Neuropathic-like symptoms and the association with joint-specific function and quality of life in patients with hip and knee osteoarthritis

A Review of Current Approaches to Pain Management in Knee Osteoarthritis with a Focus on Italian Clinical Landscape

The global cases of knee osteoarthritis (KOA) are projected to increase by 74.9% by 2050. Currently, over half of patients remain dissatisfied with their pain relief. This review addresses unmet needs for moderate-to-severe KOA pain; it offers evidence and insights for improved management. Italian experts from the fields of rheumatology, physical medicine and rehabilitation, orthopedics, primary care, and pain therapy have identified several key issues. They emphasized the need for standardized care protocols to address inconsistencies in patient management across different specialties. Early diagnosis is crucial, as cartilage responds better to early protective and structural therapies. Faster access to physiatrist evaluation and reimbursement for physical, rehabilitative, and pharmacological treatments, including intra-articular (IA) therapy, could reduce access disparities. Concerns surround the adverse effects of oral pharmacological treatments, highlighting the need for safer alternatives. Patient satisfaction with corticosteroids and hyaluronic acid-based IA therapies reduces over time and there is no consensus on the optimal IA therapy protocol. Surgery should be reserved for severe symptoms and radiographic KOA evidence, as chronic pain post-surgery poses significant societal and economic burdens. The experts advocate for a multidisciplinary approach, promoting interaction and collaboration between specialists and general practitioners, to enhance KOA care and treatment consistency in Italy.

Assessment of Neuropathic Pain in Erosive Hand Osteoarthritis

Background/Objectives: Erosive hand osteoarthritis (EHOA) is an aggressive form of hand osteoarthritis (OA) and a severely disabling condition. Patients affected by OA frequently lament symptoms suggestive of neuropathic pain (NP). The aim of our study was to ascertain the presence and severity of NP in patients with EHOA and correlate its presence with EHOA clinical characteristics. Methods: In this retrospective study, we included all consecutive EHOA patients with NP symptoms who underwent upper limb electroneurography (ENoG) and nerve ultrasound. The presence of NP was screened using the ID pain neuropathic pain-screening questionnaire (ID-Pain). In addition, the following NP questionnaires were also used: Douleur Neuropathique en 4 Questions (DN4), PainDETECT, and Neuropathic Pain Symptom Inventory (NPSI). Moreover, patients completed the Australian/Canadian Osteoarthritis Hand Index (AUSCAN) and Dreiser's algofunctional finger index questionnaires assessing EHOA disease activity. The following clinical and laboratory data were collected: age, sex, BMI, disease duration, intensity of pain (VAS 0-10), painful and swollen joints, and inflammatory indices, as well as C-reactive protein (CRP) and erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR). Results: Of the 34 patients studied, 24 (70.6%) presented NP to the ID-Pain questionnaire. According to DN4, 14 (41.2%) patients had NP, while using the PainDETECT questionnaire, 67.6% had NP. Patients with NP were statistically younger and had a higher VAS pain score compared to subjects without NP. The ENoG and median nerve ultrasound were normal in 81% of patients, while four patients had carpal tunnel syndrome. The ID-Pain questionnaire correlated with the number of painful joints (r = 0.48, p = 0.03) and with the AUSCAN questionnaire (r = 0.37, p = 0.05). The DN4 questionnaire correlated with PainDETECT (r = 0.58, p < 0.01). The PainDETECT questionnaire correlated with VAS pain (r = 0.49, p = 0.02), the DN4 questionnaire (r = 0.58, p < 0.01), and AUSCAN (r = 0.51, p = 0.02). The NPSI questionnaire correlated negatively with BMI (r = -0.53, p = 0.01) and positively with the PainDETECT questionnaire (r = 0.49, p = 0.02). Conclusions: Our study revealed that 32% to 70% of EHOA patients exhibited symptoms consistent with NP, with observed variability depending on the questionnaire utilized. Despite patients frequently exhibiting symptoms compatible with NP, only 19% of patients presented alterations on ENoG and ultrasound examinations confirming CTS. This suggests a probable nociplastic component for pain in patients with EHOA, which warrants tailored treatment. In the present study, NP correlated with clinical and functional indices of EHOA.

The usage of a modified straight-leg raise neurodynamic test and hamstring flexibility for diagnosis of non-specific low back pain: A cross-sectional study

OBJECTIVES

The main purpose of this research study was to compare mean modified straight-leg raise test (mSLR) and hamstring muscle length (HL) between chronic non-specific low back pain (LBP) and healthy subjects to understand the possibility of neuropathic causes in LBP population as it may impact the diagnosis and treatment of LBP. Another purpose was to compare mean mSLR between those with lumbar nerve root impingement and those without as determine by magnetic resonance imaging (MRI).

METHODS

The design of the study is cross sectional and included 32 subjects with ages ranging from 18-50 years old. Clinical exam objective measures were collected such as patient questionnaires, somatosensory tests, HL range of motion, and a mSLR test, and were compared to the findings from a structural lumbar spine MRI.

RESULTS

There were no significant differences in mean HL angulation and mSLR angulation between LBP and healthy subjects (p>0.05). There was no significant difference in mean HL by impingement by versus no impingement (38.3±15.6 versus 44.8±9.4, p = 0.08, Cohen's d = 0.50). On the other hand, there was a significant difference in mean mSLR angulation by impingement (57.6.3±8.7 versus 63.8±11.6, p = 0.05, Cohen's d = 0.60).

CONCLUSIONS

The mSLR test was found to be associated with lumbar nerve root compression, regardless of the existence of radiating leg symptoms, and showed no association solely with the report of LBP. The findings highlight the diagnostic dilemma facing clinicians in patients with chronic nonspecific LBP with uncorrelated neuroanatomical image findings. Clinically, it may be necessary to reevaluate the common practice of exclusively using the mSLR test for patients with leg symptoms. This study may impact the way chronic LBP and neuropathic symptoms are diagnosed, potentially improving treatment methods, reducing persistent symptoms, and ultimately improving disabling effects.

Neuropathic pain in patients with osteoarthritis of the hip before and after total hip arthroplasty

OBJECTIVES

The pain associated with osteoarthritis (OA) was thought to be nociceptive; however, neuropathic pain is also observed. We investigated the relationship between hip OA and neuropathic pain using the PainDETECT questionnaire (PDQ).

METHODS

A total of 159 hips of 146 consecutive patients who underwent total hip arthroplasty (THA) with a diagnosis of OA were enrolled in this study. The prevalence of each pain phenotype was evaluated preoperatively and at 6 months postoperatively using the PDQ. Patient characteristics and numerical rating scale (NRS) scores were compared between a group with possible neuropathic pain (NP group) and a group with nociceptive pain (non-NP group).

RESULTS

Before THA, neuropathic, unclear, and nociceptive pain was observed in 18, 36, and 105 hips, respectively. The prevalence in the NP group was 54 hips, accounting for approximately one-third of all hips, which decreased significantly to seven hips after THA. A significantly higher NRS score was observed in the NP group, both before and after THA.

CONCLUSION

Approximately one-third of the patients with hip OA had neuropathic pain. Therefore, neuropathic pain should be considered when treating patients with hip OA.

Existing hip joint disease is associated with an increased incidence of hip fracture in adults: A retrospective survey of 9710 individuals from a single center

Objective

In hip disease patients, pain and movement restrictions might cause changes in bone strength and increase the likelihood of falls, finally leading to hip fracture. The aim of this study was to identify the incidence of, characteristics of and risk factors for hip fracture in patients with existing hip disease.

Methods

This was a retrospective cohort study. Patients with existing hip disease treated at both outpatient and inpatient departments of our institute were identified by searching the electronic medical record system and followed retrospectively for the occurrence of hip fracture. Demographic and clinical characteristics, such as age, sex and kind of primary hip disease, were collected from the electronic medical record system. The incidence and timing of hip fracture were estimated, and a Cox regression model was built to identify the independent risk factors for hip fracture in these patients.

Results

A total of 9710 eligible patients were included. After a mean follow-up of 3.97 years, hip fractures were identified in 95 patients, for an estimated incidence of hip fracture of 978.37 per 100,000 patients. The femoral neck was involved in 49 fractures (51.58 %), and the femoral trochanter was involved in 45 fractures (47.37 %). Four independent risk factors and one protective factor for hip fracture in patients with hip diseases were identified: age (HR = 1.116, 95 % CI = 1.094-1.138), the presence of osteonecrosis of the femoral head (HR = 2.201, 95 % CI = 1.217-3.980), a lower Harris hip score (HR = 0.966, 95 % CI = 0.949-0.982), a history of previous hip surgery (HR = 2.126, 95 % CI = 1.304-3.466) and the use of walking aids (HR = 0.588, 95 % CI = 0.354-0.975). A scoring system with a total score of 20 points was built, which included all of the above risk factors. The predictive scores for a low risk (estimated incidence of hip fracture ≤30 %), a moderate risk (estimated incidence of hip fracture 31 %-69 %), and a high risk (estimated incidence of hip fracture ≥70 %) of hip fracture were ≤8.5 points, 9.0-13.0 points and ≥13.5 points, respectively.

Conclusion

The incidence of hip fracture in the special population of patients with existing hip disease was determined. Elderly patients, patients with a history of hip surgery, patients with osteonecrosis and patients with poor Harris hip scores were at increased risk of hip fracture. In patients with a predictive score greater than 9 points, indicating a moderate to high risk of hip fracture, the use of a walking aid might reduce the risk of hip fracture.

Utilization of PROMIS Neuropathic Pain Quality for Detection and Monitoring Neuropathic Pain in Heel Pain Patients

Background

Diagnosis and management of neuropathic pain (NP) in foot and ankle patients remain challenging. We investigated the plausibility of using Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Neuropathic Pain Quality (PQ-Neuro) as an initial screening tool to detect NP and track the treatment effects.

Methods

Patients with heel pain were prospectively recruited and grouped to no-NP, mild-NP, and severe-NP based on the initial PROMIS PQ-Neuro t scores. Pain Interference (PI), Physical Function (PF), and Self-Efficacy (SE) scores were evaluated at baseline, 30-day, and 90-day follow-up. Other factors such as age, smoking, body mass index (BMI), low back/neck pain, anxiety/depression, and medications were analyzed. Linear mixed modeling was used to assess the main effects of time and NP on PROMIS t scores, comparing minimal clinically important difference (MCID).

Results

Forty-eight patients with mean age of 52.4 years were recruited. Using the PROMIS PQ-Neuro as the assessment tool, 33 patients (69%) were detected to have NP at baseline-23 (48%) mild and 10 (21%) severe. BMI was the only independent factor associated with NP (P = .011). Higher baseline PQ-Neuro t score was significantly associated with higher follow-up PQ-Neuro (P < .001), PI (P = .005), and lower SE (P = .04) across time points. Patients with NP showed lower PF at baseline with significantly less improvement in PF (3 vs 9.9, P = .035) and did not meet MCID.

Conclusion

Baseline PROMIS PQ-Neuro ≥46 was significantly associated with worse PI and SE across all time points, with less clinically significant improvements in PF. Prevalence of NP in heel pain patients was high. The PROMIS PQ-Neuro may serve as a valuable tool for detection of NP and guiding clinical treatment decision pathways for heel pain patients.

Level of Evidence

Level III, prospective cohort study.

Neuropathic Pain Associated With First Metatarsophalangeal Joint Osteoarthritis: Frequency and Associated Factors

OBJECTIVE

To determine whether neuropathic pain is a feature of first metatarsophalangeal (MTP) joint osteoarthritis (OA).

METHODS

A total of 98 participants (mean ± SD age 57.4 ± 10.3 years) with symptomatic radiographic first MTP joint OA completed the PainDETECT questionnaire (PD-Q), which has 9 questions regarding the intensity and quality of pain. The likelihood of neuropathic pain was determined using established PD-Q cutoff points. Participants with unlikely neuropathic pain were then compared to those with possible/likely neuropathic pain in relation to age, sex, general health (Short Form 12 [SF-12] health survey), psychological well-being (Depression, Anxiety and Stress Scale), pain characteristics (self-efficacy, duration, and severity), foot health (Foot Health Status Questionnaire [FHSQ]), first MTP dorsiflexion range of motion, and radiographic severity. Effect sizes (Cohen's d coefficient) were also calculated.

RESULTS

A total of 30 (31%) participants had possible/likely neuropathic pain (19 possible [19.4%], 11 likely [11.2%]). The most common neuropathic symptoms were sensitivity to pressure (56%), sudden pain attacks/electric shocks (36%) and burning (24%). Compared to those with unlikely neuropathic pain, those with possible/likely neuropathic pain were significantly older (d = 0.59, P = 0.010), had worse SF-12 physical scores (d = 1.10, P < 0.001), pain self-efficacy scores (d = 0.98, P < 0.001), FHSQ pain scores (d = 0.98, P < 0.001), and FHSQ function scores (d = 0.82, P < 0.001), and had higher pain severity at rest (d = 1.01, P < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

A significant proportion of individuals with first MTP joint OA report symptoms suggestive of neuropathic pain, which may partly explain the suboptimal responses to commonly used treatments for this condition. Screening for neuropathic pain may be useful in the selection of targeted interventions and may improve clinical outcomes.

Effect of medial opening wedge distal tibial tuberosity osteotomy on possible neuropathic pain in patients with osteoarthritis of the knee

BACKGROUND

There is a paucity of literature regarding the changes and features of neuropathic pain (NP) in knee osteoarthritis (OA) following medial opening wedge distal tibial tuberosity osteotomy (OWDTO). This study aimed to investigate the effect of OWDTO on NP in knee OA; we hypothesized that OWDTO improves knee symptoms and functions and also meets patient satisfaction in those with knee OA with possible NP or without NP.

METHODS

Fifty-two consecutive patients who underwent OWDTO were categorized into the unlikely NP and possible NP groups using the painDETECT questionnaire. The Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Arthritis Index (WOMAC) score and the Knee Society Score 2011 (KSS 2011) were compared between the groups preoperatively and at the 1-year follow-up.

RESULTS

The number of patients having possible NP significantly decreased from 12 (23.1%) preoperatively to one (1.9%) postoperatively (p < 0.001). The patient with postoperative possible NP also had possible NP preoperatively. All preoperative sub-scores of WOMAC were significantly higher in the possible NP group than in the unlikely NP group (p = 0.018, 0.013, 0.004, and 0.005, respectively); however, the postoperative scores did not differ between the two groups. Regarding the KSS 2011, the preoperative scores for symptom and functional activities were significantly lower in the possible NP group than in the unlikely NP group (p = 0.031 and 0.024, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

OWDTO is an effective surgery for patients with possible NP; it improves symptoms and knee function as well as meets patient satisfaction.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level IV, therapeutic case series.

Neuropathic-like symptoms and central sensitization related signs and symptoms negatively affect the functional performance of patients with knee osteoarthritis – a cross-sectional study

Objective

This study aimed to compare the functional performance among participants with a neuropathic-like symptoms (NS) and central sensitization related signs and symptoms (CS), and their knee osteoarthritis (OA) counterparts.

Methods

A cross-sectional observational study was conducted with 125 participants with knee OA (94 females, mean age 63.1 ​± ​7.4 years). Participants completed a self-reported questionnaire with personal and clinical features and musculoskeletal pain characteristics, including NS (PainDETECT), CS (Central Sensitization Inventory, CSI), and conditioned pain modulation. Self-reported functional disability (Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index, WOMAC) and functional mobility (Timed Up and Go, TUG) were compared among patients with NS, CS, and their knee OA counterparts using the one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA).

Results

Thirty-three (26.4%) participants had NS and CS, eighteen (14.4%) had NS, twenty-seven (21.6%) participants had CS, and 47 (37.6%) had knee OA with no NS or CS. A one-way ANOVA revealed greater functional limitation in the group with NS and CS (mean ​= ​67.5 ​± ​12.0) or NS (mean ​= ​56.7 ​± ​17.5) than the group without these symptoms (mean ​= ​32.0 ​± ​20.7) with a statistical significance difference [F(3, 121) ​= ​29.434, p ​< ​0.001] in the WOMAC Total score. The group with NS and CS (mean ​= ​19.2 ​± ​7.4) or NS (mean ​= ​16.3 ​± ​6.3) had slower velocity than the group without these symptoms (mean ​= ​11.6 ​± ​3.5) with a statistical significance difference [F(3,121) ​= ​10.045, p ​< ​0.001] in the TUG test.

Conclusion

Participants with knee osteoarthritis and NS or CS pain phenotype have greater functional limitations than their counterparts.

Can radiological findings detect neuropathic pain in patients with osteoarthritis of the knee undergoing surgery?

OBJECTIVES

The mechanism underlying neuropathic pain (NP) in osteoarthritis (OA) of the knee is not completely understood. This study aimed to investigate whether possible NP in patients with knee OA undergoing knee surgery is associated with specific radiological findings.

METHODS

This study included 197 patients who underwent knee surgery for symptomatic knee OA. Clinical evaluation was performed using the Central Sensitization Inventory (CSI), Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Arthritis Index (WOMAC), and PainDETECT questionnaire. Radiological evaluation was performed using the hip-knee-ankle (HKA) angle, posterior tibial slope (PTS), varus and valgus laxities, and magnetic resonance imaging OA Knee Score (MOAKS). Radiological findings were compared between patients with possible and unlikely NP. Logistic regression analysis was performed to identify the predictive factors for NP.

RESULTS

There were 163 and 34 patients with unlikely NP and with possible NP, respectively. The percentage of patients with CSI score ≥ 40 was significantly higher in the possible NP group than in the unlikely NP group (17.6% vs. 6.1%). Patients with possible NP had worse WOMAC scores than patients with unlikely NP. There were no significant positive associations between the possible NP and radiological findings in knee OA. Regression analysis showed no predictive factors for possible NP.

CONCLUSIONS

Possible NP is not associated with specific radiological findings in knee OA. Patients with possible NP may mediate CS and experience more severe symptoms, including decreased knee function and lower quality of life, than patients with unlikely NP.

Pain Sensitization and Neuropathic Pain-like Symptoms Associated with Effectiveness of Exercise Therapy in Patients with Hip and Knee Osteoarthritis

Pain sensitization and neuropathic pain-like symptoms are some of the common pain symptoms in patients with lower limbs, including hip and knee, osteoarthritis (HOA/KOA). Exercise therapy has been the first-line treatment; however, the effects differ for each patient. This prospective cohort study investigated the relationship between the effectiveness of exercise therapy and pretreatment characteristics (radiologic severity, pain sensitization, and neuropathic pain-like symptoms) of patients with HOA/KOA. We assessed the pain intensity using a numerical rating scale (NRS) before and after 12 weeks of exercise therapy in patients with HOA/KOA (n = 101). Before treatment, the Kellgren–Lawrence (K-L) grade; minimum joint space width (mJSW); pressure pain threshold (PPT) and temporal summation of pain (TSP) at the affected joint, tibia, and forearm; Central Sensitization Inventory-9; and painDETECT questionnaire (PDQ) were assessed. Cluster analysis was based on the pretreatment NRS and change in NRS with exercise therapy to identify the subgroups of pain reduction. The pretreatment characteristics of each cluster were compared. According to the results of the cluster analyses, patients in cluster 1 had severe pain that did not improve after exercise therapy, patients in cluster 2 had severe pain that improved, and those in cluster 3 had mild pain that improved. The patients in cluster 1 exhibited lower PPT at all measurement sites, higher TSP at the affected joint, and higher PDQ scores than those in other clusters. There was no difference in the K-L grade and mJSW among the clusters. The subgroup with severe pain and pain sensitization or neuropathic pain-like symptoms at pretreatment, even with mild joint deformity, may have difficulty in achieving improvement in pain after 12 weeks of exercise therapy. These findings could be useful for prognosis prediction and for planning exercise therapy and combining with other treatment.

Chronic Pain in Musculoskeletal Diseases: Do You Know Your Enemy?

Musculoskeletal pain is a condition that characterises several diseases and represents a constantly growing issue with enormous socio-economic burdens, highlighting the importance of developing treatment algorithms appropriate to the patient’s needs and effective management strategies. Indeed, the algic condition must be assessed and treated independently of the underlying pathological process since it has an extremely negative impact on the emotional and psychic aspects of the individual, leading to isolation and depression. A full understanding of the pathophysiological mechanisms involved in nociceptive stimulation and central sensitization is an important step in improving approaches to musculoskeletal pain. In this context, the bidirectional relationship between immune cells and neurons involved in nociception could represent a key point in the understanding of these mechanisms. Therefore, we provide an updated overview of the magnitude of the musculoskeletal pain problem, in terms of prevalence and costs, and summarise the role of the most important molecular players involved in the development and maintenance of pain. Finally, based on the pathophysiological mechanisms, we propose a model, called the “musculoskeletal pain cycle”, which could be a useful tool to counteract resignation to the algic condition and provide a starting point for developing a treatment algorithm for the patient with musculoskeletal pain.

Phenotypic classification of knee osteoarthritis according to pain mechanisms; a clinical observational study

BACKGROUND

Pain in knee osteoarthritis is considered to be nociceptive. Recently, involvement of neuropathic pain and psychosocial factors in knee osteoarthritis has been reported. However, the following details are unclear: 1) How often are neuropathic pain and psychosocial factors involved? And 2) Which patients are associated with neuropathic pain and psychosocial factors?

METHODS

In 104 patients with knee osteoarthritis, we evaluated neuropathic pain factor with a painDETECT questionnaire and catastrophic thinking using the pain catastrophizing scale. Pain intensity was assessed using the visual analog scale; patients with scores below the median were defined as low-pain group and others as high-pain group. Radiographic severity was categorized according to the Kellgren-Lawrence classification, with grades I-II and III-IV defined as low- and high-grades, respectively. We compared the painDETECT and pain catastrophizing scale scores between the low- and high-pain groups and low- and high-grade groups. Furthermore, the painDETECT and pain catastrophizing scale scores were compared among the following four groups: low-grade/low-pain, low-grade/high-pain, high-grade/low-pain, and high-grade/high-pain.

RESULTS

Neuropathic pain factor and catastrophic thinking were found in 16% and 34% of patients, respectively. There were no significant differences in both painDETECT and pain catastrophizing scale scores between the two pain intensity groups. Between the two groups of radiographic severity, there was no significant difference in the painDETECT scores; however, the pain catastrophizing scale score was significantly high in the low-grade group. In addition, there was no significant difference in the painDETECT scores among the four groups; however, the pain catastrophizing scale scores were significantly higher in low-grade/high-pain than in high-grade/low-pain patients.

CONCLUSIONS

Therefore, 64% had only nociceptive pain factor. Catastrophic thinking was strong in patients with low radiographic severity, especially in those with high pain intensity. Patients with neuropathic pain factor could not be identified from radiographic severity and pain intensity.

High Prevalence of Pain Sensitization in Knee Osteoarthritis: A Meta-Analysis with Meta-Regression

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this meta-analysis was to study the evidence on pain sensitization in knee osteoarthritis (OA), providing a quantitative synthesis of its prevalence and impact. Factors associated with pain sensitization were also investigated.

METHODS

Meta-analysis; PubMed (MEDLINE), Cochrane Central Register (CENTRAL), and Web of Science were searched on February 2021. Level I to level IV studies evaluating the presence of pain sensitization in patients with symptomatic knee OA, documented through a validated method (questionnaires or quantitative sensory testing), were included. The primary outcome was the prevalence of pain sensitization. Factors influencing the prevalence were also evaluated, as well as differences in terms of pain thresholds between knee OA patients and healthy controls.

RESULTS

Fifty-three articles including 7,117 patients were included. The meta-analysis of proportion documented a prevalence of pain sensitization of 20% (95% confidence interval [CI] = 16%-26%) with a significant heterogeneity of results (I² = 89%, P < 0.001). The diagnostic tool used was the main factor influencing the documented prevalence of pain sensitization (P = 0.01). Knee OA patients presented higher pain sensitivity compared with healthy controls, both in terms of local pressure pain threshold (standardized mean difference [SMD] = -1.00, 95% CI = -1.67 to -0.32, P = 0.007) and distant pressure pain threshold (SMD = -0.54, 95% CI = -0.76 to -0.31, P < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Knee OA pain presents features that are consistent with a significant degree of pain sensitization. There is a high heterogeneity in the reported results, mainly based on the diagnostic tool used. The identification of the best methods to detect pain sensitization is warranted to correctly evaluate and manage symptoms of patients affected by knee OA.

REGISTRATION

PROSPERO CRD42019123347.

How does hip osteoarthritis differ from knee osteoarthritis?

Hip and knee osteoarthritis (OA) are leading causes of global disability. Most research to date has focused on the knee, with results often extrapolated to the hip, and this extends to treatment recommendations in clinical guidelines. Extrapolating results from research on knee OA may limit our understanding of disease characteristics specific to hip OA, thereby constraining development and implementation of effective treatments. This review highlights differences between hip and knee OA with respect to prevalence, prognosis, epigenetics, pathophysiology, anatomical and biomechanical factors, clinical presentation, pain and non-surgical treatment recommendations and management.

Neuropathic pain in the IMI-APPROACH knee osteoarthritis cohort: prevalence and phenotyping

Objectives

Osteoarthritis (OA) patients with a neuropathic pain (NP) component may represent a specific phenotype. This study compares joint damage, pain and functional disability between knee OA patients with a likely NP component, and those without a likely NP component.

Methods

Baseline data from the Innovative Medicines Initiative Applied Public-Private Research enabling OsteoArthritis Clinical Headway knee OA cohort study were used. Patients with a painDETECT score ≥19 (with likely NP component, n=24) were matched on a 1:2 ratio to patients with a painDETECT score ≤12 (without likely NP component), and similar knee and general pain (Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score pain and Short Form 36 pain). Pain, physical function and radiographic joint damage of multiple joints were determined and compared between OA patients with and without a likely NP component.

Results

OA patients with painDETECT scores ≥19 had statistically significant less radiographic joint damage (p≤0.04 for Knee Images Digital Analysis parameters and Kellgren and Lawrence grade), but an impaired physical function (p<0.003 for all tests) compared with patients with a painDETECT score ≤12. In addition, more severe pain was found in joints other than the index knee (p≤0.001 for hips and hands), while joint damage throughout the body was not different.

Conclusions

OA patients with a likely NP component, as determined with the painDETECT questionnaire, may represent a specific OA phenotype, where local and overall joint damage is not the main cause of pain and disability. Patients with this NP component will likely not benefit from general pain medication and/or disease-modifying OA drug (DMOAD) therapy. Reserved inclusion of these patients in DMOAD trials is advised in the quest for successful OA treatments.

Trial registration number

The study is registered under clinicaltrials.gov nr: NCT03883568.

Does the Presence of Neuropathic Pain Influence the Response to Hyaluronic Acid in Patients with Knee Osteoarthritis?

OBJECTIVES

Up to 50% of patients with symptomatic knee osteoarthritis (OA) present with neuropathic pain (NP) features. We assessed the impact of NP according to DN4 (Douleurs Neuropathiques 4 questions) score on the response to intra-articular (IA) hyaluronic acid (HA) injections and the effects of HA injections on NP.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We conducted a post hoc analysis from a multicenter, randomized, double-blind, noninferiority trial comparing the efficacy of 2 HA in symptomatic knee OA at 24 weeks. At baseline, demographic, anthropometric, radiologic data, and symptoms were recorded. The symptomatic effect of HA was assessed by VAS pain, patient global assessment (PGA), WOMAC, DN4, and OMERACT-OARSI response.

RESULTS

A total of 187 patients were included. NP according to DN4 score was present in 20 patients (10.7%) at baseline. Most common positive DN4 items were tingling (36.9%) and burning (36.4%). NP was associated with WOMAC pain score (P = 0.02). The presence of NP at baseline did not affect the symptomatic improvement after HA injections according to the VAS pain (P = 0.71), PGA (P = 050), WOMAC pain (P = 0.89), WOMAC function (P = 0.52), and rate of OMERACT-OARSI responders (P = 0.21). The prevalence of patients with NP decreased by 50% (n = 10) at 24 weeks after HA injections. Most improved DN4 items were itching (90%), hypoesthesia to pinprick (88%), and burning (50%).

CONCLUSION

In our study, NP was associated with pain severity, but did not influence the response to IA HA. On the other hand, HA injections reduced some NP features, especially itching, sting hypoesthesia, and burning.

Mechanism of Chronic Pain of Symptomatic Hip Osteoarthritis by Association of its Distribution, Nociceptive, Neuropathic, Nociplastic, or Mixed-pain Screening, and the Prevalence of Lumbar Spinal Stenosis: A Cross-sectional Study

OBJECTIVES

The pain of hip osteoarthritis (OA) is generally recognized as nociceptive in origin because of the local pathology. However, some patients with OA experience a neuropathic pain component as an essential part of some nociplastic pain subtype. Here, we sought to examine the mechanism of chronic pain of symptomatic hip OA by the association of its distribution, complex pain mechanism screening, and the prevalence of lumbar spinal stenosis.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We conducted a prospective cross-sectional study of 100 hips in 100 patients with symptomatic hip OA in a chronic state. We examined all baseline clinical characteristics including clinical and functional score, location of pain and numbness, and pain score (PainDETECT questionnaire and the Leeds Assessment of Neuropathic Symptoms and Signs), and magnetic resonance imaging of the hip and lumbar spine.

RESULTS

The PainDETECT questionnaire and Leeds Assessment of Neuropathic Symptoms and Signs revealed that 23% of the patients had a neuropathic pain component. There were 24 variations of the pain pattern. By contrast, the pain localized around the hip joint was only 15%. Pain distal to the thigh and any numbness was significantly more frequent in the group with neuropathic pain (P<0.001). Lumbar spinal stenosis grade was not significantly different between patients with nociceptive pain and those with neuropathic pain. Pain score was significantly correlated with the pain in clinical and functional scores.

DISCUSSION

Among patients with symptomatic hip OA, the distribution of pain was various, and about 23% of patients had neuropathic, nociplastic, or mixed pain as a possibility for somatosensory system disturbances.

Possible Neuropathic Pain in Patients with Osteoarthritis of the Knee Before and After Total Knee Arthroplasty

Purpose

Although the pain of osteoarthritis (OA) is traditionally considered to be nociceptive, some patients also have neuropathic pain. The objective of this study was to evaluate the presence of neuropathic pain in the knees of OA patients using the painDETECT questionnaire (PDQ).

Methods

A total of 180 knees in 158 consecutive patients who underwent total knee arthroplasty (TKA) were enrolled prospectively. The prevalence of neuropathic pain, unclear pain, and nociceptive pain in the knee was determined before and after TKA using a numerical rating scale (NRS). All patients were evaluated preoperatively and 6 months postoperatively. Neuropathic pain and unclear pain were grouped together as possible neuropathic pain. The relationship between possible neuropathic pain and pain intensity was evaluated.

Results

Before TKA, neuropathic pain and unclear pain were found in 10 and 30 knees, respectively. The remaining 140 knees were categorized as nociceptive pain. After TKA, the numbers of knees with neuropathic and unclear pain decreased to one and five, respectively. The prevalence of possible neuropathic pain decreased significantly from 22.2% to 3.3% after surgery. Among the six knees with possible neuropathic pain postoperatively, four had possible neuropathic pain preoperatively as well, while the remaining two patients had been classified as nociceptive pain preoperatively. Knees with possible neuropathic pain postoperatively had higher postoperative NRS scores than those with nociceptive pain.

Conclusion

Although the prevalence of possible neuropathic pain decreased significantly after TKA, the preoperative presence of possible neuropathic pain might be associated with the development of persistent postoperative pain following TKA.

Neuropathic Pain in Hand Osteoarthritis: A Cross-Sectional Study

Symptomatic hand osteoarthritis (OA) is a severely debilitating condition. Neuropathic pain (NP) has been shown to be a factor affecting pain severity, hand function, psychological wellbeing, body schema, and the number of pain medications in people with OA of other joints. The aim of this study was to assess the prevalence of NP in symptomatic hand OA and assess its association with pain, hand function, measures of psychological wellbeing, sleep, body schema disturbances, and number of pain medications. Participants with symptomatic hand OA diagnosed through the American College of Rheumatology criteria, were recruited and completed a series of online questionnaires. These included the Douleur Neuropathique 4 interview (DN4-interview), Short Form Brief Pain Inventory (SF-BPI), Neglect-like Symptoms questionnaire, Functional Index of Hand Osteoarthritis (FIHOA), Centre for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale (CES-D), Pain Catastrophising Scale (PCS), and the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI). Logistic regression with age, body mass index, and sex as covariates were utilised to assess differences between participants with and without NP as identified through the DN4-interview. Correlation analysis assessed the relationship between pain intensity, body schema alterations, and number of pain medications. A total of 121 participants were included in the present study. Forty-two percent of participants presented with NP. Participants with NP reported higher levels of worst pain (OR: 10.2 95% CI: 2.2 to 48.5; p = 0.007). Worst pain intensity correlated with the number of pain medications (rho = 0.2; p = 0.04), and neglect-like symptoms (rho = 0.4; p < 0.0001). No difference between phenotypes was shown for catastrophising, function, depression, neglect-like symptoms, pain interference, or sleep. A large proportion of people with symptomatic hand OA present with NP. This phenotype is characterised by greater levels of pain intensity. Pain intensity is associated with number of pain relief medications and body schema alteration. Psychological factors, hand function, and sleep do not appear to be affected by the presence of NP.

Monoclonal Antibodies for Chronic Pain Treatment: Present and Future

Chronic pain remains a major problem worldwide, despite the availability of various non-pharmacological and pharmacological treatment options. Therefore, new analgesics with novel mechanisms of action are needed. Monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) are directed against specific, targeted molecules involved in pain signaling and processing pathways that look to be very effective and promising as a novel therapy in pain management. Thus, there are mAbs against tumor necrosis factor (TNF), nerve growth factor (NGF), calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP), or interleukin-6 (IL-6), among others, which are already recommended in the treatment of chronic pain conditions such as osteoarthritis, chronic lower back pain, migraine, or rheumatoid arthritis that are under preclinical research. This narrative review summarizes the preclinical and clinical evidence supporting the use of these agents in the treatment of chronic pain.

Systematic review and meta-analysis of the prevalence of neuropathic-like pain and/or pain sensitization in people with knee and hip osteoarthritis

OBJECTIVE

To determine the prevalence of neuropathic-like pain (NP) and pain sensitization (PS) defined by self-report questionnaires in knee and hip osteoarthritis, and whether prevalence is potentially explained by disease-severity or affected joint.

DESIGN

MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL were systematically searched (1990-April 2020) for studies describing the prevalence of NP and PS in knee and hip osteoarthritis using self-report questionnaires. Random-effects meta-analysis was performed. Statistical heterogeneity between studies and sub-groups (affected joint and population source as a proxy for disease severity) was assessed (I² statistic and the Chi-squared test).

RESULTS

From 2,706 non-duplicated references, 39 studies were included (2011-2020). Thirty-six studies reported on knee pain and six on hip pain. For knee osteoarthritis, the pooled prevalence of NP was: using PainDETECT, possible NP(score ≥13) 40% (95%CI 32-48%); probable NP(score >18) 20% (95%CI 15-24%); using Self-Report Leeds Assessment of Neuropathic Symptoms and Signs, 32% (95%CI 26-38%); using Douleur Neuropathique (DN4) 41% (95% CI 24-59%). The prevalence of PS using Central Sensitization Inventory (CSI) was 36% (95% CI 12-59%). For hip osteoarthritis, the pooled prevalence of NP was: using PainDETECT, possible NP 29% (95%CI 22-37%%); probable NP 9% (95%CI 6-13%); using DN4 22% (95%CI 12-31%) in one study. The prevalence of possible NP pain was higher at the knee (40%) than the hip (29%) (difference 11% (95% CI 0-22%), P = 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

Using self-report questionnaire tools, NP was more prevalent in knee than hip osteoarthritis. The prevalence of NP in knee and hip osteoarthritis were similar for each joint regardless of study population source or tool used. Whether defining NP using self-report questionnaires enables more effective targeted therapy in osteoarthritis requires investigation.

[Pain evolution in patients with central sensitization and osteoarthritis after knee arthroplasty]

INTRODUCTION

In patients with knee osteoarthritis, a group of 30% has been identified with central pain sensitization (CPS). The aim is to analyze the persistence of CPS in patients after knee arthroplasty and its correlation with pain intensity, functionality, determining factors and to evaluate physical examination as an assessment instrument.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Quasi-experimental before-after study of patients operated on total knee arthroplasty. The evolution of subjective variables (pain characteristics, painDETECT questionnaire, WOMAC and Numerical Rating Scale) and physical examination (thermal hyperalgesia, allodynia, hypoesthesia, algometry and goniometry) 3 months before and 3 and 6 months after surgery are analysed using repeated measures ANOVA test for the quantitative ones and Cochran's Q for the qualitative ones. Spearmen test was used for the correlation of the questionnaires, the PD-Q and exploration variables and for the multivariate model of the PD-Q with clinical determinants.

RESULTS

Sixty-seven patients completed the study. The evolution of the quantitative and qualitative variables was significant, with a correlation between questionnaires. In the linear multivariate model of PD-Q, a significant relationship was obtained from personal history of flexion limitation, chronic musculoskeletal pain and the association between depression and time.

CONCLUSIONS

A significant percentage of patients with knee osteoarthritis after arthroplasty persisted with probable CPS, correlating with intensity and functionality. The limitation of mobility and previous chronic comorbidity could be determinants of CPS, with anamnesis and exploration being useful tools in consultation.

Nociplastic pain: towards an understanding of prevalent pain conditions

Nociplastic pain is the semantic term suggested by the international community of pain researchers to describe a third category of pain that is mechanistically distinct from nociceptive pain, which is caused by ongoing inflammation and damage of tissues, and neuropathic pain, which is caused by nerve damage. The mechanisms that underlie this type of pain are not entirely understood, but it is thought that augmented CNS pain and sensory processing and altered pain modulation play prominent roles. The symptoms observed in nociplastic pain include multifocal pain that is more widespread or intense, or both, than would be expected given the amount of identifiable tissue or nerve damage, as well as other CNS-derived symptoms, such as fatigue, sleep, memory, and mood problems. This type of pain can occur in isolation, as often occurs in conditions such as fibromyalgia or tension-type headache, or as part of a mixed-pain state in combination with ongoing nociceptive or neuropathic pain, as might occur in chronic low back pain. It is important to recognise this type of pain, since it will respond to different therapies than nociceptive pain, with a decreased responsiveness to peripherally directed therapies such as anti-inflammatory drugs and opioids, surgery, or injections.

Brain gray matter abnormalities in osteoarthritis pain: a cross-sectional evaluation

ABSTRACT

The interaction between osteoarthritis (OA) pain and brain properties remains minimally understood, although anatomical and functional neuroimaging studies suggest that OA, similar to other chronic pain conditions, may impact as well as partly be determined by brain properties. Here, we studied brain gray matter (GM) properties in OA patients scheduled to undergo total joint replacement surgery. We tested the hypothesis that brain regional GM volume is distinct between hip OA (HOA) and knee OA (KOA) patients, relative to healthy controls and moreover, that these properties are related to OA pain. Voxel-based morphometry group contrasts showed lower anterior cingulate GM volume only in HOA. When we reoriented the brains (flipped) to examine the hemisphere contralateral to OA pain, precentral GM volume was lower in KOA and HOA, and 5 additional brain regions showed distortions between groups. These GM changes, however, did not reflect clinical parameters. Next, we subdivided the brain into larger regions, approximating Brodmann areas, and performed univariable and machine learning-based multivariable contrasts. The univariable analyses approximated voxel-based morphometry results. Our multivariable model distinguished between KOA and controls, was validated in a KOA hold-out sample, and generalized to HOA. The multivariable model in KOA, but not HOA, was related to neuropathic OA pain. These results were mapped into term space (using Neurosynth), providing a meta-analytic summary of brain anatomical distortions in OA. Our results indicate more subtle cortical anatomical differences in OA than previously reported and also emphasize the interaction between OA pain, namely its neuropathic component, and OA brain anatomy.

Association of Chronic Pain with Radiologic Severity and Central Sensitization in Hip Osteoarthritis Patients

Purpose

Pain and joint deformity are the most common symptoms of hip osteoarthritis (OA). However, no significant association between pain and severity of radiographic lesions has been reported. Recently, central sensitization has been suggested as an underlying mechanism of pain in OA. We investigated the involvement of radiologic severity or central sensitization in the clinical manifestation of hip OA with various degrees of joint deformity.

Patients and Methods

We included 39 patients with hip OA and divided them into two groups according to the severity of the hip pain: strong/severe (numerical rating scale, NRS≥6) and mild/moderate (NRS<6). We assessed the radiologic severity of OA using the Kellgren-Lawrence (K-L) scale and minimum joint space width (mJSW). We conducted quantitative sensory testing (QST) that included pressure pain threshold (PPT) and temporal summation of pain (TSP) at hip, tibialis anterior (leg), and extensor carpi radialis longus (arm) on the affected side. We examined the difference of radiologic assessment and QST results between each group and the correlation of the NRS with the radiologic assessment and QST results.

Results

There was no significant difference in the K-L scale and mJSW between patients with strong/severe and mild/moderate joint pain. Strong/severe pain patients demonstrated a lower PPT at all measurement sites and higher TSP at the hip and leg than the mild/moderate pain patients. In addition, NRS was significantly negatively correlated with PPT and positively correlated with TSP at all measurement sites, but not with the K-L scale and mJSW.

Conclusion

We reported no significant difference in radiologic severity between patients with strong/severe and mild/moderate joint pain. By contrast, we found a significant difference in central sensitization represented by QST between strong/severe and mild/moderate joint pain groups. These results suggest that central sensitization may be involved in the joint pain of patients with hip OA who complain of severe pain despite less severe joint deformity.

Neuropathic-Like Pain Symptoms in a Community-Dwelling Sample with or at Risk for Knee Osteoarthritis

OBJECTIVE

To characterize neuropathic-like pain among individuals with or at risk for knee osteoarthritis.

SUBJECTS

One hundred eighty-four individuals who self-identified as non-Hispanic black or non-Hispanic white and presented with unilateral or bilateral knee pain.

DESIGN

Neuropathic-like pain was assessed using the painDETECT, and those with high vs low neuropathic-like pain were compared on clinical pain, psychological symptoms, physical function, and quantitative sensory testing. Analyses were unadjusted, partially and fully adjusted for relevant covariates.

RESULTS

Thirty-two (17.4%) participants reported experiencing neuropathic-like pain features above the painDETECT clinical cut-score. The neuropathic-like pain group reported significantly greater pain severity on all measures of clinical pain and higher levels of psychological symptoms when fully adjusted for covariates, but no differences emerged for disability and lower extremity function. The neuropathic-like pain group also reported greater overall heat pain ratings during the heat pain threshold and increased temporal summation of heat pain in the fully adjusted model. Additionally, those with neuropathic-like pain symptoms reported greater painful after-sensations following heat pain temporal summation in all analyses. No significant group differences in pressure pain threshold emerged at any of the testing sites. In contrast, temporal summation of mechanical pain was significantly greater at both the index knee and the ipsilateral hand for the neuropathic-like pain group in all analyses.

CONCLUSIONS

Participants with or at risk for knee osteoarthritis who reported high neuropathic-like pain experienced significantly greater clinical pain and increased heat and mechanical temporal summation at the index knee and other body sites tested, suggesting central sensitization.

Pain-related behavior is associated with increased joint innervation, ipsilateral dorsal horn gliosis, and dorsal root ganglia activating transcription factor 3 expression in a rat ankle joint model of osteoarthritis

Supplemental Digital Content is Available in the Text.

In a rat model of osteoarthritis, we found increased joint sensory and sympathetic innervation and glia changes in dorsal horn, accompanying pain-related behavior onset.

Introduction:

Osteoarthritis (OA)-associated pain is often poorly managed, as our understanding of the underlying pain mechanisms remains limited. The known variability from patient to patient in pain control could be a consequence of a neuropathic component in OA.

Methods:

We used a rat monoiodoacetate model of the ankle joint to study the time-course of the development of pain-related behavior and pathological changes in the joint, dorsal root ganglia (DRG), and spinal cord, and to investigate drug treatments effects.

Results:

Mechanical hypersensitivity and loss of mobility (as assessed by treadmill) were detected from 4 weeks after monoiodoacetate. Cold allodynia was detected from 5 weeks. Using histology and x-ray microtomography, we confirmed significant cartilage and bone degeneration at 5 and 10 weeks. We detected increased nociceptive peptidergic and sympathetic fiber innervation in the subchondral bone and synovium at 5 and 10 weeks. Sympathetic blockade at 5 weeks reduced pain-related behavior. At 5 weeks, we observed, ipsilaterally only, DRG neurons expressing anti-activating transcription factor 3, a neuronal stress marker. In the spinal cord, there was microgliosis at 5 and 10 weeks, and astrocytosis at 10 weeks only. Inhibition of glia at 5 weeks with minocycline and fluorocitrate alleviated mechanical allodynia.

Conclusion:

Besides a detailed time-course of pathology in this OA model, we show evidence of contributions of the sympathetic nervous system and dorsal horn glia to pain mechanisms. In addition, late activating transcription factor 3 expression in the DRG that coincides with these changes provides evidence in support of a neuropathic component in OA pain.

Nerve growth factor antibody for the treatment of osteoarthritis pain and chronic low-back pain: mechanism of action in the context of efficacy and safety

Chronic pain continues to be a significant global burden despite the availability of a variety of nonpharmacologic and pharmacologic treatment options. Thus, there is a need for new analgesics with novel mechanisms of action. In this regard, antibodies directed against nerve growth factor (NGF-Abs) are a new class of agents in development for the treatment of chronic pain conditions such as osteoarthritis and chronic low-back pain. This comprehensive narrative review summarizes evidence supporting pronociceptive functions for NGF that include contributing to peripheral and central sensitization through tropomyosin receptor kinase A activation and stimulation of local neuronal sprouting. The potential role of NGF in osteoarthritis and chronic low-back pain signaling is also examined to provide a mechanistic basis for the observed efficacy of NGF-Abs in clinical trials of these particular pain states. Finally, the safety profile of NGF-Abs in terms of common adverse events, joint safety, and nerve structure/function is discussed.

How Does Preoperative Central Sensitization Affect Quality of Life Following Total Knee Arthroplasty?

BACKGROUND

Central sensitization (CS) has been recently identified as a significant risk factor for persistent pain and patient dissatisfaction following total knee arthroplasty (TKA). However, it remains unclear as to whether the preoperative CS persists after the elimination of a nociceptive pain source by TKA, or how CS affects the quality of life after TKA.

METHODS

A total of 222 consecutive patients undergoing primary TKA were enrolled in the study. All patients were preoperatively screened for CS using the Central Sensitization Inventory (CSI) and categorized into either a CS (n = 55; CSI ≥ 40) or non-CS group (n = 167; CSI < 40). CSI, pain visual analog scale (VAS), Knee Society Score (KSS), Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index score, and satisfaction were recorded at postoperative 2 years.

RESULTS

Two years after TKA, preoperative CS remained unchanged; there was no difference between preoperative and postoperative CSI scores, and both preoperative and postoperative CSI severity levels were similar (P > .1). The CS group showed worse pain VAS, KSS, and Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index scores than did the non-CS group (P < .01) and more patients in the CS group were dissatisfied with all activities (P < .01). However, a similar percentage of the CS group achieved the previously documented minimal clinically important difference in pain VAS and KSS, compared with the non-CS group. Multivariate regression analysis revealed that preoperative CSI scores were associated with dissatisfaction at postoperative 2 years.

CONCLUSION

Preoperative CS was persistent at 2 years after TKA. Although CS patients achieved comparable clinical improvement following TKA, CS patients had worse quality of life, functional disability, and dissatisfaction than non-CS patients.

Does unilateral total hip arthroplasty improve pain and function in the non-operative hip joint?

BACKGROUND

Some reports suggested that the status of the opposite-side hip affects clinical outcomes of unilateral total hip arthroplasty (THA) for hip osteoarthritis (HOA). This study aimed to determine whether unilateral THA could improve pain and movement of the non-operative hip.

METHODS

The analysis included 195 patients divided into three groups according to contralateral hip status based on radiographic change assessed by Kellgren-Lawrence (KL) grade: normal hip (Group N: n = 124), HOA with KL grade > 2 (Group O: n = 39), and THA patients who already underwent THA in their opposite hip joint (Group T: n = 32). All patients were interviewed and examined preoperatively and at 1-year intervals after surgery. Hip function was evaluated with Harris Hip Score (HHS) and range of motion (ROM) preoperatively and at 1-year follow-up. We used the Japanese Orthopedic Association Hip-Disease Evaluation Questionnaire (JHEQ) and the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) for separately evaluated right and left hip joints.

RESULTS

The mJHEQ movement, which indicated the activity, and flexion of ROM in the non-operative hip improved in group N and group T. The VAS and JHEQ pain values did not differ between preoperative and 1-year follow-up in all groups. In the operative side, HHS function, JHEQ movement values in group O were significantly lower than those of groups N and T at 1-year follow-up.

CONCLUSION

Unilateral THA may improve non-operative hip movement and active daily life except when the non-operated hip shows osteoarthritis. It did not improve non-operative hip pain, regardless of the condition on the other side. Clinical outcomes of unilateral THA may be affected by opposite hip status each other.

Study on the correlation between knee osteoarthritis and anxiety in patients aged over 55

Introduction. Osteoarthritis, which is a cause of chronic pain and disability with manifestation in any joint, with greater frequency in the joints of the lower limbs, upper limbs, but also at the spine level , affects around 250 million people in the entire world. This condition affects around 10% of the global population (18) and has an impressive impact on people, as it is one of the first 5 causes of disability. Material and method. The objectives of the treatment made by the patients diagnosed with knee osteoarthritis were: pain reduction, increased joint amplitude, increased muscle strength, increased muscle tone, increased quality of life and reintegration into the family and social environment. In the study, there were discussed demographic data regarding the patients. In order to assess the pain parameter, the VAS scale was used, as well as WOMAC subscales. To assess the quality of life of patients with knee osteoarthritis, the QOL scale (Quality of Life) was used. Anxiety was assessed with the help of a test that comprises the evaluation of symptoms at the cognitive, behavioral and physical level. Results and discussions. The pain was evaluated on the VAS scale, having a statistically significant evolution for the evaluation moments. Also with the help of the WOMAC index, two other parameters were evaluated, namely joint rigidity and functional capacity, the results being statistically significant in the 3 evaluation moments. The patients’ anxiety was evaluated with the help of the anxiety test; the results obtained were statistically significant at the 3 evaluation moments. Conclusions. It is vital that the recovery treatment in osteoarthritis be individualized and adapted to the age group. In our group, it enabled the reduction of pain and anxiety, the increase of the functional capacity and the quality of the patients’ lives.Taking into account the fact that the most affected group in the study group was the active professional one, we can evaluate the size of the recovery and the social, family and professional integration for these patients.

Best Evidence Rehabilitation for Chronic Pain Part 5: Osteoarthritis

Osteoarthritis (OA) is a leading cause of chronic pain and disability in older adults, which most commonly affects the joints of the knee, hip, and hand. To date, there are no established disease modifying interventions that can halt or reverse OA progression. Therefore, treatment is focused on alleviating pain and maintaining or improving physical and psychological function. Rehabilitation is widely recommended as first-line treatment for OA as, in many cases, it is safer and more effective than the best-established pharmacological interventions. In this article, we describe the presentation of OA pain and give an overview of its peripheral and central mechanisms. We then provide a state-of-the-art review of rehabilitation for OA pain—including self-management programs, exercise, weight loss, cognitive behavioral therapy, adjunct therapies, and the use of aids and devices. Next, we explore several promising directions for clinical practice, including novel education strategies to target unhelpful illness and treatment beliefs, methods to enhance the efficacy of exercise interventions, and innovative, brain-directed treatments. Finally, we discuss potential future research in areas, such as treatment adherence and personalized rehabilitation for OA pain.

Evaluation of β-endorphin concentration, mood, and pain intensity in men with idiopathic hip osteoarthritis treated with variable magnetic field

Osteoarthritis is the most frequently diagnosed disease of the musculoskeletal system. Growing number of patients waiting for surgical treatment and the possible negative consequences resulting from long-term pharmacological therapy lead to the search for non-pharmacological methods aimed at alleviating pain and reducing doses of analgesics, among them physical therapy with use of magnetic fields.The study involved 30 men aged 49 to 76 (mean age, 61.7 years) treated for idiopathic osteoarthritis of the hip joint. The subjects were divided into 2 groups (15 patients each) and underwent a cycle of magnetostimulation and magnetoledtherapy procedures, respectively. During the exposure cycle concentrations of β-endorphin were assessed 3 times and the mood was assessed 2 times. In addition, the assessment of pain intensity and the dose of analgesic drugs was performed before and after the end of therapy.Statistically significant increase in plasma β-endorphins concentration was observed in both groups of patients (magnetostimulation-P < .01 vs magnetoledtherapy-P < .001). In the assessment of mood of respondents, no statistically significant differences were found. Significant reduction in intensity of perceived pain was observed in both groups of patients (P < .05). In the group of patients who underwent magnetoledtherapy cycle, the analgesic drug use was significantly lower by 13% (P < .05) as compared with initial values, which was not noted in group of patients who underwent magnetostimulation procedures.The use of magnetic field therapy in the treatment of men with idiopathic osteoarthritis of hip joints causes a statistically significant increase in the concentration of plasma β-endorphins resulting in statistically significant analgesic effect in both magnetostimulation and magnetoledtherapy treated groups of patients, with accompanying decrease of need for analgetic drugs in magnetoledtherapy group, but without any significant changes regarding the patient's mood.

Are painDETECT scores in musculoskeletal disorders associated with duration of daily pain and time elapsed since current pain onset?

Objectives:

We aimed to compare painDETECT scores in outpatients seen in a rheumatology department over a 1-month period and search for correlations between painDETECT scores and the estimated duration of daily pain and time elapsed since the onset of current pain.

Patients and Methods:

A total of 529 of 738 outpatients agreed to complete a set of questionnaires, including painDETECT.

Results:

The mean painDETECT score was 14.14 ± 7.59, and 31% of the patients had painDETECT scores of >18. Fibromyalgia ranked first (21.2 ± 6.0), followed by osteoarthritis of the lower limbs (17.8 ± 8.2), back pain and radiculopathies (16.1 ± 6.8), osteoarthritis of the upper limbs (15.7 ± 8.1), spondylarthrosis (15.1 ± 7.2), entrapment neuropathies (14.1 ± 2.4), rheumatoid arthritis (13.8 ± 7.1), miscellaneous conditions (13.8 ± 8.2), tendinitis (13.4 ± 7.9), connectivitis (11.5 ± 6.7), and osteoporosis (8.5 ± 6.9). The duration of daily pain was much longer in patients with painDETECT scores of >18 (12.41 ± 8.45 vs 6.53 ± 7.45 hours) (t = 0.0000), but very similar painDETECT scores were observed for patients suffering from pain for less than 1 week (13.7 ± 8.2; 38% > 18), for 1 month (14.5 ± 8.2; 25% > 18), several months (12.7 ± 7.3; 23% > 18), 1 year (13.8 ± 7.7; 29% > 18), or several years (14.7 ± 7.4; 33% > 18).

Conclusion:

PainDETECT scores differed little depending on the musculoskeletal condition, strongly correlated with the duration of daily pain, and appeared to be as high in patients with recent pain as in those suffering for years.