1
|
Marco R, Capobianco D, Fernando DG, Evangelista L. Incidental Detection of Sarcomatoid Lung Cancer by [ 18F] Choline Positron Emission Tomography/Computed Tomography. Mol Imaging Radionucl Ther 2023; 32:250-251. [PMID: 37870386 PMCID: PMC10600544 DOI: 10.4274/mirt.galenos.2023.81594] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/06/2023] [Accepted: 03/05/2023] [Indexed: 10/24/2023] Open
Abstract
A 79-year-old man treated for prostate cancer (PCa) in 2018 with concurrent hormone therapy and radical radiotherapy (RT) was given metastasis-directed RT because of skeletal progression of PCa in 2021. On [18F]-choline positron emission tomography/computed tomography (CT) for biochemical recurrence (prostate-specific antigen level: 4.96 ng/mL), he showed significant uptake in multiple skeletal lesions and focal uptake in a left lung nodule. CT-guided biopsy revealed a sarcomatoid lung carcinoma. This case confirms that histopathological evaluation is mandatory in the event of significant radiolabeled choline uptake in a single lung nodule.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rensi Marco
- Azienda Sanitaria Universitaria Integrata, Nuclear Medicine Unit, Udine, Italy
| | - Decio Capobianco
- Azienda Sanitaria Universitaria Integrata, Nuclear Medicine Unit, Udine, Italy
| | | | - Laura Evangelista
- University of Padua, Department of Medicine DIMED, Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging Unit, Padua, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Turkbey B, Oto A, Allen BC, Akin O, Alexander LF, Ari M, Froemming AT, Fulgham PF, Gettle LM, Maranchie JK, Rosenthal SA, Schieda N, Schuster DM, Venkatesan AM, Lockhart ME. ACR Appropriateness Criteria® Post-Treatment Follow-up of Prostate Cancer: 2022 Update. J Am Coll Radiol 2023; 20:S164-S186. [PMID: 37236741 DOI: 10.1016/j.jacr.2023.02.012] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/21/2023] [Accepted: 02/27/2023] [Indexed: 05/28/2023]
Abstract
Prostate cancer has a wide spectrum ranging between low-grade localized disease and castrate-resistant metastatic disease. Although whole gland and systematic therapies result in cure in the majority of patients, recurrent and metastatic prostate cancer can still occur. Imaging approaches including anatomic, functional, and molecular modalities are continuously expanding. Currently, recurrent and metastatic prostate cancer is grouped in three major categories: 1) Clinical concern for residual or recurrent disease after radical prostatectomy, 2) Clinical concern for residual or recurrent disease after nonsurgical local and pelvic treatments, and 3) Metastatic prostate cancer treated by systemic therapy (androgen deprivation therapy, chemotherapy, immunotherapy). This document is a review of the current literature regarding imaging in these settings and the resulting recommendations for imaging. The American College of Radiology Appropriateness Criteria are evidence-based guidelines for specific clinical conditions that are reviewed annually by a multidisciplinary expert panel. The guideline development and revision include an extensive analysis of current medical literature from peer reviewed journals and the application of well-established methodologies (RAND/UCLA Appropriateness Method and Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation or GRADE) to rate the appropriateness of imaging and treatment procedures for specific clinical scenarios. In those instances where evidence is lacking or equivocal, expert opinion may supplement the available evidence to recommend imaging or treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Baris Turkbey
- National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland.
| | - Aytekin Oto
- Panel Chair, University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois
| | - Brian C Allen
- Panel Vice-Chair, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina
| | - Oguz Akin
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | | | - Mim Ari
- The University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois, Primary care physician
| | | | - Pat F Fulgham
- Urology Clinics of North Texas, Dallas, Texas; American Urological Association
| | | | | | - Seth A Rosenthal
- Sutter Medical Group, Sacramento, California; Commission on Radiation Oncology
| | - Nicola Schieda
- Ottawa Hospital Research Institute and the Department of Radiology, The University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
| | - David M Schuster
- Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia; Commission on Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging
| | | | - Mark E Lockhart
- Specialty Chair, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Kim DY, Lee WW, Song YS, Hong SK, Byun SS, Kim JS. Detection of Recurrence Sites using 18F-fluorocholine PET/CT in Prostate Cancer Patients with PSA failure. Prostate Int 2022. [DOI: 10.1016/j.prnil.2022.11.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
|
4
|
Lasserre M, Sargos P, Barret E, Beauval JB, Brureau L, Créhange G, Dariane C, Fiard G, Fromont G, Mathieu R, Renard-Penna R, Roubaud G, Ruffion A, Rouprêt M, Ploussard G, Gauthé M. Narrative review of PET/CT performances at biochemical recurrence in prostate cancer after radical prostatectomy and impact on patient disease management: Revue narrative à propos des performances de la TEP/TDM en cas de récidive biochimique après prostatectomie radicale dans le cancer de la prostate et impact sur la prise en charge des patients. Prog Urol 2022; 32:6S33-6S42. [PMID: 36719645 DOI: 10.1016/s1166-7087(22)00173-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/03/2023]
Abstract
Patients treated by radical prostatectomy (RP) for localized prostate cancer (PCa) may experience biochemical recurrence (BCR) in approximately 30% of cases. Recently, advances in imaging modalities and in particular Positron-Emission Tomography with computed tomography (PET/CT) imaging allow for better detection and characterization of lesions outside the prostatic bed at recurrence. Thus, treatment at BCR can be significantly improved by a tailored strategy based on new generation imaging. A more precise and accurate staging of the disease at recurrence paves the way to more appropriate treatment, potentially translating into better survival outcomes of these patients. This review therefore highlights the interest of PET/CT at the time of BCR, its superiority over standard imaging in terms of staging, and its impact on guiding the different therapeutic possibilities depending on the site, number, and volumes of recurrence. Indeed, we will discuss below about different strategies and their indications: salvage radiotherapy of the prostate bed, systemic therapies, stereotactic body radiotherapy and others therapeutical strategies. The various innovative approaches based on PET/CT implementation are partly underway within protocol trials to prove their benefits on clinically meaningful endpoints. © 2022 Elsevier Masson SAS. All rights reserved.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- M Lasserre
- Department of Medical oncology, Institut Bergonié, Bordeaux
| | - P Sargos
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Institut Bergonié, Bordeaux.
| | - E Barret
- Department of Urology, Institut Mutualiste Montsouris, 75014 Paris
| | - J-B Beauval
- Department of Urology, La Croix du Sud Hospital, 31445 Quint Fonsegrives, France
| | - L Brureau
- Department of Urology, CHU de Pointe-à-Pitre, University of Antilles, Inserm, EHESP, Irset-UMR_S 1085, 97110 Pointe-à-Pitre, France
| | - G Créhange
- Department of Radiation Oncology Curie Institute, 75005 Paris
| | - C Dariane
- Department of Urology, Hôpital européen Georges-Pompidou, APHP, Paris-Paris University-U1151 Inserm-INEM, Necker, 75015 Paris
| | - G Fiard
- Department of Urology, Grenoble Alpes University Hospital, Université Grenoble Alpes, CNRS, Grenoble INP, TIMC-IMAG, 38000 Grenoble, France
| | - G Fromont
- Department of Pathology, CHRU, 37000 Tours, France
| | - R Mathieu
- Department of Urology, CHU Rennes, 35000 Rennes, France
| | - R Renard-Penna
- Radiology, Pitie-Salpetriere Hospital, Sorbonne University, AP-HP, 75013 Paris, France
| | - G Roubaud
- Department of Medical oncology, Institut Bergonié, Bordeaux
| | - A Ruffion
- Service d'urologie Centre Hospitalier Lyon Sud, Hospices Civils de Lyon, Equipe 2 - Centre d'Innovation en cancérologie de Lyon (EA 3738 CICLY) - Faculté de médecine Lyon Sud - Université Lyon 1, 69000 Lyon, France
| | - M Rouprêt
- GRC 5 Predictive Onco-Uro, Urology, Pitie-Salpetriere Hospital, Sorbonne University, AP-HP, 75013 Paris
| | - G Ploussard
- Department of Urology, La Croix du Sud Hospital, 31445 Quint Fonsegrives, France; Department of Urology, CHU de Pointe-à-Pitre, University of Antilles, Inserm, EHESP, Irset-UMR_S 1085, 97110 Pointe-à-Pitre, France; Department of Radiation Oncology Curie Institute, 75005 Paris; Department of Urology, Hôpital européen Georges-Pompidou, APHP, Paris-Paris University-U1151 Inserm-INEM, Necker, 75015 Paris; Department of Urology, Grenoble Alpes University Hospital, Université Grenoble Alpes, CNRS, Grenoble INP, TIMC-IMAG, 38000 Grenoble, France; Department of Pathology, CHRU, 37000 Tours, France; Department of Urology, CHU Rennes, 35000 Rennes, France; Radiology, Pitie-Salpetriere Hospital, Sorbonne University, AP-HP, 75013 Paris, France; Service d'urologie Centre Hospitalier Lyon Sud, Hospices Civils de Lyon, Equipe 2 - Centre d'Innovation en cancérologie de Lyon (EA 3738 CICLY) - Faculté de médecine Lyon Sud - Université Lyon 1, 69000 Lyon, France; GRC 5 Predictive Onco-Uro, Urology, Pitie-Salpetriere Hospital, Sorbonne University, AP-HP, 75013 Paris; Institut Universitaire du Cancer Oncopole, 31000 Toulouse, France
| | - M Gauthé
- Department of Nuclear medicine, Scintep, 38000 Grenoble
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Ferrari M, Renard J, Pereira Mestre R, Bosetti DG, Stoffel F, Treglia G. Change of management by using hybrid imaging with radiolabelled choline in biochemical recurrent prostate cancer: a systematic review and a meta-analysis. Clin Transl Imaging 2021. [DOI: 10.1007/s40336-020-00407-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
|
6
|
Abstract
Prostate cancer is the commonest malignancy to affect men in the United Kingdom. Extraprostatic disease detection at staging and in the setting of biochemical recurrence is essential in determining treatment strategy. Conventional imaging including computed tomography and bone scintigraphy are limited in their ability to detect sites of loco-regional nodal and metastatic bone disease, particularly at clinically relevant low prostate-specific antigen levels. The use of positron emission tomography-computed tomography has helped overcome these deficiencies and is leading a paradigm shift in the management of prostate cancer using a wide range of radiopharmaceuticals. Their mechanisms of action, utility in both staging and biochemical recurrence, and comparative strengths and weaknesses will be covered in this article.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Manil Subesinghe
- King's College London & Guy's & St. Thomas' PET Centre, St. Thomas' Hospital, London, UK; Department of Cancer Imaging, School of Biomedical Engineering and Imaging Sciences, King's College London, London, UK.
| | - Meghana Kulkarni
- Department of Cancer Imaging, School of Biomedical Engineering and Imaging Sciences, King's College London, London, UK
| | - Gary J Cook
- King's College London & Guy's & St. Thomas' PET Centre, St. Thomas' Hospital, London, UK; Department of Cancer Imaging, School of Biomedical Engineering and Imaging Sciences, King's College London, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
López Rodríguez E, Tirado Hospital J, Álvarez Pérez R, Gómez Izquierdo L, Jiménez-Hoyuela J. Usefulness of 18F-Choline Positron Emission Tomography - Computed Tomography in the therapeutic management of patients with biochemical recurrence of prostate adenocarcinoma treated with brachytherapy. Actas Urol Esp 2020; 44:437-443. [PMID: 32576406 DOI: 10.1016/j.acuro.2020.05.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/30/2019] [Revised: 04/19/2020] [Accepted: 05/03/2020] [Indexed: 10/24/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE The objective of the study was to evaluate the usefulness of 18F-choline PET/CT in biochemically recurrent prostate cancer patients treated with brachytherapy, as well as to assess the changes in therapeutic management derived from its outcome. MATERIAL AND METHODS Retrospective study of 20 patients between 51 and 78 years old, with a history of prostate adenocarcinoma that had been treated with brachytherapy and presented biochemical recurrence (PSA 3.1-12 ng/ml) and staging tests (CT and bone scan) without alterations, were included. The findings visualized in the PET/CT scan with 18F-choline were correlated with the histopathology and/or the evolution of the PSA after therapy. RESULTS 18F-choline PET/CT scan only detected local recurrence in 15 patients. Local and regional recurrences were seen in 4 patients, and 1 patient presented local and bone recurrence. Local recurrence detected in PET was confirmed by anatomopathological studies in 85% of the cases. In one patient, these findings (PET scan) turned out to be prostatitis, and it could not be confirmed in another patient. Of the cases with local and regional recurrence, local recurrence was histologically confirmed in 3 out of 4 patients. 18F-choline PET/CT changed the therapeutic management in 25% of the patients, discarding the initially planned salvage surgery in 3 cases, 1 radiotherapy and 1 brachytherapy. CONCLUSION 18F-choline PET/CT could be a useful technique in the group of patients with biochemical recurrence after brachytherapy, providing locoregional and distant involvement findings which had not been detected with conventional imaging tests, thus determining a more adequate therapeutic management.
Collapse
|
8
|
Scarsbrook AF, Bottomley D, Teoh EJ, Bradley KM, Payne H, Afaq A, Bomanji J, van As N, Chua S, Hoskin P, Chambers A, Cook GJ, Warbey VS, Han S, Leung HY, Chau A, Miller MP, Gleeson FV. Effect of 18F-Fluciclovine Positron Emission Tomography on the Management of Patients With Recurrence of Prostate Cancer: Results From the FALCON Trial. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2020; 107:316-324. [PMID: 32068113 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2020.01.050] [Citation(s) in RCA: 42] [Impact Index Per Article: 10.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/11/2019] [Revised: 12/17/2019] [Accepted: 01/31/2020] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE Early and accurate localization of lesions in patients with biochemical recurrence (BCR) of prostate cancer may guide salvage therapy decisions. The present study, 18F-Fluciclovine PET/CT in biochemicAL reCurrence Of Prostate caNcer (FALCON; NCT02578940), aimed to evaluate the effect of 18F-fluciclovine on management of men with BCR of prostate cancer. METHODS AND MATERIALS Men with a first episode of BCR after curative-intent primary therapy were enrolled at 6 UK sites. Patients underwent 18F-fluciclovine positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) according to standardized procedures. Clinicians documented management plans before and after scanning, recording changes to treatment modality as major and changes within a modality as other. The primary outcome measure was record of a revised management plan postscan. Secondary endpoints were evaluation of optimal prostate specific antigen (PSA) threshold for detection, salvage treatment outcome assessment based on 18F-fluciclovine-involvement, and safety. RESULTS 18F-Fluciclovine was well tolerated in the 104 scanned patients (median PSA = 0.79 ng/mL). Lesions were detected in 58 out of 104 (56%) patients. Detection was broadly proportional to PSA level; ≤1 ng/mL, 1 out of 3 of scans were positive, and 93% scans were positive at PSA >2.0 ng/mL. Sixty-six (64%) patients had a postscan management change (80% after a positive result). Major changes (43 out of 66; 65%) were salvage or systemic therapy to watchful waiting (16 out of 66; 24%); salvage therapy to systemic therapy (16 out of 66; 24%); and alternative changes to treatment modality (11 out of 66, 17%). The remaining 23 out of 66 (35%) management changes were modifications of the prescan plan: most (22 out of 66; 33%) were adjustments to planned brachytherapy/radiation therapy to include a 18F-fluciclovine-guided boost. Where 18F-fluciclovine guided salvage therapy, the PSA response rate was higher than when 18F-fluciclovine was not involved (15 out of 17 [88%] vs 28 out of 39 [72%]). CONCLUSIONS 18F-Fluciclovine PET/CT located recurrence in the majority of men with BCR, frequently resulting in major management plan changes. Incorporating 18F-fluciclovine PET/CT into treatment planning may optimize targeting of recurrence sites and avoid futile salvage therapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Andrew F Scarsbrook
- Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Leeds, United Kingdom; University of Leeds, Leeds, United Kingdom.
| | | | | | - Kevin M Bradley
- PETIC, Wales Research and Diagnostic PET Imaging Centre, Cardiff, United Kingdom
| | - Heather Payne
- University College London Hospitals, NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom
| | - Asim Afaq
- University College London Hospitals, NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom
| | - Jamshed Bomanji
- University College London Hospitals, NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom
| | - Nicholas van As
- The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom
| | - Sue Chua
- The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom
| | - Peter Hoskin
- Mount Vernon Cancer Centre, London, United Kingdom
| | | | - Gary J Cook
- King's College London and Guy's & St Thomas' PET Centre, St Thomas' Hospital, London, United Kingdom
| | - Victoria S Warbey
- King's College London and Guy's & St Thomas' PET Centre, St Thomas' Hospital, London, United Kingdom
| | - Sai Han
- West of Scotland PET Centre, Gartnavel General Hospital, Glasgow, United Kingdom
| | - Hing Y Leung
- Institute of Cancer Sciences, College of Medical, Veterinary and Life Sciences, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, United Kingdom; CRUK Beatson Institute, Glasgow, United Kingdom
| | - Albert Chau
- Blue Earth Diagnostics, Oxford, United Kingdom
| | | | - Fergus V Gleeson
- Departments of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Oxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Oxford, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Comparison of 18F-sodium fluoride PET/CT, 18F-fluorocholine PET/CT and diffusion-weighted MRI for the detection of bone metastases in recurrent prostate cancer: a cost-effectiveness analysis in France. BMC Med Imaging 2020; 20:25. [PMID: 32122345 PMCID: PMC7052960 DOI: 10.1186/s12880-020-00425-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/08/2020] [Accepted: 02/18/2020] [Indexed: 01/14/2023] Open
Abstract
Background The diagnostic performance of 18F-sodium fluoride positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) (NaF), 18F-fluorocholine PET/CT (FCH) and diffusion-weighted whole-body magnetic resonance imaging (DW-MRI) in detecting bone metastases in prostate cancer (PCa) patients with first biochemical recurrence (BCR) has already been published, but their cost-effectiveness in this indication have never been compared. Methods We performed trial-based and model-based economic evaluations. In the trial, PCa patients with first BCR after previous definitive treatment were prospectively included. Imaging readings were performed both on-site by local specialists and centrally by experts. The economic evaluation extrapolated the diagnostic performances of the imaging techniques using a combination of a decision tree and Markov model based on the natural history of PCa. The health states were non-metastatic and metastatic BCR, non-metastatic and metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer and death. The state-transition probabilities and utilities associated with each health state were derived from the literature. Real costs were extracted from the National Cost Study of hospital costs and the social health insurance cost schedule. Results There was no significant difference in diagnostic performance among the 3 imaging modalities in detecting bone metastases. FCH was the most cost-effective imaging modality above a threshold incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of 3000€/QALY when imaging was interpreted by local specialists and 9000€/QALY when imaging was interpreted by experts. Conclusions FCH had a better incremental effect on QALY, independent of imaging reading and should be preferred for detecting bone metastases in patients with biochemical recurrence of prostate cancer. Trial registration NCT01501630. Registered 29 December 2011.
Collapse
|
10
|
Turpin A, Girard E, Baillet C, Pasquier D, Olivier J, Villers A, Puech P, Penel N. Imaging for Metastasis in Prostate Cancer: A Review of the Literature. Front Oncol 2020; 10:55. [PMID: 32083008 PMCID: PMC7005012 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2020.00055] [Citation(s) in RCA: 38] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/01/2019] [Accepted: 01/13/2020] [Indexed: 12/31/2022] Open
Abstract
Background: Initial staging and assessment of treatment activity in metastatic prostate cancer (PCa) patients is controversial. Indications for the various available imaging modalities are not well-established due to rapid advancements in imaging and treatment. Methods: We conducted a critical literature review of the main imaging abnormalities that suggest a diagnosis of metastasis in localized and locally advanced PCa or in cases of biological relapse. We also assessed the role of the various imaging modalities available in routine clinical practice for the detection of metastases and response to treatment in metastatic PCa patients. Results: In published clinical trials, the most commonly used imaging modalities for the detection and evaluation of therapeutic response are bone scan, abdominopelvic computed tomography (CT), and pelvic and bone magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). For the detection and follow-up of metastases during treatment, modern imaging techniques i.e., choline-positron emission tomography (PET), fluciclovine-PET, or Prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA)-PET provide better sensitivity and specificity. This is particularly the case of fluciclovine-PET and PSMA-PET in cases of biochemical recurrence with low values of prostate specific antigen. Conclusions: In routine clinical practice, conventional imaging still have a role, and communication between imagers and clinicians should be encouraged. Present and future clinical trials should use modern imaging methods to clarify their usage.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anthony Turpin
- Department of Medical Oncology, CHU Lille, Lille, France.,Univ. Lille, CNRS, Inserm, CHU Lille, Institut Pasteur de Lille, UMR9020 - UMR-S 1277 - Canther - Cancer Heterogeneity, Plasticity and Resistance to Therapies, Lille, France
| | - Edwina Girard
- Medical Oncology Department, Centre Oscar Lambret, Lille, France
| | - Clio Baillet
- Nuclear Medicine Department, CHU Lille, Lille, France
| | - David Pasquier
- Academic Department of Radiation Oncology, Centre Oscar Lambret, Lille, France.,CRISTAL UMR CNRS 9189, Lille University, Villeneuve-d'Ascq, France
| | | | | | | | - Nicolas Penel
- Department of Medical Oncology, CHU Lille, Lille, France.,Medical Oncology Department, Centre Oscar Lambret, Lille, France
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Qualitative and quantitative reproducibility of [18]fluoromethycholine PET/computed tomography in prostate cancer. Nucl Med Commun 2020; 41:147-154. [PMID: 31939917 DOI: 10.1097/mnm.0000000000001129] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/24/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Recurrence occurs in more than 50% of prostate cancer. To be effective, treatments require precise localization of tumor cells. [F]fluoromethylcholine ([18F]FCH) PET/computed tomography (CT) is currently used to restage disease in cases of biochemical relapse. To be used for therapy response as has been suggested, repeatability limits of PET derived indices need to be established. OBJECTIVE The aim of our study was to prospectively assess the qualitative and quantitative reproducibility [18F]FCH PET/CT in prostate cancer. METHODS Patients with histologically proven prostate cancer referred for initial staging or restaging were prospectively included. All patients underwent two [18F]FCH PET/CTs in the same conditions within a maximum of 3 weeks' time. We studied the repeatability of the visual report and the repeatability of SUVmax and its evolution over the acquisition time in lesions, liver and vascular background. Statistical analysis was performed using the Bland-Altman approach. RESULTS Twenty-one patients were included. Reporting repeatability was excellent with 97.8% of concordance. Mean repeatability of SUVmax considering all times and all lesions was 2.2% ± 20. Evolution of SUVmax was unpredictable, either increasing or decreasing over the acquisition time, both for lesions and for physiological activity. CONCLUSION Our study demonstrated that visual report of [18F]FCH PET/CT was very reproducible and that the repeatability limits of SUVmax was similar to those of other PET radiotracers. An SUVmax difference of more than 40% should be considered as representing a treatment response effect. Change of SUVmax during the acquisition time varied and should not be considered as an interpretation criterion.
Collapse
|
12
|
Effect of positive carbon-11-choline PET/CT results in the therapeutic management of prostate cancer biochemical relapse. Nucl Med Commun 2018; 40:79-85. [PMID: 30521498 PMCID: PMC6282669 DOI: 10.1097/mnm.0000000000000936] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Carbon-11-(C)-choline PET/computed tomography (CT) has shown good results in re-staging of prostate cancer (PCa) with raised serum levels of prostate-specific antigen. Our aim was to evaluate the effect of positive C-choline PET/CT results in the therapeutic management of patients with PCa with biochemical relapse (BR) after curative intention treatment. PATIENTS AND METHODS A total of 112 patients with PCa BR and positive C-choline PET/CT were retrospectively evaluated. PET/CT was acquired 20 min after intravenous administration of 555-740 MBq of C-choline. The therapeutic management after C-choline PET/CT was obtained from the clinical records. The minimum follow-up time was 18 months. RESULTS In 80 (71.4%) of 112 patients, C-choline PET/CT showed local recurrence of PCa; in 17 (15.2%) patients, distant recurrence; and in 15 (13.4%) patients, local plus distant recurrence. A second malignancy was detected in five (4.5%) patients. The planned therapeutic management was changed as per positive C-choline PET/CT result in 74 (66.1%) patients and were treated as follows: 31 (27.7%) patients with HT, combined with other treatments in eight (7.1%), 17 (15.2%) with BT, 13 (11.6%) with external beam radiotherapy, one (0.9%) with RP, and four (3.6%) with chemotherapy. Treatment approach was not modified in 37 (33%) patients. No data was available from one (0.9%) patient. CONCLUSION Positive C-choline PET/CT result had an important effect in the therapeutic management of patients with PCa and BR, leading to a change in the planned approach in two (66.1%) out of three patients. In addition, in 4.5% of the patients, the C-choline PET/CT allowed the detection of a second malignancy.
Collapse
|
13
|
Gauthé M, Aveline C, Lecouvet F, Michaud L, Rousseau C, Tassart M, Cussenot O, Talbot JN, Durand-Zaleski I. Impact of sodium 18F-fluoride PET/CT, 18F-fluorocholine PET/CT and whole-body diffusion-weighted MRI on the management of patients with prostate cancer suspicious for metastasis: a prospective multicentre study. World J Urol 2018; 37:1587-1595. [PMID: 30382380 DOI: 10.1007/s00345-018-2547-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/03/2018] [Accepted: 10/25/2018] [Indexed: 11/30/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE To compare the impact of 18F-sodium-fluoride (NaF) PET/CT, 18F-fluorocholine (FCH) PET/CT and diffusion-weighted whole-body MRI (DW-MRI) on the management of patients with prostate cancer (PCa) suspicious for distant metastasis. METHODS Prostate cancer patients were prospectively included between December 2011 and August 2014 and benefited from these three whole-body imaging (WBI) modalities within 1 month in addition to the standard PCa workup. Management was prospectively decided by clinicians during two multidisciplinary meetings, before and after the whole-body imaging workup. Rates of induced changes of whole-body imaging modalities were compared by Cochran's Q test. RESULTS One-hundred-one patients (27 at staging, 59 at first biochemical recurrence (BCR) and 15 at first episode of rising serum level of prostate-specific antigen during androgen-deprivation therapy) were included. The overall rate of management changes was 52%: 29% as a consequence of WBI, higher for FCH-PET/CT than for NaF-PET/CT or DW-MRI (p < 0.0001) and highest (41%) for FCH-PET/CT at BCR. Actual management was adequate in all patients but two. CONCLUSIONS Whole-body imaging induced a change in management in approximately a third of PCa patients suspicious for metastasis. The impact rate was determined to be greatest at first BCR using FCH-PET/CT. NaF-PET/CT and DW-MRI seemed less useful in this context.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mathieu Gauthé
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Hôpital Tenon, Assistance Publique Hôpitaux de Paris (AP-HP), Sorbonne Université, 4 rue de la Chine, 75020, Paris, France. .,AP-HP Health Economics Research Unit, INSERM UMR 1123, Paris, France.
| | - Cyrielle Aveline
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Hôpital Tenon, Assistance Publique Hôpitaux de Paris (AP-HP), Sorbonne Université, 4 rue de la Chine, 75020, Paris, France
| | - Frédéric Lecouvet
- Department of Radiology, Centre du Cancer, Institut de Recherche Expérimentale Et Clinique, Cliniques Universitaires Saint-Luc, Université Catholique de Louvain, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Laure Michaud
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Hôpital Tenon, Assistance Publique Hôpitaux de Paris (AP-HP), Sorbonne Université, 4 rue de la Chine, 75020, Paris, France
| | - Caroline Rousseau
- Nuclear Medicine Unit, ICO Gauducheau Cancer Centre, Saint-Herblain, France.,Nantes-Angers Cancer Research Centre, INSERM U892, CNRS UMR 6299, Université de Nantes, Nantes, France
| | - Marc Tassart
- Department of Radiology, Hôpital Tenon, AP-HP, Sorbonne Université, Paris, France
| | - Olivier Cussenot
- Department of Urology, Hôpital Tenon, AP-HP, Sorbonne Université, Paris, France.,GRC No 5, ONCOTYPE-URO, Institut Universitaire de Cancérologie, Sorbonne Université, Paris, France
| | - Jean-Noël Talbot
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Hôpital Tenon, Assistance Publique Hôpitaux de Paris (AP-HP), Sorbonne Université, 4 rue de la Chine, 75020, Paris, France
| | - Isabelle Durand-Zaleski
- AP-HP Health Economics Research Unit, INSERM UMR 1123, Paris, France.,Service de Santé Publique, Hôpital Henri Mondor, AP-HP, Université Paris 12, Créteil, France
| |
Collapse
|