1
|
Ye Y, Su Z, Shi C. Institutional trust, scientific literacy, and information sources: What factors determine people's attitudes toward COVID-19 vaccines of different origins in China? Front Public Health 2023; 11:1092425. [PMID: 36891334 PMCID: PMC9986272 DOI: 10.3389/fpubh.2023.1092425] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/09/2022] [Accepted: 01/26/2023] [Indexed: 02/22/2023] Open
Abstract
Objective This study aimed to investigate the different attitudes of Chinese residents toward COVID-19 vaccines produced in China and the United States in an emergency context, and then explored possible explanations for these different attitudes. Methods Using data collected online in May 2021, we compared Chinese citizens' attitudes toward vaccines originating from China and the US and then adopted ordered logistic models to examine how trust in institutions, scientific literacy, and information sources influence their attitudes toward different vaccines. Results A total of 2038 respondents completed the survey. Participants reported very different levels of trust in Chinese and American vaccines. The main finding of this paper is that individuals who trust in Chinese institutions, especially those who trust in domestic scientists, typically feel encouraged to also place their trust in domestic vaccines and to distrust those from the US. These individuals' higher evaluation of Chinese government performance makes them more willing to vaccinate with domestic vaccines and less likely to seek US vaccines. Levels of scientific literacy, furthermore, seem to have little influence on attitudes toward different vaccines. Meanwhile, respondents who acquire health information from biomedical journals are more likely to hold a positive view of US vaccines, and these individuals contribute to bridging the gap between levels of trust in Chinese and US vaccines. Conclusions In contrast with previous findings about Chinese attitudes toward imported vaccines, our respondents are more convinced of the safety and effectiveness of domestic vaccines than of US ones. This trust gap does not arise out of actual disparity in the quality and safety of the different vaccines per se. Instead, it is a cognition concern that is closely bound up with individuals' trust in domestic institutions. People's attitudes toward vaccines of different origins in an emergency context are more influenced by socio-political beliefs than by concern with objective information and knowledge.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yanyu Ye
- Department of Public Administration, School of Law, Hangzhou City University, Hangzhou, China
| | - Zhenhua Su
- Department of International Culture, College of Media and International Culture, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China
| | - Chunyu Shi
- Department of Public Administration, School of Public Management, Zhejiang Gongshang University, Hangzhou, China
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Balgovind P, Mohammadnezhad M. Factors affecting childhood immunization: Thematic analysis of parents and healthcare workers' perceptions. Hum Vaccin Immunother 2022; 18:2137338. [PMID: 36494999 PMCID: PMC9746479 DOI: 10.1080/21645515.2022.2137338] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/06/2022] Open
Abstract
Immunization against common childhood diseases is an important strategy as it is critical for reducing the global child morbidity and mortality. This review explores the perceptions of parents and HCWs toward childhood immunization. The PRISMA guideline was used to search and include the studies. Relevant electronic databases were systemically searched for the years ranging from 2000 to 2021 to identify studies reported in English. Themes were then identified using thematic analysis. A total of 44 studies met the review criteria and were summarized and categorized into 4 themes: barriers to immunization, parental knowledge, attitude and behavior (KAB), health system factors and HCWs' KAB. This review found that immunization decision-making is a complex process. Parental KAB leads to immunization decisions. HCWs were also noted to be the trusted sources of immunization information. Further research can be conducted on how to improve parents' perceptions of immunization and immunization practices.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Preeti Balgovind
- School of Public Health and Primary Care, Fiji National University, Suva, Fiji Islands
| | - Masoud Mohammadnezhad
- School of Nursing and Healthcare Leadership, University of Bradford, Bradford, UK,CONTACT Masoud Mohammadnezhad School of Nursing and Healthcare Leadership, University of Bradford, Bradford, West YorkshireBD7 1DP, UK
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Yan J, Ouyang Z, Vinnikova A, Chen M. Avoidance of the Threats of Defective Vaccines: How a Vaccine Scandal Influences Parents' Protective Behavioral Response. HEALTH COMMUNICATION 2021; 36:962-971. [PMID: 32036688 DOI: 10.1080/10410236.2020.1724638] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/10/2023]
Abstract
This study examined the key factors underlying parents' protective responses to avoid the threats of defective vaccines. We constructed a hypothetical model to explore this issue based on the protective action decision model and risk information perspective. A questionnaire survey involving 584 respondents was conducted in Anhui and Jiangsu provinces, China, after the 2018 vaccine scandal broke. The results indicate that perceived vaccine knowledge is a vital determinant of perceived negative publicity, information forwarding, risk perception, and systematic processing. Moreover, perceived negative publicity significantly predicts information forwarding and risk perception. Perceived negative publicity and information forwarding both positively influence systematic processing. Furthermore, parents' protective responses are motivated by risk perception but fail to be stimulated by systematic processing.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jing Yan
- Institute of Urban and Rural Economics, Anhui Academy of Social Sciences
| | - Zhe Ouyang
- Department of Business Administration, Nanjing University of Finance and Economics
| | - Anna Vinnikova
- School of Management, University of Science and Technology of China
| | | |
Collapse
|
4
|
Gong T, Chen G, Liu P, Lai X, Rong H, Ma X, Hou Z, Fang H, Li S. Parental Vaccine Preferences for Their Children in China: A Discrete Choice Experiment. Vaccines (Basel) 2020; 8:vaccines8040687. [PMID: 33207667 PMCID: PMC7712304 DOI: 10.3390/vaccines8040687] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/18/2020] [Revised: 11/12/2020] [Accepted: 11/12/2020] [Indexed: 11/24/2022] Open
Abstract
Vaccination is one of the most cost-effective health investments to prevent and control communicable diseases. Improving the vaccination rate of children is important for all nations, and for China in particular since the advent of the two-child policy. This study aims to elicit the stated preference of parents for vaccination following recent vaccine-related incidents in China. Potential preference heterogeneity was also explored among respondents. Methods: A discrete choice experiment was developed to elicit parental preferences regarding the key features of vaccines in 2019. The study recruited a national sample of parents from 10 provinces who had at least one child aged between 6 months and 5 years old. A conditional logit model and a mixed logit model were used to estimate parental preference. Results: A total of 598 parents completed the questionnaire; among them, 428 respondents who passed the rational tests were analyzed. All attributes except for the severity of diseases prevented by vaccines were statistically significant. The risk of severe side effects and protection rates were the two most important factors explaining parents’ decisions about vaccination. The results of the mixed logit model with interactions indicate that fathers or rural parents were more likely to vaccinate their children, and children whose health was not good were also more likely to be vaccinated. In addition, parents who were not more than 30 years old had a stronger preference for efficiency, and well-educated parents preferred imported vaccines with the lowest risk of severe side effects. Conclusion: When deciding about vaccinations for their children, parents in China are mostly driven by vaccination safety and vaccine effectiveness and were not affected by the severity of diseases. These findings will be useful for increasing the acceptability of vaccination in China.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tiantian Gong
- Centre for Health Management and Policy Research, School of Public Health, Cheeloo College of Medicine, Shandong University, Jinan 250012, China; (T.G.); (P.L.)
- NHC Key Lab of Health Economics and Policy Research, Shandong University, Jinan 250012, China
| | - Gang Chen
- Centre for Health Economics, Monash Business School, Monash University, Melbourne 3145, Australia;
| | - Ping Liu
- Centre for Health Management and Policy Research, School of Public Health, Cheeloo College of Medicine, Shandong University, Jinan 250012, China; (T.G.); (P.L.)
- NHC Key Lab of Health Economics and Policy Research, Shandong University, Jinan 250012, China
| | - Xiaozhen Lai
- School of Public Health, Peking University, Beijing 100083, China;
| | - Hongguo Rong
- China Center for Health Development Studies, Peking University, Beijing 100083, China; (H.R.); (X.M.)
| | - Xiaochen Ma
- China Center for Health Development Studies, Peking University, Beijing 100083, China; (H.R.); (X.M.)
| | - Zhiyuan Hou
- School of Public Health, Fudan University, Shanghai 200032, China;
| | - Hai Fang
- China Center for Health Development Studies, Peking University, Beijing 100083, China; (H.R.); (X.M.)
- Peking University Health Science Center-Chinese Center for Disease Control and Prevention Joint Center for Vaccine Economics, Beijing 100083, China
- Key Laboratory of Reproductive Health National Health Commission of the People’s Republic of China, Beijing 100083, China
- Correspondence: (H.F.); (S.L.)
| | - Shunping Li
- Centre for Health Management and Policy Research, School of Public Health, Cheeloo College of Medicine, Shandong University, Jinan 250012, China; (T.G.); (P.L.)
- NHC Key Lab of Health Economics and Policy Research, Shandong University, Jinan 250012, China
- Correspondence: (H.F.); (S.L.)
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Dong D, Xu RH, Wong ELY, Hung CT, Feng D, Feng Z, Yeoh EK, Wong SYS. Public preference for COVID-19 vaccines in China: A discrete choice experiment. Health Expect 2020; 23:1543-1578. [PMID: 33022806 PMCID: PMC7752198 DOI: 10.1111/hex.13140] [Citation(s) in RCA: 91] [Impact Index Per Article: 22.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/31/2020] [Revised: 09/02/2020] [Accepted: 09/06/2020] [Indexed: 01/12/2023] Open
Abstract
Background As the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID‐19) pandemic is sweeping across the globe, there is an urgent need to develop effective vaccines as the most powerful strategy to end the pandemic. This study aimed to examine how factors related to vaccine characteristics, their social normative influence and convenience of vaccination can affect the public's preference for the uptake of the COVID‐19 vaccine in China. Methods An online discrete choice experiment (DCE) survey was administered to a sample of China's general population. Participants were asked to make a series of hypothetical choices and estimate their preference for different attributes of the vaccine. A mixed logit regression model was used to analyse the DCE data. Willingness to pay for each attribute was also calculated. Results Data of 1236 participants who provided valid responses were included in the analysis. There was strong public preference for high effectiveness of the vaccine, followed by long protective duration, very few adverse events and being manufactured overseas. Price was the least important attribute affecting the public preference in selecting the COVID‐19 vaccine. Conclusions The strong public preferences detected in this study should be considered when developing COVID‐19 vaccination programme in China. The results provide useful information for policymakers to identify the individual and social values for a good vaccination strategy. Patient or Public Contribution The design of the experimental choices was fully based on interviews and focus group discussions participated by 26 Chinese people with diverse socio‐economic backgrounds. Without their participation, the study would not be possible.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dong Dong
- The Jockey Club School of Public Health & Primary Care, Faculty of Medicine, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, China.,Centre for Health Systems and Policy Research, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, China
| | - Richard Huan Xu
- The Jockey Club School of Public Health & Primary Care, Faculty of Medicine, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, China.,Centre for Health Systems and Policy Research, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, China
| | - Eliza Lai-Yi Wong
- The Jockey Club School of Public Health & Primary Care, Faculty of Medicine, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, China.,Centre for Health Systems and Policy Research, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, China
| | - Chi-Tim Hung
- The Jockey Club School of Public Health & Primary Care, Faculty of Medicine, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, China.,Centre for Health Systems and Policy Research, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, China
| | - Da Feng
- School of Pharmacy, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science & Technology, Wuhan, China
| | - Zhanchun Feng
- School of Medicine and Health Management, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science & Technology, Wuhan, China
| | - Eng-Kiong Yeoh
- The Jockey Club School of Public Health & Primary Care, Faculty of Medicine, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, China.,Centre for Health Systems and Policy Research, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, China
| | - Samuel Yeung-Shan Wong
- The Jockey Club School of Public Health & Primary Care, Faculty of Medicine, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, China
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
A conjoint analysis of stated vaccine preferences in Shanghai, China. Vaccine 2020; 38:1520-1525. [DOI: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2019.11.062] [Citation(s) in RCA: 27] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/06/2019] [Revised: 11/08/2019] [Accepted: 11/25/2019] [Indexed: 01/09/2023]
|