SAGA mediates transcription from the TATA-like element independently of Taf1p/TFIID but dependent on core promoter structures in Saccharomyces cerevisiae

Regulation of eukaryotic transcription initiation in response to cellular stress

Transcription initiation is a vital step in the regulation of eukaryotic gene expression. It can be dysregulated in response to various cellular stressors which is associated with numerous human diseases including cancer. Transcription initiation is facilitated via many gene-specific trans-regulatory elements such as transcription factors, activators, and coactivators through their interactions with transcription pre-initiation complex (PIC). These trans-regulatory elements can uniquely facilitate PIC formation (hence, transcription initiation) in response to cellular nutrient stress. Cellular nutrient stress also regulates the activity of other pathways such as target of rapamycin (TOR) pathway. TOR pathway exhibits distinct regulatory mechanisms of transcriptional activation in response to stress. Like TOR pathway, the cell cycle regulatory pathway is also found to be linked to transcriptional regulation in response to cellular stress. Several transcription factors such as p53, C/EBP Homologous Protein (CHOP), activating transcription factor 6 (ATF6α), E2F, transforming growth factor (TGF)-β, Adenomatous polyposis coli (APC), SMAD, and MYC have been implicated in regulation of transcription of target genes involved in cell cycle progression, apoptosis, and DNA damage repair pathways. Additionally, cellular metabolic and oxidative stressors have been found to regulate the activity of long non-coding RNAs (lncRNA). LncRNA regulates transcription by upregulating or downregulating the transcription regulatory proteins involved in metabolic and cell signaling pathways. Numerous human diseases, triggered by chronic cellular stressors, are associated with abnormal regulation of transcription. Hence, understanding these mechanisms would help unravel the molecular regulatory insights with potential therapeutic interventions. Therefore, here we emphasize the recent advances of regulation of eukaryotic transcription initiation in response to cellular stress.

On the Role of TATA Boxes and TATA-Binding Protein in Arabidopsis thaliana

For transcription initiation by RNA polymerase II (Pol II), all eukaryotes require assembly of basal transcription machinery on the core promoter, a region located approximately in the locus spanning a transcription start site (-50; +50 bp). Although Pol II is a complex multi-subunit enzyme conserved among all eukaryotes, it cannot initiate transcription without the participation of many other proteins. Transcription initiation on TATA-containing promoters requires the assembly of the preinitiation complex; this process is triggered by an interaction of TATA-binding protein (TBP, a component of the general transcription factor TFIID (transcription factor II D)) with a TATA box. The interaction of TBP with various TATA boxes in plants, in particular Arabidopsis thaliana, has hardly been investigated, except for a few early studies that addressed the role of a TATA box and substitutions in it in plant transcription systems. This is despite the fact that the interaction of TBP with TATA boxes and their variants can be used to regulate transcription. In this review, we examine the roles of some general transcription factors in the assembly of the basal transcription complex, as well as functions of TATA boxes of the model plant A. thaliana. We review examples showing not only the involvement of TATA boxes in the initiation of transcription machinery assembly but also their indirect participation in plant adaptation to environmental conditions in responses to light and other phenomena. Examples of an influence of the expression levels of A. thaliana TBP1 and TBP2 on morphological traits of the plants are also examined. We summarize available functional data on these two early players that trigger the assembly of transcription machinery. This information will deepen the understanding of the mechanisms underlying transcription by Pol II in plants and will help to utilize the functions of the interaction of TBP with TATA boxes in practice.

TFIID dependency of steady-state mRNA transcription altered epigenetically by simultaneous functional loss of Taf1 and Spt3 is Hsp104-dependent

In Saccharomyces cerevisiae, class II gene promoters have been divided into two subclasses, TFIID- and SAGA-dominated promoters or TFIID-dependent and coactivator-redundant promoters, depending on the experimental methods used to measure mRNA levels. A prior study demonstrated that Spt3, a TBP-delivering subunit of SAGA, functionally regulates the PGK1 promoter via two mechanisms: by stimulating TATA box-dependent transcriptional activity and conferring Taf1/TFIID independence. However, only the former could be restored by plasmid-borne SPT3. In the present study, we sought to determine why ectopically expressed SPT3 is unable to restore Taf1/TFIID independence to the PGK1 promoter, identifying that this function was dependent on the construction protocol for the SPT3 taf1 strain. Specifically, simultaneous functional loss of Spt3 and Taf1 during strain construction was a prerequisite to render the PGK1 promoter Taf1/TFIID-dependent in this strain. Intriguingly, genetic approaches revealed that an as-yet unidentified trans-acting factor reprogrammed the transcriptional mode of the PGK1 promoter from the Taf1/TFIID-independent state to the Taf1/TFIID-dependent state. This factor was generated in the haploid SPT3 taf1 strain in an Hsp104-dependent manner and inherited meiotically in a non-Mendelian fashion. Furthermore, RNA-seq analyses demonstrated that this factor likely affects the transcription mode of not only the PGK1 promoter, but also of many other class II gene promoters. Collectively, these findings suggest that a prion or biomolecular condensate is generated in a Hsp104-dependent manner upon simultaneous functional loss of TFIID and SAGA, and could alter the roles of these transcription complexes on a wide variety of class II gene promoters without altering their primary sequences. Therefore, these findings could provide the first evidence that TFIID dependence of class II gene transcription can be altered epigenetically, at least in Saccharomyces cerevisiae.

Highly diversified core promoters in the human genome and their effects on gene expression and disease predisposition

Background

Core promoter controls transcription initiation. However, little is known for core promoter diversity in the human genome and its relationship with diseases. We hypothesized that as a functional important component in the genome, the core promoter in the human genome could be under evolutionary selection, as reflected by its highly diversification in order to adjust gene expression for better adaptation to the different environment.

Results

Applying the “Exome-based Variant Detection in Core-promoters” method, we analyzed human core-promoter diversity by using the 2682 exome data sets of 25 worldwide human populations sequenced by the 1000 Genome Project. Collectively, we identified 31,996 variants in the core promoter region (− 100 to + 100) of 12,509 human genes (https://dbhcpd.fhs.um.edu.mo). Analyzing the rich variation data identified highly ethnic-specific patterns of core promoter variation between different ethnic populations, the genes with highly variable core promoters, the motifs affected by the variants, and their involved functional pathways. eQTL test revealed that 12% of core promoter variants can significantly alter gene expression level. Comparison with GWAS data we located 163 variants as the GWAS identified traits associated with multiple diseases, half of these variants can alter gene expression.

Conclusion

Data from our study reals the highly diversified nature of core promoter in the human genome, and highlights that core promoter variation could play important roles not only in gene expression regulation but also in disease predisposition.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12864-020-07222-5.

The Regulatory Properties of the Ccr4-Not Complex

The mammalian Ccr4–Not complex, carbon catabolite repression 4 (Ccr4)-negative on TATA-less (Not), is a large, highly conserved, multifunctional assembly of proteins that acts at different cellular levels to regulate gene expression. In the nucleus, it is involved in the regulation of the cell cycle, chromatin modification, activation and inhibition of transcription initiation, control of transcription elongation, RNA export, nuclear RNA surveillance, and DNA damage repair. In the cytoplasm, the Ccr4–Not complex plays a central role in mRNA decay and affects protein quality control. Most of our original knowledge of the Ccr4–Not complex is derived, primarily, from studies in yeast. More recent studies have shown that the mammalian complex has a comparable structure and similar properties. In this review, we summarize the evidence for the multiple roles of both the yeast and mammalian Ccr4–Not complexes, highlighting their similarities.

Embryonic tissue differentiation is characterized by transitions in cell cycle dynamic-associated core promoter regulation

The core-promoter, a stretch of DNA surrounding the transcription start site (TSS), is a major integration-point for regulatory-signals controlling gene-transcription. Cellular differentiation is marked by divergence in transcriptional repertoire and cell-cycling behaviour between cells of different fates. The role promoter-associated gene-regulatory-networks play in development-associated transitions in cell-cycle-dynamics is poorly understood. This study demonstrates in a vertebrate embryo, how core-promoter variations define transcriptional output in cells transitioning from a proliferative to cell-lineage specifying phenotype. Assessment of cell proliferation across zebrafish embryo segmentation, using the FUCCI transgenic cell-cycle-phase marker, revealed a spatial and lineage-specific separation in cell-cycling behaviour. To investigate the role differential promoter usage plays in this process, cap-analysis-of-gene-expression (CAGE) was performed on cells segregated by cycling dynamics. This analysis revealed a dramatic increase in tissue-specific gene expression, concurrent with slowed cycling behaviour. We revealed a distinct sharpening in TSS utilization in genes upregulated in slowly cycling, differentiating tissues, associated with enhanced utilization of the TATA-box, in addition to Sp1 binding-sites. In contrast, genes upregulated in rapidly cycling cells carry broad distribution of TSS utilization, coupled with enrichment for the CCAAT-box. These promoter features appear to correspond to cell-cycle-dynamic rather than tissue/cell-lineage origin. Moreover, we observed genes with cell-cycle-dynamic-associated transitioning in TSS distribution and differential utilization of alternative promoters. These results demonstrate the regulatory role of core-promoters in cell-cycle-dependent transcription regulation, during embryo-development.

So close, no matter how far: multiple paths connecting transcription to mRNA translation in eukaryotes

Transcription of DNA into mRNA and translation of mRNA into proteins are two major processes underlying gene expression. Due to the distinct molecular mechanisms, timings, and locales of action, these processes are mainly considered to be independent. During the last two decades, however, multiple factors and elements were shown to coordinate transcription and translation, suggesting an intricate level of synchronization. This review discusses the molecular mechanisms that impact both processes in eukaryotic cells of different origins. The emerging global picture suggests evolutionarily conserved regulation and coordination between transcription and mRNA translation, indicating the importance of this phenomenon for the fine-tuning of gene expression and the adjustment to constantly changing conditions.