Buttock tissue response to loading in men with spinal cord injury

Reducing pressure with the goal of improving outcomes: a retrospective chart review of cushion evaluations and recommendations at one seating clinic

PURPOSE

To describe the current seating recommendations made by a seating clinic for wheelchair users who presented with a Pressure Injury (PrI) or history of PrI.

METHODS

Retrospective review of electronic medical records of 133 adults who used a wheelchair as their primary means of mobility who had a cushion evaluation during which interface pressure mapping data was documented.

RESULTS

Clinicians adjusted 71% of participants' wheelchair cushions, including 49% who received a new cushion, and 37% of participants' wheelchairs. The most common adjustments besides receiving a new cushion were: addition of an underlay, adjusting the inflation of a cushion, and adjustments to the foot or back support of the wheelchair. Forty-five participants only received adjustments (i.e. no new cushion), while 23 participants only received education and feedback rather than equipment modifications. Those 23 participants had significantly lower Peak Pressure Index (PPI) than those who received equipment modifications (mean [95% CI] 76.7 [59.1, 94.3] versus 111.6 [102.1, 121.2] respectively, p = 0.001). The PPI was reduced by an average of 22.5 mmHg from the initial to final seating system amongst those who received modifications ([13.9-31.0], p<.001).

CONCLUSIONS

The seating clinicians considered interface pressure mapping in their decision-making and effectively reduced interface pressures with their interventions. Cushion replacement is important when someone presents with a PrI. However, adjusting an existing wheelchair cushion and/or seating system provides important additions and alternatives to consider for reducing interface pressure. There is also a role for education about proper use of equipment, weight shifts, and alternate seating surfaces.

The relationship between in-seat movement and pressure ulcers in wheelchair users with SCI/D

OBJECTIVE

To identify parameters that are associated with time at pressure, are most related to pressure ulcer outcomes, and that may be used to influence pressure ulcer (PrU) outcomes in future intervention studies.

DESIGN

Analysis used datasets from cross-sectional and longitudinal observational studies. Wheelchair-usage and in-seat metrics thresholds were optimized to differentiate individuals in PrU or No PrU groups. Logistic regression identified the demographics and in-seat activity metrics that impacted PrU outcomes.

SETTING

General Community.

PARTICIPANTS

Fifty individuals with spinal cord injuries and/or disorders (SCI/D) who use a wheelchair as their primary mobility device. 22 subjects were within the first year following injury and 28 had been using a wheelchair for over 2 years. Twenty-one participants reported PrU outcomes.

INTERVENTIONS

Not applicable.

OUTCOME MEASURES

Time in chair, pressure relief frequency, weight shift frequency, percentage of seated time that the subject is active (CoP Percent Active), frequency of in-seat movement, unloading event frequency, maximum time between events, and number of transfers.

RESULTS

Optimal cutoff thresholds for the most significant in-seat movement metrics included: unloading event frequency of 3.1 times per hour (OR 0.353, 95% CI [0.110, 1.137]), maximum time between events of 155.4 min (OR 2.888, 95% CI [0.886, 9.413]), and CoP Percent Active of 2.6% (OR 0.221, 95% CI [0.063, 0.767]). When individuals were more active than these cutoffs, significantly more individuals were in the no pressure ulcer group. In predictive modeling, CoP Percent Active was the in-seat movement metric that significantly predicted PrU outcomes. The model was improved by adding age, occupation, and injury completeness.

CONCLUSION

Of the 4 significant predictors in the model, only CoP Percent Active was modifiable. Therefore, an opportunity exists to design approaches to modify behavior. However, the results illustrate that the key to preventative movement may be through functional movement as opposed to scheduled, routine pressure reliefs.

The Role of Shear Stress and Shear Strain in Pressure Injury Development

ABSTRACT

Although other patient safety indicators have seen a decline, pressure injury (PI) incidence has continued to rise. In this article, the authors discuss the role of shear stress and shear strain in PI development and describe how accurate assessment and management can reduce PI risk. They provide explanations of shear stress, shear strain, friction, and tissue deformation to support a better clinical understanding of how damaging these forces are for soft tissue. Clinicians must carefully assess each patient's risk factors regarding shear forces within the contexts of activity and mobility. The authors also provide a toolbox of mitigation strategies, including support surface selection, selection of materials that contact the individual, management of immobility using positioning techniques, and the use of safe patient handling techniques. With a clear understanding of how shear forces affect PI risk and mitigation strategies, clinicians will more accurately assess PI risk and improve PI prevention care plans, ultimately reducing PI incidence to become more aligned with other patient safety indicators.

The theory and practice of pressure ulcer/injury risk assessment: a critical discussion

Pressure ulcer/injury (PU) risk assessment is widely considered an essential component in clinical practice. It is a complex and broad concept that includes different approaches, such as clinical judgement, using standardised risk assessment instruments, skin assessments, or using devices to measure skin or tissue properties. A distinction between PU risk assessment and early detection is important. PU risk measures the individual's susceptibility to developing a PU under a specific exposure (primary prevention), and early detection includes the assessment of early (sub)clinical signs and symptoms to prevent progression and to support healing (secondary prevention). PU risk is measured using prognostic/risk factors or prognostic models. Every risk estimate is a probability statement containing varying degrees of uncertainty. It therefore follows that every clinical decision based on risk estimates also contains uncertainty. PU risk assessment and prevention is a complex intervention, where delivery contains several interacting components. There is a huge body of evidence indicating that risk assessment and its outcomes, the selection of preventive interventions and PU incidence are not well connected. Methods for prognostic model development and testing in PU risk research must be improved and follow state-of-the-art methodological standards. Despite these challenges, we do have substantial knowledge about PU risk factors that helps us to make better clinical decisions. An important next step in the development of PU risk prediction might be the combination of clinical and other predictors for more individualised care. Any prognostic test or procedure must lead to better prevention at an acceptable cost.

A review of the characterizations of soft tissues used in human body modeling: Scope, limitations, and the path forward

Soft tissue material properties are vital to human body models that evaluate interactions between the human body and its environment. Such models evaluate internal stress/strain responses in soft tissues to investigate issues like pressure injuries. Numerous constitutive models and parameters have been used to represent mechanical behavior of soft tissues in biomechanical models under quasi-static loading. However, researchers reported that generic material properties cannot accurately represent specific target populations due to large inter-individual variability. Two challenges that exist are experimental mechanical characterization and constitutive modeling of biological soft tissues and personalization of constitutive parameters using non-invasive, non-destructive bedside testing methods. It is imperative to understand the scope and appropriate applications for reported material properties. Thus, the goal of this paper was to compile studies from which soft tissue material properties were obtained and categorize them by source of tissue samples, methods used to quantify deformation, and material models used to describe tissues. The collected studies displayed wide ranges of material properties, and factors that affected the properties included whether tissue samples were in vivo or ex vivo, from humans or animals, the body region tested, body position during in vivo studies, deformation measurements, and material models used to describe tissues. Because of the factors that affected reported material properties, it is clear that much progress has been made in understanding soft tissue responses to loading, yet there is a need to broaden the scope of reported soft tissue material properties and better match reported properties to appropriate human body models.

Mechanical analysis of deep tissue injury during sitting in patients with spinal cord injury via parametric finite element model

Spinal cord injury patients are prone to develop deep tissue injury because of long-term mechanical load. However, there is a lack of statistical research on the influence of tissue characteristics on the internal mechanical state of soft tissue. This study aimed to investigate the influence of tissue characteristics on the internal mechanical state of buttock in spinal cord injury patients. A three-dimensional reference buttock model was established and a visualization program was generated to modify the parameter values. Through changing the muscle atrophy, body mass index and the radius of curvature of the ischial tuberosity, 96 different model variants were simulated and validated in this study. With body mass index increasing from 16 to 40, the principal shear stress was 10.4 times principal compressive stress, the maximum shear strain and the max cluster volume increased by 1.2 (P < 0.001) and 8.8 times (P < 0.001), respectively. The interaction between BMI and muscle atrophy was significant when BMI was greater than or equal to 22.5 kg/m². In all BMI stages, when the radius of curvature of the ischial tuberosity was 19 mm, the internal stress of the tissue always occupies the highest value. The results demonstrate that body mass index is the most important factor affecting the risk of buttock deep tissue injury. This study provides insights into investigation of inter-individual factors influencing the soft tissue response and assessment of deep tissue injury risk during sitting.

Our contemporary understanding of the aetiology of pressure ulcers/pressure injuries

In 2019, the third and updated edition of the Clinical Practice Guideline (CPG) on Prevention and Treatment of Pressure Ulcers/Injuries has been published. In addition to this most up‐to‐date evidence‐based guidance for clinicians, related topics such as pressure ulcers (PUs)/pressure injuries (PIs) aetiology, classification, and future research needs were considered by the teams of experts. To elaborate on these topics, this is the third paper of a series of the CPG articles, which summarises the latest understanding of the aetiology of PUs/PIs with a special focus on the effects of soft tissue deformation. Sustained deformations of soft tissues cause initial cell death and tissue damage that ultimately may result in the formation of PUs/PIs. High tissue deformations result in cell damage on a microscopic level within just a few minutes, although it may take hours of sustained loading for the damage to become clinically visible. Superficial skin damage seems to be primarily caused by excessive shear strain/stress exposures, deeper PUs/PIs predominantly result from high pressures in combination with shear at the surface over bony prominences, or under stiff medical devices. Therefore, primary PU/PI prevention should aim for minimising deformations by either reducing the peak strain/stress values in tissues or decreasing the exposure time.

Tissue matters: In-vivo tissue properties of persons with spinal cord injuries to inform clinical models for pressure ulcer prevention

The prevalence of pressure ulcers in patients with spinal cord injuries has been estimated to be between 30% and 47%. Individuals with spinal cord injuries sit for a majority of the time, increasing the risk of developing pressure ulcers in the buttocks and thighs due to large internal stresses. Human body models have been developed to study the formation of pressure ulcers, yet a persistent limitation in these models has been the material properties used to represent the soft tissues in the buttocks and thighs. Specifically, soft tissue material property data have not included wheelchair users, such as those with spinal cord injuries. The goals of this research were 1) to determine the in-vivo material properties of soft tissue in the thighs and buttocks of individuals with spinal cord injuries and 2) compare these to properties obtained from able-bodied people. Results indicated that the proximal and middle thigh regions of those who had a spinal cord injury were softer than the same regions as able-bodied individuals, while the distal thigh regions were stiffer. These findings are vital because they indicate that models developed using properties from able-bodied individuals will not produce internal stress or strain magnitudes that represent individuals who have a spinal cord injury. This information suggests that models should obtain material property data sets from their desired population. Human body models must represent the population being studied if they are to inform clinical assessments and make accurate patient predictions.

Seated buttocks anatomy and its impact on biomechanical risk

AIM

The objective of this study was to describe the amount, types, and shapes of tissue present in the buttocks during sitting (i.e., seated buttocks soft tissue anatomy), and the impact of seated buttocks soft tissue anatomy on biomechanical risk.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The buttocks of 35 people, including 29 full-time wheelchair users with and without a history of pelvic pressure ulcers were scanned sitting upright on 3" of flat HR45 foam in a FONAR Upright MRI. Multi-planar scans were analyzed to calculate bulk tissue thickness, tissue composition, gluteus maximus coverage at the ischium, the contour of the skin, and pelvic tilt.

RESULTS

Bulk tissue thickness varied from 5.6 to 32.1 mm, was composed mostly of adipose tissue, and was greatest in the able-bodied cohort. Skin contours varied significantly across status group, with wheelchair users with a history of pressure ulcers having tissue with a peaked contour with a radius of curvature of 65.9 mm that wrapped more closely to the ischium (thickness at the apex = 8.2 mm) as compared to wheelchair users with no pressure ulcer history (radius of curvature = 91.5 mm and apex thickness = 14.5 mm). Finally, the majority of participants presented with little to no gluteus coverage over their ischial tuberosity, regardless of status group.

CONCLUSIONS

This study provides quantitative evidence that Biomechanical Risk, or the intrinsic characteristic of an individual's soft tissues to deform in response to extrinsic applied forces, is greater in individuals at greater risk for pressure ulcers.