Urgent endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography is not superior to early ERCP in acute biliary pancreatitis with biliary obstruction without cholangitis

Early Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography in Gallstone Pancreatitis Is Safe: Results From a Large Single-Center Retrospective Study

OBJECTIVES

There is concern that performing early endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) in the setting of gallstone pancreatitis (GSP) with choledocholithiasis can worsen underlying pancreatitis. This study was designed to assess outcomes of early versus delayed ERCP in patients with GSP with choledocholithiasis in the absence of cholangitis.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

In this single-center retrospective study, we identified 124 patients who underwent ERCP for choledocholithiasis in the setting of GSP without cholangitis between 2012 and 2022. Timing of ERCP was categorized as early (<48 hours after time of diagnosis) versus delayed (>48 hours). Data on patient demographics, complications, length of stay (LOS), and mortality were collected.

RESULTS

Cannulation success rates were similar for early and delayed ERCP (97% vs 100%). The adverse event rate for early ERCP was 15% compared to 29% for delayed ERCP. LOS for patients with predicted mild pancreatitis was shorter for early versus delayed ERCP (4.2 vs 7.1 days, P = 0.007). There were no deaths in either group.

CONCLUSIONS

There was a trend toward fewer adverse events and there was a shorter LOS among patients with GSP with choledocholithiasis undergoing early versus delayed ERCP. Early ERCP should be considered, particularly in patients with predicted mild pancreatitis.

Increased ERCP-related adverse event from premature urgent ERCP following symptom onset in acute biliary pancreatitis with cholangitis

Acute biliary pancreatitis (ABP) with cholangitis requires endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) within 24 h to resolve ductal obstruction. However, this recommendation is based on the timing of emergency room (ER) visits. We wanted to determine the optimal timing of ERCP for ABP based on the timing of symptom onset, not the timing of the ER visit. We retrospectively reviewed 162 patients with ABP with cholangitis who underwent urgent ERCP (within 24 h of ER admission). Area under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve (AUC) was analyzed to determine differences in complication rates according to time from symptom onset. A difference in ERCP-related adverse events (AEs) was identified, and Youden's J statistic was used to determine a cutoff time from symptom onset (18 h). We compared mortality and complications based on this cutoff. Based on time to symptom onset, significantly higher rates of aspiration pneumonia (odds ratio [OR] 4.00, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.15-13.92, P = 0.021) and post-ERCP hypotension (OR 11.9, 95% CI 1.39-101.33, P = 0.005) were observed in the ≤ 18-h group than in the > 18-h group. The study found that patients who underwent ERCP within 18 h of symptom onset is associated with an increased risk of ERCP-related AEs.

Factors associated with acute pancreatitis in patients with impacted duodenal papillary stones: a retrospective cohort study

OBJECTIVE

Impaction of a stone at the duodenal papilla can obstruct biliopancreatic outflow and thereby lead to acute pancreatitis. But not all patients with an impacted papillary stone (IPS) had the clinical features of pancreatitis. This study aimed to identify factors associated with acute pancreatitis in patients with IPS.

METHODS

We retrospectively analyzed patients with IPS who underwent endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) at Tianjin Nankai Hospital. Clinical factors were compared between patients with/without acute pancreatitis before ERCP. Factors associated with acute pancreatitis were identified by univariable and multivariable binary logistic regression.

RESULTS

The final analysis included 174 patients with acute pancreatitis (pancreatitis group, PG) and 130 patients without acute pancreatitis (non-pancreatitis group, NPG). Preoperative incidences of jaundice (85.6 vs. 72.3%), acute cholangitis (54.6 vs. 33.8%), and hyperlipidemia (39.1 vs. 22.3%) were higher in the PG than in the NPG (p < .05). High tension in the duodenal papilla (83.3 vs. 71.5%), circular papillary orifice (82.8 vs. 70.0%), and distal stone impaction (90.8 vs. 82.3%) were more common in the PG than in the NPG (p < .05), whereas stone diameter and common bile duct diameter did not differ significantly between groups. Multivariable logistic regression revealed that jaundice, acute cholangitis, hyperlipidemia, and dot/circular papillary orifice were independently associated with acute pancreatitis (p < .05).

CONCLUSIONS

Jaundice, acute cholangitis, and hyperlipidemia are independent risk factors for acute pancreatitis in patients with IPS. Prompt ERCP in patients with these features might reduce acute pancreatitis risk. Dot/circular papillary orifice may be an anatomical factor of acute pancreatitis, which needs more evidence.

Emergency Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography Did Not Increase the Incidence of Postprocedural Pancreatitis Compared With Elective Cases: A Prospective Multicenter Observational Study

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to identify the incidence of and risk factors for post-endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography pancreatitis (PEP) after emergency endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP).

METHODS

We performed a prospective multicenter observational study of 3914 patients who underwent ERCP. We compared the incidence of PEP after emergency and elective ERCP.

RESULTS

A total of 3410 patients were enrolled in this study. Post-ERCP pancreatitis occurred in 44 of 800 patients (5.5%) and in 190 of 2418 patients (7.9%) in the emergency and elective groups, respectively. No significant difference was noted between the groups (odds ratio [OR], 0.73; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.52-1.03; P = 0.07). Multivariate analysis showed that the following factors increased the risk for PEP after emergency ERCP: contrast medium injection into the pancreatic duct (OR, 2.56; 95% CI, 1.30-5.03; P = 0.005), >4 cannulation attempts (OR, 5.72; 95% CI, 2.61-12.50; P < 0.001), and endoscopic papillary balloon dilatation (OR, 9.24; 95% CI, 2.13-40.10; P < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

No significant difference was noted in the incidence of PEP in patients after emergency and elective ERCP. We may prevent PEP even after emergency ERCP by avoiding contrast injection into the pancreatic duct, multiple cannulation attempts, and endoscopic papillary balloon dilatation.

Choledochoduodenostomy Versus Hepaticogastrostomy in Endoscopic Ultrasound-guided Drainage for Malignant Biliary Obstruction: A Meta-analysis and Systematic Review

OBJECTIVES

This study aimed to estimate the safety and efficacy of endoscopic ultrasound-guided choledochoduodenostomy (EUS-CDS) and endoscopic ultrasound-guided hepaticogastrostomy (EUS-HGS) for malignant biliary obstruction.

METHODS

We conducted a literature search using PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, and ClinicalTrials.gov. Studies that compared EUS-CDS and EUS-HGS were included in this study.

RESULTS

Thirteen studies were eligible for inclusion. The technical [odds ratio (OR): 0.95; 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.51-1.74) and clinical (OR: 1.13; 95%CI: 0.66-1.94) success rates of EUS-CDS were comparable to those of EUS-HGS. However, EUS-CDS had less reintervention (OR: 0.31; 95%CI: 0.16-0.63) and stent obstruction (OR: 0.48; 95%CI: 0.21-0.94) than EUS-HGS. Both groups had similar adverse events (OR: 1.00; 95%CI: 0.70-1.43) and overall survival (hazard ratio: 1.07; 95%CI: 0.58-1.97).

CONCLUSIONS

EUS-CDS and EUS-HGS have comparable technical and clinical success rates, adverse events, and overall survival. However, EUS-CDS has less reintervention and stent obstruction.

Effectiveness of supraglottic ventilation by transtracheal catheter for painless ERCP

PURPOSE

This study aimed to investigate the effect of supraglottic ventilation via transtracheal catheter in painless endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP).

METHODS

Sixty patients with painless ERCP who were treated in our hospital were enrolled as the study subjects and divided into a study group (n=30) and a control group (n=30) according to the method of ventilation during the operation. The control group received ventilation via modified laryngeal mask, while the study group received supraglottic ventilation through a transtracheal tube. The mean arterial pressure (MAP), heart rate (HR), oxygen saturation (SpO₂), and End-tidal CO₂ (EtCO₂) at multiple time points after admission (T0), after induction of anesthesia (T1), immediately after catheter placement (T2), immediately after operation (T3), and at the time of resuscitation (T4) were compared between the two groups. The incidence of various adverse events in the perioperative period was also compared.

RESULTS

The two groups showed significant fluctuations in intraoperative hemodynamic parameters. However, the changes in MAP, SpO₂ and ETCO₂ of the study group were more stable, and better than those of the control group at the T2 and T3 (P<0.05). The intubation time, operation time and recovery time of patients in the study group were significantly lower than those in the control group (P<0.05). The total incidence of adverse events in the study group was significantly lower than that in the control group (P<0.05).

CONCLUSION

It is highly feasible to apply supraglottic ventilation with transvalvular catheter in painless ERCP, which can significantly stabilize the perioperative hemodynamic parameters, accelerate recovery and also help decrease the rate of postoperative complications.

Safety of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) in patients aged 85 years and older: A single center experience

Objective: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) in elderly patients (≥85 years old).

Material and Methods: Patients who underwent ERCP for any reason within 12 months were evaluated. Patients undergoing ERCP were classified as the elderly group aged 85 years and older or the controls under the age of 85 years.

Results: A total of 1225 patients, 504 males and 721 females, were included in the study. Length of hospital stay, the number of patients in whom pre- cut sphincterotomy was performed in ERCP, and mortality rate showed similar characteristics compared to the control group in patients with advanced age (≥85 years old). Except for pancreatitis, there was no significant difference between the groups in terms of complications related to the procedure. Post ERCP pancreatitis was observed significantly less in the elderly group (p= 0.042). Pre-cut sphincterotomy was required in a total of 191 (15.5%) patients. In patients who underwent pre-cut sphincterotomy and patients with cholangitis, post ERCP complication rates were not significant between the groups.

Conclusion: ERCP is a safe procedure for older patients (≥85 years old) as well as young patients.

Improving the Standard of Care for All-A Practical Guide to Developing a Center of Excellence

Pancreatic surgery is one of the more challenging procedures performed by surgeons. The operations are technically complex and have historically been accompanied by a substantial risk for mortality and postoperative complications. Other pancreatic pathologies require advanced therapeutic procedures that are highly endoscopist-dependent, requiring specific, knowledge-based training for optimal outcomes. An increase in diagnosed pancreatic pathologies every year reinforces a critical need for experienced surgeons, gastroenterologists/endoscopists, hospitals, and support personnel in the management of complex pancreatic cases and thus, well-designed Centers of Excellence (CoE). In this paper, we outline the framework for a Pancreas CoE across three developmental domains: (1) establishing the foundation; (2) formalizing the program; (3) solidifying the CoE status. This framework can likely be translated to any disease or procedure-specific service-line and facilitate the development of a successful CoE.

Timing of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography in acute biliary pancreatitis without cholangitis: a nationwide inpatient cohort study

Background

The timing of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) in patients with acute biliary pancreatitis without cholangitis is unclear. We accessed a national database to analyze the outcomes of urgent (<24 h) and early (24-72 h) ERCP in this cohort.

Methods

The cohort was extracted from the Nationwide Inpatient Sample database. Hospital ERCP volumes were generated using unique hospital identifiers. Multivariate regression modeling was used to analyze the predictors of urgent vs. early ERCP use, and to determine various outcome variables between the 2 cohorts.

Results

Overall, 105,433 admissions were evaluated. There was a significant rise in urgent ERCP performed over the study period. Older patients, males, patients with comorbidities, African American and Hispanic patient populations were less likely to receive urgent ERCP. High ERCP volume hospitals, teaching hospitals, and hospitals in the Midwest and West were more likely to perform urgent ERCP. There were no differences in mortality rates or complication rates between the 2 cohorts. However, there were significant differences in length of stay and healthcare cost analysis.

Conclusions

The increasing use of urgent ERCP did not result in a clinically significant benefit in terms of mortality, length of stay, or healthcare cost analysis. The use of urgent ERCP is also not uniform across various demographic and hospital cohorts. Urgent ERCP may be over-utilized, and it may be reasonable to perform ERCP in this patient population based on the physician’s suspicion about the severity of disease.

Outcomes of delayed endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography in patients with acute biliary pancreatitis with cholangitis

OBJECTIVE

The recommended treatment for acute biliary pancreatitis(ABP) with cholangitis is urgent endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography(ERCP). However, tight schedules in the endoscopy room mean that urgent ERCP may not always be performed. This study aimed to compare the outcomes of early (≤72 h) and delayed(>72 h) ERCP in patients with ABP with cholangitis.

METHODS

Ninety-five patients diagnosed with ABP with cholangitis who underwent ERCP between May 2012 and April 2018 were retrospectively reviewed.

RESULTS

Sixty-seven patients(70.5%) were classified in the early ERCP and 28(29.5%) in the delayed ERCP groups. There was no significant difference in pancreatitis severity between the groups. Total bilirubin was higher in the early compared with the late ERCP group (5.7 ± 5.2 versus 3.5 ± 2.3 mg/dL, p = 0.03). Fewer patients in the early group had end-stage renal disease (0 versus 3, p = 0.006) and relatively fewer patients in the early group took aspirin (15(22.4%) versus 12(42.9%), p = 0.04). There were no significant differences between the early and delayed ERCP groups in terms of mortality (2(3.0%) versus 0), disease-related complications(11 (16.4%) versus 5(17.9%), p = 0.86), or ERCP-related complications(5(7.5%) versus 3(10.7%), p = 0.60). The total length of stay(LoS) was shorter in the early group(6.3 ± 4.4 versus 9.8 ± 6.1 days, p = 0.002). The rate of complete stone removal was lower in the early compared with the delayed ERCP group(32/42(76.2%) versus 18/18(100%), p = 0.02).

CONCLUSION

Delayed ERCP can be performed in selected patients with ABP with cholangitis, with similar complication rates but longer LoS compared with early ERCP.

Acute Pancreatitis Task Force on Quality: Development of Quality Indicators for Acute Pancreatitis Management

INTRODUCTION

Detailed recommendations and guidelines for acute pancreatitis (AP) management currently exist. However, quality indicators (QIs) are required to measure performance in health care. The goal of the Acute Pancreatitis Task Force on Quality was to formally develop QIs for the management of patients with known or suspected AP using a modified version of the RAND/UCLA Appropriateness Methodology.

METHODS

A multidisciplinary expert panel composed of physicians (gastroenterologists, hospitalists, and surgeons) who are acknowledged leaders in their specialties and who represent geographic and practice setting diversity was convened. A literature review was conducted, and a list of proposed QIs was developed. In 3 rounds, panelists reviewed literature, modified QIs, and rated them on the basis of scientific evidence, bias, interpretability, validity, necessity, and proposed performance targets.

RESULTS

Supporting literature and a list of 71 proposed QIs across 10 AP domains (Diagnosis, Etiology, Initial Assessment and Risk Stratification, etc.) were sent to the expert panel to review and independently rate in round 1 (95% of panelists participated). Based on a round 2 face-to-face discussion of QIs (75% participation), 41 QIs were classified as valid. During round 3 (90% participation), panelists rated the 41 valid QIs for necessity and proposed performance thresholds. The final classification determined that 40 QIs were both valid and necessary.

DISCUSSION

Hospitals and providers managing patients with known or suspected AP should ensure that patients receive high-quality care and desired outcomes according to current evidence-based best practices. This physician-led initiative formally developed 40 QIs and performance threshold targets for AP management. Validated QIs provide a dependable quantitative framework for health systems to monitor the quality of care provided to patients with known or suspected AP.

Recent advances in understanding and managing acute pancreatitis

This review highlights advances made in recent years in the diagnosis and management of acute pancreatitis (AP). We focus on epidemiological, clinical, and management aspects of AP. Additionally, we discuss the role of using risk stratification tools to guide clinical decision making. The majority of patients suffer from mild AP, and only a subset develop moderately severe AP, defined as a pancreatic local complication, or severe AP, defined as persistent organ failure. In mild AP, management typically involves diagnostic evaluation and supportive care resulting usually in a short hospital length of stay (LOS). In severe AP, a multidisciplinary approach is warranted to minimize morbidity and mortality over the course of a protracted hospital LOS. Based on evidence from guideline recommendations, we discuss five treatment interventions, including intravenous fluid resuscitation, feeding, prophylactic antibiotics, probiotics, and timing of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) in acute biliary pancreatitis. This review also highlights the importance of preventive interventions to reduce hospital readmission or prevent pancreatitis, including alcohol and smoking cessation, same-admission cholecystectomy for acute biliary pancreatitis, and chemoprevention and fluid administration for post-ERCP pancreatitis. Our review aims to consolidate guideline recommendations and high-quality studies published in recent years to guide the management of AP and highlight areas in need of research.

Recent advances in understanding and managing acute pancreatitis

This review highlights advances made in recent years in the diagnosis and management of acute pancreatitis (AP). We focus on epidemiological, clinical, and management aspects of AP. Additionally, we discuss the role of using risk stratification tools to guide clinical decision making. The majority of patients suffer from mild AP, and only a subset develop moderately severe AP, defined as a pancreatic local complication, or severe AP, defined as persistent organ failure. In mild AP, management typically involves diagnostic evaluation and supportive care resulting usually in a short hospital length of stay (LOS). In severe AP, a multidisciplinary approach is warranted to minimize morbidity and mortality over the course of a protracted hospital LOS. Based on evidence from guideline recommendations, we discuss five treatment interventions, including intravenous fluid resuscitation, feeding, prophylactic antibiotics, probiotics, and timing of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) in acute biliary pancreatitis. This review also highlights the importance of preventive interventions to reduce hospital readmission or prevent pancreatitis, including alcohol and smoking cessation, same-admission cholecystectomy for acute biliary pancreatitis, and chemoprevention and fluid administration for post-ERCP pancreatitis. Our review aims to consolidate guideline recommendations and high-quality studies published in recent years to guide the management of AP and highlight areas in need of research.