glucocorticoids (GC), cyclophosphamide (CYC) and methotrexate (MTX) or biologics, such as the monoclonal anti-IL5 antibody mepolizumab are commonly used. Mepolizumab is also a good option for the treatment of idiopathic HES.

Treatments of refractory eosinophilic lung diseases with biologics

Biologics targeting the molecules associated with type 2 inflammation have significantly improved the outcomes of patients with severe eosinophilic asthma and chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps (CRSwNP). Chronic eosinophilic airway/lung diseases including chronic eosinophilic pneumonia, allergic bronchopulmonary aspergillosis/mycosis, eosinophilic bronchitis, and eosinophilic granulomatosis with polyangiitis share clinical features with eosinophilic asthma and CRPwNP, which are mostly adult-onset and may develop simultaneously or consecutively. These eosinophilic airway/lung diseases respond well to initial treatment with systemic corticosteroids, but often recur when the corticosteroids are tapered. The management of these "refractory" cases is an unmet need for clinicians. We first reviewed the standard treatments for these chronic eosinophilic airway/lung diseases, followed by the definition and prevalence of refractory diseases and the role of biologics in their management. The available evidence varies from case reports and case series to randomized control trials, depending on the type of disease; however, these studies provide not only a direction for clinical practice, but also insights into the pathophysiology of each disease. Physicians should discuss the efficacy and costs of biologics in patients with refractory eosinophilic airway/lung diseases to minimize not only the current symptoms, but future risks as well.

Eosinophile Granulomatose mit Polyangiitis – ein Übersichtsartikel

Die eosinophile Granulomatose mit Polyangiitis (EGPA) ist eine seltene Form der ANCA-assoziierten Vaskulitiden (AAV) aus der Gruppe der Kleingefäßvaskulitiden. Sie ist definiert als eine Vaskulitis kleiner und mittelgroßer Gefäße mit granulomatöser Entzündung sowie Blut- und Gewebseosinophilie. Fast alle Patienten haben allergische Symptome mit Asthma bronchiale und rhinosinusitischen Beschwerden. Das sonstige klinische Spektrum variiert je nach Lokalisation, Schweregrad und Art der Krankheitsmanifestation. Durch die eosinophile Infiltration und Inflammation kann es zu Rhinosinusitis, Pneumonitis, gastrointestinaler Beteiligung und Kardiomyopathie kommen. Insbesondere Letztere ist mit einer schlechteren Prognose assoziiert. Als nekrotisierende pauci-immune Kleingefäßvaskulitis kann die EGPA, ähnlich wie die anderen AAV, pulmonale Infiltrate mit alveolärer Hämorrhagie, eine Glomerulonephritis, kutane Vaskulitis mit Purpura, sowie zentrale und periphere neurologische Schädigungen verursachen. Das Auftreten perinukleärer ANCA (pANCA), mit Spezifität gegen die Myeloperoxidase (MPO) wird in etwa einem Drittel der Fälle beobachtet, ist allerdings nicht spezifisch für die EGPA. MPO-ANCA-positive Patienten haben häufiger eine periphere neurologische Beteiligung und eine Glomerulonephritis, während ANCA-negative Patienten häufiger eine kardiale und pulmonale Beteiligung aufweisen. Eine differentialdiagnostische Herausforderung im klinischen Alltag stellt die Abgrenzung zum hypereosinophilen Syndrom (HES) dar. Das Therapiekonzept der EGPA hängt davon ab, ob der Schweregrad der Erkrankung potentiell Organ- oder lebensbedrohlich ist. Bei schweren Formen der EGPA werden in der Akuttherapie hauptsächlich Glukokortikoide in Kombination mit Cyclophosphamid eingesetzt. Rituximab wird mittlerweile als alternative Behandlungsoption in den Leitlinien genannt. Zur Remissionserhaltung stehen verschiedene immunsuppressive Therapien zur Verfügung. Bei EGPA ohne schwere Organbeteiligung ist die IL-5 Blockade mit Mepolizumab zugelassen.

At the Heart of Eosinophilic Granulomatosis with Polyangiitis: into Cardiac and Vascular Involvement

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

To provide an overview of existing literature on pathogenetic and clinical aspects of cardiac and vascular involvement in eosinophilic granulomatosis with polyangiitis (EGPA).

RECENT FINDINGS

In EGPA, cardiac and vascular involvement are more common than previously thought. However, no international recommendations on the topic are available yet. Herein, we summarize the existing evidence on the topic and propose a diagnostic approach for cardiac involvement in EGPA. The prevalence of cardiovascular involvement in patients with EGPA varies greatly among published studies, ranging between 3.1-18.7% for occlusive arterial disease, 5.8-30% for venous thrombosis and 17-92% for heart involvement. Cardiac involvement in EGPA is associated with high mortality even though manifestations are heterogeneous. In principle, every anatomical structure of the heart can be involved, and EGPA-related heart disease may be completely asymptomatic at first. A careful diagnostic work-up for early detection and prompt treatment initiation is therefore required. While cardiac manifestations are more common in anti-neutrophil cytoplasmic antibodies (ANCA)-negative patients, arterial and venous thrombotic events are not linked to ANCA status but correlate closely with disease activity and accumulate at disease onset. Thrombotic events (mainly venous) are considerably more frequent in EGPA than in the general population contributing substantially to morbidity and highlighting the importance of developing specific prevention strategies for patients who are diagnosed with EGPA.

Eosinophilic Granulomatosis with Polyangiitis

This review aims to describe the epidemiology, pathogenesis, clinical manifestations, diagnosis, treatment, and prognosis of eosinophilic granulomatosis with polyangiitis (EGPA). Eosinophilic granulomatosis with polyangiitis is a small to medium vessel necrotizing vasculitis, typically classified with granulomatosis with polyangiitis (GPA) and microscopic polyangitis (MPA) as antineutrophil cytoplasmic antibody (ANCA)-associated vasculitis (AAV). However, less than 50% of patients with EGPA have a positive ANCA test. Among all the vasculitides, asthma and eosinophilia are unique features of EGPA. Eosinophilic granulomatosis with polyangiitis is very rare and the diagnosis may be missed as the disease evolves over time. Polyneuropathies are common and may be severe, requiring aggressive immunosuppressive therapy. Heart involvement is the most common cause of death in EGPA. Biopsy of involved tissue supports a clinically suspected diagnosis but is not always feasible. Treatment of EGPA is primarily dictated by the severity of disease and prognostic factors. More severe disease frequently requires the use of aggressive therapy such as cyclophosphamide. Once treatment is initiated, patients can achieve good control of symptoms; unfortunately, disease relapses are common and prolonged treatment with corticosteroids is often necessary for asthma management. A better understanding of the disease heterogeneity is needed for the development of better therapies.

A meta-analysis of the safety and efficacy of maintenance therapies for anti-neutrophil cytoplasmic antibody small-vessel vasculitis

Introduction

To compare the efficacy and safety of different regimens used for maintenance of remission in patients with antineutrophil cytoplasmic antibody (ANCA) vasculitis.

Methods

This network meta-analysis studied adult patients with ANCA vasculitis in complete remission, who were maintained with various regimens, excluding patients with eosinophilic granulomatosis with polyangiitis (GPA) and those who have ended up in end-stage kidney disease. Outcomes of interest included relapse (any/major), relapse-free survival, and adverse effects. PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), ClinicalTrials.gov, and Google Scholar were systematically searched from inception.

Results

Overall, the meta-analysis was based on 10 reports, describing the outcomes of 7 randomized controlled trials (RCTs) including 752 patients with ANCA vasculitis. Relapse-free survival was significantly worse with the use of azathioprine (hazard ratio [HR]: 2.11, 95% CI: 1.19–3.74), methotrexate (HR: 2.51, 95% CI: 1.24–5.08), and mycophenolate mofetil (HR: 3.57, 95% CI: 1.70–7.46) compared with the use of rituximab. Outcomes estimated for azathioprine (HR: 0.59, 95% CI: 0.37–0.94), cyclophosphamide (HR: 0.39, 95% CI: 0.20–0.75), and leflunomide (HR: 0.30, 95% CI: 0.11–0.84) were better than those for mycophenolate mofetil. When examining relapse-free survival, relapses were more likely with use of azathioprine (odds ratio [OR]: 2.15, 95% CI: 1.00–4.59) and mycophenolate mofetil (OR: 4.42, 95% CI: 1.63–11.94) compared with the use of rituximab. The risk of major relapse calculated for azathioprine (OR: 2.39, 95% CI: 1.10–5.19), methotrexate (OR: 3.18, 95% CI: 1.14–8.89), and mycophenolate mofetil (OR: 5.20, 95% CI: 1.65–16.37) was higher than that for rituximab. The rates of serious adverse effects did not differ significantly among interventions.

Conclusion

Rituximab appears predominant in maintaining remission in patients with ANCA vasculitis with no cost in adverse events.

2021 American College of Rheumatology/Vasculitis Foundation Guideline for the Management of Antineutrophil Cytoplasmic Antibody-Associated Vasculitis

OBJECTIVE

To provide evidence-based recommendations and expert guidance for the management of antineutrophil cytoplasmic antibody-associated vasculitis (AAV), including granulomatosis with polyangiitis (GPA), microscopic polyangiitis (MPA), and eosinophilic granulomatosis with polyangiitis (EGPA).

METHODS

Clinical questions regarding the treatment and management of AAV were developed in the population, intervention, comparator, and outcome (PICO) format (47 for GPA/MPA, 34 for EGPA). Systematic literature reviews were conducted for each PICO question. The Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation methodology was used to assess the quality of evidence and formulate recommendations. Each recommendation required ≥70% consensus among the Voting Panel.

RESULTS

We present 26 recommendations and 5 ungraded position statements for GPA/MPA, and 15 recommendations and 5 ungraded position statements for EGPA. This guideline provides recommendations for remission induction and maintenance therapy as well as adjunctive treatment strategies in GPA, MPA, and EGPA. These recommendations include the use of rituximab for remission induction and maintenance in severe GPA and MPA and the use of mepolizumab in nonsevere EGPA. All recommendations are conditional due in part to the lack of multiple randomized controlled trials and/or low-quality evidence supporting the recommendations.

CONCLUSION

This guideline presents the first recommendations endorsed by the American College of Rheumatology and the Vasculitis Foundation for the management of AAV and provides guidance to health care professionals on how to treat these diseases.

2021 American College of Rheumatology/Vasculitis Foundation Guideline for the Management of Antineutrophil Cytoplasmic Antibody-Associated Vasculitis

OBJECTIVE

To provide evidence-based recommendations and expert guidance for the management of antineutrophil cytoplasmic antibody-associated vasculitis (AAV), including granulomatosis with polyangiitis (GPA), microscopic polyangiitis (MPA), and eosinophilic granulomatosis with polyangiitis (EGPA).

METHODS

Clinical questions regarding the treatment and management of AAV were developed in the population, intervention, comparator, and outcome (PICO) format (47 for GPA/MPA, 34 for EGPA). Systematic literature reviews were conducted for each PICO question. The Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation methodology was used to assess the quality of evidence and formulate recommendations. Each recommendation required ≥70% consensus among the Voting Panel.

RESULTS

We present 26 recommendations and 5 ungraded position statements for GPA/MPA, and 15 recommendations and 5 ungraded position statements for EGPA. This guideline provides recommendations for remission induction and maintenance therapy as well as adjunctive treatment strategies in GPA, MPA, and EGPA. These recommendations include the use of rituximab for remission induction and maintenance in severe GPA and MPA and the use of mepolizumab in nonsevere EGPA. All recommendations are conditional due in part to the lack of multiple randomized controlled trials and/or low-quality evidence supporting the recommendations.

CONCLUSION

This guideline presents the first recommendations endorsed by the American College of Rheumatology and the Vasculitis Foundation for the management of AAV and provides guidance to health care professionals on how to treat these diseases.

Treatment Updates in Antineutrophil Cytoplasmic Autoantibodies (ANCA) Vasculitis

ANCA vasculitis is a small-vessel vasculitis (SVV) resulting in inflammation of small- and medium-sized blood vessels. Since the initial description of SVV, there have been tremendous advances in our understanding of its pathogenesis. Over the last decade, we have made significant progress in understanding the pathogenesis and improving the treatment and prognosis of patients with ANCA vasculitis. Patient and renal survival has improved, and treatment is moving toward individualizing care, minimizing severe adverse events, and preventing relapse. This review focuses on treatment updates in ANCA vasculitis, duration of therapy, and management of relapses. We also describe the existing treatment protocols used at our institution.

Eosinophilic Granulomatosis with Polyangiitis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Test Accuracy and Benefits and Harms of Common Treatments

Objective

Eosinophilic granulomatosis with polyangiitis (EGPA) is part of a group of vasculitides commonly referred to as antineutrophil cytoplasmic antibody (ANCA)–associated vasculitis (AAV), in addition to granulomatosis with polyangiitis (GPA), microscopic polyangiitis (MPA), and renal‐limited vasculitis. Patients with EGPA characteristically have asthma and marked peripheral eosinophilia with only approximately 30% to 35% of patients being myeloperoxidase (MPO)‐ANCA positive, distinguishing it from other forms of AAV (1,2). The aim of this systematic review is to support the development of the American College of Rheumatology/Vasculitis Foundation guideline for the management of EGPA.

Methods

A systematic review was conducted of the literature for seven forms of primary systemic vasculitis (GPA, MPA, EGPA, polyarteritis nodosa, Kawasaki disease, giant cell arteritis, and Takayasu arteritis). The search was done for articles in English using Ovid Medline, PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Library. Articles were screened for suitability in addressing population/patients, intervention, comparator, and outcomes (PICO) questions, with studies presenting the highest level of evidence given preference. Two independent reviewers conducted a title/abstract screen and full‐text review for each eligible study.

Results

The initial search, conducted in August 2019, included 13 800 articles, of which 2596 full‐text articles were reviewed. There were 190 articles (addressing 34 PICO questions) reporting on the diagnosis and management of EGPA.

Conclusion

This comprehensive systematic review synthesizes and evaluates the accuracy of commonly used tests for EGPA as well as benefits and toxicities of different treatment options.

Effectiveness and safety of methotrexate versus leflunomide in 12-month treatment for Takayasu arteritis

Aims:

The study investigates the effectiveness and safety of methotrexate (MTX) versus leflunomide (LEF) in 12-month treatment of Takayasu arteritis (TAK).

Methods:

This was a cohort study. Patients diagnosed with TAK between 1 January 2013 and 1 January 2019 were enrolled from First Hospital of China Medical University and Zhongshan Hospital of Fudan University. Patients had active disease and were treated with glucocorticoid combined with LEF or MTX. Treatment response, imaging assessment and side-effects were evaluated during 12-month follow-up.

Results:

In total, 68 patients were enrolled (40 cases treated with LEF and 28 treated with MTX). At baseline, age, sex, disease duration and disease activity index showed no significant differences between groups. Prevalence of complete remission (CR) at 6 months was significantly higher in the LEF group than that in the MTX group (LEF versus MTX: 72.50% versus 53.57%, p = 0.04), though the CR prevalence at 9 months and 12 months showed no significant differences between groups. At 9 months, the prevalence of treatment resistance was much lower in the LEF group compared with MTX group (5.41% versus 11.54%, p = 0.03). Furthermore, prevalence of disease relapse in the LEF group was lower than that in MTX group at 12 months (7.24% versus 16.67%, p = 0.03). Patients with high baseline C-reactive protein levels (⩾15 mg/L) carried a higher risk of treatment resistance (OR = 1.36, 95% CI 1.07–13.41, p = 0.06) and disease relapse (HR = 2.51, 95% CI 1.36–12.98, p = 0.04).

Conclusion:

LEF might provide a quicker treatment response with lower prevalence of disease relapse compared with that elicited in MTX during 12 months follow-up for TAK.

Adult-onset IgA vasculitis (Henoch-Schönlein): Update on therapy

Immunoglobulin A vasculitis (IgAV, formerly Henoch-Schönlein purpura) is a systemic inflammatory disease affecting small vessels. While it is common and usually benign in childhood, in adults it is rarer has a more severe course. Its main manifestations are cutaneous purpura, arthralgias or arthritis, acute enteritis and glomerulonephritis. Renal involvement is associated with a poor prognosis in adults. The treatment of adult-onset IgAV is still a matter of debate: although in patients with a non-severe phenotype remission can occur spontaneously, more severe cases may need immunosuppressive therapy. There are some areas of uncertainty with respect to the efficacy of immunosuppressive regimens: almost all data come from studies performed in children or from patients with IgA nephropathy and/or IgA-crescentic glomerulonephritis. The only randomised study performed in adults with IgAV and renal involvement showed that immunosuppressive therapy with cyclophosphamide did not improve renal outcome nor did it affect patient survival. The possible efficacy of other drugs is reported only in small case series. Recent evidences show that rituximab could be an effective therapeutic option for adult-onset IgAV, but this also needs to be confirmed in controlled trials. In this review, we focus on therapeutic options for adult-onset IgAV treatment, and discuss the main results of the studies performed so far.

Interventions for renal vasculitis in adults

BACKGROUND

Renal vasculitis presents as rapidly progressive glomerulonephritis and comprises of a group of conditions characterised by acute kidney injury (AKI), haematuria and proteinuria. Treatment of these conditions involve the use of steroid and non-steroid agents in combination with plasma exchange. Although immunosuppression overall has been very successful in treatment of these conditions, many questions remain unanswered in terms of dose and duration of therapy, the use of plasma exchange and the role of new therapies. This 2019 publication is an update of a review first published in 2008 and updated in 2015.

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the benefits and harms of any intervention used for the treatment of renal vasculitis in adults.

SEARCH METHODS

We searched the Cochrane Kidney and Transplant Register of Studies up to 21 November 2019 through contact with the Information Specialist using search terms relevant to this review. Studies in the Register are identified through searches of CENTRAL, MEDLINE, and EMBASE, conference proceedings, the International Clinical Trials Register (ICTRP) Search Portal and ClinicalTrials.gov.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Randomised controlled trials investigating any intervention for the treatment of renal vasculitis in adults.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two authors independently assessed study quality and extracted data. Statistical analyses were performed using a random effects model and results expressed as risk ratio (RR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) for dichotomous outcomes or mean difference (MD) for continuous outcomes.

MAIN RESULTS

Forty studies (3764 patients) were included. Studies conducted earlier tended to have a higher risk of bias due to poor (or poorly reported) study design, broad inclusion criteria, less well developed disease definitions and low patient numbers. Later studies tend to have improved in all areas of quality, aided by the development of large international study groups. Induction therapy: Plasma exchange as adjunctive therapy may reduce the need for dialysis at three (2 studies: RR 0.43, 95% CI 0.23 to 0.78; I² = 0%) and 12 months (6 studies: RR 0.45, 95% CI 0.29 to 0.72; I² = 0%) (low certainty evidence). Plasma exchange may make little or no difference to death, serum creatinine (SCr), sustained remission or to serious or the total number of adverse events. Plasma exchange may increase the number of serious infections (5 studies: RR 1.26, 95% CI 1.03 to 1.54; I² = 0%; low certainty evidence). Remission rates for pulse versus continuous cyclophosphamide (CPA) were equivalent but pulse treatment may increase the risk of relapse (4 studies: RR 1.79, 95% CI 1.11 to 2.87; I² = 0%) (low certainty evidence) compared with continuous cyclophosphamide. Pulse CPA may make little or no difference to death at final follow-up, or SCr at any time point. More patients required dialysis in the pulse CPA group. Leukopenia was less common with pulse treatment; however, nausea was more common. Rituximab compared to CPA probably makes little or no difference to death, remission, relapse, severe adverse events, serious infections, or severe adverse events. Kidney function and dialysis were not reported. A single study reported no difference in the number of deaths, need for dialysis, or adverse events between mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) and CPA. Remission was reported to improve with MMF however more patients relapsed. A lower dose of steroids was probably as effective as high dose and may be safer, causing fewer infections; kidney function and relapse were not reported. There was little of no difference in death or remission between six and 12 pulses of CPA. There is low certainty evidence that there were less relapses with 12 pulses (2 studies: RR 1.57, 95% CI 0.96 to 2.56; I² = 0%), but more infections (2 studies: RR 0.79, 95% CI 0.36 to 1.72; I² = 45%). One study reported severe adverse events were less in patients receiving six compared to 12 pulses of CPA. Kidney function and dialysis were not reported. There is limited evidence from single studies about the effectiveness of intravenous immunoglobulin, avacopan, methotrexate, immunoadsorption, lymphocytapheresis, or etanercept. Maintenance therapy: Azathioprine (AZA) has equivalent efficacy as a maintenance agent to CPA with fewer episodes of leucopenia. MMF resulted in a higher relapse rate when tested against azathioprine in remission maintenance. Rituximab is an effective remission induction and maintenance agent. Oral co-trimoxazole did not reduce relapses in granulomatosis with polyangiitis. There were fewer relapses but more serious adverse events with leflunomide compared to methotrexate. There is limited evidence from single studies about the effectiveness of methotrexate versus CPA or AZA, cyclosporin versus CPA, extended versus standard AZA, and belimumab.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

Plasma exchange was effective in patients with severe AKI secondary to vasculitis. Pulse cyclophosphamide may result in an increased risk of relapse when compared to continuous oral use but a reduced total dose. Whilst CPA is standard induction treatment, rituximab and MMF were also effective. AZA, methotrexate and leflunomide were effective as maintenance therapy. Further studies are required to more clearly delineate the appropriate place of newer agents within an evidence-based therapeutic strategy.

Remission maintenance in ANCA-associated vasculitis: does one size fit all?

Introduction: The majority of the patients with anti-neutrophil cytoplasmic autoantibody (ANCA) associated vasculitis (AAV) achieve remission with effective induction therapy. Therefore, prevention of relapses and avoiding long-term damage and treatment-related toxicity are major challenges.Areas covered: This review provides an update on maintenance therapy in AAV, emphasizing the available treatment options for granulomatosis with polyangiitis (GPA) and microscopic polyangiitis (MPA). Among the spectrum of all patients with AAV, those at higher risk of relapse have recently been identified. Clinical trials have yielded robust results about various options for maintenance of remission including common disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (DMARDs, i.e. azathioprine, methotrexate, and mycophenolate mofetil) and rituximab (RTX). However, outcomes of these studies are not easy to compare.Expert opinion: Regardless of the treatment used, patients presenting with an anti-proteinase-3 ANCA, relapsing GPA have a substantially higher risk of relapse compared to patients with newly diagnosed MPA or positive anti-myeloperoxidase ANCA. While the efficacy of common DMARDs for remission maintenance is heterogeneous, the role of RTX seems particularly promising for the high-risk patients, although the most appropriate dose and timing of retreatment with RTX remain under controversial. Low-dose glucocorticoid use for remission maintenance versus complete discontinuation also remains under investigation.

[Current treatment of eosinophilic granulomatosis with polyangiitis (Churg-Strauss syndrome)]

For the treatment of eosinophilic granulomatosis with polyangiitis (EGPA) much less data are available when compared to the other anti-neutrophil cytoplasmic antibody (ANCA)-associated vasculitides (AAV). At the same time EGPA also differs in many aspects from AAVs. Treatment is guided by the German and international guidelines. An adapted induction therapy is chosen depending on the disease activity, manifestations and factors determining the prognosis. For patients without negative prognostic factors glucocorticoids alone may be sufficient. A medium potent immunosuppressive agent may be added in order to economize on steroids. For patients with severe organ manifestations and adverse prognostic factors, a highly potent immunosuppression usually with cyclophosphamide, is necessary. In cases of remission a maintenance therapy is recommended in the same way as for other AAVs. Recently, a biological, the IL-5 antibody mepolizumab has also become available, although its precise role still has to be established.

Treatment of Antineutrophil Cytoplasmic Antibody-Associated Vasculitis: Is There Still a Role for Cyclophosphamide?

Antineutrophil cytoplasmic antibody (ANCA)-associated vasculitis (AAV) is a group of systemic necrotizing vasculitides that includes granulomatosis with polyangiitis, microscopic polyangiitis, and eosinophilic granulomatosis with polyangiitis. Treatment of these conditions has improved during the past 2 decades with better understanding of these conditions and availability of newer agents. Cyclophosphamide (CYC) was the first drug demonstrated to afford successful treatment and improvement in AAV. With the emergence of newer agents with more favorable safety profiles, CYC is no longer the cornerstone of management of AAV. This article reviews existing data for treatment and the current role of CYC in the management of AAV.

Hypereosinophilic syndrome: approach to treatment in the era of precision medicine

Hypereosinophilic syndromes (HESs) are a heterogeneous group of rare disorders characterized by peripheral eosinophilia and eosinophilic end organ complications. Conventional therapies, including glucocorticoids and cytotoxic and immunomodulatory agents, have variable efficacy and significant toxicity. Although the recent development of agents that target eosinophils, including tyrosine kinase inhibitors and monoclonal antibodies, provides the possibility of more effective, less toxic approaches to treatment of HES, there are little available data to guide their use in these conditions. In the following review, the controversies regarding the definition and classification of HES will be discussed, and a pragmatic approach to treatment based on clinically defined HES variants will be presented. An illustrative case will be used to highlight the complexities of treatment selection in HES patients.

Antineutrophil cytoplasmic antibody-associated vasculitis, update on molecular pathogenesis, diagnosis, and treatment

Circulating antineutrophil cytoplasmic antibodies (ANCAs) are the central pathogenic mechanism for a group of systemic and renal syndromes called the ANCA-associated vasculitis (AAV). The nomenclature has changed from eponymous labeling to granulomatosis with polyangiitis, eosinophilic granulomatosis with polyangiitis, and microscopic polyangiitis. These syndromes predominantly affect the pulmonary and renal systems. We also review the molecular pathology behind ANCAs and associated antigens and infections. Various clinical presentations, the multiple target organs affected, and diagnostic challenges involved in identifying these diseases are discussed. Treatment updates are also provided with regard to new studies and the now standard use of anti-CD-20 monoclonal antibodies as first-line therapy in all but the most aggressive presentations of this disease. Maintenance regimens and monitoring strategies for relapse of vasculitis and associated systemic complications are discussed.