1
|
Henríquez L, Martín C, Echeverz M, Lasa Í, Ezpeleta C, Portillo ME. Evaluation of the use of sonication combined with enzymatic treatment for biofilm removal in the microbiological diagnosis of prosthetic joint infection. Microbiol Spectr 2024; 12:e0002024. [PMID: 38916322 PMCID: PMC11302281 DOI: 10.1128/spectrum.00020-24] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/04/2024] [Accepted: 05/14/2024] [Indexed: 06/26/2024] Open
Abstract
Sonicating explanted prosthetic implants to physically remove biofilms is a recognized method for improving the microbiological diagnosis of prosthetic joint infection (PJI); however, chemical and enzymatic treatments have been investigated as alternative biofilm removal methods. We compared the biofilm dislodging efficacy of sonication followed by the addition of enzyme cocktails with different activity spectra in the diagnosis of PJI with that of the sonication of fluid cultures alone. Consecutive patients who underwent prosthesis explantation due to infection at our institution were prospectively enrolled for 1 year. The diagnostic procedure included the collection of five intraoperative tissue cultures, sonication of the removed devices, and conventional culture of the sonication fluid. The resulting sonication fluid was also treated with an enzyme cocktail consisting of homemade dispersin B (0.04 µg/mL) and proteinase K (Sigma; 100 µg/mL) for 45 minutes at 37°C. The resulting sonication (S) and sonication with subsequent enzymatic treatment (SE) fluids were plated for aerobic and anaerobic culture broth for 7 days (aerobic) or 14 days (anaerobic). Identification was performed by matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization-time-of-flight mass spectrometry (Bruker). We included 107 patients from whom a prosthetic implant had been removed, among which PJI was diagnosed in 36 (34%). The sensitivity of S alone was significantly greater than that of SE alone (82% vs 71%; P < 0.05). Four patients with PJI were positive after sonication alone but negative after sonication plus enzymatic treatment. The four microorganisms missed after the addition of the enzyme cocktail were Staphylococcus aureus, two coagulase-negative Staphylococci, and Cutibacterium acnes. In conclusion, sonication alone was more sensitive than sonication followed by enzymatic treatment. The combination of these two methods had no synergistic effect; in contrast, the results suggest that the combination of both dislodgment methods affects the viability of gram-positive microorganisms. IMPORTANCE While the potential of sonication and enzymes as biofilm dispersal agents has been previously described, the originality of our work resides in the combination of both methods, which is hypothesized to enhance the ability to remove biofilm and, therefore, improve the microbiological diagnosis of PJI.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lucía Henríquez
- Department of Clinical Microbiology, University Hospital of Navarra, Institute of Healthcare Research of Navarra (IdiSNa), Pamplona, Spain
| | - Carmen Martín
- Department of Clinical Microbiology, University Hospital of Navarra, Institute of Healthcare Research of Navarra (IdiSNa), Pamplona, Spain
| | - Maite Echeverz
- Laboratory of Microbial Pathogenesis, Navarrabiomed, Public University of Navarra (UPNA), Institute of Healthcare Research of Navarra (IdiSNa), Pamplona, Spain
| | - Íñigo Lasa
- Laboratory of Microbial Pathogenesis, Navarrabiomed, Public University of Navarra (UPNA), Institute of Healthcare Research of Navarra (IdiSNa), Pamplona, Spain
| | - Carmen Ezpeleta
- Department of Clinical Microbiology, University Hospital of Navarra, Institute of Healthcare Research of Navarra (IdiSNa), Pamplona, Spain
| | - María Eugenia Portillo
- Department of Clinical Microbiology, University Hospital of Navarra, Institute of Healthcare Research of Navarra (IdiSNa), Pamplona, Spain
- CIBER, Epidemiología y Salud Pública, (CIBERESP), Madrid, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Mikziński P, Kraus K, Widelski J, Paluch E. Modern Microbiological Methods to Detect Biofilm Formation in Orthopedy and Suggestions for Antibiotic Therapy, with Particular Emphasis on Prosthetic Joint Infection (PJI). Microorganisms 2024; 12:1198. [PMID: 38930580 PMCID: PMC11205407 DOI: 10.3390/microorganisms12061198] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/12/2024] [Revised: 06/05/2024] [Accepted: 06/11/2024] [Indexed: 06/28/2024] Open
Abstract
Biofilm formation is a serious problem that relatively often causes complications in orthopedic surgery. Biofilm-forming pathogens invade implanted foreign bodies and surrounding tissues. Such a condition, if not limited at the appropriate time, often requires reoperation. This can be partially prevented by selecting an appropriate prosthesis material that prevents the development of biofilm. There are many modern techniques available to detect the formed biofilm. By applying them we can identify and visualize biofilm-forming microorganisms. The most common etiological factors associated with biofilms in orthopedics are: Staphylococcus aureus, coagulase-negative Staphylococci (CoNS), and Enterococcus spp., whereas Gram-negative bacilli and Candida spp. also deserve attention. It seems crucial, for therapeutic success, to eradicate the microorganisms able to form biofilm after the implantation of endoprostheses. Planning the effective targeted antimicrobial treatment of postoperative infections requires accurate identification of the microorganism responsible for the complications of the procedure. The modern microbiological testing techniques described in this article show the diagnostic options that can be followed to enable the implementation of effective treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Paweł Mikziński
- Faculty of Medicine, Wroclaw Medical University, Wyb. Pasteura 1, 50-376 Wroclaw, Poland; (P.M.); (K.K.)
| | - Karolina Kraus
- Faculty of Medicine, Wroclaw Medical University, Wyb. Pasteura 1, 50-376 Wroclaw, Poland; (P.M.); (K.K.)
| | - Jarosław Widelski
- Department of Pharmacognosy with Medicinal Plants Garden, Lublin Medical University, 20-093 Lublin, Poland;
| | - Emil Paluch
- Department of Microbiology, Faculty of Medicine, Wroclaw Medical University, Tytusa Chalubinskiego 4, 50-376 Wroclaw, Poland
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Azad MA, Patel R. Practical Guidance for Clinical Microbiology Laboratories: Microbiologic diagnosis of implant-associated infections. Clin Microbiol Rev 2024; 37:e0010423. [PMID: 38506553 PMCID: PMC11237642 DOI: 10.1128/cmr.00104-23] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 03/21/2024] Open
Abstract
SUMMARYImplant-associated infections (IAIs) pose serious threats to patients and can be associated with significant morbidity and mortality. These infections may be difficult to diagnose due, in part, to biofilm formation on device surfaces, and because even when microbes are found, their clinical significance may be unclear. Despite recent advances in laboratory testing, IAIs remain a diagnostic challenge. From a therapeutic standpoint, many IAIs currently require device removal and prolonged courses of antimicrobial therapy to effect a cure. Therefore, making an accurate diagnosis, defining both the presence of infection and the involved microorganisms, is paramount. The sensitivity of standard microbial culture for IAI diagnosis varies depending on the type of IAI, the specimen analyzed, and the culture technique(s) used. Although IAI-specific culture-based diagnostics have been described, the challenge of culture-negative IAIs remains. Given this, molecular assays, including both nucleic acid amplification tests and next-generation sequencing-based assays, have been used. In this review, an overview of these challenging infections is presented, as well as an approach to their diagnosis from a microbiologic perspective.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marisa Ann Azad
- Division of Infectious Diseases, Department of Medicine, The Ottawa Hospital, Ottawa, Canada
- Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, Canada
| | - Robin Patel
- Division of Public Health, Infectious Diseases, and Occupational Medicine, Department of Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA
- Division of Clinical Microbiology, Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Silva NDS, De Melo BST, Oliva A, de Araújo PSR. Sonication protocols and their contributions to the microbiological diagnosis of implant-associated infections: a review of the current scenario. Front Cell Infect Microbiol 2024; 14:1398461. [PMID: 38803573 PMCID: PMC11128543 DOI: 10.3389/fcimb.2024.1398461] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/09/2024] [Accepted: 04/29/2024] [Indexed: 05/29/2024] Open
Abstract
Addressing the existing problem in the microbiological diagnosis of infections associated with implants and the current debate about the real power of precision of sonicated fluid culture (SFC), the objective of this review is to describe the methodology and analyze and compare the results obtained in current studies on the subject. Furthermore, the present study also discusses and suggests the best parameters for performing sonication. A search was carried out for recent studies in the literature (2019-2023) that addressed this research topic. As a result, different sonication protocols were adopted in the studies analyzed, as expected, and consequently, there was significant variability between the results obtained regarding the sensitivity and specificity of the technique in relation to the traditional culture method (periprosthetic tissue culture - PTC). Coagulase-negative Staphylococcus (CoNS) and Staphylococcus aureus were identified as the main etiological agents by SFC and PTC, with SFC being important for the identification of pathogens of low virulence that are difficult to detect. Compared to chemical biofilm displacement methods, EDTA and DTT, SFC also produced variable results. In this context, this review provided an overview of the most current scenarios on the topic and theoretical support to improve sonication performance, especially with regard to sensitivity and specificity, by scoring the best parameters from various aspects, including sample collection, storage conditions, cultivation methods, microorganism identification techniques (both phenotypic and molecular) and the cutoff point for colony forming unit (CFU) counts. This study demonstrated the need for standardization of the technique and provided a theoretical basis for a sonication protocol that aims to achieve the highest levels of sensitivity and specificity for the reliable microbiological diagnosis of infections associated with implants and prosthetic devices, such as prosthetic joint infections (PJIs). However, practical application and additional complementary studies are still needed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Alessandra Oliva
- Dipartimento di Sanità Pubblica e Malattie Infettive - Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy
| | | |
Collapse
|
5
|
Hieda Y, Choe H, Ike H, Abe K, Kumagai K, Takeyama M, Kawabata Y, Kobayashi N, Inaba Y. Bead-beating assay during synovial fluid DNA extraction improves real-time PCR accuracy for periprosthetic joint infection. J Orthop Res 2024. [PMID: 38741241 DOI: 10.1002/jor.25871] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/30/2023] [Revised: 03/29/2024] [Accepted: 04/18/2024] [Indexed: 05/16/2024]
Abstract
Polymerase chain reaction (PCR)-based genetic diagnosis is a rapid and sensitive method to diagnose periprosthetic joint infection (PJI). DNA extraction using bead beating is an effective method for collecting bacterial genes in Gram-positive bacteria. We compared the detection accuracy between the conventional and bead-beating DNA extraction assay. The detection rate improved from 86.7% using the conventional method to 95.6% using the bead-beating. Our results suggest that bead-beating during DNA extraction can improve the accuracy of PCR-based genetic diagnosis of PJI.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yuta Hieda
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Yokohama City University, Yokohama City, Kanagawa, Japan
| | - Hyonmin Choe
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Yokohama City University, Yokohama City, Kanagawa, Japan
| | - Hiroyuki Ike
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Yokohama City University, Yokohama City, Kanagawa, Japan
| | - Koki Abe
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Yokohama City University, Yokohama City, Kanagawa, Japan
| | - Ken Kumagai
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Yokohama City University, Yokohama City, Kanagawa, Japan
| | - Masanobu Takeyama
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Yokohama City University, Yokohama City, Kanagawa, Japan
| | - Yusuke Kawabata
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Yokohama City University, Yokohama City, Kanagawa, Japan
| | - Naomi Kobayashi
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Yokohama City University Medical Center, Yokohama City, Kanagawa, Japan
| | - Yutaka Inaba
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Yokohama City University, Yokohama City, Kanagawa, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Sax FH, Hoyka M, Blersch BP, Fink B. Diagnostics in Late Periprosthetic Infections-Challenges and Solutions. Antibiotics (Basel) 2024; 13:351. [PMID: 38667027 PMCID: PMC11047502 DOI: 10.3390/antibiotics13040351] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/31/2024] [Revised: 04/02/2024] [Accepted: 04/02/2024] [Indexed: 04/29/2024] Open
Abstract
The rising number of arthroplasties is combined with a rising number of periprosthetic joint infections, which leads to life-concerning consequences for the patients, including extended antibiotic treatment, further surgery and increased mortality. The heterogeneity of the symptoms and inflammatory response of the patients due to, e.g., age and comorbidities and the absence of a single diagnostic test with 100% accuracy make it very challenging to choose the right parameters to confirm or deny a periprosthetic joint infection and to establish a standardized definition. In recent years, additional diagnostic possibilities have emerged primarily through the increasing availability of new diagnostic methods, such as genetic techniques. The aim of the review is to provide an overview of the current state of knowledge about the various tests, including the latest developments. The combination of different tests increases the accuracy of the diagnosis. Each physician or clinical department must select the tests from the available methods that can be best implemented for them in organizational and technical terms. Serological parameters and the cultivation of the samples from aspiration or biopsy should be combined with additional synovial tests to create an accurate figure for the failure of the prosthesis, while imaging procedures are used to obtain additional information for the planned therapeutic procedure.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Florian Hubert Sax
- Department of Joint Replacement, General and Rheumatic Orthopaedics, Orthopaedic Clinic Markgröningen gGmbH, Kurt-Lindemann-Weg 10, 71706 Markgröningen, Germany; (F.H.S.); (M.H.); (B.P.B.)
| | - Marius Hoyka
- Department of Joint Replacement, General and Rheumatic Orthopaedics, Orthopaedic Clinic Markgröningen gGmbH, Kurt-Lindemann-Weg 10, 71706 Markgröningen, Germany; (F.H.S.); (M.H.); (B.P.B.)
| | - Benedikt Paul Blersch
- Department of Joint Replacement, General and Rheumatic Orthopaedics, Orthopaedic Clinic Markgröningen gGmbH, Kurt-Lindemann-Weg 10, 71706 Markgröningen, Germany; (F.H.S.); (M.H.); (B.P.B.)
| | - Bernd Fink
- Department of Joint Replacement, General and Rheumatic Orthopaedics, Orthopaedic Clinic Markgröningen gGmbH, Kurt-Lindemann-Weg 10, 71706 Markgröningen, Germany; (F.H.S.); (M.H.); (B.P.B.)
- Orthopaedic Department, University Hospital Hamburg-Eppendorf, Martinistrasse 52, 20246 Hamburg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Esteban J, Salar-Vidal L, Schmitt BH, Waggoner A, Laurent F, Abad L, Bauer TW, Mazariegos I, Balada-Llasat JM, Horn J, Wolk DM, Jefferis A, Hermans M, Verhoofstad I, Butler-Wu SM, Umali-Wilcox M, Murphy C, Cabrera B, Craft D, von Bredow B, Leber A, Everhart K, Dien Bard J, Flores II, Daly J, Barr R, Holmberg K, Graue C, Kensinger B. Multicenter evaluation of the BIOFIRE Joint Infection Panel for the detection of bacteria, yeast, and AMR genes in synovial fluid samples. J Clin Microbiol 2023; 61:e0035723. [PMID: 37877730 PMCID: PMC10662359 DOI: 10.1128/jcm.00357-23] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/23/2023] [Accepted: 09/07/2023] [Indexed: 10/26/2023] Open
Abstract
The bioMérieux BIOFIRE Joint Infection (JI) Panel is a multiplex in vitro diagnostic test for the simultaneous and rapid (~1 h) detection of 39 potential pathogens and antimicrobial resistance (AMR) genes directly from synovial fluid (SF) samples. Thirty-one species or groups of microorganisms are included in the kit, as well as several AMR genes. This study, performed to evaluate the BIOFIRE JI Panel for regulatory clearance, provides data from a multicenter evaluation of 1,544 prospectively collected residual SF samples with performance compared to standard-of-care (SOC) culture for organisms or polymerase chain reaction (PCR) and sequencing for AMR genes. The BIOFIRE JI Panel demonstrated a sensitivity of 90.9% or greater for all but six organisms and a positive percent agreement (PPA) of 100% for all AMR genes. The BIOFIRE JI Panel demonstrated a specificity of 98.5% or greater for detection of all organisms and a negative percent agreement (NPA) of 95.7% or greater for all AMR genes. The BIOFIRE JI Panel provides an improvement over SOC culture, with a substantially shorter time to result for both organisms and AMR genes with excellent sensitivity/PPA and specificity/NPA, and is anticipated to provide timely and actionable diagnostic information for joint infections in a variety of clinical scenarios.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jaime Esteban
- IIS-Fundacion Jimenez Diaz, CIBERINFEC-CIBER de Enfermedades Infecciosas, Madrid, Spain
| | - Llanos Salar-Vidal
- IIS-Fundacion Jimenez Diaz, CIBERINFEC-CIBER de Enfermedades Infecciosas, Madrid, Spain
| | - Bryan H. Schmitt
- Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, Indiana, USA
| | - Amy Waggoner
- Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, Indiana, USA
| | | | | | | | | | | | - Jared Horn
- The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, Ohio, USA
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Caitlin Murphy
- University of Nebraska Medical Center Omaha, Omaha, Nebraska, USA
| | - Barbara Cabrera
- University of Nebraska Medical Center Omaha, Omaha, Nebraska, USA
| | - David Craft
- The Milton S. Hershey Medical Center, Hershey, Pennsylvania, USA
| | | | - Amy Leber
- Nationwide Children’s Hospital, Columbus, Ohio, USA
| | | | | | | | - Judy Daly
- Primary Children’s Hospital, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA
| | - Rebecca Barr
- Primary Children’s Hospital, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
8
|
Tsikopoulos K, Meroni G. Periprosthetic Joint Infection Diagnosis: A Narrative Review. Antibiotics (Basel) 2023; 12:1485. [PMID: 37887186 PMCID: PMC10604393 DOI: 10.3390/antibiotics12101485] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/27/2023] [Revised: 09/20/2023] [Accepted: 09/25/2023] [Indexed: 10/28/2023] Open
Abstract
Replacement of native joints aims to restore patients' quality of life by relieving pain and improving joint function. While periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) affects a small percentage of patients, with an estimated incidence of 1-9% following primary total joint replacement, this postoperative complication necessitates a lengthy hospitalisation, extended antibiotic treatment and further surgery. It is highlighted that establishing the correct diagnosis of periprosthetic infections is critical in order for clinicians to avoid unnecessary treatments in patients with aseptic failure. Of note, the PJI diagnosis could not purely rely upon clinical manifestations given the fact that heterogeneity in host factors (e.g., age and comorbidities), variability in infection period, difference in anatomical location of the involved joint and discrepancies in pathogenicity/virulence of the causative organisms may confound the clinical picture. Furthermore, intra-operative contamination is considered to be the main culprit that can result in early or delayed infection, with the hematogenous spread being the most prevalent mode. To elaborate, early and hematogenous infections often start suddenly, whereas chronic late infections are induced by less virulent bacteria and tend to manifest in a more quiescent manner. Last but not least, viruses and fungal microorganisms exert a role in PJI pathogenesis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Konstantinos Tsikopoulos
- 1st Department of Pharmacology, School of Medicine, Faculty of Health Sciences, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, 54124 Thessaloniki, Greece
| | - Gabriele Meroni
- One Health Unit, Department of Biomedical, Surgical and Dental Sciences, School of Medicine, University of Milan, 20133 Milan, Italy;
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Yilmaz MK, Abbaszadeh A, Tarabichi S, Azboy I, Parvizi J. Diagnosis of Periprosthetic Joint Infection: The Utility of Biomarkers in 2023. Antibiotics (Basel) 2023; 12:1054. [PMID: 37370373 DOI: 10.3390/antibiotics12061054] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/23/2023] [Revised: 06/11/2023] [Accepted: 06/12/2023] [Indexed: 06/29/2023] Open
Abstract
Periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) is a rare yet devastating complication following total joint arthroplasty (TJA). Early and accurate diagnosis of PJI is paramount in order to maximize the chances of successful treatment. However, we are yet to identify a single "gold standard" test for the diagnosis of PJI. As a result, the diagnosis of PJI is often challenging. Currently, the 2018 ICM definition of PJI is the only validated diagnostic criteria available. This article will review the importance of serum and synovial biomarkers in the diagnosis of PJI. In addition, it will provide a brief overview of the emerging modalities for the identification of infections in this setting.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mehmet Kursat Yilmaz
- Rothman Orthopaedic Institute, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA 19107, USA
- Department of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, School of Medicine, Istanbul Medipol University, Istanbul 34810, Turkey
| | - Ahmad Abbaszadeh
- Rothman Orthopaedic Institute, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA 19107, USA
| | - Saad Tarabichi
- Rothman Orthopaedic Institute, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA 19107, USA
| | - Ibrahim Azboy
- Department of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, School of Medicine, Istanbul Medipol University, Istanbul 34810, Turkey
| | - Javad Parvizi
- Rothman Orthopaedic Institute, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA 19107, USA
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Braams L, Vlaspolder G, Boiten K, Salomon E, Winter R, Saleem B, Wouthuyzen-Bakker M, van Oosten M. Sonication of Vascular Grafts and Endografts to Diagnose Vascular Graft Infection: a Head-To-Head Comparison with Conventional Culture and Its Clinical Impact. Microbiol Spectr 2023; 11:e0372222. [PMID: 36847571 PMCID: PMC10100911 DOI: 10.1128/spectrum.03722-22] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/27/2022] [Accepted: 02/09/2023] [Indexed: 03/01/2023] Open
Abstract
Vascular graft and endograft infection (VGEI) is a severe complication associated with high mortality and is often challenging to diagnose. For the definitive microbiological diagnosis, sonication of vascular grafts may increase the microbiological yield of these biofilm-associated infections. The objective of this study was to determine whether sonication of explanted vascular grafts and endografts results in a higher diagnostic accuracy than conventional culture methods and aids in clinical decision-making. A prospective diagnostic study was performed comparing conventional culture with sonication culture of explanted vascular grafts in patients treated for VGEI. Explanted (endo)grafts were cut in halves and were either subjected to sonication or conventional culture. Criteria based on the Management of Aortic Graft Infection Collaboration (MAGIC) case definition of VGEI were used for definitive diagnosis. The relevance of sonication cultures was assessed by expert opinion to determine the clinical impact on decision-making. Fifty-seven vascular (endo)graft samples from 36 patients (four reoperations; 40 episodes) treated for VGEI were included; 32 episodes were diagnosed with VGEI. Both methods showed a positive culture in 81% of the cases. However, sonication culture detected clinically relevant microorganisms that went unnoticed by conventional culturing in 9 out of 57 samples (16%, 8 episodes) and provided additional relevant information regarding growth densities in another 11 samples (19%, 10 episodes). Sonication of explanted vascular grafts and endografts improves the microbiological yield and aids in the clinical decision-making for patients with a suspected VGEI compared to conventional culture alone. IMPORTANCE Sonication culture of explanted vascular grafts was shown to be a noninferior method compared to conventional culturing in diagnosing vascular graft and endograft infection (VGEI). Moreover, sonication culture has probable additional value in microbiological characterization of VGEI by giving more detailed information on growth densities, especially when the conventional culture shows intermediate growth. In this prospective design, for the first time, a direct comparison is made between sonication culturing and conventional culturing in VGEI, while taking clinical interpretation into account. Therefore, this study is another step toward a more accurate microbiological diagnosis of VGEI, influencing clinical decision-making.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lisanne Braams
- Department of Medical Microbiology and Infection Prevention, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands
| | - Gro Vlaspolder
- Department of Medical Microbiology and Infection Prevention, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands
| | - Kathleen Boiten
- Department of Medical Microbiology and Infection Prevention, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands
| | - Elisa Salomon
- Department of Medical Microbiology and Infection Prevention, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands
| | - Rik Winter
- Department of Medical Microbiology and Infection Prevention, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands
| | - Ben Saleem
- Division of Vascular Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands
| | - Marjan Wouthuyzen-Bakker
- Department of Medical Microbiology and Infection Prevention, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands
| | - Marleen van Oosten
- Department of Medical Microbiology and Infection Prevention, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Advances in the Microbiological Diagnosis of Prosthetic Joint Infections. Diagnostics (Basel) 2023; 13:diagnostics13040809. [PMID: 36832297 PMCID: PMC9954824 DOI: 10.3390/diagnostics13040809] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 11.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/04/2023] [Revised: 01/31/2023] [Accepted: 02/17/2023] [Indexed: 02/25/2023] Open
Abstract
A significant number of prosthetic joint infections (PJI) are culture-negative and/or misinterpreted as aseptic failures in spite of the correct implementation of diagnostic culture techniques, such as tissue sample processing in a bead mill, prolonged incubation time, or sonication of removed implants. Misinterpretation may lead to unnecessary surgery and needless antimicrobial treatment. The diagnostic value of non-culture techniques has been investigated in synovial fluid, periprosthetic tissues, and sonication fluid. Different feasible improvements, such as real-time technology, automated systems and commercial kits are now available to support microbiologists. In this review, we describe non-culture techniques based on nucleic acid amplification and sequencing methods. Polymerase chain reaction (PCR) is a frequently used technique in most microbiology laboratories which allows the detection of a nucleic acid fragment by sequence amplification. Different PCR types can be used to diagnose PJI, each one requiring the selection of appropriate primers. Henceforward, thanks to the reduced cost of sequencing and the availability of next-generation sequencing (NGS), it will be possible to identify the whole pathogen genome sequence and, additionally, to detect all the pathogen sequences present in the joint. Although these new techniques have proved helpful, strict conditions need to be observed in order to detect fastidious microorganisms and rule out contaminants. Specialized microbiologists should assist clinicians in interpreting the result of the analyses at interdisciplinary meetings. New technologies will gradually be made available to improve the etiologic diagnoses of PJI, which will remain an important cornerstone of treatment. Strong collaboration among all specialists involved is essential for the correct diagnosis of PJI.
Collapse
|
12
|
Molecular Diagnosis of Osteoarticular Implant-Associated Infection: Available Techniques and How We Can Use Them. PROSTHESIS 2022. [DOI: 10.3390/prosthesis5010001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/31/2022]
Abstract
Despite recent advances during the last few years, microbiological diagnosis of prosthetic joint infections remains a challenge. Molecular biology techniques have been developed to try to overcome this problem, and recently, many of them have become available for many laboratories. Some of them, especially commercial multiplex PCR-based assays and universal 16S rDNA homemade PCR assays, are now available in many laboratories. Moreover, new technologies have appeared, especially metagenomics and next-generation sequencing. These techniques have demonstrated their potential in many studies but appear to be experimental at present. A few studies have evaluated the possible use of these methods in the clinical routine, and a review of the critical aspects for the selection of a molecular method (accuracy, complexity, cost) was performed. Finally, a proposal for a protocol that includes molecular biology techniques was made according to the literature published in this field. In conclusion, molecular biology techniques are ready to be used in the clinical routine of a microbiology laboratory, but their use must be carried out in accordance with the many special characteristics of each laboratory. In all cases, the interpretation of the results must be conducted by a multidisciplinary team with experience in the management of these patients.
Collapse
|
13
|
Comparison of the BioFire Joint Infection Panel to 16S Ribosomal RNA Gene-Based Targeted Metagenomic Sequencing for Testing Synovial Fluid from Patients with Knee Arthroplasty Failure. J Clin Microbiol 2022; 60:e0112622. [PMID: 36409108 PMCID: PMC9769560 DOI: 10.1128/jcm.01126-22] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/23/2022] Open
Abstract
The diagnosis of periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) is challenging, often requiring multiple clinical specimens and diagnostic techniques, some with prolonged result turnaround times. Here, the diagnostic performance of the Investigational Use Only (IUO) BioFire Joint Infection (JI) Panel was compared to 16S rRNA gene-based targeted metagenomic sequencing (tMGS) applied to synovial fluid for PJI diagnosis. Sixty synovial fluid samples from knee arthroplasty failure archived at -80°C were tested. Infectious Diseases Society of America (IDSA) diagnostic criteria were used to classify PJI. For culture-positive PJI with pathogens targeted by the JI panel, JI panel sensitivity was 91% (21/23; 95% confidence interval [CI], 73 to 98%), and tMGS sensitivity was 96% (23/24; 95% CI, 80 to 99%) (P = 0.56). Overall sensitivities of the JI panel and tMGS for PJI diagnosis were 56% (24/43; 95% CI, 41 to 70%) and 93% (41/44; 95% CI, 82 to 98%), respectively (P < 0.001). JI panel and tMGS overall specificities were 100% (16/16; 95% CI, 81 to 100%) and 94% (15/16; 95% CI, 72 to 99%), respectively. While the clinical sensitivity of the JI panel was excellent for on-panel microorganisms, overall sensitivity for PJI diagnosis was low due to the absence of Staphylococcus epidermidis, a common causative pathogen of PJI, on the panel. A PJI diagnostic algorithm for the use of both molecular tests is proposed.
Collapse
|
14
|
Mian HM, Lyons JG, Perrin J, Froehle AW, Krishnamurthy AB. A review of current practices in periprosthetic joint infection debridement and revision arthroplasty. ARTHROPLASTY 2022; 4:31. [PMID: 36045436 PMCID: PMC9434893 DOI: 10.1186/s42836-022-00136-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/14/2022] [Accepted: 06/09/2022] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Periprosthetic joint infection remains a significant challenge for arthroplasty surgeons globally. Over the last few decades, there has been much advancement in terms of treatment and diagnosis, however, the fight rages on. As management of periprosthetic joint infections continues to evolve, it is critical to reflect back on current debridement practices to establish common ground as well as identify areas for future research and improvement. BODY: In order to understand the debridement techniques of periprosthetic joint infections, one must also understand how to diagnose a periprosthetic joint infection. Multiple definitions have been elucidated over the years with no single consensus established but rather sets of criteria. Once a diagnosis has been established the decision of debridement method becomes whether to proceed with single vs two-stage revision based on the probability of infection as well as individual patient factors. After much study, two-stage revision has emerged as the gold standard in the management of periprosthetic infections but single-stage remains prominent with further and further research. CONCLUSION Despite decades of data, there is no single treatment algorithm for periprosthetic joint infections and subsequent debridement technique. Our review touches on the goals of debridement while providing a perspective as to diagnosis and the particulars of how intraoperative factors such as intraarticular irrigation can play pivotal roles in infection eradication. By providing a perspective on current debridement practices, we hope to encourage future study and debate on how to address periprosthetic joint infections best.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Humza M Mian
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Wright State University Boonshoft School of Medicine, 30 E. Apple St. Suite #2200, Dayton, OH, 45409, USA.
| | - Joseph G Lyons
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Wright State University Boonshoft School of Medicine, 30 E. Apple St. Suite #2200, Dayton, OH, 45409, USA
| | - Joshua Perrin
- Wright State University Boonshoft School of Medicine, Wright State Physicians Bldg, 725 University Blvd., Dayton, OH, 45435, USA
| | - Andrew W Froehle
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Wright State University Boonshoft School of Medicine, 30 E. Apple St. Suite #2200, Dayton, OH, 45409, USA
- School of Nursing, Kinesiology and Health, Wright State University, 3640 Colonel Glenn Hwy., Dayton, OH, 45435, USA
| | - Anil B Krishnamurthy
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Wright State University Boonshoft School of Medicine, 30 E. Apple St. Suite #2200, Dayton, OH, 45409, USA
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Tan J, Liu Y, Ehnert S, Nüssler AK, Yu Y, Xu J, Chen T. The Effectiveness of Metagenomic Next-Generation Sequencing in the Diagnosis of Prosthetic Joint Infection: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Front Cell Infect Microbiol 2022; 12:875822. [PMID: 35755833 PMCID: PMC9226560 DOI: 10.3389/fcimb.2022.875822] [Citation(s) in RCA: 24] [Impact Index Per Article: 12.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/14/2022] [Accepted: 05/11/2022] [Indexed: 12/02/2022] Open
Abstract
Background A prosthetic joint infection (PJI) is a devastating complication following total joint arthroplasties with poor prognosis. Identifying an accurate and prompt diagnostic method is particularly important for PJI. Recently, the diagnostic value of metagenomic next-generation sequencing (mNGS) in detecting PJI has attracted much attention, while the evidence of its accuracy is quite limited. Thus, this study aimed to evaluate the accuracy of mNGS for the diagnosis of PJI. Methods We summarized published studies to identify the potential diagnostic value of mNGS for PJI patients by searching online databases using keywords such as “prosthetic joint infection”, “PJI”, and “metagenomic sequencing”. Ten of 380 studies with 955 patients in total were included. The included studies provided sufficient data for the completion of 2-by-2 tables. We calculated the sensitivity, specificity, and area under the SROC curve (AUC) to evaluate mNGS for PJI diagnosis. Results We found that the pooled diagnostic sensitivity and specificity of mNGS for PJI were 0.93 (95% CI, 0.83 to 0.97) and 0.95 (95% CI, 0.92 to 0.97), respectively. Positive and negative likelihood ratios were 18.3 (95% CI, 10.9 to 30.6) and 0.07 (95% CI, 0.03 to 0.18), respectively. The area under the curve was 0.96 (95% CI, 0.93 to 0.97). Conclusion Metagenomic next-generation sequencing displays high accuracy in the diagnosis of PJI, especially for culture-negative cases.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jun Tan
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, China
| | - Yang Liu
- Department of Clinical Sciences, Orthopedics, Faculty of Medicine, Lund University, Lund, Sweden
| | - Sabrina Ehnert
- Department of Trauma and Reconstructive Surgery, BG Trauma Center Tübingen, Siegfried Weller Institute for Trauma Research, Eberhard Karls University Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany
| | - Andreas K Nüssler
- Department of Trauma and Reconstructive Surgery, BG Trauma Center Tübingen, Siegfried Weller Institute for Trauma Research, Eberhard Karls University Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany
| | - Yang Yu
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, China
| | - Jianzhong Xu
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, China
| | - Tao Chen
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, China
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Aliyev O, Yıldız F, Kaya HB, Aghazada A, Sümbül B, Citak M, Tuncay İ. Sonication of explants enhances the diagnostic accuracy of synovial fluid and tissue cultures and can help determine the appropriate antibiotic therapy for prosthetic joint infections. INTERNATIONAL ORTHOPAEDICS 2022; 46:415-422. [DOI: 10.1007/s00264-021-05286-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/27/2021] [Accepted: 12/13/2021] [Indexed: 01/04/2023]
|
17
|
Auñón Á, Coifman I, Blanco A, García Cañete J, Parrón-Cambero R, Esteban J. Usefulness of a Multiplex PCR Assay for the Diagnosis of Prosthetic Joint Infections in the Routine Setting. Orthop Surg 2022; 14:383-388. [PMID: 34978153 PMCID: PMC8867406 DOI: 10.1111/os.13187] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/05/2020] [Revised: 11/14/2021] [Accepted: 11/19/2021] [Indexed: 12/01/2022] Open
Abstract
Objective To evaluate the usefulness of a multiplex polymerase chain reaction (PCR) assay as a complementary tool in the diagnosis of prosthetic joint infections in the routine setting of a clinical microbiology laboratory, with a special focus on patients at high risk of culture‐negative infections and high suspicion of infection. Methods The results obtained in the routine care setting with the use of the commercial multiplex PCR (Unyvero i60©, Curetis AG, Holzgerlingen, Germany) were retrospectively reviewed. The test was performed in samples of patients with suspected prosthetic joint infection, which were also processed for conventional diagnostic methods, including sonication of the implant when possible. Patients selected for the test were those with negative cultures after a 24‐h incubation period. Results Ninety‐nine PCRs were performed, 57 of which were diagnostic of infection according to 2018 MSIS criteria. Nine patients received antibiotics within the 15 days prior to the diagnostic procedure. Tested samples included synovial fluid (33), sonication fluid (56) and tissue biopsies (10). The PCR test detected microorganisms in 26 samples: including two cases of polymicrobial infection. Eleven patients were diagnosed by using PCR only. The most frequently detected microorganism in PCR was Coagulase‐Negative Staphylococcus in 11 samples, followed by Staphylococcus aureus in five. One sample was positive for the bacteria universal primer, included in the 2.0 version of the kit. Only one discrepancy was detected between a negative PCR and a positive culture. One sample was also positive for a resistance marker (detection of mecA gene in a case of methicillin‐resistant S. aureus infection). Conclusion The incorporation of the Unyvero ITI multiple PCR technique in patients selected by clinical experts is a useful tool for the diagnosis of bone and joint infections in a routine care setting. A close clinical‐microbiological collaboration improves the usefulness of this kit for the management of patients with these infections.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Álvaro Auñón
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Bone and Joint Infection Unit, IIS-Fundacion Jimenez Diaz, Madrid, Spain.,Networking Research Centre on Infectious Diseases (CIBER de Enfermedades Infecciosas), Madrid, Spain
| | - Ismael Coifman
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Bone and Joint Infection Unit, IIS-Fundacion Jimenez Diaz, Madrid, Spain
| | - Antonio Blanco
- Networking Research Centre on Infectious Diseases (CIBER de Enfermedades Infecciosas), Madrid, Spain.,Internal Medicine-Emergencies, Bone and Joint Infection Unit, IIS-Fundacion Jimenez Diaz, Madrid, Spain
| | - Joaquín García Cañete
- Internal Medicine-Emergencies, Bone and Joint Infection Unit, IIS-Fundacion Jimenez Diaz, Madrid, Spain
| | - Raúl Parrón-Cambero
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Bone and Joint Infection Unit, IIS-Fundacion Jimenez Diaz, Madrid, Spain.,Networking Research Centre on Infectious Diseases (CIBER de Enfermedades Infecciosas), Madrid, Spain
| | - Jaime Esteban
- Networking Research Centre on Infectious Diseases (CIBER de Enfermedades Infecciosas), Madrid, Spain.,Clinical Microbiology, Bone and Joint Infection Unit, IIS-Fundacion Jimenez Diaz, Madrid, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Oliva A, Miele MC, Al Ismail D, Di Timoteo F, De Angelis M, Rosa L, Cutone A, Venditti M, Mascellino MT, Valenti P, Mastroianni CM. Challenges in the Microbiological Diagnosis of Implant-Associated Infections: A Summary of the Current Knowledge. Front Microbiol 2021; 12:750460. [PMID: 34777301 PMCID: PMC8586543 DOI: 10.3389/fmicb.2021.750460] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/30/2021] [Accepted: 10/04/2021] [Indexed: 12/14/2022] Open
Abstract
Implant-associated infections are characterized by microbial biofilm formation on implant surface, which renders the microbiological diagnosis challenging and requires, in the majority of cases, a complete device removal along with a prolonged antimicrobial therapy. Traditional cultures have shown unsatisfactory sensitivity and a significant advance in the field has been represented by both the application of the sonication technique for the detachment of live bacteria from biofilm and the implementation of metabolic and molecular assays. However, despite the recent progresses in the microbiological diagnosis have considerably reduced the rate of culture-negative infections, still their reported incidence is not negligible. Overall, several culture- and non-culture based methods have been developed for diagnosis optimization, which mostly relies on pre-operative and intra-operative (i.e., removed implants and surrounding tissues) samples. This review outlines the principal culture- and non-culture based methods for the diagnosis of the causative agents of implant-associated infections and gives an overview on their application in the clinical practice. Furthermore, advantages and disadvantages of each method are described.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alessandra Oliva
- Department of Public Health and Infectious Diseases, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy
| | - Maria Claudia Miele
- Department of Public Health and Infectious Diseases, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy
| | - Dania Al Ismail
- Department of Public Health and Infectious Diseases, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy
| | - Federica Di Timoteo
- Department of Public Health and Infectious Diseases, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy
| | - Massimiliano De Angelis
- Department of Public Health and Infectious Diseases, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy
| | - Luigi Rosa
- Department of Public Health and Infectious Diseases, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy
| | - Antimo Cutone
- Department of Biosciences and Territory, University of Molise, Pesche, Italy
| | - Mario Venditti
- Department of Public Health and Infectious Diseases, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy
| | - Maria Teresa Mascellino
- Department of Public Health and Infectious Diseases, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy
| | - Piera Valenti
- Department of Public Health and Infectious Diseases, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy
| | | |
Collapse
|
19
|
Diagnostic accuracy of multiplex polymerase chain reaction on tissue biopsies in periprosthetic joint infections. Sci Rep 2021; 11:19487. [PMID: 34593961 PMCID: PMC8484603 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-021-99076-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/15/2021] [Accepted: 09/15/2021] [Indexed: 11/08/2022] Open
Abstract
The diagnosis and treatment of periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) currently relies on cultures, which are time-consuming and often fail. Multiplex PCR assays promise reliable and prompt results, but have been heterogeneously evaluated. In this study, we analyse multiplex PCR in pathogen identification using only tissue biopsies. 42 patients after revision arthroplasty of the hip or knee were evaluated using multiplex PCR to identify microorganisms. The patients were classified according to the diagnostic criteria published by Zimmerli et al. and the results were compared to the respective microbiological cultures. PJI was detected in 15 patients and 27 revisions were aseptic. The multiplex PCR of tissue biopsies had a sensitivity of 0.3 (95% CI 0.12-0.62), a specificity of 1.0 (0.87-1.0), a positive predictive value of 1.0 (0.48-1.0) and a negative predictive value of 0.73 (0.56-0.86). The diagnostic accuracy of multiplex PCR on tissue biopsy samples is low in comparison to routine microbiological cultures. The evaluation of tissue biopsies using multiplex PCR was prone to false negative results. However, multiplex PCR assays have the advantage of rapid pathogen identification. We therefore recommend further investigation of multiplex PCR in the setting of suspected PJI with a careful choice of specimens.
Collapse
|
20
|
Liu X, Jiang N, Wang T, Yu B. Serum and Synovial Biomarkers for the Diagnosis of Implant-Associated Infection After Orthopedic Surgery. Orthopedics 2021; 44:e158-e166. [PMID: 33416900 DOI: 10.3928/01477447-20210104-07] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/03/2023]
Abstract
Implant-associated infection is one of the most devastating complications following orthopedic surgery. Early identification is crucial for treatment. Currently, however, a reliable diagnostic tool is lacking, partly due to disparate bacteria colonies (virulent vs non-virulent), difficulty in distinguishing infection from inflammatory disease, and highly diverse diagnostic thresholds and testing methods. Given the importance of biomarkers in the initial screening for the infection, an extensive effort has been made to develop serum and synovial biomarkers. In this review, the authors summarize the results from the most relevant studies to provide comprehensive information on biomarkers for the diagnosis of implant-associated infection. [Orthopedics. 2021;44(2):e158-e166.].
Collapse
|
21
|
Zhang Q, Ding B, Wu J, Dong J, Liu F. Sonication fluid culture of antibiotic-loaded bone cement spacer has high accuracy to confirm eradication of infection before reimplantation of new prostheses. J Orthop Surg Res 2021; 16:377. [PMID: 34120643 PMCID: PMC8199841 DOI: 10.1186/s13018-021-02520-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/28/2021] [Accepted: 06/02/2021] [Indexed: 02/08/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Sonication fluid culture of antibiotic-loaded bone cement spacer has been used to predict reinfection of two-stage revision, but its value remains disputable. This study aims to evaluate the association between the culture result of the sonicated spacer and the status of patients with periprosthetic joint infection receiving two-stage revision. MATERIALS AND METHODS A comprehensive electronic literature search was performed through four databases including PubMed, Embase/Ovid, and EBSCO, and the Cochrane Library to retrieve studies in which sonication fluid culture of the antibiotic spacer was conducted before reimplantation. The pooled sensitivity, specificity, positive likelihood ratio (PLR), negative likelihood ratio (NLR), and diagnostic odds ratio (DOR) were calculated to assess the association between the culture result of sonicated spacer and prognosis of the two-stage revision. RESULTS Eleven eligible studies comprising 603 artificial joints with PJI (134 suffering a clinical failure of two-stage revision) were included in the quantitative analysis. The pooled incidences of positive culture of sonicated spacer and intraoperative tissue were 0.14 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.08-0.21) and 0.14 (95% CI 0.08-0.20), respectively. A positive culture of sonicated antibiotic-loaded bone cement spacer illustrated moderate sensitivity (0.31, 95% CI 0.13-0.58) but high specificity (0.94, 95% CI 0.86-0.98) for the diagnosis of therapeutic failure of two-stage revision; the pooled DOR was 7.67 (95% CI, 3.63-16.22). Meanwhile, the pooled sensitivity, specificity, and DOR of intraoperative tissue culture during the two-stage revision to predict therapeutic failure were 0.32 (95% CI, 0.20-0.47), 0.96 (95% CI, 0.92-0.98), and 10.62 (95% CI, 4.90-23.01), respectively. CONCLUSIONS Sonication fluid culture of antibiotic-loaded bone cement spacer revealed high accuracy for confirming eradication of infection before reimplantation of new prostheses and therefore could be used as a supplement for assessing therapeutic effect for PJI. However, both sonication fluid culture and intraoperative tissue culture from antibiotic-loaded bone cement spacer showed restricted yield for the prediction of a septic failure after the two-stage revision of PJI. Large-scale, prospective studies are still needed to testify current findings.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Qingyu Zhang
- Department of Orthopedics, Shandong Provincial Hospital affiliated to Shandong First Medical University, No.324, Road Jing Wu Wei Qi, Jinan, 250021, Shandong, China
| | - Baocong Ding
- Rehabilitation Department, Shandong University of Traditional Chinese Medicine Affiliated Hospital, No.16369, Road Jing Shi, Jinan, 250014, Shandong, China
| | - Jinglin Wu
- Basic Course Department, Weihai Vocational College, New Sci-Tech Park of Beihai, Weihai, 264200, Shandong, China
| | - Jun Dong
- Department of Orthopedics, Shandong Provincial Hospital affiliated to Shandong First Medical University, No.324, Road Jing Wu Wei Qi, Jinan, 250021, Shandong, China
| | - Fanxiao Liu
- Department of Orthopedics, Shandong Provincial Hospital affiliated to Shandong First Medical University, No.324, Road Jing Wu Wei Qi, Jinan, 250021, Shandong, China.
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Li C, Ojeda-Thies C, Xu C, Trampuz A. Meta-analysis in periprosthetic joint infection: a global bibliometric analysis. J Orthop Surg Res 2020; 15:251. [PMID: 32650802 PMCID: PMC7350679 DOI: 10.1186/s13018-020-01757-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/19/2020] [Accepted: 06/16/2020] [Indexed: 02/07/2023] Open
Abstract
Background Periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) is the most serious complication of joint replacement surgery. Further comorbidities include bedsore, deep vein thrombosis, reinfection, or even death. An increasing number of researchers are focusing on this challenging complication. The aim of the present study was to estimate global PJI research based on bibliometrics from meta-analysis studies. Methods A database search was performed in PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science. Relevant studies were assessed using the bibliometric analysis. Results A total of 117 articles were included. The most relevant literature on PJI was found on Scopus. China made the highest contributions to global research, followed by the USA and the UK. The institution with the most contributions was the University of Bristol. The journal with the highest number of publications was The Journal of Arthroplasty, whereas the Journal of Clinical Medicine had the shortest acceptance time. Furthermore, the top three frequently used databases were Embase, MEDLINE, and Cochrane. The most frequent number of authors in meta-analysis studies was four. Most studies focused on the periprosthetic hip and knee. The alpha-defensin diagnostic test, preventive measures on antibiotics use, and risk factors of intra-articular steroid injections were the most popular topic in recent years. Conclusion Based on the results of the present study, we found that there was no single database that covered all relevant articles; the optimal method for bibliometric analysis is a combination of databases. The most popular research topics on PJI focused on alpha-defensin, antibiotic use, risk factors of intra-articular steroid injections, and the location of prosthetic hip and knee infection.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Cheng Li
- Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health, Center for Musculoskeletal Surgery (CMSC), Charitéplatz 1, D-10117, Berlin, Germany
| | | | - Chi Xu
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, General Hospital of People's Liberation Army, Beijing, People's Republic of China
| | - Andrej Trampuz
- Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health, Center for Musculoskeletal Surgery (CMSC), Charitéplatz 1, D-10117, Berlin, Germany.
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
How to Diagnose Surgical Site Infection After Fracture Surgery: We Have a Problem! Tech Orthop 2020. [DOI: 10.1097/bto.0000000000000462] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
|
24
|
Suren C, Feihl S, Cabric S, Banke IJ, Haller B, Trampuz A, von Eisenhart-Rothe R, Prodinger PM. Improved pre-operative diagnostic accuracy for low-grade prosthetic joint infections using second-generation multiplex Polymerase chain reaction on joint fluid aspirate. INTERNATIONAL ORTHOPAEDICS 2020; 44:1629-1637. [PMID: 32296908 PMCID: PMC7452934 DOI: 10.1007/s00264-020-04552-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/20/2019] [Accepted: 03/26/2020] [Indexed: 12/19/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND A major obstacle for the treatment of prosthetic joint infection (PJI) is the identification of the underlying causative organism. While the diagnostic criteria ruling PJI in or out have become ever more accurate, the detection of the causative pathogen(s) still relies mostly on conventional and time-consuming microbial culture. The aim of this study was to evaluate the diagnostic potential of a second-generation multiplex PCR assay (Unyvero ITI G2, Curetis AG, Holzgerlingen, Germany) used on synovial fluid specimens. Our hypothesis was that the method would yield a higher diagnostic accuracy in the pre-operative workup than synovial fluid culture. Thus, a more precise classification of septic and aseptic prosthesis failure could be achieved before revision surgery. METHODS Prospectively collected frozen joint fluid specimens from 26 patients undergoing arthroplasty revision surgery of the hip or knee were tested as per the manufacturer's protocol. Sensitivities, specificities, positive and negative predictive values as well as positive and negative likelihood ratios with corresponding confidence intervals were estimated using the statistical software R. A combination of the serum C-reactive protein (CRP) level, leukocyte count, erythrocyte sedimentation rate, joint fluid culture, tissue biopsy culture, and tissue biopsy histology served as the gold standard. RESULTS Of the 26 patients included in the study, 15 were infected and 11 were aseptic. Conventional joint fluid culture showed a sensitivity of 0.67 and a specificity of 0.91. Joint fluid multiplex PCR yielded a sensitivity of 0.8 and a specificity of 1.0. CONCLUSIONS Using the second-generation Unyvero ITI cartridge on joint fluid aspirate for the detection of prosthetic joint infection, we were able to achieve a higher diagnostic accuracy than with conventional culture. We conclude that to improve pathogen detection before revision surgery, this method represents a valuable and practicable tool.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Christian Suren
- Klinik und Poliklinik für Orthopädie und Sportorthopädie, Klinikum rechts der Isar der Technischen Universität München, Ismaninger Str. 22, 81675, Munich, Germany.
| | - Susanne Feihl
- Institut für Medizinische Mikrobiologie, Immunologie und Hygiene, Technische Universität München, Trogerstr. 30, 81675, Munich, Germany
| | - Sabrina Cabric
- Centrum für Muskuloskeletale Chirurgie (CMSC), Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Charitéplatz 1, 10117, Berlin, Germany
| | - Ingo J Banke
- Klinik und Poliklinik für Orthopädie und Sportorthopädie, Klinikum rechts der Isar der Technischen Universität München, Ismaninger Str. 22, 81675, Munich, Germany
| | - Bernhard Haller
- Institut für medizinische Informatik, Statistik und Epidemiologie, Technische Universität München, Grillparzerstr. 18, 81675, Munich, Germany
| | - Andrej Trampuz
- Centrum für Muskuloskeletale Chirurgie (CMSC), Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Charitéplatz 1, 10117, Berlin, Germany
| | - Rüdiger von Eisenhart-Rothe
- Klinik und Poliklinik für Orthopädie und Sportorthopädie, Klinikum rechts der Isar der Technischen Universität München, Ismaninger Str. 22, 81675, Munich, Germany
| | - Peter M Prodinger
- Klinik und Poliklinik für Orthopädie und Sportorthopädie, Klinikum rechts der Isar der Technischen Universität München, Ismaninger Str. 22, 81675, Munich, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Apostolakis S. Use of Focused Ultrasound (Sonication) for the Diagnosis of Infections in Neurosurgical Operations: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. World Neurosurg 2020; 136:364-373.e2. [PMID: 31899387 DOI: 10.1016/j.wneu.2019.12.143] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/04/2019] [Revised: 12/22/2019] [Accepted: 12/23/2019] [Indexed: 10/25/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Postoperative infections are one of the most devastating complications in neurosurgery, and their results are even more disastrous when biocompatible implants are involved. As the application of these implants increases, the need for a sensitive and efficient method to detect pathogens becomes imperative. The application of sonication appears to be a viable option. METHODS A systematic review and meta-analysis of the available literature was conducted, looking for studies reporting findings from the application of sonication following neurosurgical operations. To be included, an article needed to contain information about the material that was subjected to sonication, indication of other culture methods that were applied, and information about the isolated pathogens. RESULTS Six studies comprising 437 patients were included in the meta-analysis. Potential superiority of sonication over conventional microbiologic methods was found in the detection of gram-positive bacteria and in particular of coagulase-negative Staphylococcus species. A sensitivity of 0.87 and a specificity of 0.57 were calculated. CONCLUSIONS Regardless of the potential of sonication, it is still not a panacea. Additional studies are expected to provide significant insight into the indications and limitations of this technique.
Collapse
|
26
|
Performance of Sequencing Assays in Diagnosis of Prosthetic Joint Infection: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. J Arthroplasty 2019; 34:1514-1522.e4. [PMID: 31005434 DOI: 10.1016/j.arth.2019.02.044] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/09/2018] [Revised: 02/08/2019] [Accepted: 02/20/2019] [Indexed: 02/05/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND A prompt, accurate diagnosis of prosthetic joint infection (PJI) allows early treatment, and with identification of the causative organism, sensitive antibiotics could be applied. However, routine methods cannot identify the causative organism under certain circumstances. Gene sequencing assays have unique superiority in promptness and broad coverage of pathogens, but evidence of its accuracy is quite limited. METHODS Of 247 citations identified for screening, 12 studies with 1965 patients in total were included. The diagnostic value of sequencing assays in PJI was systematically reviewed. Subgroup analysis was conducted to explore the source of heterogeneity. RESULTS Pooled sensitivity was 0.81 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.73-0.87); pooled specificity was 0.94 (95% CI, 0.91-0.97); positive likelihood ratio was 14.2 (95% CI, 8.7-23.4); negative likelihood ratio was 0.20 (95% CI, 0.14-0.29); and the area under the curve was 0.94 (95% CI, 0.18-1.00). The results of subgroup analysis revealed that antibiotics reduced the sensitivity of sequencing-based diagnosis compared with withholding antibiotics before sampling (0.71 vs 0.94). In another subgroup analysis, sequencing by synthesis (Illumina sequencing) had better specificity than other next-generation sequencing methods (0.963 vs 0.829) and specificity similar to time-consuming and laborious Sanger sequencing (0.963 vs 0.967). CONCLUSION Sequencing assays had favorable diagnostic accuracy of PJI. When sequencing assays were applied to diagnosing PJI, an antibiotic-free interval before sampling may enhance the ability to detect the causative organism and, among next-generation sequencing methods, sequencing by synthesis seemed to have advantages over other methods in specificity.
Collapse
|
27
|
General Assembly, Diagnosis, Pathogen Isolation: Proceedings of International Consensus on Orthopedic Infections. J Arthroplasty 2019; 34:S207-S214. [PMID: 30348573 DOI: 10.1016/j.arth.2018.09.072] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/01/2023] Open
|