1
|
Johnson TJ, Meier PP, Schoeny ME, Bucek A, Janes JE, Kwiek JJ, Zupancic JAF, Keim SA, Patel AL. Study protocol for reducing disparity in receipt of mother's own milk in very low birth weight infants (ReDiMOM): a randomized trial to improve adherence to sustained maternal breast pump use. BMC Pediatr 2022; 22:27. [PMID: 34996401 PMCID: PMC8739536 DOI: 10.1186/s12887-021-03088-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/02/2021] [Accepted: 12/22/2021] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Black very low birth weight (VLBW; < 1500 g birth weight) and very preterm (VP, < 32 weeks gestational age, inclusive of extremely preterm, < 28 weeks gestational age) infants are significantly less likely than other VLBW and VP infants to receive mother's own milk (MOM) through to discharge from the neonatal intensive care unit (NICU). The costs associated with adhering to pumping maternal breast milk are borne by mothers and contribute to this disparity. This randomized controlled trial tests the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of an intervention to offset maternal costs associated with pumping. METHODS This randomized control trial will enroll 284 mothers and their VP infants to test an intervention (NICU acquires MOM) developed to facilitate maternal adherence to breast pump use by offsetting maternal costs that serve as barriers to sustaining MOM feedings and the receipt of MOM at NICU discharge. Compared to current standard of care (mother provides MOM), the intervention bundle includes three components: a) free hospital-grade electric breast pump, b) pickup of MOM, and c) payment for opportunity costs. The primary outcome is infant receipt of MOM at the time of NICU discharge, and secondary outcomes include infant receipt of any MOM during the NICU hospitalization, duration of MOM feedings (days), and cumulative dose of MOM feedings (total mL/kg of MOM) received by the infant during the NICU hospitalization; maternal duration of MOM pumping (days) and volume of MOM pumped (mLs); and total cost of NICU care. Additionally, we will compare the cost of the NICU acquiring MOM versus NICU acquiring donor human milk if MOM is not available and the cost-effectiveness of the intervention (NICU acquires MOM) versus standard of care (mother provides MOM). DISCUSSION This trial will determine the effectiveness of an economic intervention that transfers the costs of feeding VLBWand VP infants from mothers to the NICU to address the disparity in the receipt of MOM feedings at NICU discharge by Black infants. The cost-effectiveness analysis will provide data that inform the adoption and scalability of this intervention. TRIAL REGISTRATION ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT04540575 , registered September 7, 2020.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tricia J Johnson
- Department of Health Systems Management, Rush University, 1700 West Van Buren Street, TOB Suite 126B, Chicago, USA.
| | - Paula P Meier
- Department of Pediatrics, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, USA.,College of Nursing, Rush University, Chicago, USA
| | - Michael E Schoeny
- Department of Community, Systems and Mental Health Nursing, Rush University, Chicago, USA
| | - Amelia Bucek
- Department of Pediatrics, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, USA
| | - Judy E Janes
- Department of Pediatrics, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, USA
| | - Jesse J Kwiek
- Department of Microbiology, The Center for Retrovirus Research and the Infectious Disease Institute, The Ohio State University, Columbus, USA
| | - John A F Zupancic
- Department of Neonatology, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, USA.,Harvard Medical School, Boston, USA
| | - Sarah A Keim
- Center for Biobehavioral Health, The Abigail Wexner Research Institute, Nationwide Children's Hospital, Columbus, USA.,Department of Pediatrics, The Ohio State University College of Medicine, Columbus, USA.,Division of Epidemiology, The Ohio State University College of Public Health, Columbus, USA
| | - Aloka L Patel
- Department of Pediatrics, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, USA
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
James S, McLanahan S, Brooks-Gunn J. Contributions of the Fragile Families and Child Wellbeing Study to Child Development. ANNUAL REVIEW OF DEVELOPMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY 2021; 3:187-206. [PMID: 35721627 PMCID: PMC9205571 DOI: 10.1146/annurev-devpsych-050620-113832] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/15/2023]
Abstract
We describe the promise of the Fragile Families and Child Wellbeing Study (FFCWS) for developmental researchers. FFCWS is a birth cohort study of 4,898 children born in 1998-2000 in large US cities. This prospective national study collected data on children and parents at birth and during infancy (age 1), toddlerhood (age 3), early childhood (age 5), middle childhood (age 9), adolescence (age 15), and, in progress, young adulthood (age 22). Though FFCWS was created to understand the lives of unmarried parent families, its comprehensive data on parents, children, and contexts can be used to explore many other developmental questions. We identify six opportunities for developmentalists: (a) analyzing developmental trajectories, identifying the importance of the timing of exposures for later development, (c) documenting bidirectional influences on development, (d) understanding development in context, (e) identifying biological moderators and mechanisms, and ( f ) using an urban-born cohort that is large, diverse, and prospective.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sarah James
- Minnesota Population Center, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota 55455, USA
| | - Sara McLanahan
- Bendheim-Thoman Center for Research on Child Wellbeing, Princeton University, Princeton, New Jersey 08544, USA
| | - Jeanne Brooks-Gunn
- Teachers College and College of Physicians and Surgeons, Columbia University, New York, NY 10027, USA
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Bertmann F, Rogomentich K, Belarmino EH, Niles MT. The Food Bank and Food Pantries Help Food Insecure Participants Maintain Fruit and Vegetable Intake During COVID-19. Front Nutr 2021; 8:673158. [PMID: 34422877 PMCID: PMC8378669 DOI: 10.3389/fnut.2021.673158] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/26/2021] [Accepted: 07/13/2021] [Indexed: 12/03/2022] Open
Abstract
Charitable food services, including food banks and pantries, support individual and households' food access, potentially maintaining food security and diet quality during emergencies. During the COVID-19 pandemic, the use of food banks and pantries has increased in the US. Here we examine perceptions of food banks and food pantries and their relationship to food security and fruit and vegetable (FV) intake during the first 6 months of the COVID-19 pandemic, using a statewide representative survey (n = 600) of residents of Vermont. The utilization of food pantries was more common among food insecure households and households with children. Among food insecure respondents, those who did not use a food pantry were significantly more likely to report consuming less FV during the pandemic. Further, we find respondents who are food insecure and using a food pantry report consuming more FV since the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic. We found that respondents who were both food insecure and reported not using a food pantry were significantly more likely to report both a reduction in fruit consumption (b = −0.58; p = 0.001) and a reduction in vegetable consumption (b = −0.415; p = 0.012). These results indicate that these services may support food access and one important dimension of diet quality (FV intake) for at-risk populations during emergencies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Farryl Bertmann
- Department of Nutrition and Food Sciences, The University of Vermont, Burlington, VT, United States.,Food Systems Program, The University of Vermont, Burlington, VT, United States
| | - Katherine Rogomentich
- Department of Nutrition and Food Sciences, The University of Vermont, Burlington, VT, United States
| | - Emily H Belarmino
- Department of Nutrition and Food Sciences, The University of Vermont, Burlington, VT, United States.,Food Systems Program, The University of Vermont, Burlington, VT, United States.,Gund Institute for Environment, The University of Vermont, Burlington, VT, United States
| | - Meredith T Niles
- Department of Nutrition and Food Sciences, The University of Vermont, Burlington, VT, United States.,Food Systems Program, The University of Vermont, Burlington, VT, United States.,Gund Institute for Environment, The University of Vermont, Burlington, VT, United States
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Glei DA, Goldman N, Weinstein M. A growing socioeconomic divide: Effects of the Great Recession on perceived economic distress in the United States. PLoS One 2019; 14:e0214947. [PMID: 30947252 PMCID: PMC6448893 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0214947] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/06/2018] [Accepted: 03/23/2019] [Indexed: 11/19/2022] Open
Abstract
We demonstrate widening socioeconomic disparities in perceived economic distress among Americans, characterized by increasing distress at the bottom and improved perceptions at the top of the socioeconomic ladder. We then assess the extent to which hardships related to the Great Recession account for the growing social disparity in economic distress. Based on the concept of loss aversion, we also test whether the psychological pain associated with a financial loss is greater than the perceived benefit of an equivalent gain. Analyses are based on longitudinal survey data from the Midlife Development in the US study. Results suggest that widening social disparities in perceived economic distress between the mid-2000s and mid-2010s are explained in part by differential exposure to hardships related to the Great Recession, the effects of which have lingered even four to five years after the recession officially ended. Yet, auxiliary analyses show that the socioeconomic disparities in economic distress widened by nearly as much (if not more) during the period from 1995-96 to 2004-05 as they did during the period in which the recession occurred, which suggests that the factors driving these trends may have already been in motion prior to the recession. Consistent with the loss aversion hypothesis, perceptions of financial strain appear to be somewhat more strongly affected by losses in income/assets than by gains, but the magnitude of the differentials are small and the results are not robust. Our findings paint a dismal portrait of a growing socioeconomic divide in economic distress throughout the period from the mid-1990s to the mid-2010s, although we cannot say whether these trends afflict all regions of the US equally. Spatial analysis of aggregate-level mortality and objective economic indicators could provide indirect evidence, but ultimately economic "despair" must be measured subjectively by asking people how they perceive their financial situations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dana A. Glei
- Center for Population and Health, Georgetown University, Washington, District of Columbia, United States of America
| | - Noreen Goldman
- Office of Population Research, Princeton University, Princeton, New Jersey, United States of America
| | - Maxine Weinstein
- Center for Population and Health, Georgetown University, Washington, District of Columbia, United States of America
| |
Collapse
|