Context-dependent concurrent adaptation to static and moving targets

Movement-goal relevant object shape properties act as poor but viable cues for the attribution of motor errors to external objects

When a context change is detected during motor learning, motor memories-internal models for executing movements within some context-may be created or existing motor memories may be activated and modified. Assigning credit to plausible causes of errors can allow for fast retrieval and activation of a motor memory, or a combination of motor memories, when the presence of such causes is detected. Features of the movement-context intrinsic to the movement dynamics, such as posture of the end effector, are often effective cues for detecting context change whereas features extrinsic to the movement dynamics, such as the colour of an object being moved, are often not. These extrinsic cues are typically not relevant to the motor task at hand and can be safely ignored by the motor system. We conducted two experiments testing if extrinsic but movement-goal relevant object-shape cues during an object-transport task can act as viable contextual cues for error assignment to the object, and the creation of new, object-shape-associated motor memories. In the first experiment we find that despite the object-shape cues, errors are primarily attributed to the hand transporting the object. In a second experiment, we find participants can execute differing movements cued by the object shape in a dual adaptation task, but the extent of adaptation is small, suggesting that movement-goal relevant object-shape properties are poor but viable cues for creating context specific motor memories.

Asymmetric Cooperation Control of Dual-Arm Exoskeletons Using Human Collaborative Manipulation Models

The exoskeleton is mainly used by subjects who suffer muscle injury to enhance motor ability in the daily life environment. Previous research seldom considers extending human collaboration skills to human-robot collaborations. In this article, two models, that is: 1) the following the better model and 2) the interpersonal goal integration model, are designed to facilitate the human-human collaborative manipulation in tracking a moving target. Integrated with dual-arm exoskeletons, these two models can enable the robot to successfully perform target tracking with two human partners. Specifically, the manipulation workspace of the human-exoskeleton system is divided into a human region and a robot region. In the human region, the human acts as the leader during cooperation, while, in the robot region, the robot takes the leading role. A novel region-based Barrier Lyapunov function (BLF) is then designed to handle the change of leader roles between the human and the robot and ensures the operation within the constrained human and robot regions when driving the dual-arm exoskeleton to track the moving target. The designed adaptive controller ensures the convergence of tracking errors in the presence of region switches. Experiments are performed on the dual-arm robotic exoskeleton for the subject with muscle damage or some degree of motor dysfunctions to evaluate the proposed controller in tracking a moving target, and the experimental results demonstrate the effectiveness of the developed control.

Differential contributions of implicit and explicit learning mechanisms to various contextual cues in dual adaptation

The ability to switch between different visuomotor maps accurately and efficiently is an invaluable feature to a flexible and adaptive human motor system. This can be examined in dual adaptation paradigms where the motor system is challenged to perform under randomly switching, opposing perturbations. Typically, dual adaptation doesn’t proceed unless each mapping is trained in association with a predictive cue. To investigate this, we first explored whether dual adaptation occurs under a variety of contextual cues including active follow-through movements, passive follow-through movements, active lead-in movements, and static visual cues. In the second experiment, we provided one group with a compensatory strategy about the perturbations (30° CW and 30° CCW rotations) and their relationships to each context (static visual cues). We found that active, but not passive, movement cues elicited dual adaptation. Expectedly, we didn’t find evidence for dual adaptation using static visual cues, but those in the Instruction group compensated by implementing aiming strategies. Then, across all experimental conditions, we explored the extent by which dual learning is supported by both implicit and explicit mechanisms, regardless of whether they elicited dual adaptation across all the various cues. To this end, following perturbed training, participants from all experiments were asked to either use or ignore the strategy as they reached without visual feedback. This Process Dissociation Procedure teased apart the implicit and explicit contributions to dual adaptation. Critically, we didn’t find evidence for implicit learning for those given instructions, suggesting that when explicit aiming strategies are implemented in dual adaptation, implicit mechanisms are likely not involved. Thus, by implementing conscious strategies, dual adaptation can be easily facilitated even in cases where learning would not occur otherwise.